You are on page 1of 55

Green

 Product  Design  &  Manufacturing  


Dave  Dornfeld,  Cindy  Bayley,  Nancy  Diaz,    
Jennifer  Mangold,  Margot  Hutchins  
University  of  California,  Berkeley  –  April  2,  2013  

Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  FaciliKes  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  of  Products  and  Processes  
■  Summary  

Slide  1    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
LMAS  (“Who  we  are”)  
Research  in  the  LMAS  is  concerned  with  the  analysis    
and  improvement  of  manufacturing  processes,  systems  and  
enterprises  and  the  development  of  tools  to  analyze  their  su
stainability.    
 
Research  is  focused  on:    
-­‐   metrics  and  analy.cal  tools  for  assessing  the  
impact  of  processes,  systems  and  enterprises    
-­‐   modeling  sustainable,  environmentally-­‐  
       conscious  manufacturing  processes  and    
       systems  
-­‐   green  supply  chains  
-­‐   manufacturing  technology  for  reduced  impact  
-­‐   manufacturing  technology  for  producing    
advanced  energy  sources  or  storage  
-­‐   cleantech  
-­‐   sustainable  products  and  systems  

Specific  projects  include:  


-­‐  design  for  sustainability  
-­‐   green  machine  tools  
-­‐   sustainable  packaging  
-­‐   impact  and  life  cycle  assessment  tools  for    
manufacturing  (including  embedded  energy,    
materials,  water,  consumables)  
-­‐ metrics  for  assessing  green  technology  ROI    
(e.g.  GHG  ROI,  Energy  payback  Kme,  etc.)  
h_p://lmas.berkeley.edu   -­‐   risk  assessment  for  energy  and  resource  use  
-­‐   social  impacts  and  sustainability  
Blog:  h_p://green-­‐manufacturing.blogspot.com/   -­‐   enterprise  carbon  accounKng  

Slide  2    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Product  Life  Cycle  –  Mfg  Focus  
All  phases  are  important  and    
impact  manufacturing!  

Manufacturing

Slide  3    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Research  Topics  in  Sustainable  Mfg  

     Environment        Mfg      Sustainability    Scalability      Reliability      


Mfg  
                         Tech   Environment   Tech   Sustainability   Scalability   Reliability  
 
Design  
 
ProducKon    
     (high  producKon)  
 
OperaKon  
     (systems/supply  chain)  
 
Monitoring  
     (performance,  opKmize)  
 
Re-­‐Use/End  of  Life  

Slide  4    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Scope  of  Analysis  
Enterprise  

And  across  the  supply  chain…  

Factory/Facility  

Machining  Cell  or  Line  

Machine  Tool  

Machining  Process  

Tool-­‐chip  interface  
www.remmele.com/flash/contractManu/pca.html  
www.caranddriver.com/features/7207/virtual-­‐tour-­‐  of-­‐vws-­‐transparent-­‐factory.html  

Slide  5    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  FaciliKes  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  and  Wrap-­‐up  
■  Summary  

Slide  6    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
LMAS  Research  
NIST  
Mfg  Standard  Metrics   Samsung  
DfM/MfD   EducaKon  
Caterpillar   Partners  
Mori  Seiki/DTL   Mfg  Energy  OpKmizaKon   Mori  Seiki/DTL  
 
CGDM/ERG  
Green  Machine  Tools   Green  Machine  Tools   BERC  
CET/MOT  
LUCE  
Sustainability     CFI  
ConsorKum  
KAUST   Cleanability  
Applica2ons  

Solar/Rare  earth’s   Product  Labeling/  


Electronics   Daimler   SPS  
Kimberly  Clark/Waste  Mgmt  
Sustainable  Packaging  
Precision     SPS  
Manufacturing   Kimberly  Clark/Waste  Mgmt   Autodesk  
KITECH   Sustainable  Packaging   Sojware  for  green  process,   NGO’s/Gov’t  
systems  and  faciliKes  
MIRAI  
NCDMM  
Energy  suppliers  
Energy  suppliers   NSF-­‐SINAM   AMT  
 
