You are on page 1of 7

Research Article

___________________________________________________ ____________________
J Res Adv Dent 2014; 3:1:74-80.

Three- Dimensional Analysis to Compare Parallelism of Occlusal


Planes to the Hamular Notch-Incisive Papilla Plane in Dentulous
and Edentulous Subjects
Namratha Lakshmi1* Nabaprakash Sahu2 Yoshaskam Agnihotri3 Gaurav Patri4 Gautam Singh5
Sambarta Das6

1SeniorLecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
2SeniorLecturer, Department of Prosthodontics, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
3Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
4Reader, Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Kalinga institute of Dental sciences, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.
5Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Darshan Dental College, Udaipur, Rajasthan, India.
6Senior Lecturer, Department of Conservative Dentistry, Hi Tech Dental College and Hospital, Bhubaneswar, Orrisa, India.

ABSTRACT

Purpose: To evaluate the reliability of hamular notch-incisive papilla plane as an anatomical landmark in
establishing occlusal plane in edentulous subjects.

Materials and Methods: Seventy subjects were selected from the South Indian population, of which fifty were
dentulous and twenty were edentulous. Dental stone casts were fabricated for dentulous and edentulous
subjects. Dental stone casts of the dentulous and edentulous subjects, along with occlusal rims were analysed
using three dimensional analysing machine. The angles between the occlusal planes and H.I.P plane were
determined using reference coordinate system based on characteristic points in the dentition on the cusp tips in
dentulous casts and on maxillary occlusal rim on edentulous casts.

Results: The HIP plane tends to be parallel to the occlusal plane. There is no statistical difference between sexes.

Conclusion: The HIP plane is parallel to the natural occlusal plane and also the HIP plane can be used as a
reference plane to re-establish the occlusal plane in edentulous patients.

Keywords: Anatomical landmarks, Occlusal plane, HIP plane, Three dimensional analysing machine.

INTRODUCTION are not in a straight line. The occlusal plane is


determined anteriorly by the maxillary incisor teeth
The occlusal plane is an anatomical entity, and posteriorly by the retromolar pads. The
maintained by various physiological factors. A junction of the upper and middle thirds of the
perfect inter-play between many factors contributes retromolar pads are the usual posterior
to the configuration of the plane of occlusion in landmarks2,3.
human gnathodynamics. The glossary of
prosthodontic terms (2005) defines occlusal plane
1 Although plane refers to a flat surface, the
as “the average plane established by the incisal and occlusal plane is not a straight line; rather it is a
occlusal surfaces of the teeth.” A plane is curve, representing the average curvature of the
determined by at least three reference points that occlusal surfaces. The curvatures of occlusal plane

_______________________________________________________________________________________

Copyright ©2013
are due to a large extent to the varying degrees of posterior teeth and incisal edges of anterior teeth
inclinations of natural teeth2,4,5,6. Anatomical and in edentulous situations, it is established using
landmarks that have been suggested to clinically ala-tragal and interpupillary reference planes.
help to determine the position of the occlusal plane
are the upper lip, corners of the mouth4, lateral MATERIALS AND METHOD
margins of the tongue7,8 buccinator grooves4, two-
Seventy subjects were chosen of which fifty
thirds of the height of the retromolar pad9,10,
were dentulous and twenty were edentulous
parallel to the Camper’s plane or ala-tragus
subjects. The dentulous group was subdivided into
line4,5,6,11-20, 3.3mm below the parotid papilla21 etc.
two groups as
Orientation of the occlusal plane is lost in
Group I: consisting of 30 dentulous subjects of age
patients rendered edentulous and should be
group 16-19 years, no attrition, of which 19 were
relocated if complete dentures are to be esthetic
men and 11 were women.
and functional. It is difficult to find optimal position
of occlusal plane in every edentulous patient using Group II: consisting of 20 dentulous subjects of 50-
the reported soft tissue landmarks22. Improper use 55 years age group with moderate to severe
of these landmarks may compromise the functional attritional patterns on the occlusal surfaces of the
and esthetic result of the intended prosthetic teeth and
rehabilitation23-26.
Group III: consisting of 20 completely edentulous
H.I.P. was reported in the literature to be subjects.
useful in establishing the occlusal plane. The H.I.P.
plane can be defined as a plane extending from the Dental stone casts of dentulous and the
hamular notches of the pterygoid hamulus to the edentulous subjects were fabricated. In the
incisive papilla. From these structures, the edentulous casts, the maxillary occlusal rims were
abbreviation H.I.P. plane was derived. This plane fabricated and the occlusal plane was clinically
remains unaltered even with loss of teeth, as established parallel to Camper’s line5,7,9,14,18,32 and
incisive papilla and hamular notches appeared to be mid line was marked on the anterior aspect of the
least affected by residual ridge resorption and occlusal rim.
remains visible27-30.
Standardization of the models
The hamular notch and incisive papilla
reference plane (HIP) has been recognized by Base former was used to establish the
Cooperman and Willard (1960) as representing a upper casts of all subjects. Prior to each
“transit line plane” to diagnostically relate the measurement, bases of the gypsum models were
maxillary arch to a horizontal reference table to corrected to parallel the granite platform of the
disclose the degree of diseased occlusion in the three-dimensional precise measuring device.The
natural dentition and in prostheses31. dental stone casts of the dentulous and edentulous
subjects were subjected to the three dimensional
Some authors have opined that angulation analysis machine for measuring required angles.
of the occlusal plane is generally related to skeletal
base of maxilla and that the occlusal plane tends to Surveying tools, Positions and Methods
be parallel to HIP plane (Rich, 1982)31. Herculus
This experiment utilized the accurate
C.Karkazis et al concurred with this view after a
three-dimensional precise measuring device [Fig.
cephalometric analysis of edentulous subjects30.
1]. The tip of the electron probe was 1 mm in
Rich31, Karkazis and Polyzois30observed the diameter with a liner accuracy of 0.003mm. All the
parallel relation between HIP plane and occlusal measured data were recorded and analysed with
plane. This study was designed to identify the the three-dimensional surveying software. In the
parallel relationship of the HIP plane and maxillary dentulous casts, the midpoint of the incisive papilla
occlusal plane. In dentulous situations, the defined and deepest points of the hamular notches were
occlusal plane passes through the cusp tips of the lightly touched by the electron probe of the three-

