chapter 48,
Lateral Collateral
Ligament
Insufficiency
Joaquin Sanchez-Sotelo
INTRODUCTION
The lateral collateral ligament complex is one of the
main structures implicated in the stability of the elbow
joint Insufficiency of the lateral collateral ligament com=
plex is present in many patients with elbow instability
Several basic science and clinical studies have im=
proved our understanding of the contributions of the
[ateral collateral ligament complex to elbow stability, the
etiology of lateral collateral ligament insufficiency,
the value of different clinical andl imaging tests for iden=
tification of this entity, and the outcome of surgical
repait or reconstruction. The term posterolateral rota~
tory instability has been coined to describe the clinical
condition that results from lateral collateral ligament
complex insufficiency
BASIC SCIENCE
Several ligamentous structures may be identified on the
lateral aspect of the elbow joint (see Chapter 2. The
ligamentous fibers connecting the lateral humeral epi=
condyle with the lateral aspect of the ulna seem to be
the most important for elbow stability on the lateral
side. These fibers, commonly referred to as lateral ulnar
collateral ligament attach distally into the tubercle of the
supinator crest (Fig 48-1). More anterior fibers origi-
rnaled at the lateral humeral epicondyle, named by some
as radial collateral figarzent, blend with the fibers of the
annular ligament. Unlike the medial side of the joint
morphologic and histologic studies have not been able
to show distinct ligaments on the lateral side of the joint
consistently?"
Lateral collateral ligament complex insufficiency
allows excessive posterolateral displacement of the
proximal forearm relative to the distal humerus. The
contribution of the lateral collateral ligament complex
to elbow stability has been investigated in several cadav-
ric models, Release of the whole lateral collateral lige~
Chapter 48 Lateral Collateral Ligament Insufficiency 669
ment complex has been required in most experimental
settings to produce a significant increase in varus and
posterolateral displacements #2" Isolated section of
the ulnar insertion of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament
has not been shown to promote dramatic elbow insta
bility im all cadaveric studies” However, reconstruc
tion of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament with a tendon
graft restores varus and posterolateral stability in the
laboratory” The overlying common extensor-supinator
group has also been shown to play ¢ major role in
elbow stability’? There is a complex interplay be-
tween the lateral collateral ligament complex and other
elbow structures, including the coronoid and radial
head"
ETIOLOGY
TRAUMA
‘The lateral collateral ligament complex may be damaged
as a result of trauma to the elbow, resulling in elbow
dislocation, fracture-dislocation, subluxation, or liga
mentous sprain (Box 48-1). McKee et al reported on
the soft tissue injury patterns identified in 10 dislocations
and 52 fracture-dislocations treated surgically. The lateral
collateral ligament complex was disrupted in all cases
proximal avulsion was the most common failure mode,
followed by midsubstance rupture. The common exten
sor-supinator group was injured in 66) of the cases.
‘The anterior bundle of the medial collateral ligament
was injured in approximately 50% of the cases. Less
severe injuries causing dislocation or an elbow sprain
(usually hyperextension or varus stress) may also
damage the lateral collateral ligament complex if they
place substantial strain on the ligament fibers.
‘When injured, the medial collateral ligament seems to
heal without residual clinically significant medial-sided
instability in most patients.” On the contrary, persistent
lateral-sided instability seems to be more frequent, but
the reasons are unclear: It may be related to a decreased
healing potential, as seen in other anatomic locations
such as the lateral side of the knee joint; the constant
tensile gravitational loads imposed on the injured lateral
side with elbow use; or the more common association
with additional injuries such as radial head or coronoid
fractures, Lateral collateral ligament insufficiency should
be suspected in patients with recurrent dislocation, sub=
jective instability, lateral-sided pain, and a history of
elbow trauma
CHRONIC ATTRITION
Chronic attrition secondary to repetitive valgus stress is
a well-known mechanism leading to medial collateral670 Parti Sports and Overuse Injures tothe Elbow
7
| Annular ligament
Radial Accessory
cote] ( & ri = aed
Lateral unar collateral igament
FIGURE 48-1 From a practical perspective, the lateral
collateral ligament complex may be divided into three
main components: the lateral ulnar collateral ligament,
the annular ligament, and the radial collateral ligament.
