You are on page 1of 109

The Design of Fiber Reinforced

Polymers for Structural


Strengthening
An Overview of ACI 440
Guidelines

Sarah Witt
Fyfe Company
November 7, 2008
1
GUIDE FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF EXTERNALLY
BONDED FRP SYSTEMS FOR
STRENGTHENING CONCRETE
STRUCTURES

ACI Document 440.2R-08


Printed July 2008

2
Outline
 Strengthening Concrete Structures
Reasons for strengthening
Types of FRP strengthening systems
Materials and properties of FRP strengthening systems
 Substrate Preparation/FRP Application
Repair
Proper detailing and installation methods
Quality control
 Design Principles
Strengthening limits
Flexural strengthening
Shear strengthening
Axial strengthening
 Reinforcement Details
Bond and delamination
Detailing of laps and splices
 Design Examples and Case Studies
3
Reasons for Strengthening

 Change in use
 Construction or design defects
 Code changes
 Seismic retrofit
Deterioration

4
Excessive Loading

5
Flexural Cracking

6
Overloading

7
Seismic Loads

8
Improper Steel Placement

9
Impact Damage

10
Typical FRP Systems for
Strengthening Structures
Section 3.2, Guide:  Wet lay-up systems
Unidirectional fiber sheets
Multidirectional fiber sheets
Mechanically applied fiber tows
 Prepreg systems
Unidirectional fiber sheets
Multidirectional fiber sheets
Mechanically applied fiber tows
 Precured systems
Unidirectional laminates
Multidirectional grids
Shell elements
 Other forms not covered

11
Typical FRP Systems for
Strengthening Structures

12
Typical FRP Systems for
Strengthening Structures

13
Typical Fiber Properties

Carbon

Aramid

E-Glass

14
Substrate Preparation / Repair
Bond vs. Contact Critical

 Contact Critical
Requires intimate contact between the FRP
System and the concrete
c Confinement of columns
 Bond Critical
Requires an adhesive bond between the FRP
system and the concrete
c Beam, slab and wall strengthening

15
Substrate Preparation / Repair
Section 6.4, Guide:
 Substrate issues:
c ACI 503
c ICRI 03730

 200 psi (1.4 MPa)


minimum tensile
strength
 2500 psi minimum
compressive strength of
concrete Removal / replacement
of unsound concrete

16
Substrate Preparation
Section 6.4, Guide:

Minimum ICRI CSP 3

Preparation of concrete surface

17
Epoxy Injection
Section 6.4, Guide:
 Cracks wider than
0.010 in (0.3 mm)
should be injected
prior to application
of the FRP system.
ACI 224.1

 Smaller cracks in
aggressive
environments may
require sealing

18
Quality Control & Assurance
During-construction:

 Bond testing
ACI 503R
ASTM D4541
Tension adhesion strengths
should exceed 200 psi (1.4 MPa),
exhibit failure of the concrete substrate.

 Cured thickness
Extract small core samples less than 0.5 in (13 mm)
diameter
Avoid sampling in high stress areas if possible
Repair using overlapping sheets on filled core.
19
Quality Control & Assurance
Post-construction:
 General Acceptance Criteria for Delaminations
Wet Layup
c Delaminations less than 2 in2 (1300 mm2) each are permissible:
¡ No more than 10 delaminations per 10 ft2 of laminate area
¡ Total delamination area less than 5% of total laminate area
c Delaminations less than 25 in2 (16,000 mm2) may be repaired by resin
injection or ply replacement, depending upon the size, number and
location of delaminations.
c Delaminations greater than 25 in2 (16,000 mm2) should be repaired
by selectively cutting away the affected sheet and applying an
overlapping sheet patch of equivalent plies.
Precured systems
c Each delamination must be inspected and repaired in accordance with
the engineer’s direction

20
Design Guidelines

21
FRP Strengthening Applications
Flexural Strengthening
Beams, Slabs, Walls, etc.

Shear Strengthening
Beams, Columns, Walls, etc.

