Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Approved
Accepted
December, 197 9
U ''••-• -'
i9Y?. ^ ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
11
TABLE OF CONTENTS
page
Acknowledgements ii
List of Illustrations v
INTRODUCTION 1
Location of Study Area 2
Previous Work 4
Methods of Investigation 6
Geologic Setting 8
Pierre Shale 10
General Characteristics 10
Lithic Characteristics 15
Prodelta Facies 15
Distal Bar Subfacies 14
Offshore Facies 15
Lower Shoreface Subfacies 18
Depositional Environment 19
Trinidad Sandstone 22
General Characteristics 22
Lithic Characteristics 25
Distributary Mouth Bar Subfacies 25
Destructional Bar 25
Distributary Channel Subfacies 27
Shoreface Facies 28
Middle Shore Subfacies 28
Upper Shoreface-Beach Subfacies 28
111
Depositional Environment 50
Distributary Mouth Bar 50
Destructional Phase 52
Distributary Channel 54
Shoreface 54
Middle Shoreface 34
Upper Shoreface - Beach 35
Vermejo Formation 36
General Characteristics 36
Lithic Characteristics 56
Delta Plain Facies 36
Back-Barrier Facies 42
Depositional Environment 43
Delta Plain 43
Back-Barrier 47
Summary of Depositional Environments 51
Conclusion - 56
References Cited 59
IV
LIST OF ILLUSTRA.TIONS
Page
Figure 1. Location map of the study area 3
Figure 2. Stratigraphic cross section
southwest of Trinidad 11
Figure 3. Stratigraphic cross section
northwest of Trinidad 12
Figure 4. Pierre Shale and Trinidad Sandstone
near the Trinidad Dam 14
Figure 5. Wavy bedding in the Pierre Shale. . . . 14
Figure 6. Load-flow structure in the Pierre
Shale 17
Figure 7. Ripple laminations and Ophiomorpha
burrow in the Pierre Shale. '. . . . . . 17
Figure 8. Ophiomorpha burrows in the Trinidad
Sandstone T 24
Figure 9. Destructional unit in the Trinidad
Sandstone 26
Figure 10. Distributary channel sandstone in
the Trinidad Sandstone 26
Figure 11. Rosselia burrows in the Trinidad
Sandstone 29
Figure 12. Tabular, planar crossbeds in the
Trinidad Sandstone 31
Figure 13. Fossil beach placer in the Trinidad
Sandstone 31
Figure 14. Rose diagram of the Trinidad Sandstone
distributary channel crossbeds 33
Figure 15. Rose diagram of the Trinidad Sandstone
distributary channel crossbeds 55
Figure 16. Stratigraphic cross section west
of Trinidad 57
V
Figure 17. Slump blocks in the Vermejo
Formation 39
Figure 18. Parallel and cross laminations
in the Vermejo Formation 39
Figure 19. Crevasse-splay and coal deposits
in the Vermejo Formation 41
Figure 20. Viburnum leaf in the Vermejo
Formation 41
Figure 21. Crevasse-splay, overbank and
coal deposits in the Vermejo
Formation 45
Figure 22. Channel sandstone, splay sandstone,
shale and coal deposits in the
Vermejo Formation 45
Figure 2 3. Overbank deposits in the Vermejo
Formation 46
Figure 24. Depositional model of delta plain
facies 49
Figure 25. Composite stratigraphic section
of the Pierre Shale, Trinidad
Sandstone and Vermejo Formation,
in the study area 52
Figure 26. Depositional model of the Pierre
Shale, Trinidad Sandstone and
Vermejo Formation in the study area. . . 54
VI
INTRODUCTION
COLORADO
_c^_
^STUDY AREA
105 104
37 45 - _j
RATON BASIN
N
STUDY
\ AREA
COLQ^DO __
37^
NEW/MEXICO
20 KM
• STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION
General Characteristics
10
11
1 I
UJ
;f.-
OJ
^
^
0)
•H
a, CD
(-1
CD +J
r^
4-J 4->
03
<-M
O •V •
C TS
C/)
o Ctj
to/:• H ^
r 1
-t-J • H
•H
& >—^
CT3
c
•H
C ^ ^
o O H
?H IX,
u '•+-1
•M o o
3 •'-~l
O <v • p
<D ^ <u
s tf)
x: !D ->
4-> ^
•M
M-i X5 3
O c O
:C '/5
C
o •\ t/^
•H <D V
+-> C 1—4
o 4-> O •f-l
111
CD
t/1 71
T3 UO
to
(f) CO
o
O 7^ 4->
5-1
U 13 rH
CO
U '"C A
•r-( • -^ c:
.'-4
G cd
< ^-/ P-* H ^
X UJ
ITUS
v-:J f-i
en Q en
^ H 'T3
UJ CJj :«
j— •r-( «i f
T3
en < cc UJ o 4-) V • H
D K -J X 03 — (
O y- UJ < Q. !-i .TJ • -H
UJ UJ 2 Q X < •M j : : i-^
AND
00 c/: .
