Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Amino Acids
Karlheinz Drauz, Degussa AG, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany
Ian Grayson, Degussa, Middlesbrough, United Kingdom
Axel Kleemann, Hanau, Germany
Hans-Peter Krimmer, Degussa AG, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany
Wolfgang Leuchtenberger, Degussa AG, Düsseldorf, Germany
Christoph Weckbecker, Degussa AG, Hanau-Wolfgang, Germany
1. Introduction and History acids, because they are by far the most widely
distributed in nature and are of considerable eco-
The proteins, although they occur in an almost nomic interest.
infinite variety, are composed of a relatively The ca. 20 different α-amino acids found
small number of basic building blocks, all α- in proteins are simple organic compounds, in
amino acids. In addition, the amino acids fulfill which an amino group and a side chain (R)
certain regulatory functions in the metabolism are attached alpha to the carboxyl function. The
and are required for the biosynthesis of other R group may be aliphatic, aromatic, or hetero-
functional structures. This review is limited, cyclic and may possess further functionality.
for the most part, to the protein-forming amino
Dipeptide 2. Properties
2.1. Physical Properties and Structure
exhibit additional pK values. Amino acids act as cycles [19]. The chiral α-amino acids and their
buffers in the region of their pK values. derivatives are inexpensive and, for the most
part, readily available synthons for numerous
natural products and pharmaceuticals. In many
cases optically active amino acids can also be
used to induce chirality during the course of a
synthetic process [20].
α-Amino acids form chelate-like complexes
with heavy metal ions. The best known are the
dark blue, easily crystallized copper chelates:
α-Amino acids have found use as organocat- with anhydrous alcohol in the presence of anhy-
alysts for asymmetric organic reactions, for ex- drous hydrogen chloride. The initial product is
ample asymmetric versions of the aldol or the the hydrochloride of the ester, which is liberated
Mannich reactions [21]. The amino acids most by addition of base. On standing or warming,
often employed are l- or d-proline, their deriva- the free esters of α-amino acids can eliminate
tives, or short-chain peptides based on proline. alcohol to form 2,5-diketopiperazines:
Oxidizing agents attack the amino group,
converting the amino acid into an iminocarbox-
ylic acid. These are unstable and either hydro-
lyze to α-oxocarboxylic acids or decompose, af-
ter decarboxylation, into ammonia and the alde-
hyde containing one carbon atom less. Dike- Amino acid esters are useful intermediates for
tones, triketones, N-bromosuccinimide, or silver peptide synthesis because the carboxyl function
oxide may serve as the oxidizing agent. The best is protected. The esters may be converted to ami-
known example is the reaction with ninhydrin. no alcohols by treatment with a strong reducing
Oxidative deamination also can be carried out agent, such as lithium aluminum hydride.
enzymatically with d- or l-amino acid oxidases. Several cyclic derivatives of the α-amino
This also proceeds via the α-iminocarboxylic acids are of industrial importance. The hydan-
acids, which subsequently are hydrolyzed to α- toins or imidazolidine-2,4-diones, which have
oxo acids: been used as intermediates in the synthesis of
α-amino acids, are most conveniently prepared
by treatment of aldehyde cyanohydrins with am-
monium carbonate or urea. They also may be
obtained by reacting amino acids with cyanates
or isocyanates, the reaction proceeding via the
ureidocarboxylic acid (hydantoic acid deriva-
tive):
This enantioselective enzymatic oxidative
deamination is the basis of analytical methods
for the determination of amino acid enantiomers.
The N-acylation of α-amino acids with
acyl chlorides or anhydrides under Schotten-
Baumann conditions produces N-acyl-α-amino
acids, which have numerous uses. For exam-
ple, the N-acetyl derivatives of d,l-amino acids
(e.g., alanine, valine, methionine, phenylala-
nine, tryptophan) are intermediates in the pro-
duction of l-amino acids by enzymatic resolu-
tion using aminoacylases (see Section 3.1). The thiohydantoins are obtained by the reaction
Amino acids acylated with naturally occur- with isothiocyanates.
ring fatty acid residues are used industrially as Dehydration of N-acylamino acids with
biodegradable surfactants. acetic anhydride or carbodiimide yields 1,3-
If free amino acids are heated above 200 ◦ C, oxazolin-5-ones (azlactones):
especially in the presence of soda lime or metal
ions, they readily decarboxylate to form amines.
The enzymatic decarboxylation of amino acids
gives biogenic amines. Some of these amines are
physiologically active neurotransmitters (his-
tamine, tyramine, dopamine, serotonin).
The esters are usually prepared by direct es- Racemization occurs readily during the reaction.
terification, e.g., reaction of the α-amino acid The azlactones are intermediates in the synthesis
of amino acids.
Amino Acids 7
(3S,4aS,8aS)-Decahydroisoquinolinecar-
boxylic acid [115238-58-9], decahydroiso-
quinoline-3-carboxylic acid, C10 H17 NO2 , M r
Betaine [107-43-7], carboxymethyl-tri- 183.26, application: Nelfinavir (antiviral) [28].
methyl ammonium betaine, C5 H11 NO2 , M r
117.15, occurrence: sugar beet.
l-3,4-Dihydroxyphenylalanine (DOPA)
[59-92-7], 2-amino-3-(3,4-dihydroxyphe-
nyl)propionic acid, C9 H11 NO4 , M r 197.17,
L-Citrulline [372-75-8], 2-amino-5-
occurrence: Tyr metabolite, faba bean.
ureidopentanoic acid, C6 H13 N3 O3 , M r 175.19,
25
mp 234–237 ◦ C , 222 ◦ C (decomp.), [α]D +
◦
24.2 (c = 2 in 5 M HCl), solubility 10.3 (20 ◦ C)
g/100 g H2 O, pI 5.92, dissociation constants:
pK 1 2.43, pK 2 9.41; occurrence: urea cycle,
watermelon. D-Glutamic acid [6893-26-1], 2-ami-
noglutaric acid, 2-amino-1,4-pentanedioic acid,
d-Glu, C5 H9 NO4 , M r 147.12, application:
Spiroglumide (CCK-B-antagonist) [30].
20 amino acids were believed to be genetically This process is now generally being replaced by
coded, but the recent discoveries of selenocys- other methods, because of customer preference
teine and pyrrolysine have demonstrated that ad- for materials not of animal origin. Some amino
ditional amino acids could be coded by subvert- acids, such as l-tyrosine, can be economically
ing a stop codon. The following sections will isolated from plant residues, for example sugar
focus on production methods for the principal beet molasses.
proteinogenic amino acids, which are of major
importance in nutrition and as feed additives.
derived from mutants obtained by transduc- bilization of the cells in κ-carrageenan, provided
tion, having feedback-insensitive and derepres- remarkably increased operational stability, re-
sive enzymes of arginine biosynthesis and 6- sulting in biocatalyst half-lives of almost two
azauracil resistance, are able to produce 60– years [75]. A column packed with the κ-carra-
100 g/L l-arginine [59]. A small amount of l- geenan-immobilized system allows a theoretical
arginine is isolated from protein hydrolysates. productivity of 140 g L−1 h−1 l-aspartate.
As l-aspartic acid gained importance as in-
termediate for the manufacture of the dipep-
3.2.3. l-Aspartic Acid and Asparagine tide sweetener aspartame (methyl ester of l-
aspartyl-l-phenylalanine) improved processes
L-Aspartic acid is industrially manufac- were developed. For continuous production
tured by an enzymatic process in which as- of l-aspartic acid Escherichia coli strains
partase (l-aspartate ammonia lyase, EC 4.3.1.1) immobilized with polyurethane [76] or with
catalyzes the addition of ammonia to fumaric polyethylenimine and glass fiber support [77]
acid [71]. Advantages of the enzymatic produc- and κ-carrageenan-immobilized Pseudomonas
tion method are higher product concentration putida [78] have been reported and protected,
and productivity and the formation of fewer by- respectively. Less successful was the search for
products. Thus l-aspartic acid can be easily sep- strains that are overproducing l-aspartate by fer-
arated from the reaction mixture by crystalliza- mentation of sugar. A pyruvate kinase-deficient
tion. mutant of Brevibacterium flavum accumulates
A process involving continuous production up to 22.6 g/L l-aspartic acid in glucose-con-
of l-aspartic acid by means of carrier-fixed as- taining medium [79], not enough to be compet-
partase isolated from Escherichia coli was first itive with the enzymatic processes. On the other
commercialized in Japan [72]. An economically hand, genetic recombination techniques have
attractive process for l-aspartic acid uses rest- helped to improve aspartase-containing strains.
ing or dried cells with a high aspartase content, An aspA gene bearing plasmid (pBR322:aspA-
e.g., a 4.5 % suspension of aspartase-containing par) was able to elevate aspartase formation in
Brevibacterium flavum cells could be recycled in Escherichia coli K 12 about 30-fold [80].
seven repeated batches and concentrations up to
166 g/L l-aspartate could be achieved [73]. In L-Asparagine can be isolated as a byproduct
1973, an immobilized cell system based on E. from the production of potato starch. A simple
coli cells entrapped in polyacrylamide gel lat- synthesis of l-asparagine starts from l-aspartic
tice was introduced for large-scale production acid which is esterified to the β-methyl ester fol-
[74]. This example represents the first industrial lowed by treatment with ammonia [81].
application of immobilized microbial cells in a
fixed-bed reactor. Further improvements, immo-
Amino Acids 17
formed from glucose via phosphoenolpyruvate, product is started by biomass separation using
citrate, and of α-ketoglutarate and the other 42 % centrifuges or ultrafiltration units, concentration
via the tricarboxylic acid (TCA) or the glyoxy- of the centrifugate or filtrate, followed by crys-
late cycle [97]. In large-scale production the for- tallization, filtration and drying. A scheme of
mation of trehalose very often reduces the prod- production steps is given in Figure 4.
uct yield. Trehalose consists of two α-1,1 bound
glucose molecules and is excreted by the bacte-
ria as a material with protects the cell against
high osmotic pressure (osmoprotectant). A pro-
cess was recently developed and successfully in-
dustrialized in which trehalose formation is con-
trolled and decreased by culturing the overpro-
ducing mutant in media containing invert sugar
from molasses [98, 99].
Today wild type isolates as well as mutants
developed by classical breeding or even strains
constructed by modern techniques, using cell fu-
sion or recombinant DNA methods [100], are
available for industrial l-glutamate production.
In addition a new type of fermentation process
was reported which uses a strain that overpro-
duces l-glutamic acid and l-lysine simultane-
ously. The cultivation of an auxotrophic regula-
tory mutant of Brevibacterium lactofermentum
in a medium, supplemented with polyoxyeth-
ylenesorbitan monopalmitate as surface-active
agent, resulted in the accumulation of 162 g l-
amino acids per liter (105 g l-lysine · HCl + 57 g
l-glutamic acid). This corresponds to a produc-
tion rate of 3.8 g (l-lysine · HCl + l-glutamic
acid) per liter per hour [101].
The success of an economic production ba-
sically depends on the experience in fermenta-
tion technology, in up- and downstream pro-
cessing and on the skill of employees in re-
search, development, and production. A multi-
step inoculation procedure followed by the fed-
batch mode (→ Biotechnology, Chap. 6.2) in the
main fermentation up to 500 m3 scale is still the
preferred technology for the production of l- Figure 4. Flow diagram of fermentation and downstream
processing of l-glutamic acid
glutamic acid.
Critical operations are the steam-forced ster-
ilization of the fermenter and batchwise or
continuous sterilization of the culture medium 3.2.6. L-Glutamine
to prevent contamination by foreign microbes.
During fermentation the temperature, pH, dis- Microbial l-glutamine producers were selected
solved oxygen, and the sugar consumption have from wild type glutamate-producing coryne-
to be controlled as important process parame- form bacteria. A sulfaguanidine resistant mutant
ters. When the fermentation is completed after of Brevibacterium flavum accumulates 41 g/L l-
40–60 h, the production strain may have accu- glutamine in 48 h from 10 % glucose [102]. A
mulated more than 150 g/L l-glutamic acid. Af- yield of 44 % was achieved by the mutant Bre-
ter deactivation of the broth, the recovery of the vibacterium flavum AJ3409 [60].
Amino Acids 19
dried, and granulated to yield a feed-grade prod- The production method of choice for L-
uct, which contains lysine sulfate. Its lysine con- methionine is still the enzymatic resolution
tent correspond to that of a material which con- of racemic N-acetyl-methionine using acylase
tains to at least 60 % of l-lysine hydrochloride from Aspergillus oryzae. The production is car-
[133, 134]. The process avoids any waste prod- ried out in a continuously operated fixed-bed or
ucts usually present in the conventional l-lysine enzyme membrane reactor [136].
hydrochloride manufacture. Alternatively, l-methionine may be produced
by microbial conversion of the correspond-
ing 5-substituted hydantoin. With growing cells
3.2.12. D,L-Methionine and L-Methionine of Pseudomonas sp. strain NS671, d,l-5-(2-
methylthioethyl)hydantoin was converted to l-
l-Methionine and its antipode d-methionine are methionine; a final concentration of 34 g/L and
of equal nutritive value, thus the racemate can a molar yield of 93 % have been obtained [137].
directly be used as feed additive. Biosynthesis of l-methionine and its regula-
The most economic way for production of tion in bacteria is well known. Although some
d,l-methionine is the chemical process based on promising concepts, for example utilization of
acrolein, methyl mercaptan, hydrogen cyanide, sulfate, sulfite, or thiosulfate as sulfur sources
and ammonium carbonate (see Fig. 5). β- for microbes have been suggested [138], it was
Methylthiopropionaldehyde, formed by addi- not possible so far to develop strains that are able
tion of methyl mercaptan to acrolein, is the in- to excrete remarkable amounts of l-methionine
termediate that reacts with hydrogen cyanide into the culture medium.
to give α-hydroxy-γ-methylthiobutyronitrile.
Treatment with ammonium carbonate leads to
5-(β-methylthioethyl)hydantoin that is saponi- 3.2.13. L-Phenylalanine
fied by potassium carbonate giving d,l-methio-
Several chemical, biocatalytic, and fermentation
nine in up to 95 % yield, calculated on acrolein
methods for producing l-phenylalanine have
[135].
been developed, some of which are of industrial
significance (see Fig. 6).
In previous large-scale production processes
for l-phenylalanine two enzymatic methods
were applied:
1) Resolution of N-acetyl-d,l-phenylalanine by
carrier-fixed microbial acylase: This process
provided pharmaceutical-grade l-phenylala-
nine, but suffered from the disadvantage that
the d-enantiomer had to be racemized and re-
cycled.
