Professional Documents
Culture Documents
___________________________________________________ ____________________
J Res Adv Dent 2014; 3:1:74-80.
1SeniorLecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
2SeniorLecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
3Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
4Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kalinga institute of Dental sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
5Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Darshan Dental College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
6Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
ABSTRACT
Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of hamular notch-incisive papilla plane as an anatomical landmark in
establishing occlusal plane in edentulous subjects.
Materials and Methods: Seventy subjects were selected from the South Indian population, of which fifty were
dentulous and twenty were edentulous. Dental stone casts were fabricated for dentulous and edentulous
subjects. Dental stone casts of the dentulous and edentulous subjects, along with occlusal rims were analysed
using three dimensional analysing machine. The angles between the occlusal planes and H.I.P plane were
determined using reference coordinate system based on characteristic points in the dentition on the cusp tips in
dentulous casts and on maxillary occlusal rim on edentulous casts.
Results: The HIP plane tends to be parallel to the occlusal plane. There is no statistical difference between sexes.
Conclusion: The HIP plane is parallel to the natural occlusal plane and also the HIP plane can be used as a
reference plane to re-establish the occlusal plane in edentulous patients.
Keywords: Anatomical landmarks, Occlusal plane, HIP plane, Three dimensional analysing machine.
_______________________________________________________________________________________
Copyright ©2013
are due to a large extent to the varying degrees of posterior teeth and incisal edges of anterior teeth
inclinations of natural teeth2,4,5,6. Anatomical and in edentulous situations, it is established using
landmarks that have been suggested to clinically ala-tragal and interpupillary reference planes.
help to determine the position of the occlusal plane
are the upper lip, corners of the mouth4, lateral MATERIALS AND METHOD
margins of the tongue7,8 buccinator grooves4, two-
Seventy subjects were chosen of which fifty
thirds of the height of the retromolar pad9,10,
were dentulous and twenty were edentulous
parallel to the Camper’s plane or ala-tragus
subjects. The dentulous group was subdivided into
line4,5,6,11-20, 3.3mm below the parotid papilla21 etc.
two groups as
Orientation of the occlusal plane is lost in
Group I: consisting of 30 dentulous subjects of age
patients rendered edentulous and should be
group 16-19 years, no attrition, of which 19 were
relocated if complete dentures are to be esthetic
men and 11 were women.
and functional. It is difficult to find optimal position
of occlusal plane in every edentulous patient using Group II: consisting of 20 dentulous subjects of 50-
the reported soft tissue landmarks22. Improper use 55 years age group with moderate to severe
of these landmarks may compromise the functional attritional patterns on the occlusal surfaces of the
and esthetic result of the intended prosthetic teeth and
rehabilitation23-26.
Group III: consisting of 20 completely edentulous
H.I.P. was reported in the literature to be subjects.
useful in establishing the occlusal plane. The H.I.P.
plane can be defined as a plane extending from the Dental stone casts of dentulous and the
hamular notches of the pterygoid hamulus to the edentulous subjects were fabricated. In the
incisive papilla. From these structures, the edentulous casts, the maxillary occlusal rims were
abbreviation H.I.P. plane was derived. This plane fabricated and the occlusal plane was clinically
remains unaltered even with loss of teeth, as established parallel to Camper’s line5,7,9,14,18,32 and
incisive papilla and hamular notches appeared to be mid line was marked on the anterior aspect of the
least affected by residual ridge resorption and occlusal rim.
remains visible27-30.
Standardization of the models
The hamular notch and incisive papilla
reference plane (HIP) has been recognized by Base former was used to establish the
Cooperman and Willard (1960) as representing a upper casts of all subjects. Prior to each
“transit line plane” to diagnostically relate the measurement, bases of the gypsum models were
maxillary arch to a horizontal reference table to corrected to parallel the granite platform of the
disclose the degree of diseased occlusion in the three-dimensional precise measuring device.The
natural dentition and in prostheses31. dental stone casts of the dentulous and edentulous
subjects were subjected to the three dimensional
Some authors have opined that angulation analysis machine for measuring required angles.
of the occlusal plane is generally related to skeletal
base of maxilla and that the occlusal plane tends to Surveying tools, Positions and Methods
be parallel to HIP plane (Rich, 1982)31. Herculus
This experiment utilized the accurate
C.Karkazis et al concurred with this view after a
three-dimensional precise measuring device [Fig.
cephalometric analysis of edentulous subjects30.
