Professional Documents
Culture Documents
A R T I C L E I N F O A B S T R A C T
Article history: Objective: To determine the factors related to adverse pregnancy outcomes and neonatal thyroid
Received 25 November 2013 dysfunction in pregnancies complicated by Graves’ disease.
Received in revised form 24 February 2014 Study design: Thirty-five pregnancies complicated by Graves’ disease were divided into two groups:
Accepted 5 March 2014
adverse pregnancy outcome (n = 15) and no adverse pregnancy outcome (n = 20). Adverse pregnancy
outcomes included spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, premature delivery, fetal growth restriction, and
Keywords: pregnancy-induced hypertension. The 31 pregnancies resulting in live births were also divided into two
Antithyroid medication
groups: neonatal thyroid dysfunction (n = 9) and normal neonatal thyroid function (n = 22). Serum levels
Graves’ disease
Neonatal thyroid dysfunction
of thyroid-stimulating hormone (TSH), free thyroxine (FT4), TSH-receptor antibody (TRAb), the duration
Outcome of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy, doses of antithyroid medication, and the duration of maternal
antithyroid medication throughout pregnancy were compared.
Results: There were no significant differences in these factors between pregnancies with an adverse
pregnancy outcome and those with no adverse pregnancy outcome. However, serum levels of FT4, TRAb,
the duration of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy, the maximum daily dose of antithyroid medication, and
the total dose of antithyroid medication were significantly different between pregnancies with neonatal
thyroid dysfunction and those with normal neonatal thyroid function. Multivariate logistic regression
analysis showed that the FT4 level in mothers was a significant factor related to the development of
neonatal thyroid dysfunction (odds ratio 28.84, 95% confidence interval 1.65–503.62, p < 0.05).
Conclusion: Graves’ disease activity in women of childbearing age should be well controlled prior to
conception.
ß 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejogrb.2014.03.007
0301-2115/ß 2014 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
90 M. Uenaka et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 177 (2014) 89–93
disease-complicated pregnancies to maintain maternal serum CI, confidence interval; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FT4, free thyroxine;
levels of FT4 at the upper limit of the reference range for non- TRAb, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody.
pregnant women. Thirty-one pregnancies resulted in 32 live births,
while 4 pregnancies ended in spontaneous abortions. All 35
pregnancies were divided into 2 groups: adverse pregnancy increase in medication (p = 0.27), and the duration of antithyroid
outcome (n = 15) and no adverse pregnancy outcome (n = 20). medication (24 [0–37] vs. 31.5 [0–39] weeks; p = 0.32) between
Adverse pregnancy outcomes were defined as spontaneous pregnancies with an adverse outcome and those with no adverse
abortion, stillbirth, PD, FGR, and PIH. The 31 pregnancies involving outcome (Table 1).
live births were also divided into 2 groups: neonatal thyroid Of the 31 mothers who had live births, 9 (29.0%) had neonatal
dysfunction (n = 9) and normal neonatal thyroid function (n = 22). thyroid dysfunction involving 5 neonates with hyperthyroidism, 3
We compared serum levels of minimum TSH and maximum FT4 with transient hypothyroidism, and 1 with central hypothyroidism
during pregnancy, second-generation TRAb in the third trimester, (Table 2). In neonatal transient hypothyroidism, serum FT4 levels
the duration of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy, doses of antithyroid were transiently low in combination with high TSH levels. In
medication (maximum daily dose, total dose, and an increase in central (hypothalamic or pituitary) hypothyroidism, FT4 and TSH
medication during pregnancy), and the duration of maternal levels were low. Graves’ disease was diagnosed during the second
antithyroid medication during pregnancy between the two groups. or third trimester for the first time in Case 5 and Case 9. Case 9 was
In the four cases with spontaneous abortion, maternal TRAb values a woman who was transferred to the hospital because of
during early pregnancy were used for analysis. Serum levels of TSH premature rupture of the membranes at 30 GW. She complained
(normal: 0.449–3.809 mU/mL) and FT4 (normal: 0.82–1.22 ng/dL) of palpitations and perspiration. She was investigated for
in mothers and neonates were measured using the Abbott hyperthyroidism, and subsequently a cesarean section was
ARCHITECT i2000SR Analyzer (Abbott Japan, Tokyo, Japan). The performed before commencement of antithyroid medication.