Diamler/AFCC   Diamler/AFCC  
Nano-­‐X   LBNL

Autodesk   Mfg  Industry   Partners  


LBNL/JCAP   Sojware  for  green  process,   LBNL/JCAP   AMAT   CET/MOT  
ArKficial  photosynthesis   systems  and  faciliKes   ArKficial  photosynthesis   Mori  Seiki,  Daimler  
SPC  
LUCE  
CFI  

Mfg  technologies   AnalyKcal/assessment   Mfg  “systems”   Clean  tech   Business  drivers  


Micromachining   Metrics   Scaleup   cleanability  
“green  tech”  
CMP  
Sensors  
LCA,  EnVs  
Footprint  
Planning/org  
opKmizaKon  
CMP  consumable  
Green  machine  tools   Business  models  

Tools  

Slide  7    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
EducaKon  
■  ~20  Graduate  Student  Researchers  (MS,  PhD,  Postdocs,  Visitors)  
■  Courses:  
■  Professional  MEng  on  Sustainable  Manufacturing  
■  E290I  Sustainable  Manufacturing  (Dornfeld/Hutchins)  
■  Engineering  and  Business  for  Sustainability  (EBS)  
I Tools and Methods
II. Products, Processes and Services
III. Management, Strategy, Economics and Risk
IV. Policy and Systems

h_p://sustainable-­‐engineering.berkeley.edu/  

h_p://www.miraiinsKtute.org/  
h_p://cgdm.berkeley.edu/  

Slide  8    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Sustainable  Manufacturing  Partnership  (SMP)  
SMP - A collaboration among leading companies and LMAS
to research, develop, evaluate and implement
sustainable manufacturing solutions

The  basic  objecKve  of  the  SMP  is  …  


 
 …  to  provide  a  mechanism  for  the  transi'on  of  basic  research  on  green  &    
sustainable  manufacturing  to  industry  and  government  and  to  find  manufacturing    
soluKons  to  enable  a  sustainable  future  with  verifiable  economic  benefits.    
 
The  SMP  is  designed  to  be  "industry  driven"  in  the  sense  that  the  parKcipaKon  
of  industry  in  the  idenKficaKon  of  specific  research  objecKves  and  applicaKons  for    
evaluaKon  of  results  of  research  will  be  aggressively  sought.    
 
Industry  sponsorship  of  the  SMP  is  sought  although  there  are  many  addiKonal    
opportuniKes  for  federal  agency  funding  of  basic  research  in  this  area  or  focused    
applicaKon  research.  However,  the  quality  and  usefulness  of  the  research  and  the    
potenKal  for  program  support  are  dependent  on  the  ability  to  link  effecKvely  with  industry.      

Contact:  Professor  David  Dornfeld,  Director,  LMAS  


Will  C.  Hall  Family  Professor  of  Engineering,  Department  of  Mechanical  Engineering  
University  of  California,  Berkeley  CA  94720-­‐1740  
Ph:  (510)  642-­‐0906        E-­‐mail:  dornfeld@berkeley.edu      Blog:  h_p://green-­‐manufacturing.blogspot.com/  

Slide  9    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  FaciliKes  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  of  Products  and  Processes  
■  Summary  

Slide  10    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Life  Cycle  Assessment  (LCA)  
■  A  concept  or  methodology  to  evaluate  the  environmental  
effects  of  a  product  or  acKvity  holisKcally,  by  analyzing  
the  whole  life  cycle  of  a  parKcular  product,  process,  or  
acKvity  (U.S.  EPA,  1993)  

■  LCA  studies  analyze  the  environmental  aspects  and  


potenKal  impacts  throughout  a  product’s  life  cycle  (e.g.  
cradle-­‐to-­‐grave)  from  raw  material  acquisiKon  through  
producKon,  use,  and  disposal  (ISO).  

