Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Hattie Burford
Algebra is the study of different methods for solving equations in which letters and
general symbols are used to represent numbers, quantities, and formulae. According to the
Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (PSSM) (2000), the Algebra Standard
mathematical relationships, and the analysis of change. On the other hand, the Common Core
Mathematics Standards do not have Algebra as a single standard, but instead have it paired as
“Operations and Algebraic Thinking”. Lastly, the Nebraska Math Standards believes that the
Algebra content will communicate algebraic concepts using multiple representations to reason,
solve problems, and make connections within mathematics and across disciplines. These three
different sources for mathematics standards share many differences and similarities in the
According to the Principles and Standards for School Mathematics (2000), by viewing
algebra as a strand in the curriculum starting in prekindergarten, students will learn, understand,
and prepare for more-sophisticated work with numbers, symbols, and algebraic expressions in
the middle school and high school curriculums. PSSM describes understanding patterns
relations, and functions as natural and interesting for young children. By the end of 5th grade
PSSM state that students should begin to use variables and algebraic expressions as they describe
and extend patterns. Representing and analyzing mathematical situations and structures using
algebraic symbols is to develop gradually from preschool to high school. Young children are to
operations, and develop the understanding of a variable as a placeholder for a specific number.
something”, and will develop the symbol of equivalence later on. Also, the PSSM believes that
elementary students should use objects, pictures, and symbols to model situations that involve
the addition and subtraction of whole numbers. Furthermore, students should use these models to
functions and to understanding many ideas presented in the news”. In order to develop this
concept, students learn to first describe qualitative change, followed by quantitative change.
The Common Core State Standards begins its content of Operations and Algebraic
addition and putting together and adding to, and understanding subtraction as taking apart and
taking from. Common Core State Standards also recognizes the importance of using objects,
pictures, and symbols to model situations. For example, in the standards for grade 1, students
will use objects, drawings, and equations with a symbol for the unknown number to represent the
problem. Equivalence is another shared concept between Common Core and PSSM, working
with equal groups of objects to gain foundations for multiplication in Grade 2. Lastly, generating
and analyzing patterns and relationships is another common concept that is learned in the 4th and
5th grades of Common Core, and fundamental to PSSM. Experience with performing operations,
understanding the meaning of the equal sign, becoming familiar with performing and writing
The Comparison and Applications of Algebra Standards Through Grades K-12 4
equations, identifying patterns, and using symbols in expressions are all concepts that were
found in both the Common Core Standards and PSSM. However, there were a few differences
between the two recognized in grades K-5. For example, there is a strong emphasis in Grade 4
with word problems and their applications such as solving multistep word problems posed with
whole numbers and having whole-number answers using the four operations, multiplying and
dividing to solve word problems, and representing verbal statements with equations. Though the
PSSM may also value these ideas, Common Core delivers specific standards in which these areas
should be met.
Unlike the Common Core Standards and PSSM, the Nebraska State Standards begin at
grade level 3. Upon the first comparison of these three sources, the Nebraska State Standards
appeared to be much more in depth, with more examples, pictures, and deeper clarification than
the other two sources. For example, the Nebraska State Standards include an “extended
indicator” that offers access or entry points to the grade-level standards. Nonetheless, there are
several standards in grade 3 that are similar to those of the Common Core standards and PSSM.
For example, recognizing patterns, creating and using models to represent mathematical
situations, and identifying and applying properties of whole numbers while adding and
subtracting. In grade 4, the Nebraska State Standards also apply properties of whole numbers to
solve equations, but a greater emphasis was found on using symbols to compare quantities.
