A social network is a website that allows people with similar interests to come

together and share information, photos and videos.

People engaged in social networking may be doing so as a personal or a

business endeavor. Those who engage on social network sites as a personal
endeavor interact by using various forms of media to discuss their lives and
interests. The most popular social networks for this type of familiar interaction
include Facebook, Google+ and Twitter. Although these and other social
networks may be used for business purposes -- especially marketing -- social
networks exist specifically for enterprise social networking. Popular enterprise
social network platforms include Socialcast and Yammer. Ideally, employees
who are tasked with participating on social networks are provided with a social
media policy so there is no ambiguity about what management considers to
be acceptable use.

Recent Examples of SOCIAL NETWORK from the Web

 The platform functions as a kind of social network for coders; their contributions
to the site can serve as a stand-in for a traditional resume.
—Louise Matsakis, WIRED, "How Will Microsoft Handle GitHub's Controversial
Code?," 5 June 2018
 The company's probe comes at a time when the social network is dealing with
the fallout of the Cambridge Analytica data scandal.
—James Rogers, Fox News, "Facebook starts investigation after employee
allegedly used 'privileged' access to stalk women," 2 May 2018
 The social network restricted developer access to many its APIs in the wake of
its Cambridge Analytica scandal, so the tone might be more concil iatory this
time around.

Definition - What does Social Network mean?

A social network is defined as a chain of individuals and their personal connections.
Expanding one’s connections with other people is a technique that can be used both for
personal or business reasons. Social networking applications make use of the
associations between individuals to further facilitate the creation of new connections
with other people. This could be used to meet new friends and connect with old ones,
as many people do on Facebook, or to expand one’s professional connections through
a business network like LinkedIn.

Separation of Church and State in The

Philippines

 Stand for what you believe in but not at the

expense of others.
 Support the freedom of religion.
 Do not impose your religion on others.
 Give them the choice.
A country that advocates "the separation of church
and state" should never support any religion
financially.
Do you have an opinion regarding the inconsistency
and the violation of the "separaton of church and
state"? click to post.
 It would be a long and tedious process for a leader
who does not want war to fully implement
"separation of church and state".

1. First and foremost would be the

dissemination of information as to why
there is a need for the adherence to the
constitutional provision of the "separation
of church state".
2. Emphasize on (Article III, Section 5) of the
constitution: "No law shall be made
respecting an establishment of religion,"
3. Make it an educational requirement for
schools to explain the need for the
"separation of church and state".
4. Let the religions of the Philippines be aware
that the government will stick to this
resolution.
5. From there congress can take over. With the
help of God.

Contents
[hide]

 1The Philippines violates the Separation of Church and State in its 1987 Constitution
 2Bangsamoro (Moroland) (Moronation): Bangsa: A Malaysian word meaning Nation
 3The Philippine Government claims that The Philippines has the Freedom of Religion and the Separation
of Church and State
o 3.1Inequality in how The Philippine government looks at Religion
 4Why does The Philippine government financially support ISLAM (the Muslims) and not the other
religions?
o 4.1The Philippine government should support Ethnic and indigenous tribes but not a RELIGION
o 4.2Muslims: not an Ethnic group or race, Muslims are those who practice the religion of Islam
o 4.3Separation of religion and state is not an option for Muslims
 5Will The Philippines be a more prosperous Country if it is an ISLAMIC country?
 6What to do to Make the Philippine government follow the "Separation of Church and State"
o 6.1Complacency and indifference on the part of other religious leaders fueled Bangsamoro
 7The Preamble of the 1987 Constitution of The Philippines
 8Disclaimer
 9Links