2) Stereoselective and enantioselective addition
of ammonia to trans-cinnamic acid, catalyzed
by l-phenylalanine ammonia lyase (PAL,
EC 4.3.1.5): PAL-containing Rhodotorula
rubra was used in an industrial process [139]
to supply l-phenylalanine for the first pro-
duction campaign of the sweetener aspar-
tame. When continuously operated in an im-
mobilized whole cell reactor, the biocon-
version reached concentration up to 50 g/L
l-phenylalanine at a conversion of about
83 % [140]. Other processes started from
Figure 5. Degussa process for production of l-methionine phenylpyruvate with l-aspartic acid as amine
donor using immobilized cells of Escherichia
22 Amino Acids
coli [141] or from α-acetamidocinnamic acid a medium containing 13 % glucose. Similar re-
and immobilized cells of a Corynebacterium sults can be obtained by tyrosine auxotrophic
equi strain [142]. In both cases l-phenylal- regulatory mutants of E. coli [145]. With re-
anine concentrations up to 30 g/L and more combinant DNA techniques it was possible to
(molar yields as high as at least 98 %) were improve overproducing strains of coryneform
reached. bacteria as well as of E. coli. Amplification
of a deregulated DAHPS gene was achieved
However, fermentation processes based on
in a phenylalanine producer of Brevibacterium
glucose-consuming l-phenylalanine overpro-
lactofermentum [146]. For optimal production
ducing mutants of E. coli and coryneform strains
of l-phenylalanine in fed-batch cultivation the
turned out to be more economical. The biosyn-
critical specific glucose uptake rate has to be
thetic pathway for aromatic amino acids in bac-
controlled. The specific feed rate during fer-
teria is strictly regulated [143]. l-Phenylalanine
mentation has to be adjusted below a critical
is formed in ten enzymatic steps starting from
limit, since otherwise the E. coli producer will be
erythrose-4-phosphate and phosphoenolpyru-
forced to excrete acetate [147]. A suitable profile
vate. The biosynthesis is governed by the first
of the specific glucose feed rate prevents acetate
key enzyme 3-deoxy-d-arabinoheptulosonate-
formation and leads to improved l-phenylala-
7-phosphate synthase (DAHPS) which is in-
nine production with a final concentration up
hibited by both l-phenylalanine and l-tyrosine
to 46 g/L and a corresponding yield of 18 %. l-
(by acting on the enzyme itself) and repressed
Phenylalanine is recovered from the fermenta-
by l-tyrosine (by acting on the according gene
tion broth either by two-step crystallization or
of the DNA). The other important enzyme is
by an ion-exchange resin process. The preferred
prephenate dehydratase (PDT) also inhibited by
cell separation technique is ultrafiltration; and
l-phenylalanine, but stimulated by l-tyrosine.
the filtrates may be treated with activated carbon
To overcome these regulatory mechanisms ei-
for further purification. Instead of ion-exchange
ther auxotrophs of Corynebacterium glutam-
resins nonpolar, highly porous synthetic adsor-
icum have been constructed or l-phenylalanine
bents are recommended to remove impurities
analogues, e.g., 4-aminophenylalanine and 4-
[148, 149]. An alternative process in which a
fluorophenylalanine, have been applied. The lat-
cell separator is integrated in the fermentation
ter variant leads to resistant mutants of Brevibac-
pa rt, thus allowing cell recycling, was suggested
terium flavum or lactofermentum [144]. These
for l-phenylalanine production and may lead to
auxotrophic and regulatory mutants are able to
prospective developments [150].
produce more than 20 g/L of l-phenylalanine in
Amino Acids 23
This process has been commercialized for the α-Ketoglutaric acid plays the central role in
enzymatic synthesis of the drug l-DOPA, where the assimilation of ammonia. Its transamination
phenol is replaced by catechol [54]. l-Tyrosine product, glutamic acid, in turn, can provide its
is formed in nature as part of the shikimic acid amino group for the synthesis of other amino
pathway, as are l-phenylalanine and l-trypto- acids, e.g., alanine (Fig. 7).
phan. Recombinant DNA technology has been Humans, animals, and some bacteria are in-
used to develop strains of Corynebacterium glu- capable of synthesizing all the necessary ami-
tamicum that are specific for l-tyrosine, and pro- no acids in their own intermediary metabolism;
duction yields of 20–25 g/L have been obtained i.e., they are heterotrophs and are therefore de-
[175]. pendent on the biosynthetic capability of plants.
Proteins that are consumed as foods by humans
and animals are hydrolyzed to amino acids by
3.2.19. L-Valine the digestive enzymes. The amino acids are re-
l-Valine is produced industrially in pharma- sorbed in the upper part of the intestine and enter
ceutical quality by enzymatic resolution of the liver by way of the portal vein. The liver is the
N-acetyl-d,l-valine. Using direct fermenta- central organ for metabolism and homoeostasis
tion the branched-chained amino l-valine can of the plasma amino-acid level. The body’s var-
be produced by either α-aminobutyric acid- ious requirements are met from the pool of free
resistant mutants of Serratia marcescens or by amino acids (Fig. 8), ca. 50 g in adult humans.
2-thiazolealanine-resistant coryneform strains
[176]. Brevibacterium lactofermentum AJ12341
produces 39 g/L l-valine (28 % yield) [177].
Some amino acids or their metabolites are di- racemization. Orally ingested d-amino acids are
rectly active as hormones or facilitate the trans- resorbed from the intestinal lumen more slowly
mission of nerve impulses (neurotransmitters), than the l-form. The d-enantiomers cannot be
e.g., serotonin. Furthermore, there are amino utilized or can be utilized only to a slight ex-
acids that serve special functions, such as methi- tent as essential amino acids [180]. The one
onine, which is a methyl group donor. Finally, important exception is d-methionine. Animals
a series of amino acids serves as precursors for and adult humans convert d-methionine into l-
the biosynthesis of other structures. For exam- methionine by transamination. The α-keto acid
ple, glycine is used in the construction of the por- of methionine is an intermediate. Otherwise, d-
phyrin skeleton. Amino acids are metabolized to amino acids are degraded with the help of d-ami-
produce energy in the case of a protein-deficient no acid oxidases [181] to be used as an energy
or a protein-excess diet. source [182].
The free amino acids in the amino acid pool The major end products of amino acid
undergo numerous transformations (Fig. 9), in- metabolism are urea, uric acid, ammonium salts,
volving transamination and oxidative deamina- creatinine, and allantoin. The loss of nitrogen via
tion, by which other amino acids can be syn- these metabolites stabilizes at about 22 g protein
thesized. The α-keto acids are intermediates per day after a few days on a protein-free diet.
and in addition allow amino acids entrance into Inborn disorders in amino acid metabolism
the carbohydrate (through pyruvate) and fatty [183] can lead to marked alterations in the ex-
acid (through acetylcoenzyme A) metabolisms. cretion profile. These disorders usually take the
A distinction is therefore drawn between gluco- form of an enzyme or transport deficiency [178,
genic and ketogenic amino acids. 184]. The most common example is phenylke-
tonuria, a disruption of the normal metabolic
pathway from phenylalanine to tyrosine caused
by severe limitation in the activity of the
phenylalanine hydroxylase [185].
Humans and animals are not capable of pro-
ducing all the required l-amino acids in their in-
termediary metabolism. Therefore, they are de-
pendent on an external source of these essential
amino acids (Table 4). In situations of increased
requirements (rapid growth, stress, trauma), his-
tidine and arginine also become essential for hu-
mans. Cysteine and tyrosine may be essential for
infants during their first few weeks, because their
intermediary metabolism does not yet function
well enough to produce these from methionine
and phenylalanine in sufficient quantities.
total market value. In animal nutrition, amino acid requirement figures, is given as 0.55 g/kg
acids are used almost exclusively for their nutri- body weight. The acute daily protein require-
tive value. ment, however, varies between 0.5 and 2.5 g/kg
Addition of small amounts of amino acids to with age and constitution [195]. The Deutsche
improve the nutritive value of proteins is known Gesellschaft für Ernährung (DGE) recommends
as supplementation. Both supplementation and a daily consumption of 0.9 g/kg body weight
the combination of proteins with complemen- [196, 197]. The Committee on Dietary Al-
tary amino acids are used to increase the bio- lowances, Food and Nutrition Board of the Na-
logic value of proteins. Usually the supply of at tional Academy of Sciences (NAS), USA, cites
least one of the essential amino acids lies be- 0.8 g/kg as a desirable level of daily protein con-
low the requirement. This, the limiting amino sumption [198, 199].
acid, determines what percentage of the protein
(or, more precisely, its amino acids) can be used
to meet the body’s amino acid requirements. In 5.1.1. Supplementation
most cases, methionine is the first limiting ami-
no acid. Sometimes it is lysine; now and then it In general, animal protein contains the essential
is both together. amino acids in larger quantities and in a more
The contents of essential amino acids found favorable ratio than vegetable protein, which is
in several animal and vegetable foodstuffs are often deficient in essential amino acids. Lysine
compiled in Table 5. Considerable variations is the first limiting amino acid in wheat, rye, bar-
may be present in the amino acid contents of ley, oats, maize, and millet, whereas methionine
a given foodstuff. is the first limiting amino acid in meat, milk,
The published requirements for the individ- soybeans, and other beans. The second limiting
ual essential amino acids differ. The values (Ta- amino acids are usually threonine (wheat, rice)
ble 6) usually contain safety factors and there- and tryptophan (maize, rice, casein). The limit-
fore are higher than the minimum requirement. ing amino acids for several foodstuffs are listed
Requirement values were first determined by in Table 7.
Rose [192]; those published by Hegsted [193] Improving the biologic value of vegetable
are considered the most reliable at present. The protein in human nutrition is practiced for eco-
amino acid requirement pattern suggested by the nomic and dietary reasons. Combining differ-
FAO/WHO [194] is considered optimal for the ent protein types is not always practical. Often
greatest part of the population. a complementary protein is unavailable, too ex-
The “average safe level of daily protein in- pensive, or not of acceptable taste. In these cases
take for men and women,” based on these amino supplementation with amino acids is the sim-
plest method of increasing the biologic value of
Amino Acids 29
proteins. There is a monumental volume of lit- tein levels, and the protein efficiency is then
erature on the subject of amino acid supplemen- determined using regressional analysis.
tation [200–207]. The net protein retention (NPR) method and
The biologic value is an important criterion the net protein utilization (NPU) method are
for the evaluation of proteins or amino acid mix- more accurate than the PER method because
tures. It can be determined experimentally [208, they consider the protein (NPR) or total nitro-
209]. In principle, all methods measure the abil- gen (NPU) requirement for maintenance. The
ity of the nutritional protein to replace body pro- “chemical score,” in which the availability of
tein. Table 8 lists the biologic values of nutri- the amino acids is not considered, is suitable
tional proteins as determined by the minimum for a gross estimation of the biologic protein
requirement [195]. Whole egg protein is the ref- quality. In this method the amino acid content
erence in this scale. is determined analytically and compared with
the amino acid pattern of a reference protein,
Table 7. Limiting amino acids in foodstuffs e.g., the FAO/WHO provisional scoring pattern
Proteins First limiting Second limiting
(Table 9). This method provides an immediate
amino acid amino acid(s) picture of the size of amino acid gaps and the
Peanut Thr Lys and Met sequence of limiting amino acids.
Fish Met Lys
Casein Met Trp Content of amino acid in test protein
Score = ×100
Torula yeast Met Content of amino acid in reference protein
Sesame Lys
Skim milk Met
Beans Met Table 9. FAO/WHO provisional scoring pattern 1973 [194]
Sunflower seed Lys Thr Amino acid g/100 g protein
Soy protein Met Lys l-Isoleucine 4.0
Wheat Lys Thr l-Leucine 7.0
Rice Lys Thr and Trp l-Lysine 5.5
Rye Lys Thr and Trp l-Methionine + l-cystine * 3.5
Gelatin Trp l-Phenylalanine + l-tyrosine **
6.0
Maize Lys Trp and Thr l-Threonine 4.0
l-Tryptophan 1.0
Another scale of evaluation is the protein effi- l-Valine 5.0
ciency ratio (PER). This is the daily weight gain Total 36.0
* Cys can partly cover the total S-amino acid requirement.
of young animals, usually rats, under standard ** Tyr can partly cover the total aromatic amino acid requirement.
feeding conditions (see Table 8). In an improved
method, the animals are fed diets of various pro- As can be seen in Table 10, addition of ca.
0.1–0.5 % of the limiting amino acid to such ba-
sic foodstuffs as wheat, rice, maize, and soy-
Table 8. Protein quality of food and minimum requirements (human)
Food Biologic Minimum Protein
value requirement * , efficiency
g kg−1 d−1 ratio (rat)
[195] [195] [190]
Whole egg 100 35 3.92
Beef 92 39 2.30
Cow’s milk 88 40 3.09
Potato 86 [210] 41 [210] ** 3.0 [211]
Fish 3.55
Casein 2.50
Soybean 84 42 2.32
Rice 81 44 2.18
Rye flour 76 46
Maize 72 49 1.18
Beans 72 49 1.48
Wheat flour 56 63 0.6
* Of the protein part.
** Calculated.
30 Amino Acids
Table 10. Increase of the protein efficiency ratio (PER) by supplementation with amino acids [190, 203]
Food (protein content) l-Lys·HCl, l-Thr, d,l-Trp, d,l-Met, PER *
% % % %
Wheat flour (10 %) 0.65
0.2 1.56
0.4 1.63
0.4 0.15 2.67
Rice (7.8 %) 1.50
0.2 0.1 2.61
Maize (8.75 %) 1.41
0.4 0.07 2.33
Soybean milk (10 %) 2.12
0.3 3.01
Extruded soy protein (10%) 1.99
0.23 2.62
* Reference protein: casein, PER=2.50.
beans raises the protein efficiency in rat growth nine, asparagine, γ-aminobutyric acid, aspartic
tests impressively. acid, serine, and alanine [227].
