Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Sarah Witt
Fyfe Company
November 7, 2008
1
GUIDE FOR THE DESIGN AND
CONSTRUCTION OF EXTERNALLY
BONDED FRP SYSTEMS FOR
STRENGTHENING CONCRETE
STRUCTURES
2
Outline
Strengthening Concrete Structures
Reasons for strengthening
Types of FRP strengthening systems
Materials and properties of FRP strengthening systems
Substrate Preparation/FRP Application
Repair
Proper detailing and installation methods
Quality control
Design Principles
Strengthening limits
Flexural strengthening
Shear strengthening
Axial strengthening
Reinforcement Details
Bond and delamination
Detailing of laps and splices
Design Examples and Case Studies
3
Reasons for Strengthening
Change in use
Construction or design defects
Code changes
Seismic retrofit
Deterioration
4
Excessive Loading
5
Flexural Cracking
6
Overloading
7
Seismic Loads
8
Improper Steel Placement
9
Impact Damage
10
Typical FRP Systems for
Strengthening Structures
Section 3.2, Guide: Wet lay-up systems
Unidirectional fiber sheets
Multidirectional fiber sheets
Mechanically applied fiber tows
Prepreg systems
Unidirectional fiber sheets
Multidirectional fiber sheets
Mechanically applied fiber tows
Precured systems
Unidirectional laminates
Multidirectional grids
Shell elements
Other forms not covered
11
Typical FRP Systems for
Strengthening Structures
12
Typical FRP Systems for
Strengthening Structures
13
Typical Fiber Properties
Carbon
Aramid
E-Glass
14
Substrate Preparation / Repair
Bond vs. Contact Critical
Contact Critical
Requires intimate contact between the FRP
System and the concrete
c Confinement of columns
Bond Critical
Requires an adhesive bond between the FRP
system and the concrete
c Beam, slab and wall strengthening
15
Substrate Preparation / Repair
Section 6.4, Guide:
Substrate issues:
c ACI 503
c ICRI 03730
16
Substrate Preparation
Section 6.4, Guide:
17
Epoxy Injection
Section 6.4, Guide:
Cracks wider than
0.010 in (0.3 mm)
should be injected
prior to application
of the FRP system.
ACI 224.1
Smaller cracks in
aggressive
environments may
require sealing
18
Quality Control & Assurance
During-construction:
Bond testing
ACI 503R
ASTM D4541
Tension adhesion strengths
should exceed 200 psi (1.4 MPa),
exhibit failure of the concrete substrate.
Cured thickness
Extract small core samples less than 0.5 in (13 mm)
diameter
Avoid sampling in high stress areas if possible
Repair using overlapping sheets on filled core.
19
Quality Control & Assurance
Post-construction:
General Acceptance Criteria for Delaminations
Wet Layup
c Delaminations less than 2 in2 (1300 mm2) each are permissible:
¡ No more than 10 delaminations per 10 ft2 of laminate area
¡ Total delamination area less than 5% of total laminate area
c Delaminations less than 25 in2 (16,000 mm2) may be repaired by resin
injection or ply replacement, depending upon the size, number and
location of delaminations.
c Delaminations greater than 25 in2 (16,000 mm2) should be repaired
by selectively cutting away the affected sheet and applying an
overlapping sheet patch of equivalent plies.
Precured systems
c Each delamination must be inspected and repaired in accordance with
the engineer’s direction
20
Design Guidelines
21
FRP Strengthening Applications
Flexural Strengthening
Beams, Slabs, Walls, etc.
Shear Strengthening
Beams, Columns, Walls, etc.
Axial Enhancement
Column Wrapping, Pressure Vessels
22
Strengthening Limits
Section 9.2, Guide:
23
Structural Fire Endurance
24
Rational Fire Endurance Check
ACI 216R:
Given cover and fire endurance requirement
Find the temperature of the steel & concrete
Find a reduced steel & concrete material
strength
Find the associated reduced section strength
Reduced strength > Unfactored demand
No phi factors or load factors
25
Rational Fire Endurance Check
Section 9.2.1, Guide:
From ACI 216R - Reduce material strengths at elevated
temperature:
Steel: f y → f yθ
Concrete: f 'c → f 'cθ
FRP: f fu → 0 *
26
Maximum Service Temperature
Section 1.3.3, Guide:
Typical glass transition temperature (Tg) for epoxy 140 -
27
Flexural Strengthening
Chapter 10, Guide
φM n > M u (10-1)
28
Assumptions
Section 10.2.1, Guide:
29
Verification of Shear Capacity
Section 10.2.1, Guide:
30
Failure Modes
Section 10.1.1, Guide:
31
Effective Strain in FRP
600
Rupture Strain
500
400
Stress (ksi)
Effective Strain
300
200
100
0
0 0.005 0.01 0.015 0.02
Strain (in/in)
32
Limitation on Strain in FRP
To prevent debonding in regions away from FRP Termination
f c' (10-2) US
ε fd = 0.083 ≤ 0.9 ε fu
nE f t f
f c'
ε fd = 0.41 ≤ 0.9 ε fu
nE f t f (10-2) SI
⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd (10-3)
⎝ c ⎠
33
Calculation Procedure
Determine initial strain in substrate
No Estimated c = Yes
c for Equilibrium?
34
Estimate the Neutral Axis Depth
No closed form
solution exists εc
Must find depth to the
neutral axis by trial c
and error
As a starting point, a
good rule of thumb is
20% of the effective εs
section depth
εfe εbi
c ≈ 0.20 d εb
35
Determine Mode of Failure
⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd (10-3)
⎝ c ⎠
⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd Concrete Crushing Controls
⎝ c ⎠
⎛h−c⎞
ε fe = ε cu ⎜ ⎟ − ε bi ≥ ε fd FRP Rupture Controls
⎝ c ⎠
36
Concrete Stress Block
37
Concrete Stress Block
εc < 0.003 β1 = 2 −
[
4 (ε c ε c′ ) − tan −1 (ε c ε c′ ) ]
(
(ε c ε c′ ) ln 1 + ε c2 ε c′2 )
γ=
(
0.90ln 1 + ε c2 ε′c2 )
γf'c β1ε c ε′c
β1c 1.71f c′
ε′c =
Ec
38
Calculation of Flexural Strain
Assume strain
compatibility εc
Based on failure mode
c
Calculate the strain in each
material by similar
triangles
εs
⎛ d −c ⎞ εfe εbi
ε s = (ε fe + ε bi ) ⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟
(10-10)
εb
d
⎝ f − c ⎠
39
Calculation Of Stress
Stress
FRP
f s = Esε s ≤ f y (10-11)
FRP – Elastic:
f fe = Esε fe (10-9)
Steel
Strain
40
Check Force Equilibrium
Sum forces in the horizontal
direction
If forces do not equilibrate,
revise “c” α1 f
'c
Repeat previous steps β1c
As f s + A f f fe
cest =
β1α 1 f c′ b Asfs
Afff
41
Ultimate Strength Model
εc
c
εs fs
⎛ β1c ⎞ ⎛ β1c ⎞
M n = As f s ⎜ d − ⎟ + ψ f A f f fe ⎜ h − ⎟ (10-13)
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
42
Loss in Ductility
φ ≈0.75ρb
ACI 318 :
A section with lower 0.90
ductility should ρb
compensate with a
0.65
higher reserve of
strength
⎡ ⎛ β1c ⎞ ⎛ β1c ⎞⎤
φM n = φ ⎢ As f s ⎜ d − ⎟ +ψA f f fe ⎜ h − ⎟⎥ (10-13)
⎣ ⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠⎦
Reduction factor for FRP contribution: ψ = 0.85
φM n > M u (10-1)
44
Serviceability
At service, stress in steel should be limited to 80% of
yield strength:
Mu
FRP Strengthened
Moment
My
Ms Unstrengthened
f s , s ≤ .80 f y (10-6)
Curvature
45
Prestressed Concrete Members
Assumptions
46
Prestressed Concrete Members
Failure Modes
47
Prestressed Concrete Members
Strength Reduction Factor
48
Prestressed Concrete Members
Serviceability
f ps , s ≤ 0.82 f py (10-20a)
f ps , s ≤ 0.74 f pu (10-20b)
49
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength
50
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength
P ⎛ e2 ⎞
Strain in the tendon ε ps = ε pe + e ⎜⎜1 + 2 ⎟⎟ + ε pnet ≤ 0.035 (10-22)
Ac Ec ⎝ r ⎠
51
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength
The value of enet depends on the mode of failure
⎛ dp −c ⎞
ε pnet ≤ 0.003 ⎜⎜ ⎟ (10-23a)
concrete crushing
c ⎟
⎝ ⎠
⎛ dP − c ⎞
FRP rupture or
ε pnet ≤ (ε fe + ε bi )⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟ (10-23b)
debonding
d
⎝ f − c ⎠
52
Prestressed Concrete Members
Nominal Strength
Ap f ps + A f f fe
c= (10-25)
α f β1b
1 c
'
53
Case Study – Slab Upgrade
54
Case Study – Slab Upgrade
Positive moment
upgrade to
column strip
55
Shear Strengthening
Chapter 11, Guide
Increase shear capacity of beams or columns
Amount of increase depends on section geometry,
existing reinforcement, and a variety of additional
factors.