The Philippines violates the Separation of Church and State in its

1987 Constitution
The Philippines violates the Separation of Church and State in its 1987 Constitution1.

1. The Philippines violates the preamble of the constitution: "We, the sovereign Filipino
people, imploring the aid of Almighty God, in order to build a just and humane
society, and establish a Government that shall embody our ideals and aspirations,
promote the common good, conserve and develop our patrimony, and secure to
ourselves and our posterity, the blessings of independence and democracy under the
rule of law and a regime of truth, justice, freedom, love, equality, and peace, do ordain
and promulgate this Constitution."
 it violates the principle of equality by putting the religion of Islam above other religions.
2. (Article II, Section 6): The separation of Church and State shall be inviolable.
1. The government of the Philippines must never violate the "separation of church and
state".
3. (Article III, Section 5): No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or
prohibiting the free exercise thereof. The free exercise and enjoyment of religious
profession and worship, without discrimination or preference, shall forever be
allowed. No religious test shall be required for the exercise of civil or political rights.
0. "No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion": This means that
laws must never be created to favor, uphold, honor, or respect any religion.
 The Philippines violated this section by creating Republic Act No.
6734 ARMM (Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao). This region is reserved
specifically for Muslims(Moros) the followers of the religion of Islam. The
republic act 6734 "RESPECTS" the religion of Islam.
1. "or prohibiting the free exercise thereof.": We have the freedom of religion. the
government must respect that.
4. Article 6, section 29 (2): states "No public money or property shall be appropriated,
applied, paid, or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of
any sect, church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion.."
0. No law must be created that would finance a religion or financially benefit only the
specific followers of certain religions. i.e. Must not financially benefit Christians,
Muslims or any followers of any religion.
 The government of the Philippines created Republic Act No.9997, the NCMF. A
commission with a yearly governmental budget of over 500 million pesos to
 serve only Muslims. Public money and property has been and is appropriated
for the Muslims(Moros), the followers of the religion of Islam.
The Philippine government violates all 4 points. The Philippine government financially supports the
religion of Islam via the NCMF, the ARMMand now the Bangsamoro.
The teaching of religious classes in public schools is permitted with the written consent of the parent
so long as provided there is no cost to the government. Religious organizations register with the
Securities and Exchange Commission to apply for tax exemption. Registered religions and non-profit
organizations are tax exempt but only with the concurrence of a majority of all the Members of the
Congress.
Note: The developer of this site (Frank Maletsky), is appealing to all of academia, political
leaders, and other religious leaders to say something about this. Whether you are for this
violation or against it. Say something. Why does the Philippines favor one religion (ISLAM)
over the rest?

Bangsamoro (Moroland) (Moronation): Bangsa: A Malaysian

word meaning Nation
As defined by Wikipedia: "The Moro people or Bangsamoro are a population of indigenous
Muslims in the Philippines, forming the largest non-Catholic group in the country, and comprising
about 5% of the total Philippine population." This definition contradicts itself. Wikipedia defines
bangsamoro as a "religious group" by calling them non-Catholics.
Muslims are not indigenous people. Muslims belong to the religion of Islam. Muslims are
comprised of different cultures, races, and different ethnicities all over the world. It is unfortunate
that most of the Philippine academia, leaders, politicians and lawyers follow the same incorrect
definition of wikipedia.
The Philippine government financially supports only one religion and that is the religion of
(Islam). Those who practice the religion of Islam are called Muslims. The Bangsamoro is run by
Muslims.
We will not go article by article or section by section of what the BBL is about. You may peruse
over the basic law yourself. Here is the link to the Draft for a law to create the Bangsamoro - 122
pages.
If the BBL is passed it will replace the existing ARMM. The Bangsamoro is a bigger blanket that
covers more space and also requires more governmental budget.
This budget is what the Filipino people should be concerned about. The Moro people or
Bangsamoro want to be defined as "indigenous Muslims in the Philippines". The Philippine
government goes along with this and therefore classifying Muslims in the Philippines as
an ethnicity. But there is an intrinsic problem with this definition. It violates the 1987 constitution
of the Philippines. Hey, being Muslim does NOT make the person indigenous, being Muslim
makes that person a follower of Islam or one who practices the religion of Islam but in no way
does it automatically make him/her indigenous. Muslims are not indigenous people

n 1987 the constitution of The Philippines created the Separation of Church and State

 As far as the "Freedom of Religion" unquestionably the Philippines protects that.

 As far as the law of the Separation of Church and State, and whether the Philippines is actually
following that law in the constitution, is up for debate.
 Article VI, Section 29, part (2) states: "No public money or property shall be appropriated,
applied, paid, or employed, directly or indirectly, for the use, benefit, or support of any sect,
church, denomination, sectarian institution, or system of religion, or of any priest, preacher,
minister, other religious teacher, or dignitary as such, except when such priest, preacher,
minister, or dignitary is assigned to the armed forces, or to any penal institution, or government
orphanage or leprosarium."
 The 3 items below, don't they violate the constitution's Article VI, Section 29, part (2)?

