Professional Documents
Culture Documents
approximately 60,000 student athletes compete for their schools with both the National
an association of small colleges, and the National Junior College Athletic Association (National
Junior College Athletic Association, 2017), an association of two year colleges. With anticipated
Ffall 2017 college and university enrollment figures of 20.4 million students (National Center for Commented [AKS1]: Capitalize seasons when used in this
context
Education Statistics, 2017), the percentage of American college students who participate in
Association (NCAA) in 2016-17, 56.3% were male. 65.4% of student athletes were White,
16.1% were Black, and 5.4% were Hispanic/Latino. Additionally, 3.8% of student athletes were
international students. 14.7% of all athletes played football (all male), 11.8% competed in
outdoor track and field, 10.6% player soccer, and 7.1% played basketball (National Collegiate
Data provided by the NCAA shows that in 2016, 86% of student athletes graduated from
a four year institution with a degree. The sport an athlete plays, their gender, and their
race/ethnicity play a role in the expected graduation rate, with only 76% of football players and
80% of men’s basketball players graduating, while over 96% of women’s gymnastics, lacrosse,
and field hockey players graduated. Black football student athletes had the lowest graduation
2
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
rate, with only 70% reaching graduation, while 77% of Black men’s basketball players obtained
a diploma, compared to 89% of White football players and 95% of female basketball players
(National Collegiate Athletic Association Research Staff, 2016). Other research has found that
the graduation rates at Division 1 institutions is higher for athletes than the average for all
undergraduates, with female athletes being 10% more likely to graduate than other
undergraduates and male athletes being 1% more likely to graduate than the average student
(Rishe, 2003). The same study did findfound that Black athletes were 10% less likely to graduate
than the average student. Some recent outside researchers, however, question the legitimacy of
the NCAA’s numbers, including Turner, Southall, and Eckard (2015) who found that male
football and basketball players had lower graduation rates than the general student body and that
Black student athletes in both sports had far lower academic success rates than their white peers.
The NCAA has also found that 16% of student athletes are first generation students.
Football and wrestling are the sports with the highest prevalence of first generation student
athletes, with 25% and 23% respectively. Minority student athletes are also much more likely to
be first generation students compared to white student athletes, with 26% of minority student
athletes and 12% of White student athletes being first generation students. First generation
student athletes are also less likely to strongly agree that they would attend a four-year institution
than non-first generation students if they had not been a college athlete (National Collegiate
Student athletes who compete in the NCAA may participate at one of three different
classifications of institution, each of which would greatly influence their experience in college.
Of the 480,000 student athletes who competed in 2015/16, 176,000 participated at the Division 1
level, primarily comprised of large institutions, which provided some level of financial
3
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
scholarship tied to athletic participation to 56% of all student athletes; 119,000 participated at the
Division 2 level, primarily comprised of smaller institutions that provided some level of financial
scholarship tied to athletic participation to 61% of all student athletes; and 188,000 participated
at the Division 3 level, comprised almost exclusively of small liberal arts colleges that by NCAA
policy are not able to provide any financial assistance tied to participating in athletics to students
factor that influences a student’s experience is whether or not they participate in a “revenue
generating” sports, such as football and men’s basketball (Horton, 2009), where a greater
emphasis is put on the institution selling tickets to games and earning lucrative television
A large difference in the student experience of student athletes compared to their peers is
the time demands that being a student athlete entails. Jolly (2008) provides an example of one of
his students having their entire day scheduled out for them from 9 a.m. to 10 p.m., by going from
then to study hall or class. During their season, 82% of Division 1 student athletes report
spending more than 10 hours per week practicing their sport and 40% report spending more than
10 hours per week playing their sport (Potuto & O'Hanlon, 2007). This regimented schedule is
difficult for many student athletes, particularly freshmen, to adjust to (Jolly, 2008).
Student athletes are also required to travel on a consistent basis during the season for
competitions. Only 12% of student athletes reported being able to stay at home for at least 15
consecutive days three or more times in a year (Potuto & O'Hanlon, 2007), meaning that students
have fewer opportunities to meet and engage with other students, faculty members, and
4
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
university staff, and are requireding student athletes to miss classroom time. Potuto and
O’Hanlon (2007) found that over half of the student athletes they surveyed spent less time on
academics than they would have liked and that athletic participation was the primary cause.
NCAA policies require student athletes to remain in good standing with the institution
and to be enrolled in a full time course load (Jolly, 2008). There is immense pressure to maintain
sufficient grades in order to remain academically eligible (add cite). The result is that some
student athletes end up choosing less academically rigorous programs of study (Foster & Huml,
2017), although very few regret the decision to put athletics ahead of academics (Potuto &
O'Hanlon, 2007). Student athletes who see themselves primarily as athletes and who factor in the
time they will dedicate to athletics when choosing a major are more likely to pick a major that
follows their athletic goals but not their long term career goals (Foster & Huml, 2017). Over two-
thirds of student athletes also reported not being able to take courses they were interested in due
A majority of student athletes see themselves as primarily athletes and less students Commented [AKS2]: “less students” sounds a little bit
wonky -- “primarily as athletes and less as students” might
work better?
