Professional Documents
Culture Documents
‘Big Data’
Flavio Pinto – Sales Manager | Gilat Satellite Networks | April 2015
1
Gilat – Boundless Communications
• Gilat at a Glance
• HTS Overview
• Gilat’s Answer – SEII-C
Enterprise Cellular SOTM SOTM
Finance Gilat • HTS References
& Consumer Backhaul Commercial Defense
broadband
2
Gilat at a Glance
3
Wide Range of Products and Integrated Solutions
VSAT Network System BUCS & SSPAs SOTM Antennas Terminals
& BlackRay 71
Hubs Remote Units
Ground Airborne SR 71
SkyEdge II IP
Ku-Band
WebEnhance
SR 250/300
CellEdge SatTrooper
Pro
ER 5000/6000
SkyEdge II-c Ground Airborne
Taurus
Ka-Band
SR 5000
Accent BlackRay Parabolic
NetEdge
Multi-Star Gemini Custom
Gateway X-Band Integration
ER 7000
Capricorn Libra
NOC Operation
Turnkey Projects
4
Gilat Business Units
Commercial Division
Mobility Division
Services Division
5
HTS Overview
6
HTS Basics
• What is HTS and how it is related to Ka Band?
• Ka/HTS/MSB Ecosystems?
7
Is HTS always Ka?
8
HTS and Ka
9
HTS and Ka
10
What is better, Ka or Ku?
• Rainfade, bigger problem for Ka-band!
Reality: Cannot deny physics but larger antennas (same size as Ku), ACM, and
other technologies can minimize except for most demanding applications. Millions
of subscribers already using Ka-band satellite based services today.
11
What is better, Ka or Ku?
• Ka has more total throughput, so is cheaper per bit!
Reality: Technically, higher frequency Ka allows a higher bit rate than Ku.
Reality: Cost per bit is determined by other factors than just frequency including
signal power (EIRP), number of spots/frequency reuse, transponder size, antenna
size, etc, etc.
• Ku is backwards compatible!
Reality: Largerly true today, but it becomes ever less of a factor over time.
Reality: The real decision factor is “Total Cost of Ownership” and this can greatly
vary from case to case.
12
Ka specific challenges
What is better, Ka or Ku?
Conclusions:
- Both Bands have a role to play. For each service provider the
decision will be dependent on their own factors.
- Applications / Clients on which the business plan is built
- Considerations of using existing infrastructure
- Access to spectrum
13
Why everyone is talking
HTS now?
14
HTS vs. Traditional Capacity Demand
Capacity Availability by Frequency Band
0 Gbps
55 Gbps
159 Gbps
31 Gbps
8 Gbps
1 Gbps
5 Gbps
Global /Maritime:
0 Gbps
15 Gbps
(+15 Gbps)
79 Gbps
(+24 Gbps)
169 Gbps
(+10 Gbps) 72 Gbps
(+41 Gbps)
39 Gbps
(+21 Gbps)
>30 HTS
Satellites by ’16
- HTS
70 Gbps
(+69 Gbps) 60 Gbps
- Multi-mission (+55 Gbps)
Global /Maritime:
27 Gbps
(+27 Gbps)
2018
SES 12 Koreasat 5A GSAT-KA AzerSpace 2 ViaSat 3 Koreasat 7
2016 - 2017
Telesat Anik Kacific Telesat 18V Aonesat 1 CS-16 Eutelsat 65 Intelsat32e Jupiter 2
G2
2015
Arabsat 6E Jabiru 1 BADR BADR 7 Congosat 1
Hispasat AG1 Inmarsat V F2 Intelsat 29E NBN 1A NBN 1B O3b x 4 Superbird 8 Yamal 601 Inmarsat V F3
Hylas 3
ABS 2* Astra 2G Astra 5B* AsiaSat 8 ChinaSat 15 Eutelsat 3B* Express AT-1* Express AT-2* Express AM-6
2014
Express AM-7 Express AM-8 Express AM4R* GSAT 11 G-SAT 14* O3b x 4* Thor 7 Turksat 4A Turksat 4B
Confidential Hybrid HTS (Ku/C/Ka Satellite) Full HTS Ka-Band Failed launch * Launched
HTS Forecasts - Euroconsult
• HTS capacity supply will nearly triple over the next three years alone, from 600 Gbps in
2014 to 1,720 Gbps in 2017 (FWD + RTN)
• More than 100 new HTS payloads and satellites are expected to launch over the next
decade
HTS – Broadband vs. non-Broadband Applications
• Excluding Broadband, more than 2/3 of HTS bandwidth demand will come from
outside NAM/WEU.
