5 Nov 2018 Page 1 of 3

Intern Name: Carolyn Brashar

Internship: Student Teaching Elementary Grad

Submitted: Oct 9, 2018 Supervisor(s): Elizabeth Hartley

Course/Term: ED S688 - J01 : Stdnt Tchg: MAT Spcl Ed -Local ( FALL 2018 ) Mentor(s): Lindsey Huberty
Assessor: Lindsey Huberty (Mentor) Site: Susitna Elementry, 7500 Tyone Court, Anchorage AK 99504
Comments: Subject(s): Elementary Graduate
Grade(s): K

Health Lesson Observation ELEM GRAD

Date of Lesson

Lesson Name

Grade Level

Number of Students

Time of Day

Please share the above information and any other information to set the context of this lesson.

Please click on the rubric box that best describes each element below. Please add comments and observation notes by clicking on the bubble.

Rubric

Meets the Standard for a Exceeds Expectations:

Developing (1.000 pts) Beginning Teacher (2.000 Professional Level (3.000 Not Applicable N/A
pts) pts)
Lesson Design Needs development All elements are complete Complete and professional
1/20 (5%) lesson design
ACEI-2008.3.1

Comments:
Lesson The objective is not clear Objective(s) clearly stated Objective(s) clearly stated
Objective in the lesson plan in plan and are understood
1/20 (5%) by students
Comments: Remember to state the objective at the begining of the lesson. Today we are _____. At the end of this lesson, you will be able to _______.
Not prepared; not Prepared and organized Prepared and organized:
Preparation
1/20 (5%)
organized lesson flowed with minimal
use of notes
Comments:
Developmental Not appropriate for age Appropriate for age group Lesson adjusted to be
Appropriateness group: too hard or too developmentally
1/20 (5%) easy appropriate for all students
AK-UAS-SGP.2,
ACEI-2008.1

Comments: Great job implementing school proceedures within the lesson and using them as discussion.
Content Not accurate; not current Accurate content Accurate and current
Knowledge knowledge content knowledge
1/20 (5%)
AK-UAS-SGP.4,
ACEI-2008.2.6

Comments:
Context in Lesson not related to Lesson presented in Lesson/activities taught in
Curriculum curriculum context of the curriculum relationship to previous
1/20 (5%) and future curriculum
ACEI-2008.3.1

Comments:
Proactive Routines and procedures Routines and procedures Routines and procedures
Classroom are not apparent are evident promote student
Management engagement
1/20 (5%)
AK-UAS-SGP.6,
ACEI-2008.3.4
5 Nov 2018 Page 2 of 3
Comments: There were several disengaged students. Some kids were talking to eachother throuhout the majority of the lesson.
Management of Behavior not well Student behavior is Management of behavior
Student managed: behavior managed promoted engagement
Behavior interferes with learning and learning
1/20 (5%)

Comments:
Engagement Students are not engaged Students are engaged Students are interested
1/20 (5%) and engaged in learning
AK-UAS-SGP.6,
ACEI-2008.3.4

Comments: This lesson was lecture based. Is there a way to make the lesson more student led since it's an SEL lesson?
Directions & Students do not Students understand Students understand and
Instructions understand instructions instructions follow clearly
1/20 (5%) communicated instructions
7 sentences - this is more than you've asked students to write at once this year. Could these questions have been prepared earlier? Many
Comments:
kiddos were waiting for you to write the questions on the board before they could begin. Was this supposed to be written in paragraph form?
Differentiation not present Appropriate differentiation Activities were Differentiation is not
is present for some differentiated for appropriate for this lesson
Differentiation students individuals and groups
1/20 (5%)
AK-UAS-SGP.3,
while maintain high
ACEI-2008.3.2 expectations that align with
the objective(s) for all
students
What were the expectations for students who need more time/thoughts? Were expectations the same for all students? What differences
Comments:
were there for Sped/AEL students?

Higher Order The lesson did not provide Some tasks or questions A variety of tasks or Higher order or creative
Thinking opportunity for higher provided opportunity for questions promoted higher thinking is not an element
1/20 (5%) order thinking: rote higher order thinking order thinking, problem in this lesson
ACEI-2008.3.3 learning solving, and/or creativity
Comments:
Learning or instructional Some instructional Learning strategies,
strategies not used or not strategies or techniques scaffolding and other
Strategies effective were used instructional techniques
1/20 (5%) that align with the
objective(s) were used
effectively
Comments:
Technology not used Technology used Technology was used The use of technology was
Technology
effectively or appropriately effectively to enhance effectively and wisely and not appropriate for this
1/20 (5%)
AK-UAS-SGP.9 learning was relevant to the lesson
objective(s).
Comments:
Informal assessment was Informal or formative Formative assessment
Formative not used to monitor assessments was used to provided feedback for the
Assessment student learning monitor student learning learners and was aligned
1/20 (5%)
with and supported the
AK-UAS-SGP.5,
ACEI-2008.4.1 accomplishment of the
objective(s).
Comments:
Responsiveness Student needs were not Teacher candidate The teacher candidate was
1/20 (5%) noticed or not attended to responded to student flexible and responsive to
ACEI-2008.3.1 needs student needs
Comments:
Lesson Students did not meet the Most students met the All students met the
Effectiveness objectives objectives learning objectives
1/20 (5%)
AK-UAS-SGP.5,
ACEI-2008.3.1

Comments:
The teacher candidate The teacher candidate is The teacher candidate
Focus
1/20 (5%)
focused on self beginning to focus on focused on student
student learning learning
Comments:
The teacher candidate The teacher candidate The teacher candidate
Reflection was unable to reflect reflected on lesson design, reflected on lesson design,
1/20 (5%)
AK-UAS-SGP.8,
accurately management and learning management and learning
ACEI-2008.5.1 as well as future
adjustments and plans
Comments:
5 Nov 2018 Page 3 of 3
The teacher candidate The teacher candidate The teacher candidate
Feedback was resistant to feedback. accepted feedback in a solicited feedback in a
1/20 (5%)
professional manner professional manner and
AK-UAS-SGP.8,
ACEI-2008.5.2 made plans for
improvement
Comments:
39.000 pts | 65 %