Change failure mode to flexural
Typically results in a more ductile failure
56
Wrapping Schemes
Overlap
57
Effective Strain in FRP
58
Effective Strain Limitations for FRP
Determination of bond-reduction coefficient κv:
k 1 k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) US
⎛ f ⎞ ' 2/3
468 ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟c
(11-9) US
⎟
⎝ 4000 ⎠
k1k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) SI ⎛ ⎞
f c'
2/3
11,900ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (11-9) SI
⎝ 27 ⎠
⎧ d f − Le
⎪ for U wraps
⎪ df
k2 = ⎨ (11-10)
d − 2 Le
⎪ f for two − sides bonded
⎪⎩ d f
59
Effective Strain Limitations for FRP
Determination of active bond length Le:
2500 23 ,300
Le = Le = (11-8) SI
(n t f Ef )
0.58
(11-8) US
(n t f E f )
0.58
Le
60
Effective Strain Limitations for FRP
Determination of bond-reduction coefficient κv:
k 1 k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) US
⎛ f ⎞ ' 2/3
468 ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟c
(11-9) US
⎟
⎝ 4000 ⎠
k1k 2 Le
κv = ≤ 0.75 (11-7) SI ⎛ ⎞
f c'
2/3
11,900ε fu k 1 = ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ (11-9) SI
⎝ 27 ⎠
⎧ d f − Le
⎪ for U wraps (11-10)
⎪ df
k2 = ⎨
d − 2 Le ε fe = κ vε fu ≤ 0.004
⎪ f for two − sides bonded
⎪⎩ d f
61
Pertinent Shear Dimensions
df sf sf
βα
wf wf
A fv f fe (sin α + cos α )d f
Vf = (11-3)
sf
A fv = 2 nt f w f (11-4)
f fe = ε fe E f (11-5)
62
Design Shear Capacity
63
Spacing, Reinforcing Limits
d
s f ,max = wf + Section 11.1, Guide:
4
Vs + V f ≤ 8 f 'c bw d (11-11) US
64
Case Study – Precast Garage
Installed FRP “U” Wraps
65
Confinement
Chapter 12, Guide
Increase in member axial compressive strength
Enhance the ductility of members subjected to
combined axial and bending forces
Increase the strength of members subjected to
combined axial and bending forces
66
Axial Compression
67
Confinement
Confining
Pressure
FRP Confined Concrete Behavior
Stress
FRP Confined
Concrete
f cc′
εL
εT
f c′ Unconfined
0.85 f c′ Concrete
Strain Limitation
For pure axial loading:
ε fe = κ ε ε fu (12-5)
2 f c′
ε c′ ε t′ ε ccu Strain
ε t′ = (12-2c)
Ec − E 2
Transverse Strain Longitudinal Strain
(Dilation)
71
Stress FRP Confinement Model
f cc′ = f c′ + ψ f 3.3κ a f l
Concrete
E2
(12-3)
f c′ ⎛ ⎛ ε ⎞
0.45
⎞
= ε c′ ⎜1.50 + 12κ b l ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ ⎟ (12-6)
f
Unconfined ε ccu fe
Concrete ⎜ f c′ ⎝ ε c′ ⎠ ⎟
⎝ ⎠
Where,
Ec
fl is the confining pressure
exerted by the FRP jacket
ε c′ ε t′ ε ccu Strain
Confining pressure:
fl
2 E f n t f ε fe
fl = (12-4)
D
fl
Ef εfe Ef εfe
Shape factors:
κ a = κ b = 1.0
Concrete
fl
73
Rectangular Sections
Equivalent circular
column
Confining pressure:
2 E f n t f ε fe
fl = (12-4)
D
D2
D = b + h2 b
74
Rectangular Sections
Shape factors:
2
Ae ⎛ b ⎞
κa = ⎜ ⎟ (12-9)
Ac ⎝ h ⎠
Effective confinement
b 0.5
area, Ae Ae ⎛ h ⎞
κb = ⎜ ⎟ (12-10)
Ac ⎝ b ⎠
h
Confining stress
concentrated at corners
75
Rectangular Sections
⎡⎛ b ⎞ ⎛h⎞ 2⎤
⎢⎜ h ⎟(h − 2rc ) + ⎜ b ⎟(b − 2rc ) ⎥
2
⎝ ⎠ ⎝ ⎠
1− ⎣ ⎦ −ρ
g
Ae 3 Ag
= (12-11)
Ac 1− ρg
76
Using the Confinement Model
Compressive Strength:
with existing steel spiral reinforcing
φPn = 0.85φ [0.85 f cc' (Ag − Ast ) + f y Ast ] (12-1a)
77
Serviceability Considerations-
Axial Compression
Section 12.1.3, Guide:
78
Reinforcement Details
Chapter 13, Guide
General Guidelines:
Do not turn inside corners;
Provide a minimum 1/2 in. (13 mm) radius when the
sheet is wrapped around outside corners
Provide adequate development length
Provide sufficient overlap when splicing FRP plies.