Clinical studies [212–214] and field trials Amino acids are relatively tasteless.
have solidified the evidence of the benefits to Nonetheless, they contribute to the flavor of
human nutrition of amino acid supplementation foods. They have characteristic synergistic
[215–218]. However, the general supplementa- flavor-enhancing and flavor-modifying prop-
tion of basic foodstuffs, such as bread and rice, erties, and they are precursors of natural aro-
is not yet practiced extensively. In dietary nutri- mas [228–230]. Amino acids and protein hy-
tion, however, supplementation already plays an drolysates are therefore useful additives in the
important role (Table 11). food industry. The sodium salt of l-glutamic
Some infants exhibit lactose or cow’s milk acid (MSG) exhibits a particularly pronounced
protein incompatibility. The formulas marketed flavor-enhancing effect, leading to the introduc-
for this condition often are based on isolated tion of a fifth human taste concept of umami
soybean protein and are supplemented with l- [231], and has been recognized as a flavoring
methionine to increase the biologic value. The factor for seaweed, sake, miso, and soy sauce
advantageous effects of l-methionine supple- since 1908. The substance is used in concen-
mentation on the physical development of in- trations of 0.1–0.4 % as an additive for spices,
fants has been demonstrated in a series of clin- soups, sauces, meat, and fish, usually in com-
ical studies [219, 220]. Additionally, the food bination with nucleotides [230]. In 2000, the
for pregnant and nursing women, seniors, over- existence of a specific receptor for umami was
weight persons, and athletes can also be supple- confirmed [232].
mented. Extruded soy protein, which is used in L-Cysteine especially enhances the aroma of
large quantities as a meat extender and vegetar- onion [233] and is therefore used to rearomatize
ian meat substitute, can be supplemented with dried onions. Glycine, which has a refreshing,
N-acetyl-l-methionine [221]. sweetish flavor, occurs abundantly in mussels
and prawns. It is considered to be an important
flavor component of these products. When used
5.1.2. Flavorings, Taste Enhancers, and as an additive for vinegar, pickles, and mayon-
Sweeteners naise, it attenuates the sour taste and lends a note
of sweetness to their aroma. D,L-Alanine is used
Free amino acids occur in almost all protein- for the same purpose in the Far East [234]. Gly-
based foods. In some foods their concentration cine is used to mask the aftertaste of the sweet-
is several percent. Foodstuffs having a relatively ener saccharin [235, 236].
high concentration of free amino acids include The l- and d-amino acids usually exhibit pro-
fruit juices [222], cheese [223, 224], beer [225], nounced flavor differences. Many l-enantiomers
and seafood [226]. Approximately 85 % of the taste weakly bitter, whereas their optical an-
free amino acids in orange juice is proline, argi- tipodes, the d-amino acids, taste sweet [237–
Amino Acids 31
Table 11. Amino acids in dietetic products
Protein/protein hydrolysate Supplemented amino acid Use Indication
Cow’s milk, casein, whey protein l-Cyss and/or l-Lys · HCL infant nutrition adapted nutrition
Soy protein l-Met infant nutrition lactose incompatibility and
milk protein allergy
Casein/yeast l-Lys · HCl meal supplement protein malnutrition, in place
of conventional nutrition
239] (Table 12). For the most part, dipep- pyridines, imidazoles, pyrazines, quinoxalines,
tides and oligopeptides have bitter flavors. One thiophenes, thiolanes, trithianes, thiazoles, and
of the few exceptions is the methyl ester of oxazoles.
the dipeptide l-aspartyl-l-phenylalanine (As- It is often possible to assign certain aro-
partame) [240, 241], which is 150–200 times mas to specific amino acids [252]. For exam-
sweeter than sucrose ( → Sweeteners). ple, the sulfur-containing amino acid cysteine is
primarily responsible for the formation of meat
Table 12. Tastes of l- and d-amino acids* [239] flavor. Proline seems to be important for the
l-Amino acid d-Amino acid aroma of bread crust. Phenylalanine, as well as
Alanine sweet (12–18) sweet (12–18) the branched-chain amino acids leucine and va-
Arginine bitter neutral line, is important for the characteristic flavor of
Asparagine neutral sweet (3–6)
Aspartic acid acidic/neutral acidic/neutral chocolate. Valine and leucine are also involved
Cysteine sulfurous sulfurous in the aroma of roasted nuts. Methionine plays
Glutamine neutral sweet (8–12) a key role in the aroma of French fries. The fla-
Glutamic acid acidic/“glutamate-like”acidic/neutral
Glycine sweet (25–35) sweet (25–35)
vors of such products as precooked foods, snack
Histidine bitter sweet (2–4) articles, and spices may be improved by addi-
Isoleucine bitter sweet (8–12) tion of the proper Maillard aromas. One vari-
Leucine bitter sweet (2–5) ation is adding the precursors of the Maillard
Lysine sweet/bitter sweet
Methionine sulfurous sweet/sulfurous
aromas, i.e., amino acid plus sugar, to the food-
(4–7) stuff and allowing the fragrance to form in situ.
Phenylalanine bitter sweet (1–3) Some aroma profiles that can be prepared from
Proline sweet/bitter (25–40) neutral
amino acids are compiled in Table 13.
Serine sweet (25–35) sweet (30–40)
Threonine sweet (35–45) sweet (40–50)
Tryptophan bitter sweet (0.2–0.4) Table 13. Amino acids for Maillard flavors *
Tyrosine bitter sweet (1–3) Meat, poultry [253] Cys, Cyss, Gly, Glu, Ala, Met,
Valine bitter sweet (10–14) His, Ser, Asp, Pro
* Threshold values for sweet taste in parenthesis, µmol/mL; the Bread, cracker, biscuit [247, Pro, Lys, Arg, Val, His, Leu, Glu,
threshold value for sucrose is 10–12 µmol/mL. 254] Phe, Asp, Gly, Gln
Chocolate, cocoa [255] Leu, Phe, Val, Glu, Ala
The free amino acids are used widely in food- Honey [256–258] Phe
stuff technology as precursors for aromas and Cream, butter [259] Pro, Lys, Ala, Gly, His
Nut, peanut [260] Leu, Val, Ile, Pro, Glu, Gln, His,
brown food colors [242]. The flavors are formed Phe, Asp, Asn
during foodstuff production, e.g., during the Potato [261] Met
ripening of cheese [243, 244], the fermentation Tobacco [257, 262] Asn, Arg, GABA, Gln, Ala, Gly,
Orn, Glu, Asp, Leu, Val, Thr,
of alcoholic beverages [245, 246], or the leav- Pro, Tyr, Phe
ening of dough [247, 248], or foodstuff cook- * Key amino acids underlined.
ing, e.g., frying, roasting, boiling, by the Mail-
lard reaction between amino acids and reduc-
ing sugars (nonenzymatic browning) [228, 249,
250]. The Strecker degradation of amino acids 5.1.3. Other Uses in Foodstuff Technology
plays a central role in this process. A broad spec-
Amino acids are used in the foodstuff industry
trum of aroma-intensive, volatile compounds
for purposes other than supplementation and fla-
forms [251, 252]. The most important classes are
voring. l-Cysteine, for example, is used by the
aliphatic carbonyl compounds and heterocycles,
baked goods and pasta industry as a flour addi-
such as furans, pyrones, pyrroles, pyrrolidines,
tive [263, 264]. As a reducing agent, it relaxes
32 Amino Acids
wheat gluten proteins (by cleavage of the disul- The requirement of our livestock, however, is
fide linkages), homogenizes the dough, acceler- comparatively high [272].
ates dough development, and improves the struc- When formulating a feed mix for a given an-
ture of the baked product, while allowing shorter imal type, the manufacturer has two choices for
kneading times. meeting the requirement of a particular amino
Because they are capable of forming com- acid. He may use either an excess of feed pro-
plexes with metals, amino acids act as an- tein that contains large amounts of this amino
tioxidants for fats and fat-containing foodstuffs acid or a minimum of natural protein and sup-
[265]. This effect is strengthened by primary an- plement it with synthetic amino acid. Because
tioxidants, such asα-tocopherol. Melanoidines, methionine, lysine, and threonine are commer-
which are formed during the Maillard reaction, cially available and inexpensive, they are often
are stronger antioxidants than the amino acids used in formulated feed. l-Tryptophan, which in
themselves [266]. Maillard products are also re- many cases is the third or fourth limiting amino
ported to be preservatives [267]. Glycine appar- acid, is becoming more popular as an ingredient
ently exhibits a special preservative effect [268]. for feed supplements, particularly for pigs.
There has been a recent upsurge in the sale of
sports drinks and “energy bars”, foodstuffs con- Amino Acids Content of Feedstuffs. Effec-
taining supplements with selected amino acid. tive supplementation requires an exact knowl-
These drinks were originally designed for per- edge of the natural amino acid content of both
formance athletes, but are now in widespread the individual feedstuffs and the formulated feed
use, and the market is growing rapidly [269]. mix: the desired rates of supplementation must
Amino acids used in functional beverages and always be capable for being measured analyt-
foods include creatine, which is intended to help ically. Ion-exchange and high-pressure liquid
build muscle; the branched-chain amino acids chromatography are reliable and proven meth-
l-isoleucine, l-leucine, and l-valine, which are ods for this.
important components of cell membrane pro- The amino acid contents of individual feed-
teins and assist synthesis of body protein and stuffs are published internationally in a large se-
reduce central fatigue; and l-arginine, which is ries of tabulations (see, e.g., Table 14). However,
a regulatory agent for the circulation (produc- such data must be current and reliable.
tion of NO). These amino acids have a higher
rate of uptake in the body than protein, and im- Amino Acid Requirements of Livestock.
prove muscle strength and recovery after exer- Determining amino acid requirement of animals
cise [270]. requires difficult, time-consuming experiments.
The values derived from these experiments are
not constants valid for all times but vary depend-
5.2. Animal Nutrition ing on environmental (heat stress, disease), ge-
netic (sex, breed), and dietary factors (protein
The use of amino acids for the nutrition of mono- level, energy level, feed intake). There are es-
gastric animals is based on the same foundation sentially three methods for determining these re-
as the supplementation of human foodstuffs and quirements: carcass or milk analysis, synthetic
the clinical experience with humans. In practice, rations, and semisynthetic rations.
the enrichment of animal feeds and formulated For the first method, the amino acid content of
feeds with amino acids, especially methionine a carcass is taken as a first-order approximation
and lysine, represents far greater quantities than to the amino acid requirement of an animal. The
does human nutrition. By supplementing feeds same method can be applied for young suckling
or formulated feeds with the first limiting amino mammals by analyzing the amino acid content
acid an obvious cost reduction can be achieved, of the milk.
while maintaining the quality of the ration [271]. In the second method, the test animal is fed a
Of the ca. 20 amino acids found in feed pro- synthetic mixture of all amino acids, along with
tein, about one half are essential for monogastric an otherwise balanced ration (control group).
animals (see Table 4). Most natural feeds are rel- The requirement for a single amino acid is deter-
atively poor in methionine and lysine (Table 14). mined by reducing its content in the diet to zero
Amino Acids 33
Table 14. Amino acid composition of feedstuffs, wt % [272, 273]
Feedstuff Dry Crude Met Met+Cys Lys Thr Trp Arg Leu Ile Val His
matter protein
Alfalfa 88 17.7 0.27 0.50 0.86 0.76 0.25 0.81 0.72 1.27 0.91 0.36
Barley 88 10.6 0.18 0.42 0.38 0.36 0.12 0.53 0.37 0.73 0.52 0.24
Beans, field 88 25.4 0.20 0.52 1.63 0.90 0.22 2.29 1.03 1.89 1.15 0.67
Blood meal 91 88.8 1.03 2.17 7.96 3.85 1.42 3.94 1.17 11.39 7.69 5.65
Corn 88 8.5 0.18 0.37 0.25 0.31 0.06 0.40 0.29 1.05 0.41 0.26
Corn gluten 88 19.0 0.32 0.71 0.58 0.68 0.11 0.85 0.59 1.69 0.89 0.59
feed
Corn gluten 88 60.6 1.43 2.52 1.02 2.08 0.31 1.93 2.48 10.19 2.79 1.28
meal
Feather meal 91 81.1 0.61 4.74 2.08 3.82 0.54 5.62 3.86 6.79 5.88 0.93
Fish meal 91 62.9 1.77 2.34 4.81 2.64 0.66 3.66 2.57 4.54 3.03 1.78
Meat and bone 91 49.1 0.68 1.18 2.51 1.59 0.28 3.45 1.34 2.98 2.04 0.91
meal
Meat meal 91 48.8 0.68 1.24 2.44 1.63 0.30 3.42 1.40 2.99 2.13 0.93
Oat 88 12.6 0.22 0.57 0.53 0.44 0.14 0.87 0.48 0.92 0.66 0.31
Rapeseed 88 34.8 0.70 1.59 1.95 1.53 0.45 2.15 1.37 2.47 1.77 0.97
meal,
Rice 88 7.3 0.20 0.37 0.26 0.26 0.09 0.60 0.29 0.59 0.40 0.18
Sesame meal 88 41.1 1.15 1.97 1.01 1.44 0.54 4.86 1.47 2.74 1.85 0.98
Sorghum 88 9.3 0.17 0.34 0.22 0.31 0.10 0.38 0.37 1.21 0.46 0.23
Soybean meal, 88 44.0 0.64 1.31 2.75 1.76 0.57 3.28 2.01 3.44 2.09 1.21
44 % CP*
Soybean meal, 88 47.6 0.69 1.41 2.98 1.89 0.61 3.52 2.16 3.71 2.23 1.31
48 % CP
Sunflower 88 33.5 0.77 1.36 1.19 1.25 0.40 2.75 1.37 2.15 1.66 0.88
meal
Tapioca 88 3.3 0.04 0.09 0.12 0.11 0.04 0.18 0.11 0.19 0.14 0.08
Triticale 88 11.6 0.21 0.49 0.42 0.39 0.12 0.61 0.42 0.79 0.55 0.29
Wheat 88 13.3 0.21 0.50 0.38 0.38 0.15 0.64 0.44 0.87 0.56 0.32
Wheat bran 88 15.7 0.25 0.58 0.64 0.52 0.22 1.07 0.49 0.98 0.72 0.44
Wheat gluten 88 14.4 0.22 0.52 0.46 0.46 0.19 0.86 0.45 0.89 0.67 0.39
feed
Wheat gluten 88 74.3 1.17 2.79 1.24 1.89 0.68 2.59 2.65 5.20 2.88 1.54
meal
* Crude Protein
and from there on supplementing it stepwise up acid composition. In poultry, for example, the
to an amount where the animal performs as well proportion of lysine is much higher in mus-
as the control group. cle protein than in feather protein. In contrast,
The third and most commonly used method methionine and cystine are required in a higher
is that a basal diet consisting of typically used percentage for the formation of feather protein
feeds is formulated to be deficient in one ami- and for maintaining metabolic functions than for
no acid but adequate in all other nutrients. To muscle protein.
this basal diet graded levels of the amino acid in Not only the amino acid composition of the
question are added until the performance of the different proteins varies but also the quantity of
animal approaches a maximum. The response each protein deposited in the animal changes
in growth to stepwise increasing of amino acid with age. The daily accretion of muscle protein
supplementation follows the law of diminishing increases up to a certain age depending on the
returns and can be described best by an expo- species and declines thereafter. The daily pro-
nential function. tein requirement for metabolic functions rises
Amino acid recommendations and require- continually as the animal grows. Another rea-
ments vary between species and for each species son for amino acid recommendations changing
with age. There are several physiological rea- with age is the fact that young animals have a
sons for that: high potential for growth but at the same time
The various proteins deposited in the ani- a relatively small feed intake capacity which re-
mal’s body differ considerably in their amino quires a high nutrient density in the diet.