Axial Enhancement
Column Wrapping, Pressure Vessels

22
Strengthening Limits
Section 9.2, Guide:

 Limited by strength of other structural components


Columns, footings, etc.
 Limited by other failure mechanisms
Punching shear
 Loss of FRP should not result in immediate
collapse

(φRn )existing ≥ (1.1SDL + 0.75 SLL )new (9-1)

23
Structural Fire Endurance

 Glass Transition Temperatures of most FRP


systems is typically in the range of 140 - 180oF
(60 - 80oC)
 Use of an insulation system can improve the
overall fire rating of the strengthened reinforced
concrete member
 Insulation system can delay strength
degradation of concrete and steel, increasing the
fire rating of the member
 The contribution of the FRP system can be
considered if it is demonstrated that the FRP
temperature remains below a critical temperature

24
Rational Fire Endurance Check
ACI 216R:
 Given cover and fire endurance requirement
 Find the temperature of the steel & concrete
 Find a reduced steel & concrete material
strength
 Find the associated reduced section strength
 Reduced strength > Unfactored demand
 No phi factors or load factors

25
Rational Fire Endurance Check
Section 9.2.1, Guide:
 From ACI 216R - Reduce material strengths at elevated
temperature:

Steel: f y → f yθ
Concrete: f 'c → f 'cθ

FRP: f fu → 0 *

(Rn )existing ≥ (S DL + S LL ) (9-2)

26
Maximum Service Temperature
Section 1.3.3, Guide:
 Typical glass transition temperature (Tg) for epoxy 140 -

180oF (60 - 80oC)

 Above Tg mechanical properties start to degrade

 Service temperature should not exceed Tg - 27°F (Tg – 15°C)

27
Flexural Strengthening
Chapter 10, Guide

 Typical flexural strength increases up to 40%


This limit is based on the Guide’s requirements
 Positive and negative moment strengthening
 Add strength to RC and PC members
 Reduce crack widths
 Seismic loadings not covered

φM n > M u (10-1)

28
Assumptions
Section 10.2.1, Guide:

 Design calculations are based on actual


dimensions and material properties.
 Plane sections remain plane (including FRP).
 Maximum compressive strain ε cu = 0.003
 Tensile strength of concrete is ignored.
 FRP has linear-elastic relation to failure.
 Perfect bond between FRP and concrete (no
slip).
 The shear deformation within the adhesive layer
is neglected.

29
Verification of Shear Capacity
Section 10.2.1, Guide:

Section shear capacity must be


sufficient to handle shear forces
associated with increased flexural
capacity.

30
Failure Modes
Section 10.1.1, Guide:

1. crushing of concrete prior to steel yield


2. yield of steel followed by concrete crushing
3. yield of steel followed by FRP failure
4. shear / tension delamination in concrete cover
5. FRP debonding from substrate

The desired mode of failure is usually mode 2 or 3.

31
Effective Strain in FRP
600
Rupture Strain
500

400
Stress (ksi)

Effective Strain
300

200

100

0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02
Strain (in/in)
32
Limitation on Strain in FRP
To prevent debonding in regions away from FRP Termination

f c' (10-2) US
ε fd = 0.083 ≤ 0.9 ε fu
nE f t f

f c'
ε fd = 0.41 ≤ 0.9 ε fu
nE f t f (10-2) SI

⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd (10-3)
⎝ c ⎠

33
Calculation Procedure
Determine initial strain in substrate

Estimate neutral axis, c

Determine failure mode Compute Moment Capacity

Calculate material strain Check service conditions

Calculate stresses and forces

Check Equilibrium (Calculate c)

No Estimated c = Yes
c for Equilibrium?

34
Estimate the Neutral Axis Depth
 No closed form
solution exists εc
 Must find depth to the
neutral axis by trial c
and error
 As a starting point, a
good rule of thumb is
20% of the effective εs
section depth
εfe εbi
c ≈ 0.20 d εb

35
Determine Mode of Failure

⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd (10-3)
⎝ c ⎠
⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd Concrete Crushing Controls
⎝ c ⎠

⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≥ ε fd FRP Rupture Controls
⎝ c ⎠