Furthermore, Nebraska State Standards expects students at this level to be able to select
appropriate operation and relational symbols to make a number sentence true. Though this is
similar to standards in Common Core, there are standards clarifications that help teachers view
The Comparison and Applications of Algebra Standards Through Grades K-12 5
examples of how these standards can be met, and appropriate teacher notes for teachers to
reference. Lastly, Nebraska State Standards also emphasizes modeling in context in grade 5,
where students create, use, and compare models representing mathematical situations. However,
these standards also emphasize the use of tables and graphs, which were not notably emphasized
According to the PSSM, once the algebraic foundation is built, more-sophisticated work
can be done in the middle and high school grades. The PSSM believes that in grades 6-8 there is
a significant emphasis on algebra, along with geometric concepts, while in grades 9-12, the
standards are extended to data analysis and statistics as well. Understanding patterns, relations,
and functions are all concepts that grades 6-12 build on. By the end of secondary school, students
should be comfortable using the notation of function to describe relationships. In the middle
grades students begin by learning about linear functions, before extending their knowledge to
function classifications and more complex functions. Representing and analyzing mathematical
situations and structures using algebraic symbols is developed gradually. Middle school students
should be able to understand how the diagram relates to the equation, and high school students
should be able to represent the relationship with symbols. Furthermore, variables and equality
are two more concepts that are viewed as a notion at first, and then used in equations and
symbolic manipulation in the middle and high school grades. Modeling and representing the
understanding of quantitative relationships is where much of the content in the middle and high
school grades is focused. According to the PSSM, high school students should be able to develop
models by drawing on their knowledge, for instance, to decide whether a situation would best be
The Comparison and Applications of Algebra Standards Through Grades K-12 6
modeled by a linear function or a quadratic function. The students are also expected to draw
conclusions from the model. Lastly, the middle-school grades focus on linearity and the idea of
constant rate of change, preparing students for high school where they are to learn about classes
The Common Core Standards differ in grades 6-8 in that algebraic standards are now
presented as “expressions and equations” standards. Similar to that of PSSM, the standards in
grades 6-8 build upon the content that was emphasized in grades K-5. For example, applying and
understanding previous arithmetic and algebraic expressions, and representing and analyzing
quantitative relationships using dependent and independent variables. The Common Core also
highlights the importance of the connections between proportional relationships, lines, and linear
equations. Students are to analyze and solve linear equations and pairs of simultaneous linear
equations. This agrees with the PSSM assumption that a strong background in functions and
linear functions is essential to move forward in high school. Interestingly, the Common Core
Standards adds another domain, functions, in grade 8, that is not seen in previous grades. This
domain addresses defining, evaluating, and comparing functions, along with using them to model
relationships between quantities. A difference noted from PSSM is that once the Common Core
Standards reach the high school grade levels, the domains algebra and functions are still
separated. However, the algebraic domain is similar to the PSSM in expressions evaluated at a
deeper level, equations created, reasoning with equations and inequalities, and using tools and
strategies to model mathematics. The difference between the two in grades 9-12 lies in the
function domain where the importance of interpreting and building functions is highlighted.
The Comparison and Applications of Algebra Standards Through Grades K-12 7
Furthermore, exponential models and trigonometric functions are addressed to prepare students
Beginning in grade 6, the Nebraska Math Standards addresses the importance of using
applying properties to solve equations, similar to those of the Common Core and PSSM. They
standard between all three is the application of properties to solve equations such as order of
operations. In the grade 8 standards, Nebraska emphasizes solving one step equations and
identifying values that make inequalities true, both of which are also mentioned in the PSSM and
Common Core. However, one difference noted is in grade 8, the standard to identify
representations of numbers squared, as a standard of its own. Interestingly, the Nebraska State
Math Standards does not specify standards by grade level after the eighth grade. Instead, the
standards jump to the twelfth grade, which encompasses the standards to be used for grades 9-12.
