You are on page 1of 70

Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Created & Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC


©2013 All Right Reserved

INTRODUCTION
The Heliport Risk & Liability Assessments Tool was developed in collaboration with multiple government, commercial and private agencies, organizations and
individuals to help better quantify and understand the overall risk and liability exposures for helicopters, helicopter operations and heliport owners at individual
heliport site locations. This tool is designed to be an open, free of charge, safety enhancement program for the helicopter industry that can be incorporated into
any organizations safety management system.

CONCEPT
This Tool is based on a very specific question set that was developed over a four year period of in-depth analysis and field testing. These questions are derived
from the DOT/FAA Heliport Design Advisory Circular AC 150/5390-2C, the National Fire Protection Associations (NFPA) 418 Heliport Standards and the
Occupational Health and Safety (OSHA) standards, as well as industry best practices. This is a semi-quantitative analysis tool that aligns to AS/NZS ISO-
31000:2009 Risk Management principles and guidelines and adopts IEC ISO 31010 risk assessment techniques methodology.

GOAL
Provide a standardized and tangible risk assessment program to asses site specific risk and liability exposures at individual heliports based on objective criteria
and comprehensive specifications that will produce results which can then be incorporated into an organizations safety management system for eliminating
identified risks as well as incorporating operational risk mitigation strategies as necessary to provide a safer aeronautical infrastructure.

SPECIAL THANKS TO THE FOLLOWING KEY CONTRIBUTORS


National EMS Pilots Association (NEMSPA)
Larry Buehler, Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) / retired
Ray E Stanton, RES Aviation Services, Inc.
Ray Syms, HeliExperts International LLC
Paul Civers, CEO Riskfacillitator
Marty Rincon Insurance Underwriter and OSHA Specialist
Aaron Watts, IT Specialist and Programmer

Questions, comments and suggestions regarding the Heliport Risk & Liability Analysis Tool should be directed to
the principal author and architect: Rex J Alexander
Email: rex@heliexp.com Web: www.heliexpertsinternational.com

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Created & Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC


©2013 All Right Reserved

OVERVIEW
The primary information for conducting the heliport risk evaluation assessment is contained on the "Heliport Assessment Report Tab". Heliport dimension are
based on the largest design helicopter that will service a particular heliport and whether it is located on the ground or a rooftop. To calculate these dimensions
you may use the appropriate ground or rooftop "Heliport Calculator Tab" or the formulas found in the FAA heliport advisory circular. There is a list of the most
common helicopters found in the U.S. on the "Acft Wt. & Size Chart Tab". If the helicopter used is not identified on this list there is space at the bottom of the list
to enter data for up to 5 additional helicopters. An obstruction calculator for determining the maximum height a vertical obstruction can be in relationship to its
distance from the FATO has also been included.

HELIPORT ASSESSMENT PROGRAM


The heliport risk and liability assessment report form is broken down into 15 very specific areas for consideration.
The basic information at the top of the form should be self-explanatory. Users should verify that all pertinent information entered is correct.
The toolkit has three risk calculators built into it. They are the; "Overall Risk & Liability Exposure Percentage (%)", "Critical Elements Risk & Liability Exposure
Level" and the "Risk Analysis Profile". These calculators will self-populate based on the answers provided for each question.

COMPLETING THIS REPORT


There are 75 questions, with each question having the potential for a YES, NO or N/A answer.
There are only a few questions with the potential for an N/A or non-applicable answer.
Each question has been given a numerical value for weight based on its overall impact on safety and liability.
There are 12 questions that have been identified as "Critical Elements" and are marked accordingly on the report form.
These 12 critical elements are weighted individually with a much higher risk score due to their significant impact on safety and liability.
All worksheets on the Risk and Liability Assessment Toolkit have been designed to be printed off.

RISK AND LIABILITY REMEDIATION


Upon completing the form, the overall risk and liability assessment of a particular heliport will be indicated.
Some items identified as risks may be easily and inexpensively rectified quickly while others may be more challenging and costly and take time.
Programs should identify those areas that they can improve immediately and then prioritize those areas that will take longer.
In those cases where a risk cannot be mitigated by removal or modification an appropriate operational limitation should be implemented.

DISCLAIMER
This risk assessment tool is designed to assist the user in better understanding and identifying the different types and severity of risks and their associated
liabilities at an individual heliport. In turn this assessment can and should be used to assist the user in creating an overall safer environment for everyone
involved. This risk assessment tool is however not designed to be a substitute for a thorough safety audit performed by a qualified and properly trained aviation
professional. Instituting the incorrect mitigation strategy or improperly implementing the correct one can create a hazardous and unsafe operational
environment. The owner of the heliport has the ultimate responsibility for providing a compliant and safe operational aviation environment and should seek
expert aeronautical participation when appropriate. Always check HeliExperts International web site for the most up-to-date version.

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Created & Provided By: HeliExperts International LL


©2013 All Right Reserved
Heliport Risk & Liability Assessment Report
Version 1.3 / Oct 2013
Deg° Min' Sec"
Latitude: N
Longitude: W
Heliport Location:
Address: Design Helicopter
City: Max Gross Wt. (lbs.)
State& Zip: Overall Length (ft.)
FAA Identifier: Rotor Diameter (ft.)
Owner: TLOF Size (measured)
Inspected By: FATO Size (measured)
Date Inspected: Safety Area (measured)

Overall Risk & Liability Exposure Percentage (%)


Low Medium High Extreme Risk Analysis Profile
0 to 12 13 to 24 25 to 36 > 36 ITEM #No.
Total "YES" 0
Critical Elements Risk & Liability Exposure Level Total "NO" 0
Low Medium High Extreme Total "NA"
0 1 to 2 3 to 4 >5 0 Total Risk Potential (yes+no)
0
0
Risk Percentage (y/y+n)
COMMENTS:

3 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Answer Values: YES Ground Based


NO Rooftop/Elevated Based
NA

4 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

NO Heliport Risk Program Questionnaire Select


Answer
Mgmt

1 Has someone been officially designated as the heliport manager?


2 Is the heliport manager's contact information current and on file with the FAA & State DOT?
3 Is the heliport licensed by the State Department of Transportation it resides in?
Documentation

4 Does the owner of the heliport have a copy of the most current FAA and DOT paperwork on file?
5 Is there a Letter Of Agreement in place between all of the helicopter operators and the owner of the heliport?
6 Is there an Airport Master Record (FAA Form 5010) for the heliport on file with the FAA?
7 Has the information on the Airport Master Record been verified and updated in the past calendar year?
8 Have all current and future expansion projects been reported to the DOT and FAA on form 7480-1and 7460 as required?
9 Is there a documented and published operational procedures guide for the heliport?
10 Is the TLOF size appropriately predicated on the largest helicopter that is intended to operate at this location? *(rooftop and ground are different)
11 Is the TLOF size appropriate for the type of operations being conducted at this site?
TLOF

12 Is the TLOF surface area in serviceable condition and properly sloped to meet NFPA code requirements?
13 Does the heliport have an intact and functional non-skid surface?
14 Is the TLOF designed for the heaviest design aircraft that will service it?
15 Is the TLOF area clear of all obstacles? (*only perimeter lights can be higher than the TLOF, limited to 2")
16 Is the FATO size large enough for the appropriate design aircraft that will service the heliport?
FATO

17 Is the FATO area clear of all obstacles? (*only perimeter lights can be higher than the TLOF, limited to 2")
18 Is the FATO area clear of all loose debris?
19 Does a designated safety area surround the FATO?
Safety

20 Is the safety area the appropriate size as predicated on the design aircraft and markings of the FATO & TLOF?
Area

21 Is the safety area clear of all obstacles?


22 Is the safety area clear of all loose debris?
23 Are there at least two unobstructed approach and departure paths into and out of the heliport area?
Departure
Approach

24 Are the approach and departure paths aligned with the prevailing winds and meet FAA suggested separation criteria?
25 Are the approach and departure paths constructed to minimize the noise impact on the surrounding community?
26 Is the 8:1 approach/departure surface & 2:1 transition surface free of obstacle penetrations?
27 Is a windsock properly sited in close proximity to the heliport?
28 Is the windsock the appropriate size? (*some locations may require multiple windsocks)
Windsock

29 Is the windsock visible to the pilot from both the landing area and from the air?
30 Is the windsock installed so that it reflects accurate wind velocity and direction?
31 Is the windsock appropriately lighted for night operations?
32 Is the windsock and its supporting structure in serviceable condition?
33 Is the heliport's TLOF and FATO markings in accordance with the FAA A/C guidelines and in good condition?
Markings &
Signage

34 Are directional arrows utilized to indicate the preferred approach and departure routes?
35 Are all pertinent OSHA and NFPA safety signs posted?

5 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Markings &
36 Signage Are all pedestrian access points and holding areas appropriately located and correctly marked?
37 If there is a high magnetic variance in the vicinity of the heliport is it appropriately indicated to flight crews with notices and signage?

6 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

38 Is the TLOF perimeter area lighted in accordance with FAA guidelines for night operations?
39 Are all of the heliport perimeter lights in working condition?
Lighting

40 Are landing direction lights utilized to indicate the preferred approach and departure routes for night operations?
41 Are all flood lights installed and placed so as not to interfere with the flight crews night vision?
42 Is there a heliport beacon of the appropriate type and design installed on site?
43 Are all onsite & offsite obstructions to navigation correctly lighted in accordance with FAA guidelines?
44 Is there a preventative maintenance program in place for all facilities and equipment associated with the heliport facility?
45 Is the area within a 200 foot perimeter of the edge of the FATO free and clear of trees?
46 Has the area surrounding the heliport and the flight paths been rezoned or controlled as suggested in the heliport advisory circular?
General
Safety

47 Is the area within 200 feet of the landing area policed regularly for loose items and debris (F.O.D.)?
48 Is there a formalized and documented recurring heliport safety inspection program in place?
49 Is there an alternate plan in place for inclement weather or the closing of the heliport?
50 Is there a documented system in place to notify helicopter pilots in a timely manner of safety issues and hazards?
51 Are all flammable, compressed gas & liquid gas storage tanks located the appropriate distance from the heliport?
52 If refueling is available on site is there a fuel/water separator system in place in the drainage system?
Safety

53 If refueling is available on site is there a fuel spill kit on site?


Fire

54 Is the heliport appropriately sloped in the correct direction?


55 Are all required National Fire Protection Codes (NFPA) complied with?
56 Is there a fire extinguisher of the appropriate size and type correctly located at the heliport site?
57 Is there a non-obstructing security barrier installed around the heliport to prevent unauthorized access?
Security

58 Are security personnel provided during helicopter operations?


59 Is the heliport area monitored by close circuit television cameras?
60 Are there posted warning signs that indicate authorized personnel only at the heliport?
61 Are there written standard operating procedures (SOP) in place for staff to follow?
Training &
Education

62 Is there a documented initial and annual training program, with testing, in place for staff members?
63 Are there snow and ice removal protocols in place?
64 Is there an Emergency Action Plan and training program in place for first responders that follows the NFPA 418 Annex-B guidelines?
65 Does the staff train with local helicopter providers/operators and first responders at least on an annual basis?
66 Does the surrounding roofing area of the heliport meet a UL 790 Class A fire rating or higher?
Heliports
Elevated

67 Is a safety net located at all areas that are elevated greater than 30 inches around the heliport?
68 Is the safety net material resistant to environmental effects, fire and meet the required size & design specifications?
69 Are there two correctly located separate emergency egress points leading off of the elevated heliport and then off the roof?
70 If the heliport is collocated on occupied spaces, is there a foam fire suppression system in place that meets NPFA guidelines?
71 Is the heliport listed in the "Commercial General Liability Coverage Policy"?
Insurance

72 Is there a certificate of insurance from each helicopter operator on file with the owner of the heliport?
73 Does the facility that owns the heliport also have "Aviation Related Activities Liability Coverage"?
74 If a helicopter is based at the facility does the facility have "Ground Hangar Keepers Liability Coverage"?
75 If refueling or maintenance is performed on site does the facility have "Products and Completed Operations Liability Coverage"?
7 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Experts International LLC


ht Reserved

e
Score
0
0
0
0

8 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

9 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Critical
Value Score
Element

1 0
1 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
1 0
4 0 X
3 0
2 0
1 0
4 0 X
4 0 X
3 0
4 0 X
2 0
3 0
2 0
4 0 X
2 0
4 0 X
2 0
1 0
4 0 X
3 0
1 0
2 0
2 0
1 0
2 0
2 0
1 0
3 0

10 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

1 0
2 0

11 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

2 0
2 0
1 0
3 0
1 0
4 0 X
1 0
2 0
1 0
2 0
1 0
2 0
2 0
4 0 X
2 0
2 0
2 0
4 0 X
3 0
3 0
2 0
1 0
1 0
2 0
2 0
2 0
3 0
2 0
3 0
4 0 X
3 0
3 0
4 0 X
2 0
2 0
2 0
2 0
2 0
12 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

Explanations
1 Has someone been officially designated as the heliport manager?

It is important for there to be a point of contact who is responsible for insuring the upkeep, safety and usability of any he
should be listed by name and their contact information should be readily accessible to anyone within the organization th
heliport as well as anyone who may operate at the heliport. For liability reasons this individual should be a direct emplo
the facility.

2 Is the heliport manager's contact information current and on file with the FAA & State DOT?

Check the latest information listed by the FAA on the heliport's airport master record, FAA Form 5010, and insure that th
information is up to date and listed. (web site to check 5010: http://www.gcr1.com/5010web). If the information is incor
changes have or are going to be made submit FAA Form 7480-1, Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration, with th
information. If changes are minor a corrected FAA form 5010 should suffice.

3 Is the heliport licensed by the State Department of Transportation it resides in?

Contact the State Department of Transportation, Aeronautics section where the heliport is located and verify that the he
licensed, if required, by the state and that the documentation is on file and up-to-date.

4 Does the owner of the heliport have a copy of the most current FAA and DOT paperwork on file?

From a risk and liability standpoint it is very important for heliport owners to maintain current copies of all DOT and FAA
heliport on file along with all other pertinent historical information to include architectural and building plans for the site
safety inspections and audits.

5 Is there a Letter Of Agreement in place between all of the helicopter operators and the owner of the heliport?

Having a letter of agreement between the owner of the heliport and those that routinely conduct operations at the helip
way to insure that everyone understands the expectation for safety and operations. This also establishes a system for
who the individual s are at each organization having responsibility and approving authority for that organization.

6 Is there an Airport Master Record (FAA Form 5010) for the heliport on file with the FAA?

If a heliport's paperwork is not current and on file with the FAA it opens the door to potential legal and regulatory expos
airport master record on file the heliport will also not have an FAA identifier issued to it and will not be included in any o
bases. (Web site to check your FAA Form 5010 currency: http://www.gcr1.com/5010web)

7 Has the information on the Airport Master Record been verified and updated in the past calendar year?

13 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

It is very important that anytime the heliport environment changes that the information on the FAA form 5010 be update
reflect these changes. At a minimum the heliport owner should verify the information on the FAA airport master record
annual basis by submitting an FAA form 5010 to the FAA and indicating all minor changes that have occurred. Major ch
submission of a FAA form 7480.

8 Have all current and future expansion projects been reported to the DOT and FAA on form 7480-1 and 7460 as required?

It is very important that all of the construction projects within the vicinity of the heliport that may affect the navigable airs
the heliport are reported to the FAA so as to insure that there are no unknown safety hazards introduced into the flight e
77 requires persons proposing certain construction or alteration to give 45-day notice to the FAA of their intent. Use FA
Notice of Proposed Construction or Alteration to provide notification. See https://oeaaa.faa.gov for more information an
form. Heliport owners should own, control or have protection through zoning or easement restrictions for that airspace
their heliport to prevent hazardous obstructions as well as the potential of closing the heliport.

9 Is there a documented and published operational procedures guide for the heliport?

All heliports should have at a minimum a basic standard operating procedures guide that outlines accepted practices fo
operations. The more elaborate and challenging the environment is the more in-depth the guide should ultimately be.
heliport along with the helicopter operators should coordinate in the design of this guide. The information in the guide s
accessible and disseminated to all operators. All updates and changes should be approved and disseminated in a time

14 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

10 Is the TLOF size appropriately predicated on the largest helicopter that is intended to operate at this location?

The Touchdown and Lift-Off Area (TLOF) for a heliport is predicated on the rotor diameter of the largest helicopter that
specific heliport location for ground based pads and the overall length for rooftop/elevated pads. Refer to FAA/DOT ad
150/5390-2C for the dimensions for the majority of helicopters utilized today. A good rule of thumb is to contact those h
within a 150 nautical mile radius that may use this facility and confirm what type of equipment they operate.

11 Is the TLOF size appropriate for the type of operations being conducted at this site?

Does the size of the TLOF area allow for the safe operation and maneuvering of not only the helicopter but also any an
equipment used at this location? Example: If the location is at a hospital is the TLOF area large enough to safely oper
equipment utilized in patient transport.

12 Is the TLOF surface area in serviceable condition and properly sloped to meet NFPA code requirements?

There should not be any uneven areas on the TLOF surface that a helicopter could catch a skid on and the general con
surface should be intact without the presence of deterioration which in turn could create loose and hazardous debris. C
recommended for the TLOF area. Asphalt is strongly discouraged given its tendency to rut under the wheels or skids o
helicopter which has proven to be a factor in some rollover accidents.

13 Does the heliport have an intact and functional non-skid surface?

For concrete construction a broom brushed, rough nonskid surface is highly desirable. For metal construction, a silicon
surface should be incorporated. Do not paint or stain the heliport without incorporating some method of insuring a non-
remains intact.

14 Is the TLOF designed for the heaviest design aircraft that will service it?

The TLOF and any supporting TLOF structure must be capable of supporting the dynamic loads of the design helicopte
should also be prominently marked on the TLOF in accordance with the FAA heliport advisory circular.

15 Is the TLOF area clear of all obstacles? (*only perimeter lights can be higher than the TLOF, limited to 2")

Within the designated boundaries of the TLOF area there should be absolutely no vertical penetration of the overlappin
the heliport. This includes lighting fixtures on the heliport perimeter which can only penetrate the surface plane of the T
research on heliport accidents has shown that striking protruding objects on or around the TLOF area and surrounding
cause of helicopter accidents at heliports.

16 Is the FATO size large enough for the appropriate design aircraft that will service the heliport?

15 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

The minimum width, length, or diameter of the FATO needs to be at least 1.5 times the overall length (D) of the design
minimum distance between the TLOF perimeter and the FATO perimeter should not be less than the distance (¾ D - ½
overall length and RD is the rotor diameter of the design helicopter.

17 Is the FATO area clear of all obstacles? (*only perimeter lights can be higher than the TLOF, limited to 2")

All fixed objects projecting above the TLOF elevation except for lighting fixtures, which are restricted to a maximum of 2
should be removed (for hospital heliports NO other obstacles other than gurney ramp guards of 4" are permitted in the
ground level heliports, nothing except the TLOF perimeter lights should be higher than the TLOF plane. The FAA and H
removing all above ground objects (even if they are no higher than then TLOF) to the extent practical.

18 Is the FATO area clear of all loose debris?

Helicopters produce a significant amount of downwash during normal operations which can transform loose debris into
missiles. Clear the FATO area of all loose debris and treat the area as needed to prevent loose stones and any other fl
by rotor wash. Small stone or mulch should never be used in the FATO area.

16 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

19 Does a designated safety area surround the FATO?

The safety area surrounds the FATO. The safety area extends outward on all sides of the FATO for a distance of at lea
diameter (RD) but not less than 10 feet at the minimum an can be up 1/2 the rotor diameter (RD) and not less than 30 f
the heliport markings. Refer to FAA heliport advisory circular.

20 Is the safety area the appropriate size as predicated on the design aircraft and markings of the FATO & TLOF?

The standards for the width of the safety area can be found in FAA AC 150/5390 2C. The width is the same on all sides
safety area is predicated on the provision or absence of standard heliport markings. The safety area can extend into cl

21 Is the safety area clear of all obstacles?

Remove all fixed objects within a safety area projecting above the TLOF elevation except for lighting fixtures, which ma
maximum of 2 inches (5 cm). For ground level, heliport nothing except the lights should be higher than the TLOF. The
recommends removing all above ground objects (even if they are not higher than the TLOF) to the extent practical.

22 Is the safety area clear of all loose debris?

Helicopters produce a significant amount of downwash during normal operations which can transform loose debris into
missiles. The safety area should be clear of all flammable materials and treated to prevent loose stones and any other
caused by rotor wash. Small stone or mulch should never be used in the safety area.

23 Are there at least two unobstructed approach and departure paths into and out of the heliport area?

The purpose of the approach/departure airspace is to provide sufficient airspace clear of hazards to allow for safe appr
departures from the TLOF during normal operations as well as emergency situations. Two or more properly designed fl
operational arcs provide additional safety margins and operational flexibility for different environmental and operational
flight path has inherent hazards and require operational limitations be implemented. They are discouraged by both the

24 Are the approach and departure paths aligned with the prevailing winds and meet FAA suggested separation criteria?

Preferred approach/departure paths should be aligned with the predominant wind direction so downwind operations are
crosswind operations are kept to a minimum. To accomplish this, design the heliport to have more than one approach/d
other approach/departure paths on the assessment of the prevailing winds and separate such flight paths and the prefe
at least 135 degrees.

25 Are the approach and departure paths constructed to minimize the noise impact on the surrounding community?

17 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

The primary purpose of the approach/departure airspace is to provide sufficient airspace clear of hazards to allow for sa
and departures from the TLOF. During the very beginning of a proper heliport site selection process for a heliport, dista
residential and other sensitive land-uses (schools, churches) should be a top priority. That effort should include locatin
approach and departure paths as far as practical from those sensitive areas. Use of the area over industrial/commercia
interstates, roads, railroads, rivers and vacant property for flight paths is encouraged. Use of the helicopter manufactur
flight techniques as well as avoiding low angles of approach and departure are also proven techniques.

26 Is the 8:1 approach/departure surface & 2:1 transition surface free of penetrations?

An approach/departure surface is centered on each approach/departure path. The approach/departure path starts at th
and slopes upward at 8:1 (8 units horizontal in 1 unit vertical) for a distance of 4,000 feet (1,219 m) where the width is 5
a height of 500 feet (152 m) above the heliport elevation. There should be no obstruction penetration of the approach/d
Transitional surfaces start from the edges of the FATO parallel to the flight path center line, and from the outer edges o
approach/departure surface, and extend outwards at a slope of 2:1 (2 units horizontal in 1 unit vertical) for a distance o
from the centerline.

27 Is a windsock properly sited in close proximity to the heliport?

The windsock should be located so it provides the pilot with valid wind direction and speed information in the vicinity of
all wind conditions. At some locations more than one wind cone may be necessary to provide the pilot with all the wind
for safe operations. To avoid presenting an obstruction hazard, locate the wind cone(s) outside the safety area, so it do
approach/departure or transitional surfaces.

18 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

28 Is the windsock the appropriate size? (*some locations may require multiple windsocks)

The two types listed are the L-806 - those mounted on low mass supporting structures and the L-807 - those mounted o
structures. The L-807 is the predominant windsock utilized at most heliports. The L -806 & L-807 assembly uses a win
feet (2.5 m) in length and 18 inches (0.45 m) in throat diameter. Larger windsocks sizes for mounting on the L-806 and
available but are not generally appropriate for most heliports.

29 Is the windsock visible to the pilot from both the landing area and from the air?

The wind cone should be located so it provides the pilot with valid wind direction and speed information in the vicinity o
all wind conditions. The wind cone should be located so a pilot on the approach path is able to see it clearly when the
feet (150 m) from the TLOF. The pilot should also be able to see the wind cone while located on the TLOF.

30 Is the windsock installed so that it reflects accurate wind velocity and direction?

The wind cone should be located so it provides the pilot with valid wind direction and speed information in the vicinity o
all wind conditions. Two or more windsocks may be required to provide pilots with adequate information if the area has
patterns.

31 Is the windsock appropriately lighted for night operations?

For night operations the wind cone should be illuminate either internally or externally to ensure it is clearly visible. If th
located in close proximity of the heliport it will also require a red obstruction light as well.

32 Is the windsock and its supporting structure in serviceable condition?

The windsock should rotate freely through its 360° of travel. The opening of the windsock should be firmly affixed to the
and the fabric should be intact. The windsock should be free to rotate within its full range of travel without catching upo
The windsock should be of a high visibility color, preferably orange, which is discernible from the surrounding area and
not be overly faded.

33 Is the heliport's TLOF, FATO, Weight & Size markings in accordance with the FAA A/C guidelines and in good condition?

TLOF markings should well define the perimeter of a paved or hard surfaced TLOF with a continuous, 12-inch-wide (30
markings should be in good condition and clearly disenable by pilots at altitude. Hospital heliports are marked with a re
cross. Maximum weight and maximum helicopter size should be included on all heliports. The minimum height of the “H
Locate the “H” in the center of the TLOF and orient it on the axis of the preferred approach/departure path. For NVG o
interior and exterior outline on all markings is highly recommended for better visual acuity during NVG operations.

34 Are directional arrows utilized to indicate the preferred approach and departure routes?

19 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

Flight path alignment guidance marking. An optional flight path alignment guidance marking consists of one or more arr
preferred approach/departure direction(s). These should be placed on the TLOF, FATO and/or safety area surface. Th
arrow(s) is 18 inches (50 cm) in width and at least 10 feet (3 m) in length and may be scaled down for smaller helipads

35 Are all pertinent OSHA and NFPA safety signs posted?

OSHA standards require the incorporation of signage that warns of a high noise environment and potential eye injury e
standards require the incorporations of a "No Smoking" sign. Additional recommendations are: Heliport Warning Sign f
Electronic Surveillance and Authorized Personnel Only. All signs must be kept outside the FAA designated safety area
Safety Area, 8:1 app/dep path and 2:1 transition area) so as not to introduce a vertical hazard into the flight environmen

36 Are all pedestrian access points and holding areas appropriately located and correctly marked?

There should be appropriate signage outside of the heliport area that identifies safe locations for pedestrians to wait as
access and egress points to the heliport. Ground markings should be incorporated on ramp areas and access points in
environment (TLOF, FATO & Safety Area) to properly direct and warn passengers of their surrounding environment.

20 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

37 If there is a high magnetic variance in the vicinity of the heliport is it appropriately indicated to flight crews with notices a

At some heliport locations it has been discovered that there is a high degree of electro magnetic interference (EMI) in th
been shown to create navigational errors in instrumentation. At sites where this occurs an appropriate warning markin
installed on the heliport to alert flight crews of these dangers along with an appropriate sign at the heliport ingress and
signs must be kept outside the safety area so as not to introduce a vertical hazard into the flight environment. This info
included in all pilot briefing documentation and on the FAA form 5010.

38 Is the TLOF perimeter area lighted in accordance with FAA guidelines for night operations?

Use green lights meeting the requirements of FAA Airports Engineering Brief 87, Heliport Perimeter Light for Visual Met
Conditions (VMC), to define the TLOF perimeter. If more than one TLOF is load bearing, use flush lights. Where only th
bearing, raised green omnidirectional lights, mounted as to not extend above the FAA 2" maximum can be used. Use a
light fixtures per side of a square or rectangular TLOF. Locate a light at each corner, with additional lights uniformly spa
corner lights. Round TLOFs will need at least 8 lights. Elevated TLOFs can have the perimeter lights mounted on the
is utilized.

39 Are all of the heliport perimeter lights in working condition?

Verify that all lighting fixtures are secure and in proper working condition. If the heliport lighting is incorporated with a d
control photo cell you may be able to cover the cell to activate the lights. If the lighting system incorporates pilot radio c
radio with the appropriate frequency may be needed to complete this test.

40 Are landing direction lights utilized to indicate the preferred approach and departure routes for night operations?

For locations which conduct night operations, landing direction lights to assist pilots in recognizing the preferred, unobs
and departure paths, into and out of a heliport landing area are highly recommended.

41 Are all flood lights installed and placed so as not to interfere with the flight crews night vision?

It is highly recommended that heliport flood lights utilized for loading, unloading, refueling and maintenance operations
separate switch so that they may be turned off during flight operations. If any flood lights are on during operations they
positioned so as not to interfere with the flight crews night vision during nighttime operations.

42 Is there a heliport beacon of the appropriate type and design installed on site?

Heliport beacons, while not required provide two very valuable safety functions. First they assist pilots in finding unfam
before they get near the heliport location. Secondly they alert other pilots in the area to the existence of the heliport an
other aviation traffic in the area.

43 Are all onsite & offsite obstructions to navigation correctly lighted in accordance with FAA guidelines?

21 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

It is often difficult for pilot to see unmarked wires, antennas, poles, cell towers, and similar objects, even in the best day
time to take evasive action. All obstructions that meet the FAA criteria for an obstruction to airspace near a heliport nee
appropriately and correctly marked for both day and night operations accordingly. Guidance on marking and lighting ob
in FAA AC 70/7460-1, Obstruction Marking and Lighting.

44 Is there a preventative maintenance program in place for all facilities and equipment associated with the heliport facility?

A well-constructed and documented preventive maintenance program can be an invaluable tool for ensuring that a helip
environment remain capable of supporting safe an efficient operations at all times time.

45 Is the area within a 200 foot perimeter of the edge of the FATO free and clear of trees?

Trees are notorious for doing one thing very well; growing. Trees that may be at an acceptable height when they were
invariably grow to a height that will be incompatible with safe helicopter operations at a heliport at some point in the futu
never be located within 200' of the FATO area unless their mature height will not remain clear of all FAA designated sur
obstruction height at 200 feet from the edge of the FATO under an approach/departure path is 25 feet.

22 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

46 Has the area surrounding the heliport and the flight paths been rezoned or controlled as suggested in the heliport adviso

Where state and local statutes permit, the FAA encourages heliport operators to promote the adoption of the following z
ensure the heliport will continue to be viable and to protect the investment in the facility. General guidance on drafting
would limit building and object heights can be found in FAA AC 150/5190-4, "A Model Zoning Ordinance to Limit Height
Airports". All heliport owners are encouraged to protect their required airspace by owning or controlling the areas wher
use under a flight path could jeopardize heliport and helicopter safety.

47 Is the area within 200 feet of the landing area policed regularly for loose items and debris (F.O.D.)?

During landing and takeoff operations helicopters produce a significant amount of rotor wash, downward flowing air, wh
hazardous environment for those on the ground if there are loose items or debris in the general vicinity of the heliport.
of air is directly proportional to the size and weight of the design helicopter in operation. The area surrounding the FAT
should be free of all loose debris and material. F.O.D. is an aviation acronym meaning "Foreign Object Damage". Heli
rotor blades are highly susceptible to damage from such objects.

48 Is there a formalized and documented recurring heliport safety inspection program in place?

At a minimum an annual inspection program should be adopted to verify that the heliport still meets all FAA, NFPA and
and standards. This is a good time to check the information on the FAA Form-5010, airport master record, for accuracy
inspections should be accomplished by an aviation professional with the prerequisite background and experience nece
this task. Quarterly, monthly, weekly and daily safety inspection programs are considered to be a valuable safety pract

49 Is there an alternate plan in place for inclement weather or the closing of the heliport?

A written protocol identifying an accepted alternate landing area or alternate procedures to be used during periods of in
that render a heliport unusable or unsafe should be constructed and disseminated to all parties.

50 Is there a documented system in place to notify helicopter pilots in a timely manner of safety issues and hazards?

When a change occurs at a heliport or a heliport is deemed non-operational for safety reasons a written procedure for n
helicopter operators in the area and their pilots that service that heliport should be in constructed and disseminated to a

51 Are all flammable, compressed gas & liquid gas storage tanks located the appropriate distance from the heliport?

NFPA-418 4.3.3 "Aboveground flammable liquid storage tanks, compressed gas storage tanks, fuel storage tanks and
storage tanks shall be laterally located at least 50 ft. (15.2m) from the edge of the FATO area as defined in FAA AC 150
Design Advisory Circular". As a good safety practice these structures should also not be located under an identified ap
departure path.

52 If refueling is available on site is there a fuel/water separator system in place in the drainage system?

23 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

For heliports that have collocated refueling areas, specifically rooftop locations, there should be a fuel/water separator
fuel and from entering a structure’s drainage system.

53 If refueling is available on site is there a fuel spill kit on site?

For those locations that have refueling capability an appropriate fuel spill kit is a requirement. For locations where a he
based but refueling is not conducted, a fuel spill kit is highly recommended.

54 Is the heliport appropriately sloped in the correct direction?

All heliports NFPA-418 4.5 "The landing pad shall be designed so that fuel spills are directed away from access/egress
passenger holding areas." For rooftop heliports, NFPA-418 5.3 Landing pad pitch, "The rooftop landing pad shall be pi
drainage at a slope of 0.5 percent to 2 percent." 5.3.1 "The pitch of the pad shall be designed to protect, at a minimum
path, passenger holding area, rooftop hangar, and fire protection activation systems."

24 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

55 Are all required National Fire Protection Codes (NFPA) complied with?

The majority of the jurisdictions in the United States have adopted the National Fire Protection Association (NFPA) stan
standards for code. In those areas NFPA standards have been adopted the following NFPA standards are specific to h
adhered to NPFA-10/Standards for Portable Fire, NFPA-99/Standards for Health Care Facilities, NFPA-407/Standards
Servicing, NFPA-409/Standards for Aircraft Hangars and NFPA-418/Standards for Heliports (*WARNING, this is not an
refer to NFPA codes for additional information.)

56 Is there a fire extinguisher of the appropriate size and type correctly located at the heliport site?

NFPA-418 Chapter 9 Portable Fire Extinguishers section 9.1 General "The selection, installation, and maintenance of p
extinguishers shall comply with NFPA-10, Standards for Portable Fire Extinguishers. 9.2 Minimum Requirements "At le
extinguisher as specified in Table 9.2 shall be provided for each takeoff and landing area, parking area, and fuel storag

57 Is there a non-obstructing security barrier installed around the heliport to prevent unauthorized access?

Heliports can be a curiosity to the general public and the inclusion of a non-obstructive barrier around the heliport envir
assist in dissuading the average individual from entering the heliport environment. All barriers must be installed so as n
obstruction to helicopter operations.

