WCDMA Ra Dio Freque Ncy Optimization

WCDMA Ra dio
Fre que ncy Optimiza tion
www.huawei.com
Copyright © 2007 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

Fore word
 RF (Radio Frequency) optimization is the most important
step to ensure the quality of the network.
 RF optimization will solve network problems related to
neighbor cell list, coverage and interference.
Copyright © 2007 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All rights reserved. Page2
Obje ctive s
 Upon completion of this course, you will be able to:

Know the steps of RF optimization

Know how to solve the RF problems caused by neighbor cell
list, poor coverage and interference
Conte nts
 RF Optimization Workflow
 Typical Problems Analysis in RF optimization
RF Optimiza tion Workflow
Start
Preparation:
 Set the optimization target
 Divide the optimization cluster
 Draw out the test route line
 Prepare the DT tools
Data Collection:
 DT test Adjustment:
 Indoor DT test  Engineering parameters adjust
 RNC configuration data  Neighbor cell list adjust
The DT result is satisfied N

Problem Analysis
with optimization target?  neighbor cell list
 poor coverage
Y  pilot pollution
 handover
RF optimization  interference
finished
 Set RF optimization target, for example:
Reference
Target Item Remark
Value
CPICH Ec/Io ≥ -12dB & RSCP ≥
Coverage Probability ≥95%
-95dBm
CPICH Ec/Io ≥ -12dB ≥95% Scanner result
CPICH RSCP ≥
≥95% Scanner result
-95dBm
SHO Percentage 30%-40%
Pilot pollution
≤5%
Percentage
 RF optimization clusters division

Cluster is the area for one time drive test

One cluster should contains 15 to 25 sites

Cluster division should consider the following factor, such
as:
 Ter
rain
 Tr
aff
ic
 Rout
eline
 Preparation for DT (drive test)

Hardware
 Tes
tphone

S
canner
 GPS

Software
 Dr
ivet
ests
oft
war
e, f
orex
ampl
e, GENEXPr
obe
 Dr
ivetes
tpos
tpr
oces
ssof
twar
e, f
orex
ampl
e, GENEX
As
sis
tant
Conte nts
 Preparation of RF Optimization
Conte nts

RF case related to neighbor cell list

RF case related to bad coverage
 RF case related to interference
Ca s e 1
 Description

In DT, call drop happened

Check the signaling trace at UE side
Call Drop
After call drop, begin
to read
system information
Ca s e 1
 Data analysis
 Check cell information from UE active set and cell information
from scanner at call drop points.
From UE From Scanner
No SC
170 cell!!
Why?
Ca s e 1
 Data analysis
 Checking monitor set
Check monitor set for
the scramble measured
by scanner
SC 170 is not in monitor set

Missing neighbor cell
 Delayed handover
Ca s e 1
 Data analysis

Check the latest measurement control
Search for the latest intra-

frequency measurement control
Call drop
point
Ca s e 1
Measurement ID is 1. It is Intra-
frequency measurement control
The primary scramble

of the cell is 6
Check the list of intra-frequency

neighbor cell in measurement
control and no SC 170
Ca s e 1
 Solution

Add neighbor cells in neighbor cell list
 Summary
 In the beginning stage of network, it is very common that
missing neighbor cell cased cause call drop.

Analysis with signaling procedure is the common way to find
and solve the problem

Some problems can be avoided if the Combined Neighbor Cell
Algorithm is switched on.
Ca s e 2
 Phenomenon description
 In DT, call drop
happened at cell A
Cell B (PSC277)
Cell A
(PSC58)
Ca s e 2
 Phenomenon description

In Cell A, UE keeps reporting PSC 277 1A event.

RNC received this event and send Active Set Update to UE
according to the signaling trace record
 UE send Active Set Update complete to RNC

Then, RNC send Active Set Update to delete PSC 277 from
active set

Finally call drop happened due to RL failure
Ca s e 2
 Problem Analysis

From the signaling trace of DT, it looks like the handover is
complete successfully.

