Professional Documents
Culture Documents
PVP2017
July 16-20, 2017, Waikoloa, Hawaii, USA
PVP2017-65993
A HISTORY OF THE TARGET TORQUE VALUES FROM ASME PCC-1 AND FUTURE
DIRECTION
Clay D. Rodery
BP p.l.c
Webster, Texas USA
roderyc@asme.org
ABSTRACT
Since its original issue in 2000, ASME PCC-1 has NOMENCLATURE
provided guidance to the user for establishing target torque Ab = bolt root area, mm2 (in.2)
values for bolted flanged joint assembly. The original tables As = tensile stress areas of the thread, mm2 (in.2) (see
were developed based on a reference bolt stress of 50 ksi (345 Appendix H)
MPa) with guidance provided for making adjustments using D = nominal diameter of the bolt, mm (in.)
other bolt stress values. Despite its attempts to provide clarity, De = effective bearing diameter of the nut face, mm
the industry perception has been that the 50 ksi (345 MPa) (in.)
reference bolt stress is a mandatory requirement, which has = (do + di)/2
never been the intent. This paper reviews the basis of the F = Target bolt tensile load, N (lb)
original Table 1M/Table 1 values provided in PCC-1, and K = nut factor, (dimensionless)
provides a forecast of future improvements utilizing a new L = lead (equal to the pitch of the threads)
concept called a Target Torque Index based on a unit bolt stress, P% = percentage utilization factor for material yield
allowing the user to utilize the guidance in Appendix O of strength (default value typically 50%; i.e., P% =
PCC-1 to define the appropriate bolt stress for their particular 0.5)
situation. Sbsel = selected assembly bolt stress, MPa (psi)
T = Target Torque, Nmm (in.-lb)
INTRODUCTION TI = Target Torque Index based on a unit bolt stress,
The amount of bolt stress to be employed in the Nm/MPa (ft-lbs/ksi)
establishment of Target Torque values has been a source of Tb = assembly bolt torque, Nm (ft-lbs)
disagreement for many years, even since the original d = nominal bolt diameter, mm (in.)
publication of ASME PCC-1 in 2000. One of the most common di = inner bearing diameter of the nut face, mm (in.)
general perceptions of industry has been that the Target Torque dn = mean diameter of the nut (or bolt head) bearing
values are based on achieving a mandatory bolt stress of 50 ksi, face, mm (in.) [this diameter is equal to the simple
or 345 MPa. average of the diameter of the nut washer face and
The historic use of a common single bolt stress across all the nominal bolt size)
flange sizes and ratings (for example, 50 ksi or 345 MPa) can do = outer bearing diameter of the nut face, mm (in.)
result on a gasket stress that does not provide sufficient margin d2 = pitch diameter (or mean thread contact diameter),
to overcome the effects of creep/relaxation, pressure/external mm (in.) (see Fig. 1)
loads, and thermal loading. In addition, use of this bolt stress = d – 0.6495p (for metric threads)
can result in loading bolts past their yield strength, as in the = d – 0.6495/n (for inch series threads)
case of austenitic stainless steels. For this reason, the fn = coefficient of friction between the bolt nut (or bolt
approaches outlined in Appendix O are preferred. head) and the flange (or washer), (dimensionless)
(4)
2 cos
In the original 2000 Edition of PCC-1, the discussion
regarding target prestress was provided in paragraph 12. It For Metric and US Customary Unified thread forms with a
directed the user to individually select the target prestress for standard included angle of 60 degrees, equation (4) can be
each joint, considering each joint that will be affected by the simplified as shown in equation (5):
prestress. For purposes of convenience and illustration, the
target torque associated with a target prestress of 345 MPa (50
ksi) was given in Table 1M (Metric Units) and Table 1 (Inch 0.15915 0.57735 (5)
2
Series Units). The document indicated that this 345 MPa (50
CONCLUSION
The introduction of the Target Torque Index in Appendix O
of PCC-1 is intended to address misconceptions in industry
regarding the use of a common single bolt stress across all
flange sizes and ratings and fully utilize the guidance for the
determination of an appropriate assembly bolt stress with due
consideration for joint integrity. It has been shown that use of
the nut factor and friction factor approaches provide results
consistent with the level of accuracy needed for bolted joint
assembly.
REFERENCES
[1] ASME PCC-12000 (also 2010 and 2013 Editions),
“Guidelines for Pressure Boundary Bolted Flange Joint
Assembly”, American Society of Mechanical Engineers, New
York.
[2] ASME B1.12003 (Reaffirmed 2008), “Unified Inch
Screw Threads (UN and UNR Thread Form)”, American
Society of Mechanical Engineers, New York.
[3] ASME B1.13M2005 (Reaffirmed 2015), “Metric
Screw Threads: M Profile”, American Society of Mechanical
Engineers, New York.
[4] ASME B18.2.22015 (Reaffirmed 2015), “Nuts for
General Applications: Machine Screw Nuts, Hex, Square, Hex
Flange, and Coupling Nuts (Inch Series)”, American Society of
Mechanical Engineers, New York.