36
Concrete Stress Block

 Whitney stress block is


valid only when
γf 'c
concrete crushing
governs failure (i.e., c β1c
εc=0.003)
 If FRP rupture controls,
a stress block Actual Equivalent
appropriate for the Stress Stress
concrete strain level Distribution Distribution
should be used

37
Concrete Stress Block

εc < 0.003 β1 = 2 −
[
4 (ε c ε c′ ) − tan −1 (ε c ε c′ ) ]
(
(ε c ε c′ ) ln 1 + ε c2 ε c′2 )

γ=
(
0.90ln 1 + ε c2 ε′c2 )
γf'c β1ε c ε′c

β1c 1.71f c′
ε′c =
Ec

38
Calculation of Flexural Strain
 Assume strain
compatibility εc
 Based on failure mode
c
 Calculate the strain in each
material by similar
triangles

εs
⎛ d −c ⎞ εfe εbi
ε s = (ε fe + ε bi ) ⎜⎜ ⎟

(10-10)
εb
d
⎝ f − c ⎠

39
Calculation Of Stress

Steel – Elastic / Plastic:

Stress
FRP

f s = Esε s ≤ f y (10-11)

FRP – Elastic:

f fe = Esε fe (10-9)
Steel

Strain

40
Check Force Equilibrium
 Sum forces in the horizontal
direction
 If forces do not equilibrate,
revise “c” α1 f
'c
 Repeat previous steps β1c

As f s + A f f fe
cest =
β1α 1 f c′ b Asfs
Afff

41
Ultimate Strength Model
εc
c

εs fs

Af = n tf wf εfe εbi ffe = Ef εfe

⎛ β1c ⎞ ⎛ β1c ⎞
M n = As f s ⎜ d − ⎟ + ψ f A f f fe ⎜ h − ⎟ (10-13)
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
42
Loss in Ductility
φ ≈0.75ρb
ACI 318 :
A section with lower 0.90
ductility should ρb
compensate with a
0.65
higher reserve of
strength

εsy 0.005 Steel


⎧ Strain at
0.90 for ε t ≥ 0.005
0.25(ε t − ε sy )
⎪ Ultimate

φ = ⎨0.65 + for ε sy < ε t < 0.005 (10-5)
⎪ 0.005 − ε sy
⎪⎩ 0.65 for ε t ≤ ε sy
43
Design Flexural Strength

⎡ ⎛ β1c ⎞ ⎛ β1c ⎞⎤
φM n = φ ⎢ As f s ⎜ d − ⎟ +ψA f f fe ⎜ h − ⎟⎥ (10-13)
⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠⎦
Reduction factor for FRP contribution: ψ = 0.85

φM n > M u (10-1)

44
Serviceability
At service, stress in steel should be limited to 80% of
yield strength:
Mu
FRP Strengthened
Moment

My
Ms Unstrengthened

f s , s ≤ .80 f y (10-6)

Curvature
45
Prestressed Concrete Members
Assumptions

 Assumptions for concrete members apply


 strain compatibility for strain or change in strain
in the prestressing steel
 prestressing steel rupture mode should be
investigated
 where prestressing steel is draped several
sections should be evaluated

46
Prestressed Concrete Members
Failure Modes

1. Strain level in FRP governed by strain


limitations due:
1. concrete crushing
2. FRP rupture
3. FRP debonding
4. Prestressing steel failure

47
Prestressed Concrete Members
Strength Reduction Factor

To maintain a sufficient ductility the nominal strain in the


prestressing steel should be higher than 0.013. If this
strain is not achieved a lower strength factor should be
used

⎧ 0.90 for ε ps ≥ 0.013


⎪⎪ 0.25 (ε ps − 0.010) (10-19)
φ = ⎨0.65 + for 0.010 < ε ps < 0.013
⎪ (0.013 − 0.010)
⎪⎩ 0.65 for ε ps ≤ 0.010

48
Prestressed Concrete Members
Serviceability

In service stress in the prestressing steel should be prevented


from yielding:

f ps , s ≤ 0.82 f py (10-20a)

f ps , s ≤ 0.74 f pu (10-20b)

49
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength

•The calculation procedure for nominal strength:


• satisfy should strain compatibility
•satisfy force equilibrium
•consider mode of failure
•similar to method for reinforced members

