Professional Documents
Culture Documents
being traditional undergraduate students pursuing a bachelor’s degree. 33%, or 1,034 of our
undergraduate students are males. 44% of our student population are visible minorities
(Stevenson University, n.d.). As you know, in the varsity sports that your department oversees,
we have 370 male student athletes, of which 143 are members of our football team (Stevenson
University Athletics, 2015). Those numbers indicate that 36% of our male undergraduate Commented [AKS1]: Wow
students are athletes and that 14% of our male student population is part of the football program.
This is significantly higher than the national average of just 2.9% of students being athletes
(National Center for Education Statistics, 2017) and is part of our effort to attract more male
Nationally, the six year graduation rate for student athletes from four year institutions like
Stevenson is 86% (National Collegiate Athletic Association Research Staff, 2016), while ours is
currently 41% for male athletes (Stevenson University, 2016). This puts male athletes’
graduation rate 17% lower than male non-athletes here at Stevenson and male athletes at other
Middle Atlantic Conference peer institutions, good forwhich places us last place among the 17
institutions. The six year graduation rate for football players nationally is lower, at 76%, with
only 70% of Black football players graduating (National Collegiate Athletic Association
Research Staff, 2016). Our football players are graduating at a rate of 27%, a full 31% lower than
male non-athletes (Stevenson University, 2016). During the same time period, 76% of our female
This low graduation rate, particularly among the football players who represent 39% of
our male student athletes, must be addressed. The development of a mentorship program to help
assist our students succeed both in the classroom and on the field is a proven way to help get our
football players from handling a pigskin to a handling a Stevenson diploma. Commented [AKS2]: Catchy turn of phrase
Recent research has indicated that mentorship programs have significant results in
assisting minority students achieve academic success. Bimper (2017) looked at Black student
athletes at primarily White institutions and found that having a mentor helped the student athlete
navigate the institution, developing their social capital and self-advocateing for themselves.
Carter and Hart (2010) found that having mentors from a similar gender and race, and who
is/waswere also an athletes, helped students develop. Bimper (2017) agreeds, saying arguing that
sport, race, and gender all play a role in a student athletes’ willingness to be mentored. Howard-
Hamilton and Sina (2001) see a mentoring relationship as one that can “provide health and
emotional support that focuses on developing a healthy self-image.” (p. #).. They also believe
that having faculty and administrators mentor a player or a team can help reduce biases that
faculty and staff have towards student athletes and better serve the students. In terms of student
athletes, hHaving a mentor available to them student athletes to help guide them through the
challenges of being both a student and an athlete, can thus be very beneficial to their academic
success.
The mentorship program should therefore have two primary components: peer mentors
and faculty mentors. Peer mentors can be recruited from current student athletes on the team who
are achieving a 3.0 GPA or higher and from football players who recently graduated. This would
allow current players to have a mentor who is of the same gender and of the same status as
football student athlete, fulfilling Bimper’s (2017), Carter and Hart’s (2010), and Watt and
Moore’s (2001) suggestions on the best options for selecting successful mentors. Race should
also play a role when recruiting mentors as we do have a large proportion of racial minorities
who are members of our football team and having a mentor of the same race as them will also
help them succeed (Bimper, 2017). Students should be paired one-to-one or at most two-to-one
with mentors. They should have once per week check-ins with their mentor in person or by
phone to verify that the student athlete is feeling confident in their program of study and to help
Faculty mentors should be selected from our current faculty and matched with groups of
8between eight and -10 football players who are studying towards degrees from each professor’s
faculty major (Howard-Hamilton & Sina, 2001). The matching of student athletes with faculty
members will help break down some barriers between the two groups, allow for the faculty
members to provide guidance to the students, allow the faculty members to learn about the
student athletes’ experiences on campus, and hopefully make both groups open to working
together. The students and faculty members should meet bi-weekly for quick 30 minute sessions.
Challenges to Implementation
I am aware that the faculty has previously been resistant to taking on these additional
responsibilities, but I will take care of procuring a sufficient number of willing volunteer faculty
members from my end by stressing the importance of the success of these student athletes to the
overall enrollment at our institution. Additional challenges will come from recruiting a sufficient
number of qualified peer mentors, given the current graduation rate for the team. If needed, we
can recruit other academically successful male student athletes to serve as mentors. Commented [AKS3]: Good plan – I was going to ask
about this, so I’m glad you addressed this in the memo.
The final challenge will be convincing our current football players to participate in this
program. I would ask that you and Coach Hottle make participation in the mentoring program a
Our institution relies heavily on the tuition fees that this large group of current and future
student athletes contribute to the institution. We need to assist these students to continue towards
graduation in order to help them obtain diplomas, to provide revenue for the institution, and to
make our institution appear attractive to future academically inclined student athletes. This
mentorship program is the first step to helping us help our students’ ‘and the institution’s future.
24/24
References
Carter, A. R., & Hart, A. (2010). Perspectives of mentoring: The Black female student-athlete.
Howard-Hamilton, M. F., & Sina, J. A. (2001). How cCollege aAffects sStudent aAthletes. New
National Center for Education Statistics. (2017). Fast fFacts: Back to sSchool sStatistics.
National Collegiate Athletic Association Research Staff. (2016). Trends in gGraduation sSuccess
http://www.ncaa.org/sites/default/files/2016RES_GSRandFedTrends-
Final_sc_20161114.pdf
Stevenson University. (2016). 2016 Athletic aAcademic rReport. Baltimore, MD: Stevenson
information/documents/2016-academic-report.pdf
Stevenson University Athletics. (2015). Stevenson University 2014-15 eEquity in aAthletics
dData aAnalysis rReport. Owings Mills, MD: Stevenson University. Retrieved from
http://gomustangsports.com/EADA/EADA_Data-2015--2-.pdf
http://www.stevenson.edu/about/index.html
Watt, S. K., & Moore, J. L. (2001). Who aAre sStudent aAthletes? In M. F. Howard-Hamilton,
& S. K. Watt, Student Services for Athletes: New Directions for Student Services (pp. 7-