80x. logy of Lateral Collateral
Ligament Insufficiency
Trauma + Elbow dislocation,
+ Elbow fracture-dislocation
+ Elbow subluxation
+ Elbow sprain
+ Cubitus varns deformity
+ Lateral epicondylitis
+ Chronic crutch users
+ Inadvertent sectioning in surgery
+ Repeated steroid injections
Chronic attrition
latrogenic injury
ligament insufficiency Chronic attrition of the lateral
collateral ligament complex may occur in rate situations
such as Tong-term:eratch-wallers (paraplegics, poliomyeli-
tis). Post-traumatic or congenital eubitus varus dformiy is
recognized as a risk factor for chronic attrition of the
lateral collateral ligament complex and tardy posterolat-
cral rotatory instability'* With varus malalignment,
triceps contraction has been hypothesized to force pos
terolateral rotatory subluxation and eventually lead to
attenuation of the lateral collateral ligament complex. In
addition, one cadaveric study has shown increased
strain on the lateral collateral ligament complex with
more than 25 degrees of varus deformity and lateral
joint line opening with more than 20 degrees of varus
deformity? In this setting, corrective osteotomy should
bee considered as an adjunct to lateral collateral ligament
reconstruction to prevent failure. Insufficiency of the
lateral collateral ligament has also been identified in
patients with tamis dbow and no prior surgery", insuffi-
Giency in this setting may be secondary to ligamentous
involvement by the same pathologic process affecting
the common extensor group* or the detrimental side
effects on collagen fibers of repeated steroid
injections*”*
IATROGENIC INJURY
Inadvertent damage of the lateral collateral ligament
may occur during surgical procedures on the lateral
side of the joint Surgical treatment of tennis elbow may
compromise the lateral collateral ligament complex if
the release or debridement of the common extensor
origin are too extensive, especially when the lateral
epicondyle is denuded off soft tissues. Exposure of the
radial head or capitellum for fracture fixation or chronic
reconstruction may also jeopardize the lateral collateral
ligament complex, especially when Kécher’s interval is
used or the joint needs to be subluxed or dislocated in
order to complete the surgical procedure Special
attention is required when performing surgery on the
lateral side of the elbow joint to avoid damage to
the lateral collateral ligament complex. Formal repair of
the damaged ligament should always be part of the
wound dosure
DIAGNOSIS
PRESENTATION
The clinical expression of lateral collateral ligament
complex insufficiency varies considerably depending on
the etiology, severity, associated pathology, previous
surgery, and activity level (Box 48-2), Some patients may
complain of recurrent episodes of frank elbow disloca-
tion, However, most commonly patients complain of
more subtle symptoms, including lateral-sided elbow
pain, mechanical symptoms (clicking, catching, snap
ping, locking) or subjective instability” Patients with
ligamentous insufficiency after a fracture-dislocation
may present with more severe pain or stillness second
ary to the associated injuries. Commonly, most patients
with lateral collateral ligament complex insulficiency
report @ previous history of trauma or surgery In
patients with previous surgery itis important to deter
mine if the preoperative symptoms were corrected
by the surgery or if on the contrary surgery had
no effect or occasioned a whole new constellation of
symptoms,
Subtle elbow instability is reflected by the inability of
the patient to push with the affected upper extremity to
stand up from a scat” open a heavy door, or similar
activities that require active elbow extension against
resistance with forearm supination. However, instability
episodes are difficult to identify as such by the patient,al Diagnosis of Lateral Collateral
Ligament Complex Insufficiency
History + Lateral-sided elbow pain
+ Mechanical symptoms
+ Subjective instability
+ Recurrent dislocation,
+ Pain over the location of the
lateral collateral ligament
complex
+ Apprehension/pain with varus
stress
+ Positive results on
posterolateral drawer test
+ Positive resulls on
posterolateral pivoteshift test
+ Positive results on chair test
+ Positive resulls on push-up
test
+ Posterolateral subluxation on
plain radiographs
+ Lateral collateral ligament
discontinuity on magnetic
