A notice of proposed rulemaking contains an error that may prove to be misleading. The language "section 152(e)(4)(A) as the parent with" is cor rected. The correction was made by the IRS in response to a request by a taxpayer.
A notice of proposed rulemaking contains an error that may prove to be misleading. The language "section 152(e)(4)(A) as the parent with" is cor rected. The correction was made by the IRS in response to a request by a taxpayer.
A notice of proposed rulemaking contains an error that may prove to be misleading. The language "section 152(e)(4)(A) as the parent with" is cor rected. The correction was made by the IRS in response to a request by a taxpayer.
Traynor, whole or in part, for the acts or omissions
Dependent Care Services Branch Chief, Publications of the organization that were the basis for Necessary for Gainful and Regulations Branch, revocation. Legal Processing Division, Employment; Correction Associate Chief Counsel Quality Industrial Services (Procedure and Administration). Snohomish, WA Announcement 2007–37 (Filed by the Office of the Federal Register on July 5, 2006, Nazareth, Inc. 8:45 a.m., and published in the issue of the Federal Register AGENCY: Internal Revenue Service for July 6, 2006, 71 F.R. 38323) Cleveland Heights, OH (IRS), Treasury. One Step Ahead Daycare, Inc. ACTION: Correction to notice of pro Deletions From Cumulative Racine, WI posed rulemaking. List of Organizations Gift America Program SUMMARY: This document contains a Contributions to Which Rockville, MD correction to notice of proposed rulemak are Deductible Under Section ing (REG–139059–02, 2006–24 I.R.B. 170 of the Code The Patrick and Janet Hayes 1052) that was published in the Federal Charitable Supporting Organization Register on Wednesday, May 24, 2006 Announcement 2007–38 Houston, TX (71 FR 29847) regarding the credit for expenses for household and dependent The names of organizations that no 10th Life Foundation care services necessary for gainful em longer qualify as organizations described Santa Barbara, CA ployment. in section 170(c)(2) of the Internal Rev enue Code of 1986 are listed below. San Francisco Neighbors Resource Center FOR FURTHER INFORMATION Generally, the Service will not disallow San Francisco, CA CONTACT: Sara Shepherd, (202) deductions for contributions made to a 622–4960 (not a toll-free call). listed organization on or before the date Emerald Foundation, Inc. of announcement in the Internal Revenue Ojai, CA SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Bulletin that an organization no longer qualifies. However, the Service is not Osterville Village Association Background precluded from disallowing a deduction Osterville, MA for any contributions made after an or The notice of proposed rulemaking ganization ceases to qualify under section (REG–139059–02) that is the subject of 170(c)(2) if the organization has not timely Further Extension of Deadline this correction is under section 21 of the filed a suit for declaratory judgment under for Settlement Offered to Internal Revenue Code. section 7428 and if the contributor (1) had knowledge of the revocation of the ruling Certain Foreign Embassy Need for Correction or determination letter, (2) was aware that Staff As published, the notice of proposed such revocation was imminent, or (3) was rulemaking (REG–139059–02) contains in part responsible for or was aware of the Announcement 2007–39 an error that may prove to be misleading activities or omissions of the organization Following is a copy of the News Re and is in need of correction. that brought about this revocation. lease issued by the Office of Deputy If on the other hand a suit for declara Commissioner, International, on March Correction of Publication tory judgment has been timely filed, con 22, 2007 (IR–2007–67). tributions from individuals and organiza Accordingly, the notice of proposed tions described in section 170(c)(2) that IRS Further Extends Deadline for rulemaking (REG–139059–02), that was are otherwise allowable will continue to Settlement Offered To Certain Foreign the subject of FR Doc. E6–7390, is cor be deductible. Protection under section Embassy Staff rected as follows: 7428(c) would begin on April 9, 2007, and 1. On page 29848, column 2, in the would end on the date the court first deter IR–2007–67, Mar. 22, 2007 preamble under the paragraph heading “3. mines that the organization is not described Special Rule for Children of Separated or in section 170(c)(2) as more particularly WASHINGTON — The Internal Revenue Divorced Parents”, line 4 from the bot set forth in section 7428(c)(1). For indi Service is providing a further extension, tom of the paragraph, the language “sec vidual contributors, the maximum deduc until June 30, 2007, of the deadline for tion 152(e)(3)(A) as the parent with” cor tion protected is $1,000, with a husband current and former U.S.-based employees rected to read “section 152(e)(4)(A) as the and wife treated as one contributor. This of foreign embassies, consular offices and parent with.” benefit is not extended to any individual, in missions and international organizations to