Professional Documents
Culture Documents
L. Bruschelli
Doctor of Mechanical Engineering,
on Load Distribution for
Viale Madonna 2,
22063 Cantu (Como), Italy Thin-Walled Conical Joints
V. Latorrata This article presents a new analytical method with a numerical solution to calculate load
Doctor of Mechanical Engineering, distribution in threaded connections. Our departure model was that suggested by D. G.
Via Resistenza 22, Sopwith who has proposed the most recent and most tested theory. Our research consists
22072 Cermenate (Como), Italy in the introduction of conicity and, above all, in the development of the influence of
boundary geometry (i.e. the nonthreaded section) on load distribution. Pipe joints are
analyzed in special detail, supplying us with useful finite element method comparative
results. 关S0021-8936共00兲02002-X兴
298 Õ Vol. 67, JUNE 2000 Copyright © 2000 by ASME Transactions of the ASME
b⫽
a
冉 1
2 tan 
⫺tan  * tan2 冊 (2) c f ,nom⫽
␦2
b⫹b * tan  * tan
⫹
a
2b * tan 
␦ 1 ⬵r 冉 1
sin 
⫺1 冊 (3) ⫺
a * tan r
2b
冉 冊
⫺ tan ⫺  cos  .
b 2
(8)
d⫽b⫺ ␦ 1 ⫺ ␦ 2 ⬵b⫺ ␦ 2 ⫺r 冉 1
sin 
⫺1 冊 (4) After having moved the two forces to point O 1 it is possible to
solve the elastic wedge problem in a plain-strain condition in the
L f ⫽AB⫽
a
⫺
a * tan
2 sin  2 cos 
⫺r * tan ⫺ 
2 冉 冊 polar coordinates shown in Fig. 4, binding point X with a hinge
and Y with a roller sloped at a angle to the axis.
The three forces shown in Fig. 4 are f ⫽w, q⫽w tan(⫺),
␦2 m⫽w 关 1⫹tan()tan(⫺)兴*b*c f /2.
⫺ (5) The stresses are 共关4兴兲
cos  ⫹sin  * tan
a
冉 1 tan ␦1
冊 ⫽0
冦
R y ⫽O 1 Y ⫽ ⫹ ⫺ (6) 9共 a 兲
2 sin  cos  cos 
2A 2B 2C
冉 冊
⫽⫺ sin共 2 兲 ⫹ sin共 兲 ⫺ cos共 兲 共 9b 兲
a 1 tan ␦1 2
R x ⫽O 1 X⫽ ⫺ ⫺ . (7)
2 sin  cos  cos  A
⫽ 共 cos共 2 兲 ⫺cos共 2  兲兲 . 共 9c 兲
The factor ␦ I is the one due to the bending, caused by contact 2
forces, of both thread flanks in contact 共Fig. 3兲.
The constants A, B, C are
m
A⫽ , (10a)
sin共 2  兲 ⫺2  cos共 2  兲
f
B⫽ , (10b)
2  ⫺sin共 2  兲
q
C⫽ . (10c)
2  ⫹sin共 2  兲
冦
⫽ ⫺ 共 11a 兲 B 2 ⫽⫺ ⫺2 log共 R x 兲共 C sin  ⫹B cos  兲
1⫺ 2 1⫺ Rx
E 1
1⫺ 2 冉
u⫹
v
⫽ ⫺
冊
1⫺
共 11b 兲 冉
⫹  1⫺
1⫺ 冊
共 C cos  ⫺B sin  兲 ⫺
B
1⫺
cos 
E 1 u
冉
1⫺ 2
v
⫹ ⫺ ⫽2 1⫹
.
