You are on page 1of 5

UNIVERSIDAD NACIONAL ABIERTA Y A DISTANCIA UNAD

ESCUELA DE CIENCIAS DE LA EDUCACION ECEDU

CURSO: INTERMEDIATE ENGLISH I

UNIT 1: STEP 2 - TO DEVELOP THE CASE STUDY 1

INTEGRANTES:
JEISON JIMENEZ ARIAS
JUAN DAVID LOZANO
YENIFER BENAVIDES

ZULY MARCELA SUAREZ

TUTOR (A):
Juan Carlos López
551011_12

29 September 2018
Participation of individual activities

YENIFER BENAVIDES

Characters Facts Problem solution Alternative solution

Marcos is a boy  Technology Marcos lived in a zone rural I think, the learning is very important in
that her process  Motivation where the teaching-learning every place where this is develop and the
of learning in and developed depended of children have opportunity of learn and
English in her preparation of materials that school had in better their capacities for formation.
population went teacher with the place and little
I consider that a good motivation and to
very basic. respect to knowledge’s of teacher. He
know the necessity, knowledges of student,
English. changes the place of residence
He lived in also as a good interaction and participation
another place the  Lack of to the city, the education
where all have the same opportunities
preparation of model that many schools have
model of teaching would improve learning of Marcos and the
didactics for that a student learn a
that teacher use is support of their partners would help in the
tools and second language of form
different because process of learning.
integration of correct and opportune is
in a city students
knowledge’s. different.
have many
opportunities of a  To know the Also he doesn’t have a good
teaching more advantages preparation and use of ICT
develop with and because in the zones the
many models and desvantages communication is
focus for every that students complicated and is this factor
age, level, grade have with do that many children stop in
and necessities of respect the their process of learning of
every student. learning of English and difficult the
second idiom. develop of skills itself .

JUAN DAVID LOZANO


Marcos a new He has just arrived a He could feel embarrassed to He should make a friend to learn from
student of new city and school. know less than the other kids. him/her. And also ask the teacher to give
Leandro him some information about what they
Pemberty learned
The teacher He Has a better The teacher has a different The must take in count this little problem,
English level way to teach English so he must go over some old topic in order
to reinforce all the information.
Marcos´ They know a little bit They show a better average of They should understand Marcos had a
classmates more than Marcos English. different way to learn, and now they have
a new friend to keep learning things in
English.

JEISON JIMENEZ ARIAS

Meeting with School transfer It comes from the rural sector Make a diagnosis to identify weaknesses
Marcos where the training is unitary and strengths of the student and thus seek
and the teacher works all the the correct learning strategies
areas therefore explains the
basics in each area

After the Marcos presents an The student has a good level


 Repeat: repetition techniques. The
diagnosis of pre- average level of of written comprehension and
first is to say certain information
knowledge writing but low can produce text, but oral
over and over again; the second is to
reading comprehension and
imitate the way an English native
production is very low
expresses something.
 Practice formally with sounds:

Practicing the sounds of the tongue in


different ways allows oral production to
be improved.
 Recognize and use formulas and
routines
Recognize the different formulas to greet,
and to be aware of its use

ZULY MARCELA SUAREZ

 Reinforcement classes on topics


He did not have an Because in his previous seen.
Little education  Initiation of the process and topics
English teacher at his school they did not have a
in english to be learned
school teacher in this area (English)
because of this, Marcos does  Language practice
not have much knowledge
and relationship with the
language

 Intensive practice in dialogues to


Marcos, because he has not improve fluency
had enough English classes,  Writing practice
does not have the familiarity  reading practice
Average of his The average of them  In addition, studying and
of the English language, but
classmates is higher than Marcos. practicing this language in a
his classmates have a better
level and therefore a better group with your classmates is a
understanding. good alternative to achieve the
average as well as your
classmates.

Summary.
we think that Marco's parents should help foster the study of his son, especially in the area
of the English language, since as is well known is the area in which he stands out the least,
to evaluate his process, a series of activities will be carried out in which it is included:

• Speech activities, for example: dialogues, songs.


• Listening activities, for example: audios.
• Writing activities: for example: text production.

We consider that is very important value the progress of learning that Marcos acquires in the
new school because is very important to know how and what objectives he can overtake in
the present and future and as the knowledge's will be every day the betters.

the best way to assess a students who is having problems in this specific learning process, I
take in count four skills, those are speaking, writing, Reading and listening, because we need
to know how is the students going, and also it is something necessary to put in practice, we
always must practice these skills, and after we see the outcome of a assessment, we can decide
about taking more practice in some of those skills, we always need to take in count gramar
to have a good level in english.
Family is very important in this process, a student needs to feel that support from his/her
parents, we must let parents know that they are something that they can´t forget, its like a key
to open another door, a kid needs love and support from a father and a mother, even when
they don´t understand so well some topics, it´s to keep supporting that kid to keep his head
up, and teach him that he can never give up at studying.

Final group conclusions

The pedagogical use guides the work of institutions, teachers, students and parents. Hence the

importance of seeing it as a tool to enhance the learning and processes that occur in the classroom,

within the quality cycle that seeks to strengthen educational institutions and combines basic standards

of competence, evaluation processes and design and implementation of training plans. institutional

improvement, so that we can work hand in hand with the students, look for learning strategies so that

the students feel in harmony, tranquility and with the desire to acquire new knowledge such as

English, the flexibility and methodology of the teacher is very fundamental in teaching time.

The participation and collaboration between the educational center and the families is effective and

effective, both agents must know or have access to the information in both directions, bidirectional. In

this regard, we refer to parents and teachers listening to each other and agreeing what to do after

exchanging information and points of view. This implies changing the type of relationship so

frequent: teachers "recommend" and families obey or ignore.

The Quality Education that we dream and that we intend for our children, is built with the

PARTICIPATION of the whole Educational Community and it is the responsibility of the schools to

involve the families of their educational centers. The educational entities and families must coordinate

with the objective of improving the actions we develop, committing ourselves to offer proposals for

improvement in the education of our children / students.

You might also like