34 Amino Acids
Table 15. Amino acid recommendations, wt %, for poultry [273] and pigs [274, 275]
Species Metabolizable Crude Met Met+ Lys Thr Trp
energy, MJ/kg protein Cys
Broiler
Starter 12.7 21 0.57 0.92 1.27 0.80 0.20
Grower 13.2 18 0.44 0.76 1.00 0.65 0.19
Finisher 13.2 17 0.41 0.74 0.95 0.63 0.11
Laying hen (105 g feed intake per 12.0 16 0.38 0.71 0.80 0.52 0.15
day)
Turkey (weeks of age)
0–4 11.7 28 0.66 1.15 1.80 1.06 0.31
5–8 12.1 25 0.59 1.04 1.60 0.95 0.27
9–12 12.6 22 0.53 0.92 1.40 0.84 0.24
13–16 13.0 19 0.46 0.80 1.20 0.73 0.20
> 16 13.4 16 0.43 0.75 1.10 0.67 0.19
Pig (kg live weight)
10–19 10.4 18 0.48 0.87 1.40 0.94 0.25
20–30 10.2 17 0.40 0.74 1.15 0.79 0.23
40–70 9.8 14.5 0.35 0.64 0.95 0.68 0.19
70–105 9.6 13.5 0.30 0.55 0.82 0.59 0.16
Sow
Lactating 9.8 16.5 0.36 0.65 1.00 0.70 0.20
Pregnant 8.9 12.5 0.23 0.42 0.70 0.46 0.14
The amino acid recommendations for domes- Protein and Amino Acid Digestibilities of
tic monogastric animals are listed in Table 15. Feed Ingredients. The nutritive value of pro-
tein for monogastric animals is determined not
Economics of Amino Acid Supplementa- only by the amino acid composition of the diet
tion. The purpose of modern, formulated feed but also by digestibility of the individual amino
mixes is to meet all nutritional requirements of acids, in particular the amino acids likely to be
the animal at a minimum cost, and amino acids limiting. Over the last decades, considerable re-
and proteins are usually among the most expen- search has been carried out that demonstrates
sive components of a feed mix. The performance large differences in amino acid digestibilities
of a feed mix is measured primarily by feed uti- between feeds.
lization and weight gain. Both feed utilization Amino acid digestibilities can be determined
and weight gain, as well as other factors such as according to the ileal or fecal analysis method.
laying performance or feather or hair growth, are The fecal analysis method measures the amount
directly dependent on a sufficient supply of ami- of each amino acid consumed and excreted in
no acids. Methionine and lysine play the major feces. The amino acid digestibilities determined
roles. Methionine in the form of d,l-methionine according to the ileal analysis method are cal-
and lysine in the form of l-lysine · HCl are used culated based on the intake and amount of each
in place of or as a supplement to natural methi- amino acid passing at the end of the distal ileum.
onine and lysine sources [276]. The ileal analysis method should be considered
Linear programming is the method of choice as an improvement on the fecal analysis method,
for simultaneously optimizing a ration and min- since the protein or amino acid absorbed in the
imizing cost [277]. This method allows simul- large intestine make little or no contribution to
taneous consideration of all demands that are the protein status of the animal. The ileal anal-
made on the ration. A prerequisite is exact data ysis method is also very sensitive to differences
on the nutrient content of all available feedstuffs in amino acid digestibilities, as these result from
and additives as well as their prices and avail- processing conditions or from inherent differ-
abilities. Additionally, the restrictions, i.e., the ences between samples of the same feedstuff.
dietary requirements that the ration has to fulfill, Digestibilities measured over the entire diges-
must be known. Table 16 shows two examples tive tract may be altered by resident bacteria.
of feed mixes formulated by the linear program- The bacteria may break down some of the ami-
ming method commonly used. no acids, convert them to other amino acids, or
even produce new amino acids. Measuring ami-
Amino Acids 35
Table 16. Two examples of formulated feeds
Broiler feed composition, wt % Pig fattening feed composition, wt %
Yellow corn 28.00 Feed grain (barley, wheat, corn) 35.00
Wheat 20.00 Soybean meal (44 % crude protein) 19.00
Soybean meal (48 % crude protein) 30.00 Tapioca meal 20.00
Tapioca meal 10.00 Corn gluten feed 15.00
Fat 7.00 Meat and bone meal (45 % crude 3.00
protein)
Meat and bone meal (45 % crude 3.00 Fat 3.00
protein)
Mineral premix 1.25 Beet molasses 2.00
Vitamin-trace element premix 0.50 Mineral premix 2.43
d,l-Methionine 0.25 Vitamin-trace element premix 0.50
100.00 d,l-Methionine 0.07
100.00
no acids excreted in the feces will not reflect the surface and ground water where they accu-
unabsorbed amino acid, but rather unabsorbed mulate.
amino acids after possible alteration by the bac- The total amount of nitrogen produced is de-
teria. pendent on both the average number of animals
Amino acid digestibility values from the liter- per unit available on and the efficiency of con-
ature, determined with the ileal analysis method version of feed protein into body protein. This
(Table 17) show large differences in amino acid efficiency is often impaired due to diets that are
digestibilities between feeds and among differ- not balanced for the specific amino acid require-
ent samples of the same feed. ments of the animal fed. The portion of protein
The differences in amino acid digestibility of that is fed without supplying an adequate mix
feeds can be attributed to various factors. These of amino acids is thus excreted without being
include, e.g., fiber levels, heat damage during utilized by the animals. Meanwhile the animal’s
processing and the presence of antinutritional requirements for amino acids are well known
factors that interfere with nutrient digestion and which allows a reduction in the total protein
utilization. content of diets as long as the diet is supple-
Studies have clearly shown improvements in mented with amino acids in accordance with the
diet formulation practices, when diets are for- animal’s specific requirements. As a result, feed
mulated on the basis of ileal digestible rather protein utilization is maximized and also water
than on supply of limiting amino acids. This intake as a means to excrete excess nitrogen via
holds especially true when a good quality pro- the kidney is reduced.
tein supplement is replaced by protein supple- In consequence the N-output from livestock
ment(s) of lower quality combined with sup- production can be reduced down to 65 % when
plementary amino acids. In consequence, amino supplemental amino acids are used together with
acid requirements should be expressed as ileal a reduction of the protein content of the diet.
digestible, rather than as total amino acid re-
quirements.
5.3. Pharmaceuticals
Amino Acids as a Measure to Reduce the
N-Output from Livestock Production. Ani- The pharmaceutical industry requires amino
mal production accounts for a significant portion acids at a rate between 2000 and 3000 t/a world-
of nitrogen containing compounds released into wide. More than half of this is used for infusion
the environment. In areas with intensive live- solutions. During the last few years the poten-
stock production this might result in environ- tial of amino acids and their derivatives as active
mental problems, especially if N-requirements ingredients for pharmaceuticals has been recog-
for crop fertilization and N-output from live- nized clearly, and considerable growth can be
stock production get out of balance. In this case predicted.
nitrogen containing compounds are released into
36 Amino Acids
Table 17. Range of ileal digestibilities (%) of lysine, methionine, and threonine in different feeds for pigs modified from [274]
Amino acids Lysine Methionine Threonine
Cereal grains
Barley 65–79 72–88 64–76
Wheat 62–81 79–92 51–78
Corn 71–82 88–92 74–79
Protein supplements
Soybean meal (44 % CP* ) 85–89 77–90 73–81
Canola meal 74–76 81–87 66–67
Meat and bone meal 58–67 72–79 53–62
Cottonseed meal 53–70 65–82 55–69
* Crude Protein
5.3.1. Nutritive Agents total parenteral nutrition over many years is pos-
sible. In such a case, all essential nutrients (un-
Infusion Solutions. Parenteral nutrition saturated fatty acids, vitamins, and trace ele-
with l-amino acid infusion solutions is a well- ments) must be provided.
established component of clinical nutrition Elemental Diets. Enteral nutrition is also a
therapy. A standard infusion solution contains means of providing the essential nutrients [278].
the eight classical essential amino acids, the Elemental diets, which were developed origi-
semiessential amino acids l-arginine and l- nally for the astronauts [389], contain chemi-
histidine, and several nonessential amino acids, cally defined nutritive components. In addition
generally glycine, l-alanine, l-proline, l-serine, to free amino acids the mixtures generally con-
and l-glutamic acid. tain carbohydrates, fats, minerals, and vitamins
Also available are special infusion solutions in a combination adapted to the requirements.
tailored to the requirements of particular groups, In many cases, elemental diets are used as an al-
such as newborn infants, seniors, or patients ternative and supplement to parenteral nutrition.
with an extreme negative nitrogen balance. So- They have high nutritional value and are totally
lutions rich in the branched-chained amino acids resorbable. They are largely independent of the
leucine, isoleucine, and valine and poor in methi- digestive function of the pancreas and reduce the
onine and aromatic amino acids are available for intestinal bacteria flora. Amino acid elemental
liver-disease patients. Solutions containing only diets generally are used in cases of anatomic,
essential amino acids are available for kidney functional, or enzymatic defects [279].
patients. Enzymatic protein hydrolysates, which Formula diets based on peptides are gaining
were used as infusion solutions until the 1980s ground as an alternative to elemental diets based
have disappeared almost completely from the on l-amino acids. According to [280], short-
market. They were not available in the optimal chained peptides are resorbed rapidly via a pep-
composition, and there were often compatibility tide transport system in the gut, therefore in a
problems. Only pure, crystalline l-amino acids process that is independent of amino acid trans-
are used in modern infusion solutions. The so- port. Compositions of nitrogen-free amino acid
lutions (up to 10 %), which also contain elec- analogues (keto acids and hydroxy acids) have
trolytes in addition to amino acids, are sterile come into use for the special case of kidney in-
and pyrogen-free. sufficiency (chronic renal failure).
The simultaneous administration of carbo- Elemental diets or formula diets are admin-
hydrates is necessary for optimal utilization of istered orally or via a nasogastric tube directly
the amino acids. Glucose is normally a separate into the gastrointestinal tract.
infusion. Some commercially available amino
acid infusion solutions contain an energy source
in the form of sugar alcohols (sorbitol, xylitol), 5.3.2. Therapeutic Agents
which do not enter into a Maillard reaction with Many therapeutic agents are derivatives of
the amino acids. natural or nonnatural amino acids. Exam-
Normally, parenteral nutrition is only prac- ples are benserazide, captopril, and dextrothy-
ticed over a limited time. In principle, however, roxine. They are described under keywords
Amino Acids 37
group of compounds may be divided into valine chloride and subsequent coupling with racemic
derivatives and nonvaline derivatives. The va- methyl 2-chloropropionate.
line is usually acylated to form an urethane or a This fungicide is mainly used for the seed
maleimide. The carboxylic group is condensed treatment business, in wine and in vegetables.
with a substituted aniline, an alkyl benzylamine The compound is sold as a stand-alone prod-
or an alkyl homobenzylamine [337, 338]. uct or in a variety of mixtures with other fungi-
cides. It was introduced in the market in 1978.
The (R)-isomer, based on D-alanine, is known
as Metalaxyl-M [70630-17-0] or Ridomil Gold,
and was introduced by Syngenta in the USA in
1996.
wide variety of industrial areas. This is partic- Various staining methods may be used for the
ularly because of their physicochemical proper- qualitative identification of α-amino acids [364].
ties, such as high thermal stability, low volatil- Some of these dye-forming reactions are suitable
ity, amphoterism, buffering capacity, and the for quantitative analysis within the validity range
ability to form complexes. However, properties of the Lambert–Beer law. By far the most impor-
of amino acids such as environmental accept- tant is the reaction with ninhydrin, which yields
ability and low toxicity, are becoming increas- a red-violet to blue-violet dye (λmax = 570 nm).
ingly important. A few of the recorded uses
have been listed below, and include acylamino
acid monomers for epoxy resins [345]; amino
acid dispersing agents for pigments in coloring
polyester fibers [346]; N-acylamino acid dis-
persants for polyurethanes in water [347]; ami-
no acid setting retarders for cement [348]; zinc
salts of N-acyl-derivatives of basic amino acids
and N-acylamino acids for the thermal stabiliza-
tion of PVC [349]; polyglutamic acid esters and
polyaspartic acid esters coatings for natural and
synthetic leather [350]; amino acid hardening
agents for methacrylate resins [351]; N-acylami- The imino acids proline and hydroxyproline
no acid, amino acid ester, and amino acid amide form a structurally different dye, with an absorp-
gel-forming agents for oils [352]; basic amino tion maximum at 440 nm.
acid vulcanization accelerators for natural rub- Fluorescent reagents also have been used
ber [353]; amino acid [354] and N-acylamino successfully for quantitative analysis. The ami-
acid [355] corrosion inhibitors for metals; ami- no acid is converted into a strongly fluores-
no acids to stabilize the latent image of photo- cent derivative, which increases the sensitiv-
graphic emulsions [356]; and amino acid bright- ity by orders of magnitude. Typical fluorescent
eners in galvanic baths [357, 358]. reagents are o-phthalaldehyde–2-mercaptoetha-
nol [365], 1-dimethylaminonaphthalene-5-sul-
fonyl chloride (dansyl chloride) [366], and
6. Chemical Analysis 4-phenylspiro [furan-2(3H)-1 -phthalan]-3,3 -
dione (fluorescamine) [367].