But, according to the signaling trace from CDT, the handover
failed actually.
Ca s e 2

Signaling trace from CDT shows:
UE NodeB RNC
Measurement control (1A Event for PSC 227)
Radio Link Setup
Radio Link Setup Response
Active set update
Active set update complete
Radio Link Failure
Ca s e 2
Cell C (PSC277)

After checking the
neighbor cell list, the
following problem is
found
Cell B (PSC277)

Cell C has the same
PSC as Cell B
Cell A (PSC58)
Ca s e 2

The neighbor cell list shows
Cell ID PSC Cell ID NCell ID
A 58 A C
B 277 C A
C 277
Missing Cell A
configuring Mistake for
(PSC58)
NCell configuring
NCell
Cell B Cell C
(PSC277) (PSC277)
Ca s e 2

Based on the analysis above, the new NodeB is not the one of
cell B, but the one of cell C

Even the cell C prepared resource for UE according to the RNC
command of “Radio Link Setup”, it can not find the UE uplink
signal.
 That does why the “Radio Link Failure” is sent by NodeB
Ca s e 2
 Solution

Change the wrong neighbor cell list
Ca s e 2
 Summary
 Phenomenon for wrong neighbor cell list
 Fr
omDT, r
adiol
inkbr
anc
hisaddedint
oac
tives
et, t
hen
del
etedf
romac
tives
etr
epeat
edl
y.
 S
HO s
ucc
essr
ateisl
ow
 Radiol
inkf
ail
ureisl
owint
hewr
ongneighborc
ell
,for
ex
ampl
e, c
ellCinc
ase2
 Cal
ldr
opishighint
hec
ellwit
hwr
ongneighborc
ell
,for
ex
ampl
e, c
ellAinc
ase2
Ca s e 2
 Summary

About SHO event, UE will only report PSC to RNC in
Measurement Report

RNC will find the right cell according to the neighbor cell list
between cell ID and PSC

This problem is mainly happened in dense urban when is PSC
is reused a lot
Ca s e 3
 Description
14605 (Frequency C)
Call drop rate high
14603 (Frequency A)
14602 (Frequency B) 14031 (Frequency B)
Inter-frequency handover based on capacity
Inter-RAT handover based on coverage
Ca s e 3
 Description

UE is in Cell 14602 with frequency B

When 14602 is in high load level, UE will be handed over to
14603 with another frequency A

When 14603 is in high load level, UE will be handed over to
14605 with frequency C

Because frequency A and C are not used continuously at this
area, UE has to be handed over to Cell 14031 with frequency
B

14603 and 14605 can share the load level, but the call drop
rate in 14603 is very high.
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

Because it’s difficult to do drive test for collecting signaling
trace, the IOS (Information of Subscriber) trace is used.

Based on the analysis for the call dropped UE, there is one
thing is common:
 Bef
orec
alldr
opin24603, al
lUEsinit
iat
edc
ompr
essmode,
ands
endMeas
urementRepor
ttoRNCper
iodic
all
y, but
handoverisnott
rigger
ed.
Ca s e 3
 Analysis
2D Event
Compress
mode
Inter-frequency
measurement
control
Inter-frequency
Measurement
report
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

Open “Inter-frequency Measurement Control”, the Cell 14605
with frequency C is put in the first place

And in the following measurement report, UE only report Cell
14605
 But the cell 14605 cell signal level is lower than -90dBm, which
can not trigger handover, till call drop.
Ca s e 3
 Analysis Cell 14605 with
Frequency C

Measurement Control
Cell 14031 with

Frequency B
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

Measurement Report
Cell 14605 with
Frequency C
Cell 14605 CPICH

& Ec/Io
Ca s e 3
 Question

Why the handover can not be triggered?

Since the network give UE the information of cell 14605 and
cell 14031, Why UE only report cell 14605?

Did UE measure cell 14301, just not report it?
 Or, UE never measure cell 14301, just 14605?
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

UE report cell 14605 CPICH RSCP is 19, which is -96dBm.