1. In 1987 Executive Order No. 122-A, created the Office of Muslim Affairs (OMA). This office
served only the Muslim people and not the non-muslims. This office answered only to the
President of the Philippines.
2. In August 1, 1989 just two years later, The Philippines through Republic Act No. 6734
otherwise known as the Organic Act created the Autonomous Region in Muslim Mindanao or
ARMM. Non-Muslims are not allowed to participate in the ARMM government. Then referred
to Mindanao as Muslim Mindanao
3. In 2010 the "National Commission on Muslim Filipinos" replaced the "Office of Muslim
Affairs". This office still falls under the same umbrella and that is, it reports only to the
President of the Philippines.
 Non-Muslims can't participate in this commission. Non-Muslims can't benefit from this
commission and this commission will not serve non-muslims. This commission is funded
by the government and answers only to the President of the Philippines.

 Every year the Philippine government provides a budget (billions of pesos) for both the ARMM
and the NCMF. Both of these entities are Muslim Entities. Both religious entities under the
religion of Islam (Muslim).
 So what does this do to Article 2 section 6 which states: The separation of Church and State
shall be inviolable.?
Inequality in how The Philippine government looks at Religion
 The Philippines claims separation of church and state. Meaning not one centavo will go to the
support of any religion from the tax payers money or no law will be created respecting an
establishment of religion. Yet the Philippines administration and legislature turns around and
violates the constitution for the sake of ISLAM.

1. There is the NCMF (National Commision on Muslim Filipinos) financed by the government.
The Muslims belong to the religion of Islam.
 The government has no existing program to support Iglesia ni Cristo, Aglipayans,
Seventh day Adventists, Catholics or any other religion because the government says
that it is against the constitution and that it violates the "separation of church and state".
But it is OK to financially support the Muslims.
 The government has the National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) for the
support of all the indigenous people of the Philippines. Doesn't it bother the government
officials that a religion is getting more money than the indigenous people?
 National Commission on Indigenous Peoples (NCIP) has P35.46 million as of 2016.
 The National Commission on Muslim Filipinos has P469.67 million in 2016.
2. Polygamy in the Philippines was illegal for all citizens. But on February 4, 1977, The
Philippines created Presidential Decree 1083 to legalize POLYGAMY for Muslims only.
There you have it. Polygamy is illegal for non-muslims but legal for Muslims.
he 1987 Constitution of the Philippines declares: The separation of
Church and State shall be inviolable. (Article II, Section 6), and, No law
shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting
the free exercise thereof.
ARTICLE III, SECTION 5 – FREEDOM OF
RELIGION
Marso 1, 2007 · by foobarph · in Constitutional Law. ·

Freedom of Religion

The right of a man to worship God in his own view is guaranteed by the Bill of Rights under Article III, Section 5 of the 1987
Constitution of the Philippines which states that:
“No law shall be made respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof. The free exervise and enjoyment of religious profession and whoship, without
discrimniation or preference, shall forever be allowed. No religious test shall be requires for the
exercise of civil or political rights.”
Restriction by any law in exercising this right is prohibited by the Constitution itself.

Meaning of religion
According to Concise Oxford Dictionary, religion is the belief in and worship of a superhuman controlling power, especially a
personal God or gods. a particular system of faith and worship. a pursuit or interest followed with devotion.
Aspects of religions freedom

1. The separation of Church and State

2. The freedom of religious profession and worship

 1. Freedom to believe in a religion

2. Freedom to act in accordance with such belief

To believe and Act
Thus the (First) amendment embraces two concepts – freedom to believe and freedom to act. The first is absolute, but in the
nature of things, the second cannot be… In the case at bar, petitioners are not denied or restrained of their freedom of belief or
choice of their religion, but only in the manner by which they had attempted to translate the same to action. But between the
freedom of belief and the exercise of said belief, there is quite a stretch of road to travel. If the exercise of said religious belief
clashes with the established institutions of society and with the law, then the former must yield and give way to the latter. The
government steps in and either restrains said exercise or even prosecutes the one exercising it.

ARTICLE IX

ARTICLE IX

Constitutional Commissions

A. COMMON PROVISIONS

Section 1. The Constitutional Commissions, which shall be independent, are the Civil Service
Commission, the Commission on Elections, and the Commission on Audit.

Section 2. No member of a Constitutional Commission shall, during his tenure, hold any other
office or employment. Neither shall he engage in the practice of any profession or in the active
management or control of any business which, in any way, may be affected by the functions of
his office, nor shall he be financially interested, directly or indirectly, in any contract with, or in
any franchise or privilege granted by the Government, any of its subdivisions, agencies, or
instrumentalities, including government-owned or controlled corporations or their subsidiaries.