DIFFERE
RBONAC
RATIGR
NDSTON
RROWS
AINED
.RINE
AL
<3. h-
< o < 2 '3: Z)
«o o o 13 o 2 oa en
•-V
D D > —
DELTA PLAIN
40 FT 2
I Ml
Lithic Characteristics
Prodelta Facies
The prodelta facies of the Pierre Shale exposed
west and southwest of Trinidad, consists mainly of black
to dark gray friable shales. Remnant bedding planes are
present but have been destroyed or obscured by intense
bioturbation. The facies is a coarsening-upward
sequence which displays friable shales in the lower part
grading upward into interbedded shale and siltstone
sequence. Macerated plant fragments locally form very
thin carbonaceous laminations along bedding planes
throughout the sequence. Calcareous concretions that
range in size from 5 by 2 1/2 feet to a few inches in
diameter occur in few localities.
Thin layers of siltstone increase in both thickness
and frequency near the top of this facies. The thick-
ness of the siltstone ranges from a few inches to 22
feet. The increase in the frequency of occurrence of
siltstone in the upper part of this facies is shown
in Fi£ure 4. Bioturbation in the form of trails ani
14
Offshore Facies
The offshore facies of the Pierre Shale, which is
17
Depositional Environment
General Characteristics
Lithic Characteristics
Destructional Bar
The destructional bar of the Trinidad Sandstone is
a tan, very fine to fine grained clay rich sandstone. It
grades laterally to thin laminated silty sandstone,
interbedded with dark gray siltstones and black shales.
The destructional bar sandstones are intensely burrowed
by Ophiomorpha as in Figure 9. Any internal structures
present in the sandstone during deposition have been
destroyed by the numerous burrows. The basal contact is
a low relief undulating surface. Wavy bedding is present
at the contacts between the interbedded siltstone and
sandstone. Carbonaceous debris in the bedding plane and
log imprints are common in the interbedded portion.
A higher percentage of clay matrix was observed
in the petrographic analysis as compared to the surround-
ing distributary mouth bar sands. The intense burrowing
of marine organisms probably aided in the clay rich
26
m
•-*v-
^ £,. a A.
Depositional Environment
Destructional Bar
Coleman and Gaglinano (1964) described the occurrence
of a destructional bar in a deltaic complex, when river
load is redistributed to a new location, allowing marine
processes to destroy old delta deposits. The significant
total lack of fluvial outflow of detrital sediments
results in reworking of previously deposited sediments bv
marine processes. Cotter (19:^5) reported the presence of
a deltaic destructional zone as having the appearance of
33
N
A
N
A
Distributary Channel
The erosional basal contact, conglomeratic base,
and fining upward of grain size of the sandstone indicate
a channel origin. High angle crossbeds represent the
high energy flow in the distributary channels. Lateral
migration of the channels is indicated by development of
point bars. The shale and siltstone infilling of some
channels are probably results of localized abandonment
of that channel. A rose diagram (Figure 15), constructed
from the crossbeds shows southeast and northeast transport
directions, with the latter being the prominent direction.
Shoreface
Middle Shoreface
The presence of Ophiomorpha and Rosselia burrows
dictate a quiet, littoral-shallow environment. Good
sorting and lack of effective grain size may explain the
absence of well defined burrows (Davies, Ethridge and
Berg, 1971), as well as lack of distinct structures.
Longshore currents subparallel to the shoreline were
probably the main transport and depositional medium. The
structureless nature of this sandstone is characteristic
35
of a middle shoreface environment, although associated
environments are key factors in defining this as the
middle shoreface.
General Characteristics
Lithic Characteristics
<
-J
a.
O
< l.^-^^^^^^^^^^^^^^''*''^-«SSXX^VX»D<W^ UJ
or
UJ UJ
Q >
UJ
COAL AND
< CARBONACEOUS SHALE
<
X
o
n UNDIFFERENTiATED
GRAINED DETRITUS
FINE-
cc:
cr I-
<
I- SANDSTONE
a: SILL r 40 FT
I Mi
I STRATIGRAPHIC SECTION I
Back-Barrier Facies
Depositional Environment
Delta Plain
Back-Barrier
The thick sections of shale and siltstone, very thin
coal and carbonaceous shale beds, thin channel sandstones.
48
and thin crevasse-splay sandstones were observed to be
present in the back-barrier. Association of these
deposits with the underlying offshore and lower shoreface
deposits of the Pierre Shale and shoreface deposits of
the Trinidad Sandstone, and the contemporaneous deposi-
tion of this facies with the delta plain facies of the
Vermejo Formation suggest that the Vermejo Formation in
the southeastern part of the study area was deposited
in a back-barrier environment.