58 Are security personnel provided during helicopter operations?

During all landing and takeoff operations it is highly recommended that properly trained security staff be in place to ens
security is in place and add an additional level of safety to all operations.

59 Is the heliport area monitored by close circuit television cameras?

While close circuit surveillance systems are not a true preventive measure, they can be a very useful tool after an incid
Surveillance imagery should be recorded and maintained on file for an appropriate length of time and should be access
staff member 24/7. It is recommended at locations that utilize close circuit surveillance systems that a motion detector
the heliport with an audio output installed at the appropriate observation station.

60 Are there posted warning signs that indicate authorized personnel only at the heliport?

Heliports can be a curiosity to the general public and should be identified as limited access areas authorized personnel
be kept outside the safety area so as not to introduce a vertical hazard into the flight environment.

61 Are there written standard operating procedures (SOP) in place for staff to follow?

25 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

Heliport owners should create standard operating procedures guide for their heliports and their employees to include no
well as emergency operations and protocols.

62 Is there a documented initial and annual training program, with testing, in place for staff members?

It is highly recommended that all staff member who come into contact with a heliport, either directly or indirectly, should
initial and recurring annual safety training program. All training should be appropriately documented in each staff memb

63 Are there snow and ice removal protocols in place?

If the heliport is located in an area that is susceptible to snow and ice accumulation there needs to be a documented po
for snow and ice removal to include what chemicals, materials and techniques are acceptable for snow and ice remova
are prohibited. Rock Salt or sodium based deicing materials should never be used on heliport due to there extreme co
aircraft. Rock Salts also has the capability to become a potential missile during operations, possibly causing personal i
clearing equipment can also inflict costly damage to the heliport environment.

26 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

64 Is there an Emergency Action Plan and trading program in place for first responders that follows the NFPA 418 Annex-B g

NFPA-418 Annex-B "Heliport Emergency Planning and Training for Safety Personnel" provides a check list for designin
for heliport personnel and first responders.

65 Does the staff train with local helicopter providers/operators and first responders at least on an annual basis?

Heliport owners should conduct, on an annual basis, safety training with the helicopter operators who service their loca
is essential for ensuring proper coordination efforts exist in case of an actual emergency.

66 Does the surrounding roofing area of the heliport meet a UL 790 Class A fire rating or higher?

NFPA-418 Landing Pad Construction Material 5.4.2 "The contiguous building roof covering within 50 ft. (15.2) of the lan
have a Class A rating." UL 790 1.3 Class A "Class A roof coverings are effective against severe fire test exposures. Un
roof coverings of this class afford a high degree of fire protection to the roof deck, do not slip from position, and are not
produce flying brands."

67 Is a safety net located at all areas that are elevated greater than 30 inches around the heliport?

The FAA recommends fall protection for all platforms elevated 30 inches (76 cm) or higher. Vertical railings or fences s
inside the heliport environment (TLOF, FATO & Safety Area) since they could be safety hazards to helicopter operations

68 Is the safety net material resistant to environmental effects, fire and meet the required size & design specifications?

Safety nets should be constructed of materials that are highly resistant to environmental effects and that are as firepro
resistant as possible. Natural or manmade fibers such as nylon, hemp or cotton should never be used for heliport safe
should not less than 5 feet (1.5 m) wide or and when ever possible located greater than 12 inches below the TLOF. Saf
designed to have a load carrying capability of 25 lbs./sq. ft. (122 kg/sq. m) and should tilt back towards the heliport are
supporting structure or the safety net itself should ever extend higher than the TLOF surface plane.

69 Are there two correctly located separate emergency egress points leading off of the elevated heliport and then off the roo

NFPA-418, Heliport Standards, section 5.5 Means of Egress stipulates; "Two means of egress from the rooftop landing
building's egress system shall be provided." Section 5.5.1 stipulates; “The egress points shall be located at least 90 d
other as measured from the center of the landing pad (TLOF)”. Section 5.5.2 stipulates; "The egress points shall be re
each other, Not less than 30 ft. (9.1m) apart."

70 If the heliport is collocated on occupied spaces, is there a foam fire suppression system in place that meets NPFA guidel

27 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

NFPA-418 Heliport Standards, Section 5.1 General, "The requirements in Chapter 4 & 5 shall apply to all rooftop landin
Fire Protection; "A foam fire-extinguishing system with either a fixed discharge outlet(s) in accordance with 5.7.3 or a ho
accordance with 5.7.4 shall be designed and installed to protect the rooftop landing pad, unless otherwise permitted. 5
discharge rate for the fire-extinguishing systems shall be 0.10gpm/ft2 (4.1 L/min-m2) for aqueous film forming foam (AF

71 Is the heliport listed in the "Commercial General Liability Coverage Policy"?

Heliports, like all other asset located on an owner’s property, must be properly annotated in the correct insurance cover
ensure adequate coverage exists in case of any incident or accident occurring at that site.

72 Is there a certificate of insurance from each helicopter operator on file with the owner of the heliport?

All commercial operators performing operations at a particular heliport location should provide the heliport owner with a
insurance naming the owner, owners employees, owners agents, contractors and consultants of the heliport in the insu
additionally named insured.

28 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

73 Does the facility that owns the heliport also have "Aviation Related Activities Liability Coverage"?

This should be a standard insurance policy that any owner of a heliport should carry to insure fully liability coverage for
Consult with your insurance company to insure that this coverage is applicable and if so is in place.

74 If a helicopter is based at the facility does the facility have "Ground Hangar Keepers Liability Coverage"?

If the heliport in question is only a stopping off point for picking up or dropping off and a helicopter does not routinely ba
then this coverage may not apply. If however the heliport in question is the primary site which a helicopter is maintaine
you should investigate the need for this additional coverage with your insurance provider for additional clarification.

75 If refueling or maintenance is performed on site does the facility have "Products and Completed Operations Liability Cov

Having a refueling site or operation or a maintenance facility and or hangar on site in conjunction with a heliport does in
liability issues that need to be addressed with your insurance company to insure full coverage for any liability issues tha
them.

29 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

uring the upkeep, safety and usability of any heliport. This person
accessible to anyone within the organization that owns the
easons this individual should be a direct employee of the owner of

FAA & State DOT?

ster record, FAA Form 5010, and insure that the point of contact
cr1.com/5010web). If the information is incorrect or major
of Proposed Construction or Alteration, with the correct
ice.

es in?

re the heliport is located and verify that the heliport has been
d up-to-date.

DOT paperwork on file?

to maintain current copies of all DOT and FAA paperwork for the
de architectural and building plans for the site as well as any past

ators and the owner of the heliport?

that routinely conduct operations at the heliport is an excellent


perations. This also establishes a system for keeping track of
proving authority for that organization.

with the FAA?

e door to potential legal and regulatory exposure. If there is no


er issued to it and will not be included in any of the federal data
1.com/5010web)

ted in the past calendar year?

30 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

e information on the FAA form 5010 be updated by the owner to


information on the FAA airport master record is correct on an
ll minor changes that have occurred. Major changes may require

and FAA on form 7480-1 and 7460 as required?

f the heliport that may affect the navigable airspace surrounding


nown safety hazards introduced into the flight environment. Part
5-day notice to the FAA of their intent. Use FAA Form 7460-1,
https://oeaaa.faa.gov for more information and to download the
ning or easement restrictions for that airspace that is critical to
closing the heliport.

he heliport?

dures guide that outlines accepted practices for helicopter


more in-depth the guide should ultimately be. The owner of the
gn of this guide. The information in the guide should be easily
hould be approved and disseminated in a timely manner.

31 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

intended to operate at this location?

e rotor diameter of the largest helicopter that will service that


rooftop/elevated pads. Refer to FAA/DOT advisory circular
day. A good rule of thumb is to contact those helicopter vendors
at type of equipment they operate.

at this site?

ering of not only the helicopter but also any and all ancillary
is the TLOF area large enough to safely operate all specialty

meet NFPA code requirements?

pter could catch a skid on and the general condition of the


n could create loose and hazardous debris. Concrete is highly
its tendency to rut under the wheels or skids of a parked

hly desirable. For metal construction, a silicon or other nonskid


incorporating some method of insuring a non-skid surface

rting the dynamic loads of the design helicopter. This information


FAA heliport advisory circular.

gher than the TLOF, limited to 2")

lutely no vertical penetration of the overlapping airspace above


h can only penetrate the surface plane of the TLOF by 2". HEI
on or around the TLOF area and surrounding areas is a major

service the heliport?

32 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

1.5 times the overall length (D) of the design helicopter. The
should not be less than the distance (¾ D - ½ RD) where D is the

gher than the TLOF, limited to 2")

xtures, which are restricted to a maximum of 2" above the TLOF,


gurney ramp guards of 4" are permitted in the FATO area). For
e higher than the TLOF plane. The FAA and HEI recommends
TLOF) to the extent practical.

erations which can transform loose debris into dangerous flying


eeded to prevent loose stones and any other flying debris caused
rea.

33 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

n all sides of the FATO for a distance of at least 1/3 the rotor
the rotor diameter (RD) and not less than 30 feet depending on

t and markings of the FATO & TLOF?

0/5390 2C. The width is the same on all sides. The width of the
markings. The safety area can extend into clear airspace.

elevation except for lighting fixtures, which may project a


e lights should be higher than the TLOF. The FAA and HEI
her than the TLOF) to the extent practical.

erations which can transform loose debris into dangerous flying


treated to prevent loose stones and any other flying debris
safety area.

nd out of the heliport area?

irspace clear of hazards to allow for safe approaches to and


y situations. Two or more properly designed flight paths or
ity for different environmental and operational condition. A single
plemented. They are discouraged by both the FAA and HEI.

and meet FAA suggested separation criteria?

ant wind direction so downwind operations are avoided and


he heliport to have more than one approach/departure path. Base
s and separate such flight paths and the preferred flight path by

impact on the surrounding community?

34 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

ficient airspace clear of hazards to allow for safe approaches to


port site selection process for a heliport, distances from
top priority. That effort should include locating the heliport and its
eas. Use of the area over industrial/commercial property,
encouraged. Use of the helicopter manufacturers sound reduction
re are also proven techniques.

etrations?

path. The approach/departure path starts at the edge of the FATO


ce of 4,000 feet (1,219 m) where the width is 500 feet (152 m) at
e no obstruction penetration of the approach/departure surface.
t path center line, and from the outer edges of
ts horizontal in 1 unit vertical) for a distance of 250 feet (76 m)

ection and speed information in the vicinity of the heliport under


necessary to provide the pilot with all the wind information needed
wind cone(s) outside the safety area, so it does not penetrate the

35 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

tiple windsocks)

ng structures and the L-807 - those mounted on rigid supporting


orts. The L -806 & L-807 assembly uses a windsock that is eight
windsocks sizes for mounting on the L-806 and L-807 poles are

he air?

rection and speed information in the vicinity of the heliport under


proach path is able to see it clearly when the helicopter is 500
d cone while located on the TLOF.

ection?

rection and speed information in the vicinity of the heliport under


lots with adequate information if the area has complex wind flow

or externally to ensure it is clearly visible. If the wind cone is


on light as well.

g of the windsock should be firmly affixed to the mounting frame


hin its full range of travel without catching upon any structure.
h is discernible from the surrounding area and the fabric should

the FAA A/C guidelines and in good condition?

ced TLOF with a continuous, 12-inch-wide (30 cm), white line. All
titude. Hospital heliports are marked with a red “H” in a white
on all heliports. The minimum height of the “H” is 10 feet (3 m).
eferred approach/departure path. For NVG operations a black
tter visual acuity during NVG operations.

parture routes?

