Professional Documents
Culture Documents
This analysis project covers measures 1-42 of the Menuetto movement of Schubert’s Sonata
in C Minor (D958). This passage is in a rounded continuous binary form: rounded due to the
return of the A material after the B section, and continuous because the initial A section does not
The initial A section of the piece consists of twelve measures and approximately dived into
three harmonic areas. The first four measures are in the initial key of C minor. In measure 5, the
piece enters A flat major via a deceptive cadence from the preceding measure (A flat major being
the VI of C minor). Upon reaching measure 8, Schubert begins using a series of pivot chords to
modulate into E flat major, the III of the original C minor and harmonic destination of this
section. This section can therefore be characterized by overarching harmonic motion from i to III
by moving through VI. It is also worth noting that this section appears to be a singular phrase.
Although dominant harmony does appear, it typically does so in either a passing or inverted (and
therefore weakened) fashion. It is not until the end of the A section that Schubert provides a
perfect authentic cadence in E flat major. In order to subvert the conclusory feeling that comes
with perfect authentic cadences, Schubert connects the end of this phrase to the beginning of the
next via an ascending arpeggiation. Regarding the Schenkerian analysis of this section, it appears
The B section, beginning in measure 14 and concluding in measure 29, is entirely in the
key of E flat major. This section also appears as a single, continuous phrase due to the avoidance
of a perfect authentic cadence. When transitioning to the return of the A section, an imperfect
Douglas Osmun
authentic cadence is used. Also worth mentioning is that this B to A transition consists of elided
The returning A material is the most peculiar section of this excerpt. The imperfect
authentic cadence leading from the B section into the A section also places the material
harmonically back into C minor. However, this section divided into three, four bar phrases not
due to any harmonic motion, but rather due to two separate, measure long rests. Each phrase is
prolongation of i, the second as motion from VI to iv, and the third as cadential motion from i to
V to i. What is particularly interesting about this is the symmetrical construction that is apparent
when comparing this returning A section to the original A section. As stated previously, the initial
A section moves harmonically from i to VI to III. This is strikingly similar to the motion from i to
VI to i in the returning A material. Although the initial instance consists of motion through key
areas and the second instance consists of motion through chords within a single key area, this
musical similarity is too striking to ignore, especially due to three groupings of four bars assigned
The musical distinction between the sections of the piece lays primarily in the gestural
motives. The initial A section is characterized by a recurring four bar rhythmic pattern in the right
hand and a continuous stream of arpeggiating eighth notes in the left hand. The concluding A
section incorporates the same recurring four bar rhythmic pattern. However, Schubert has here
placed that pattern in the left hand. In the right hand is now the continuous stream of eighth
notes, initially scalar in design but concluding in an arpeggiating manner. The B section is an
interesting contrast to the ideas contained within A specifically because B is constructed from of a
Douglas Osmun
stratified version of those same materials. The rhythmic pattern and arpeggiating eighth notes are
still present, but instead of being divided between the hands, the are now presented separately in
time. The hands in rhythmic and gestural unison, Schubert alternates between blocked chordal
In conducting the Schenkerian analysis of the excerpt, the initial problem I ran into was
the identification of scale degree 4. The opening A section entirely being a prolongation of scale
degree 5, I anticipated finding 4 somewhere within the B or concluding A section. There appeared
to be only one suitable candidate: the F that appears in the right hand in measure 16. I did not
find this to be ideal initially due to the fact that it is presented in an inner voice. However, if the
prior material is treated as the excitement of an inner voice in order to make it into an outer voice,
I believe this F (supported by dominant harmony) is a good option for scale degree 4. The
remainder of the B section then functions as a prolongation of 4. Regarding the other elements of
the urlinie, the initial A section is essentially a prolongation of scale degree 5. The returning A
section is a prolongation of scale degree 3, and the scale degrees 2 and 1 are given with the
level, the bass motion consists entirely of tonic arpeggiation. I could not find any acceptable
predominant bass motion on this level, as the excerpt concludes with direct i-V-i motion. There is
an argument that could likely be made for the F in measure 37 (supported by iv) serve a deeper
predominant function, but I did not opt to analyze it this way specifically because it is proceeded by
tonic harmony before the concluding perfect authentic cadence. Therefore, from section A
Douglas Osmun
through section B, the bass motion is a descending arpeggiation of 1-5-3-1. Beginning with the
One final element I would like to point out is a linear progression that appears present
beginning at measure 39. Quite near the end of the piece, and having already received scale degrees
5, 4, and 3, Schubert appears to give us scale degrees 5, 4, and 3 one more time in rapid succession.
5 is supported by the tonic harmony on the downbeat of measure 39, 4 appears in the passing
dominant harmony on the second beat of the measure, and 3 appears in the tonic harmony on beat
three. To describe this, I feel it necessary to invoke the term “interruption.” As a disclaimer, I do
not mean this in the same sense of the way we have used it in class (which I understand to be a
harmonic break that forces a return to a previous scale degree, such as a half cadence). Is this
excerpt, the interruption instead appears to be rhythmic rather than harmonic due to the measure
long rest immediately preceding this linear progression. Because these are the concluding four bars
of the excerpt, I found it quite satisfying that—beginning out of the stasis provided by the rest—I
could hear a condensed, rapid progression all the way from scale degree 5 to 1. Although scale
degrees 2 and 1 function on the deeper, ursatz level, they elide nicely with the motion initated two