Introduction to Pressure Relief Valve Design Part 2 – Relief Scenarios and the Relief Rate – Smart Process Design

Chemical Engineering Blog | Smart Process Design

Vessel Design Software

EN13445, ASME VIII, AD2000, PD5500 EN1591 and more, download trial
now

Relief Plan Back Relief IBS Relief Gerd Relief Cold Relief

Introduction to Pressure Relief Valve

Design Part 2 – Relief Scenarios and the
Relief Rate
2009 NOVEMBER 17

by admin tags: external fire, overpressure, pressure relief valve, runaway reaction,
thermal expansion

This is the second in a set of articles introducing the basics of pressure relief valve design from a
process designer’s viewpoint. Read Part 1 here or Part 3 here.

Once you have decided to add a relief valve, know what equipment and pipes it is protecting, and
choose the set pressure, you can finally begin to size the valve. The first step, and often the most
difficult, is to determine all the different relief scenarios, also called contingencies. A scenario is an
event that causes overpressure. You as a designer need to check out all the possible scenarios.

Fire is an extrememly common cause of overprotection you must design against. Photo taken by
Kirrus at Flickr licensed CC-by-SA.

Here is a list of a few scenarios to consider:

External fire heats up the contents of pipes or vessels. You need to determine how much of the
vessel is engulfed in the flames what liquid level (if any) is present. If you have liquid boiling off
you may have a dynamic calculation on your hands. Insulation plays a part. API 521 has some
equations you can use to model a fire and also and gives you fire dimensions you can usually
assume. (In general one considers up to a 25 ft high fire, in a 2500 square feet pool, as a maximum
for most relief valve and flare header sizing)

A valve is closed, causing a pump or compressor to keep pushing into a non-flowing or “dead”
zone. The equipment may keep pushing and increasing the pressure until something breaks,
especially if it’s a positive displacement pump. (Centrifugal pumps can only push so far before they
“dead head” – at max, they will output the pressure that their pump curve says at a flowrate of
zero).

A heat exchanger stops working (maybe the cooling tower goes down or a valve gets closed),
causing pressure to rise

A reaction goes out of control, aka a “runaway” reaction

Too much hot fluid is supplied to a heat exchanger

Too much fuel is supplied to a fired heater

A control failure or human error opens or closes something at the wrong time. Be creative to
consider what problems could reasonably occur

Instrument air fails

http://smartprocessdesign.com/introduction-pressure-relief-valve-design-part-2-relief-scenarios-relief-rate/[2010/6/13 下午 09:25:41]
Introduction to Pressure Relief Valve Design Part 2 – Relief Scenarios and the Relief Rate – Smart Process Design Chemical Engineering Blog | Smart Process Design

Power failures

The tube in a heat exchanger fails suddenly

Thermal expansion of liquid. (example: a piece of pipe is closed at both ends when full of liquid.
Then the sun comes out and heats the pipe, causing the liquid to expand and increasing the
pressure). It is a mistake to ignore this problem because for liquids it is very significant. Plus, the
nice thing about this scenario is that the relief valves are usually tiny. Sometimes when you cannot
figure any plausible scenario you just buy a ¾”x ¾” thermal expansion valve just in case.

To get other ideas, read any company standards you have. Brainstorm through what can go wrong.
If you have a book about designing equipment (like a distillation tower design book) the book may
have a section of relief scenarios that can come up. When you do safety studies like HAZOP
meetings make sure that you’ve covered every scenario.

See also Common Overpressure Sources, Protect Plants Against Overpressure.

In general, when making up these scenarios you want to avoid double jeopardy. This means that you
do not assume that two totally unrelated mistakes occur at the same time. For example, if I can lose
instrument air, assuming that two air-powered  control valves fail at the same time is plausible because
they both have the same cause of failure. But you would not assume that a control valve fails at the
exact same time as a heat exchanger tube ruptures: this is so implausible that normally you do not have
to design for it. (However, use your judgment: if you think it’s possible, and also very deadly, you might
design for a double jeopardy case at your discretion). Read this for a longer discussion:
http://www.cheresources.com/asiseeit2.shtml

For each scenario you have to determine the conditions at which the fluid will have to be relieved, the
flowrate developed, and also calculate the fluid conditions so you can design the relief valve and piping.
This can be the toughest part of all. Some guidance can be found in standards: API 521 will help you
with fire, and many oil companies have standards for other scenarios. You can also try reading
magazine articles.

In some cases, you have to do a calculation or a process simulation. If you can do dynamic simulation,
where performance is calculated as changing over time, you can often get more accurate then using
steady-state simulation to approximate a relief condition. In some scenarios it is really necessary to do a
dynamic calculation when it is not clear what is the most dangerous part of a relief scenario. If you only
have a steady-state simulator, it may be possible to alter the steady-state model to create several
“snapshots in time” to properly evaluate all the dynamically changing conditions.

As an example, if a multi-component liquid mixture is in a drum, and a drum is heated by a pool fire
beneath it, the situation is not simple. The lighter components will boil off first, followed by the heavier
components. The different fluid compositions have different properties and different latent heats of
vapourization. So you may decide to get the fluid properties at the start of the fire, when the first wisps
of vapour boil off. But also look at when 10% of the liquid has been boiled off, 20%, 30%, …, 100%; you
do however many scenarios it takes for you to get a good feel for all the possible fluid compositions that
your relief valve will have to face. (See Designing for pressure releases during fires – Part 2 by S.
Rahimi Mofrad & S. Norouzi from the magazine Hydrocarbon Processing Dec 2007)

If necessary, you can add appropriate design margins onto your scenarios to reflect your level of
certainty and comfort. (Sometimes companies will invest in things like dynamic simulators just to let
them avoid making conservative, simplifying assumptions that lead to unnecessarily large design
factors). If you’re really not sure what to do, get help. Hire experts if need be.

Edit 2010-04-22: Minor rewrite for clarity.

Remember you can read Part 1 here or Part 3 here. Coming later in this series: Designing Inlet and
Outlet Piping, and miscellaneous topics for further study.

http://smartprocessdesign.com/introduction-pressure-relief-valve-design-part-2-relief-scenarios-relief-rate/[2010/6/13 下午 09:25:41]
Introduction to Pressure Relief Valve Design Part 2 – Relief Scenarios and the Relief Rate – Smart Process Design Chemical Engineering Blog | Smart Process Design

high pressure valveSaihua Solids Processing Valves

We engaged in plant boiler water treatment Eliminate bridging and jamming. Severe and
equipment,+86-13372177901 sanitary applications.
h i G V l

Popularity: 42% [?]

Related posts:

1. Introduction to Pressure Relief Valve Design Part 1 – Types & Set Pressure

2. Introduction to Pressure Relief Valve Design Part 3 – Sizing Orifices and Piping

3. Consider Finned Tubes to Increase Surface Area

4. Free Heat Transfer and Heat Exchanger Textbooks

5. Aspentech’s Hysys: Fluid Package (Thermodynamics) Notes

 Print This Post

from → Relief (Valves, Scenarios)

No comments yet

Leave a Reply

Name :

Email :

Website:

Comment:

Note: You can use basic XHTML in your comments. Your email address will never be published.

Subscribe to this comment feed via RSS

Preview

Click the "Preview" button to preview your comment here.

Spam protection by WP Captcha-Free
Submit Comment

http://smartprocessdesign.com/introduction-pressure-relief-valve-design-part-2-relief-scenarios-relief-rate/[2010/6/13 下午 09:25:41]