You are on page 1of 4

International Journal of Trend in Scientific

Research and Development (IJTSRD)


International Open Access Journal
ISSN No: 2456 - 6470 | www.ijtsrd.com | Volume - 2 | Issue – 3

A Study on Effects and Cultural Imp


Impacts
acts of Social Networking Sites
Among Students with Special Reference to Coimbatore City
Mrs. B. Janani, Mrs. B. GeethPriya
Assistant Professor
Professor, Department of Management
Rathinam College of Arts & Science (Autonomous), Coimbatore
Coimbatore, India

ABSTRACT
The Social Networking Sites are becoming vital part only way used to connect with other people, to make
for the Students. Social networking sites offers new friends, reawaken old friends
frien and to long lost
students to communicate effectively and also very relatives. The appearance of social networking sites
useful for sharing the information. It allows students (SNSs) makes the process as they are easier to use.
to easily their own pages in online network of The purpose of this study was to examine how social
contacts, also called as ‘friends’. Nowadays media made an impaction students.
comparing to other communication m methods the Objectives of The Study
Social Networking Sites are faster for sharing the
information. This research project work “A Study on  To find the preferablee social network site.
Effects and Cultural Impacts of Social Networking  To find the input of social network sites
Sites among Students with Special Reference to among students.
Coimbatore City”, analysis the Students prefe
preference  To find the preferences of students in social
and attitude towards Social Networking Sites network sites.
especially Face Book, Twitter, LinkedIn and Others.  To identifying social networking usage and
It also focuses on the impact and effects of Social the impact on the social interactions and
Networking Sites in Students. The findings from the social behaviour.
analysis were discussed in detail and suggestions have  To determine how the students use in social
been given. networking in their daily lives.
Limitation of the Study
Keywords: Social Network, Internet, Communicate
 The sample was restricted to 100 only. So the
INTRODUCTION results cannot be generalized.
 Method of data collection was through personal
In the technological world, the internet isthe best interview and questionnaire so bias becomes a
method for individuals and families for sharing the major limitation.
information. Social media networks are the best gift
of the Internet which has created a new fashion on the Review of Literature
internet to communicate word wide faster. The most 1. Williams et al (2008) in “A review of online social
common social media networks used are Facebook, networking profiles by adolescents” position that
Twitter, and What’s App which are creating and Social networking profiles involve individuals
sustaining relationships with others and shares the creating and maintaining
ining personal Internet sites
information on worldwide. allowing authors and other user’s topmost content,
In this “Informational era,” social media sites seem to thus creating a personal network.
be growing in popularity rapidly, especially among
youths. Students mind set made that the Internet is the

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 3 | Mar-Apr


Apr 2018 Page: 1955
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470
2. Lenhart and Madden (2007) -Proved that in the past Finding
five years social networking has gone sky-high from a
It is in inferred that 42% of respondents are male and
low position into an event that engages tens of
58% of respondents are female. It is in inferred that
millions of Internet users. The study proposes that
47% of respondents age group is 16-20 using and
online social networking profiles posted by youths
48% respondents age group is 21-25 using and 5% of
contain friendly, honest, and obvious. The study states
respondents age group is 26-30 using and 0%
that fifty-five percent of teenagers use and create
respondents age group is 31 and above using of the
online social networking profiles. They speak out that
social networking. It is in inferred that 9% of
with more than half of teenage Internet users
respondents are school level used of network and 49%
interacting online, the concept of blogging is a
respondents are UG used of network and 42% of
outstanding research topic investigating what
respondents are PG used of network and 0%
teenagers are blogging about, how they are socially
respondents of others used of network. It is in inferred
interacting, and what potential effects these
that 16% of respondents are strongly agree about
phenomena may have on other dimensions of their
important of networks and 53% of respondents are
lives.
Agree about important of networks and 27% of
3. Boyd (2007) says that gender appears to influence respondents are Neutral about important of networks
participation on social network sites. Younger boys and 3% of respondents are Disagree about important
are more likely to participate than younger girls but of networks and 1% of respondents are strongly
older girls are far more likely to participate than older disagree about important of networks .It is in inferred
boys. Older boys are twice as likely to use the sites to that 80% of respondents parents are aware of SNS and
flirt and slightly most likely to use the sites to meet 20% of respondents are not aware of social networks.
new people than girls of their age. Older girls are far It is in inferred that 30% of respondents are strongly
more likely to use the sites to connect with friends so agree in learning in schools and colleges and 39% of
easy. They see in person than younger people or boys respondents are Agree in learning in schools and
of their age. colleges and 22% of respondents are Neutral in
learning in schools and colleges and 6% of
4. Larsen (2009), based on the empirical data, says
respondents are Disagree in learning in schools and
that both genders seethe acknowledgement they get
colleges and 3% of respondents are strongly disagree
from having their looks commented on, girls are more
in learning in schools and colleges. It is in inferred
preoccupied with what kind of comments they get and
that 34% of respondents are having 10-50 number of
whom they come from. In general, it is very important
contacts and 23% of respondents are having 51-100
that the comments come from friends and people they
number of contacts and 43% of respondents are more
know, rather than strangers.
than 100 numbers of contacts.
5. Lenhart (2009) .the study was conducted for
It is in inferred that 27% of respondents are
American adults. The study reveals that the usage of
developing friends circle and 50% of respondents are
adult Internet users who have profile on an online
sometimes developing friends circle and 23% of
social network site has more importance in the past
respondents are never developing friends circle. It is
four years .The study posses a statistical analysis of
in inferred that 41 of respondents are facing
the usage of various age group of people based on
psychological problems and 59% of respondents are
their personal attributes.
not facing psychological problems. It is in inferred
Research Methodology that 40% of respondents are positively affected by
The data collected from 100 respondents are academics because of SNS and 23% of respondents
interpreted and analysis using various tools in order to are negatively affected and 37% of respondents are
reach meaningful findings, suggestions and having no effect by the SNS
conclusions. Suggestions
Tools for Analysis The social network must create awareness for students
 Percentage analysis, among job portals and social welfare activities. The
 Rank analysis, advertisements in every possible media would
 Chi-square test increase the market share. Most of the respondents
face psychological problems so the SNS should have