1]. The tip of the electron probe was 1 mm in
Rich31, Karkazis and Polyzois30observed the diameter with a liner accuracy of 0.003mm. All the
parallel relation between HIP plane and occlusal measured data were recorded and analysed with
plane. This study was designed to identify the the three-dimensional surveying software. In the
parallel relationship of the HIP plane and maxillary dentulous casts, the midpoint of the incisive papilla
occlusal plane. In dentulous situations, the defined and deepest points of the hamular notches were
occlusal plane passes through the cusp tips of the lightly touched by the electron probe of the three-
75
dimensional analysis machine, to determine the HIP
plane [fig. 1, 2].
76
ANOVA
hamular notches on the cast and transferred to the ANGLE2
occlusal rim on the right and left second molar Sum of
regions) on clinically established occlusal plane and Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 50.641 2 25.320 21.507 .000
HIP plane [fig. 4]. Within Groups 78.878 67 1.177
Total 129.519 69
RESULTS
One way ANOVA between the groups has statistically
The mean and standard deviation values significant difference with P value at 0.00 levels.
for the angles were measured from the occlusal
Line diagram 1: showing relationship between the angles of
planes to the hamular notch incisive papilla plane the three groups
for Group I, II and III subjects maxillary casts
(16yrs-19 yrs-dentulous) and Pearson’s correlation
test was done for individual groups.
d ANGLE 2
In GROUP I (16yrs-19yrs-dentulous), the e
mean values with standard deviation obtained for i g
angles I, II, III AND IV were(in degrees) 3.14˚±1.19, n r
2.67˚±1.15, 4.41˚±1.14 and 3.72˚±1.22 respectively, e GROUP1
from occlusal planes of I, II, III and IV to the HIP …
GROUP 2
plane. In the measured angles, Angle 2 is the least of
all, showing that occlusal plane II is nearest to the GROUP 3
HIP plane
The horizontal axis shows the Groups and
In GROUP II (50-55yrs-dentulous), the the vertical axis shows the means of the angles of
mean values and their standard deviations obtained three groups in degrees. The Group I has the highest
for angles I, II, III AND IV were(in degrees) mean value and the Group II has the smallest mean
1.25˚±0.92, 0.64˚±0.49,2.19˚±1.04and 1.69˚±0.92 value. The angle of the Group III tends to be
respectively, from occlusal planes of
I, II, III and IV to the HIP plane. . In Multi ple Comparisons
the measured angles, Angle 2 is the Dependent Variable: ANGLE2
least of all, showing that occlusal Tukey HSD
plane II is nearest to the HIP plane
Mean
Dif f erence 95% Conf idence Interv al
In GROUP III (completely (I) GROUP (J) GROUP (I-J) St d. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
edentulous), the mean value and the GROUP I GROUP I I 2.0305483* .3132207 .000 1.279795 2.781301
standard deviation obtained for GROUP I II 1.0975583* .3132207 .002 .346805 1.848311
GROUP I I GROUP I -2.0305483* .3132207 .000 -2.781301 -1.279795
angle was (in degree) 1.57˚±1.37 GROUP I II -.9329900* .3431161 .022 -1.755399 -.110581
from occlusal plane to the HIP GROUP I II GROUP I -1.0975583* .3132207 .002 -1.848311 -.346805
plane. GROUP I I .9329900* .3431161 .022 .110581 1.755399
*. The mean dif f erence is signif icant at the .05 lev el.
INTER GROUP COMPARISON
established closer to the Group II. (Since angle II is
One way ANOVA test between group I (16- closest in group I and II to HIP plane, same was
19yrs-dentulous), group II (50-55yrs-dentulous) compared with the angle of edentulous group)
and group III (completely edentulous). One way
ANOVA results between the groups showed that
they were highly significant indicating that there is
POST HOC TEST
a variation in occlusal plane level for the three
groups. Tukey HSD test indicated that angle II of
group II (50-55yrs-dentulous) is closest to the HIP
plane. Angle of the group III subjects was between
the angle II of the group I and II subjects.