36 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

guidance marking consists of one or more arrows to indicate the


e TLOF, FATO and/or safety area surface. The shaft of the
and may be scaled down for smaller helipads as appropriate.

h noise environment and potential eye injury environment. NFPA


ecommendations are: Heliport Warning Sign for pedestrians,
e kept outside the FAA designated safety area (e.g. TLOF, FATO,
uce a vertical hazard into the flight environment.

and correctly marked?

ntifies safe locations for pedestrians to wait as well as appropriate


orporated on ramp areas and access points inside the heliport
sengers of their surrounding environment.

37 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

opriately indicated to flight crews with notices and signage?

ree of electro magnetic interference (EMI) in the area which have


ere this occurs an appropriate warning marking should be
n appropriate sign at the heliport ingress and egress point. All
al hazard into the flight environment. This information should be

night operations?

rief 87, Heliport Perimeter Light for Visual Meteorological


s load bearing, use flush lights. Where only the TLOF is load
ove the FAA 2" maximum can be used. Use a minimum of three
ach corner, with additional lights uniformly spaced between the
can have the perimeter lights mounted on the safety fence if one

If the heliport lighting is incorporated with a dusk to dawn light


If the lighting system incorporates pilot radio controlled lighting, a
.

d departure routes for night operations?

ssist pilots in recognizing the preferred, unobstructed approach


ommended.

ht crews night vision?

oading, refueling and maintenance operations should be on a


any flood lights are on during operations they should be
ghttime operations.

site?

ctions. First they assist pilots in finding unfamiliar heliport far


s in the area to the existence of the heliport and the potential for

ordance with FAA guidelines?

38 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

wers, and similar objects, even in the best daylight weather, in


an obstruction to airspace near a heliport need to be
ordingly. Guidance on marking and lighting objects can be found

equipment associated with the heliport facility?

n be an invaluable tool for ensuring that a heliport and its


all times time.

ear of trees?

y be at an acceptable height when they were planted will


perations at a heliport at some point in the future. Trees should
will not remain clear of all FAA designated surfaces. Maximum
ach/departure path is 25 feet.

39 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

or controlled as suggested in the heliport advisory circular?

ators to promote the adoption of the following zoning measures to


t in the facility. General guidance on drafting an ordinance that
-4, "A Model Zoning Ordinance to Limit Height of Objects Around
space by owning or controlling the areas where a structure or land

tems and debris (F.O.D.)?

mount of rotor wash, downward flowing air, which can create a


r debris in the general vicinity of the heliport. This downward flow
er in operation. The area surrounding the FATO and out to 200'
nym meaning "Foreign Object Damage". Helicopter engines and

n program in place?

that the heliport still meets all FAA, NFPA and OSHA requirements
Form-5010, airport master record, for accuracy. Annual safety
prerequisite background and experience necessary to accomplish
s are considered to be a valuable safety practice.

the heliport?

ate procedures to be used during periods of inclement weather


eminated to all parties.

ely manner of safety issues and hazards?

nal for safety reasons a written procedure for notifying all


hould be in constructed and disseminated to all parties.

e appropriate distance from the heliport?

ed gas storage tanks, fuel storage tanks and liquefied gas


ge of the FATO area as defined in FAA AC 150/5290-2B, Heliport
ould also not be located under an identified approach and

ace in the drainage system?

40 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

ations, there should be a fuel/water separator installed to keep

kit is a requirement. For locations where a helicopter is normally


d.

el spills are directed away from access/egress points and


pad pitch, "The rooftop landing pad shall be pitched to provide
ad shall be designed to protect, at a minimum, the primary egress
on systems."

41 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

tional Fire Protection Association (NFPA) standards as their


he following NFPA standards are specific to heliports and must be
r Health Care Facilities, NFPA-407/Standards for Aircraft Fuel
dards for Heliports (*WARNING, this is not an all-inclusive list,

ted at the heliport site?

e selection, installation, and maintenance of portable fire


inguishers. 9.2 Minimum Requirements "At least one portable fire
nd landing area, parking area, and fuel storage area.

o prevent unauthorized access?

on-obstructive barrier around the heliport environment can greatly


ronment. All barriers must be installed so as not to constitute an

operly trained security staff be in place to ensure adequate

e, they can be a very useful tool after an incident occurs.


ppropriate length of time and should be accessible by an onsite
it surveillance systems that a motion detector be incorporated at
station.

t the heliport?

as limited access areas authorized personnel only. All signs must


to the flight environment.

o follow?

42 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

heir heliports and their employees to include normal operations as

n place for staff members?

h a heliport, either directly or indirectly, should be provided with an


appropriately documented in each staff members file.

umulation there needs to be a documented policy and procedure


ques are acceptable for snow and ice removal and which ones
r be used on heliport due to there extreme corrosiveness to
during operations, possibly causing personal injury. Some snow-
ment.

43 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

responders that follows the NFPA 418 Annex-B guidelines?

y Personnel" provides a check list for designing a training program

ponders at least on an annual basis?

he helicopter operators who service their locations. This training


ual emergency.

fire rating or higher?

ding roof covering within 50 ft. (15.2) of the landing pad edge shall
ffective against severe fire test exposures. Under such exposures,
oof deck, do not slip from position, and are not expected to

s around the heliport?

(76 cm) or higher. Vertical railings or fences should not be used


ould be safety hazards to helicopter operations.

t the required size & design specifications?

o environmental effects and that are as fireproof and flame


cotton should never be used for heliport safety nets. Safety nets
d greater than 12 inches below the TLOF. Safety net should be
) and should tilt back towards the heliport area but neither the
n the TLOF surface plane.

g off of the elevated heliport and then off the roof?

Two means of egress from the rooftop landing pad to the


he egress points shall be located at least 90 degrees from each
5.5.2 stipulates; "The egress points shall be remotely located from

ression system in place that meets NPFA guidelines?

44 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

Chapter 4 & 5 shall apply to all rooftop landing facilities". 5.7


harge outlet(s) in accordance with 5.7.3 or a hose line(s) in
op landing pad, unless otherwise permitted. 5.7.2 "The foam
1 L/min-m2) for aqueous film forming foam (AFFF).

y"?

perly annotated in the correct insurance coverage policy to


urring at that site.

th the owner of the heliport?

cation should provide the heliport owner with a certificate of


tors and consultants of the heliport in the insurance policy as an

45 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created and Provided
Tool By: HeliExperts International LLC

ties Liability Coverage"?

hould carry to insure fully liability coverage for their organization.


cable and if so is in place.

ar Keepers Liability Coverage"?

pping off and a helicopter does not routinely base at this location
he primary site which a helicopter is maintained on a regular basis
urance provider for additional clarification.

oducts and Completed Operations Liability Coverage"?

ar on site in conjunction with a heliport does introduce additional


insure full coverage for any liability issues that may occur from

46 of 70 www.heliexp.com
©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created
Tool
and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

GROUND Heliport Layout Diagram & Dimensions Calculator

Largest Design Helicopter Ground Based TLOF Size: The TLOF (length, width, or diameter)
A-109 A be at least equal to the Rotor Diameter (RD) of the largest des
Helicopter Dimensions (feet) helicopter that will service the heliport.
Overall Length Rotor Diameter
42.8 36.1 Estimated Dimensions

*all measurements are rounded to the nearest foot


Refer to AC 150/5390-2C

Directions 64

In the "Green" block provided above,


select the largest design helicopter
from the drop down list. If your 36
helicopter is not listed enter the
information on the Acft Wt. & Size 14
Chart where provided at the bottom.
The chart will self populate all of the
necessary information. Reference FAA
AC 150/5390-2C for heliport size 88
criteria and the helicopter manufacture
for all helicopter dimensions.
TLOF

12 FATO
Keep in mind that the smallest
TLOF for a hospital heliport
is 40 feet by 40 feet, or larger as
predicated by the size of the
largest servicing design helicopter SAFETY AREA

88
Safety area size is predicated on
appropriate heliport markings.
Refer to AC 150/5390 2C for "Verify All Dimensions!"
additional criteria

Created & Provided By: HeliExperts Interna


©2013 All Right Reserved

This work sheet is only designed as a guide to help facilitate the layout of a
heliport's dimensions and does not relieve the controlling authority of its obligation
to verifying that all dimensions meet the guidelines set forth by all applicable FAA,
State and or local municipalities having jurisdiction.

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


This work sheet is only designed as a guide to help facilitate the layout of a
Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Created Tool
and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC
heliport's dimensions and does not relieve the controlling authority of its obligation
to verifying that all dimensions meet the guidelines set forth by all applicable FAA,
State and or local municipalities having jurisdiction.

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created
Tool
and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Calculator

OF (length, width, or diameter) should


iameter (RD) of the largest design
service the heliport.

Dimensions

ounded to the nearest foot

36 64

Y AREA
*not drawn to scale

Dimensions!"

ted & Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC


©2013 All Right Reserved

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created
Tool
and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created
Tool
and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

ROOFTOP/ELEVATED Heliport Layout Diagram & Dimensions Calculator

Largest Design Helicopter Elevated Heliports: If the FATO outside the TLOF is not load-bearing, incre
minimum width, length or diameter of the TLOF to the Overall Length (D) o
largest design helicopter that will service the heliport.
Helicopter Dimensions (feet)
Overall Length Rotor Diameter
Estimated Dimensions

*all measurements are rounded to the nearest foot


Refer to AC 150/5390-2C

Directions 0

In the "Green" block provided above,


select the largest design helicopter
from the drop down list. If your 0
helicopter is not listed enter the
information on the Acft Wt. & Size 0
Chart where provided at the bottom.
The chart will self populate all of the
necessary information. Reference FAA
AC 150/5390-2C for heliport size 0
criteria and the helicopter manufacture
for all helicopter dimensions.
TLOF

0 FATO
Keep in mind that the smallest
TLOF for a hospital heliport
is 40 feet by 40 feet, or larger as
predicated by the size of the
largest servicing design helicopter SAFETY AREA

0
Safety area size is predicated on
appropriate heliport markings.
Refer to AC 150/5390 2C for "Verify All Dimensions!"
additional criteria

Created & Provided By: HeliExperts Internat


©2013 All Right Reserved

This work sheet is only designed as a guide to help facilitate the layout of a
heliport's dimensions and does not relieve the controlling authority of its obligation
to verifying that all dimensions meet the guidelines set forth by all applicable FAA,
State and or local municipalities having jurisdiction.

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment
Created
Tool
and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

ons Calculator

the TLOF is not load-bearing, increase the


he TLOF to the Overall Length (D) of the
hat will service the heliport.

Dimensions

ounded to the nearest foot

0 0

Y AREA
*not drawn to scale

imensions!"

ed & Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC


©2013 All Right Reserved

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

OBSTRUCTION CALCULATOR: The chart below shows the relationship between the distance as
measured from the edge of the FATO to an object and the maximum allowable vertical height that object
can be in relationship to the 8:1 Approach/Departure Path Surface and the 2:1 Transitional Surfaces.