75
dimensional analysis machine, to determine the HIP
plane [fig. 1, 2].

In a similar way, the occlusal plane I (


joining mesio-labial incisal edge of upper right
central incisor mesio-buccal cusp tips of upper first
molars), occlusal plane II (joining mesio-labial
incisal edge of upper right central incisor — mesio-
buccal cusp tips of upper second molars), occlusal
plane III(joining mesio-labial incisal edge of upper
right central incisor — mesio-palatal cusp tips of
upper first molars) and occlusal plane IV(joining
mesio-labial incisal edge of upper right central
incisor — mesio-palatal cusp tips of upper second
molars) were determined33 [fig. 3].
Fig 3: Showing four occlusal planes and HIP plane.

Fig 4: Showing the determined occlusal plane and HIP


plane.

The angle between the HIP plane and each


Fig 1: Ruby tip electron probe of the three-dimensional of the four different occlusal planes was measured;
analysis machine. such an angle can be termed included angle. The
general premise is: the lesser the included angle
between the HIP plane and the occlusal plane
chosen for evaluation, the greater would be the
parallelism of that plane with HIP plane.

Included angles were measured between


the HIP plane and the occlusal planes in group I and
group II dental stone casts of the dentulous subjects
using software (Metrologic-XG(FRANCE).

In edentulous stone casts, a single angle


was measured between the plane determined by
joining the anterior reference point (marked near
Fig 2: Electron probe of the three-dimensional analysis mesial aspect of the right central incisor region) and
machine being used for determining the occlusal planes. posterior reference points (joining the posterior
points marked 1.5cm from the deepest points of the

