Rating Table for Performance Indicators Rating Table for Personal Traits

Numerical Rating Rating Criteria Numerical Rating Points of Traits

5 Exceeds standards
4 Always meet Standards
3 Ocassionally meet standards
2 Seldom meets standards
1 Never meet standards
5 Nine (9) to Ten (10)
4 Seven (7) to Eight (8)
3 Five (5) to Six (6)
2 Three (3) to Four (4)
1 One (1) to Two (2)

(NOTE: Refer to this table for Parts II and I) (NOTE: Refer to this table for Part III)

NPR-APR Table
Adjectival
Numerical Performance
Performance Rating
Rating (NPR)
(APR)

91-100 Outstanding (OS)

81-90.99 Very Satisfactory (VS)
71-80.99 Satisfactory (SF)
70.99 & below Poor (PR)

(NOTE: Refer to this table to get the Equivalent APR)

 POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR PO1 TO PO3 (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period : July to December 2016
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank

(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)

3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District

5. Years and Months in Current Position:

Point Numerical Weighted
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 7 x =
b. Timeliness of work 6 x =
I. Output (25 pts)
c. Acceptability of output based on standard 6 x =
d. Accomplishment of target 6 x =

a. Understanding of the job description 2 x =

b. Awareness of the Vision, mission and objectives of the
2 x =
organization
c. Community Oriented Policing System 5 x =
Job Knowledge d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x =
(25 points)
e. Analytical Ability 2 x =
f. Ability to solve problems/troubleshooting 2 x =
g. Oral and written communication 5 x =
II. C O R E C O M P E T E N C I E S

h. Law enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 5 x =

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 3 x =

Work b. Compliance with and Implementation of Policies/SOPs 3 x =
Management c. Sense of Priority 2 x =
d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x =
(15 points) e. Cost of effectiveness 2 x =
f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x =

a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 3 x =
Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 3 x =
Relationship c. Build Linkages and networks 3 x =
(15 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 3 x =
e. Motivation 3 x =

Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x =

Organization b. Preservation of Unit Interest 3 x =
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x =

Personal Trait Personal Trait

Morally Upright Civic-minded
Personal Honest Responsible
10.0 x =
III. Qualities Well groomed Disciplined
(10 points) Fair and Just Courteous/tactful
Loyal to the organization Initiate positive action
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE (TWS)
NUMERICAL PERFORMACE RATING (NPR) = TWS ÷ 5
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table)
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represents my best judgment. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT
recommend this personnel be granted (a) promotion (b) designation to higher position (c) relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s)

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

____________________________________ _________________________________ ______________________________

Rater Ratee Reviewer
Date: Date: Date:
(IF REFERRED TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head, Grievance Committee
 POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR SPO1 TO SPO2 (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period : July to December 2016
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank

(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)

3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District

5. Years and Months in Current Position:

Point Numerical Weighted
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS
Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 5 x =
b. Timeliness of work 3 x =
I. Output (15 pts)
c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x =
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x =

a. Understanding of the job description 2 x =

b. Awareness of the Vision, mission and objectives of the
2 x =
organization
c. Community Oriented Policing System 4 x =
Job Knowledge d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x =
(20 points)
e. Analytical Ability 2 x =
f. Ability to solve problems/troubleshooting 2 x =
g. Oral and written communication 4 x =
II. C O R E C O M P E T E N C I E S

h. Law enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x =

a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 5 x =

b. Compliance with and Implementation of Policies/SOPs
Work Management 4 x =
(25 c. Sense of Priority 4 x =
points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x =
e. Cost of effectiveness 4 x =
f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x =

a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 4 x =
Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 4 x =
Relationship c. Build Linkages and networks 4 x =
(20 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 4 x =
e. Motivation 4 x =

Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 3 x =

Organization b. Preservation of Unit Interest 3 x =
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x =

Personal Trait Personal Trait

Morally Upright Civic-minded
Personal Qualities Honest Responsible
10.0 x =
III. Well groomed Disciplined
(10 points) Fair and Just Courteous/tactful
Loyal to the organization Initiate positive action
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE (TWS)
NUMERICAL PERFORMACE RATING (NPR) = TWS ÷ 5
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table)
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represents my best judgment. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT
recommend this personnel be granted (a) promotion (b) designation to higher position (c) relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s)

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

____________________________________ _________________________________ ______________________________

Rater Ratee Reviewer
Date: Date: Date:
(IF REFERRED TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head, Grievance Committee
 POLICE NON-COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR SPO3 TO SPO4 (THIRD LEVEL)
Rating Period : July to December 2016
PNCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank

Conzaga Ronald Viray Senior Police Officer IV
(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)
3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District
RESPO PROCOR
5. Years and Months in Current Position: 5 years and 3 months
Point Numerical Weighted
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 5 x = 0
b. Timeliness of work 3 x = 0
I. Output (15 pts)
c. Acceptability of output based on standard 4 x = 0
d. Accomplishment of target 3 x = 0

a. Understanding of the job description 2 x = 0

b. Awareness of the Vision, mission and objectives of the
2 x =
organization 0
c. Community Oriented Policing System 2 x = 0
Job Knowledge d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 1 x = 0
(15 points)
e. Analytical Ability 2 x = 0
f. Ability to solve problems/troubleshooting 2 x = 0
II. C O R E C O M P E T E N C I E S

g. Oral and written communication 2 x = 0

h. Law enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x = 0
a. Records Management & Submission of Reports 4 x = 0
b. Compliance with and Implementation of Policies/SOPs
Work Management 4 x = 0
c. Sense of Priority 4 x = 0
(25 points) d. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 4 x = 0
e. Cost of effectiveness 5 x = 0
f. Involvement/Presence in Activities 4 x = 0
a. Receptive to ideas/suggestions 5 x = 0
Interpersonal b. Teamwork Management 5 x = 0
Relationship c. Build Linkages and networks 5 x = 0
(25 points) d. Ability to lead and follow 5 x = 0
e. Motivation 5 x = 0

Concern for the a. Stewardship of unit's properties 4 x = 0

Organization b. Preservation of Unit Interest 3 x = 0
(10 points) c. Coordination 3 x = 0

Personal Trait Personal Trait

Morally Upright ⁄ Civic-minded ⁄
Personal Qualities Honest ⁄ Responsible ⁄
III. Well groomed ⁄ Disciplined ⁄ 10 x = 0
(10 points) Fair and Just ⁄ Courteous/tactful ⁄
Loyal to the organization ⁄ Initiate positive action ⁄
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE (TWS) 0
NUMERICAL PERFORMACE RATING (NPR) = TWS ÷ 5 0
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table)
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represents my best judgment. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT
recommend this personnel be granted (a) promotion (b) designation to higher position (c) relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s)
Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

_____________________________ _____________________________ ___________________________

Rater Ratee Reviewer
Date: Date: Date:
(IF REFERRED TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head, Grievance Committee
 POLICE COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR INSPECTOR TO SENIOR INSPECTOR (FIRST LEVEL)
Rating Period : July to December 2016
PCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank

(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)

3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District

5. Years and Months in Current Position:

Point Numerical Weighted
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 5 x =
I. Output (15 pts) b. Timeliness of work 5 x =
c. Quantity of Work 5 x =
a. Decision-making 2 x =
b. Planning 2 x =
c. Implementation of Instructions 2 x =
d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 1 x =
Job Knowledge e. Analytical Ability 1 x =
(15 points)
f. Problem Solving/troubleshooting 1 x =
g. Oral and written communication 1 x =
II. C O R E C O M P E T E N C I E S

h. Community Oriented Policing 3 x =

i. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x =
a. Control of Activities 4 x =
b. Cost Control 3 x =
Supervisory c. Records Management and Submission of Reports 4 x =
Control d. Compliance with & Implementation of Policies/SOPs 4 x =
(25
points) e. Sense of Priority 4 x =
f. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x =
g. Involvement/Presence in Activities 3 x =
a. Motivation 5 x =
b. Workgroup Management 4 x =
People c. Work Organization/Delegation 4 x =
Management
d. Interpersonal Relations 4 x =
(25 points)
e. Promoting Personnel Development 4 x =
f. Training of Subordinates 4 x =
Organizational a. Housekeeoing and Safety/Security Consciousness 3 x =
Responsiveness b. Preservation of Unit Properties/Interest 3 x =
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x =
Personal Trait Personal Trait
Morally Upright Fair & Just
Personal Honest Civic-minded
Qualities 10.0 x =
III. Loyal Well-groomed
(10
points) Initiate Positive Action(s) Responsible
Dedicated to Service Courteous
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE (TWS)
NUMERICAL PERFORMACE RATING (NPR) = TWS ÷ 5
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table)
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represents my best judgment. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT
recommend this personnel be granted (a) promotion (b) designation to higher position (c) relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s)

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

____________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________________

Rater Ratee Reviewer
Date: Date: Date:
(IF REFERRED TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head, Grievance Committee
 POLICE COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR CHIEF INSPECTOR TO SUPERINTENDENT (SECOND LEVEL)
Rating Period : July to December 2016
PCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank

(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)