Distance From FATO (feet) 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45


8:1 Max Height (feet) 0.6 1.3 1.9 2.5 3.1 3.8 4.4 5.0 5.6
2:1 Max Height (feet) 2.5 5.0 7.5 10.0 12.5 15.0 17.5 20.0 22.5

Distance From FATO (feet) 105 110 115 120 125 130 135 140 145
8:1 Max Height (feet) 13.1 13.8 14.4 15.0 15.6 16.3 16.9 17.5 18.1
2:1 Max Height (feet) 52.5 55.0 57.5 60.0 62.5 65.0 67.5 70.0 72.5

Distance From FATO (feet) 205 210 215 220 225 230 235 240 245
8:1 Max Height (feet) 25.6 26.3 26.9 27.5 28.1 28.8 29.4 30.0 30.6
2:1 Max Height (feet) 102.5 105.0 107.5 110.0 112.5 115.0 117.5 120.0 122.5

Distance From FATO (feet) 305 310 315 320 325 330 335 340 345
8:1 Max Height (feet) 38.1 38.8 39.4 40.0 40.6 41.3 41.9 42.5 43.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 405 410 415 420 425 430 435 440 445
8:1 Max Height (feet) 50.6 51.3 51.9 52.5 53.1 53.8 54.4 55.0 55.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 505 510 515 520 525 530 535 540 545
8:1 Max Height (feet) 63.1 63.8 64.4 65.0 65.6 66.3 66.9 67.5 68.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 605 610 615 620 625 630 635 640 645
8:1 Max Height (feet) 75.6 76.3 76.9 77.5 78.1 78.8 79.4 80.0 80.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 705 710 715 720 725 730 735 740 745
8:1 Max Height (feet) 88.1 88.8 89.4 90.0 90.6 91.3 91.9 92.5 93.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 805 810 815 820 825 830 835 840 845

53 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

8:1 Max Height (feet) 100.6 101.3 101.9 102.5 103.1 103.8 104.4 105.0 105.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 905 910 915 920 925 930 935 940 945
8:1 Max Height (feet) 113.1 113.8 114.4 115.0 115.6 116.3 116.9 117.5 118.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 1005 1010 1015 1020 1025 1030 1035 1040 1045
8:1 Max Height (feet) 125.6 126.3 126.9 127.5 128.1 128.8 129.4 130.0 130.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 1105 1110 1115 1120 1125 1130 1135 1140 1145
8:1 Max Height (feet) 138.1 138.8 139.4 140.0 140.6 141.3 141.9 142.5 143.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 1205 1210 1215 1220 1225 1230 1235 1240 1245
8:1 Max Height (feet) 150.6 151.3 151.9 152.5 153.1 153.8 154.4 155.0 155.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 1305 1310 1315 1320 1325 1330 1335 1340 1345
8:1 Max Height (feet) 163.1 163.8 164.4 165.0 165.6 166.3 166.9 167.5 168.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 1405 1410 1415 1420 1425 1430 1435 1440 1445
8:1 Max Height (feet) 175.6 176.3 176.9 177.5 178.1 178.8 179.4 180.0 180.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 1505 1510 1515 1520 1525 1530 1535 1540 1545
8:1 Max Height (feet) 188.1 188.8 189.4 190.0 190.6 191.3 191.9 192.5 193.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 1605 1610 1615 1620 1625 1630 1635 1640 1645
8:1 Max Height (feet) 200.6 201.3 201.9 202.5 203.1 203.8 204.4 205.0 205.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 1705 1710 1715 1720 1725 1730 1735 1740 1745
8:1 Max Height (feet) 213.1 213.8 214.4 215.0 215.6 216.3 216.9 217.5 218.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 1805 1810 1815 1820 1825 1830 1835 1840 1845
8:1 Max Height (feet) 225.6 226.3 226.9 227.5 228.1 228.8 229.4 230.0 230.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 1905 1910 1915 1920 1925 1930 1935 1940 1945
8:1 Max Height (feet) 238.1 238.8 239.4 240.0 240.6 241.3 241.9 242.5 243.1

54 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Distance From FATO (feet) 2005 2010 2015 2020 2025 2030 2035 2040 2045
8:1 Max Height (feet) 250.6 251.3 251.9 252.5 253.1 253.8 254.4 255.0 255.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 2105 2110 2115 2120 2125 2130 2135 2140 2145
8:1 Max Height (feet) 263.1 263.8 264.4 265.0 265.6 266.3 266.9 267.5 268.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 2205 2210 2215 2220 2225 2230 2235 2240 2245
8:1 Max Height (feet) 275.6 276.3 276.9 277.5 278.1 278.8 279.4 280.0 280.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 2305 2310 2315 2320 2325 2330 2335 2340 2345
8:1 Max Height (feet) 288.1 288.8 289.4 290.0 290.6 291.3 291.9 292.5 293.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 2405 2410 2415 2420 2425 2430 2435 2440 2445
8:1 Max Height (feet) 300.6 301.3 301.9 302.5 303.1 303.8 304.4 305.0 305.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 2505 2510 2515 2520 2525 2530 2535 2540 2545
8:1 Max Height (feet) 313.1 313.8 314.4 315.0 315.6 316.3 316.9 317.5 318.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 2605 2610 2615 2620 2625 2630 2635 2640 2645
8:1 Max Height (feet) 325.6 326.3 326.9 327.5 328.1 328.8 329.4 330.0 330.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 2705 2710 2715 2720 2725 2730 2735 2740 2745
8:1 Max Height (feet) 338.1 338.8 339.4 340.0 340.6 341.3 341.9 342.5 343.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 2805 2810 2815 2820 2825 2830 2835 2840 2845
8:1 Max Height (feet) 350.6 351.3 351.9 352.5 353.1 353.8 354.4 355.0 355.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 2905 2910 2915 2920 2925 2930 2935 2940 2945
8:1 Max Height (feet) 363.1 363.8 364.4 365.0 365.6 366.3 366.9 367.5 368.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 3005 3010 3015 3020 3025 3030 3035 3040 3045
8:1 Max Height (feet) 375.6 376.3 376.9 377.5 378.1 378.8 379.4 380.0 380.6

55 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Distance From FATO (feet) 3105 3110 3115 3120 3125 3130 3135 3140 3145
8:1 Max Height (feet) 388.1 388.8 389.4 390.0 390.6 391.3 391.9 392.5 393.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 3205 3210 3215 3220 3225 3230 3235 3240 3245
8:1 Max Height (feet) 400.6 401.3 401.9 402.5 403.1 403.8 404.4 405.0 405.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 3305 3310 3315 3320 3325 3330 3335 3340 3345
8:1 Max Height (feet) 413.1 413.8 414.4 415.0 415.6 416.3 416.9 417.5 418.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 3405 3410 3415 3420 3425 3430 3435 3440 3445
8:1 Max Height (feet) 425.6 426.3 426.9 427.5 428.1 428.8 429.4 430.0 430.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 3505 3510 3515 3520 3525 3530 3535 3540 3545
8:1 Max Height (feet) 438.1 438.8 439.4 440.0 440.6 441.3 441.9 442.5 443.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 3605 3610 3615 3620 3625 3630 3635 3640 3645
8:1 Max Height (feet) 450.6 451.3 451.9 452.5 453.1 453.8 454.4 455.0 455.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 3705 3710 3715 3720 3725 3730 3735 3740 3745
8:1 Max Height (feet) 463.1 463.8 464.4 465.0 465.6 466.3 466.9 467.5 468.1

Distance From FATO (feet) 3805 3810 3815 3820 3825 3830 3835 3840 3845
8:1 Max Height (feet) 475.6 476.3 476.9 477.5 478.1 478.8 479.4 480.0 480.6

Distance From FATO (feet) 3905 3910 3915 3920 3925 3930 3935 3940 3945
8:1 Max Height (feet) 488.1 488.8 489.4 490.0 490.6 491.3 491.9 492.5 493.1

56 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013


Created & Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

©2013 All Right Reserved

50 55 60 65 70 75 80 85 90 95 100
6.3 6.9 7.5 8.1 8.8 9.4 10.0 10.6 11.3 11.9 12.5
25.0 27.5 30.0 32.5 35.0 37.5 40.0 42.5 45.0 47.5 50.0

150 155 160 165 170 175 180 185 190 195 200
18.8 19.4 20.0 20.6 21.3 21.9 22.5 23.1 23.8 24.4 25.0
75.0 77.5 80.0 82.5 85.0 87.5 90.0 92.5 95.0 97.5 100.0

250 255 260 265 270 275 280 285 290 295 300
31.3 31.9 32.5 33.1 33.8 34.4 35.0 35.6 36.3 36.9 37.5
125.0

350 355 360 365 370 375 380 385 390 395 400
43.8 44.4 45.0 45.6 46.3 46.9 47.5 48.1 48.8 49.4 50.0

450 455 460 465 470 475 480 485 490 495 500
56.3 56.9 57.5 58.1 58.8 59.4 60.0 60.6 61.3 61.9 62.5

550 555 560 565 570 575 580 585 590 595 600
68.8 69.4 70.0 70.6 71.3 71.9 72.5 73.1 73.8 74.4 75.0

650 655 660 665 670 675 680 685 690 695 700
81.3 81.9 82.5 83.1 83.8 84.4 85.0 85.6 86.3 86.9 87.5

750 755 760 765 770 775 780 785 790 795 800
93.8 94.4 95.0 95.6 96.3 96.9 97.5 98.1 98.8 99.4 100.0

850 855 860 865 870 875 880 885 890 895 900

57 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

106.3 106.9 107.5 108.1 108.8 109.4 110.0 110.6 111.3 111.9 112.5

950 955 960 965 970 975 980 985 990 995 1000
118.8 119.4 120.0 120.6 121.3 121.9 122.5 123.1 123.8 124.4 125.0

1050 1055 1060 1065 1070 1075 1080 1085 1090 1095 1100
131.3 131.9 132.5 133.1 133.8 134.4 135.0 135.6 136.3 136.9 137.5

1150 1155 1160 1165 1170 1175 1180 1185 1190 1195 1200
143.8 144.4 145.0 145.6 146.3 146.9 147.5 148.1 148.8 149.4 150.0

1250 1255 1260 1265 1270 1275 1280 1285 1290 1295 1300
156.3 156.9 157.5 158.1 158.8 159.4 160.0 160.6 161.3 161.9 162.5

1350 1355 1360 1365 1370 1375 1380 1385 1390 1395 1400
168.8 169.4 170.0 170.6 171.3 171.9 172.5 173.1 173.8 174.4 175.0

1450 1455 1460 1465 1470 1475 1480 1485 1490 1495 1500
181.3 181.9 182.5 183.1 183.8 184.4 185.0 185.6 186.3 186.9 187.5

1550 1555 1560 1565 1570 1575 1580 1585 1590 1595 1600
193.8 194.4 195.0 195.6 196.3 196.9 197.5 198.1 198.8 199.4 200.0

1650 1655 1660 1665 1670 1675 1680 1685 1690 1695 1700
206.3 206.9 207.5 208.1 208.8 209.4 210.0 210.6 211.3 211.9 212.5

1750 1755 1760 1765 1770 1775 1780 1785 1790 1795 1800
218.8 219.4 220.0 220.6 221.3 221.9 222.5 223.1 223.8 224.4 225.0

1850 1855 1860 1865 1870 1875 1880 1885 1890 1895 1900
231.3 231.9 232.5 233.1 233.8 234.4 235.0 235.6 236.3 236.9 237.5

1950 1955 1960 1965 1970 1975 1980 1985 1990 1995 2000
243.8 244.4 245.0 245.6 246.3 246.9 247.5 248.1 248.8 249.4 250.0

58 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

2050 2055 2060 2065 2070 2075 2080 2085 2090 2095 2100
256.3 256.9 257.5 258.1 258.8 259.4 260.0 260.6 261.3 261.9 262.5

2150 2155 2160 2165 2170 2175 2180 2185 2190 2195 2200
268.8 269.4 270.0 270.6 271.3 271.9 272.5 273.1 273.8 274.4 275.0

2250 2255 2260 2265 2270 2275 2280 2285 2290 2295 2300
281.3 281.9 282.5 283.1 283.8 284.4 285.0 285.6 286.3 286.9 287.5