76
ANOVA
hamular notches on the cast and transferred to the ANGLE2
occlusal rim on the right and left second molar Sum of
regions) on clinically established occlusal plane and Squares df Mean Square F Sig.
Between Groups 50.641 2 25.320 21.507 .000
HIP plane [fig. 4]. Within Groups 78.878 67 1.177
Total 129.519 69
RESULTS
One way ANOVA between the groups has statistically
The mean and standard deviation values significant difference with P value at 0.00 levels.
for the angles were measured from the occlusal
Line diagram 1: showing relationship between the angles of
planes to the hamular notch incisive papilla plane the three groups
for Group I, II and III subjects maxillary casts
(16yrs-19 yrs-dentulous) and Pearson’s correlation
test was done for individual groups.
d ANGLE 2
In GROUP I (16yrs-19yrs-dentulous), the e
mean values with standard deviation obtained for i g
angles I, II, III AND IV were(in degrees) 3.14˚±1.19, n r
2.67˚±1.15, 4.41˚±1.14 and 3.72˚±1.22 respectively, e GROUP1
from occlusal planes of I, II, III and IV to the HIP …
GROUP 2
plane. In the measured angles, Angle 2 is the least of
all, showing that occlusal plane II is nearest to the GROUP 3
HIP plane
The horizontal axis shows the Groups and
In GROUP II (50-55yrs-dentulous), the the vertical axis shows the means of the angles of
mean values and their standard deviations obtained three groups in degrees. The Group I has the highest
for angles I, II, III AND IV were(in degrees) mean value and the Group II has the smallest mean
1.25˚±0.92, 0.64˚±0.49,2.19˚±1.04and 1.69˚±0.92 value. The angle of the Group III tends to be
respectively, from occlusal planes of
I, II, III and IV to the HIP plane. . In Multi ple Comparisons
the measured angles, Angle 2 is the Dependent Variable: ANGLE2
least of all, showing that occlusal Tukey HSD
plane II is nearest to the HIP plane
Mean
Dif f erence 95% Conf idence Interv al
In GROUP III (completely (I) GROUP (J) GROUP (I-J) St d. Error Sig. Lower Bound Upper Bound
edentulous), the mean value and the GROUP I GROUP I I 2.0305483* .3132207 .000 1.279795 2.781301
standard deviation obtained for GROUP I II 1.0975583* .3132207 .002 .346805 1.848311
GROUP I I GROUP I -2.0305483* .3132207 .000 -2.781301 -1.279795
angle was (in degree) 1.57˚±1.37 GROUP I II -.9329900* .3431161 .022 -1.755399 -.110581
from occlusal plane to the HIP GROUP I II GROUP I -1.0975583* .3132207 .002 -1.848311 -.346805
plane. GROUP I I .9329900* .3431161 .022 .110581 1.755399
*. The mean dif f erence is signif icant at the .05 lev el.
INTER GROUP COMPARISON
established closer to the Group II. (Since angle II is
One way ANOVA test between group I (16- closest in group I and II to HIP plane, same was
19yrs-dentulous), group II (50-55yrs-dentulous) compared with the angle of edentulous group)
and group III (completely edentulous). One way
ANOVA results between the groups showed that
they were highly significant indicating that there is
POST HOC TEST
a variation in occlusal plane level for the three
groups. Tukey HSD test indicated that angle II of
group II (50-55yrs-dentulous) is closest to the HIP
plane. Angle of the group III subjects was between
the angle II of the group I and II subjects.

77
Student t-test CONCLUSION

Student t-test was done between all angles Within the limitations of the present study,
for males and females in all the groups. Results it can be concluded that, The HIP plane is parallel to
showed that they were not statistically significant the natural occlusal plane. This plane can be used as
indicating that there is no gender difference for a reference plane to re-establish the occlusal plane
occlusal plane orientation. in edentulous patients. The occlusal plane tends to
be more parallel in Group II subjects (50-55years)
DISCUSSION than the Group I subjects(16-19years).

This study used the tip of the electron CONFLICT OF INTEREST


probe of 1mm diameter of the three dimensional
measuring machine to analyze various reference No potential conflict of interest relevant to this
points in the dental casts (Yamastita, Ayoub, article was reported.
Somura and Kojima etal 2003 and Wakabayashi in
2002 and 1997)34. This procedure has been proved REFERENCES
to be an accurate method for determining the
1. The Glossary of Prosthodontic Terms. J
occlusal plane, as has been shown in the previous
ProsthetDent.2005; 94:10-92.
studies conducted by Arakawa 1980, Otthoff et al
200035, Kojima 200334 and P.S. Fu et al 200733. The 2. Curtis TA, Shaw EL, Curtis DA. The influence of
apparent limitation of analyzing the dental casts removable prosthodontic procedures and
could be that there can be some error while concepts on the esthetics of complete dentures.
matching reference points and fabrication of bite J Prosthet Dent 1987; 57:315-23.
blocks. However, accuracy of the electron probe
(0.003mm) makes the error negligible. The results 3. Shigli K, Chetal B.R, Jabade J. Validity of soft
of the present study confirm the previous tissue landmarks in determining the occlusal
observations of Rich31 and Karkazis and Polyzois30 plane. J Indian Prosthodont Soc.2005; 5:139-
that the HIP plane tends to be parallel to the 145.
occlusal plane.
4. Lundquist D,Luther W. Occlusal plane
When the dentition is defective, there is a determination. J Prosthet Dent. 1970; 23:489–
need to establish occlusal plane based on 498.
characteristic points of certain intra-oral anatomic
landmarks, regardless of the dentition. In this study, 5. Williams D R. Occlusal plane orientation in
both males and females were examined in all three complete denture construction. J Dent.1982;
age groups. The results showed that there is no 10:311-316.
statistical difference between both sexes. This
6. Gupta R, Himanshu A, Singh SP. Relationship of
indicates that HIP plane can be used as a guide to
anatomical landmarks with occlusal plane. J
establish occlusal plane irrespective of the gender.
Indian Prosthodont Soc.2009; 9:142-147.
The present study revealed that the
7. Landa J.A. A scientific approach to the study of
occlusal plane II was most parallel to HIP plane in
the temporomandibular joint and its relation
dentulous subjects suggesting that HIP plane can be
to occlusal disharmonies. J Prosthet Dent.
used as another anatomical landmark for the
1957; 7: 170.
orientation of the occlusal plane in edentulous
subjects. 8. Yasaki M. Height of the occlusion rim and the
inter-occlusal distance. J Prosthet Dent. 1961;
There exists a definite parallelism between
11: 26.
occlusal plane and HIP plane. The three
dimensional analyzer can be used to perform direct 9. Ismail YH & Bowman JF. Position of the
measurement of the dental cast and express occlusal plane in natural and artificial teeth. J
occlusal plane in a co-ordinate system. Prosthet Dent. 1968; 20: 407.

