General Linear Model: Failure load (N) versus a/w ratio; Thickness (mm)

Method
Factor coding (1; 0)

Factor Information
Factor Type Levels Values
a/w ratio Fixed 3 0,3; 0,4; 0,5
Width (mm) Fixed 3 20; 25; 30
Thickness (mm) Fixed 3 7; 10; 12

Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
a/w ratio 2 22022 11011 4,33 0,188
Width (mm) 2 13422 6711 2,64 0,275
Thickness (mm) 2 93756 46878 18,42 0,051
Error 2 5089 2544
Total 8 134289

Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
50,4425 96,21% 84,84% 23,26%

Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant 624,4 44,5 14,04 0,005
a/w ratio
0,4 -30,0 41,2 -0,73 0,542 1,33
0,5 -116,7 41,2 -2,83 0,105 1,33
Width (mm)
25 60,0 41,2 1,46 0,282 1,33
30 93,3 41,2 2,27 0,152 1,33
Thickness (mm)
10 123,3 41,2 2,99 0,096 1,33
12 250,0 41,2 6,07 0,026 1,33
Regression Equation
Failure = 624,4 + 0,0 a/w ratio_0,3 - 30,0 a/w ratio_0,4 - 116,7 a/w ratio_0,5
load (N) + 0,0 Width (mm)_20 + 60,0 Width (mm)_25 + 93,3 Width (mm)_30
+ 0,0 Thickness (mm)_7 + 123,3 Thickness (mm)_10 + 250,0 Thickness (mm)_12

General Linear Model: Fracture toughness MPA

m^0,5 ... ickness (mm)
Method
Factor coding (1; 0)
Factor Information
Factor Type Levels Values
a/w ratio Fixed 3 0,3; 0,4; 0,5
Width (mm) Fixed 3 20; 25; 30
Thickness (mm) Fixed 3 7; 10; 12
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
a/w ratio 2 1963,4 981,69 8,92 0,101
Width (mm) 2 186,8 93,42 0,85 0,541
Thickness (mm) 2 1524,5 762,24 6,93 0,126
Error 2 220,0 110,01
Total 8 3894,7
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
10,4884 94,35% 77,40% 0,00%
Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant 141,06 9,25 15,25 0,004
a/w ratio
0,4 24,79 8,56 2,89 0,102 1,33
0,5 35,22 8,56 4,11 0,054 1,33
Width (mm)
25 -2,49 8,56 -0,29 0,799 1,33
30 -10,67 8,56 -1,25 0,339 1,33
Thickness (mm)
 10 -25,52 8,56 -2,98 0,097 1,33
12 -29,31 8,56 -3,42 0,076 1,33
Regression Equation
Fracture toughness MPA = 141,06 + 0,0 a/w ratio_0,3 + 24,79 a/w ratio_0,4
m^0,5 + 35,22 a/w ratio_0,5 + 0,0 Width (mm)_20
- 2,49 Width (mm)_25
- 10,67 Width (mm)_30 + 0,0 Thickness (mm)_7
- 25,52 Thickness (mm)_10
- 29,31 Thickness (mm)_12

Response Surface Regression: Failure load (N)

versus a/w ... ness (mm)
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Model 5 130789 26158 22,42 0,014
Linear 2 111310 55655 47,70 0,005
a/w ratio 1 17560 17560 15,05 0,030
Thickness (mm) 1 93750 93750 80,35 0,003
Square 2 3009 1505 1,29 0,394
a/w ratio*a/w ratio 1 1606 1606 1,38 0,325
Thickness (mm)*Thickness (mm) 1 1404 1404 1,20 0,353
2-Way Interaction 1 15011 15011 12,87 0,037
a/w ratio*Thickness (mm) 1 15011 15011 12,87 0,037
Error 3 3500 1167
Total 8 134289
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
34,1572 97,39% 93,05% 67,16%
Coded Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant 742,8 26,3 28,28 0,000
a/w ratio -54,3 14,0 -3,88 0,030 1,01
Thickness (mm) 125,0 13,9 8,96 0,003 1,01
a/w ratio*a/w ratio -28,3 24,2 -1,17 0,325 1,00
Thickness (mm)*Thickness (mm) 27,8 25,3 1,10 0,353 1,01
a/w ratio*Thickness (mm) -60,9 17,0 -3,59 0,037 1,01
Regression Equation in Uncoded Units
Failure load = -492 + 4036 a/w ratio + 62,9 Thickness (mm)
(N) - 2833 a/w ratio*a/w ratio
+ 4,44 Thickness (mm)*Thickness (mm)
- 243,4 a/w ratio*Thickness (mm)

Response Surface Regression: Fracture toughness

MPA ... ckness (mm)
Analysis of Variance
Source DF Adj SS Adj MS F-Value P-Value
Model 5 3504,22 700,84 5,38 0,098
Linear 2 3164,70 1582,35 12,16 0,036
a/w ratio 1 1876,38 1876,38 14,42 0,032
Thickness (mm) 1 1288,32 1288,32 9,90 0,051
Square 2 227,36 113,68 0,87 0,502
a/w ratio*a/w ratio 1 103,06 103,06 0,79 0,439
Thickness (mm)*Thickness (mm) 1 124,30 124,30 0,95 0,401
2-Way Interaction 1 16,35 16,35 0,13 0,746
a/w ratio*Thickness (mm) 1 16,35 16,35 0,13 0,746
Error 3 390,50 130,17
Total 8 3894,72
Model Summary
S R-sq R-sq(adj) R-sq(pred)
11,4090 89,97% 73,26% 5,16%
Coded Coefficients
Term Coef SE Coef T-Value P-Value VIF
Constant 138,54 8,77 15,79 0,001
a/w ratio 17,74 4,67 3,80 0,032 1,01
Thickness (mm) -14,65 4,66 -3,15 0,051 1,01
a/w ratio*a/w ratio -7,18 8,07 -0,89 0,439 1,00
Thickness (mm)*Thickness (mm) 8,27 8,46 0,98 0,401 1,01
a/w ratio*Thickness (mm) -2,01 5,67 -0,35 0,746 1,01
Regression Equation in Uncoded Units
Fracture toughness MPA = 97 + 828 a/w ratio - 27,8 Thickness (mm)
m^0,5 - 718 a/w ratio*a/w ratio
+ 1,32 Thickness (mm)*Thickness (mm)
- 8,0 a/w ratio*Thickness (mm)
 Surface Plot of Failure load (N) vs Thickness (mm); a/w ratio

1000

Failure load (N)

800

12

600
10
0 ,3
Thick ness ( mm)
8
0 ,4
a/w ratio 0 ,5

Surface Plot of Fracture toughness MPA m^0,5 vs a/w ratio; Thickness (

160
toughness M PA m^0,5
140

120
0 ,5
100
0 ,4
8 a/w ratio
10
0 ,3
Thick ness ( mm) 12