79
Allowable Termination Points –
Simply Supported Beams
Section 13.1.2, Guide
80
Bond and Delamination
Transverse (“clamping”) reinfocement
(A f f fu )longitudinal
=
(E κ v ε fu )anchor
A f anchor (13-1)
81
Development Length
nE f t f
ldf =0.057 in in.-lb units
'
f c
(13-2)
nE f t f
ldf = in SI units
'
f c
82
Detailing of NSM bars
83
Development Length of NSM bars
db
ldb = f fd for circular bars (13-3)
4(0.5τ max )
ab d b
ldb = f fd for rectangular bars (13-4)
2(a b +b b )(0.5τ max )
84
QUESTIONS?
Thank You
85
Design Example
86
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
12”
24’-0”
DL,wLL
87
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
Two, 12 in. wide by 23 ft. long plies are to be bonded to the soffit of the beam
using the wet-lay-up technique.
88
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
89
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
f 'c
β1 = 1.05 − 0.05 = 0.80
1000
90
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
As 3.00 in. 2
ρs ≡ ρs = = 0.0116
bd (12 in. )(21.5 in. )
91
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
Af 0.96 in.2
ρf ≡ ρf = = 0.00372
bd (12 in.)(21.5 in.)
92
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
M DL (h − kd ) ε bi =
(864 k ⋅ in.)[24 in. − (0.334 )(21.5 in.)]
ε bi =
I cr Ec
(5,937 in.4 )(4,030 ksi )
ε bi = 0.00061
93
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
5000 psi
ε fd = 0.083 ≤ 0.9 ε fu
2 (5360000 psi ) (0.04in )
94
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
95
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
⎛df −c⎞
ε fe = 0.003 ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ − ε bi ≤ ε fd
⎝ c ⎠
⎛ 24 − 4.3 ⎞
ε fe = 0.003 ⎜ ⎟ − 0.00061 ≤ 0.009
⎝ 4 . 3 ⎠
ε fe = 0.0131 ≤ 0.009
ε fe = 0.009
96
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
⎛ c ⎞
ε c = (ε f e + ε bi ) ⎜ ⎟
⎜d −c⎟
⎝ f ⎠
⎛ 4 .3 ⎞
ε c = (0.009 + 0.00061) ⎜ ⎟ = 0.0021
⎝ 24 − 4.3 ⎠
97
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
⎛ d −c ⎞
ε s = (ε fe + ε bi ) ⎜⎜ ⎟
⎟
⎝ d f − c ⎠
⎛ 21.5 − 4.30 ⎞
ε s = (0.009 + 0.00061) ⎜ ⎟ = 0.0084
⎝ 24 − 4.30 ⎠
98
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
• Step 8 - Calculate the stress level in the reinforcing steel and FRP
99
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
100
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
As f s + A f A fe (3)(60) + (0.96)(48.2)
c= = = 5.87in
α f c'cβ1 b
1 (0.886)(5)(0.749)(12)
c = 5.87in ≠ 4.30in NG
101
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
102
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
⎛ β1c ⎞ ⎛ 0.786(5.17) ⎞
M ns = As f s ⎜ d − ⎟ = (3.00)(60)⎜ 21.5 − ⎟ = 3,504k − in = 292k − ft
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
⎛ β c⎞ ⎛ 0.786(5.17) ⎞
M sf = A f f fe ⎜ d f − 1 ⎟ = (0.96)(48.2)⎜ 24 − ⎟ = 1,017 k − in = 85 k − ft
⎝ 2 ⎠ ⎝ 2 ⎠
103
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
φ M n = 327 k − ft ≥ M u = 294 k − ft
104
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
• Step 12 – Check service stresses in the reinforcing steel and the FRP
105
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
• Step 13 – Check service stresses in the reinforcing steel and the FRP
2
⎛ Es Ef ⎞ ⎛ Es E f ⎛ h ⎞ ⎞ ⎛ Es Ef ⎞
k = ⎜⎜ ρ s + ρf ⎟⎟ + 2⎜⎜ ρ s + ρf ⎜ ⎟ ⎟⎟ − ⎜⎜ ρ s + ρf ⎟⎟
⎝ Ec Ec ⎠ ⎝ Ec Ec ⎝ d ⎠ ⎠ ⎝ Ec Ec ⎠
k = 0.343
106
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
• Step 13 – Check service stresses in the reinforcing steel and the FRP
The stress level in the reinforcing steel is within the recommended limit
107
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
⎛ Ef ⎞⎛ d f − kd ⎞
f f ,s = f s , s ⎜⎜ ⎟⎟⎜⎜ ⎟⎟ − ε bi E f ≤ 0.55 f fu
⎝ Es ⎠⎝ d − kd ⎠
108
Design Example: Flexural Strengthening of an Interior Beam
109