1⫺ 冊 冉 冊 共 11c 兲
⫺
C
1⫺
sin 
We obtain the displacements solving the equation system 共11兲:
E 2A sin共 2 兲
u共 , 兲⫽ ⫹2B sin共 兲 log共 兲 2A
1⫺ 2 B 3⫽ 关 sin共 2  兲 cos共  ⫹ 兲 ⫺cos共 2  兲 sin共  ⫹ 兲兴
Ry
冋 册
⫺2C cos共 兲 log共 兲 ⫹C 1 cos共 兲
冉 冊
1
⫺B cos  sin共  ⫹ 兲 ⫹2 log共 R y 兲 ⫹2B sin  cos共 
⫹C 2 sin共 兲 ⫺C 1⫺ sin共 兲 1⫺
冉 冊
1⫺
⫺B 1⫺ 冉
cos共 兲 .冊 (12)
⫹ 兲 log共 R y 兲 ⫺B 1⫺
1⫺
 cos  cos共  ⫹ 兲
冉 冊
1⫺
E A cos共 2 兲 ⫺B 1⫺  sin  sin共  ⫹ 兲
1⫺
2 v共 , 兲 ⫽⫺ ⫹2B cos共 兲
冉 冊
1⫺ 共 1⫺ 兲 1⫺
A ⫺C 1⫺  cos  sin共  ⫹ 兲
⫹2C sin共 兲 ⫹ cos共 2 兲 1⫺
冉 冊
1⫺
⫹2B cos共 兲 log共 兲 ⫹2C sin共 兲 log共 兲 ⫹C 1⫺  sin  cos共  ⫹ 兲 ⫹2C log共 R y 兲
1⫺
A cos共 2  兲 C
⫹C 3 ⫹ ⫺C 1 sin共 兲 ⫹C 2 cos共 兲 ⫻cos  cos共  ⫹ 兲 ⫹  sin  sin共  ⫹ 兲
共 1⫺ 兲 1⫺
⫹C 1⫺ 冉
1⫺ 冊
共 sin共 兲 ⫺ cos 兲
⫹2C log共 R y 兲  sin  sin共  ⫹ 兲 .
⫹B 1⫺ 冉
1⫺ 冊
共 cos共 兲 ⫹ sin 兲 . (13) The system 共15兲 can be solved numerically.
We evaluate the displacements 共especially v 兲 at the point where
The three unknown constants C 1 ,C 2 ,C 3 can be obtained by the mutual forces act, having ¯ ⫽b/2 cos c f ,
¯ ⫽; so we express
introducing the boundary conditions
u 共 ⫽R x , ⫽  兲 ⫽0 共 14a 兲
冦
⫺2 v共 ¯ ,
¯兲
v共 ⫽R x , ⫽  兲 ⫽0 共 14b 兲 ␦ I ⫽2 ␦ I,1tooth⫽ . (16)
cos 
u 共 ⫽R y , ⫽⫺  兲 * cos共  ⫹ 兲
⫹ v共 ⫽R y , ⫽⫺  兲 * sin共  ⫹ 兲 ⫽0. 共 14c 兲
We can introduce factor h 共axial recession compliance factor兲:
By developing the boundary condition expressions 共14兲 we ob-
tain a linear equation system in the unknown C 1 ,C 2 ,C 3 :
冋 A 11
A 21
A 31
A 12
A 22
A 32
A 13
A 23
A 33
册再 冎 再 冎
C1 B1
C2 ⫽ B2 ,
C3 B3
(15)
␦ I⫽
2h
E
w (17)
the coefficients So
A 11⫽cos  , A 12⫽sin  , A 13⫽0,
A 21⫽⫺sin  , A 22⫽cos  , A 23⫽R x , ⫺ v共 ¯ ,
¯兲
h⫽E . (18)
A 31⫽cos  cos共  ⫹ 兲 ⫹sin  sin共  ⫹ 兲 , w cos 
冉 冊
kinematic model.
