Plagiarism Scan Report

Summary
Report Genrated Date 26 Feb, 2018
Plagiarism Status 100% Unique
Total Words 243
Total Characters 1639
Any Ignore Url Used

m
Content Checked For Plagiarism:

co
Several reasons were counseled or the di ferential in consuming styles between men and
women (Myerson, 1940; Gus ield, 1962; Lisansky,1958). Windham and Aldridge (1965) as
well as Siegel (1952) noted the traditional perception that the use and abuse o alcohol

s.
changed into a male prerogative. Clark (1967) suggested that drinking di ferences are
based largely on the expectation that emale sex roles are characterized by what he
termed "conventionality." By this he re erred to the "acceptance o the dominant 'o ficial'

l
standards o morality and propriety" Preston (1964) similarly asserted that drinking is
oo
o ten a symbol that di ferentiates the sexes. Windham and Aldridge (1965) additionally
pointed out that women traditionally tended to be economically dependent on and
subordinate to men. In this regard, Knup er, Fink, & Go fman (1963) emphasized that other
T

members o the population who do not earn their living by paid work also have more
restricted drinking privileges than adult ree males- or example, children, prisoners,
eo

mental patients, and persons on relie . Wilsnack & Wilsnack (1978) point out that increased
drinking among emales might be a result o the women’s movement and changes in
women’s roles, especially changes that involve exposure to ormerly masculine
lS

environments and roles. They suggest that changes in sex roles might increase women’s
exposure to alcohol and opportunities to drink. It might modi y traditional norms against
emale drinking, thereby making drinking more permissible and might o fer emales new
al

goals and aspirations, hence, causing stress that alcohol might be used to reduce.
m

Report generated by smallseotools.com

S