DYNO test TRAb Human kit (Yamasa, Tokyo, Japan) was used for In 9 mothers with neonatal thyroid dysfunction and 22 with
TRAb measurement (normal: <1.0 IU/L). In statistical calculations, normal neonatal thyroid function, levels of the maximum FT4
values of less than cut-off levels of maternal TSH and TRAb were during pregnancy (median [range], 2.8 [1.23–4.58] vs. 1.3 [1.04–
considered the same as the cut-off value. The biological potency of 3.23] ng/dL; p < 0.005) (Fig. 1A), TRAb in the third trimester (10.5
1 mg methimazole was converted to that of 20 mg propylthiouracil [4.0–512] vs. 1.35 [0.8–26] IU/L; p < 0.001) (Fig. 1B), the duration
as described previously [11,12]. of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy (30 [1–39] vs. 1 [0–37] weeks;
Differences between the two groups were analyzed by the p < 0.005) (Fig. 1C), the maximum daily dose of antithyroid
Mann–Whitney U test and Fisher’s exact test. Values were medication (200 [0–300] vs. 100 [0–400] mg; p < 0.05) (Fig. 1D),
considered statistically significant when p < 0.05. To assess and the total dose of antithyroid medication (42.3 [0–50.7] vs. 13.0
significant factors, uni- and multi-variate logistic regression [0–77.0] g; p < 0.05) (Fig. 1E) were significantly different. There
analyses were performed using SAS version 9.1 software (SAS were no significant differences in serum levels of minimum TSH
Institute Inc., Cary, NC, USA). during pregnancy (0.004 [0.003–0.007] vs. 0.005 [0.003–1.79] mU/
mL; p = 0.12), increase in medication (p = 0.11), and the duration of
3. Results antithyroid medication (32 [0–39] vs. 28 [0–39] weeks; p = 0.37).
Table 3 shows the results of uni- and multi-variate logistic
Mothers had a median age of 32.5 years (range, 23–44 years), regression analyses of factors related to neonatal thyroid
and the gestational week (GW) at delivery was 37.9 GW (30– dysfunction. Maximum FT4 levels during pregnancy, the duration
41 GW). Four pregnancies ended in spontaneous abortion during of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy, and the maximum daily dose
5–18 GW. The weight of the neonates was 2827 g (1290–3694 g). and total dose of antithyroid medication were found to be
Of the 35 pregnancies complicated by Graves’ disease, adverse significant factors related to neonatal thyroid dysfunction by
pregnancy outcomes involved 4 spontaneous abortions (11.4%), 7 univariate analysis. Multivariate logistic regression analysis
were PD (20.0%), 4 were FGR (11.4%), and 5 were PIH (14.3%). There showed that maximum FT4 during pregnancy was the only
were no significant differences in serum levels of minimum TSH significant factor related to neonatal thyroid dysfunction (odds
during pregnancy (median [range], 0.023 [0.003–1.92] vs. 0.004 ratio 28.84, 95% confidence interval1.65–503.62, p < 0.05).