Adapted  from  A.  Horvath,  CE  268E  Lecture  9/16/10  

Slide  11    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Product  Life  Cycle  
Conven2onal  Product  Design  Sand  Slide  

Design  /  
Prototype  
Materials  
Typical  Focus  
Manufacturing  

Use  

End-­‐of-­‐Life  

■  ConvenKonal  thinking:  linear  process,  no  looking  back  (i.e.  uni-­‐direcKonal)  


■  Typical  objecKves:  Minimize  direct  cost,  meet  performance  and  safety  
requirements  
■  May  involve  elementary  environmental  regulaKons:  lead  free,  mercury  free,  etc.  
Source:  h_p://www.etech.com.cn  

Slide  12    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Product  Life  Cycle  
Holis2c  Product  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Cradle-­‐to-­‐Cradle  
Start-­‐of-­‐Life   ■  All  stages  embodies  design  
Materials  
■  All  stages  factor  in  supply  chain  
■  ObjecKves:  
Recycle   Supply   Mfg.  
■  Total  cost  of  ownership  
■  Carbon  emissions  
Design   ■  Resources:  energy,  water  
■  Waste  
Re-­‐mfg.   Chain   Use  

Re-­‐use  
End-­‐of-­‐Life  

Slide  13    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Tools  
■  GaBi  Sojware  
■  SimaPro  
■  Umberto  
■  CES  Selector    
■  Sustainable  Minds  
■  EIO-­‐LCA  
■  Autodesk  
■  Solidworks  Sustainability  

Slide  14    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Tools  Ex.  –  CES  Selector  
■  Advance  material  selector  sojware    
for  opKmizing  material  performance,    
cost  and  eco-­‐design  
 
■  Ashby  charts  
■  Graphical  trade-­‐off  comparisons    
in  material  properKes  
 

Slide  15    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Tools  –  SW  Sustainability  

Source:  solidworks.com  

Slide  16    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Case  Study  -­‐  Electronics  
■  LCA  of  the  Mobile  CommunicaKon  System  UMTS  Report  

■  Examining  the  environmental  impact  of  mobile  phones,  looking  


at  the  enKre  mobile  phones  infrastructure.  
■  What  causes  the  largest  environmental  impact  in  the  mobile  
phone  system?  
■  The  mobile  phone  makes  up  50%  of  the  impact  
■  Of  the  phone’s  impact,  95%  is  caused  by  manufacturing  and  5%  by  
usage.    

Source:  Emmenegger,  M  F  et  al.  “Life  Cycle  Assessment  of  the  Mobile  CommunicaKon  System  UMTS:  Towards  Eco-­‐efficient  
Systems  (12  pp).”  InternaKonal  Journal  Of  Life  Cycle  Assessment  11.4  (2006)  :  265-­‐276.  

Slide  17    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Case  Study  -­‐  Electronics  
■  Eco  Indicator  ‘99  results  per  life  cycle  stages  

Source:  Emmenegger,  M  F  et  al.    

Slide  18    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Case  Study  -­‐  Electronics  
■  Considering  manufacturing:  

■  The  producKon  of  printed  wiring  boards  (PWB)  and  integrated  


circuits  (IC)  make  up  about  40  –  50%  of  the  environmental  
impacts    
■  energy  consumpKon,  producKon  of  semiconductor  dies,  supply  of  
gold  and  silver  are  of  importance  in  the  assessment  
 
■  Conclusions:  
■  More  sustainable  pracKces  and  improvements  in  producKon  
■  Increasing  service  life    

Slide  19    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  Facili2es  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  of  Products  and  Processes  
■  Summary  

Slide  20    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
IntroducKon  
Enterprise  
•  Environmental  concerns  are  growing  
–  Customer  demand  
–  Increasing  regulaKon  
–  Increasing  costs  
•  Manufacturing  is  resource  intensive  
–  31%  of  U.S.  energy  usage1  
–  19%  of  total  world  GWP  emissions2  

Where  is  this  energy  going?  

[1]  US  EIA,  “Annual  Energy  Review  2008,  Report  No.  DOE/EIA-­‐0384(2008)”   Process/detail  
[2]  T.  Herzog,  “World  greenhouse  gas  emissions  in  2005,”  WRI  

Slide  21    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Energy  ConsumpKon  of  U.S.  Manufacturing  Sectors  
Energy Consumed as Fuel
120% 1.49  x  108  GJ   9.27  x  107  GJ  
1.14% 0.70% 0.54% 0.42% 0.09%
1.30% 0.56% 0.46% 0.38% 0.02%
2.54% 0.90%
Sum of the Percentage of Energy

100%
2.15%
3.06% 2.84%
7.06%
80% 7.58%
11.14%

60% 15.04%
   
20.41%

40%
21.69%
20%

0%
)

AL 2)

1)

AN ET 1)

ST AL 1)
2)

LS 3)

