The document discusses several cases involving intellectual property law:
1. Samsung invented a cellular phone that can play MP3s and applied for a patent. The invention is patentable because it combines existing elements of a cell phone and MP3 player into a new, useful product.
2. Lucky Me sued Nissin for trademark infringement for using the phrase "Ang Sarap" in its new product after Lucky Me had registered the trademark for its own product. Nissin is guilty of infringement because "Ang Sarap" is a fanciful trademark capable of exclusive use.
3. A university law library made a copy of a book it received as a donation in order to preserve the original for lending. This
The document discusses several cases involving intellectual property law:
1. Samsung invented a cellular phone that can play MP3s and applied for a patent. The invention is patentable because it combines existing elements of a cell phone and MP3 player into a new, useful product.
2. Lucky Me sued Nissin for trademark infringement for using the phrase "Ang Sarap" in its new product after Lucky Me had registered the trademark for its own product. Nissin is guilty of infringement because "Ang Sarap" is a fanciful trademark capable of exclusive use.
3. A university law library made a copy of a book it received as a donation in order to preserve the original for lending. This
The document discusses several cases involving intellectual property law:
1. Samsung invented a cellular phone that can play MP3s and applied for a patent. The invention is patentable because it combines existing elements of a cell phone and MP3 player into a new, useful product.
2. Lucky Me sued Nissin for trademark infringement for using the phrase "Ang Sarap" in its new product after Lucky Me had registered the trademark for its own product. Nissin is guilty of infringement because "Ang Sarap" is a fanciful trademark capable of exclusive use.
3. A university law library made a copy of a book it received as a donation in order to preserve the original for lending. This
Samsung invented a cellular phone that can also play digital
music or MP3s. It applied for the issuance of letters patent. a. The invention is not patentable because it is a combination of old functions which does not produce a new result. b. The invention is patentable because it is a new product which is beneficial to the public. c. The invention is not patentable because Samsung is a foreign corporation and it should file its application in its home country. d. The invention is patentable because it combines existing elements, a cellular phone and a digital music player, and produces a new and useful result, namely, the convenience of having two gadgets in one.
2. Lucky Me registered its trademark, “Ang Sarap Pancit Palabok”
with the Intellectual Property Office. Nissin subsequently introduced its new product, “Ang Sarap Pinoy Ramen”. Lucky Me sued for trademark infringement. a. Nissin is not guilty of trademark infringement because the trademark “Ang Sarap” is descriptive, hence not capable of exclusive appropriation. b. Nissin is not guilty of trademark infringement because its product, Pinoy Ramen, belongs to a different category from Lucky Me’s product, Pancit Palabok. c. Nissin is guilty of trademark infringement because it did not register its trademark “Ang Sarap Pinoy Ramen”. d. Nissin is guilty of trademark infringement because the trademark “Ang Sarap” is fanciful and arbitrary, hence capable of exclusive appropriation.
3. Center Book Store is the publisher of the book Legal Journal. It
donated one copy to the Library of the U.E. College of Law. The Library, in order to preserve the original book, reproduced one copy of the Journal for lending to the University’s students for room use. Is the U.E. Law Library liable for copyright infringement? a. No. The reproduction is consistent with fair use. b. Yes. Only the National Library is allowed to reproduce books and other works. c. No. The copy of the Journal is marked “For Room Use Only” and is therefore not made available to the public outside of the Library. d. Yes. The law only allows a library to photocopy a book if it is fragile or rare.
4. Which among the following is not a function of the Bangko Sentral
ng Pilipinas? a. As official depositary of the Philippine government. b. As financial adviser of the Philippine government. c. As fiscal agent of the Philippine government. d. As the watchdog of government funds.
5. No. 1 – A bank may be may lend to a single borrower more than
fifteen (15%) of the bank’s unimpaired capital. No. 2 – A deposit in a bank in foreign currency may be inquired into provided the depositor gives his consent, orally or in writing. a. Both are false. b. Both are true. c. No. 1 is true; no. 2 is false. d. No. 1 is true; no. 2 is false.