Amino acids do not have defined melting points The separation of amino acid mixtures is pos-
but decompose over a broad range between sible by electrophoresis or chromatography. The
250 and 300 ◦ C. Therefore, they must be trans- latter is especially useful, techniques including
formed into derivatives before melting points paper, thin layer, ion-exchange, high-pressure
are useful for identification. Phenylisothiocy- liquid, and gas chromatography. The different
anate is used to yield the phenylthiohydan- techniques have been reviewed and compared in
toin amino acid (PTH amino acid) [8], or 2,4- [368]. Paper chromatography is generally car-
dinitrofluorobenzene (Sanger’s reagent) is used ried out in two dimensions. A number of elu-
to yield the dinitrophenyl amino acid [8]. ents are available for this purpose. Quite often
Spectroscopic methods for the identification the amino acid is converted to its dinitrophenyl
of amino acids include infrared [359], Raman, derivative.
1
H-NMR, and 13 C-NMR spectroscopy [360] of More common than paper chromatography
free amino acids or PTH derivatives and mass is thin layer chromatography (TLC) of either
spectrometry of PTH derivatives [361]. Ultravi- the free amino acids [369] or their PTH deriva-
olet spectroscopy is important only for aromatic tives [370]. Silica gel, aluminum oxide, cellulose
amino acids. The different methods for quali- powder, or polyacrylamide may be used as car-
tative and quantitative analysis of amino acids, rier, but silica is preferred. An indicator reagent,
particularly of mixtures from protein hydrolysis most often ninhydrin, is used for detection [371].
and biological fluids, have been reviewed [362]. For detection of very small quantities the amino
Separation methods are described in [363].
Amino Acids 47
acids separated on an TLC plate can be converted no acids efficiently without prior derivatization.
to the fluorescamine derivatives [372]. The de- These machines generally incorporate postcol-
tection limit is 10 pmol. The time required for umn visualization with ninhydrin and photomet-
the analysis of dinitrophenyl amino acids can be ric quantification. Today this method rivals ion-
reduced by using high-pressure thin layer chro- exchange chromatography as the preferred ana-
matography [373]. TLC is often specified as an lytical method.
analytical test to show the levels of foreign ami- Gas chromatographic methods [387] are use-
no acids in a sample, particularly when the ami- ful for the analysis of complex amino acid
no acid is from natural sources. mixtures. However, the amino acids must be
Ion-exchange chromatography [374, 375] on converted into volatile derivatives, e.g., PTH
organic resins (Dowex, Amberlite, etc.) has amino acids [388], methyl esters of N-tri-
proven to be the most exact and reliable method fluoroacetylamino acids [389], n-butyl esters
for the separation and quantitative analysis of of N-trifluoroacetylamino acids [390], N-tri-
amino acids. Before the automatic analysis tech- methylsilylamino acids [391], or N,O-bis-tri-
nique was introduced [376], complete analysis methylsilylamino acids [392]. Gas chromatog-
of an amino acid mixture required 24 h. To- raphy coupled with electron-capture negative-
day 2 h is the rule. Sodium citrate or lithium ionization mass spectrometry (GC–ECNI–MS)
citrate buffer solutions are the eluents. The has been used to determine amino acids at the
eluate is reacted with ninhydrin [374, 377] femtomole scale, using 2 H or 13 C labeled amino
or o-phthalaldehyde [378]. With ninhydrin, 1– acids as reference standards [393].
20 nmol amino acid can be measured with an Electrophoresis [394], which employs the
accuracy of ± 1–5 %. The detection limit with differing rates of migration in an electric field, is
o-phthalaldehyde is in the picomole range. Ion- becoming more important [395]. The technique
pair chromatography on a porous graphitic car- is already well-established for protein analysis,
bon stationary phase has also been applied. De- and has been coupled with electrospray ioniza-
tection is by evaporative light scattering, or by tion mass spectrometry (CE–ESI–MS) to de-
electrospray mass spectrometry [379]. termine underivatized amino acids at micromo-
Ion-exchange chromatography is the method lar level [396]. Capillary isotachophoresis is a
of choice for analyzing amino acids in feeds, new high-resolution electrophoresis technique
foodstuffs, and biologic fluids [380]. In general, for amino acids.
analysis is preceded by a hydrolysis, which de- The chromatographic separation of amino
grades the proteins and peptides to their com- acid enantiomers is the subject of intensive in-
ponent amino acids. However, acidic hydroly- vestigation. Separation is currently possible by
sis can destroy Cys, Met, and Trp residues, and gas chromatography [397] and high-pressure
special techniques may be necessary to analyze liquid chromatography [398], using optically ac-
for these amino acids. Figure 10 shows a sample tive phases or chiral solvents [399]. A wide
aminogram of broiler feed. range of chiral stationary phases is now avail-
Utilization of high-pressure liquid chro- able for analytical or preparative separations.
matography (HPLC) allows a further reduction Another method is to use a chiral precolumn
in analysis time. Originally, the amino acids derivatizing agent. Marfey’s reagent (1-fluoro-
were converted to derivatives, e.g., to dansyl 2,4-dinitrophenyl-5-l-alanine amide) has been
amino acids [381], PTH amino acids [382], successfully applied to separate complex mix-
or dinitrophenyl derivatives [383], before anal- tures of amino acids into their separate enan-
ysis. Reversed phases are the preferred sta- tiomers, and is effective at the nanomolar scale
tionary phases. Ninhydrin, o-phthalaldehyde– [400, 401]. Marfey’s reagent forms diastereo-
mercaptoethanol [384], or fluorescamine [385] meric salt pairs with the amino acids, that are
are the usual reagents for detection. An HPLC particularly well separated by HPLC.
method with direct UV detection has also been The microbiological analysis of amino acids
described [386] for analysis of infusion solu- is based on the fact that several l-amino acids are
tions. Modern automated amino acid analyz- essential for certain bacteria strains. The growth
ers are now available, that use quaternary gra- of the bacteria cultures under standard condi-
dient elution to separate all the common ami- tions can be quantitatively evaluated (acidime-
48 Amino Acids
try or turbidimetry) and related to the amino acid Glacial acetic acid is a suitable solvent. Formic
concentration. Lactic acid bacteria [402] (Lacto- acid may be added to improve solubility. The
bacteriaceae) can be used to analyze 19 l-amino titrant is perchloric acid. Formol titration by the
acids. Typical test microbes include Leuconos- method of Sörensen can be used for aqueous so-
toc mesenteroides (ATCC 8042), Lactobacillus lutions but is less accurate.
arabinosus 17−5 (ATCC 8014), and Streptococ- Standards of purity for individual l- and d,l-
cus faecalis R (ATCC 9790, 8043). The conven- amino acids that are used in drugs or as food
tional microbiological methods are quite com- additives are published in pharmacopeias [406,
plicated but can be simplified by automation 408] and food codices [409].
[403].
A series of l- or d-amino acids can be ana-
lyzed by enzymatic methods. l-Amino acids, or 7. Economic Significance
the enantiomeric purity of d-amino acids, can
be determined with bacteria decarboxylases by The 2005 world market for amino acids is esti-
measurement of CO2 formed. d-Amino acids, or mated at more than 3.3 × 106 t/a (Table 19). The
the enantiomeric purity of l-amino acids, can “big three” amino acids, sodium l-glutamate,
be determined with kidney d-amino acid oxi- d,l-methionine, and l-lysine · HCl, account for
dases by measurement of the O2 consumption. approximately 95 % of the volume (Table 20).
Enzymes that react only with a single amino The other amino acids play only a small role.
acid allow determination of that amino acid, e.g., The dominant amino acid, sodium glutamate, is
arginine using liver arginase. An improved en- used almost exclusively as a taste enhancer. d,l-
zymatic method consists of the use of enzyme Methionine and l-lysine · HCl are used almost
electrodes that contain the enzymes [404], or exclusively to improve the nutritive value of an-
microorganisms having a special enzyme in a imal feeds. l-Threonine is also used mainly in
fixed form. Enzyme electrodes, however, are rel- animal feeds. l-Aspartic acid and l-phenylal-
atively unstable [405]. anine are used principally for the manufacture
The quantitative determination of crystal- of the intense sweetener aspartame. The other
lized amino acids is carried out by acidimet- amino acids have diversified applications. With
ric titration in nonaqueous medium [406, 407]. the exception of glycine, they are more expen-
sive than the big three amino acids. In terms of
Amino Acids 49
volume, feed additives used about 1 500 000 t China, with established manufacturers setting up
of amino acids, pharmaceuticals 17 000 t and plants there.
sweeteners around 17 000 t (2005) [410]. Ta-
ble 21 shows the market value for amino acids
in 2004 broken down by field of use [52]. The 8. Toxicology
total value of the global amino acids market in
2004 was estimated at $ 4.5 × 109 [52]. Excess amino acids are rapidly disposed of by in-
creased metabolic degradation. Should the ami-
Table 19. Amino acid production, 2005 no acid dose be suddenly increased, e.g., by ex-
Amino acid Quantity, t/a [410–413] tremely high protein consumption, within about
l-Alanine 1500 two days the liver adaptively increases the levels
l-Arginine * 3000 of amino acid-catabolizing enzymes — transam-
l-Asparagine 200
inases, enzymes of the urea cycle, cystathionase,
l-Aspartic acid 15 000
l-Cysteine * 7000 tryptophan pyrrolase, etc. The excess amino
l-Glutamic acid * 1 690 000 acids are to a large extent used to provide energy.
l-Glutamine 2000 The nitrogen is eliminated as urea. A smaller
Glycine 16 000
l-Histidine 300
portion is used in protein synthesis, mainly liver
l-Hydroxyproline 100 protein and plasma albumin.
l-Isoleucine 500 When too little protein or no protein is con-
l-Leucine 800 sumed or when the component amino acids are
l-Lysine * 850 000
d,l-Methionine 600 000 imbalanced, alteration of the ribosome profile
l-Methionine 400 occurs in the liver, and ribonucleic acids are ca-
l-Phenylalanine 14 000 tabolized. The manifestation of chronic protein
l-Proline 800
l-Serine 300
deficiency is known as marasmus (slight defi-
l-Threonine 85 000 ciency) and kwashiorkor (extreme deficiency).
l-Tryptophan 2000 Protein deficiency is usually coupled with calo-
l-Tyrosine 150 rie deficiency (protein–calorie malnutrition).
l-Valine 1100
d-Phenylglycine + 9000
This manifests itself on the biochemical level
d-p-hydroxyphenylglycine as a negative nitrogen balance, indicating a re-
Others 5000 duction in protein inventory. Initially, the labile
Total 3 300 000
enzyme and plasma proteins are consumed, the
* Free amino acid and salts.
* Free amino acid and derivatives. greatest losses occurring first in the liver, then in
the musculature. Brain, heart, and kidneys suf-
Table 20. Percentage of individual amino acids as a part of the fer only minimal protein loss. Symptoms of pro-
total market, 2005 tein synthesis disorders include disturbances in
Amino acid Quantity, % wound healing and bone growth, lowered resis-
l-Glutamic acid (Na) 51
d,l-Methionine 18
tance to infection and stress, loss of fertility and
l-Lysine (HCl) 26 appetite, and anorexia. The urinary excretion of
Other amino acids 5 3-methylhistidine is a common indicator of the
catabolism of muscle protein.
Table 21. Market value by field of use, 2004 The total absence of an essential amino acid
Use Value, % in the diet is more serious than protein defi-
Animal nutrition 56 ciency. In this case the proteins or amino acids
Human nutrition 32 in the diet are totally worthless because protein
Specialty * 12
synthesis can occur only by degradation of body
* Pharmaceuticals, cosmetics, agrochemicals, and industrial uses.
protein. A general interruption of the protein
The main manufacturers of amino acids synthesis results. This manifests itself rapidly
are located in Japan (e.g., Ajinomoto, Ky- as a drop in enzyme activity and an impoverish-
owa Hakko, Tanabe) and in Europe (Degussa, ment of the plasma proteins. Noticeable symp-
Wacker, Amino, Flamma). Recently there has toms are loss of appetite and weight, alteration
been an increasing trend towards production in of cornea and lens, anatomic organ alterations,
and an increased rate of mortality. In addition
50 Amino Acids
there appear specific deficiency symptoms char- The toxicity of amino acids has been re-
acteristic of the missing amino acid or acids. viewed [415, 418]. The acute toxicities of most
The metabolic disturbances brought about by l-amino acids and some derivatives have been
gross divergences from the optimal amino acid determined [420–422]. The toxicology of d-
pattern have three different causes [414, 415]: amino acids is discussed in review articles [415]
imbalance, antagonism, and toxicity. and other publications [421, 422]. There is no
Amino acid imbalance manifests as an ap- evidence to date that the d-enantiomers of the
pearance of deficiency symptoms for the first α-amino acids found in proteins exhibit specific
limiting amino acid when the other amino acids toxic effects. Their LD50 values are generally
are consumed in great excess. The symptoms of higher than those of the l-amino acids.
imbalance are eliminated by administration of
the first limiting amino acid in sufficient quan-
tities. The main symptom is a severe reduction 9. References
of food or feed assimilation and depression of
growth. The depression of growth in rats has General References
been investigated intensively by adding individ- 1. J. P. Greenstein, M. Winitz: Chemistry of the
ual l- and d,l-amino acids to basal diets of var- Amino Acids, vol. 1, 2, and 3, J. Wiley &
ious protein levels [416, 417]. Sons, New York–London 1961.
Amino acid antagonismis caused by compe- 2. A. Meister: Biochemistry of the Amino Acids,
tition for common transport systems. An exam- 2nd ed., vol. 1, Academic Press, New York
ple is antagonism of the branched-chain ami- 1965.
no acids isoleucine, leucine, and valine. The 3. I. Wagner, H. Musso: “Neue natürliche
Aminosäuren” Angew. Chem. 95 (1983),
symptoms are reversible. In a study with young
827–920;
rats, addition of 5 % l-leucine to a low-protein
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 22 (1983) 816
diet (9 % casein) reduced the plasma levels of (review of the literature since 1956).
isoleucine and valine, depressed growth, and re- 4. IUPAC and IUB Joint Commission on
duced feed consumption [418]. These effects Biochemical Nomenclature, Pure Appl.
were eliminated after a latent period of three Chem., 56 (1984) 595.
days by small doses of l-isoleucine (0.16 %) and 5. G. C. Barrett (ed.): Amino Acid Derivatives,
l-valine (0.15 %). Oxford University Press, Oxford 1999.
Amino acid toxicity occurs when very large 6. Houben-Weyl, E16d, 1992.
quantities of one or more amino acids are con- 7. S. E. Wolkenberg, R. M. Garbaccio, Science of
sumed and is characterized by total failure of the Synthesis 20a (2006) 385.
adaptive mechanisms. The toxic level has been 8. Th. Wieland et al.: “Methoden zur Herstellung
studied by adding increasing quantities of indi- und Umwandlung von Aminosäuren und
vidual amino acids to a protein basal diet [415]. Derivaten,” Houben-Weyl, 11/2.