The extension in the case of the half-thickness conical surface
⫹  1⫺ 共 C sin  ⫹B cos  兲
1⫺ is obtained by modifying the equilibrium equations keeping the
再 s x ⫽u 共 x 兲 ⫺z 共 x 兲
s r ⫽y 共 x 兲
s ⫽0
. (19)
Strains are
¦
ds r
r⫽ ⫽0
dr
s r ds y 共 x 兲
⫽ ⫹ ⫽
r rdr R 共 x 兲
(20)
ds x ds
␥ x⫽ ⫹ ⫽0
rd dx
ds r ds s
␥ r⫽ ⫹ ⫺ ⫽0
Fig. 6 Shell displacements and load conventions rd dr r
ds x ds r dy 共 x 兲
␥ rx ⫽ ⫹ ⫽ ⫺共 x 兲
dr dx dx
kinematic model unchanged. The criteria used are shown in Fig. 5
and Fig. 6. and stresses are
zd 共 x 兲 E y共x兲
冦
E E du 共 x 兲 E
x⫽ 共 x⫹ ⫹ r 兲⫽ ⫺ ⫹
共 1⫺ 2 兲 共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx 共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx 共 1⫺ 2 兲 R 共 x 兲
E E y共x兲 E du 共 x 兲 E zd 共 x 兲
⫽ 共 ⫹ x⫹ r 兲⫽ ⫹ ⫺ (21)
共 1⫺ 2 兲 共 1⫺ 2 兲 R 共 x 兲 共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx 共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx
rx ⫽G ␥ rx ⫽G 冉 dy 共 x 兲
dx
⫺共 x 兲 冊
Integrating the stresses we obtain the internal forces per unit tesimal quantities and simplifying the expressions we obtain
length; we introduce the equivalent thickness h * (x)⫽5/6h(x) so
冦
dN x dR
as not to overlook the variation of xr on the same thickness ⫽⫺
共Timoshenko 关7兴 and Corradi Dell’acqua 关8兴兲. dx dx
The internal forces are dT xr T xr dR N
⫹ ⫽ ⫺p (24)
Eh 共 x 兲 d 共 x 兲
3
Eh 共 x 兲 d 共 x 兲
3
dx R dx R
M x⫽ , M ⫽
12共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx 12共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx M x dR dM x dR
⫹ ⫺N x ⫽m⫺T xr .
Eh 共 x 兲 du 共 x 兲 Eh 共 x 兲 y 共 x 兲 R dx dx dx
N x⫽ ⫹ ,
共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx 共 1⫺ 2 兲 R 共 x 兲 Substituting in the last two Eqs. 共24兲 the expressions 共22兲, 共23兲
we get the following equation system:
Eh 共 x 兲 du 共 x 兲 Eh 共 x 兲 y 共 x 兲
N ⫽ ⫹ (22)
共 1⫺ 2 兲 dx 共 1⫺ 2 兲 R 共 x 兲
T xr ⫽Gh * 共 x 兲 冉 dy 共 x 兲
dx
⫺共 x 兲 . 冊
The following links can be observed:
M ⫽ M x
Eh 共 x 兲
N ⫽ y 共 x 兲⫹Nx . (23)
R共 x 兲
We write the equilibrium equations including the conicity effect
of the half thickness surface 共Fig. 7兲; ignoring the superior infini- Fig. 7 Internal and applied loads
D 1共 x 兲
冉 d2y共 x 兲 d共 x 兲
dx 2
d 2共 x 兲
dx 2
⫹
⫺
dx
冉
⫹
D 1共 x 兲 R ⬘共 x 兲
R共 x 兲
冊冉
D 2共 x 兲 R ⬘共 x 兲
R共 x 兲
⫹D ⬘1 共 x 兲
⫹D ⬘2 共 x 兲
dx 冊
d共 x 兲
⫹D 2 共 x 兲
冊冉
dy 共 x 兲
dx
dy 共 x 兲
dx
冉
冊
⫺ 共 x 兲 ⫺D 3 共 x 兲 y 共 x 兲 ⫽⫺p 共 x 兲 ⫹
冊
⫺ 共 x 兲 ⫽m 共 x 兲 ⫹N x 共 x 兲 R ⬘ 共 x 兲
N x共 x 兲
R共 x 兲
(25)
Eh 3 共 x 兲 Eh 共 x 兲 dR 共 x 兲
D 1共 x 兲 ⫽ , D 2 共 x 兲 ⫽Gh * 共 x 兲 , D 3共 x 兲 ⫽ , R ⬘共 x 兲 ⫽ .
12共 1⫺ 2 兲 R 2共 x 兲 dx
The boundary conditions are the following: mind the axial load expressions P n ⫽⫺( P⫺ 兰 s0 wds) and P b ⫽ P
D 1 共 x⫽0 兲
d
dx
冏 x⫽0
⫽M x,in
⫺ 兰 s0 wds for nut and bolt, we maintain the equation already pro-
posed by Sopwith:
D 2 共 x⫽0 兲 冉 冏
dy
dx x⫽0
冊
⫺ 共 x⫽0 兲 ⫽T xr,in
d ␦ III ⫽ 冉
dx P n P b
⫺
E An Ab
⫽
dx
E 冊 再冕 冋 s
wds
1
⫹
1
Ab An
⫺P册 冋
1
⫹
1
Ab An 册冎 .