50
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength

For a given value of the neutral axis, c:

Stress level in the FRP f fe = E f ε fe (10-21)

P ⎛ e2 ⎞
Strain in the tendon ε ps = ε pe + e ⎜⎜1 + 2 ⎟⎟ + ε pnet ≤ 0.035 (10-22)
Ac Ec ⎝ r ⎠

51
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength
The value of enet depends on the mode of failure

⎛ dp −c ⎞
ε pnet ≤ 0.003 ⎜⎜ ⎟ (10-23a)
concrete crushing
c ⎟
⎝ ⎠

⎛ dP − c ⎞
FRP rupture or
ε pnet ≤ (ε fe + ε bi )⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟ (10-23b)
debonding
d
⎝ f − c ⎠

52
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength

Force equilibrium can be checked by satisfying:

Ap f ps + A f f fe
c= (10-25)

α f β1b
1 c
'

53
Case Study – Slab Upgrade

P/T flat slab live


load increase:
50 – 100 psf

54
Case Study – Slab Upgrade

Positive moment
upgrade to
column strip

55
Shear Strengthening
Chapter 11, Guide
 Increase shear capacity of beams or columns
Amount of increase depends on section geometry,
existing reinforcement, and a variety of additional
factors.
 Change failure mode to flexural
Typically results in a more ductile failure

φVn > Vu (11-1)

56
Wrapping Schemes

Overlap

Fully Wrapped “U-wrap” Two sides bonded

57
Effective Strain in FRP

 Maximum strain that can be achieved in the FRP


system at the ultimate load stage
 Governed by the failure mode of the FRP system
and the strengthened member.

ε fe = 0.004 ≤ 0.75ε fu for completely wrapped members (11-6a)

ε fe = κ vε fu ≤ 0.004 for bonded U − wraps or face plies (11-6b)

58
Effective Strain Limitations for FRP
Determination of bond-reduction coefficient κv:

k 1 k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) US
⎛ f ⎞ ' 2/3

468 ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟c
(11-9) US

⎝ 4000 ⎠
k1k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) SI ⎛ ⎞
f c'
2/3
11,900ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (11-9) SI
⎝ 27 ⎠
⎧ d f − Le
⎪ for U wraps
⎪ df
k2 = ⎨ (11-10)
d − 2 Le
⎪ f for two − sides bonded
⎪⎩ d f

59
Effective Strain Limitations for FRP
Determination of active bond length Le:

2500 23 ,300
Le = Le = (11-8) SI
(n t f Ef )
0.58
(11-8) US
(n t f E f )
0.58

Le
60
Effective Strain Limitations for FRP
Determination of bond-reduction coefficient κv:

k 1 k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) US
⎛ f ⎞ ' 2/3

468 ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟c
(11-9) US

⎝ 4000 ⎠
k1k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) SI ⎛ ⎞
f c'
2/3
11,900ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (11-9) SI
⎝ 27 ⎠
⎧ d f − Le
⎪ for U wraps (11-10)
⎪ df
k2 = ⎨
d − 2 Le ε fe = κ vε fu ≤ 0.004
⎪ f for two − sides bonded
⎪⎩ d f

61
Pertinent Shear Dimensions

df sf sf
βα
wf wf
A fv f fe (sin α + cos α )d f
Vf = (11-3)
sf
A fv = 2 nt f w f (11-4)

f fe = ε fe E f (11-5)

62
Design Shear Capacity

φVn = φ (Vc + Vs +ψ f V f ) (11-2)

φVn = φ (Vc + Vs +ψV f )


φ = 0.85 ( ACI 318)
ψ f = 0.95 ( fully wrapped )
ψ f = 0.85 (bonded U − wraps or face plies )

63
Spacing, Reinforcing Limits

d
s f ,max = wf + Section 11.1, Guide:
4

Based on ACI 318-05, Section 11.5.6.9:

Vs + V f ≤ 8 f 'c bw d (11-11) US

Vs + V f ≤ 0.66 f c′bd (11-11) SI

64
Case Study – Precast Garage
Installed FRP “U” Wraps

65
Confinement
Chapter 12, Guide
 Increase in member axial compressive strength
 Enhance the ductility of members subjected to
combined axial and bending forces
 Increase the strength of members subjected to
combined axial and bending forces