3)

AB 4)

PR ET 12)

)
IS 14)

AP RN 9)

)
H 324

PE 25

EQ 327

FA OO 36

TE MA 326

TE -E 335

23

AT AR 337

-E 315

16
TR -M (31
2
FO (33

-R (33

EL (31

FU (33
(3

(3

(3

(3

(3

(3

(3

(3
(

(
ER L (
D
AL

P
EM

PM R

XT CH

BE EC

XT TC

TC
E
O

O
ET

PL ET
O

IL

M
V-
C

-
PA

M
S-
C

-P
W

T
EC
M
N

P
P-
T-

N
-
O

B-
PE

EL

H
N

O
C

LE
Data:  U.S.  EIA  MECS  (2009)  “2006  Energy  ConsumpKon  as  Fuel”  

Slide  22    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Facility  Energy  ConsumpKon  

200 184 Machines


Avg. Energy Intensity [kWh/m2-yr]

180 177
180 171 172
HVAC
160 Lighting
140 130
120
100 92 89
80 73   67 68 73
60
60 54
37
40 34
24 25
20
0
Fabricated Metal Machinery Computer and Electrical Equip., Transportation Furniture and
Products Electronic Appliances, and Equipment Related Products
Products Components

NAICS Industry

Data:  U.S.  EIA  MECS  (2009)  “2006  Energy  ConsumpKon  as  Fuel”  

Slide  23    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Energy  Intensity  of  Computers  and  Electronics  

Computer"&"peripheral"equipment" Value"of"Product"Shipments"
Value"Added"
Communica8ons"equipment"
 
Naviga8onal,"measuring,"medical,"&"control"instruments"

Audio"&"video"equipment"

Electrical"equipment"

Electric"ligh8ng"equipment"

Household"appliance"

Semiconductor"&"other"electronic"component"
 
Other"electrical"equipment"&"component"

 
Mfg"&"reproducing"magne8c"&"op8cal"media"

0" 0.1" 0.2" 0.3" 0.4" 0.5"


Energy'Intensity'[kWh/$]'

Data:  U.S.  EIA  MECS  (2009)  “2006  Energy  ConsumpKon  as  Fuel”  

Slide  24    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Facility  Energy  ConsumpKon  
600
Machines

HVAC
Energy Intensity [kWh/m2-yr]

500 482
Lighting

400

301
300

188
 
200 180 184 177 171 172
116
130
103
100 92 89
61 63 37   60
73 67
54
68 73
36 34 25
19 24
0
Mori Seiki Mori Seiki Mori Seiki FAB-METAL MACH (333) COMP-ELEC ELEC-ETC TRANS-EQP FURN (337)
Plant 1 Plant 2 Plant 4 (332) (334) (335) (336)

Data:  U.S.  EIA  MECS  (2009)  “2006  Energy  ConsumpKon  as  Fuel”  

Slide  25    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
HVAC  Energy  Model  
§  Influencing  Factors:  
§  Outside  temperature  
§  ProducKon  equipment  
§  Manual  labor  &  body  heat  
§  ProducKon  Volume  
§  Slightly  posiKve  trend  

§  RecommendaKons:   HVAC Energy Model

§  Stabilize  the  loads  on  the  


#1 Machining HVAC Energy Data

110

machine  tools  during  the  day   100

§  Minimize  passage  through  doors  


90

HVAC Energy [MWh]


80

leading  outside  of  the  plant   70

60

§  Energy  Model:   50

40

EHVAC  =  a+b*V+c*t+d*t2   30
200
220 240
15
20
25

260 10
280 5
Avg. Temperature [C]
Volume [units]

Slide  26    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley/
26  
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
LocaKon  Dependency  of  HVAC  Energy  
12,000
Plant 1
9,837 Plant 4
10,000
HVAC Energy [MWh/yr]

7,969
8,000 7,427

6,114
5,828 5,625 5,559
6,000

4,000 3,604

2,000 1,411
1,024 1,152
796 806 777 879
545
0
Iga* Iga San Jose Detroit Munich Shanghai Chennai New Delhi
(Japan) (Japan) (USA) (USA) (Germany) (China) (India) (India)

*Actual  HVAC  energy  consumpKon  for  two  plants  in  Iga,  Japan  

Slide  27    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley/
27  
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Thank  you  for  your  a_enKon!  