冏
0
d
D 1 共 x⫽L 兲 ⫽M x, f in (28)
dx x⫽L
D 2 , 共 x⫽L 兲 冉 冏
dy
dx x⫽L
冊
⫺ 共 x⫽L 兲 ⫽T xr, f in . (26) Differential Equation System
The congruence equation is d ␦ III ⫽d( ␦ II ⫹ ␦ I ); substituting the
Factor ␦ II explicit expressions 共17兲, 共27兲, 共28兲 we obtain
We consider the nut and bolt as two smooth conical shells,
冉 冊 冕 冉 冊
touching along the surface defined by the points of contact on the s
thread. 1 1 dx dw dy n dy b dx
⫺ ⫹ wds⫹2h ⫹Etan ⫺
If we ignore the radial displacement variation between the half- A b A n ds 0 ds dx dx ds
冉 冊
thickness surface and the interface we can express
dx 1 1
␦ II ⫽ 共 y n 共 s 兲 ⫺y b 共 s 兲兲 tan  , (27) ⫽⫺ P ⫹ . (29)
ds Ab An
coupling the shell equations to the congruence relation.
The load system of the two shells consists in the axial load
N x,n ⫽( 兰 s0 wds⫺ P)/(2 R n ) and N x,b ⫽( P⫺ 兰 s0 wds)/(2 R b ) and s
The associated boundary condition is 兰 01 wds⫽ P; s 1 is the over-
in the interface pressure 共made axisymmetrical by giving the same
value to all the points on each parallel兲 p⫽w/a tan(⫺). all length of the thread helix.
Since in the shell Eqs. 共25兲 the loads refer to the half-thickness It is necessary to emphasize how the differentiation of the term
surface, it is necessary to move there the axial distributed load w, ␦ II ⫽(y n (x(s))⫺y b (x(s)))tan  takes place by means of compos-
acting on the interface at a distance of D f il /2 from the axis, thus ite derivatives, in such a way as to obtain the derivatives of y n and
introducing the distributed moment m n ⫽w/a(R n ⫺D f il /2) and y b as regards the axial coordinate x, the most simple to solve the
m b ⫽w/a(D f il /2⫺R b ) 共Fig. 8兲. shell equations.
In the case of the congruence equation it is easier to use the s
variable, both for the presence of the integral term 兰 s0 wds, and for
the more immediate physical interpretation of w.
Factor ␦ III Thus in the system both variables s and x are found; however,
Factor ␦ III is associated with the relative axial displacement in the system will depend on a single unknown, since we have the
the contact area due to axial strains ⑀ x,n and ⑀ x,b . link 共1兲.
Ignoring the contribution of N , M x and M into ⑀ x,n and Keeping in mind the shell equations, it is possible to express the
⑀ x,b , due to the strengthening effect of the tooth, and keeping in overall differential system of Eqs. 共30兲:
The Boundary M x,n,in and T xr,n,in between nut and shell A, M x,n, f in and T xr,n, f in
In order to calculate the mutual boundary forces, which depend between nut and shell D, M x,b,in and T xr,b,in between bolt and
on the overall structural geometry, it is not possible to formulate a shell C and finally M x,b, f in and T xr,b, f in between bolt and shell D.
general theory; each type of joint is an individual case and re- The interaction between shell A and shell C on the shoulder is
quires a specific solution. characterized by the axial make-up load P 共which loads by com-
We obtain the solution for the pipe joints, assuming that no pression the lower surface of shell A and generates traction on the
radial interference is found between the two elements during section of shell C between the shoulder and the start of the bolt兲
makeup. and tangential load T xr,A,in ⫽ f P/( D med,sp ) due to friction
The geometrical dimensions of the structure and the subdivision (D med,sp is the medium thickness shoulder diameter兲.
into six elements 共nut, bolt, shell A, shell B, shell C and shell D兲 To be exact a mutual contact moment should be present be-
are shown in Fig. 9. tween shell A and shell C 共this is not shown in Fig. 10兲; said
The evaluation of the boundary actions for nut and bolt takes moment cannot be expressed in terms of P, and as such would be
place considering the adjacent parts as shells, in order to evaluate a further unknown source of mathematical complexity. So from
numerically the border coefficients and write the kinematic con-
now on we will ignore it, introducing an approximation which can
gruence solving equations.
be verified numerically.