After checking the RNC configuration file, this CPICH RSCP
level can not trigger inter-frequency handover

Actually, because cell 14605 and 14603 are in one sector, their
signal level should be same.
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

If UE can report cell 14031, the handover may be triggered

After analyze the compress mode principle, it is found that UE
can only monitor 1 WCDMA frequency in the gap of compress
mode.
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

Because UE can not measure cell 14301 with frequency B,
only monitor cell 14605 with frequency C, and meanwhile cell
14605 and 14603 signal level are same, the call dropped due
to the poor signal of 14605 and 14603

How to make UE monitor cell 14301 with frequency B instead
of 14605 with frequency C?
Ca s e 3
 Solution

Delete the neighbor relation from 14603 with frequency A to

Add the neighbor relation from 14602 with frequency B to
Ca s e 3
 Solution
14605 (Frequency C)
14603 (Frequency A)
14602 (Frequency B) 14031 (Frequency B)
Inter-frequency handover based on capacity
Inter-RAT handover based on coverage
Ca s e 3
 Summary

Do not configure two different frequency neighbor cells in
WCDMA system
Conte nts


RF case related to bad coverage
Ca s e 1
 Description

In drive test for RF optimization, call drop happened in the
circle area
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

After analyze the signal level of this area, the call drop is
caused by discontinuous coverage of the cell with PSC 442
Problem Zone
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

After checking the RF
transmission Antenna
environment, the signal

is blocked by the glass
Call drop
wall
The Wall
Ca s e 1
 Solution

Solution 1: Decrease the downtilt to increase the signal level
 Maybet
hepr
obl
emar
eawil
lbec
omebet
ter
, butduet
othe
wal
l,t
hispr
obl
emmays
til
lex
istnear
by.

Solution 2:Increase the antenna height
 Af
terc
hec
kingt
heins
tal
lat
ionc
ondit
ion, it
’sver
yhar
dto
inc
reas
etheheight
 Eveninc
reas
edt
heheight
,thepr
obl
emmays
til
lex
istduet
o
t
hewal
l.
Ca s e 1
 Solution

Solution 3:
 Movet
heant
ennapos
itionifpos
sibl
e, andt
hemain

Movet dir
ec
heant t
ionant
ennaposennaispar
itiont
or all
elwit
hthes
ideoft
ightabout15met
ers hewal
l
c
ons
ider
ingt
heins
tal
lat
ionc
ondit
ion
Wall
New
Original Position
Position
Ca s e 1
 Solution

Solution 3:
 Aboutt
heant
ennadownt
il
t,t
wos
trat
egiesar
edes
igned.
 Fir
st, 10degr
ees
10 Degree
Ca s e 1
 Solution

Solution 3:
 S
econd, 5degr
ees
5 Degree
Ca s e 1
 Summary

Before RF adjustment, site survey should be done.

Find the problem and the reason, design several strategies for
the adjustment

One time adjustment, and check the performance at the same
time. Adjustment and performance checking should be done at
the same to improve the work efficiency.
Ca s e 2
 Description

In drive test for RF optimization, the area Ec/Io is bad
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Checking the cell distribution at this area
PSC186 PSC184
PSC185
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

One site with 3 cells, PSC184, 185 and 186 cover this area

Two cells, PSC 184 and 185, are separated to two sectors to
cover different direction
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

The area is covered by different cell – PSC 184 and 185

No dominant cell – PSC 184 and 185 is the best cell crossly in
this area
Ca s e 2
 Solution

Change the sector PSC, or combine some sector

Previously, 3 cells
 PS
C184: s
ect
or1&s
ect
or3
 PS
C185: s
ect
or2&s
ect
or4
 PS
C186: s
ect
or5

After adjustment, 2 cells:
 PS
C184: s
ect
or1&s
ect
or3
 PS
C185: s
ect
or4&s
ect
or5
 Del
etes
ect
or2
Ca s e 2
 After adjustment, the drive test for PSC 184 and 185
Ca s e 2
 The comparison result for scanner Ec/Io
Ca s e 2
 The comparison result for UE Ec/Io
Ca s e 2
 Summary

In order to get better coverage performance at the place with
complicated transmission environment, splitter is used to
separate one cell into different sectors to cover different area.

In this case, the sector should be designed reasonably to
control the interference
Ca s e 3
 Description

In drive test for RF optimization, bad Ec/Io is found on the
bridge
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

Check the RSCP value of scanner, the result shows the RSCP
value is good.

Based on this, pilot pollution need be considered in this area.

Check the top N pilot RSCP and Ec/Io in scanner result
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

From the DT result, it shows the RSCP value is strong, but the
Ec/Io is bad.

And the signal level of different cell are very similar.

Find the cells which cover this area
Ca s e 3
 Analysis Site 2 Cell C Site 3 Cell C
Site 1 Cell A
Site 4 Cell C
Site 5 Cell C
Ca s e 3
 Analysis

On the bridge, the signal from different cell can cover this area
due to reflection of the river and no building.

From DT, following cell cover this area:
 S
ite1c
ellA
 S
ite2c
ellC
 S
ite3c
ellC
 S
ite4c
ellC
 S
ite5c
ellC
Ca s e 3

Need to find the
best cell
Site 1 Cell A

Check the map, Site 6
the site 6 is very
near to the
bridge.
Site 4 Cell C
Site 5 Cell C
Ca s e 3
 Analysis
The residence buildings

After checking site 6 RF are much higher than
antenna, which block
environment, it is difficult to the signal of site 6
increase the antenna height or

move site 6 position to avoid
the blocking caused by the
building
Ca s e 3

Then, site 1 cell
A can be the
best cell to Site 1 Cell A
cover this area
Site 4 Cell C
Site 5 Cell C
Ca s e 3

Then, try to
increase the
signal of site 1 Site 1 Cell A
cell A, and
decrease other
cells
 To confirm this, Site 4 Cell C
DT for site 1 cell Site 5 Cell C
A needs to be
done
Ca s e 3
 Solution

Increase the signal of site 1 cell A
 Changet
heant
ennadownt
il
tfr
om10t
o7
 I
ncr
eas
eCPI
CH Txpower1.5dBhigher

Decrease other cell signal – change the antenna downtilt
 Fr
om7t
o10f
ors
ite2c
ellC
 Fr
om5t
o8f
orS
ite3c
ellC
 Fr
om9t
o11f
ors
ite4c
ellC
 Fr
om9t
o11f
ors
ite5c
ellC
Ca s e 3
 Confirmation

After the modification, the DT shows the pilot pollution area
as below
Ca s e 3
 Confirmation

The Ec/Io comparison
After
Before
Ca s e 3
 Summary

To solve the pilot pollution, the following issues has be
considered
 Findt
her
eas
onc
aus
edpil
otpol
lut
ion
– Due to no s trong s igna l
– Due to too much s trong s igna l
 Af
tert
headj
ust
ment
,theDThast
obedoneatt
hisc
lus
ter
t
oconf
ir
mthatnonewpr
obl
emappear
ed
Ca s e 4
 Description
 In DT, video call quality is decreased at the problem
area. Also, the PS call drop happened several times
Problem Area
3G Antenna
2G Antenna
Ca s e 4
 Analysis
 RSCP distribution in DT
Problem
area
Ca s e 4
 Analysis

Ec/Io distribution in DT
Problem
Problem
area
area
Ca s e 4
 Analysis

Checking the RF environment, the antenna is installed on 10-
meter platform

2G and 3G antenna are installed at one platform, but 3G
antenna is a little bit inner than 2G antenna.
 After finishing DT in 2G, signal level is very stable
Ca s e 4
 Analysis

If 3G and 2G antenna are installed at the same place, the
problem may be solved.

The short wall of this platform may block the signal of 3G

Since 2G antenna is near to the border, the wall influence 2G little
Problem Area
3G Antenna Wall
2G Antenna
Ca s e 4
 Solution

Solution 1
 I
ncr
eas
etheant
ennaheightc
ans
olvet
hispr
obl
em

Solution 2
 Movet
heins
tal
lat
ionpl
aceneart
othebor
der

Solution 3
 3Gand2Gus
ethes
amepl
ace
Ca s e 4
 Solution
 Solution 3 is adopted
Ca s e 4
 Question

Do you have other methods?
Ca s e 4
 Summary

Sharing the same installation place for 3G and 2G is
very common, and several strategies can solve the
problem

In this situation, 3G and 2G can share the feeder
system, or can only share the installation platform.