(Watt & Moore, 2001; Potuto & O'Hanlon, 2007). One recent study found that 93% of student
athletes believed that they were easily recognizable on campus as an athlete (Parsons, 2013).
This leads to a feeling of isolation between student athletes and the rest of the college culture
(Gaston-Gayles, 2015). The student athletes spend the majority of their time with their
teammates, traveling together, practicing/working out together, studying together, and often
living together, and as such have a network of friends at the ready, which keeps them from
seeking out friends outside of their team (Jolly, 2008). This can also lead to student athletes who
have classes together self-segregating themselves from other students and failing to establish
5
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
Student athletes must also deal with stereotypes and prejudices against them as student
athletes, primarily the “‘dumb jock”’ stereotype, from fellow students and faculty members
(Parsons, 2013). Studies have shown that some faculty members are unwilling to assist student
athletes in rescheduling tests or assignments when travel for competition creates a conflict for the
student (Parsons, 2013). Parsons’ (2013) study at a Division 2 institution also found that two
negative remarks some student athletes heard from faculty members were “athletes are only
interested in sports” and “athletes expect special treatment they don’t deserve”.(p. #).
Support Structures
The motivations of student athletes to participate in both athletics and academics is are
different for each individual. Gaston-Gayles (2015) suggests that an important step to for campus
help increase the student athlete’s academic motivations if necessary. An assessment would also
allow student affairs professionals on campus to better understand the individual student athletes
and understand how tensions between athletics and academics will might affect that student
(Watt & Moore, 2001). Better education of on these tensions and the other challenges that
student athletes face can help faculty and staff members understand the unique barriers these
students face and improve their service to this population (Watt & Moore, 2001; Jolly, 2008) and
remove some of the stereotypes and prejudices that student athletes face. This includes
increasing student athlete-faculty interactions both inside and outside the classroom (Jolly, 2008;
Gaston-Gayles, 2015).
Interacting with non-athlete peer students is also an important step to limiting the
isolation affect that student athletes face. Finding ways for student athletes to interact with other
6
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
student organizations through events and service activities can help get student athletes outside
of the bubble of their teammates (Gaston-Gayles, 2015). Gaston-Gayles (2015) also recommends
thate student athletes live on campus in buildings that are primarily comprised of non-athletes,
allowing them more opportunities to interact and build relationships with peers, faculty, and
staff.
Research into academic performance of student athletes also suggests that better
understanding by athletic departments and academic advisors of the factors that influence student
athletes’ course selection processes and motivations for choosing majors can assist in guiding
students towards their intended career choices and taking pursuing majors that align with the
long term goals (Foster & Huml, 2017). Understanding student athletes’ schedules and offering
advising sessions in the evenings and on weekends can also assist this population (Watt &
Moore, 2001). Bimper (2017) also suggests that increased mentoring programs for Bblack
student athletes will assist in improving their educational attainment by black student athletes.
This matches with Watt & Moore’s (2001) recommendation of creatingto create a network of
successful student athlete graduates to serve as mentors for current student athletes.
Conclusion
Student athletes are a small percentage of the total higher education student body who are
typically very visible as ambassadors of the institution. The time commitments demanded of
these students for practices, games, and travel make them a unique population who need
additional support to succeed. Many student athletes do see academic success, which is
necessary since only 2% of NCAA student athletes continue on to play sports professionally
7
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
Campus administrators can help this student population succeed by finding ways to
increase interactions between student athletes and their faculty, staff, and peers to combat the
sense of isolation many student athletes experience on campus. Educating faculty members about
the demands that student athletes face can also help combat stereotypes that exist about student
athletes and encourage these students to seek out more rigorous academic majors. Lastly,
mentorship programs for student athletes of all genders, races, and ethnicities can assist in
increasing graduation rates for all student athletes, particularly Bblack males.
This small group of students are typically the most visible face of many large institutions.
The fFaculty, staff, and fellow students should find ways to ensure that the face of the institution
23.8/24
8
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
9
THE STUDENT ATHLETE EXPERIENCE
National Junior College Athletic Association. (2017). NJCAA Participation Figures. Retrieved
from
http://static.psbin.com/1/f/foxubphijs5cjm/NJCAA_SA_Participation_Stats_8.1.17.pdf
Parsons, J. (2013). Student Athlete Perceptions of Academic Success and Athlete Stereotypes on
Campus. Journal of Sport Behavior, 36(4), 400-416.
Potuto, J. R., & O'Hanlon, J. (2007). National Study of Student-Athletes Regarding Their
Experiences As College Students. College Student Journal, 41(4), 947-966.
Rishe, P. J. (2003). A Reexamination of How Athletic Success Impacts Graduation Rates:
Comparing Student-Athletes to All Other Undergraduates. American Journal of
Economics and Sociology, 62(2), 407-427.
Turner, R. W., Southall, R. M., & Eckard, W. (2015). Athlete Graduation Rate Gaps at Division-
I State Flagship Universities: An Exploratory Analysis Emphasizing Black Males.
Spectrum: A Journal on Black Men, 3(2), 1-25.
Watt, S. K., & Moore, J. L. (2001). Who Are Student Athletes? In M. F. Howard-Hamilton, & S.
K. Watt, Student Services for Athletes: New Directions for Student Services (pp. 7-18).
San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
10