The Vermejo Formation to the south of the study
area, in the vicinity of Raton, New Mexico, has been
described as a coastal swamp complex (Leighton, 19'9)
with thick accumulations of coals being infrequently
cut by river estuary sandstones. In the Raton area,
Pillmore (1969) associated the large elongate character-
istics of the coal beds in the lower part of the Vermejo
Formation as back-barrier deposits. These coal beds
show elongate orientations to the shoreline marked by the
Trinidad Sandstone's beach deposit. These observations
are similar to the swamps in modern strandplain (Hoyt,
Henry, and Howard, 1966) in southeast U.S., in which
the peat-forming environment forms at the back of the
beach-barrier complex. The long dim.ension of these peat-
forming swamps are parallel to the length of the beach-
barrier complex. Pillmore and Leighton noted that the
coals in the lower part of the Vermejo Formation in the
49
o
CD
s
CD
>
CD
s:
O
•J)
-M
C
0)
5
o
> ^
C r-H
•H
C^H CD
cti V
<D
o
o <+.
t—I CD
<V - H
T3 <+-(
O -H
o
03 ^—'
o c:
•H o
• H 4->
(/^ 03
O =
CD O
J-
3
tu
50
deposition,
A northwest-southeast trending paleoshoreline with
dominant longshore currents to the southeast is inter-
preted from crossbed measurements of the Trinidad
sandstone. Crossbed measurements within the Vermejo
Formation showed no preferred orientation due to the
random meandering of the distributary channels through the
delta plain. Matuszezak (1969) also concluded that the
Trinidad shoreline trend was from northwest to southeast
based on the orientation of heavy mineral zones, ripple
mark directions and an isopach map of the Trinidad
Sandstone, According to Weimer and Land (1975), the
^1
O
LU
BACK- T-:L-1-T DELTA
QZ
BARRIER UJ PLAIN
>
P \ ^ ^ . | DISTRIBUTARY
CO
CHANNEL
I T • -r••Tr»^l
BEACH-
< . "vr • .
BAR > ^
V v^.t>'^ DELTA
FRONT
"V.
cr
r - 5 0 F T. IT
UJ
CD
03
a
CO D
u,
<v :T3
r-t
U X
V TJ
•H D
CU -(-'
t/i
CD
r-"
CD
4-» ^C
•M
'-M
r^
c
•H
r-^
<D
c
T3 o
•r-t
c: •^J
03
'-' £
05 J-
r~ O
O Ci-
•—'
•(-J O
• r-^ • 1 — %
(f) CD
o E
r-\
M
o" <D
^-' >
o
(^
CD
i-i
C20
0 :D
'''''pet;'''Geor'R.nf °^v.
Fetr. Geol, Bull., '^^o'"^ '^^^
49, no. 11,^^^i^^'' ^ ' Assoc.
p. 2011-2075.
59
60
Hills, R.C., 1889, Elmoro Quadrangle, Colorado: U.S.
Geol. Suve., Atlas Folio 5, p, 6,
Houston, R,S, and J.F. Murphy, 1977, Depositional environ
ment of Upper Cretaceous black sandstones of the
western interior: U.S. Geol. Survey Prof. Paper
994-A.
Hoyt, J.H., Henry, V.J., Howard, J.D., 1966, Pleistocene
and Holocene sediments, Sapelo Island, Georgia and
vicinity: G.S.A., Field Trip Guidebook, vol. 1,
p,6-27.
Johnston, R.G., and G.H. Wood, Jr., 1956, Stratigraphy
of Upper Cretaceous and Tertiary rocks of Raton
Basin, Colorado and New Mexico: Am. Assoc. Petr.
Geol. Bull., V. 40, p. 707-721.
Kay, M., 1951, North American Geosynclines: Geol. Soc.
Amer., Memoir 48, pp. 143.
Knowlton, F.H., 1917, Fossil Floras of the Vermejo and
Raton formation of Colorado and New Mexico: U.S.
Geol. Survey Prof. Paper 101, p. 223-455.
Lee, W.T., 1917, Geology of the Raton Mesa and other
regions in Colorado and New Mexico: U.S. Geol.
Surv. Prof. Paper 101, p. 1-221.
Leighton, V.L., 1979, Depositional Environments and
petrography of the Trinidad Sandstone and related
formations, Raton area. New Mexico: Unpub. M.b.
Thesis, Colorado State University.
Lessard, R.H. and W. Bejnar, 19^6, Geology of the Las
Vegas area: New Mexico Geol. Soc. Guidebook, - th
Field Conf,, p. 217-226.
Manzolillo, C , 1976, Stratigraphy of ^j^fj^^^j^^^^^^^^
stone, Trinidad area, Las Animas -o^^^^' ^°t '^^^°'
Unpub. M.S. Thesis (T-1847) , Colorado School of
Mines .
Matuszezak. R.A., 1969, Trinidad sandstone interpreted,
evaluated in Raton Basin, Colorado - New Mexi.o.
The Mountain Geologist, v. 6, no. i, P- J-ii' '•- •