77
Student t-test CONCLUSION
Student t-test was done between all angles Within the limitations of the present study,
for males and females in all the groups. Results it can be concluded that, The HIP plane is parallel to
showed that they were not statistically significant the natural occlusal plane. This plane can be used as
indicating that there is no gender difference for a reference plane to re-establish the occlusal plane
occlusal plane orientation. in edentulous patients. The occlusal plane tends to
be more parallel in Group II subjects (50-55years)
DISCUSSION than the Group I subjects(16-19years).
78
10. Hickey Y, J.C, Zarb, G.A. & Bolender CL. in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent.1985;
Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for 54:81-7.
edentulous patients. CV Mosby Co., St.
Louis.1985; 9: 292 24. Ow RKK, Djeng SK, Ho CK. Orientation of the
plane of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;
11. Broomell IN. The value of temperamental 64:31-6.
indications in the correct prosthesis of entire
dentures. Dental Cosmos. 1897; 39:1. 25. Chaconas SJ, Gonidis D. A cephalometric
technique for prosthodontic diagnosis and
12. Augsburger RH. Occlusal plane relation to treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;
facial type. .J Prosthet Dent. 1953; 3:755-70. 56:567-74.
13. Schlosser FW & Gehl DH. Complete Denture 26. Sivakumar J ,Ramachandran CR, Ranjith V.
Prosthetics .Saunders, Philadelphia. . 1953; Occlusal plane orientation :Statistical and
3:190. clinical analysis in different clinical situations.
J Dent.2008; 17:572-575.
14. Sharry JJ. Complete Denture Prosthodontics.
Lea&Febiger, Philadelphia.1974; 3:236. 27. Harper RNThe Incisive papilla. J Dent R. 1948;
27:661.
15. Ricketts RM. The role of cephalometrics in
prosthetic diagnosis. J Prosthet Dent.1956; 28. Erlich J,Gazit E. Relationship of the maxillary
6:488. central incisor and canines to the incisive
papilla. J Oral Rehabil. 1975; 2:309-12.
16. Levin B, Sauer JL. Results of a survey of
complete denture procedures taught in 29. Grave AMH,Dent M,Becker PJ. Evaluation of the
American and Canadian dental schools. J incisive papilla as a guide to anterior tooth
Prosthet Dent. 1969; 22:171-7. position. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57:712-714.
17. Abrahams R & Carey PP. The use of ala-tragus 30. Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL. Cephalometrically
line for occlusal plane determination in predicted occlusal plane: implications in
complete dentures. J Dent. 1979; 7:339. removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet
Dent.1991; 65:258–264.
18. Van Niekerk FW, Miller VJ, Bibby RE. The ala-
tragus line in complete denture 31. Rich H. Evaluation and registration of HIP
prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53:67-9. plane of occlusion. Aust Dent J. 1982; 27:162-
168
19. Javid NS. A technique for determination of the
occlusal plane. J Prosthet Dent.1974; 31:270-2. 32. Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Bolender CL.
Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous
20. Kazanoglu & Unger. Determining the occlusal Patients. Complete Dentures and Implant-
plane with Camper’s plane indicator. J Prosthet supported Prostheses.St. Louis, MO, Mosby,.
Dent. 1992; 67:499-501 2004; 12: 262-264.
21. Foley P.F. & Latta. A study of the position of 33. Fu PS, Hung CC, Hong JM, et al. Three-
the parotid papilla relative to the occlusal dimensional relationship of the maxillary
plane. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 124. anterior teeth to the incisive papilla in young
adults. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007; 23:519–25
22. Walker, W. Ernest. The Facial Line and Angles
in Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Cosmos. 1897; 34. Fu PS, Hung CC, Hong JM, et al.Three-
39:789-800. dimensional analysis of the occlusal plane
related to the Hamular-Incisive-Papilla
23. Monteith BD. A cephalometric method to
occlusal plane in young adults. J Oral Rehabil.
determine the angulation of the occlusal plane
2007; 34:136–40.
79
35. Kojima T, Sohmura T, Takahashi J. A
preliminary report on a computer-assisted
dental cast analysis system used for the
prosthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;
30:526–531.
80