 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Contact  InformaKon:  
Nancy  Diaz  (ndiaz@berkeley.edu)  
Ph.D.  Candidate  
Laboratory  for  Manufacturing  and  Sustainability  (LMAS)  
University  of  California,  Berkeley  

Slide  28    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  FaciliKes  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  of  Products  and  Processes  
■  Summary  

Slide  29    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Product  Life  Cycle  
Raw  Material   Material  
Manufacturing   Use   End-­‐of-­‐Life  
ExtracKon   Processing  

Informal    
Reuse   Reuse   Resell  

Formal   Secondary  
Use   Refurbish  
CollecKon   Processing  

Recycling   IncineraKon  

Curbside  
Landfill  
CollecKon  

Slide  30    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
E-­‐Waste  
 E-­‐waste  is  a  generic  
term  encompassing  
Consumer  Electronic  Product  
various  forms  of  electric  
Sales  in  the  U.S   and  electronic  
equipment  that  have  
ceased  to  be  of  any  
value  to  their  owners  
(Widmer  2005)  

Source:  EPA  May  2007  

Slide  31    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Informal  Recycling  

Resource  Efficiency  

LegislaKon  

Slide  32    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
Image  Sources:  StEP-­‐EMPA,  ERI,  ETBC   /
   
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
“BeLer  processing  of  e-­‐waste  would  not  only  reduce  the  
amount  of  poten.ally  toxic  waste  sent  to  landfill  or  
illegally  exported  overseas,  but  lead  to  greater  recovery  
of  valuable  raw  materials”    –  European  Parliament  

Before  we  can  improve  e-­‐waste  processing  we  need  to  


have  a  be_er  understanding  of  the  e-­‐waste  system  and  
potenKal  impacts    

Slide  33    
Berkeley
33  
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
CommunicaKng  Recycling  Efficiency  
EOL Pathways Project
How  do  we  accurately  represent  reuse,  recycling  and  final  disposal  of  
consumer  electronics  in  life  cycle  models?  

PlasKcs  

Metals  

PCBs  

Products  

Ideal  Inputs:   Outputs:  


•  Product  types   •  Amount/  %  material  types    
•  Source  locaKon   Data  collected  through  supplier  survey   •  Path  impact  calculaKon  
•  Transport  Distance  
Different  organizaKons,  different  
processes    
–  looking  for  assessment,  not  judgment  

Slide  34    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Flow  Analysis  of  E-­‐Waste  CollecKon  &  Processing    

System  Boundary  

Slide  35    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Scope  of  Material  Flow  Analysis  
Products    Collec2on   Facili2es   Pathway  
Televisions   Consumer   Type  of  Facility   Recycle  
LCD   Retail  Return   -­‐ Recycle  
Collec.on   -­‐ Refurbish   Reuse  
Plasma  
Program   -­‐ Reuse   Whole  System  
CRT  
  Direct     Component  
Computers   OEM  takeback   10  Facili2es   Refurbish  
Laptops       Whole  System  
Desktops   Business   Region   Component  
Tablet  PCs   OEM   United  States  
 

Mobile  Phones   Enterprise      


  Government   Temporal  
Printers   Schools/Univ.   2006  -­‐  2011  
 

%  Volume   Retail   Whole  System  


Facility  X  
Laptops   Returns   Refurbish  

Slide  36    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
QuanKtaKve  &  QualitaKve  Assessment  
Electricity  
Indirect  Energy  

Manual    
Equipment  1    

Disassembly/   Inventory    
SorKng    

Office  and  Admin  


Energy  Profile  
Equipment  2   Electricity    
Storage      
Equipment  3  

Develop  performance  profile  


Direct  Energy   —  IdenKfy  electricity  use  and  understand  how  it  relates  to  operaKons  
Compare  performance    
—  Compare  the  use  and  performance  data  of  similar  faciliKes  
Iden2fy  data  gaps  
 —  Determine  areas  where  more  informaKon  is  needed  

Slide  37    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Federal  Trade  Commission    