The toxicity of individual amino acids depends 9. H. D. Jakubke, H. Jeschkeit: Aminosäuren,
on the total protein consumption. Imbalance, an- Peptide, Proteine, Verlag Chemie, Weinheim,
tagonism, and toxicity are less pronounced when Germany 1982.
10. B. Weinstein (ed.): Chemistry and
overall protein consumption is sufficient but be-
Biochemistry of Amino Acids, Peptides and
come more severe at lower levels of protein con-
Proteins, vol. 1–5, Marcel Dekker, New York
sumption. The consumption of toxic amounts of 1971 –1978.
amino acids increases their concentration in the 11. D. Barton, W. D. Ollis: Comprehensive
plasma and brain. Because of the blood–brain Organic Chemistry, vol. 2, Chap. 9.6, p. 815;
barrier, however, the increase in the brain is not vol. 5 Pergamon Press, New York 1979.
as great [419]. Failure of the adaptation mecha- 12. G. Krügers: “Aminocarbonsäuren” in:
nisms during consumption of large excess of an Methodicum Chimicum, vol. 6, p. 611.
amino acid can lead to accumulation of the ami- 13. E. Wünsch: “Synthese von Peptiden,”
no acids or certain metabolites in the organism, Houben-Weyl, 15/1 and 15/2.
leading directly or indirectly (e.g., by influenc- Specific References
ing hormone secretion) to anatomic or functional 14. S. K. Bhattacharyya, A. B. Banerjee, Folia
damage. Microbiol. (Prague) 19 (1974) 43.
Amino Acids 51
15. T. Robinson, Life Sci. 19 (1976) 1097. 47. Drugs of the Future 23 (1998) 1057.
16. R. E. Dickerson, Spektrum der Wissenschaften 48. V. N. Gladyshev, D. L. Hatfield, J. Biomed.
1979, no. 9, 98. Sci. 6 (1999) 151.
17. R. S. Cahn, C. Ingold, V. Prelog, Angew. 49. G. N. Schrauzer, J. Nutrition 130 (2000) 1653.
Chem. 78 (1966) 413; 50. Drugs of the Future 19 (1994) 988.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 5 (1966) 385, 511. 51. R. Meister (ed.): Farm Chemical Handbook
18. K. Lübke, E. Schröder, G. Kloss: Chemie und 1990, Meister Publishing Co., Willoughby,
Biochemie der Aminosäuren, Peptide und OH 1990, p. C136.
Proteine, vol. I and II, Thieme Verlag, 52. W. Leuchtenberger, K. Huthmacher, K. Drauz,
Stuttgart 1975. Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 69 (2005) 1.
19. A. Kleemann, Chem. Ztg. 106 (1982) 151–167. 53. T. Hermann, J. Biotechnol. 104 (2003) 155.
20. K. H. Drauz, A. Kleemann, J. Martens, Angew. 54. M. Breuer et al., Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. 43
Chem. 94 (1982) 590; (2004) 788.
Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 21 (1982) 584. 55. J. Jones: Amino Acid and Peptide Synthesis,
21. A. Berkessel, H.w Gröger: Asymmetric Oxford University Press, Oxford 2002.
Organocatalysis, Wiley-VCH, Weinheim 56. M. Ikeda, in T. Scheper, R. Faurie, J. Thommel
2005. (eds.): Advances in Biochemical
22. Drugs of the Future 23 (1998) 1057. Engineering/Biotechnology 79 (2003) 1.
23. R. P. Nargund, A. A. Patchett, M. A. Bach, M. 57. S. Hashimoto, R. Katsumata, L-Alanine
G. Murphy, R. G. Smith, J. Med. Chem. 41 production by alanine racemase-deficient
(1998) 3103. mutant of Arthrobacter oxydans in: Proc. Ann.
24. Drugs of the Future 19 (1994) 111. Meet. (Agric. Chem. Soc. Jpn.) (1994) 341.
25. H. J. Federsel, Chirality 15 (2003) 128. 58. S. Yahata, H. Tsutsui, K. Yamada, T.
26. A. Müller, E. Busker, J. Engel, B. Kutscher, M. Konehara: “Fermentative production of
Bernd, A. V. Schally, Int. J. Peptide Prot. Res. d-alanine:” in: Proc. Ann. Meet. Agric. Chem.
43 (1994) 264. Soc. Jpn., (1993), 92.
27. Europ. Pat. Appl. EP 0 530 167 A 1, 1993 (B. 59. Tanabe Seiyaku, JP-Kokai 58-9692, 1983 (I.
Atrash, D. M. Jones, M. Szelke). Chibata, M. Kisumi, T. Tagaki).
28. Drugs of the Future 22 (1997) 371. 60. Ajinomoto, US 5 164 307, 1992 (Y. Yoshihara,
29. Drugs of the Future 17 (1992) 551. Y. Kawahara, Y. Yamada).
30. Drugs of the Future 23 (1998) 751. 61. M. Sugiura, S. Suzuki, M. Kisumi, Agric. Biol.
31. J. A. Robl et al., J. Med. Chem. 40 (1997) Chem. 51 (1987) 371–377.
1570. 62. Kyowa Hakko, EP-A 557 996, 1993 (K. Kino,
32. S. Budavari (ed.): The Merck Index, 12th ed., K. Okamoto, Y. Takeda, Y. Kuratsu).
Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ 63. C. Keilhauer, L. Eggeling, H. Sahm, J.
1996, p. 97. Bacteriol. 175 (1993) 5595–5603.
33. A. S. Bommarius, M. Schwarm, K. Stingl, M. 64. Cheil Sugar, FR 2 645 172, 1990 (J. W. Oh, S.
Kottenhahn, K. Huthmacher, K. Drauz, J. Kim, Y. J. Cho, N. H. Park, L. H. Lee).
Tetrahedron: Asymmetry 6 (1995) 2851. 65. University Odessa, SU 1 730 152, 1992 (I. I.
34. Drugs of the Future 21 (1996) 1022. Brown et al.).
35. Drugs of the Future 23 (1998) 1057. 66. Sci. Res. Technol Inst. Amino Acids, USSR,
36. Drugs of the Future 19 (1994) 985. DE-OS 3 612 077, 1986 (Š. M. Kocarian et al.).
37. J. F. Atkins, R. Gesteland, Science 296 (2002) 67. All Union Sci.-Res. Inst. Genetics and
1409. Microorg. Gen. + Selec Univ. Odessa, WO
38. Drugs of the Future 18 (1993) 503. 90/04636, 1990 (V. G. Debabov et al.).
39. Drugs of the Future 23 (1998) 1057. 68. M. Ikeda, K. Nakanishi, K. Kino, R.
40. Drugs of the Future 22 (1997) 260. Katsumata, Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 58
41. Drugs of the Future 22 (1997) 371. (1994) 674–678.
42. S. Budavari (ed.): The Merck Index, 12th ed., 69. M. Furui, K. Yamashita, J. Ferment, Technol.
Merck & Co., Inc., Whitehouse Station, NJ 61 (1983) 587–591.
1996, p. 99. 70. H. Yoshida: “Arginine, Citrulline, and
43. Drugs of the Future 14 (1989) 767. Ornithine,” in K. Aida et al. (eds.):
44. Drugs of the Future 21 (1996) 600. Biotechnology of Amino Acid Production,
45. Drugs of the Future 18 (1993) 1129. Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986,
46. Drugs of the Future 22 (1997) 221. pp. 131–143.
52 Amino Acids
71. I. Chibata, T. Tosa, T. Sato: “Aspartic Acid,” in H. Yamada (eds.): Biotechnology of Amino
H. W. Blanch, S. Drew, D. I. C. Wang (eds.): Acid Production, Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier,
Comprehensive Biotechnology, vol. 3 , Amsterdam 1986, pp. 101–116.
Pergamon Press, Oxford 1985. 93. R. Krämer, BioEngineering 9 (1993) 51–61.
72. Y. Yokote et al., J. Solid-Phase Biochem. 3 94. R. Krämer, FEMS Microbiol. Rev. 13 (1994)
(1978) 247–261. 75–93.
73. M. Terasawa, H. Yukawa, Y. Takayama, 95. I. Shiio, K. Ujigawa, Agric. Biol. Chem. 42
Process Biochem. 20 (1985) 124–128. (1980) 1897–1904.
74. T. Sato et al., Biotechnol. Bioeng. 17 (1975) 96. E. R. Börmann, B. J. Eikmanns, H. Sahm,
1779–1804. Molecular Microbiol. 6 (1992) 317–326.
75. I. Chibata, T. Tetsuya, T. Sato, Appl. Biochem. 97. T. E. Walker et al., J. Biol. Chem. 257 (1982)
Biotechnol. 13 (1986) 231–240. 1189–1195.
76. M. C. Fusee, W. E. Swann, G. J. Calton, Appl. 98. H. Yoishii et al., Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi
Environ. Microbiol. 42 (1981) 672–676. 67 (1993) 949–954.
77. Genex, EP-A 197 784, 1986 (W. E. Swann, A. 99. H. Yoishii, M. Yoshimura, S. Nakamori, S,
C. Nolf). Inoue, Nippon Nogei Kagaku Kaishi 67 (1993)
78. J. Michelet, A. Deschamps, J. M. Lebeault, 3rd 955–960.
Eur. Congr. Biotechnol., vol. 2, Verlag Chemie, 100. Ajinomoto, JP 56 148 295, 1981 (T. Tsuchida,
Weinheim, Germany 1984, pp. 133–138. K. Miwa, S. Nakamori, H. Mimose).
79. M. Mori, I. Shiio, Agric. Biol. Chem. 48 101. M. Shirasuchi et al., Biosci. Biotechnol.
(1984) 1189–1197. Biochem. 59 (1995) 83–86.
80. N. Nishimura, S. Komatsubara, M. Kisumi, 102. T. Tsuchida et al., Agric. Biol. Chem. 51
Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 53 (1987) (1987) 2089–2094.
2800–2803. 103. K. Araki: “Histidine,” in K. Aida, I. Chibata,
81. Maggi, DE 2 449 711, 1979 (P. Hirsbrunne, R. K. Nakayama, K. Takinami, H. Yamada (eds.):
Bertholet). Biotechnology of Amino Acid Production,
82. Mitsubishi Chemical Ind., US 3974031, 1976 Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986,
(H. Yamada, K. Gumagai, H. Ohkishi). pp. 247–256.
83. Consortium für Elektrochemische Industrie 104. M. B. Vickery, J. Biol. Chem. 143 (1942) 77.
GmbH, WO 01/27307, 2001 (T. Maier, C. 105. Kyowa Hakko, EP-A 759 472, 1996 (A. Ozaki,
Winterhalter). H. Mori, T. Shibasaki).
84. T. H. P Maier, Nat. Biotechnol. 21 (2003) 422. 106. J. Ogawa, S. Shimizu, Curr. Opin. Biotechnol.
85. K. Sano, K. Mitsugi, Agric. Biol. Chem. 42 13 (2002) 367.
(1978) 2315–2321. 107. I. Eggeling, C. Cordes, L. Eggeling, H. Sahm,
86. S. Kinoshita, S. Ukada, M. Shimono, J. Gen.
Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 25 (1987)
Appl. Microbiol. 3 (1957) 139–205.
346–351.
87. S. Kinoshita, K. Tanaka: “Glutamic acid,” in
108. E. Scheer, L. Eggeling, H. Sahm, Appl.
K. Yamada, et al. (eds.): The Microbial
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 28 (1988) 474–477.
Production of Amino Acids, John Wiley &
109. C. Wilhelm et al., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
Sons, New York 1972, pp. 263–324.
31 (1989) 458–462.
88. L. Eggeling: Handbook of Corynebacterium
110. Ajinomoto, Patent 5 164 307, 1992 (Y.
Glutamicum, CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL
Yoshihara, Y. Kawahara, Y. Yamada).
2005.
111. S. Komatsubara, M. Kisumi, I. Chibata, J.
89. B. J. Eikmans, M. Kircher, D. J. Reinscheid,
Gen. Microbiol. 119 (1980) 51–61.
FEMS Microbiol. Lett. 82 (1991) 203–208.
112. Ajinomoto, EP-A 519 113, 1992 (V. A.
90. W. Liebl, M. Ehrmann, W. Ludwig, K. H.
Livshits et al.).
Schleifer, Int. J. Syst. Bacteriol. 41 (1991)
113. Kyowa Hakko, EP-A 595 163, 1994 (T.
225–235.
Nakano, T. Azuma, Y. Kuratsu).
91. Y. Hirose, H. Enei, H. Shibai: “L-Glutamic
114. Forsch. Z. Jülich, DE 44 00 926, 1995 (B.
acid fermentation,” in H. W. Blanch, S. Drew,
Möckel, L. Eggeling, H. Sahm).
D. I. C. Wang (eds.): Comprehensive
115. Kyowa Hakko, US 5 362 637, 1994 (K. Kino,
Biotechnology, vol. 3, Pergamon Press Ltd.,
Y. Kuratsu).
Oxford 1985.
92. M. Kikuchi, Y. Nakao: “Glutamic acid,” in K. 116. S. Morbach, H. Sahm, L. Eggeling, Appl.
Aida, I. Chibata, K. Nakayama, K. Takinami, Environ. Microbiol. 61 (1995) 4315–4320.
Amino Acids 53
117. Ajinomoto, EP-A 685 555, 1995 (K. 142. C. T. Evans et al., Biotechnology 5 (1987)
Hashiguchi, H. Kishino, N. Tsujimoto, H. 818–923.
Matsui). 143. A. J. Pittard, Amer. Soc. Microbiol. Conf. Proc.
118. U. Groeger, H. Sahm, Appl. Microbiol. (1987) 368–394.
Biotechnol. 25 (1987) 352–236. 144. I. Shiio: “Tryptophan, phenylalanine, and
119. S. Komatsubara, M. Kisumi: “Histidine,” in K. tyrosine,” in K. Aida, I. Chibata, K.
Aida, I. Chibata, K. Nakayama, K. Takinami, Nakayama, K. Takinami, H. Yamada (eds.):
H. Yamada (eds.): Biotechnology of Amio Acid Biotechnology of Amino Acid Production,
Production, Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986,
Amsterdam 1986, pp. 233–246. pp. 188–206.
