THE BLUE JOURNAL CLUB by the author available online.
PAPER FOR DISCUSSION
Comparison Are the outcomes of women who McCarthy E, Walker SP, Ugoni A, Written personalised weight gain were overweight different from targets only. those who were obese (see Lappas M, Leong O, Shub A. Self- .............................................. Figures S2 and S4)? weighing and simple dietary advice Outcomes .............................................. for overweight and obese pregnant How did the authors assess the Composite primary outcome including women to reduce obstetric impact of missing data (18%) in any of: gestational diabetes; pregnancy- complications without impact on this study (see Figure S3)? quality of life: a randomised induced hypertension and pre- .............................................. eclampsia; mode of birth other than controlled trial. BJOG 123:965–973. How does this RCT enhance your spontaneous vertex; postpartum practice, in view of the existing To view this article visit http:// haemorrhage; 3rd or 4th degree evidence (see suggested reading)? dx.doi.org/10.1111/1471-0528.13919. perineal tear; admission to adult intensive care/high-dependence units, SCENARIO maternal death. SUGGESTED READING .............................................. A nulliparous woman visits her Study design Critical Appraisal Skill Programme obstetrician at 13+0 weeks. Her body Randomised controlled trial (RCT; (CASP). CASP checklist for mass index (BMI) is 35 kg/m2, but she Trial registration number: Randomised Controlled Trials has no other medical history. Her ACTRN12611000881932). (http://www.casp-uk.net/). dating ultrasound scan was normal. .............................................. Thangaratinam S, Rogozinska Her obstetrician explained the risks of DISCUSSION POINTS E, Jolly K, Glinkowski S, Roseboom obesity on her pregnancy. T, Tomlinson JW, et al. Effects of She asks: ‘what can I do to minimise What are the risks of obesity in interventions in pregnancy on these risks?’. maternal weight and obstetric pregnancy for mothers and babies? .............................................. outcomes: meta-analysis of DESCRIPTION OF RESEARCH How would you manage the randomised evidence. BMJ woman in the scenario, compared 2012;344:e2088. with women with normal weight? .............................................. Participants .............................................. Brownfoot FC, Davey MA, Overweight or obese pregnant What are the strengths and Kornman L. Routine weighing to women at <20 weeks with a weaknesses of this RCT? reduce excessive antenatal weight singleton pregnancy, without pre- .............................................. gain: a randomised controlled trial. existing diabetes. How do the demographics of the BJOG 2016. .............................................. study participants compare with .............................................. Intervention those of women in your practice Sagedal LR, Øverby NC, Bere E, Simple dietary advice, written (see Table 1)? Torstveit MK, Lohne-Seiler H, personalised weight gain targets, .............................................. Sm astuen M, et al. Lifestyle encouragement of regular self- Analysis of covariance (ANCOVA) intervention to limit gestational weighing and discussions of weight was used to analyse the difference weight gain: the Norwegian Fit for gain with the obstetric care in gestational weight gain. What is Delivery randomised controlled provider. ANCOVA and was its use trial. BJOG 2016. .............................................. appropriate? ..............................................
#BlueJC to discuss a paper on These discussion points were written
social media on the last Wednesday of every by BJOG’s Journal Club Coordinator, month. Follow @BlueJCHost or visit Elaine Leung. For a list of all journal www.bluejc.org to stay updated. club papers and resources, scan the QR Email bjog@rcog.org.uk to host a #BlueJC code or visit www.bjog.org "
974 ª 2016 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists