Anterior Compartment Prolapse:

Biological Grafts
Miss Michelle Fynes MB BAO BCH (Hons) MRCOG DU DipUs MD (Research)
Consultant Subspecialist Urogynaecologist
Department of Reconstructive Pelvic Surgery
& Urogynaecology
St George’s Hospital and
Honorary Senior Lecturer St. Georges University of London

Presented to: RCOG Urogynaecology Surgical Masterclass 2012

 Introduction
 Assessment and management of anterior
vaginal wall defects presents a unique
surgical challenge

 It is the most common site of initial

prolapse in women and the most common
site of recurrence
 Background
 POP surgery undertaken in 11% of women
 Surgical POP rates will increase with aging
population
 Anterior vaginal wall is both the most common
site of POP (81% of surgical repairs)
 Cystocele repair fails most frequently (up to
41%) Olsen AL. Obstet Gynecol. 1997;89:501–506.
Jelovsek JE. Lancet. 2007;369:1027–1038.
He. USA 2005 special studies 65+ www.census.gov.
Benson JT. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1996;175:1418–1421.
Nguyen JN. Obstet Gynecol. 2008;111:891–898.
Nguyen JK. Obstet Gynecol Surv. 2001;56:239–246.
Maher C. IUJ 2006;17:195–201.
 Cystocele

 Analysis of “Well women” population

 For women who entered the WHI protocol
without cystocele. At some point during the
study the following type of POP was diagnosed:
 1 in 4 Cystocele
 1 in 6 Rectocele
 1 in 100 Uterine prolapse

Hendrix SL, Clark A, Nygaard I, et al.

POP in the Women's Health Initiative: gravity and gravidity.
Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2002;186:1160–1166.
 What’s wrong with anterior
vaginal wall support?
 Is the anterior compartment not as well supported by
the levator plate countering the effects of gravity &
abdominal pressure as for the posterior
compartment?
 Are the attachments of the anterior compartment to
the pelvic sidewall or to the apex weaker?
 Is the anterior wall more elastic or less dense when
compared with the posterior wall?
 Is the anterior wall more susceptible to damage during
childbirth or weakening with aging or loss of
oestrogen?
 George White
(1866-1926)

 On reviewing the failure of

anterior repair:
The reason for failure seems to be that the normal
support of the bladder has not been sought for and
restored, but instead an irrational removal of part
of the anterior vaginal wall has been resorted to,
which could only result in disappointment and
failure.
 Objectives
For successful surgical
intervention in women with
Cystocele we need to
understand:
 The anatomy of anterior vaginal wall support
 Patho-anatomy of Cystocele
 Classification and types of Cystocele
 Institute appropriate surgical repair techniques
 Identify those with high risk of failure based on patho-
anatomy
 Anatomy Anterior
Compartment Support
Trapezoidal support Anterior Vaginal Compartment

Illustration From Article by Brincat et al 2010

Anatomy Anterior Compartment
Support

 Anterior vaginal wall resembles a

trapezoidal plane because of the ventral
and more medial attachments near the
pubic symphysis and dorsal and more
lateral attachments near the ischial spine
 The trapezoidal anterior wall is suspended
both sides to the parietal fascia overlying
the levator ani muscles at the arcus
tendineus fascia pelvis (ATFP)
Cystocele: Midline Defect
 Damage to pubocervical fascia
 Fascia stretches and weakens

 Bladder sinks into the middle of the upper

vaginal wall
Cystocele: Lateral Defect
 Detachment of fascia from arcus tendineus
 Fascia tears away from their attachments to
the sidewalls of the pelvis
Clinical Presentation

FIGURE B. A cephalad defect

FIGURE A. A transverse defect
with loss of apical attachment
with loss of the anterior fornix.
at the level of the ischial spine.
Surgical Intervention -
Midline Defect
 Disappointing results with
“standard” vaginal repair

 Recurrence rates vary with

definition of failure: Weber et al
2001 (56%) & Sand et al
2001(43%)

 Mesh kits: commercial success

but significant concerns
regarding mesh erosion,
dyspareunia and other adverse
events

Anterior Vaginal Wall Fascial Plication

Biological Grafts?
 “Arcus to Arcus” Graft
Level I
Support
Fascial Reconstruction
Restored
Repairing Enterocele

/ /

Suture Placement:
Paravaginal
Central Defect “6-Point Suspension”
Defect Repair
Covered
 Apical
Suspension:
Comparing
Devices

Posterior IVS
Apogee

Prolift

Capio
• Cut suture in 2 to get 2 throws
• Remember needle tip
Placement of Capio Sutures
Xenform™ Tissue Repair Matrix

Fetal Bovine Dermis

 Biological Grafts and Cystocele Repair

Advantages Disadvantages

 Avoid erosion  Cost

 Minimise wound healing
issues
 Improved sexual function
 Anchoring technique
 Longevity of graft
 Host versus graft
interaction
 Outcome data
 Clinical History
 53 yrs Para 3  Past surgery
 Referred with recurrent Vaginal Hysterectomy &
cystocele in 2009 Pelvic Floor Repair
 Symptoms (1980)
 Vaginal bulge &
Posterior repair &
discomfort worse at sacrospinous fixation
the end of the day (2006)
 Urgency & occasional
 Examination
UI but no SUI Grade 2 cystocele,
 No voiding difficulties Grade 1-2 vault prolapse,
Grade 1 low rectocele
High perineum
 Operative Procedures

 Anterior colporrhaphy incorporating Arcus to Arcus

attachment with Xenoform
 Sacro-spinous ligament pudendal nerve block

 Low rectocele repair with revision of perineum

Arcus Anchored Acellular Dermal Graft Compared to Anterior
Colporrhaphy for Stage II Cystoceles and Beyond