66
Axial Compression

 Fibers oriented transverse to the longitudinal


axis of the member
Contribution of any longitudinal fibers to axial
strength is negligible
 Results in an increase in the apparent strength
of the concrete and in the maximum usable
compressive strain in the concrete
 Passive confinement
Intimate contact between FRP system and
member is critical

67
Confinement

Confining
Pressure
FRP Confined Concrete Behavior

Stress
FRP Confined
Concrete
f cc′
εL
εT

f c′ Unconfined
0.85 f c′ Concrete

Transverse ε fu ε fe ε c′ ε cu = 0.003 ε ccu Longitudinal


Strain Strain

Transverse Strain Longitudinal Strain


(Dilation)
69
FRP Confined Concrete

 Strain Limitation
For pure axial loading:
ε fe = κ ε ε fu (12-5)

κ ε = 0.55 Recommended value


(accounts for premature failure strain
of FRP)
For combined axial + bending:
ε fe = 0.004 ≤ κ ε ε fu (12-12)

Limit to maintain shear


Transverse Strain integrity of concrete Longitudinal Strain
(Dilation)
70
Stress FRP Confinement Model

f cc′ FRP Confined


Concrete
E2 ⎧
⎪E ε −
( Ec − E 2 ) 2
2
εc for 0 ≤ ε c ≤ ε t′
fc = ⎨ c c 4 f c′ (12-2a)
f c′ ⎪ f ′+ E ε for ε t′ ≤ ε c ≤ ε ccu
⎩ c 2 c
Unconfined
Concrete
Where,
f cc′ − f c′
E2 = (12-2b)
Ec ε ccu

2 f c′
ε c′ ε t′ ε ccu Strain
ε t′ = (12-2c)
Ec − E 2
Transverse Strain Longitudinal Strain
(Dilation)
71
Stress FRP Confinement Model

f cc′ FRP Confined

f cc′ = f c′ + ψ f 3.3κ a f l
Concrete
E2
(12-3)

f c′ ⎛ ⎛ ε ⎞
0.45

= ε c′ ⎜1.50 + 12κ b l ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎟ (12-6)
f
Unconfined ε ccu fe
Concrete ⎜ f c′ ⎝ ε c′ ⎠ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Where,
Ec
fl is the confining pressure
exerted by the FRP jacket
ε c′ ε t′ ε ccu Strain

κa and κb are shape factors


Transverse Strain Longitudinal Strain
(Dilation)
72
Circular Sections
FRP Jacket

Confining pressure:
fl
2 E f n t f ε fe
fl = (12-4)
D
fl
Ef εfe Ef εfe
Shape factors:
κ a = κ b = 1.0
Concrete

fl
73
Rectangular Sections
Equivalent circular
column

Confining pressure:
2 E f n t f ε fe
fl = (12-4)
D
D2
D = b + h2 b

74
Rectangular Sections

Shape factors:
2
Ae ⎛ b ⎞
κa = ⎜ ⎟ (12-9)
Ac ⎝ h ⎠
Effective confinement
b 0.5
area, Ae Ae ⎛ h ⎞
κb = ⎜ ⎟ (12-10)
Ac ⎝ b ⎠

h
Confining stress
concentrated at corners

75
Rectangular Sections

 Ratio of effective confinement area to total area


of concrete

⎡⎛ b ⎞ ⎛h⎞ 2⎤
⎢⎜ h ⎟(h − 2rc ) + ⎜ b ⎟(b − 2rc ) ⎥
2

⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
1− ⎣ ⎦ −ρ
g
Ae 3 Ag
= (12-11)
Ac 1− ρg

76
Using the Confinement Model

Compressive Strength:
with existing steel spiral reinforcing
φPn = 0.85φ [0.85 f cc' (Ag − Ast ) + f y Ast ] (12-1a)

with existing steel-tie reinforcing:


φPn = 0.80φ [0.85 f cc' (Ag − Ast ) + f y Ast ] (12-1b)

Use the confined concrete


compressive strength in ACI 318
equations

77
Serviceability Considerations-
Axial Compression
Section 12.1.3, Guide:

 To ensure radial cracking will not occur under


service loads,
f c ≤ 0.65 f c '

 To avoid plastic deformation under sustained or


cyclic loads,
f s ≤ 0.60 f y

78
Reinforcement Details
Chapter 13, Guide

 General Guidelines:
Do not turn inside corners;
Provide a minimum 1/2 in. (13 mm) radius when the
sheet is wrapped around outside corners
Provide adequate development length
Provide sufficient overlap when splicing FRP plies.