3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District

5. Years and Months in Current Position:

Point Numerical Weighted
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Allocation Rating Score
a. Quality of work 7 x =
I. Output (20 pts) b. Timeliness of work 7 x =
c. Quantity of Work 6 x =
a. Decision-making 3 x =
b. Planning 3 x =
c. Implementation of Instructions 3 x =
d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x =
Job Knowledge e. Analytical Ability 3 x =
(25 points)
f. Problem Solving/troubleshooting 3 x =
g. Oral and written communication 3 x =
II. C O R E C O M P E T E N C I E S

h. Community Oriented Policing 3 x =

i. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and 2 x =
Order
a. Control of Activities 4 x =
b. Cost Control 3 x =
Supervisory c. Records Management and Submission of Reports 4 x =
Control d. Compliance with & Implementation of Policies/SOPs 4 x =
(25 points) e. Sense of Priority 4 x =
f. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 3 x =
g. Involvement/Presence in Activities 3 x =
a. Motivation 2 x =
b. Workgroup Management 2 x =
People c. Work Organization/Delegation 2 x =
Management
d. Interpersonal Relations 2 x =
(10 points)
e. Promoting Personal Development 1 x =
f. Training of Subordinates 1 x =
a. Housekeeping and Safety/Security Consciousness 3 x =
Organizational
Responsiveness b. Preservation of Unit Properties/Interest 3 x =
c. Coordination (10 points) 4 x =
Personal Trait Personal Trait
Morally Upright Fair & Just
Personal Qualities Honest Civic-minded
10.0 x =
III. Loyal Well-groomed
(10 points) Initiate Positive Action(s) Responsible
Dedicated to Service Courteous
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE (TWS)
NUMERICAL PERFORMACE RATING (NPR) = TWS ÷ 5
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table)
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represents my best judgment. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT
recommend this personnel be granted (a) promotion (b) designation to higher position (c) relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s)

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

____________________________________ _________________________________ _____________________________

Rater Ratee Reviewer
Date: Date: Date:
(IF REFERRED TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head, Grievance Committee
 POLICE COMMISSIONED OFFICER PERFORMANCE EVALUATION REPORT
FOR SENIOR SUPERINTENDENT UP (THIRD LEVEL)
Rating Period : July to December 2016
PCOPERF 1A (Rating Summary Form)

1. Ratee's Name 2. Rank

(Last Name) (Given Name) (Middle Name)

3. Position/Designation 4. Unit Assignment/Station/District

5. Years and Months in Current Position:

Point Numerical Weighted
PARTS DIMENSIONS PERFORMANCE INDICATORS Score
Allocation Rating
a. Quality of work 9 x =
I. Output (25 pts) b. Timeliness of work 9 x =
c. Quantity of Work 7 x =
a. Decision-making 4 x =
b. Planning 3 x =
c. Implementation of Instructions 3 x =
d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 2 x =
Job Knowledge e. Analytical Ability 3 x =
(25 points)
f. Problem Solving/troubleshooting 3 x =
g. Oral and written communication 3 x =
II. C O R E C O M P E T E N C I E S

h. Community Oriented Policing 2 x =

i. Law Enforcement and Maintenance of Law and Order 2 x =
a. Control of Activities 4 x =
b. Cost Control 3 x =
Supervisory c. Records Management and Submission of Reports 3 x =
Control d. Creativity/Resourcefulness 3 x =
(20
points) e. Sense of Priority 3 x =
f. Client Satisfaction/Orientation 2 x =
g. Involvement/Presence in Activities 2 x =
a. Motivation 2 x =
b. Workgroup Management 2 x =
People c. Work Organization/Delegation 2 x =
Management
d. Interpersonal Relations 2 x =
(10 points)
e. Promoting Personal Development 1 x =
f. Training of Subordinates 1 x =
Organizational a. Housekeeping and Safety/Security Consciousness 3 x =
Responsiveness b. Preservation of Unit Properties/Interest 3 x =
(10 points) c. Coordination 4 x =
Personal Trait Personal Trait
Morally Upright Fair & Just
Personal Qualities Honest Civic-minded
10.0 x =
III. Loyal Well-groomed
(10 points) Initiate Positive Action(s) Responsible
Dedicated to Service Courteous
Nr of Traits with Check Marks
TOTAL WEIGHTED SCORE (TWS)
NUMERICAL PERFORMACE RATING (NPR) = TWS ÷ 5
EQUIVALENT ADJECTIVAL PERFORMANCE RATING (APR) (Please refer to NPR-APR Table)
Rater's Assessment of Ratee: I certify that this report represents my best judgment. [ ] I DO [ ] I DO NOT
recommend this personnel be granted (a) promotion (b) designation to higher position (c) relief.
This personnel needs improvement on the following:

Significant/Critical Incident(s)

Acknowledged: Conformed: Attested:

____________________________________ _________________________________ ________________________________

Rater Ratee Reviewer
Date: Date: Date:
(IF REFERRED TO THE GRIEVANCE COMMITTEE)

I certify that this report was referred to the Grievance Committee for review and evaluation.

Signature
Head, Grievance Committee