 Recyclable  -­‐    It  is  deceptive  to  misrepresent,  directly  or  by  implication,  that  a  product  or  package  
is  recyclable.  A  product  or  package  should  not  be  marketed  as  recyclable  unless  it  can  be  
collected,  separated  or  otherwise  recovered  from  the  solid  waste  stream  for  reuse,  or  in  
the  manufacture  or  assembly  of  another  package  or  product,  through  an  established  
recycling  program.  Unquali<ied  claims  of  recyclability  for  a  product  or  package  may  be  made  if  
A  product  or  package  should  not  be  marketed  as  recyclable  unless  it  can  
the  entire  product  or  package,  excluding  minor  incidental  components,  is  recyclable.  For  products  
be  collected,  separated  or  otherwise  recovered  from  the  solid  waste  
or  packages  that  are  made  of  both  recyclable  and  non-­‐recyclable  components,  the  recyclable  
stream   for  reuse,  or  in  the  manufacture  or  assembly  of  another  package  
claim  should  be  adequately  quali<ied  to  avoid  consumer  deception  about  which  portions  or  
components   or  op
f  troduct,  
he  product  tohrough  
r  package  aare  
n  reecyclable.  
stablished  Claims  roecycling   program.  
f  recyclability    
should  be  quali<ied  
to  the  extent  necessary  to  avoid  consumer  deception  about  any  limited  availability  of  recycling  
programs  and  collection  sites.  If  an  incidental  component  signi<icantly  limits  the  ability  to  recycle  
a  product  or  package,  a  claim  of  recyclability  would  be  deceptive.  A  product  or  package  that  is  
made  from  recyclable  material,  but,  because  of  its  shape,  size  or  some  other  attribute,  is  not  
accepted  in  recycling  programs  for  such  material,  should  not  be  marketed  as  recyclable.  

Slide  38    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Mass  Based  Recyclability  

%PRMC  =  Potential  Recyclable  Material  Content  (as  percent  of  total  weight)  

 
•  Provides  single  approach  for  theoreKcal  recyclability  calculaKon  
•  Develop  standard,  consistent  method  for  calculaKng  recyclability  
•  Consistent  with  other  product  level  recycling    criteria  reporKng  
–   (WEEE,  IEEE  1680.1,  IEC  Technical  Report)  

Slide  39    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
CommunicaKng  Recyclability:  Recyclability  Calculator  

•  Consistent  with  IEC  


Recyclability  
CalculaKon                    (IEC/
TR  62635)  
•  Next  Steps:  
•  Understand  
variety  in  PWBs  
•  Incorporate  
design  for  
recycling  
strategies  
   

Slide  40    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  FaciliKes  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  of  Products  and  Processes  
■  Summary  

Slide  41    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Sustainability  and  Manufacturing  
Environment  

Society  

Economy  

Manufacturing  

Slide  42    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
DefiniKon  –  Social  Responsibility  
■  Sustainability  requires  socially  responsible  products  
■  ISO  26000:  Responsibility  of  an  organizaKon  for  the  
impacts  of  its  decisions  and  acKviKes  on  society  and  the  
environment,  through  transparent  and  ethical  behavior  
that  
■  contributes  to  sustainable  development,  including  health  and  
the  welfare  of  society;  
■  takes  into  account  the  expectaKons  of  stakeholders;  
■  is  in  compliance  with  applicable  law  and  consistent  with  
internaKonal  norms  of  behavior;  and  
■  is  integrated  throughout  the  organizaKon  and  pracKced  in  its  
relaKonships  
InternaKonal  OrganizaKon  for  StandardizaKon,    “ISO  26000:  Guidance  on  Social  Responsibility,”  2010.  

Slide  43    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Contextualized  Supply  Chain  
Impacts  on  Social  En22es  

Global  Community  
ActualizaKon   Local  
Local   Community  
Esteem   Community  
Local  
AffiliaKon   Community  

Basic  Health   Local  


and  Safety   Community  

Slide  44    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Social  Impacts  of  Industrial  Processes  

Photo  credit:    Reuters  

Photo  credit:    h_p://www.enoughproject.org   Photo  credit:    Lionel  Healing/AFP/Ge_y  Images  

Slide  45    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
The  Sustainability  ConsorKum  Approach  