In Fig. 10 the subdivision of the joint in its substructures and
mutual actions in forcing condition is shown. The annotation used is the following: y T M ,shell, in ( T M ,shell, in )
f in f in
It is possible to recognize the actions already introduced: for the displacement 共rotation兲 coefficients due to shear/moment
on the initial/final part of ‘‘shell’’; y shell, in ( shell, in ) for the ‘‘bor- assumed to be positive, using, in writing the congruence equa-
f in f in
der’’ displacement 共rotation兲 due to shear/moment on the initial/ tions, the plus/minus criteria of the shell theory. The congruence
final part of ‘‘shell.’’ equations at the beginning and the end of the nut and bolt are,
The border coefficients and the ‘‘border’’ displacements are respectively,
再 T xr,n, f in * y T,n, f in ⫹M x,n, f in * y M ,n, f in ⫹y n, f in ⫽⫺T xr,n, f in * y T,B,in ⫹M x,n, f in * y M ,B,in ⫹y B,in
T xr,n, f in * T,n, f in ⫹M x,n, f in * M ,n, f in ⫹ n, f in ⫽T xr,n, f in * T,B,in ⫺M x,n, f in * M ,B,in ⫹ B,in
(32)
The systems 共31兲, 共32兲, 共33兲 and 共34兲 cannot be solved by The detailed functional expressions of the ‘‘border’’ displace-
T xr,b,n , M x,b,in , T xr,b, f in , M x,b, f in , T xr,n,in , M x,n,in , T xr,n, f in , ments for nut and bolt are the following:
and M x, , f in ; in fact, all the ‘‘border’’ displacements of nut and
bolt depend on the unknown w which influences the load systems y n,in ⫽y n,in 共 p,m n ,N x,n ,M x,n, f in ,T xr,n, f in 兲
and is in its turn a function of all mutual actions:
n,in ⫽ n,in 共 p,m n ,N x,n ,M x,n, f in ,T xr,n, f in 兲
w⫽w 共 M x,n,in ,T xr,n,in ,M x,n, f in ,T xr,n, f in ,M x,b,in ,
⫻T xr,b,in ,M x,b, f in ,T xr,b, f in 兲 . y n, f in ⫽y n, f in 共 p,m n ,N x,n ,M x,n,in ,T xr,n,in 兲
The problem is thus implicit and requires an iterative solution. n, f in ⫽ n, f in 共 p,m n ,N x,n ,M x,n,in ,T xr,n,in 兲 (35)
⫺ P⫹ 冕 s
冉 冊
wds
w D f il 0
m n⫽ R n⫺ , N x,n ⫽ ,
a 2 2Rn
冕 s
冉 冊
P⫺ wds
w D f il 0
m b⫽ ⫺R b , N x,b ⫽ .
a 2 2Rb Fig. 11 API NC38 joint Rfl in forcing condition with coefficient
of friction f Ä0 and axial load P Ä543 kN
The shell D ‘‘border’’ displacements are always void in that on
shell D external loads do not act; for shell A, shell B, and shell C
‘‘border’’ displacements are directly obtainable as the external
actions are known functions of load P:
y A, f in ⫽y A, f in 共 N x,A ,T xr,A,in 兲
A, f in ⫽ A, f in 共 N x,A ,T xr,A,in 兲
y B,in ⫽y B,in 共 N x,B 兲
B,in ⫽ B,in 共 N x,B 兲
y C, f in ⫽y C, f in 共 N x,C ,T xr,A,in 兲
C, f in ⫽ C, f in 共 N x,C ,T xr,A,in 兲 (37)
where
⫺P fP
N x,A ⫽ , T xr,A,in ⫽ N x,B ⫽0,
2RA D med,s p
P
N x,C ⫽ where L C ⫺L A ⭐x C ⭐L C ;
2RC
0 where x C ⬍L C ⫺L A . Fig. 12 API NC38 joint radial displacement with coefficient of
friction f Ä0 and axial load P Ä543 kN
The iterative solution used consists in the following steps:
1 Calculate all the border coefficients involved.
2 Calculate the ‘‘border’’ displacements of shell A, shell B and
shell C.