120. Ajinomoto, US 5 164 307, 1992 (Y. Yoshihara, 145. S. O. Hwang et al., Appl. Microbiol.
Y. Kawahara, Y. Yamada). Biotechnol. 22 (1985) 108–113.
121. M. Karasawa, O. Tosaka, S. Ikeda, H. Yoshi, 146. H. Ito et al., Agric. Biol. Chem. 54 (1990)
Agric. Biol. Chem. 50 (1986) 339–346. 707–713.
147. B. K. Konstantinov, N. Nishio, T. Yoshida:
122. Kyowa Hakko, US 4 623 623, 1986 (T.
“Glucose feeding strategy accounting for the
Nakanashi et al.).
decreasing oxidative capacity of recombinant
123. Kawahara et al., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol.
Escherichia coli in fed-batch cultivation for
34 (1990) 87–90.
phenylalanine production,” J. Ferment.
124. Ajinomoto, US 5 250 423, 1993 (Y. Murakami,
Bioeng. 70 (1990) 253.
H. Miwa, S. Nakamori).
148. Ajinomoto, US 4 584 400, 1986 (M. Ootani, S.
125. A. Erdmann, B. Weil, R. Krämer, Appl.
Sano, I. Kusumotu).
Microbiol. Biotechnol. 42 (1994) 604–610. 149. A. M. Vasconcellos, A. L. Neto, D. M.
126. A. Erdmann, B. Weil, R. Krämer, Biotechnol. Grassiano, C. P. De Oliveira, Biotechnol.
Lett. 17 (1995) 927–932. Bioeng. 33 (1989) 1324–1329.
127. R. Krämer, J. Biotechnol. 45 (1996) 1–21. 150. Ajinomoto, US 5 362 635, 1994 (T. Hirose et
128. M. S. N. Jetten, A. J. Sinskey, Crit. Rev. in al.).
Biol. 15 (1995) 73–103. 151. F. Yoshinaga: “Proline,” in K. Aida, I. Chibata,
129. Kyowa Hakko, EP-A 197 335, 1986 (R. K. Nakayama, K. Takinami, H. Yamada (eds.):
Katsumata, T. Mitzukami, T. Oka). Biotechnology of Amino Acid Production,
130. Forsch. Z. Jülich, EP-A 435 132, 1991 (J. Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986,
Cremer, L. Eggeling, H. Sahm). pp. 117–120.
131. Y.-C. Liu, W.-T. Wu, J.-H. Tsao, Bioprocess. 152. M. Sugiura, T. Takagi, M. Kisumi, Abst. 31st
Eng. 9 (1993) 135–139. Symp. Amino Acid and Nucleic Acid (Japan),
132. Eurolysine, EP-A 534 865, 1993 (P. Lucq, C. 1982, p. 10.
Domont). 153. Y. Imai, T. Takagi, M. Sugiura, M. Kisumi,
133. Rhone-Polenc, EP 122 163, 1984 (N. Rouy). Abst. Ann. Meet Agr. Chem. Soc. (Japan),
134. Degussa, EP 533 039, 1993 (W. Binder et al.). 1984, p. 100.
135. Degussa, DE 2 421 167, 1974 (T. Lüßling, K. 154. Y. Izumi et al., Appl. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 39
Müller, G. Schreyer, F. Theissen). (1993) 427–432.
136. W. Leuchtenberger, U. Plöcker: “Amino acids 155. T. Yoshida, T. Mitsunaga, Y. Izumi, J.
and hydroxycarboxylic acids,” in W. Gerhartz Fermentation Bioeng. 75 (1993) 405–408.
(ed.): Enzymes in Industry, Production and 156. H.-Y. Hsiao, T. Wie, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 28
Applications, VCH, Weinheim, Germany (1986) 1510–1518.
1990. 157. Mitsui Toatsu, US 5 382 517, 1995 (D. Ura, T.
137. T. Ishikawa et al., Biosci. Biotech. Biochem. 57 Hashimukai, T. Matsumoto, N. Fukuhara).
158. K. Shimura: “Threonine,” in H. W. Blanch, S.
(1993) 982–986.
Drew, D. I. C. Wang (eds.): Comprehensive
138. Genencor, WO 93/17112, 1993 (J. C.
Biotechnology, vol. 3, Pergamon Press, Oxford
Lievense).
1985.
139. Genex, US 4 598 047, 1986 (J. C. McGuire). 159. S. Nakamori: “Threonine and Homoserine,” in
140. C. T. Evans, C. Coma, W. Petreson, M. K. Aida, I. Chibata, K. Nakayama, K.
Misawa, Biotechnol. Bioeng. 30 (1987) Takinami, H. Yamada (eds.): Progress in
1067–1072. Industrial Microbiology, Kodansha,
141. G. J. Calton et al., Biotechnology 4 (1986) Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986,
317–320. pp. 173–182.
54 Amino Acids
160. Genetics Ind., US 4 278 765, 1981 (V. G. 181. R. F. Barker, D. A. Hopkinson, Ann. Hum.
Debabov et al.). Genet. 41 (1977) 27.
161. Ajinomoto, EP-A 593 792, 1994 (V. G. 182. L. D. Stegink: Clinical Nutrition Update:
Debabov et al.). Amino Acids, Am. Med. Assoc. Publ., Chicago
162. Eurolysine, FR 2 627 508, 1989 (F. Richaud et 1977, pp. 198–205.
al.). 183. K. Schreier, Ärztl. Fortbildung 19 (1971) 107.
163. Ajinomoto, FR 2 588 016, 1987 (M. Ootani, T. 184. U. Porath, K. Schreier, Med. Ernähr. 11 (1970)
Kitahara, K. Akashi). 229.
164. A. Yokota, T. Takao, Agric. Biol. Chem. 48 185. H. Bickel, S. Kaiser-Grubel, Dtsch. Med.
(1984) 2663–2668. Wochenschr. 96 (1971) 1415.
165. Mitsui Toatsu, EP-A 341 674, 1989 (K. 186. Y. Izumi, I. Chibata, T. Itoh, Angew. Chem. 90
Ishiwata et al.). (1978) 187;
166. Mitsui Toatsu, EP-A 438 591, 1991 (S. Ogawa, Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Eng. 17 (1978) 176.
S. Iguichi, S. Morita, H. Kuwamoto). 187. M. S. Sadovnikova, V. M. Belikov, Russ.
167. B. K. Hamilton et al., Trends Biotechnol. 3 Chem. Rev. (Engl. Transl.) 47 (1978) 199.
(1985) 64–68. 188. K. Drauz, A. Kleemann, J. Martens, Angew.
168. J. Plachy, S. Ulbert, Acta Biotechnol. 10 Chem. 94 (1982) 590;
(1990) 517–522. Angew. Chem. Int. Ed. Engl. 21 (1982) 584.
169. Showa Denko, JP 62 186 786, 1987 (E. 189. Winnacker-Küchler, 5th ed., vol. 8, 715.
Takinishi, H. Takamatsu, K. Sakimoto, Y. 190. FAO: Nutritional Studies No. 24, Amino Acid
Yajima). Content of Foods and Biological Data on
170. A. N. Mayeno, G. J. Gleich, TIBTECH 12 Proteins, Interprint (Malta), Rome 1970.
(1994) 346–352. 191. Degussa, unpublished
171. K. Sakimoto, Y. Torigoe, Curr. Prospects Med. 192. W. C. Rose, Nutr. Abstr. Rev. 27 (1957) 631.
Drug Saf. 193. D. M. Hegsted, Fed. Proc. Fed. Am. Soc. Exp.
(1994) 295–311. Biol. 22 (1963) 1424.
172. K. Nakayama: “Tryptophan,” in M. 194. Report of a Joint FAO/WHO Ad Hoc Expert
Moo-Young (ed.): Comprehensive Committee: Energy and Protein Requirements,
Biotechnology, vol. 3, Pergamon Press, Oxford Rome 1973.
1985, 621–631. 195. E. Kofrányi, Ernähr. Umsch. 23 (1976) 205.
173. I. Shiio: “Tryptophan, Phenylalanine, and 196. Dtsch. Ges. für Ernährung: Empfehlungen für
Tyrosine,” in K. Aida, I. Chibata, K. die Nährstoffzufuhr, 3rd ed., Umschau-Verlag,
Nakayama, K. Takinami, H. Yamada (eds.): Frankfurt 1975.
Biotechnology of Amino Acid Production, 197. Dtsch. Ges. Für Ernährung: Referenzwerte für
Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986, die Nährstoffzufuhr, Umschau Buchverlag,
pp. 188–206. Frankfurt 2000.
174. T. K. Maiti, S. P. Chatterje, Hindustan 198. Recommended Dietary Allowances, 9th ed.,
Antibiotics Bulletin 33 (1991) 26–61. Nat. Acad. of Sci., Washington, D.C., 1980.
199. J. J. Otten, J. P. Hellwig, L. D. Meyers (eds.):
175. M. Ikeda, Appl. Microbiol. Biotech. 69 (2006)
Dietary Reference Intakes: the Essential Guide
615.
to Nutrient Requirements, National Academies
176. S. Komatsubara, M. Kisumi: “Isoleucine,
Press, Washington DC 2006.
Valine, and Leucine,” in K. Aida, I. Chibata,
200. G. K. Parman, J. Agric. Food Chem. 16 (1968)
K. Nakayama, K. Takinami, H. Yamada (eds):
169.
Biotechnology of Amino Acid Production,
201. H. H. Ottenheym, P. J. Jenneskens, J. Agric.
Kodansha, Tokyo/Elsevier, Amsterdam 1986,
Food Chem. 18 (1970) 1010.
pp. 131–143.
202. N. S. Scrimshaw, A. M. Altschul: Amino Acid
177. Ajinomoto, EP 287 123, 1993 (N. Katsurada,
Fortification of Protein Foods, MIT Press,
H. Uchibori, T. Tsuchida).
Cambridge, MA 1971.
178. D. A. Bender: Amino Acid Metabolism, J.
203. E. E. Howe, G. R. Jansen, E. W. Gilfilian, Am.
Wiley & Sons, London–New
J. Clin. Nutr. 16 (1965) 315.
York–Sydney–Toronto 1975, p. 2.
204. A. M. Altschul, Nature (London) 248 (1974)
179. H. N. Munro, Drug Intell. Clin. Pharm. 6
643.
(1972) 216.
205. J. Kato, N. Muramatsu, J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc.
180. M. L. Sunde, Poult. Sci. 51 (1972) 44.
48 (1971) 415.
Amino Acids 55
185. A. A. El-Dash, A. A. Johnson, Cereal 270. Ajinomoto Co. Inc.: Amino Acid Link News,
Chem. 47 (1970) 247. L. Wiseblatt, H. F. No. 14 (May 2006). Available at
Zoumut, Cereal Chem. 40 (1963) 162. http://www.ajinomoto.com/ami-
M. Rothe, Ernährungsforschung 5 (1960) 131. noacid/link/E/pdf/Vol.14E.pdf.
255. G. Ziegleder, D. Sandmeier, Dtsch. Lebensm. 271. M. Pack: Amino Acids in Animal Nutrition,
Rundsch. 78 (1982) 315. W. Mohr, E. Coral Sanivet, Bucharest 2002.
Landschreiber, Th. Severin, Fette Seifen 272. M. Kirchgeßner: Tierernährung, 11th ed.,
Anstrichm. 78 (1976) 88. S. Turos, DLG-Verlag, Frankfurt 2004.
US 4346121, 1982. 273. Nutrient Requirements of Poultry, 9th revised
256. E. Cremer, M. Riedmann, Monatsh. Chem. 96 ed., National Academies Press, Washington
(1965) 364. DC 1994.
257. Yuki Gosei Kogyo, US 3478015, 1969 (I. 274. Nutrient Requirements of Swine, 10th revised
Onishi, A. Nishi, T. Kakizawa). ed., National Academies Press, Washington
258. Fuji Oil Co., GB 1357511, 1974; DC 1998.
GB 1488282, 1977. P. L. M. Berende, H.-L. Bertram, Z.
259. Naarden Int., NL 7712745, 1979. Tierphysiol. Tierernähr. Futtermittelk. 49
260. J. A. Newell, M. E. Mason, R. S. Matlock, J. (1983) 30.
Agric. Food Chem. 15 (1967) 767. H.-L. Bertram, P. L. M. Berende, Kraftfutter
261. S.-C. Lee, B. R. Reddy, S. S. Chang, J. Food (1983) 46.
Sci. 38 (1974) 788. Research Corp., 275. Degussa Feed Additives: available at
US 3814818, 1974 (S. S. Chang, B. R. Reddy). http://www.aminoacidsandmore.com.
T. Y. Fan, M. H. Yueh, J. Food Sci. 45 (1980) 276. M. L. Scott, M. C. Nesheim, R. J. Young:
748. P. T. Arroyo, D. A. Lillard, J. Food Sci. 35 Nutrition of the Chicken, 3rd ed., M. L. Scott,
(1970) 769. Ithaka, New York, 1982.
277. W. Prinz, A. Becker, Arch. Geflügelk. 29
262. Yuki Gosei Kogyo, DE 1593733, 1972 (I.
(1965) no. 2, 135.
Onishi et al.).
278. R. Chernoff, J. Am. Diet. Assoc. 79 (1981) 426.
Japan Monopoly, Tanabe Seiyaku, US
M. R. Polk, Am. Pharm. NS 22 (1982) 25.
3722516, 1973 (K. Suwa et al.). 279. W. F. Caspary, Dtsch. Ärztebl. 1978 (2. Febr.)
Philip Morris, US 4306577, 1981 (D. L. S. 243.
Wu, J. W. Swain). H. Kasper, Aktuel. Ernährung 1 (1978) 22.
Reynolds Tobacco, US 3996941, 1976 (C. W. 280. D. M. Matthews, S. A. Adibi,
Miller, J. P. Dickerson, C. E. Rix). Gastroenterology 71 (1976) 151.
263. R. G. Henika, N. E. Rodgers, Cereal Chem. 42 M. T. Lis, R. F. Crampton, D. M. Matthews,
(1965) 397. Br. J. Nutr. 27 (1972) 159.
264. J. M Bruemmer, W. Seibel, H. Stephan, 281. Mead Johnson, US 3091569, 1963;
Getreide Mehl Brot 34 (1980) 173. Patent US 3184505, 1965.
Technology, US 3803326, 1974. J. Geittner, 282. H. A. Smith, G. Gorin, J. Org. Chem. 26
Gordian 79 (1979) 202. (1961) 820.