resonance imaging scan
+ Stress radiographs oF
Auoroscopy
+ Lateral join line opening >
+ Posterolateral subluxation
+ Positive results in
posterolateral drawer test
+ Positive results in
pposlerolateral pivot-shift test
+ Fluoroscopieally proven
+ Lateral joint line opening >
2mm
+ Posterolateral subluxation
+ Excessive lateral jointline
‘opening (drive-through)
+ Posterolateral subluxation
+ Lateral capsuloligamentous
diet
Physical examination,
Imaging studies
Examination under
anesthesia
Arthroscopy
who often reports pain when attempting to perform the
above-mentioned activities,
PHYSICAL EXAMINATION
A detailed physical examination should help identify
basic information such as the specific location of the
pain and elbow range of motion (see Chapter 4). The
location of previous skin incisions and the presence of
deformity should be noted. As mentioned earlier, cubitus
varus predisposes to tardy posterolateral rotatory insta~
bility. In addition, lateral skin incisions centered poste-
rior to the midcoronal plane may be associated with
Chapter 48 Lateral Collateral Ligament insufficiency 671
FIGURE 48-2 Posterolateral rotatory drawer test
inadvertent ligamentous damage. The integrity of the
medial and lateral collateral ligament complex should
be tested in all cases. Examination maneuvers for insta
bility may be masked by associated pathology (stiliness
or an absent radial head, for example). In the author's
experience, pure varus stress does not allow reliable
assessment of the competency of the lateral structures.
Several other physical examination maneuvers have
been described to specifically test the lateral collateral
ligament complex
Posterolateral Rotatory Drawer Test
This test demonstrates posterolateral subluxation of the
proximal radius and ulna with forced supination. It is
best performed with the patient laying supine and the
upper extremity overhead to lock the shoulder in inter
nal rotation (Fig 48-2), Forced supination of the forearm
in approximately 45 degrees of flexion will induce
abnormal excessive posterolateral subluxation of the
bow. The test is best demonstrated when forced
supination is combined with valgus torque and axial
compression. In some cases, subluxation may not be
demonstrated but patients show apprehension with the
Posterolateral Rotatory Pivot-Shift Test
This test demonstrates posterolateral subluxation and
relocation of the elbow joint with elbow flexion and
extension while applying a valgus and supination
moment to the forearm, The patient is examined! in the
same position described earlier (Fig, 48-3). Application
of valgus, axial compression, and hypersupination to
the elbow in approximately 20 degrees of flexion induces
posterolateral subluxation seen as prominence of the
radial head and dimpling of the skin between the proxi~
mal radius and ulna. Progressive elbow flexion while
maintaining the valgus, compression, and supination(672 Part Sports and Overase Injuries tothe Elbow
FIGURE 48-3 Posterolateral pivot-shift test
torque is accompanied by a sudden rotatory shift and
unk as the elbow is reduced with flexion Again, the
shift cannot be demonstrated in every patient, but most
report apprehension. In patients with an absent radial
head, the clunk is less pronounced.
Chair and Push-Up Apprehension
‘The chair sign involves having the patient stand up from
chair while pushing with the upper extremities and
keeping the forearms in supination and the arms
abducted to greater than the shoulder width” The test
is considered positive if there is reluctance to extend the
clbow fully as the patient raises his body using exclu=
sively upper extremity force or a dislocation occurs, The
pusicup sign involves having the patient perform an
active floor or wall push-up with the forearms supi-
nated and the arms abducted to greater than the shoulder
Width, The testis considered postive if the patient shows
reluctance to fully extend the elbow or a dislocation
‘occurs. A similar test has been described with the patient
pushing against the top of a table? Patients report appre-
hension when asked to perform a press-up with the
elbow pointing laterally; pain and apprehension occurs
as the elbow reaches approximately 40 degrees of flexion.
Symptoms improve when the testis repeated using the
thumb of the examiner to push over the radial head,
giving support and preventing posterior subluxation.