79
Allowable Termination Points –
Simply Supported Beams
Section 13.1.2, Guide

 Plies should extend a


distance equal at least to ldf
past the point along the
span corresponding to the
cracking moment, Mcr,
 If Vu > 0.67Vc at the
termination point the FRP
laminate should be
anchored with transverse
(“clamping”) reinforcement

80
Bond and Delamination
Transverse (“clamping”) reinfocement

 Area of transverse (“clamping”) FRP U-Wrap


reinforcement to prevent concrete cover layer from
splitting:

(A f f fu )longitudinal
=
(E κ v ε fu )anchor
A f anchor (13-1)

81
Development Length

 The bond capacity of FRP is developed over a critical


length:

nE f t f
ldf =0.057 in in.-lb units
'
f c
(13-2)

nE f t f
ldf = in SI units
'
f c

82
Detailing of NSM bars

 groove dimensions shall be at least 1.5 times the


diameter of the bar
 For a rectangular bar the minimum groove size
shall be 3ab x 1.5bb

83
Development Length of NSM bars

 Development length of NSM bar:

db
ldb = f fd for circular bars (13-3)
4(0.5τ max )

ab d b
ldb = f fd for rectangular bars (13-4)
2(a b +b b )(0.5τ max )

84
QUESTIONS?

Thank You

85
Design Example

Flexural Strengthening of Interior Beam

86
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

12”

24’-0”
DL,wLL

f’c=5000 psi 21.5”


24”
3-#9 bars
fy=60 ksi
2-12”x 23’-0” FRP plies
φMn=266 k-ft
(w/o FRP) FRP
w
ELEVATION SECTION

Manufacturer’s reported FRP-system properties


Thickness per ply, 0.040 in. 1.016 mm
Ultimate tensile strength 90 ksi 0.62 kN/mm2
Rupture strain, 0.015 0.015
Modulus of elasticity of FRP laminates, 5360 ksi 37 kN/mm2

87
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

Loadings and corresponding moments


Loading/Moment Existing loads Anticipated loads
Dead loads,wDL 1.00 k/ft 14 N/mm 1.00 k/ft 14 N/mm
Live load,wLL 1.20 k/ft 17 N/mm 1.80 k/ft 26 N/mm
Unfactored loads,
2.20 k/ft 32.1 N/mm 2.80 k/ft 40.9 N/mm
(wDL + wLL)
Unstrengthened load limit
n/a n/a 2.45 k/ft 34.9 N/mm
(1.1wDL +0.75wLL)
Factored loads,
3.12 k/ft 50.2 N/mm 4.46 k/ft 65.1 N/mm
(1.2wDL +1.6wLL)

Dead-load moment,MDL 72 k-ft 96.2 kN-m 72 k-ft 96.2 kN-m


Live-load moment,MLL 86 k-ft 114.9 kN-m 130 k-ft 173.6 kN-m
Service-load moment,Ms 158 k-ft 211.1 kN-m 202 k-ft 269.8 kN-m
Unstrengthened moment
n/a n/a 177 k-ft 240 kN-m
limit (1.1MDL +0.75MLL)
Factored moment,Mu 224 k-ft 303.6 kN-m -
294.4 k-ft 399.2 kN-m

Two, 12 in. wide by 23 ft. long plies are to be bonded to the soffit of the beam
using the wet-lay-up technique.

88
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 1 - Compute the FRP-system design material properties

For an interior beam, an environmental-reduction


factor (CE ) of 0.95 is suggested.

f fu = C E f fu* f fu = (0.95)(90 ksi) = 85ksi

ε fu = CE ε *fu ε fu = (0.95)(0.0 15in./in.) = 0.0142in./ in.