3 Calculate w with all the void nut and bolt border actions:
M x,b,in ,Txr,b,in ,M x,b,fin ,Txr,b,fin ,M x,n,in ,Txr,n,in ,M x,n,fin ,Txr,n,fin
⫽0.
4 Construct the nut and bolt load systems and calculate the
associated ‘‘border’’ displacements.
5 Solve the congruence systems to find the boundary actions.
6 Calculate w with the actions of Step 5.
7 Iterate Steps 4, 5, and 6 until convergence.
The calculation of border coefficients and displacements takes
place solving each shell by a numeric approach based on the finite
differences method; also the overall differential system, due to its
complexity, is treated in the same manner.
Results
The results given are related to pipe joint API NC38 关9兴 for Fig. 13 API NC38 joint maximum Rfl value in forcing condi-
which we have developed a finite element method model. tion, with three friction values
R f l j⫽
100
P 冕 s pitch j⫹1
s pitch j
w 共 s 兲 ds.
and on the minimal resistance area A n (s⫽0).
Therefore, this proposed new approach is a very quick and
efficient tool in the design and optimization process of threaded
The results obtained 共Fig. 11, Fig. 12兲 show an affinity, both in connections, which can significantly reduce the number of nu-
Rfl terms and in displacement terms, between the theoretical and merical analyses required.
finite element method values.
It is interesting to analyze the dependence, shown in Fig. 13,
between the maximum Rfl value and the friction coefficient.
Discussion References
The results shown by this new approach clearly indicate how 关1兴 Goodier, J. N., 1940, ‘‘Distribution of Load in Threads of Screws,’’ Trans.
important the correct reproduction of the threaded joint bending ASME, 62, pp. A10–A16.
behavior is, especially for those with thinner characteristics and 关2兴 Sopwith, D. G., 1948, ‘‘The Distribution of Load in Screw Threads,’’ Inst.
Mech. Eng. Appl. Mech. Proc., 159, pp. 373–383.
complex boundary substructures, such as the pipe joint API NC38
关3兴 Stoeckly, E. E., and Macke, H. J., 1952, ‘‘Effect of Taper on Screw Thread
examined. Load Distribution,’’ Trans. ASME, 74, pp. 103–112.
For this type of joint Sopwith’s theory 共generally accepted for 关4兴 Timoshenko, S. P., and Goodier, J. N., 1982, Theory of Elasticity, 3rd Ed.,
common nuts and bolts兲 is no longer valid as it underestimates by Mc.Graw-Hill, New York.
approximately 40 percent the load absorbed by the first pitch, 关5兴 Mindlin, R. D., 1951, ‘‘Influence of Rotatory Inertia and Shear on Flexural
mainly because of the inexact deformed shape produced by the Motion of Isotropic Elastic Plates,’’ ASME J. Appl. Mech., 18, p. 31.
use of the thick cylinder formulas for the ␦ II factor, which is now 关6兴 Reissner, E., 1985, ‘‘Reflection on the Theory of Elastic Plates,’’ Appl. Mech.
calculated with suitable equations for conical shells. Rev., 38, p. 1451.
关7兴 Timoshenko, S. P., and Woinowsky-Krieger, S., 1959, Theory of Plates and
One of the most valuable characteristics of the theoretical ap-
Shells, McGraw-Hill, New York.
proach is the speed with which the solution is obtained by the 关8兴 Corradi Dell’acqua, L., 1992, ‘‘Meccanica Delle Strutture, Vol. 1—II Com-
variation of the geometric parameters of the structure, which al- portamento dei Mezzi Continui,’’ McGraw-Hill, Milano.
lows us to carry out the joint optimization process, otherwise dif- 关9兴 American Petroleum Institute, 1994, ‘‘Specification for Rotary Drill Stem
ficult by the finite element method. Elements—Specification 7,’’ 38th Ed.—1/4/1994.