Sustainability  
Risk  

Key  
Performance  
Indicator  

Improvement  
Opportunity  

Slide  46    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Social  Impacts  -­‐  Challenges  
■  IdenKficaKon  -­‐  Tier  1    
■  No  consensus  on  the  risks  (or  indicators  to  measure  risk)  
■  Opacity  of  supply  chain  
■  Risks  need  to  be  prioriKzed  

■  CorrecKve  AcKon  -­‐  Tier  1    


■  Linkage  between  acKon  and  impact  not  well  characterized  
■  Needs  to  provide  guidance  without  being  overly  prescripKve  

■  IdenKficaKon  -­‐  Tier  2  


■  Many  risks  evaluated  at  organizaKonal    
         or  naKonal  level  
■  Limited  methodologies  to  allocate  impact  to    
         products  

Slide  47    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Sustainability  Risks  –  What  are  they?  
■  Human  and  Labour  Rights  
■  Universal  DeclaraKon  of  Human  Rights  (UN)  
■  InternaKonal  Labour  OrganizaKon  convenKons  

■  Programs  focused  on  social  impacts  


■  ISO  26000:    Guidance  on  Social  Responsibility  
■  SA  8000:    auditable  cerKficaKon  standard    

■  Programs  integraKng  social  and  environmental  impacts  


■  Global  ReporKng  IniKaKve  (GRI)  
■  Global  Social  Compliance  Program  (GSCP)  
■  Sustainability  AccounKng  Standards  Board  (SASB)  
■  Good  Guide  (now  partnered  with  Underwriter’s  Laboratory)  
■  The  Sustainability  ConsorKum  (TSC)  

Slide  48    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Sustainability  Risks  –  Where  are  they?  

■  Where  …  
■  In  the  world  
■  In  the  supply  chain  
■  In  the  organizaKon  
■  Tools  
■  Audit  results  
■  Social  Hotspot  Database  
■  Input/Output  LCA  
■  LocaKon-­‐specific  data  
Sourcemap,  Typical  Laptop  Computer  accessed  7/18/12  from  h_p://srce.mp/nBnBZV  

Slide  49    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
PrioriKzing  Social  Impacts  in  Design  
Furthest    
Up-­‐stream  
Supplier  
Effects  of    

Lifecycle  phase  
mat’l  choice  in   Training  for  those  involved  in  raw  
manufacturing   mat’l  extracKon  and  processing  

Informal  
recycling  
Providing    connecKvity  to  people  
for  enhanced  product  exchange  
End  of  Life   and  health  care  
Gravity  of  Impact  
Most  egregious  -­‐  affecKng   Opportunity  for    
basic  rights  and  health   posiKve  impact      

Slide  50    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Current  and  near-­‐term  work  
■  OperaKonalize  definiKons  of  social  impacts/risks  
■  Collaborate  with  other  disciplines  
■  (Green)  Materials  &  Chemistry  
■  Public  health  
■  Materials  science  (extracKon  and  processing  of  materials)  
■  Business  
■  EducaKonal  assessment  

■  Facilitate  improved  decision  making  in  design  


■  Key  performance  indicators  
■  IncorporaKon  into  exisKng  and  new  tools  
■  Mechanism  for  trade-­‐off  analysis  

Slide  51    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Outline  

■  MoKvaKon  and  Background  


■  Lab  Overview  
■  Specific  Research  Topics  
■  Life  Cycle  Design  
■  Sustainable  Processes  and  FaciliKes  
■  End  of  Life  Strategies  for  Electronics  
■  Social  Impacts  of  Products  and  Processes  
■  Summary  

Slide  52    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
Summary  
■  Manufacturing  plays  an  important  role  in  the  
sustainability  of  the  product  life  cycle  
■  Truly  green,  sustainable  products  require  that  designers  
and  manufacturers:  
■  Consider  the  enKre  life  cycle  during  design  
■  Assess  environmental  impacts  at  all  levels  of  manufacturing  
enterprise  and  across  the  supply  chain  
■  Implement  appropriate  end-­‐of-­‐life  strategies  
■  Address  the  social  impacts  of  our  manufacturing  systems  and  the  
products  that  they  create  

Slide  53    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA
More  informaKon…  

h_p://lmas.berkeley.edu  
Blog:  h_p://green-­‐manufacturing.blogspot.com/  

Slide  54    
©  LMAS  2013   Berkeley
/
UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA

You might also like