• Non-broadband applications will make up over 75% of HTS revenue growth to 2023
Rest of World
38%
North America
& Western
Europe
62%
Source : NSR
New Entrants – Unknown Effect
LEOs
What is HTS’s value?
23
Widebeam vs Multi-spot beam
Wide Spot
• Satellite Cost: $150M-$250M • Satellite Cost: X2 = $400M - $500M
• 24-48 C/Ku Band 36Mhz TPX • 40-80 Ka 250Mhz-500Mhz Beams
• Requires: 1GHz • Requires: 1-1.5GHz GW Beams
• Throughput: 2Gbps – 4Gbps • Throughput: 40Gbps-60Gbps
MSB is 1/10 cost per bit vs wide beam for lifetime of satellite! 24
HTS Satellites as Enablers
25
Preparing Oil & Gas for HTS
• By 2023, 10% of Connected Oil&Gas sites will be for Exploration and Production,
12% of those will utilize HTS capacity (source NSR).
• Huge HTS capacity projected to fill the sky over the next years Welcome
opportunity for the Oil&Gas / Offshore, where satellite internet demand continues to
escalate. Offshore rigs and platforms around the world are heavy users of satellite
broadband to support their use of voice, video, and data applications - ultimately driving
up the average consumption of bandwidth.
• Typical applications:
• Connection of rigs with onshore production teams
• Safety applications and equipment monitoring to track operation
• Personal connections for crew welfare
• As bandwidth demand increases, Oil & Gas global service providers are facing
pressure from their customers to deliver faster, more efficient networks that provide
higher availability and more capacity – especially in the remote waters of the
offshore oil and gas market.
• HTS and O3b will add an additional 18 Gbps of throughput to Energy markets by
2022 – driven by higher provisioning and Inservice Unit growth.
• Key applications = enhanced oil recovery (EOR), crew-welfare, business
applications, mining automation, more requirements for data reporting.
• Traditional FSS Capacity will still exist to provide high-redundancy, but hybrid
solutions utilizing least-cost/highest throughput schemes continue to become the
status quo…. Even with C-band users.
• Wireless Backhaul and Energy to represent solid HTS markets.
27
How HTS changes the
ecosystem?
28
Traditional ecosystem
Network Internet
Internet
Satellite Direct & End
Service Service
Service
Operator Resellers Users
Operator Provider
Provider
Customer acquisition,
Satellite Ops, Hub baseband, VSAT
Define Services,
Equipment, Internet, GW Ops, 2nd-level HD
1st-Level HD
30
Ecosystem models
31
Gilat’s Answer – SkyEdge II-C
32
One Network – All Application
Beam Switching, Full Terminals
Mobility
Usage Service Plans SCPC , 100Mbps / 100Mbps
IP Trunks
Consumer
Broadband
Internet
Any number of
Satellite Beams
OSS/BSS
TotalNMS M&C
Internet
ONE Network
Management
System
Ka Ku C
• High Availability
• High Integration
• Unattended Operations
• Consumer
• Enterprise
• Machine to Machine (M2M)
• Cellular Backhauling (CBH)
• IP Trunking
• Mobility
Ultra High
High Speed
Performance
Outbound 40 Mbps 200 Mbps
41
Partnering with HTS Providers
• Agreements in place with SES, Thaicom, Inmarsat, O3B, JCP
• Recently with Eutelsat and Intelsat.
– Value Proposition:
• Multiple applications on same platform (Broadband, Enterprise, Cellular Backhaul,
Mobility,..)
JCP
42
Strategic Partnership with Inmarsat
• Fixed solutions on Global Xpress constellation
• Inmarsat resellers to offer Gilat VSATs globally
• Networks operated by Gilat
First trial
(Brazil)
available on
April 2015
O3bEnergy
Increasing communication needs in the O&G is being driven by
new applications, the regulatory environment and the increasing
distance from the shore and depth where such platforms are
operating.
46
Thank You
flavio@gilat.com