Professional Documents
Culture Documents
ASSIGNMENT
Class: TOAE301(2-1415).1_LT
Group Members:
1. Vũ Hoàng Anh - 1313340007
2. Phạm Thị Thanh Thúy - 1314340049
3. Quách Thị Thu Trang - 1313340051
4. Đặng Trần Sơn Tùng - 1313340053
5. Nguyễn Thanh Tùng - 1312340054
4
1.5. Scope of the study
Our investigation will be conducted randomly on 220 students in the
Foreign Trade University from 2015 February to April due to the facts
that:
They are suitable for the topic and the ability of the team.
More importantly, the subject is totally suitable for the requirements of
the survey.
5
Chapter 2: DATA AND METHODOLOGY
2.1. Data
Type of data
Primary source
Secondary source
Sources of data
Primary source: information collected from students in Foreign Trade
University through surveys.
Secondary source: information collected from the internet, reports in
magazines, newspapers…
2.2. Methodology
2.2.1. Questionnaire
SURVEY
For our Statistics assignment, we are to conduct a survey of our choice
and use various statistical techniques to analyze its data. Please help us by
filling this survey!
Question 1: How would you rate the significance of those criteria when you
buy a mobile phone? (from 1 – most important to 4 – least important)
Price Model
Question 2: Where do you often get information before buying a mobile phone?
Acquaintances (friends, teachers, siblings...)
Online channels (facebook, website, youtube commercials, technology
forum...)
Offline promoting events (banners, posters, leaflets...)
Others: .....................................................
6
Purpose of Q2: to find out the main information sources when students
want to learn information to buy cell phone.
Question 4: Which are the brands that you will take into consideration when
buying a phone?
Purpose of Q4: to build up data for researching which mobile brands are
most preferable among students.
Purpose of Q5: to find out which mobile brands are used by students
most.
Question 6: What was the price of your current phone when you bought it?
……… (million VND)
Purpose of Q6: to analyze students’ affordability.
7
Question 8: How do you find the information about mobile phones on the
market nowadays?
Multidimensional information Distinct
Messy Useless
Purpose of Q8: This question shows us the data about how students
assess information on the cell phone market today.
Question 9: How do you think of the quality of mobile phones nowadays in
general?
Good Acceptable Getting worse day by day
Purpose of Q9: to examine the quality of mobile phones according to the
students’ evaluation.
Question 10: When you bought your current phone, you did:
No research A little research A lot of research
Purpose of Q10: to examine how much infomation students research
before buying mobie phones
8
2.2.2. Methods of choosing sample
Stratified random samples
Firstly, we divide the population (all of FTU students) into 4 subgroups
(called strata):
Group 1: 1st year students
Group 2: 2nd year students
Group 3: 3rd year students
Group 4: 4th year student
Then, simple random samples are selected from each subgroup
We choose randomly 55 students from each subgroup
Finally, samples from 4 subgroups are combined into
(220 responses are valid because the all of the students joining the investigation
complete the survey)
9
Chapter 3: FINDINGS
27%
28%
Price
According to the result of the above statistic, we can see that the criteria
of students when choosing cell phones do not differ much. Of all the four
criteria, the criteria Price reachs 611 out of 2200 points corresponding to 28%,
10
which means this is the first criteria that students consider when choosing cell
phone. Meanwhile, criteria Design reach the lowest points (467 out of 2200)
corresponding to 21%. Thus, based on the chart we can conclude that when
buying the phone, students often consider Price as first criteria, followed by
Quality, Brand and Design in order.
Others 3 1%
Acquaintances
Online
Through the model we can easily see that more than a half students
buying cell phone based on the information from acquaintances (friends,
teachers, family) with 131/255 voted (correspond to 52%). Besides, information
11
through some online channels such as Facebook, websites from cell phone
providers, Youtube etc also is the major information sources for students with
98/255 voted ( correspond to 38%). Finally, quite a few students used outside
advertisements and others (correspond to 10%).