IMAGING STUDIES
Plain Radiographs
‘Most patients with isolated lateral collateral ligament
complex insufficiency present with notmal plain radio~
graphs. Rarely, severe insufficiency may present with
fixed posterolateral subluxation or dislocation. Recur-
rent episodes of elbow dislocation documented with
radiographs indicate insufficiency of the lateral collateral
ligament complex. Most of the time, radiographs are
helpful to delineate associated pathology, including
post-traumatic changes at the radial head or coronoid,
or varus malalignment of the distal humerus
Stress Radiographs and Fluoroscopy
Radiographic or fluoroscopic imaging of the elbow sub
jected to stress is an invaluable diagnostic tool in patients
with posterolateral rotatory instability, especially when
the patient is under anesthesia. The status of the medial
collateral ligament should be documented first by apply
ing a valgus load to the extended elbow with the forearm
in pronation*; more than 2mm of medial joint lineopening on the anteroposterior view indicates medial
collateral ligament insufficiency. The forearm is then
placed in full supination a
determine the amount of lateral joint line opening, again.
more than a 2-mm of opening usually indicates lateral
collateral ligament insufficiency However, posterolateral
rotatory instability is best demonstrated on the lateral
views (Fig 48-0); with forced supination and valgus,
the radius and ulna are subluxed posteriorly so that the
center of the radial head does no longer align with the
center of the capitellum and there is asymmetry and
widening of the wlnohumeral joint
a varus load is applied to
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
he different components of the lateral col
ment complex may be visualized on magn
imaging” Although insufficiency of this ligament com-
plex is diagnosed in most patients based on the
history. physical examination and stress radiographs or
fluoroscopy, magnetic resonance may confirm the pres~
ence of ¢ torn or altenuated complex. Some studies have
identified selective deficiency of the posterior fibers of|
the complex lateral ulnar collateral ligament® Howe
negative findings on magnetic resonance imaging does
not exclude the diagnosis of posterolateral rotator
instability!” Magnetic resonance imaging may be espe-
cially useful in patients with tennis elbow and coexistent
igamentous insufficiency’
tral liga~
FIGURE 48-4 Lateral radiograph of a patient with
posterolateral rotatory instability demonstrates
posterolateral subluxation of the elbow; the radial head
and neck are no longer aligned with the center of the
capitellum and the ulnohumeral joint line is widened.
(Chapter 48 Lateral Collateral Ligament Insufficiency 673
Examination Under Anesthesia and
Arthroscopy
Positive findings on the posterolateral drawer and shift
tests may be dificult to demonstrate in the office due
to patient apprehension and guarding. The posterolat-
cral rotatory drawer and posterolateral rotatory pivot
shift tests are almost universally positive with the patient
under anesthesia; fluoroscopic assessment of elbow sta~
bility may also be performed under anesthesia. Arthro=
copy may be used when the diagnosis is still not clear
after examination under anesthesia, arthroscopic find
ings may include excessive lateral joint line openin
(sometimes allowing the arthroscope to be drive
boetween the radial head and the capitellum), demonstra
tion of posterolateral ander
nside the joint, and various degrees
of capsuloligamentous deficiency as visualized from
the inside of the joint
subluxation direct
TREATMENT
ACUTE INJURIES
to the lateral collateral ligament complex is found
most elbow fracture-dislocations that are treated sur=
gicaly (Fig, 48:
is recommended. The lateral collateral ligament complex
is usually avulsed from the epicondyle or tom in its
midsubstance” Our preferred technique for surgical
repair of acute injuries involves the use of a heavy
nonabsorbable suture through the substance of the
lateral collateral ligament complex and into the humeral
epicondyle
The suture follows the line of tension of the lateral
nar collateral ligament. One #2 Fiberwire (Arthrex Inc.
Naples, FL) or #5 Ethibond (Ethicon Johnson an
Johnson, New Brunswick, N)) suture is placed on the
anterior half of the capsuloligamentous fibers in a
running locking configuration" from proximal to distal
and then from distal to proximal, turning at the ulnar
supinator crest (see Fig. 48-58) A second suture is placed
in the same fashion on the posterior half of the capsu-
loligamentous fibers. These sutures may be passed
through the overlying common extensor-supinator
fibers to augment the repair, The isometric point of
umeral_attad is then located at the geometric
center of the capitelhum and bone tunnels are created
starting at that point and aiming anteriorly and poste
riorly. The sutures are passed through the tunnels and
tied on the proximal aspect of the lateral epicondyie.