Nonetheless, similar to the Common Core Standards, functions are a large make-up of the
Nebraska Math Standards. Students are to interpret values of a function in a table, identify linear
relationships, and analyze the effect of rate of change. However, one difference in relation to
Common Core and PSSM, is that the Nebraska Math Standards highlights comparing linear and
non-linear segments and graphs as its own standard. The in-depth detail of standards is a
common observation that is consistent throughout much of the Nebraska State Math Standards,
grades K-12. This may have much to do with the reason why these standards jump from K-8 to
Conclusion
Though there are many differences in the standards between PSSM, Common Core Math
Standards, and Nebraska State Math Standards, the progression of standards from K-12 is very
similar. All three sources recognize the importance of a strong algebraic background to build on
in the middle-school grades, and explore even further in the high school grades. One major
difference was the progression was that the Nebraska State Math Standards did not begin in
kindergarten, but grade 3. Another major difference seen was also from the Nebraska State Math
Standards, where instead of listing standards in grades 9-12, they listed all of the standards as
one grade. Though Common Core and Nebraska Standards align similarly and address
comparable ideas, the Nebraska State Math Standards contains more in-depth information,
provides more examples, displays sample problems with pictures, graphs, etc. Clarifications,
teachers’ notes, and these visual examples are the primary differences in delivery.
Problem Solving
Problem solving is such an important area that I believe needs to be covered more
thoroughly and more often in students’ education. I would incorporate this in grades K-5 by first
introducing students to problem solving, and the different strategies that are used. I would have
the students learn a step –by-step process to help them determine the problem, create a plan, and
carry it out to find the solution. In grades 6-8, I would add another step to the process, and have
the students reflect on their strategy. In grades 9-12, the students should be able to solve
problems that arise by using past knowledge. I would then encourage them to think deeper, to
The Comparison and Applications of Algebra Standards Through Grades K-12 9
build on past knowledge to create new mathematical knowledge through their problem-solving
processes.
This is an area in which many students at the high school, or even college level, have not
had much experience with. I believe that this is a problem for students because even though they
may know how to reason, make conjectures, and prove concepts, they do not realize they are
doing it. In grades K-5, I would incorporate reasoning into math by having them not only make
conjectures using addition/subtraction, or patterns, but by explaining to them they just proved a
mathematical concept. In grades 6-8, the students will have been exposed to this idea, and can
dive further into what a conjecture is. Lastly, in grades 9-12, I would incorporate two column
proofs, along with inductive and deductive reasoning to show students that there are different
Communication
I feel that this process would be easier to incorporate in the early years of math education.
In grades K-5, students are eager to hear what their peers have to say, how they solved a
problem, and are open to communicate different ideas. I would start by teaching them how to
organize their thoughts, perform a think-pair-share technique to communicate with their peers,
and as a group, or pair, share their thoughts with their teacher and others. In the grades 6-12, I
believe these same strategies are important. I also would incorporate students working together
on a problem, or sharing their work on a problem. This allows the students to analyze and
Connections
contexts outside of mathematics into the real world is, in my opinion, one of the more difficult
processes to achieve. In order for students to make connection among mathematical ideas, they
need to have a strong foundation in math. In grades K-5 I would create these connections
whenever possible, and would create projects/problems in which they come up with these
connections on their own. In grades 6-12, it is important to present mathematical problems that
apply to contexts outside of mathematics. This will need to be incorporated even to students in
classes such as AP Statistics or AP Calculus, because these applications will become more
complex.
Representation
Early on in math education, I believe that it is important for students to learn how to
model and interpret mathematical concepts. In order for students to learn how to do this, they
must first be exposed to these representations. In grades K-5, I would incorporate representation
into lessons by provided as many visual aids as possible in order to help students see
representations of mathematical concepts. They can then be taught how to organize, record, and
communicate ideas through these representations. In grades 6-12, I would then ask students to
References
Principles and standards for school mathematics. (2008). Reston, VA: National Council of
Teachers of Mathematics.
http://www.corestandards.org/Math/
https://www.education.ne.gov/math/Math_Standards/Adopted_2015_Math_Standards/2015_Neb
raska_College_and_Career_Standards_for_Mathematics_Vertical.pdf