2350 2355 2360 2365 2370 2375 2380 2385 2390 2395 2400
293.8 294.4 295.0 295.6 296.3 296.9 297.5 298.1 298.8 299.4 300.0

2450 2455 2460 2465 2470 2475 2480 2485 2490 2495 2500
306.3 306.9 307.5 308.1 308.8 309.4 310.0 310.6 311.3 311.9 312.5

2550 2555 2560 2565 2570 2575 2580 2585 2590 2595 2600
318.8 319.4 320.0 320.6 321.3 321.9 322.5 323.1 323.8 324.4 325.0

2650 2655 2660 2665 2670 2675 2680 2685 2690 2695 2700
331.3 331.9 332.5 333.1 333.8 334.4 335.0 335.6 336.3 336.9 337.5

2750 2755 2760 2765 2770 2775 2780 2785 2790 2795 2800
343.8 344.4 345.0 345.6 346.3 346.9 347.5 348.1 348.8 349.4 350.0

2850 2855 2860 2865 2870 2875 2880 2885 2890 2895 2900
356.3 356.9 357.5 358.1 358.8 359.4 360.0 360.6 361.3 361.9 362.5

2950 2955 2960 2965 2970 2975 2980 2985 2990 2995 3000
368.8 369.4 370.0 370.6 371.3 371.9 372.5 373.1 373.8 374.4 375.0

3050 3055 3060 3065 3070 3075 3080 3085 3090 3095 3100
381.3 381.9 382.5 383.1 383.8 384.4 385.0 385.6 386.3 386.9 387.5

59 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

3150 3155 3160 3165 3170 3175 3180 3185 3190 3195 3200
393.8 394.4 395.0 395.6 396.3 396.9 397.5 398.1 398.8 399.4 400.0

3250 3255 3260 3265 3270 3275 3280 3285 3290 3295 3300
406.3 406.9 407.5 408.1 408.8 409.4 410.0 410.6 411.3 411.9 412.5

3350 3355 3360 3365 3370 3375 3380 3385 3390 3395 3400
418.8 419.4 420.0 420.6 421.3 421.9 422.5 423.1 423.8 424.4 425.0

3450 3455 3460 3465 3470 3475 3480 3485 3490 3495 3500
431.3 431.9 432.5 433.1 433.8 434.4 435.0 435.6 436.3 436.9 437.5

3550 3555 3560 3565 3570 3575 3580 3585 3590 3595 3600
443.8 444.4 445.0 445.6 446.3 446.9 447.5 448.1 448.8 449.4 450.0

3650 3655 3660 3665 3670 3675 3680 3685 3690 3695 3700
456.3 456.9 457.5 458.1 458.8 459.4 460.0 460.6 461.3 461.9 462.5

3750 3755 3760 3765 3770 3775 3780 3785 3790 3795 3800
468.8 469.4 470.0 470.6 471.3 471.9 472.5 473.1 473.8 474.4 475.0

3850 3855 3860 3865 3870 3875 3880 3885 3890 3895 3900
481.3 481.9 482.5 483.1 483.8 484.4 485.0 485.6 486.3 486.9 487.5

3950 3955 3960 3965 3970 3975 3980 3985 3990 3995 4000
493.8 494.4 495.0 495.6 496.3 496.9 497.5 498.1 498.8 499.4 500.0

60 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Reference Material taken from DOT/FAA Advisory Circular 150/5390-2C Heliport Design (04/24/2012) / Appendix B
If your aircraft is not listed use the block labeled "Other" at the bottom to insert the correct information

*Verify all aircraft information with manufactures data*

Created & Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC Max Main Rotor Tail Rotor
©2013 All Right Reserved Takeoff Overall Rotor Blades Ground Hub To Rotor Blades Ground
Weight Length Height Dia. # Clear. Aft End Dia. # Clear.
Manufacture Model (lbs.) (feet) (feet) (feet) (No) (feet) (feet) (feet) (No) (feet)
Agusta Westland A-109 A 5,732 42.8 11.2 36.1 4 10.0 25.0 6.7 2 2.3
A -119 Koala 5,997 42.7 12.4 36.6 4 8.3 25.5 6.4 2 4.2
AW-109E Power 6,283 42.8 11.5 36.1 4 8.0 6.4 2 3.0
AW - 109S Grand 7,000 42.5 11.2 35.5 4 8.0 6.4 2 3.3
AW - 119 Ke 6,283 42.4 11.8 35.5 4 9.3 6.4 2 3.8
AW - 139 14,991 54.7 16.4 45.3 5 12.9 8.9 4 7.5
AW - 101 34,392 74.8 21.7 61.0 5 15.4 45.0 13.1 8.4
Westland WG30 12,800 52.2 15.5 43.7 4 12.5 0.1 8.0 4 7.5
Bell Helicopter B47G 2,950 43.6 9.3 37.1 2 5.0 25.0 6.1 2 3.5
B205B, UH-1H, Huey II, 210 10,500 57.8 14.5 48.0 2 7.3 33.1 8.5 2 5.9
B206B-1,2,3 3,350 39.2 10.8 33.4 2 6.0 22.5 5.2 2 2.1
B206L-1,3,4 4,450 42.4 10.9 37.0 2 6.4 24.0 5.4 2 3.5
B212 11,200 57.3 14.9 48.2 2 7.5 22.2 8.5 2 6.1
B214 ST 17,500 62.2 15.9 52.0 2 6.5 37.0 9.7 2 3.5
B222B, UT 8,250 50.3 12.2 42.0 2 9.2 29.2 6.9 2 2.7
B230 8,400 50.3 11.7 42.0 2 9.2 29.2 6.9 2 2.7
B407 5,250 41.4 10.2 35.0 4 7.8 24.3 5.4 2 3.2
B412EP, SP, HP 11,900 56.2 14.9 46.0 4 11.5 34.0 8.6 2 4.8
B427VFR 6,550 42.6 10.5 37.0 4 6.4 24.1 5.7 2 3.3
B429 7,000 43.0 13.3 36.0 4 8.5 5.4 2 3.5
B430 9,300 50.3 13.3 42.0 4 8.2 29.2 6.9 2 3.7
Boeing 107/CH-46E 24,300 84.3 16.7 51.0 3 15.0 59.0 51.0 3 17.0
234/CH-47F/G 54,000 99.0 19.0 60.0 3 11.0 69.0 60.0 3 19.0
Brantly / Hynes B-2B 1,670 28.1 6.9 23.8 3 4.8 16.0 4.3 2 3.0
305 2,900 32.9 8.1 28.7 3 8.0 19.0 4.3 2 3.0
Enstrom F28F/ 280FX 2,600 29.3 9.0 32.0 3 6.0 20.6 4.7 2 3.1

61 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

480 / TH-28 3,000 30.1 9.7 32.0 3 6.5 21.2 5.0 2 3.6
Erickson S-64E Air Crane 42,000 88.5 25.4 72.0 6 15.7 53.0 16.0 4 9.4
S-64F Air Crane 47,000 88.5 25.4 72.0 6 15.7 53.0 16.0 4 9.4
Eurocopter SA-315 Lama 5,070 42.3 10.2 36.2 3 10.1 20.0 6.3 3 3.2
SA-316/319 Alouette 4,850 33.4 9.7 36.1 3 9.8 27.7 6.3 3 2.8
SA-330 Puma 16,315 59.6 16.9 49.5 4 14.4 35.0 10.0 5 6.0
SA/AS-332 Super Puma 20,172 61.3 16.3 53.1 4 1436.0 36.0 10.0 5 7.1
SA-341/342 Gazelle 4,100 39.3 10.2 34.5 3 8.9 23.0 Fensetron 2.4

62 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

AS-350 A Star 4,960 42.5 11.0 35.1 3 10.6 25.0 6.1 2 2.3
AS-355 Twin Star 5,732 42.5 9.9 35.9 3 10.3 25.0 6.1 2 2.3
AS-360 Dauphin 6,600 43.3 11.5 37.7 4 10.7 25.0 Fensetron 2.6
AS-365 Dauphin
9,480 45.1 13.3 39.2 4 11.4 24.0 Fensetron 2.6
H-65 Dolphin
BO-105 5,732 38.9 11.5 32.3 4 9.8 23.0 6.2 2 6.1
BK-117 7,385 42.7 12.6 36.1 4 11.0 25.0 6.4 2 6.3
EC-120 3,780 37.8 11.2 32.8 3 10.1 24.6 Fensetron 2.1
EC-130 5,291 41.5 1.8 35.1 3 11.0 23.7 Fensetron 5.3
EC-135 6,250 40.0 11.5 33.5 4 11.0 22.8 Fensetron 5.6
EC-145 / UH-72A 7,904 42.7 13.0 36.1 4 11.3 28.0 6.4 2 10.7
EC-155 10,692 46.9 14.3 41.3 5 12.0 23.0 Fensetron 3.1
EC-224 24,332 64.0 16.3 53.1 5 15.1 38.0 10.3 4 3.5
Kaman K-Max / K1200 7,000 52.0 21.0 48.2 4 10.7 28.0 na na na
SH-G Seasprite 14,200 52.5 15.1 44.0 4 8.1 4
MD Helicopters MD500 E 3,000 30.8 8.4 26.4 5 8.2 4.6 2 2.0
MD530 F 3,100 32.1 8.1 27.4 5 8.0 19.0 4.8 2 1.3
MD520 N 3,350 32.1 9.7 27.4 5 9.2 17.0 Notar na na
MD600 N 4,100 36.9 9.8 27.5 6 9.2 Notar na na
MDExplorer / 902 6,500 38.8 12.0 33.8 5 12.0 23.0 Notar na na
Robinson R-22 Beta 1,370 28.8 8.9 25.2 2 8.8 16.0 3.5 2 4.1
R-44 Raven 2,500 38.3 10.8 33.0 2 10.5 22.0 4.8 2 3.8
R-66 Turbine 2,700 38.3 11.4 33.0 2 10.5 5.0 2 3.6
Farchild-Hiller 360/UH-12/OH-23 3,100 40.8 10.2 35.4 2 10.1 23.0 6.0 2 4.0
Rogerson-Hiller FH/RH-1100 3,500 41.3 9.2 35.3 2 9.5 24.0 6.0 2 3.0
Sikorsky HU-269A/A-1/B, TH55A 1,850 29.0 9.0 26.0 3 8.8 15.0 3.8 2 2.5
Schweizer 300C 2,050 30.8 8.7 26.8 3 8.7 15.3 4.3 2 2.8
300CB / Cbi 1,750 30.8 8.7 26.8 3 8.7 15.3 4.3 2 2.8
330 / 330SP /333 2,550 31.2 11.0 27.5 3 9.2 15.3 4.3 2 3.2
S-434 2,900 31.2 11.0 27.5 4 9.2 15.3 4.3 2 3.2
S-55 / H19 7,900 62.6 13.1 53.0 3 8.2 2
S-58 / H34 14,600 65.8 15.9 56.0 4 11.4 38.0 9.5 4 6.4
S-61 / H-3 22,000 72.8 19.0 62.0 5 12.3 40.0 10.3 5 8.6
S-76A/B/C/D 11,700 52.5 14.6 44.0 4 8.2 30.5 8.0 4 6.5
S-92 26,500 68.5 17.9 56.3 4 9.8 39.9 11.0 4 6.9
S-70i/UH-60L Blackhawk 22,000 64.8 16.8 53.8 4 7.7 38.0 11.0 4 6.6
CH-53K 74,000 99.5 28.8 79.0 7 17.0 59.6 20.0 4 9.5
Other Aircraft Helicopter-1