78
10. Hickey Y, J.C, Zarb, G.A. & Bolender CL. in edentulous patients. J Prosthet Dent.1985;
Boucher's prosthodontic treatment for 54:81-7.
edentulous patients. CV Mosby Co., St.
Louis.1985; 9: 292 24. Ow RKK, Djeng SK, Ho CK. Orientation of the
plane of occlusion. J Prosthet Dent. 1990;
11. Broomell IN. The value of temperamental 64:31-6.
indications in the correct prosthesis of entire
dentures. Dental Cosmos. 1897; 39:1. 25. Chaconas SJ, Gonidis D. A cephalometric
technique for prosthodontic diagnosis and
12. Augsburger RH. Occlusal plane relation to treatment planning. J Prosthet Dent. 1986;
facial type. .J Prosthet Dent. 1953; 3:755-70. 56:567-74.

13. Schlosser FW & Gehl DH. Complete Denture 26. Sivakumar J ,Ramachandran CR, Ranjith V.
Prosthetics .Saunders, Philadelphia. . 1953; Occlusal plane orientation :Statistical and
3:190. clinical analysis in different clinical situations.
J Dent.2008; 17:572-575.
14. Sharry JJ. Complete Denture Prosthodontics.
Lea&Febiger, Philadelphia.1974; 3:236. 27. Harper RNThe Incisive papilla. J Dent R. 1948;
27:661.
15. Ricketts RM. The role of cephalometrics in
prosthetic diagnosis. J Prosthet Dent.1956; 28. Erlich J,Gazit E. Relationship of the maxillary
6:488. central incisor and canines to the incisive
papilla. J Oral Rehabil. 1975; 2:309-12.
16. Levin B, Sauer JL. Results of a survey of
complete denture procedures taught in 29. Grave AMH,Dent M,Becker PJ. Evaluation of the
American and Canadian dental schools. J incisive papilla as a guide to anterior tooth
Prosthet Dent. 1969; 22:171-7. position. J Prosthet Dent. 1987; 57:712-714.

17. Abrahams R & Carey PP. The use of ala-tragus 30. Karkazis HC, Polyzois GL. Cephalometrically
line for occlusal plane determination in predicted occlusal plane: implications in
complete dentures. J Dent. 1979; 7:339. removable prosthodontics. J Prosthet
Dent.1991; 65:258–264.
18. Van Niekerk FW, Miller VJ, Bibby RE. The ala-
tragus line in complete denture 31. Rich H. Evaluation and registration of HIP
prosthodontics. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53:67-9. plane of occlusion. Aust Dent J. 1982; 27:162-
168
19. Javid NS. A technique for determination of the
occlusal plane. J Prosthet Dent.1974; 31:270-2. 32. Zarb GA, Carlsson GE, Bolender CL.
Prosthodontic Treatment for Edentulous
20. Kazanoglu & Unger. Determining the occlusal Patients. Complete Dentures and Implant-
plane with Camper’s plane indicator. J Prosthet supported Prostheses.St. Louis, MO, Mosby,.
Dent. 1992; 67:499-501 2004; 12: 262-264.

21. Foley P.F. & Latta. A study of the position of 33. Fu PS, Hung CC, Hong JM, et al. Three-
the parotid papilla relative to the occlusal dimensional relationship of the maxillary
plane. J Prosthet Dent. 1985; 53: 124. anterior teeth to the incisive papilla in young
adults. Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007; 23:519–25
22. Walker, W. Ernest. The Facial Line and Angles
in Prosthetic Dentistry, Dental Cosmos. 1897; 34. Fu PS, Hung CC, Hong JM, et al.Three-
39:789-800. dimensional analysis of the occlusal plane
related to the Hamular-Incisive-Papilla
23. Monteith BD. A cephalometric method to
occlusal plane in young adults. J Oral Rehabil.
determine the angulation of the occlusal plane
2007; 34:136–40.

79
35. Kojima T, Sohmura T, Takahashi J. A
preliminary report on a computer-assisted
dental cast analysis system used for the
prosthodontic treatment. J Oral Rehabil. 2003;
30:526–531.

80

You might also like