89
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 2 - Preliminary calculations

Properties of the concrete:


β1 from ACI 318-05, Section 10.2.7.3.

f 'c
β1 = 1.05 − 0.05 = 0.80
1000

Ec = 57,000 5000 psi = 4,030,000 psi

90
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 2 - Preliminary calculations

Properties of existing reinforcing steel:

As = 3(1.00 in. 2 ) = 3.00 in. 2

As 3.00 in. 2
ρs ≡ ρs = = 0.0116
bd (12 in. )(21.5 in. )

91
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 2 - Preliminary calculations

Properties of the externally bonded FRP reinforcement:

A f = nt f w f A f = (2 plies)(0.040 in. ply )(12 in.) = 0.96in.2

Af 0.96 in.2
ρf ≡ ρf = = 0.00372
bd (12 in.)(21.5 in.)

92
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 3 - Determine the existing state of the strain on the soffit

The existing state of strain is calculated assuming


the beam is cracked and the only loads acting on the
beam at the time of the FRP installation are dead
loads. A cracked section analysis of the existing
beam gives k=0.334 and Icr=5937 in.4

M DL (h − kd ) ε bi =
(864 k ⋅ in.)[24 in. − (0.334 )(21.5 in.)]
ε bi =
I cr Ec
(5,937 in.4 )(4,030 ksi )
ε bi = 0.00061

93
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 4 – Determine the design strain of the FRP System

5000 psi
ε fd = 0.083 ≤ 0.9 ε fu
2 (5360000 psi ) (0.04in )

ε fd = 0.0113 ≤ 0.9(0.0142) = 0.0128

94
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 5 - Estimate c, the depth to the neutral axis

A reasonable initial estimate of c is 0.20d. The


value of c is adjusted after checking equilibrium.

c = 0.20d c = (0.20)(21.5 in.) = 4.30 in.

95
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 6 - Determine the effective level of strain in the FRP reinforcement

⎛df −c⎞
ε fe = 0.003 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd
⎝ c ⎠

⎛ 24 − 4.3 ⎞
ε fe = 0.003 ⎜ ⎟ − 0.00061 ≤ 0.009
⎝ 4 . 3 ⎠

ε fe = 0.0131 ≤ 0.009

ε fe = 0.009

96
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

Since FRP controls the section failure, the concrete strain is


less than 0.003:

⎛ c ⎞
ε c = (ε f e + ε bi ) ⎜ ⎟
⎜d −c⎟
⎝ f ⎠

⎛ 4 .3 ⎞
ε c = (0.009 + 0.00061) ⎜ ⎟ = 0.0021
⎝ 24 − 4.3 ⎠

97
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 7 - Calculate the strain in the existing reinforcing steel

⎛ d −c ⎞
ε s = (ε fe + ε bi ) ⎜⎜ ⎟

⎝ d f − c ⎠

⎛ 21.5 − 4.30 ⎞
ε s = (0.009 + 0.00061) ⎜ ⎟ = 0.0084
⎝ 24 − 4.30 ⎠

98
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 8 - Calculate the stress level in the reinforcing steel and FRP

f s = (29,000 ksi)(0.0084) ≤ 60 ksi


f s = Es ε s ≤ f y
f s = 348 ksi ≤ 60 ksi

f fe = E f ε fe f fe = (5,360 ksi )(0.009 ) = 48.2 ksi

99
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 9a - Calculate the internal force resultants

Approximate stress block factors may be calculated using the


parabolic stress-strain relationship of concrete as follows:

1.7 f c' 1.7 (5,000)


ε =
'
= = 0.0021
4,030 ×10
c 6
Ec

4ε c' − ε c 4(0.0021) − 0.0021


β1 = ' = = 0.749
6ε c − 2ε c 6(0.0021) − 2(0.0021)

3ε c' ε c − ε c2 3(0.0021) (0.0021)


α1 = = = 0.886
3γε c '2
3(0.749) (0.0021) 2

100
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 9b – Check equilibrium

Force equilibrium is verified by checking the initial estimate of the


neutral axis, c

As f s + A f A fe (3)(60) + (0.96)(48.2)
c= = = 5.87in
α f c'cβ1 b
1 (0.886)(5)(0.749)(12)

c = 5.87in ≠ 4.30in NG

101
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 10 – Iterate on c until force equilibrium is satisfied


c = 5.17 in.
ε s = 0.0083
c=
(3.00 in. )(60 ksi) + (0.96 in. )(48.2 ksi)
2 2

f s = f y = 60 ksi (0.928)(5 ksi)(0.786)(12 in.)