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 3 | Mar-Apr 2018 Page: 1956
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470
Security awareness. LinkedIn have to increase the communication methods, the social networking sites
advertisements among the students.SNS have to as often a much quicker and more convenient way to
increase the privacy policy of their networks. interact. But danger and risk are involved in these
sites.
Conclusion
The primary objective of this research is to find the Bibliography
growth and control of social networking sites among  Kotler Philip (1997) “Marketing Management”,
the college students. Previous researches on social Prentice Hall of India, New Delhi.
networking sites and its impact on college students in  Kothari C.R(2003) “Research
worldwide provided abroad secondary source base for Methodology”,.Wishwaprakashan publishers new
this study. Lot of technologies, adoption of the Delhi.
internet especially for its social uses has seen its  Gupta, S.P “ SatisicalMethods”.S. chand& sons,
highest levels of usage among young college students. new Delhi.
The majority college students have had access to the  Indian Journal of Marketing June 2007,
internet and computers for their communication  Business Todays June 2008,
purposes. When Comparing to traditional  http://www.managementparadise.com

Variable Particulars F % Variable Particulars F %

Gender Male 42 42% Preferable Laptop 30 30%


Female 58 58% way for Smartphone 57 57%
accessing
Age 16-20 47 47% I pod/I pad 2 2%
21-25 48 48% Others 11 11%
26-30 5 5% Days used Less than a 18 18%
month
31andabove 0 0% 1-6 month 25 25%
Education School level 9 9% 7 months to a 11 11%
year
UG 49 49% More than a 46 46%
year
PG 42 42%
Others 0 0% Attractive Facebook 45 45%
Usage of Yes 95 95% sites Twitter 4 4%
network No 5 5% Whatsapp 40 40%
Frequency Facebook 50 50% Linkedin 0 0%
used Twitter 7 7% Others 11 11%
network
Whatsapp 40 40% Reason To keep in 72 72%
for using touch with
social friends and
network family
Linkedin 0 0% Solving social 9 9%
problems
Others 3 3% To use the 8 8%
leisure time
Frequently Everyday 45 45% Other reasons 11 11%

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 3 | Mar-Apr 2018 Page: 1957
International Journal of Trend in Scientific Research and Development (IJTSRD) ISSN: 2456-6470
Visited Twice a week 20 20%
Once a week 26 26% Parents Yes 80 80%
Once a month 9 9% aware No 20 20%
Time <2hr 45 45% Importanc Strongly agree 16 16%
Spended 2-4hrs 20 20% e of social Agree 53 53%
networks
5-6hr 26 26% neutral 27 27%
<6hrs 9 9% Disagree 3 3%
Strongly 1 1%
disagree
Networking Strongly agree 30 30% Psycholog Yes 41 41%
education ical
Agree 39 39% No 59 59%
problems
Neutral 22 22% Promotion yes 88 88%
of
Disagree 6 6% No 12 12%
activities
Strongly disagree 3 3% Keeping Yes 88 88%
in contact
Privacy Strongly agree 5 5% No 12 12%
policies in
Agree 51 51% Help in Strongly agree 12 12%
social
communic
networks Neutral 28 28% Agree 48 48%
ating
Disagree 12 12% Neutral 31 31%
Strongly disagree 4 4% Disagree 0 0%
Number of Oct-50 34 34% Strongly 9 9%
contacts disagree
51-100 23 23% Social Positively 40 40%
networks
More than 100 43 43% Negatively 23 23%
affect the
Developing Yes 27 27% academics No effect 37 37%
friends circle
sometimes 50 50%
Never 23 23%

Occupation & Chi – Square P value Significant/Not Hypothesis


Monthly Analysis (Expected significant Accepted/
Expenditure (Calculated Value) Value) Rejected
2.592 16.334 Not Significant Accepted

@ IJTSRD | Available Online @ www.ijtsrd.com | Volume – 2 | Issue – 3 | Mar-Apr 2018 Page: 1958

You might also like