Aim: Compare acellular dermal matrix to standard colporrhaphy for repair cystoceles.
Methods: 102 patients with > Stage II anterior prolapse (Aa or Ba 0) underwent anterior
colporrhaphy with acellular dermal implant attached to arcus, between 10/2003 and
02/2007 were compared to 89 controls who received standard anterior colporrhaphy.
Objective recurrence was defined as > Stage II (Aa or Ba -1).
Results: The dermal graft and colporrhaphy groups were comparable in age, parity, BMI
and concomitant surgeries except hysteropexy and hysterectomy. Regression was
performed for possible confounders. Postoperatively, 14 (19%) recurrences were identified
in the dermal graft group vs. 26 (43%) in the colporrhaphy group (p=0.004). Two patients
underwent reoperations for cystocele recurrence in the study group versus four in the
control group. Time to normal voiding, subjective stress urinary incontinence, EBL and
length of hospital stay did not differ between groups.
Conclusion: Dermal acellular matrix provides benefit over standard colporrhaphy.

S Botros, P Sand, J Beaumont, Y Abramov, JJ Miller, RP Goldberg

IJPFD 2009
Table 1: Concomitant Surgeries

Arcus Graft Controls

(n=102) (n=89) p-value
Hysterectomy 37 (36%) 60 (67%) <0.001
Hysteropexy 33 (32%) 9 (10%) <0.001
Apical suspensions 0.004
McCall’s 6 (6%) 40 (45%)
Uterosacral 26 (25%) 5 (6%)
Iliococcygeous 7 (7%) 6 (7%)
Sacrospinous vault 17 (17%) 16 (19%)
Compartment Repair - Posterior 88 (86%) 79 (89%) 0.61
Compartment Repair - Anterior 102 (100%) 89 (100%) --
Incontinence Operation - TVT 10 (10%) 13 (15%) 0.31
Incontinence Operation - TOT 42 (41%) 34 (38%) 0.68

S Botros, P Sand, J Beaumont, Y Abramov, JJ Miller, RP Goldberg

IJPFD 2009
Table 2: Postoperative Outcomes
Arcus Graft Controls
(n=72) (n=61) p-value

N (%) N (%)
Anterior recurrence (Aa or Ba to -1) 14(19%) 26 (43%) 0.004
Anterior recurrence (Aa or Ba to 0) 7 (10%) 14 (23%) 0.04
Anterior recurrence (Aa or Ba past 0) 3 (4%) 2 (3%) 1.0
Posterior recurrence (Ap or Bp to -1) 9 (13%) 4 (7%) 0.25
Posterior recurrence (Ap or Bp to 0) 4 (6%) 3 (5%) 1.0
Apical recurrence (c or d to -1) 6 (8%) 6 (10%) 0.69
Postoperative UUI1 26 (41%) 11 (22%) 0.04
Postoperative SUI1 14 (22%) 5 (10%) 0.10
Postoperative dyspareunia1 (n=21 missing) 7 (14%) 8 (19%) 0.49

Mean (SD) Mean (SD)

Estimated Blood loss (mls) (n=11 missing) 246 (161) 288 (182) 0.10

Median (range) Median (range)

Length of Hospital stay (days) (n = 3 missing) 1 (0– 11) 1 (1 – 4) 0.24

1n=64 arcus graft and 50 controls with subjective follow-up

S Botros, P Sand, J Beaumont, Y Abramov, JJ Miller, RP Goldberg

IJPFD 2009
 Efficacy and safety of using mesh or grafts in surgery for anterior and/or
posterior vaginal wall prolapse: systematic review and meta-analysis.
Jia X, Glazener C, Mowatt G, MacLennan G, Bain C, Fraser C, Burr J.
Health Services Research Unit, University of Aberdeen

OBJECTIVES: To systematically review the efficacy and safety of mesh/graft for anterior or posterior
vaginal wall prolapse surgery.
SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs), nonrandomised comparative studies,
registries, case series involving at least 50 women, and RCTs published as conference abstracts from 2005
onwards.
ANALYSIS: 3 groups: anterior, posterior, anterior +/- posterior repair (not reported separately).
RESULTS: 49 studies (N=4569) mesh/graft POP repair. Median follow up 13 months (R 1-51) For Anterior
repair, short-term evidence that mesh/graft (any type) significantly reduced objective prolapse recurrence
rates compared with no mesh/graft (relative risk 0.48, 95% CI 0.32-0.72).

GRAFTS PROLAPSE EROSION RATE

RECURRENCE
CONCLUSIONS:
Evidence for most outcomes was too
Non-absorbable synthetic Non-absorbable sparse to provide meaningful
(8.8%, 48/548) (10.2%, 68/666) conclusions.

Rigorous long-term RCTs are required

Absorbable synthetic Absorbable synthetic
to determine the comparative efficacy
of using mesh/graft.
(23.1%, 63/273) (0.7%, 1/147)

Biological graft Biological graft

(17.9%, 186/1041) (6.0%, 35/581).

BJOG 2008
 Conclusions

 Arcus to Arcus and SSF with Acellular

Cadaveric Graft repair for ≥Stage 2
Cystocele versus standard ultra-lateral
anterior vaginal repair is associated with a
56% reduction in cystocele recurrences and
46% reduction in recurrence to hymenal ring
at a mean follow-up of 15 months

 Lack of specific complications and objective

reduction in prolapse requires further
evaluation
 Role of fascial plication with
augmentation using biological graft?