Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Candidate Number:
0217
Center Number:
US619
April 2017
Question:
Word Count:
1817
To What Extent is Tourism a Positive Influence on Culture?
Unbeknownst to other people, tourism does not only consist of luxury hotels along the
coast, the epitome of serenity only a payment away. No, there are many different kinds to exist
with many different reasons as to why it exists. Such examples that specifically deal with cultural
tourism are heritage tourism, arts tourism, urban and rural cultural tourism, indigneous cultural
tourism (Olsen). Thanks to tourism, people from all over the globe can learn and experience
something new and unique, while others can share their knowledge and love of their background.
However, some speculate that as tourism in an area boosts, so does their need for something
"new" eventually leading to manufacturing a cheap, lazy, yet profitable copy of their culture.
Which brings up the question: is tourism a positive influence to a culture? Or will it only leave
behind the remains of something once beloved? Some may say that even with how great of an
impact tourism may bring to, not only the culture, but also the land and lives surrounding it, it
also has the possibility of leaving nothing but poverty and negligence behind, no trace of a true,
Many people use tourism as a sort of cry for help when their culture is dying out or in
need of assistance. With the help of tourism, unique cultures and heritages can be preserved,
even spread for all to see, which can create an overall sense of pride and determination to further
keep the culture (Simm). As more and more people know of its existence, and if it proves to be
profitable, adverts left and right will pop up all around the world, notifying other people of this
new way of living that's unlike their own. This usually helps generate the money needed to keep
the culture around and to fix any problems that may have been caused by it. This can already be
seen in action in Luang Prabang, Laos, a monk city that was dying out until it recently saved
Spirit", lost its authenticity, lost its meaning (Mydans). As the monks walk out of their
monasteries, they're treated as nothing less than a herd of rhinos as groups of tourists run out and
take photos, shoving food into their faces, and just being noisy. This disrupts such a normally
peaceful tradition that's been with these monks for years. Eventually, the spirit will be replaced
by some staged variation, used as a gimmick for money and to seem more modern.
Not only does it suck away the authenticity that's been built up for ages, but it also causes
locals to relocate from their homes, homes they most likely lived in for centuries, all for
temporary hotels and private beaches (Simm). The very people that offered them to witness their
culture, pushed aside as if they were only needed to get the business going, now homeless.
On the up side, however, while bringing in awareness to an area, it also has the chance to
provide schooling to children in need and helps them with any research they desire (Childs). Not
only children can partake in this too, adults from all over can travel and learn about a new culture
and heritage they heard about thanks to other tourists, thus broadening their view of the world as
a whole. Witnessing how other people interact with each other, what their traditions are like, the
tales and stories they created about the world, everything that defines that culture. People have
the chance to learn new things, share it with their friends, and to an extent, this makes it seem
like that culture will never die, not when its way of life is passed around and shared from country
to country.
And when thinking environmentally, tourism has the power to bring a certain area (or
culture) to light by helping promote, preserve, and secure it, making sure it stays so other people
in the future can view it, thus boosting the industry (Simm). When the focus is placed on the
environment, the usual center point in a culture, people will become more and more aware on
whether it needs to be saved or not. The money generated could help with things such as saving
an ecosystem or providing fresh water to a place currently suffering with a drought, possibly
even maintaining a reservation and/or national park. And when this is done, it improves the
overall outlook of the setting, further contributing to the exotic home-away-from-home aesthetic
some places are looking for. When placed in a situation that deals primarily with the
environment of an area, it truly benefits all who encircle it, the industry gains more profits, the
culture has a home it can be proud of, and it also helps preserve environments.
However, tourism actually causes the opposite. Instead of helping with preserving an
environment, studies have shown that tourism can assist with the very same issues that harms the
environment. With the fun of travelling growing more and more, the outcomes of pollution
causes an increase in environmental issues around the area, which evidently leads to a decline in
tourism (Simm). More gas emissions, more CO2 released, more garbage thrown out like its
nothing of value, left to pile up over time, even more deforestation to make room for stuffy
hotels and shops. Eventually, the tourism-based economy will go down as less and less tourists
visit the area, causing little-to-no-money be given back in support of the actual culture. An
example of this would be in India, specifically around the area of the Dal Lake, also known as
Srinagar, a "once pristine" lake "now covered with animal carcasses, sewage and weeds." (Roy).