Considering the factors of the installation and related
resource, a easiest and simplest method should be
adopted
Ca s e 5
 Description

In DT, call drop happened a lot in the area
Ca s e 5
 Description

Check the DT information, SC304 is in active set with
the signal level – RSCP -76dBm and Ec/Io -18
 Analysis
 Consider the pilot pollution
 Butonl
y1c
ellinac
tives
etand1Cel
linmonit
or
s
et
 Consider the missing neighbor cell


Butt
hec
ellinmonit
ors
ethasver
ygoodqual
it
y–
RS
CP-65dBmandEc
/Io-6
Ca s e 5
 Analysis

Check the signaling trace at UE side
Before call drop, UE
sends measurement
report to RNC with 1A
event for cell 298
Ca s e 5
 Analysis

Check the signaling trace at RNC side
RNC sent Active Set Update to

UE, but no response. Then, RNC
send release RRC connection –
Call Drop
Ca s e 5
 Analysis

Based on the DT and signaling trace, this call drop
can be take as handover failure
 For example
cel l 56 vs cel l 041
- 10
EcNo
cel l 56
- 20 cel l 041
- 30
t i me
Ca s e 5
 Analysis

Around the corner, the original cell 304 signal level
drop very quickly because of the building
shadowing, and the neighbor cell 298 increase
very quickly.

After UE sent measurement report to RNC, cell
304 has become very bad when RNC sent active
set update.
Ca s e 5
 Adjustment

Since cell 298 has better coverage at this area,
handover can happen earlier

Decrease the coverage performance at this area
– Increase the downtilt from 5 to 9
– Adjust the direction from 0 to 310
 Increase the coverage performance at this area

– Decrease the downtilt from 5 to 4
– Adjust the direction from 300 to 270
Ca s e 5
 Adjustment

Result after adjustment
Handover
area
Handover
Before area After
Ca s e 5
 Adjustment

Comparison of Ec/Io of UE
Before After
Ca s e 5
 Summary

Confirm the corner effect by analyzing signaling
trace at UE and RNC
 About corner effect, Taking the method make the
handover happen earlier, such as RF optimization
 Other method can also adopted

Modify 1A event

Modify CIO (Cell Individual Offset)
Conte nts

 RF case related to bad coverage
Ca s e 1
 Description
 From traffic statistic, the following RTWP problem is found
RNCI VS.MaxRTW VS.MeanRTW
CellId CellName Time(As hour) VS.MinRTWP
d P P
6250 2005-5-16
1 KwongYu1 -74.5 -102.34 -105.3
1 17:00
6250 2006-5-16
1 KwongYu2 -74.3 -94.89 -105.5
2 17:00
6250 2006-5-16
1 KwongYu3 -82 -101.6 -105.4
3 17:00
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Connect to the problem NodeB, and monitor the RTWP
 Cell 62501 RTWP
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Cell 62502 RTWP
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Cell 62503 RTWP
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

The main diversity antenna is interfered seriously
 Can not find any relation between interference and time,
and the interference appears randomly

Check the neighbor site, no interference
 Deduction
 Inter-modulation cause the interference, could be
 I
nter
-modul
ationc
aus
edbybadc
onnec
tor
s
 I
nter
-modul
ationbyGS
M
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Check the RF environment
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Check the RF environment
 No blocking or any reflection due to the glass wall
 The site RF condition is very good
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

2G and 3G share the feeder system
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Check 2G frequency planning
 Sector 1 – 544 with hopping frequency 821
– 544 – 1811.6MHz & 821 – 1867MHz
– 538 – 1808.6MHz & 821 – 1867MHz
– 858 – 1874.4MHz & 821 – 1867MHz
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Calculate the third order intermodulation
 Cell 1 – 1922.4MHz
 Cell 2 – 1925.4MHz
 Cell 3 – 1859.6MHz

Check cell 2 uplink interference
 The interval of 2 interference is
821-544
Ca s e 1
 Analysis

Conclusion
 The third intermodulation of cell 1 and cell 2 is just in WCDMA
uplink band
Ca s e 1
 Solution

Change the hopping frequency of DSC
 Confirmation
 Check the RTWP again, the values are normal
Ca s e 1
 Summary

Characteristics of inner system interference
 The RTWP result are not same at the main and diversity antenna
 The amplitude of interference is big, and the difference is more than 10
dB
 High RTWP will appear in a duration, and will not change so frequently
 High RTWP will not show in a certain time each day, but randomly
Ca s e 2
 Description

