Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Writing
Debapriya Basu
Definitions
• Are not set in stone. They may appear to be
incontrovertible. They are also deeply
historicized constructs: they arise from the
knowledge and culture of their time and can
change or adapt with new developments.
• E. g.
– The atom is the smallest particle of matter
– Quarks and leptons are the smallest particle of matter
or
– The sun is a heavenly body that goes round the earth
– The earth is a planet that goes round the sun
Changes in the perception and meaning of definitions
lead to revolutions. We will return to this point later.
Literature
literature
ˈlɪt(ə)rətʃə/
noun
noun: literature; plural noun: literatures
Late Middle English (in the sense ‘knowledge of books’): via French
from Latin litteratura, from littera books and writings published on a
particular s(‘letter’)
• ubject. E. g. "the literature on environmental epidemiology“
• leaflets and other printed matter used to advertise products or give
advice. Eg. "advertising and promotional literature“
AND
• written works, especially those considered of superior or lasting
artistic merit. Eg. "a great work of literature"
Factors determining Labels
• Historical background
• The image that the word provokes
‘It is admitted, on all sides, that the Metaphysical and Moral Sciences
are falling into decay, while the Physical are engrossing, every day,
more respect and attention [. . . .] This condition of the two great
departments of knowledge ; the outer, cultivated exclusively on
mechanical principles--the inward finally abandoned, because,
cultivated on such principles, it is found to yield no result--sufficiently
indicates the intellectual bias of our time, its all-pervading disposition
towards that line of enquiry. In fact, an inward persuasion has long
been diffusing itself, and now and then even comes to utterance, that
except the external, there are no true sciences ; that to the inward
world (if there be any) our only conceivable road is through the
outward; that, in short, what cannot be investigated and understood
mechanically, cannot be investigated and understood at all.’
– Thomas Carlyle, Edinburgh Review (1829)
Scientist 3
The opposite point of view:
‘It has become the permitted fashion among modern
mathematicians, chemists, and apothecaries, to call
themselves 'scientific men,' as opposed to theologians,
poets, and artists. They know their sphere to be a
separate one ; but their ridiculous notion of its being a
peculiarly scientific one ought not to be allowed in our
Universities. There is a science of Morals, a science of
History, a science of Grammar, a science of Music, and a
science of Painting ; and all these are quite beyond
comparison higher fields for human intellect, and require
accuracies of intenser observation, than either chemistry,
electricity, or geology.’
John Ruskin, Ariadne florentina (1874)
What to call a Natural Philosopher
• Philosophe? No, too French.
• William Whewell posed the question and provided an answer anonymously in the Quarterly Review
(1834):
‘separation and dismemberment . . . . The mathematician turns away from the chemist ; the chemist
from the naturalist ; the mathematician, left to himself, divides himself into a pure mathematician and a
mixed mathematician, who soon part company; the chemist is perhaps a chemist of electro-chemistry;
if so, he leaves common chemical analysis to others; between the mathematician and the chemist is to
be interpolated a 'physicien' (we have no English name for him), who studies heat, moisture, and the
like. And thus science, even mere physical science, loses all traces of unity. A curious illustration of this
result may be observed in the want of any name by which we can designate the students of the
knowledge of the material world collectively. We are informed that this difficulty was felt very
oppressively by the members of the British Association for the Advancement of Science, at their
meetings at York, Oxford, and Cambridge, in the last three summers. There was no general term by
which these gentlemen could describe themselves with reference to their pursuits. Philosophers was
felt to be too wide and too lofty a term, and was very properly forbidden them by Mr. Coleridge, both in
his capacity of philologer and metaphysician ; savans was rather assuming, besides being French instead
of English ; some ingenious gentleman [Whewell himself] proposed that, by analogy with artist, they
might form scientist, and added that there could be no scruple in making free with this termination
when we have such words as sciolist, economist, and atheist--but this was not generally palatable ;
others attempted to translate the term by which the members of similar associations in Germany have
described themselves, but it was not found easy to discover an English equivalent for natur-forscher.
The process of examination which it implies might suggest such undignified compounds as nature-poker,
or nature-peeper, for these naturae curiosi ; but these were indignantly rejected.’
The Philosophical Breakfast Club
Meeting of 4 friends in Cambridge University in 1812-13
to discuss new methodologies for the progress of
science:
Charles Babbage,
John Herschel,
Richard Jones and
William Whewell
Memento mori, mimic classical painting, postures show the agony of the human
condition, emotional and artistic idiom in which the scientific illustrations are
executed. Beauty and aesthetics important. Science is also and always art. (compare
'rightness' in Kuhn's conclusion and the theory of beauty in mathematics.