ε fd = 0.009
f fe = 49.8 ksi c = 5.17 in. = OK .
ε c = 0.0027
β1 = 0.786 The value of c selected for
α = 0.928
1
the final iteration is correct.

102
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 11 – Calculate reinforcement and FRP contribution to strength

⎛ β1c ⎞ ⎛ 0.786(5.17) ⎞
M ns = As f s ⎜ d − ⎟ = (3.00)(60)⎜ 21.5 − ⎟ = 3,504k − in = 292k − ft
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠

⎛ β c⎞ ⎛ 0.786(5.17) ⎞
M sf = A f f fe ⎜ d f − 1 ⎟ = (0.96)(48.2)⎜ 24 − ⎟ = 1,017 k − in = 85 k − ft
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠

103
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 11 – Calculate design flexural strength of the section


The flexural strength is calculated using the reduction factor.
Since εs =0.0083>0.005, the value of Ф is 0.9

φ M n = φ [M ns + ψ M nf ]= 0.9(292 + 0.85(85) ) = 327 k − ft

φ M n = 327 k − ft ≥ M u = 294 k − ft

The strengthened section is capable of sustaining


the new required moment strength

104
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 12 – Check service stresses in the reinforcing steel and the FRP

Calculate the elastic depth to the cracked neutral


axis by summing the first moment of the areas of the
transformed section.

105
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 13 – Check service stresses in the reinforcing steel and the FRP

2
⎛ Es Ef ⎞ ⎛ Es E f ⎛ h ⎞ ⎞ ⎛ Es Ef ⎞
k = ⎜⎜ ρ s + ρf ⎟⎟ + 2⎜⎜ ρ s + ρf ⎜ ⎟ ⎟⎟ − ⎜⎜ ρ s + ρf ⎟⎟
⎝ Ec Ec ⎠ ⎝ Ec Ec ⎝ d ⎠ ⎠ ⎝ Ec Ec ⎠

k = 0.343

kd = (0.343)(21.5 in.) = 7.37 in.

106
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 13 – Check service stresses in the reinforcing steel and the FRP

Calculate the stress level in the reinforcing steel:


⎡ ⎛ kd ⎞⎤
M
⎢ s + ε A
bi f E f ⎜ h − ⎟⎥ (d − kd )Es
⎣ ⎝ 3 ⎠⎦
f s,s = ≤ 0. 8 f y
As Es ⎜ d − ⎟(d − kd ) + A f E f ⎜ d f − ⎟(d f − kd )
⎛ kd ⎞ ⎛ kd ⎞
⎝ 3 ⎠ ⎝ 3 ⎠

f s , s = 40.4 ksi ≤ (0.80)(60 ksi ) = 48 ksi OK

The stress level in the reinforcing steel is within the recommended limit

107
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 14 – Check creep rupture limit t service for the FRP

Calculate the stress level in the FRP:

⎛ Ef ⎞⎛ d f − kd ⎞
f f ,s = f s , s ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ − ε bi E f ≤ 0.55 f fu
⎝ Es ⎠⎝ d − kd ⎠

f f , s = 5.60 ksi ≤ (0.55)(85) = 50 ksi OK

108
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam

• Step 14 – Detailing Requirements

Detail the FRP reinforcement as follow:

1. Check that shear force at termination is less than shear force


that causes end-peeling (estimate as 2/3 of concrete shear
strength).
2. Terminate FRP at ldf (per Eq. 12.2) past cracking moment.
a) If shear force is higher extend FRP beyond and/or use
FRP U-wraps.

109

You might also like