Postoperative management should follow the same
‘general principles described for reconstruction in the
chronic setting
Al. In these circumstances, formal repair674 Parti Sport and Overus Injuries tothe Elbow
FIGURE 48-5 A, Elbow fracture-dislocations usually
present with a'complete avulsion of the lateral collateral
ligament complex olf the lateral humeral epicondyle,
B, Acute injuries are repaired with two heavy
nonabsorbable sutures through the substance of the
lateral collateral ligament complex and the lateral
humeral epicondyle. The sutures follow the lines of
tension of the lateral ulnar collateral ligament. The
sutures ate partially placed through the common
extensor-supinator group fo augment the repair. They
are then passed through bone tunnels at the isometric
point into the humeral epicondyle
CHRONIC INSUFFICIENCY
Symptomatic insulliciency of the lateral collateral liga
ent complex is best addressed surgically by recon
struction using a tendon graft. Ligament repair or
imbrication have been shown to provide inferior results
in the chronic setting”
Surgical Technique
Placement of the skin incision depends on the need to
address associated pathology. The deep exposure is
through the Kocher interval. This interval is best identi-
fied distally and developed proximally. The raphe
between the anconeus and extensor carpi ulnaris ean
usually be felt distally; the fascia is then incised from
distal to proximal, airing to the center of the humeral
epicondyle. The extensor carpi ulnatis and the anconeus
are then elevated off the remaining lateral elbow capsule
and lateral collateral ligament complex with sharp dis-
section. An effort should be made to preserve capsular
flaps, because the tendon graft is best left extra-articular
bby suturing the capsular flaps underneath the graft at
the eni
The tunnels for insertion of the tendon graft into the
ulna and humerus are created next (Fig. 48-6A), One
hole of the ulnar tunnel is centered over the tubercle of
the supinator crest, which can easily be felt by palpation
‘The second hole is placed proximally and posteriorly
leaving a bone bridge wide enough to avoid fracture
(usually between I and 15 cm). A towel clip or angled
curette may be used to clear the tunnel of bone debris.
The site for humeral atiachment of the tendon graft
is selected so that the reconstruction will be isometric
and maintain the same tension throughout the flexion
extension, first humeral hole is centered slightly
proximal and posterior to the point of isometry. Ustally
aint of isometry is located at the geometric ce
of the capitellar articular surface, this is confirmed with
suture placed through the ulnar tunnel and grasped
with a point used to select the point on the surface of
the humeral epicondyle, where the suture will maintain
the same approximate tension with elbow flexion and
extension (see Fig 48-6A). Next, two proximal exit holes
are created on the anterior and posterior aspect of the
lateral humeral column, and the anterior and posterior
humeral tunnels are created (see Fig, 48-68),
Several options exist for tendon graft selection. Pal=
maris longus autograft was used in the first reports of
the technique® Tendon allografis seem to be associated
with the same outcome and eliminate the morbidity and
additional surgical time associated with autograft har
vesting We currently favor the use of plantaris or sem
tendinosus allograft depending on the sizeof the patient
Two #2 Fiberwire can be placed at the ends of the
tendon graft in a running locking configuration to pull
the tendon through the tunnels and assist in graft
altachment.
The graft may be looped through the tunnels in dif-
ferent ways, which seem to be equally effective as long
as they allow adequate tensioning of the reconstruc
tion.” The tendon graft is passed first through the ulnar
tunnel Depending. on the size of the graft as well as
surgeon preferences, the two ends of the tendon graft
can be then docked into the anterior and. posterior
humeral tunnels, tying the sutures over the proximal
aspect of the humeral epicondyle (sce Fig. 48-6). Alter
natively, one end of the tendon graft may be sutured to
the opposite limb at the entrance into the humeral
1 reconstructionPostgtor Proximal
Point of
leomety
Chapter 48 Lateral Collateral Ligament Insufficiency 675
FIGURE 48-6 Reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex using a tendon graft. A, The
ulnar tunnel is started at the tubercle of the supinator crest and directed proximally and posteriorly
A suture placed through the ulnar tunnel may be used to confirm the isometvicity of the point
selected for humeral allachment of the tendon graft. B, Two humeral tunnels connect the point of
isometry with the anterior and posterior aspects of the lateral humeral column. €, The graft is
doubled on itself and passed through the ulnar tunnel. B, The tendon graft ends may be docked into
the isometric humeral tunnels and the sutures tied over the humeral epicondyle,
tunnels creating a yoke-ike structure. The longer limb
is passed though the posterior tunnel, aver the top, and
into the anterior tunnel. Traction is then placed at the
end. of the yoke and the end of the longer limb to
tension the graft Fig, 48-7.