This statistics show us that the students are relatively cautious when
finding information sources to buy cell phone. The sources being mostly
selected are reliable and highly precise. Besides, information sources being from
acquaintances and online website are trusted and popular to many students
today.
iOS 75 32%
Window 30 13%
Through the survey, we see that Android with 130 out of 235 votes
corresponding to 55% is the most favorite operation system. Next, the operation
system iOS reaching 72 votes is the 2nd favorite one. And Window is the least
favorite operating system with only 30 votes.
Android is now widely being used and and becoming more and more
popular because it is the easiest operation system to use of the three categories
named above. Furthermore, this operating system is also used for many different
cell phone brands (Samsung, LG, Sony, ...). In particular, Android provides
huge app store, many free and useful tools, which is suitable for students.
12
4. Question 4: Favourable mobile brands
Most favourable mobile brands
Apple 90 41%
Sony 17 8%
HTC 19 9%
Nokia 29 13%
LG 12 5%
Samsung 43 20%
Oppo 3 1%
Other 7 3%
From the table, we easily interfere that students prefer Apple most with 90
out of 220 votes (41%). Samsung ranks 2nd with 43 out of 220 votes (20%).
Nokia and HTC respectively stand in 3rd and 4th position with 13% and 9%. All
other brands seem less attractive to students.
13
5. Question 5: Popular mobile brands
Mobile brands Quantity Frequency
Apple 39 18%
Sony 9 4%
HTC 10 5%
Nokia 80 36%
LG 11 5%
Samsung 49 22%
Oppo 6 3%
Other 16 7%
Oppo 3%
Samsung 22%
LG 5%
Nokia 36%
HTC 5%
Sony 4%
Apple 18%
From the above result, we can figure out that Nokia is the most popular
choice in university with 80 out of 220 votes (36%). The 2 nd and 3rd respectively
is Samsung and Apple with 49 and 39 out of 220 interviewed students.
Meanwhile, Oppo, Sony, HTC and other brands name account for very small
share, showing that the brands are not popular among university students.
Three most popular mobile brands are three high-quality big famous
mobile company in the world. The others are supposed to be less common
14
because the information about their products is relatively limited in mobile in
market.
6. Question 6: Evaluating students’ affordability
Number of phones which are bought at price level
Price
Quant Freque Mea Mo Medi Varian Standard
(million ity ncy n de an ce Deviation
dong)
<2.5 56 25.45%
2.5-4.5 45 20.45%
4.5-6.5 58 26.36%
6.5-8.5 18 8.18%
5.75 4.99 4.81 18.27 4.27
8.5-10.5 12 5.45%
10.5-12.5 3 1.36%
12.5-14.5 6 2.73%
>14.5 22 10.00%
Total 100.00
220
%
60
50
40
30
20
10
0
<2.5 2.5-4.5 4.5-6.5 6.5-8.5 8.5-10.5 10.5-12.5 12.5-14.5 >14.5
15
The result shows that, among 220 people surveyed, 159 people paid 6.5
million or less for their handset, accounting for 72.26%. Given mean price
(average price) is 5.75 million dong per one phone.
Thus, we can conclude that the solvency of students for a phone is
below average level. This is fully consistent with the pockets of undergraduates,
the majority of whom are still financially dependent on their families.
From the above result, phone price has a huge influence on purchasing
decisions of students. In general, at low price level, people buy more mobile
phones and vice versa. With the result on price, we will construct a demand
function to see the effects of prices on the demand for mobile phones in the
viewpoint of students.
Given that:
Causal criterion P: Phone purchasing money ( million dong)
Consequent criterion Q: Number of phones which are bought at price
level (unit)
From table 1, we have:
∑𝑷 ∑𝑸 ∑ 𝑷𝟐 ∑ 𝑷𝑸 Variance Variance
N
of P of Q
Comment:
16
Because | r | = 0.74 is high, the relationship between the two criteria and
outputare relatively tight. This shows that phone prices have a huge
influence on students of Foreign Trade university demand for phone.