The Structure of Scientific Revolutions
• Thomas Kuhn (1922 – 1996) was an
American historian and philosopher of
science who began his career in
theoretical physics before switching
career paths.
• The Structure of Scientific Revolutions,
was first published in 1962
• One of the most cited academic books of
all time
• Challenged the prevailing view of
progress in “normal science,” which was
that science has been a continuous
increase in a set of accepted facts and
theories.
• Instead posited that the history of
science has been episodic, with periods
of continuity interrupted by
revolutionary science during which a
new “paradigm” changes the rules and
direction of scientific research.
• Questions the ‘objectivity’ of science.
Kuhn 2
• A scientific community cannot practice its trade without
some set of received beliefs. These beliefs form the
foundation of the "educational initiation that prepares and
licenses the student for professional practice". The nature
of the "rigorous and rigid" preparation helps ensure that
the received beliefs are firmly fixed in the student's mind.
Scientists take great pains to defend the assumption that
scientists know what the world is like...To this end, "normal
science" will often suppress novelties which undermine its
foundations. Research is therefore not about discovering
the unknown, but rather "a strenuous and devoted attempt
to force nature into the conceptual boxes supplied by
professional education".
Kuhn 3
• So how are paradigms created and what do
they contribute to scientific inquiry?
• Normal science "means research firmly based
upon one or more past scientific
achievements, achievements that some
particular scientific community acknowledges
for a time as supplying the foundation for its
further practice". These foundational
principles are paradigms
Kuhn 4
• Doing research is essentially like solving a puzzle.
Puzzles have rules. Puzzles generally have
predetermined solutions.
• A striking feature of doing research is that the
aim is to discover what is known in advance. This
in spite of the fact that the range of anticipated
results is small compared to the possible results.
When the outcome of a research project does not
fall into this anticipated result range, it is
generally considered a failure.
Kuhn 5
• Paradigm changes can result from discovery
brought about by encounters with anomaly.
• The more precise and far-reaching the
paradigm, the more sensitive it is to detecting
an anomaly and inducing change. By resisting
change, a paradigm guarantees that
anomalies that lead to paradigm change will
penetrate existing knowledge to the core.
Kuhn 6
• A scientific revolution is a non-cumulative developmental
episode in which an older paradigm is replaced in whole or
in part by an incompatible new one .
• A scientific revolution that results in paradigm change is
analogous to a political revolution.
• Political revolutions begin with a growing sense by
members of the community that existing institutions have
ceased adequately to meet the problems posed by an
environment that they have in part created.
• "the normal-scientific tradition that emerges from a
scientific revolution is not only incompatible but often
actually incommensurable with that which has gone
before".
Kuhn 7
• During scientific revolutions, scientists see new and
different things when looking with familiar instruments
in places they have looked before. Familiar objects are
seen in a different light and joined by unfamiliar ones
as well.
• Because paradigm shifts are generally viewed not as
revolutions but as additions to scientific knowledge,
and because the history of the field is represented in
the new textbooks that accompany a new paradigm, a
scientific revolution seems invisible.
• If the supporters of the new paradigm are competent,
they will improve the paradigm, explore its
possibilities, and show what it would be like to belong
to the community guided by it.
Kuhn 8
• Read the Conclusion of the book.
• He seems to be talking about debunking the
myth of ‘objectivity’ in science.
• He ends by reinforcing the highly individual
and eccentric figure of the scientist as genius.
Micrographia (1664)
• Non possis oculo quantum contendere Linceus,/Non
tamen idcirco contemnas Lippus inungi. ('Your eyes will
never see like Lynceus'; still/You rub them with an
ointment when they're ill.' trans. John Conington MA
(1869))
• Lynceus was a companion of Jason on the Argos,
reputed to have the ability to see through solid objects.
His name is derived from the Greek word for 'sight', as
is the name of the Lynx.
• Eyesight is the most privileged tool of early-modern
science and is celebrated and referred to repeatedly
during this period, from the choice of the name of the
Roman Accademia dei Lincei in 1603, to Hooke's
dictum: "with a sincere hand and a faithful eye".
Micrographia
Micrographia: The Baconian Frame
• In the Novum Organum (the new
instrumentality for the acquisition of
knowledge) Francis Bacon classified the
intellectual fallacies of his time under four
headings which he called idols.
• An idol is an image, in this case held in the
mind, which receives veneration but is
without substance in itself. Bacon did not
regard idols as symbols, but rather as
fixations. In this respect he anticipated
modern psychology.
Micrographia: The Baconian Frame
• Idols of the Tribe are deceptive beliefs inherent in the
mind of man, and therefore belonging to the whole of
the human race. They are abstractions in error arising
from common tendencies to exaggeration, distortion,
and disproportion. Thus men gazing at the stars
perceive the order of the world, but are not content
merely to contemplate or record that which is seen.