[0.003–1.79] mU/mL; p = 0.24), maximum FT4 during pregnancy
(1.44 [1.04–2.8] vs. 1.54[1.04–4.58] ng/dL; p = 0.31), TRAb in the 4. Comment
third trimester (1.5 [0.8–26] vs. 2.25 [1.0–512] IU/L; p = 0.37), the
duration of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy(5 [0–37] vs. 13 [0–38] Pregnant women with hyperthyroidism have an increased risk
weeks; p = 0.55), the maximum daily dose of antithyroid medica- of spontaneous abortion, stillbirth, PD, FGR, PIH, and maternal
tion (50 [0–300] vs. 175 [0–400] mg; p = 0.11), the total dose of heart failure. Kriplani et al. reported the outcomes of 32
antithyroid medication (8.9 [0–45.1] vs. 18.0 [0–77.0] g; p = 0.21), pregnancies complicated by hyperthyroidism, and found that
M. Uenaka et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 177 (2014) 89–93 91
TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FT4, free thyroxine; TRAb, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody; PIH, pregnancy-induced hypertension; PD, premature delivery; Hyper-, hyperthyroidism; Trans. hypo-, transient
25% of them had PD, 13% had FGR, and 22% had PIH [2]. Momotani
Neonatal thyroid
et al. showed that the incidence of spontaneous abortion is 25.7% in
Central hypo-
mothers with hyperthyroidism at the time of conception compared
Trans. hypo-
Trans. hypo-
Trans. hypo-
dysfunction
with 12.8% in euthyroid mothers [3]. In the present study, the
Hyper-
Hyper-
Hyper-
Hyper-
Hyper-
incidence of spontaneous abortion was 11.4%, PD was 20.0%, FGR
was 11.4%, and PIH was 14.3% in pregnancies complicated by
Graves’ disease. The incidence of PD, FGR, and PIH in women with
FT4 (ng/dL)
A 2.69/0.71
B 2.17/0.58
Graves’ disease in our study was higher than that in those with a
3.46/1.62
2.34/2.14
2.58/1.44
1.98/1.08
0.75/1.34
0.93/1.42
0.44/1.52
3.80/0.98
normal pregnancy, in which the incidence of spontaneous abortion
Serum levels in neonates
incidence of PD, FGR, and PIH in our study is not reflective of the
general population of pregnant women. No significant factor for
B <0.004/0.097
A 0.005/0.062
TSH (mU/mL)
336/1.822
15.6/2.19
analyses. The reason for this lack of finding of a significant factor
might be because the disease activity of women in our study was
relatively well controlled. Therefore, the incidence of an adverse
pregnancy outcome was not high in the present study compared
Birth-weight
2848
2968
2966
2822
2568
41
37
40
30
PIH, PD
PIH, PD
but not TSH and FT4 levels at the time of delivery, as predictive
medication
Yes
Yes
Yes
Yes
–
42.7
25.2
19.6
49.7
44.8
29.0
50.7
200
200
300
200
200
300
10.5
10.0
512
9.2
5.3
4.0
2.80
2.80
the fetus and that a gestational period earlier than 32 GW may be the
[(Fig._1)TD$IG]
92 M. Uenaka et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 177 (2014) 89–93
A B
p<0.005 p<0.001
8 600
7 525
6 450
Maternal TRAblevels
Maternal FT4 levels
5 375
4 300
(ng/dL)
(IU/L)
3 225
2 150
1 75
0 0
Neonatal Normal neonatal Neonatal Normal neonatal
thyroid dysfunction thyroid function thyroid dysfunction thyroid function
C p<0.005 D p<0.05
40 400
30 300
25 250
20 200
(weeks)
(mg/d)
15 150
10 100
5 50
0 0
Neonatal Normal neonatal Neonatal Normal neonatal
thyroid dysfunction thyroid function thyroid dysfunction thyroid function
E P<0.05
100
90
Total dose of antithyroid medication(g)
80
70
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
Neonatal Normal neonatal
thyroid dysfunction thyroid function
Fig. 1. (A) Maternal levels of FT4 and neonatal thyroid function. (B) Maternal levels of TRAb and neonatal thyroid function. (C) Duration of hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. (D)
Maximum daily dose of antithyroid medication and neonatal thyroid function. (E) Total dose of antithyroid medication and neonatal thyroid function. Individual data of
pregnant women with neonatal thyroid dysfunction (n = 9) were compared with those of pregnant women with normal neonatal thyroid function (n = 22) (open circles).
Neonatal thyroid dysfunction included hyperthyroidism (n = 5) (gray circles), transient hypothyroidism (n = 3) (closed circles), and central hypothyroidism (n = 1) (banded
circle). Horizontal bars indicate median values in each group. In terms of the doses of antithyroid medication, the biological potency of 1 mg methimazole was converted into
that of 20 mg propylthiouracil. Differences were analyzed by the Mann–Whitney U test.
critical time for development of central hypothyroidism [15]. In the Multivariate analysis showed that a high level of serum FT4 in
present study, Case 9 (Table 2), who underwent a cesarean section at mothers was a factor for the development of neonatal thyroid
30 GW before commencement of antithyroid medication, developed dysfunction. Therefore, Graves’ disease activity in women of
neonatal central hypothyroidism. childbearing age should be well controlled prior to conception.