However, beside the price, there are many different criteria which affect
buying decision of students such as model, brand name, quality,
configure, etc.
For r <0, the relationship between price and quantity demanded is
negatively correlated. This shows that the higher the price of phones, the
less students buy and vice versa, when the phone price falls, students will
tend to buy more phones. This result is entirely consistent with the law of
demand.
7. Question 7: Researching about students’ purposes of
using mobile phone
Purposes of using mobile phone Quantity Frequency
Study 59 16%
Other 20 5%
160
140
120
100
80
60
40
20
0
Phone call Applications Study Other
Intricacy 48 22%
Precision 23 10%
Vacuity 6 3%
Precision
Intricacy
Multidimensionality
From the statistical table and the model, it’s easy to be seen that major
students claim that the information on the cell phone market today is too
multidimensional and intricate, which account for 87%.
18
Those opinions may appear just because now there are too many
manufacturers, each one gives many information and different designs to
compete to each other on the market. Thus, it accidently jam the information
causing difficulties to customers when they want to buy a cell phone.
Normal 98 45%
Poor 12 5%
50%
45%
The data collected show that the students have really good feedback about
the quality of today's cell phones. Most of them say that the current cell phones
have Good or Normal quality, only 5% rate Poor. This is totally understandable
because with modern technology, the cell phone brands today constantly
improve both quality and designs of their products to increase their
competitiveness in the market.
19
10. Question 10: Analyzing levels of learning information
when making decision to buy a cell phone.
11%
34%
55%
20
11. Question 11: Assessing the influence of advertisement
on phone purchasing decision.
The influence of advertisement on phone purchasing decision of students
High 39 18%
15%
100%
80%
67%
60%
40%
18%
20%
0%
21
12. Question 12: Evaluating the satisfaction with the
current phone.
Evaluating the satisfaction with the current phone of the students.
No 52 24%
24%
76%
Yes No
Finally, when reseach about the level of students’ satisfaction with theỉr
current phone, we see 76 % of them said that they feel good, others are not
satisfied. Thus, to choose a suitable mobile phone which can satisfy the needs of
themselves, the students need to be based on multiple criteria such as price,
design, quality, brand names... Still, not all students are able to choose a handset
matching their requirements.
22
Chapter 4: CONCLUSION
From the results of the research, we already have an overview of how
students, specifically, FTU students, assess today’s mobile phone market, and
their interests in buying this kind of devices. Of all the criteria, price is the most
important element in buying decision, then the quality itself comes at the second
place. Students often buy mobile phones at the price in between 5 and 7.5
million VND, commonly down from 6.5 million VND, which is a reasonable
price for undergraduates. When buying a phone, they, in one way or another, go
find information about their intended phone, mostly from their acquaintances or
online sources. As we can see, they are quite careful and cautious in choosing a
mobile phone, caring not only about prices and information sources, but also
about brand names. At this moment, Nokia and Samsung still remain two most
popular brand names among students due to their affordable prices and
fashionable designs. Meanwhile, Apple is still a desire to most of students (when
they were asked about their favourite brands). Besides, Android operating
system, with their outstanding features, is becoming more and more popular in
this segmented market.
Another conclusion can be drawn from the survey is that most of the
mobile phones on sales nowadays have acceptable and good quality; however,
because of harsh competition among mobile phone firms, public information is
getting quite intricate, which makes it hard for consumers to make decisions.
Advertisements do have some effects on buying behaviours of consumers. Most
importantly, wider range of choices does bring a higher level of satisfaction for
students when buying a phone not only for communication but also for
entertainment and education purposes. Although many efforts have been put into
this research, we cannot avoid some unintentionally subjective perspectives and
academic mistakes. However, we hope that this report is of practical values,
especially for undergraduates in general and FTU students in particular, in their
later and more intensive research.
23
PARTICIPATION EVALUATION
24