Thanks to the ever-growing need for hospitality surrounding the area, hotels and lodges have
been built alongside the bank of the lake, where they conveniently dispose their waste into,
harming not only its marine ecosystem, but also to all the above ground animals that depends on
Though if one were to look at it on a more economic scale, then it would make sense that
as tourism gets bigger in an area, so does the need for jobs supplying the interests of all the
tourists coming into the country. As this continues, the economy increases as well, which leads
to an even greater need of tourism (Simm). This also benefits any student just getting started ith
the working world. With a massive influx of people looking to buy things like goods and
services when they're out on vacation, so does the need for workers, stockers, etc. More jobs
filled lead to a better economy, which leads to more money being made that has a chance to be
And yet, they do. The money generated from the tourism-centric economy rarely ever
goes back into the communities. Normally the money circles back to the big-name industries
that supplies the hotels and lodges and other attractions that entices people to travel there
(Simm). At this point, if people are only vacationing in an area purely for the attractions
constructed by monopolies, then the culture that built the entire economy in the first place is long
gone, now replaced with a plastic copy, easily bendable and pleasing to look at from afar.
As would be expected, tourism has the chance to do good to, not just the culture, but also
the area encompassing whether this be from a social, educational, environmental, and
economical standpoint. Socially, tourism can assist with the preservation of cultures that seem to
be dying out while environmentally, it helps preserve the land centered around said culture, such
as rainforests, fields, mountains, etc.. Also, speaking economically, people recognizing said
culture means an increase in the need for jobs, helping out any locals who look for a way to
make a living. Alongside that, the more the people are interested in said culture, the more they'll
And yet, it seems that the negatives outweigh the positives, for what truly is a culture is
all that's left is some cash-grab. Yes, it may help preserve he culture and the land around, but
what's left to save if its all been pished to the side like mud to make room for 5-star rated hotels
and artificial beaches, the surroundings filed to the brim with pollution. And yes, an increased
awareness may lead to a boost in a country's economy, but if that money doesn't lookp back
around towards providing for the culture, then won't that awareness die down, husly leading to a
recession. Not to mention how simple it becomes for sex labor to thrive once an area becomes
well-known enough. Worst of all, tourism causes a culture to lose its authenticity, only providing
Going into this I immediately knew which side I was on, personally seeing how tourism
has affected my own culture, yet I was still curious as to how someone could possibly find
something positive with it. As I researched and learned more, reading up on several other
accounts of people with situations similar to mine, I found it harder and harder to be so
supportive of my side. On one hand, fake culture and a capitalistic cash-grab, on the other,
Nonetheless, running a culture dry till there's nothing left proves itself to be a lot worse
when compared to something as meager as awareness. This can be so easily avoided, however,
should the industry be more considerate of where it stems from and treats it with more respect.
Tourism, when it's done right, help increase the reason why investors and corporations should do
things like help with sewage and water resources. Not only would this benefit the industry, but
also the culture within the area no less the area itself.
Another simple solution would be finding a sort of middle ground between the rapidly
growing need for tourism and the preservation of culture. Take the nation of Oman, who recently
began melding their traditions with the way of modern life. Unlike the big name countries of
Arabia, like Egypt and India, the nation of Oman has balanced their culture and modernity, not
letting their identity be rewritten yet still attracting tourists (PRI's World). Because an entire
nation has attempted this, and such a method actually works, then it is proven that this soltuion
Childs, Carolyn. "Culture and Heritage Tourism." MyTravelResearch. N.p., 09 June 2015. Web.
13 Oct. 2016.
"The History of Indigenous Peoples and Tourism." Cultural Survival Quarterly Magazine June
Hoi An Centre for Monuments Managements and Preservation. Impact: The Effect of Tourism on
Culture and the Environment in Asia and the Pacific: Alleviating Poverty and Protecting
Lao PDR. Bangkok, Thailand: UNESCO Bangkok, Asia and Pacific Regional Bureau for
Mydans, Seth. "Tourism Saves a Laotian City but Saps Its Buddhist Spirit." The New York
Times. The New York Times, 14 Apr. 2008. Web. 05 Apr. 2017.
Olsen, Daniel H. "Issues in Cultural Tourism Studies." Journal of Cultural Geography 23.1
"Oman Is Fusing Its Traditional Culture with Modern Touches... and Pulling in Tourists." PRI's
World 28 Nov. 2014: n. pag. Student Resources in Context. Web. 17 Oct. 2016.
"Positive And Negative Impacts Of Tourism Tourism Essay." UKEssays. N.p., 23 Mar. 2015.
Robinson, Mike, Pr, and David Picard, Dr. Tourism, Culture, and Sustainable Development.