265. R. Marcuse, Fette Seifen Anstrichm. 63 (1961) 283. A. Kleemann, J. Engel: Pharmaceutical
940. Substances, 4th ed., Thieme Verlag, Stuttgart
266. H. Iwainsky, C. Franzke, Dtsch. Lebensm. 2001.
Rundsch. 52 (1956) 129. 284. Rech. et Propagande Scientif., FR 1288907,
H. Lingnert, C. E. Eriksson, J. Food Process. 1962.
Preserv. 4 (1980) 161. 285. Degussa, US 4129593, 1978.
267. N. Watanabe et al., JP 7314042, 1973; Chem. 286. Drugs of the Future 23 (1998) 374.
Abstr. 79 (1973) 145052 j. 287. M. Bergmann, G. Michalis, Ber. Dtsch. Chem.
268. A. G. Castellani, Appl. Microbiol. 1 (1953) Ges. 63 (1930) 987.
195. Nisshin Flour Milling, JP 7319945, 288. Degussa, DE 1239697, 1963.
1973(G. Ogawa, K. Taguchi); Chem. Abstr. 81 289. May & Baker, GB 845 034, 1957.
(1974) 76689 z. Nippon Kayaku, JP-Kokai 290. B. Witkop et al., J. Am. Chem. Soc. 76 (1954)
81109580, 1981; Chem. Abstr. 95 (1981) 5579.
202313 b. 291. A. J. Morris et al., J. Org. Chem. 22 (1957)
269. US Functional Beverages Market, Frost & 306.
292. E. A. Bell et al., Nature (London) 210 (1966)
Sullivan, London, 2004.
529.
Amino Acids 57
293. Distillers, GB 854339, 1957. 306. G. Schuster, H. Modde, E. Scheld, Seifen Öle
Squibb, US 3281461, 1966. Fette Wachse 38 (1965) 477.
Heyl & Co., DE 2114329, 1971; G. Schuster, H. Modde, Parfüm + Kosmet. 45
DE 2413185, 1974. (1964) 337.
294. Degussa, DE 1795299, 1968; 307. Estee Lauder, US 4005210, 1977 (J.
DE 1795297, 1968; Gubernick).
DE 2032952, 1970; 308. American Cyanamid, US 3988438, 1976.
DE 2123232, 1971; Ajinomoto, DE 2010303, 1970 (R. Yoshida et
DE 2156601, 1971; al.).
DE 2335990, 1973; 309. R. Yoshida, M. Takehara, Chem. Abstr. 84
DE 2138122, 1971; (1976) 6843 h.
DE 2258411, 1972; 310. M. Koyama, J. Dispersion Sci. Tech. 26 (2005)
DE 2304055, 1973. 785.
295. K. Schrader, Am. Cosmet. Perfum. 87 (1972) 311. Dominion Pharmacal., US 4176197, 1979 (B.
49. N. Olson).
S. Tatsumi, Am. Cosmet. Perfum. 87 (1972) 61. L’Oréal, US 4002634, 1977 (G. Kalopissis, C.
O. K. Jacobi, Am. Cosmet. Perfum. 87 (1972) Bouillon).
L’Oréal, GB 1397623, 1975 (G. Kalopissis, G.
35.
Manoussos).
G. Hopf, J. König, G. Padberg, Kosmetologie 4
L’Oréal, DE 1492071, 1965 (G. Kalopissis).
(1971) 132.
312. Mare Corp., US 4201235, 1980 (V. G.
A. Szakall, Arch. Klin. Exp. Dermatol. 201
Ciavatta).
(1955) 331. Unilever, EP 8171, 1981 (G. P. Mathur et al.).
K. Laden, R. Spitzer, J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 18 313. Kyowa Hakko Kogyo, US 4139610, 1979 (Y.
(1967) 351. Miyazaki et al.)
H. W. Spier, G. Pascher, Klin. Wochenschr. 31 Hans Schwarzkopf, DE 958501, 1957 (J.
(1953) 997. Saphir, E. Kramer).
296. Y. Kumano et al., J. Soc. Cosmet. Chem. 28 K. Yoneda et al., DE 2951923, 1979.
(1977) 285. 314. Schuylkill Chem., GB 1516890, 1978.
297. L’Oreál, DE 2807607, 1978 (J.-C. Ser et al.). 315. Procter & Gamble, EP 47650, 1982.
Unilever, DE 2337342, 1973 (G. F. Johnston et Unilever, GB 1597498, 1981 (K. Gosling, M.
al.). R. Hyde).
Orlane Paris, DE 2524297, 1975 (A. Meybeck, 316. Sederma, US 6974799, 2003 (K. Lintner).
H. Noel). 317. Sederma, WO 98/07744, 1998 (D. Greff).
Shiseido, US 4035513, 1977 (Y. Kumano). 318. C. Tomlin (ed.): The Pesticide Manual, 13th
298. E. S. Cooperman, Am. Cosmet. Perfum. 87 ed., British Crop Protection Council, Farnham
(1972) 65. 2003.
Colgate Palmolive, GB 1573529, 1980. 319. B. Hock, C. Fedtke, R. R. Schmidt: Herbizide,
299. Proctor and Gamble: Press Release, 23 August 1st ed., Georg Thieme Verlag Stuttgart 1995.
2004; available at http://www.uk.pg.com. 320. Proc. North. Cent. Weed Control Conf. 26
300. C. R. Robbins: Chemical and Physical (1971) 64.
Behaviour of Human Hair, Springer Verlag, 321. P. Knuuttila, H. Knuuttila, Acta Chem. Scand.
Berlin 1994. 33 (1979) 623.
301. European Markets for Active Ingredients in 322. Agrochemical Service, Wood Mackenzie
Personal Care, Frost & Sullivan, London, Consultants Limited, Edinburgh 1996.
2004. 323. Zeneca, US 4 315 765.
302. M. Takehara et al., J. Am. Oil Chem. Soc. 50 324. Z. Pflanzenkr. Pflanzenschutz (1981)
(1973) 227; Sonderheft IX, 431.
51 (1974) 419. 325. Hoechst, DE-OS 2 717 440, 1976.
326. K. Tachibana et al., Abstr. 5th Int. Congr.
303. Ajinomoto, Kawaken Fine Chemicals, US
Pestic. Chem., IVa Abstract 19.
4273684, 1981 (T. Nagashima et al.)
327. D. W. Ladner, Pestic. Sci. 29 (1990) 341–356.
304. Ajinomoto, GB 1483500, 1977.
328. M. J. Muhitch, D. L. Shaner, M. A. Stidham,
305. Kawaken Fine Chemicals. JP-Kokai
Plant Physiol. 83 (1987) 451–456.
75117806, 1975 (K. Nakazawa);
329. T. Chapman et al., Symp. New. Herbic. 3rd ed.
Chem. Abstr. 84 (1976) 8858 r.
(1969) 40.
58 Amino Acids
330. R. M. Scott et al., Proc. Br. Crop. Prot. 356. Ilford, GB 1378354, 1974 (A. D. Ezekiel).
Conf.–Weeds 2 (1976) 723. Ilford, DE 2316632, 1973 (R. Jefferson).
331. S. O. Duke et al., Pestic. Sci. 40 (1994) 357. Fr. Blasberg & Co., DE 2050870, 1973 (W.
265–277. Immel, W. Adams).
332. N. Mito, R. Sato, M. Miyakado, H. Oshio, S. Yokozawa Chemical Ind., JP 7410572, 1974
Tanaka, Pestic. Biochem. Physiol. 40 (1991) (K. Aoya et al.);
128–135. Chem. Abstr. 81 (1974) 57631 h.
333. Degussa, WO 94/03458, 1994 (M. Schäfer, H. Sony Corp., DE 2325109, 1973 (S. Fueki et
Baier, K. Drauz, H.-P. Krimmer, S. al.).
Landmann). 358. A. Steponavicius, R. Visomirskis,
334. Sumitomo, JP 62 158 280. Electrodepos. Surface Treat. Lausanne 1
335. BASF, DE 409 432, 1994. (1972) 37.
336. BASF, DE 407 023, 1994. 359. F. S. Parker, D. M. Kirschenbaum,
337. American Cyanamid Co., EP 101 098, 1993. Spectrochim. Acta 16 (1960) 910.
338. Bayer, DE 030 062, 1990. M. Tsuboi, T. Takenishi, A. Nakamura,
339. S. Sauza et al., Phytoma–la défense des Spectrochim. Acta 19 (1963) 271.
vegetaux 558 (2003) 51. J. F. Pearson, M. A. Slifkin, Spectrochim. Acta
340. Y. Miyake et al., Nippon Noyaku Gakkaishi 30 Part A 28 (1972) 2403.
(2005) 390. 360. C. S. Tsai et al., Can. J. Biochem. 53 (1975)
341. P. A. Urech, Proc. Br. Crop. Prot. Conf.–Pests no. 9, 1005.
Dis. 2 (1977) 623. 361. H. Hagenmeyer et al., Z. Naturforsch. B:
342. Garavaglia et al.: Atti Simp. Chim. Anorg. Chem. Org. Chem. 25 B (1970), 681.
Antiparassitari, 3rd, Piacenza 1981. 362. C. Cooper, W. Packer, K. Williams: Amino
343. C. A. Henrick et al., Pestic. Sci. 11 (1980) 224. Acid Analysis Protocols, Methods in
344. C. A. Porter, L. E. Ahlrichs, Hawaii Sugar Molecular Biology Series, 159, Humana Press,
Tech. Rep. 1971 30 (1972) 71. Totowa, NJ 2000.
345. Ciba Geigy, EP 18948, 1980. 363. W. S. Hancock: Handbook for the Separation
346. Emori Shoji, JP 78097022, 1978. of Amino Acids, Peptides and Proteins, vol. 1,
347. Dainichi Seika Kogy, JP 78079990, 1978. CRC Press, Boca Raton, FL, 1984.
348. L. Mueller, Zem. Kalk Gips 27 (1974) 69. 364. E. Scoffone, A. Fontana, Mol. Biol. Biochem.
349. Ajinomoto, DE 2533136, 1975 (R. Yoshida et Biophys. 8 (1970) 185.
al.). 365. M. Roth, Anal. Chem. 43 (1971) 880.
350. Kyowa Fermentation, GB 1400741, 1975. J. R. Benson, P. E. Hare, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci.
Honny Chemicals, GB 1402758, 1975 (Y. USA 72 (1975) 619.
Nakagoshi). 366. E. Bayer et al., Anal. Chem. 48 (1976) 1106.
Kyowa Hakko Kogyo, DE 2229488, 1972 (Y. 367. S. Udenfried et al., Science (Washington, D.C.)
Fujimoto et al.). 178 (1972) 871.
Toyo Cloth, US 3676206, 1972 (K. Nishitani 368. I. Molnár-Perl: Quantitation of Amino Acids
et al.). and Amines by Chromatography, Elsevier,
351. Sanyo Trading Co., DE 2716758, 1977 (M. Oxford, 2005.
369. C. Haworth, R. W. A. Oliver, J. Chromatogr.
Onizawa, S. Ohmiya).
64 (1972) 305.
352. Ajinomoto, JP 81035179, 1981.
E. Stahl: Dünnschichtchromatographie,
Ajinomoto, JP-Kokai 7522801, 1975 (T. Saito
Springer Verlag, Berlin 1967, p. 701.
et al.);
A. R. Fahmy et al., Helv. Chim. Acta 44 (1959)
Chem. Abstr. 84 (1976) 33494 b.
245.
353. Sanyo Trading Co., DE 2602988, 1976;
370. M. Kubota et al., Anal. Biochem. 64 (1975)
US 4069213, 1978;
no. 2, 494.
DE 2604053, 1976 (M. Onizawa);
K. D. Kulbe, Anal. Biochem. 44 (1970) 548.
DE 2658693, 1976 (M. Onizawa, S. Ohmiya).
P. A. Laursen, Biochem. Biophys. Res.
354. R. M. Saleh, A. M. Shams El Din, Corros. Sci.
Commun. 37 (1969) 663.
12 (1972) 688.
371. A. Wolf, Prax. Naturwiss. Chem. 23 (1974)
355. Ajinomoto, JP-Kokai 7426145, 1974 (Y. Kita
no. 3, 74.
et al.);
372. H. Nakamura, J. J. Pisano, J. Chromatogr. 121
Chem. Abstr. 81 (1974) 53195 w.
(1976) 33.
Amino Acids 59
413. K. Brown: Amino Acids: Highlighting (1974) 55. W. Braun, Strahlentherapie 108
Synthesis Applications, Business (1959) 262. H. Gutbrod et al., Acta Hepatol. 5
Communications Co. Inc., Norwalk, CT 2005. (1957) no. 1/2, 1. I. Petersone et al., Eksp. Klin.
414. H. N. Munro, Adv. Exp. Med. Biol. 105 (1978) Farmakoter. 3 (1972) 5. D. G. Gallo, A. L.
119. Sheffner, DE 2018599, 1971. Transbronchin,
415. A. E. Harper, N. J. Benevenga, R. M. Homburg Pharma, Frankfurt 1971.
Wohlhueter, Physiol. Rev. 50 (1970) 428. L. Bonanomi, A. Gazzaniga, Therapiewoche
416. R. G. Daniel, H. A. Waisman, Growth 32 30 (1980) 1926. W. F. Riker, H. Gold, J. Am.
(1968) 255. Pharm. Assoc. 31 (1942) 306.
417. H. E. Sauberlich, J. Nutr. 75 (1961) 61. 421. G. Maffii, G. Schott, M. G. Serralunga, Res.
418. K. Lang: Biochemie der Ernährung, 4th ed.,
Prog. Org. Biol. Med. Chem. 2 (1970) 262.
Steinkopff, Darmstadt 1979.
422. Y. Kawaguchi et al., Iyakuhin Kenkyu 11
419. Y. Peng et al., J. Nutr. 103 (1973) 608.
420. Degussa, unpublished, 1973 and 1983. R. J. (1980) 635. Kaken Chemical, JP 52083940,
Breglia, C. O. Ward, C. I. Jarowski, J. Pharm. 1976 (S. Suzuki). P. Gullino et al., Arch.
Sci. 62 (1973) 49. P. Gullino et al., Arch. Biochem. Biophys. 64 (1956) 319. Degussa,
Biochem. Biophys. 58 (1955) 253. O. Strubelt, unpublished, 1981 and 1982. E.-J. Kirnberger
C.-P. Siegers, A. Schütt, Arch. Toxicol. 33 et al., Arzneim. Forsch. 8 (1958) 72.