Whenever possible, any remaining capsule should be
sutured to seal the joint before the graft recor
1s completed so that the graft remains extra-artculay.
The graft should be tensioned with the joint in a reduced
position, the forearm in full pronation, and the elbow
ruction(676 Part VI Sports and Overase Injuries tothe Elbow
in approximately 45 degrees of flexion, Jensioning may
be increased by suturing the two limbs of the graft
together in one or more points.
Treatment of Associated Pathology
Associated pathology is addressed as needed Com-
monly, lateral collateral ligament complex insufficiency
is associated to radial head nonunion, malunion or
c
FIGURE 48-7 A to C, Alternatively, the two limbs of the
‘graft may be sutured together. One end of the graft
may be passed through the humeral tunnels, and the
reconstruction may be tensioned applying proximal
traction to the yoke tendon and distal traction to the
Tonger limb of the graf.
resection, as well as coronoid deficiency. Radial head
replacement or coronoid reconstruction may be required
to completely restore elbow stability and function?
Patients with posterolateral rotatory instability and
associated tennis elbow require débridement and repair
of the area of tendinosis at the time of ligamentous
reconstruction. Interestingly, some patients may present
with 2 combination of stiffness and ligamentous insu
ficiency, and require ligamentous reconstruction and
contracture release as a single or staged procedure. It is
important to understand the need to consider recon
struction of the radial head to improve the outcome of
treatment
Underlying Deformity
‘As mentioned earlier, posterolateral rotatory instability
may be secondary to chronic ligamentous attrition sec~
ondary to cubitus varus deformity. Depending on the
severity of the deformity and the cosmetics concerns of
the patient, a valgus-producing distal humerus osteot-
‘omy may need to be associated to the ligamentous
reconstruction, Otherwise, the reconstruction may fail
by chronic atuition of the tendon graft subjected to
abnormal forces. Osteotomy should probably be con
sidered in patients with more than 15 degrees of varus
angulation Experimental data in cadavers has shown
increased strain on the lateral collateral ligament complex
with more than 25 degrees of varus angulation and
increased opening of the joint line space with more than
20 degrees of varus angulation’
Postoperative Management
‘The ligamentous reconstruction needs to be protected
for the first few weeks after surgery in order to prevent
graft stretching and recurrent instability. Elbow exten
sion and forearm supination increase tension on the
graft; pronation’ and active muscle contraction. protect
the graft? Initially after surgery, the elbow is immobi=
lized: i 90 degrees of flexion and forearm pronation
Motion may be initiated in a few days, as long as a
brace is used to neutralize the forces across the elbow,
‘maintain the forearm in pronation, and block extension
beyond 50 degrees. However, cast immobilization for
three to six weeks should be considered when compli=
ance with postoperative protection is questionable, and
itis recommended by some surgeons for most patients,
provided they do not show a tendency to develop stff=
ness, Neutralization using a dynamic external fixator
during 5 to 6 weeks should be considered for those cases
in which more protection is needed; extemal fixation
has occasionally been used as the main treatment
modality”® Postoperative management may need to be
changed to accommodate associated surgical procedures
such as contracture release, in which early motion is
more criticalThe patient should understand the detrimental role
of gravitational stresses om the lateral collateral ligament
complex. Most activities of daily living place the lateral
side of the elbow facing upward, the weight of the
forearm and any additional weight held by the hand
will esult in tensile stresses on the lateral elbow struc~
tures. During the first § months after surgery, the patient
should learn how to protect the elbow against gravila~
tional stresses. Active overhead flexion and extension
exercises with the forearm in pronation protect the
lateral collateral ligament reconstruction by avoiding
gravitational stresses and increasing joint stability
through active muscle contraction’ Exercises to increase
the strength of the extensor-supinator group also help
stabilize the joint, and they may be initiated during the
first few days after surgery. Unrestricted activities are
usually allowed 6 months after surgery.