In a commercial network of country U, the following RTWP
problem is found from traffic statistic
RNCI RTWP_MEA RTWP_MA RTWP_MI
CellId CellName Time(As hour)
d N X N
201 11912 Aguada_C 2005-11-15 4:00 -93.94 -88.65 -105.66
201 11942 Centenario_C 2005-11-15 4:00 -95.86 -87.65 -105.66
2005-11-15
201 11932 Centro_C -96.62 -93.65 -97.65
17:00
201 11623 Ciudad Vieja_C 2005-11-15 0:00 -96.74 -91 -105.65
2005-11-15
201 11461 Palacio_C -97.1 -96 -104.65
20:00
201 11643 Pocitos_C 2005-11-15 2:00 -97.72 -92.65 -105.65
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Connect to the problem NodeB, and monitor the RTWP
 Take one site as example
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

The main and diversity antenna have the same
interference trend

The different between main and diversity is less than
10dB
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Check the location of the sites with high RTWP
High
Medium
Low
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

All the problem cells are in the third sector of the
NodeB, and the direction is to the northwest

Many cells at this area show high interference, and the
cells with low RTWP are at low place
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Analyze the RTWP in the nearly one month, the
interference shows randomly, but if appears, usually one
whole day, or several days

The interference shows with high traffic, and also with
low traffic. No evidence shows it is related to the traffic
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Maybe the interference comes from outside and the
northwest direction
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Use YBT250 to do the interference checking
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

All the test results show the interference comes from the
same direction – to the country A

But the distance to country A from the test place is
around 50Km to 200Km
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Frequency analysis
 UCount
ryUMTSf
requenc
y
– 1900MHz
 Ac
ount
ryGS
Mfr
equenc
y
– 1900MHz
Ca s e 2
 Analysis

Maybe the interference comes from A country, but looks
like impossible because the distance (50 to 200Km) is
beyond the transmission

To confirm this problem, use A country cell phone at the
area with high RTWP

The result shows the phone does receive the A country
DSC
Ca s e 2
 Conclusion

The interference comes from A country GSM
 Even the distance is very far, the area between the
border is covered by a large water area

Due to reflection the water, the signal can be transmitted
far away
Ca s e 2
 Conclusion

After known the reason, the following character of this
kind of interference is found
 Rel
atedt
otheweat
her
– Ra in da y, no inte rfe re nce
– Cloudy da y, le s s inte rfe re nce
– S unny da y, high inte rfe re nce
 Rel
atedt
othes
eas
onsal
so
– P roble ms s how a t S umme r more tha n Winte r
Ca s e 2
 Summary

Characteristics of external interference
 The RTWP result are same at the main and diversity antenna
 The amplitude of interference is small, and the difference is less than 10
dB
 The interference exists at large area, not just one cell, also including
neighbor cells
 The direction of external interference is obvious
 The cell with high antenna is easier to be interferenced
S umma ry
 RF optimization

Neighbor cell list optimization

Coverage performance optimization
 Interference optimization
Thank you
www.huawei.com

WCDMA Ra Dio Freque Ncy Optimization

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

WCDMA Ra Dio Freque Ncy Optimization

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

WCDMA Ra dio

Fre que ncy Optimiza tion

Copyright © 2007 Huawei Technologies Co., Ltd. All rights reserved.

The DT result is satisfied N

SHO Percentage 30%-40%

 Typical Problems Analysis in RF optimization

SC 170 is not in monitor set

Search for the latest intra-

The primary scramble

Check the list of intra-frequency

Measurement control (1A Event for PSC 227)

Radio Link Setup

Radio Link Setup Response

Active set update

Active set update complete

Radio Link Failure

14602 (Frequency B) 14031 (Frequency B)

Inter-frequency handover based on capacity

Inter-RAT handover based on coverage

Cell 14031 with

Cell 14605 CPICH

14602 (Frequency B) 14031 (Frequency B)

Inter-frequency handover based on capacity

Inter-RAT handover based on coverage

environment, the signal

increase the antenna height or

cover this area

 Consider the missing neighbor cell

RNC sent Active Set Update to

cel l 56 vs cel l 041

– Adjust the direction from 0 to 310

 Increase the coverage performance at this area

– Adjust the direction from 300 to 270

 RF case related to interference

201 11912 Aguada_C 2005-11-15 4:00 -93.94 -88.65 -105.66

201 11942 Centenario_C 2005-11-15 4:00 -95.86 -87.65 -105.66

201 11623 Ciudad Vieja_C 2005-11-15 0:00 -96.74 -91 -105.65

201 11643 Pocitos_C 2005-11-15 2:00 -97.72 -92.65 -105.65

You might also like