M. Uenaka et al. / European Journal of Obstetrics & Gynecology and Reproductive Biology 177 (2014) 89–93 93
Table 3
Results of uni- and multivariate logistic regression analyses of the factors related to neonatal thyroid dysfunction.
p-Value Odds ratio (95% CI) p-Value Odds ratio (95% CI)
CI, confidence interval; TSH, thyroid-stimulating hormone; FT4, free thyroxine; TRAb, thyroid-stimulating hormone receptor antibody.
Approximately 0.8% of pregnant women will have undiagnosed [5] Mitsuda N, Tamaki H, Amino N, Hosono T, Miyai K, Tanizawa O. Risk factors for
developmental disorders in infants born to women with Graves disease. Obstet
hyperthyroidism [16], but universal screening of pregnant women Gynecol 1992;80:359–64.
for thyroid disease is not generally recommended [17]. However, [6] Matsuura N, Konishi J, Fujieda K, et al. TSH-receptor antibodies in mothers
screening of thyroid function might be necessary for pregnant with Graves’ disease and outcome in their offspring. Lancet 1988;1:14–7.
[7] Kamijo K. TSH-receptor antibodies determined by the first, second and third
women who have a present illness or history of spontaneous generation assays and thyroid-stimulating antibody in pregnant patients with
abortion, premature labor, FGR, or PIH. Graves’ disease. Endocr J 2007;54:619–24.
[8] Momotani N, Noh J, Oyanagi H, Ishikawa N, Ito K. Antithyroid drug therapy for
Graves’ disease during pregnancy. N Engl J Med 1986;315:24–8.
Condensation [9] Cooper DS. Treatment of thyrotoxicosis. In: Braverman LE, Utiger RD, editors.
Werner and Ingbar’s the thyroid: a fundamental and clinical text. 6th ed.,
Philadelphia: Lippincott; 1991. p. 887–916.
Free thyroxine levels in mothers with Graves’ disease are [10] Momotani N, Noh J, Ishikawa N, Ito K. Effects of propylthiouracil and methi-
independently associated with the development of neonatal mazole on fetal thyroid status in mothers with Graves’ hyperthyroidism. J Clin
Endocrinol Metab 1997;82:3633–6.
thyroid dysfunction. [11] Cooper DS. Antithyroid drugs. N Engl J Med 2005;352:905–17.
[12] Nakamura H, Noh J, Itoh K, et al. Comparison of methimazole and pro-
pylthiouracil in patients with hyperthyroidism caused by Graves’ disease. J
References Clin Endocrinol Metab 2007;92:2157–62.
[13] Mestman JH. Hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. Best Pract Res Clin Endocrinol
[1] Earl R, Crowther CA, Middleton P. Interventions for preventing and treating Metab 2004;18:267–88.
hyperthyroidism in pregnancy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev [14] Dussault JH. Neonatal screening for congenital hypothyroidism. Clin Lab Med
2010;9:CD008633. 1993;13:645–52.
[2] Kriplani A, Buckshee K, Bhargava VL, Takkar D, Ammini AC. Maternal and [15] Higuchi R, Miyawaki M, Kumagai T, et al. Central hypothyroidism in infants
perinatal outcome in thyrotoxicosis complicating pregnancy. Eur J Obstet who were born to mothers with thyrotoxicosis before 32 weeks’ gestation: 3
Gynaecol Reprod Biol 1994;54:159–63. cases. Pediatrics 2005;115:e623.
[3] Momotani N, Ito K. Treatment of pregnant patients with Basedow’s disease. [16] Sahu MT, Das V, Mittal S, Agarwal A, Sahu M. Overt and subclinical thyroid
Exp Clin Endocrinol 1991;97:268–74. dysfunction among Indian pregnant women and its effect on maternal and
[4] Millar LK, Wing DA, Leung AS, Koonings PP, Montoro MN, Mestman JH. Low fetal outcome. Arch Gynecol Obstet 2010;281:215–20.
birth weight and preeclampsia in pregnancies complicated by hyperthyroid- [17] Stagnaro-Green A. Overt hyperthyroidism and hypothyroidism during preg-
ism. Obstet Gynecol 1994;84:946–9. nancy. Clin Obstet Gynecol 2011;54:478–87.