63 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Helicopter-2
Helicopter-3
Helicopter-4
Helicopter-5

64 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

4/24/2012) / Appendix B
orrect information
Version 1.3 / Oct 2013

Undercarriage Number Crew PAX


Type Length Width Engines # #
(feet) (feet) & Type (No) (No)
wheel 11.6 7.5 2-T 1-2 6-7
skid 13.4 5.5 1-T 1 6-7
wheel 11.5 7.1 2-T 1 7
wheel 12.3 7.1 2-T 1-2 6-7
skid 11.1 7.0 1-T 1 6-7
wheel 14.2 10.0 2-T 1-2 15
wheel 23.0 14.8 3-T 3 30
wheel 17.9 10.1 2+T 2 19
skid 9.9 7.5 1-P 1 2-3
skid 12.1 8.8 1-T 1
14
skid 8.1 6.7 1-T 1 4
skid 9.9 7.7 1-T 1 6
skid 12.1 8.8 2-T 1 14
w/s 12.1 8.6 2-T 2 16-17
w/s 12.2 7.8 2-T 1 9
w/s 12.2 7.8 2-T 1 9
skid 9.9 8.1 1-T 1 6
skid 12.1 9.5 2-T 1 14
skid 10.0 8.3 2-T 1 7
skid 9.9 8.8 2-T 1 7
w/s 12.4 9.2 2-T 1 9
wheel 24.9 14.5 2-T 3 25
wheel 22.5 10.5 2-T 3 44
skid 7.5 6.8 1-P 1 1
w/s 6.2 6.8 1-P 1 4
skid 8.0 7.3 1-P 1 2

65 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

skid 9.2 8.0 1-T 1 4


wheel 24.4 19.9 2-T 3 0
wheel 24.4 19.9 2-T 3 0
skid 10.8 7.8 1-T 1 4
wheel 11.5 8.5 1-T 1 4
wheel 13.3 9.8 2-T 2 20
wheel 17.3 9.8 2-T 2 24
skid 6.4 6.6 1-T 1 4

66 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

skid 4.7 7.5 1-T 1 6


skid 9.6 7.1 2-T 1 6
wheel 23.7 6.4 1-T 1 13
wheel 11.9 6.2 2-T 1
11
skid 8.3 8.2 2-T 1 5
skid 11.6 8.2 2-T 1 10
skid 9.4 6.8 1-T 1 4
skid 10.5 7.9 1-T 1 7
skid 10.5 6.6 2-T 1 6
skid 9.5 7.9 2-T 1 8
wheel 12.8 6.2 2-T 2 12
wheel 17.2 9.8 2-T 2 24
wheel 15.3 11.3 1-T 1 0
wheel 2-T 3 8
skid 8.1 6.3 1-T 1 4
skid 8.1 6.4 1-T 1 4
skid 8.1 6.3 1-T 1 4
skid 10.1 8.8 1-T 1 7
skid 7.3 7.3 2-T 1-2 6-7
skid 4.2 6.3 1-P 1 1
skid 4.2 7.2 1-P 1 3
skid 4.2 7.5 1-T 1 4
skid 8.3 7.5 1-P 1 3
skid 7.9 7.2 1-P 1 4
skid 8.3 6.5 1-P 1 1
skid 8.3 6.5 1-P 1 2
skid 8.3 6.5 1-P 1 1
skid 8.3 6.5 1-T 1 2-3
skid 8.3 6.5 1-T 1 2-3
wheel 1-T 2 12
wheel 28.3 14.0 2-T 2 16
wheel 23.5 14.0 2-T 3 28
wheel 16.4 8.0 2-T 2 12
wheel 20.3 10.4 2-T 2 19
wheel 29.0 9.7 2-T 3 12
wheel 27.3 13.0 3-T 3 55

67 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

68 of 70 www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013 GLOSSARY OF TERMS


The flight track helicopters follow when landing at or departing from a heliport. An approach/departure surface is
centered on each approach/departure path. The approach/departure path starts at the edge of the FATO and
Approach/Departure Path
slopes upward at 8:1 (8 units horizontal in 1 unit vertical) for a distance of 4,000 feet (1,219 m) where the width is
500 feet (152 m) at a height of 500 feet (152 m) above the heliport elevation.

The overall length of the helicopter, which is the dimension from the tip of the main or forward rotor to the tip of the
(D) (Formerly Overall Length or tail rotor, fin, or other rear-most point of the helicopter. This value is with the rotors at their maximum extension. See
“OL”) Figure B–1. If only the value of the rotor diameter (RD) is known, estimate the value for D using the relationship D =
1.2 RD (or conversely, RD = 0.83 D).

A single or composite helicopter that reflects the maximum weight, maximum contact load/minimum contact area,
Design Helicopter overall length (D), rotor diameter (RD), tail rotor arc radius, undercarriage dimensions, and pilot’s eye height of all
helicopters expected to operate at the heliport.

Design and construct the TLOF and any load-bearing surfaces to support the loads imposed by the design
Design Loads
helicopter and any ground support vehicles and equipment.

For design purposes, assume the dynamic load at 150 percent of the maximum takeoff weight of the design
Dynamic Load helicopter applied through the main undercarriage on a wheel-equipped helicopter or aft contact areas of skid-
equipped helicopter.

A heliport located on a rooftop or other elevated structure where the TLOF is at least 30 inches (76 cm) above the
Elevated Heliport
surrounding surface (a ground level heliport with the TLOF on a mound is not an elevated heliport).

A clear area at ground level or on the roof of a building capable of accommodating helicopters engaged in
Emergency Helicopter Landing
firefighting and/or emergency evacuation operations. An EHLF meets the definition of a heliport in this AC and
Facility (EHLF)
under Title 14 CFR Part 157.

Final Approach and Takeoff Area A defined area over which the pilot completes the final phase of the approach to a hover or a landing and from
(FATO) which the pilot initiates takeoff. The FATO elevation is the lowest elevation of the edge of the TLOF.

Any object having a substantial adverse effect upon the safe and efficient use of the navigable airspace by aircraft,
Hazard to Air Navigation upon the operation of air navigation facilities, or upon existing or planned airport/heliport capacity as determined by
the FAA.

The area of land, water, or a structure used or intended to be used for the landing and takeoff of helicopters,
Heliport
together with appurtenant buildings and facilities.

A heliport limited to serving helicopters engaged in air ambulance, or other hospital related functions. A designated
Hospital Heliports
helicopter landing area located at a hospital or medical facility is a heliport and not a medical emergency site.

An unprepared site at or near the scene of an accident or similar medical emergency on which a helicopter may
Medical Emergency Site land to pick up a patient in order to provide emergency medical transport. A medical emergency site is not a heliport
as defined by the FAA AC. Medical Emergency sites constitute higher risk a exposure than a standard heliport.

Well-designed approach/departure paths permit pilots to avoid downwind conditions and minimize crosswind
Prevailing Winds operations. Align the preferred flight approach/departure path, to the extent feasible, with the predominant wind
direction.

In determining approach/departure paths, take into account the obstructions in the vicinity of the heliport and, in
Obstructions
particular, those likely to be a hazard to air navigation.

(RD) Rotor Diameter The length of the main rotor, from tip to tip.

A defined area on a heliport surrounding the FATO intended to reduce the risk of damage to helicopters accidentally
Safety Area
diverging from the FATO.

For design purposes, the design static load is equal to the helicopter’s maximum takeoff weight applied through the
Static Load
total contact area of the wheels or skids.

Touchdown and Liftoff Area A load-bearing, generally paved area, normally centered in the FATO, on which the helicopter lands and/or takes
(TLOF). off.

Transitional Surfaces start from the edges of the FATO parallel to the flight path center line, and from the outer
edges of the 8:1 approach/departure surface, and extend outwards at a slope of 2:1 (2 units horizontal in 1 unit
Transitional Surfaces
vertical) for a distance of 250 feet (76 m) from the centerline. The transitional surface does not apply to the FATO
edge opposite the approach/departure surface.

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC


Heliport Risk and Liability Assessment Tool Created and Provided By: HeliExperts International LLC

Version 1.3 / Oct 2013 REFERENCES


1 14 CFR Part 77 Safe, Efficient Use and Preservation of the Navigable Airspace.
2 14 CFR Part 91 General Operating and Flight Rules.
Operating Requirements: Commuter and on demand operations and rules governing persons on
3 14 CFR Part 135
board such aircraft.
4 14 CFR Part 157 Notice of Construction, Alteration, Activation, and Deactivation of Airports.
5 AIM Aeronautical Information Manual
6 FAA AC 70/7460-1 Obstruction Marking and Lighting
7 FAA AC 150/5220-16 Automated Weather Observing Systems (AWOS) for Non-Federal Applications.
8 FAA AC 150/5190-4 A model Zoning Ordinance to Limit Height of Objects Around Airports
9 FAA AC 150/5230-4A Aircraft Fuel Storage, Handling, and Dispensing on Airports
10 FAA AC 150/5390-2C FAA Advisory Circulars on Heliports Design
11 FAA AC 150/5345-12 Specifications for Airport and Heliport Beacons
12 FAA AC 150/5345-27 Specifications for Wind Cone Assemblies
13 FAA AC 150/5345-39 FAA Specification L-853, Runway and Taxiway Retroreflective Markers.
14 FAA AC 150/5345-46 FAA Specification for Runway and Taxiway Light Fixtures.
15 FAA RD 90/8 Analysis of Helicopter Mishaps at Heliports, Airports, and Unimproved Sites
16 FAA RD 90/9 Analysis of Helicopter Accident Risk Exposure Near Heliports, Airports and Unimproved Sites
17 FAA RD 91/1 Composit Profiles of Helicopter Mishaps at Heliports and Airports
18 FAA RD 93/17 Safe Heliports Through Design and Planning
FAA FSIMS 8900.1 Vol-
19 Evaluation and Surveillance of Heliports
8/Chp-3/Sec-3
20
21 ICAO Doc 9859 International Civil Aviation Organization Safety Management Manual
22
23 NFPA 10 Standards for Portable Fire Extinguishers
24 NFPA 99 Standards for Health Care Facilities
25 NFPA 407 Standards for Aircraft Fuel Servicing
26 NFPA 409 Standards for Aircraft Hangars
27 NFPA 418 Standards for Heliports
28
29 ATA Spec. No. 103 Standard for Jet Fuel Quality Control at Airports
30
31 ISO 31000:2009 International Organization for Standards Risk Management Principles and Guidelines
32
33 OSHA 1910 Subpart-N Materials Handling and Storage
34 OSHA 1910.179 Overhead & Gantry Cranes
35 OSHA 1910.191 Compressed Gasses
36 OSHA 1910 Subpart-Z Toxic and Hazardous Substances
37 OSHA 1910.1030 Blood Borne Pathogens
38 OSHA 1910.23 Guarding floor and wall openings and holes
39
40 IS-BAO Standards International Standard for Business Aircraft Operations
CAMTS Standards 9th
41 Commission on Accreditation of Medical Transport Systems
Edition

42 NEMSPA Heliport Guide National EMS Pilots Association


43 AMJ "Air Medical Journal" Articles
“Delay in ED Arrival Resulting from a Remote Helipad at a Trauma Center”/ By; Brooke Lerner,
44
October-December 2000 issue.
“Hospital Helipads and the Emergency Medical Treatment and Active Labor Act” / By Steven S
45
Andrews, MD, May-June 2005 issue.
“For Emergency Medical Service Helicopter Plots, All Wind Is Local” By Bruce R. Robinson & David
46
Johnson, September-October 2009.

www.heliexp.com ©2013 All Rights Reserved HeliExperts International LLC

You might also like