You are on page 1of 1

Expenses for Household and Guy R.

Traynor, whole or in part, for the acts or omissions


Dependent Care Services Branch Chief, Publications of the organization that were the basis for
Necessary for Gainful and Regulations Branch, revocation.
Legal Processing Division,
Employment; Correction Associate Chief Counsel Quality Industrial Services
(Procedure and Administration). Snohomish, WA
Announcement 2007–37
(Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on July 5, 2006, Nazareth, Inc.
8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register
AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service for July 6, 2006, 71 F.R. 38323) Cleveland Heights, OH
(IRS), Treasury.
One Step Ahead Daycare, Inc.
ACTION: Correction to notice of pro­
Deletions From Cumulative Racine, WI
posed rulemaking.
List of Organizations
Gift America Program
SUMMARY: This document contains a Contributions to Which Rockville, MD
correction to notice of proposed rulemak­ are Deductible Under Section
ing (REG–139059–02, 2006–24 I.R.B. 170 of the Code The Patrick and Janet Hayes
1052) that was published in the Federal Charitable Supporting Organization
Register on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 Announcement 2007–38 Houston, TX
(71 FR 29847) regarding the credit for
expenses for household and dependent The names of organizations that no 10th Life Foundation
care services necessary for gainful em­ longer qualify as organizations described Santa Barbara, CA
ployment. in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Rev­
enue Code of 1986 are listed below. San Francisco Neighbors Resource Center
FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Generally, the Service will not disallow San Francisco, CA
CONTACT: Sara Shepherd, (202) deductions for contributions made to a
622–4960 (not a toll-free call). listed organization on or before the date Emerald Foundation, Inc.
of announcement in the Internal Revenue Ojai, CA
SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bulletin that an organization no longer
qualifies. However, the Service is not Osterville Village Association
Background
precluded from disallowing a deduction Osterville, MA
for any contributions made after an or­
The notice of proposed rulemaking
ganization ceases to qualify under section
(REG–139059–02) that is the subject of
170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely Further Extension of Deadline
this correction is under section 21 of the
filed a suit for declaratory judgment under for Settlement Offered to
Internal Revenue Code.
section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had
knowledge of the revocation of the ruling Certain Foreign Embassy
Need for Correction
or determination letter, (2) was aware that Staff
As published, the notice of proposed such revocation was imminent, or (3) was
rulemaking (REG–139059–02) contains in part responsible for or was aware of the Announcement 2007–39
an error that may prove to be misleading activities or omissions of the organization
Following is a copy of the News Re­
and is in need of correction. that brought about this revocation.
lease issued by the Office of Deputy
If on the other hand a suit for declara­
Commissioner, International, on March
Correction of Publication tory judgment has been timely filed, con­
22, 2007 (IR–2007–67).
tributions from individuals and organiza­
Accordingly, the notice of proposed tions described in section 170(c)(2) that IRS Further Extends Deadline for
rulemaking (REG–139059–02), that was are otherwise allowable will continue to Settlement Offered To Certain Foreign
the subject of FR Doc. E6–7390, is cor­ be deductible. Protection under section Embassy Staff
rected as follows: 7428(c) would begin on April 9, 2007, and
1. On page 29848, column 2, in the would end on the date the court first deter­ IR–2007–67, Mar. 22, 2007
preamble under the paragraph heading “3. mines that the organization is not described
Special Rule for Children of Separated or in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue
Divorced Parents”, line 4 from the bot­ set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For indi­ Service is providing a further extension,
tom of the paragraph, the language “sec­ vidual contributors, the maximum deduc­ until June 30, 2007, of the deadline for
tion 152(e)(3)(A) as the parent with” cor­ tion protected is $1,000, with a husband current and former U.S.-based employees
rected to read “section 152(e)(4)(A) as the and wife treated as one contributor. This of foreign embassies, consular offices and
parent with.” benefit is not extended to any individual, in missions and international organizations to

April 9, 2007 954 2007–15 I.R.B.

You might also like