They extend their opinions, investing the starry
heavens with innumerable imaginary qualities. In a
short time these imaginings gain dignity and are
mingled with the facts until the compounds become
inseparable. This may explain Bacon's epitaph which is
said to be a summary of his whole method. It reads,
"Let all compounds be dissolved."
Micrographia: The Baconian Frame
• Idols of the Cave are those which arise within the mind of the
individual. This mind is symbolically a cavern. The thoughts of
the individual roam about in this dark cave and are variously
modified by temperament, education, habit, environment,
and accident. Thus an individual who dedicates his mind to
some particular branch of learning becomes possessed by his
own peculiar interest, and interprets all other learning
according to the colors of his own devotion. The chemist sees
chemistry in all things, and the courtier ever present at the
rituals of the court unduly emphasizes the significance of
kings and princes. (GESTALT SWITCH required?)
• (The title page of Bacon's New Atlantis (London 1626) is
ornamented with a curious design or printer's device. The
winged figure of Father Time is shown lifting a female figure
from a dark cave. This represents truth resurrected from the
cavern of the intellect.) GENDER AGAIN.
Micrographia: The Baconian Frame
• Idols of the Marketplace are errors arising from the
false significance bestowed upon words, and in this
classification Bacon anticipated the modern science of
semantics. According to him it is the popular belief
that men form their thoughts into words in order to
communicate their opinions to others, but often
words arise as substitutes for thoughts and men think
they have won an argument because they have out
talked their opponents. The constant impact of words
variously used without attention to their true meaning
only in turn condition the understanding and breed
fallacies. Words often betray their own purpose,
obscuring the very thoughts they are designed to
express.
Micrographia: The Baconian Frame
• Idols of the Theater are those which are due to
sophistry and false learning. These idols are built up
in the field of theology, philosophy, and science,
and because they are defended by learned groups
are accepted without question by the masses.
When false philosophies have been cultivated and
have attained a wide sphere of dominion in the
world of the intellect they are no longer
questioned. False superstructures are raised on
false foundations, and in the end systems barren of
merit parade their grandeur on the stage of the
world.
Micrographia
• For Bacon, therefore, understanding included memory
(history), imagination (poetry), and reason (philosophy)
• Like Bacon, Hooke does not believe that reliance upon
the senses is sufficient for natural philosophy. Instead,
the senses need to interact in an appropriate fashion
with memory and reason.
• The microscope is the first step in the coordinated
augmentation of these three fundamental faculties, so
that, “by a continual passage round from one Faculty to
another,” the health of philosophy may be improved.
• In this coordinated circulation, it is reason that plays
the crucial role, yet it is a reason disciplined by the
continual movement between augmented senses,
memory, and reason.
Micrographia
• An ambiguous attitude toward human nature
(men like beasts, see preface, 1st para) is related
to the relative values of the natural and the
artificial. Human corruption comes from
abandoning “the Prescripts and Rules of Nature,”
yet this error is rectified not by returning to such
natural rules but by employing “artificial
Instruments and methods.”
• The two tensions are linked insofar as humans
stand alone in having natures that call for the use
of artifice.
Micrographia
• the Royal Society should move beyond Bacon’s
initial call for wide fact collection to the next
stage of his method: the examination of
prerogative instances, observations selected
to aid the inductive process.
• Since memory could suffer from the
accumulation of irrelevancies, care had to be
taken by reason in selecting appropriate and
relevant facts from the senses.
Micrographia
• reason properly integrated with augmented
senses and memory outperforms reason
employed in ungrounded speculation, the
“work of the Brain and the Fancy.”
• discovering the cause of a phenomenon from
its microscopic appearance: e.g. cork
(springiness and lightness caused by porous
structure)
Micrographia
• Machine as metaphor
• greater perfection may be achievable by
noticing how nature outdoes art and seeking
to improve art in turn.
• improve the artificial to better approximate
the natural by using the microscope as part of
the design process
Micrographia
• the specific rhetoric of Micrographia may be
understood in the context of the identifiable
social and political concerns of the early Royal
Society.
• The early Royal Society simultaneously pursued
two activities, one scientific and the other
rhetorical: 'doing' the New Philosophy and
'writing' about it." In this context, printing was "a
way to establish, enhance, and protect its public
image.“
• Compare this with Hooke’s address to the Royal
Society re: methodology
Hermeneutic Toolbox
• Five parts of the classical art of rhetoric:
• Inventio,
• Dispositio,
• Elocutio,
• Memoria,
• Actio.
• Invention, Arrangement, Style, Memory,
Delivery
Intended to shape a new scientific genre