Outcome
Nestor et al” reported the initial experience at the Mayo
Clinic with 11 consecutive cases followed for a mean of|
55 years (range, 2 to 56 years), The lateral collateral
ligament complex was imbricated in three patients and
reconstructed with a tendon graft (seven patients) or
triceps fascia (one patiend, Stability was obtained in 10
patients, and seven were considered to have an excellent
functional result
More recently, Sanche7-Sotelo et al” updated the
Mayo Clinic experience with 44 cases followed for a
mean of 6 yeats (2 to 15 years). Ligament repair or
imbrication was performed in 12 cases and formal liga~
ment reconstruction in 32 Surgery restored stability in
all but five patients, Results were considered satisfactory
in 73% of the cases, and 8649 of the patients were sul
jectively satisfied with the procedure, Interestingly, the
results were better in patients with traumatic etiology
and subjective instability. Tendon reconstruction pro=
vided a better result than ligament repair
Other authors have reported similar outcomes in the
treatment of this condition. Lee et al” reported on 10
patients with posterolateral rolatory instability treated
with ligament repair (four cases) or reconstruction (six
cases). Instability was corrected in all cases, and results
were graded as satisfactory in eight patients. All patients
with an excellent result had reconstruction with a tendon
graft, a finding consistent with the above-mentioned
study from the Mayo Clinie. When patients present with
posterolateral rotatory instability and a resected radial
head, reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament
complex combined with radial head replacement seems
to provide satisfactory results" Arthroscopic capsu-
lar plication” and arthroscopic electrothermal shrink
age"* have been reported as an alternative to tendon
reconstruction, but the findings of better overall results
with tendon reconstruction versus ligament repair?
Chapter 48 Lateral Collateral Ligament Insutficiency 677
and the concerns raised by the use of electrothermal
shrinkage of the shoulder make arthroscopic surgery less
attractive for the treatment of posterolateral rotatory
instability.
ODriscoll etal specifically reported on the outcome
of surgical treatment for tardy posterolateral rotatory
instability associated with cubitus varus. Twenty-one
elbows were treated with osteotomy combined with
reconstruction of the lateral collateral ligament complex
(even patients), ligament reconstruction alone (10
patients), or osteotomy alone (four patients) and. fol-
lowed for a mean of 3 years, Ulnar nerve transposition
with or without triceps transposition was required in
five patients, At most recent follow-up, three patients
had persistent posterolateral rotatory instability, and two
of these were rated as poor due to associated arthritis
with severe pain
SUMMARY
Insufficiency of the lateral collateral ligament complex
may be secondary to trauma, chronic attrition, or iat=
rogenic injury, The resulting posterolateral. rotatory
instability may present with recurrent dislocations,
mechanical symptoms, ot lateraksided elbow pain.
Instability may be demonstrated on physical examina~
tion in the office or with the patient under anesthesia
Stress radiographs or fluoroscopy may be used to docu
ment the instability. Most patients with chronic symp-
tomaticinsufficiency improve with surgical reconstruction
Usinga tendon graft. Ligament repair without augmenta-
tion does not seem to be as effective in the chronic
setting, but the procedure should be an integral part
of the surgical treatment of acute elbow fracture
dislocations. After surgery, the ligamentous repair or
reconstruction should be protected from gravitational
stresses and excessive tensile loads, Associated patho
ogy affecting the radial head, coronoid, or the rest
of the joint should be addressed as needed. Patients
with tardy posterolateral rotatory instability secondary
to cubitus varus often require association of a distal
humerus osteotomy.
References
1. Abe, M, Ishizu,T, and Morikawa, |: Posterolateral zotatory
instabilty of the elbow after posttraumatic cubitus varus.
J. Shoulder Elbow Surg. 6405, 1997
Auvind, CH, and) Hargreaves, D. G: Table top
relocation test-New clinical test for posterolateral
rotatory instability of the elbow |. Shoulder Elbow Surg,
15500, 2006,
5, Beuerlein, M. J, Reid. J.T, Schemitsch, E H., and McKee,
M.D. Fifect of cistal humeral varus deformity on strain