FACTORS OF FLOODING UPPER MIDDLE LOWER

Ill-aligned drains, poor/uncoordinated storm drains 630 86 112

(A)

High intensity rainstorms, prolong rain events 440 93 107

(B)

Poor waste management 295 64 79

(C)

Relief/Topography 178 32 99
(D)

Concrete road median, paved surface, low or zero soil 91 5 7

infiltration
(E)

Poor flood risk assessment, monitory and management 141 19 34

(F)

Unplanned urbanization, dense roofed development/increased in 199 27 53

paved surfaces
(G)
METHODOLOGY
This required that three different types of questionnaires were administered, namely; household questionnaire, community group template (used
during the FGDs), and biophysical assessment template. Feedbacks were obtained from the enumerators on their field experiences were used to
improve the data collection process until the completion of the field exercise. A minimum of two follow-up outings was arranged at the
household and community levels to ensure no important data were left out. Although a biophysical study template was used, most biophysical
data were obtained from primary data gathering techniques, instrument-aided assessments and measurements, modeling and incorporation of
proof-checked existing reports. Multiple sampling techniques were used to confirm or clear gray areas in the biophysical assessments.

Measures were taken through retooling and review to develop statistically-useful sampling frames for the surveys both at community and
household levels in order to achieve the objectives outlined in Components 1–4 (Section 1.3). The field survey plan ensured the hiring and
training of interviewers to carry out the survey in the project areas with a clear understanding of watershed configurations. A choice was made
on the use of the SPSS statistical package because of its wide data management scope.

EFFECT OF UPPER MIDDLE LOWER

FLOODING

Inundation of 289 16 15
farmlands
(H)

Prolonged travel time 251 6 5

(I)

Destruction of road 126 12 12

and public facilities
 (J)

Settlement relocation 216 41 116

(K)

Outbreak of water 214 39 90

borne diseases
(L)

Pollution of water 105 18 41

sources
(M)

Loss of household 143 32 72

properties
(N)

Loss of income(O) 295 96 92

Pair wise Correlation matrix of factor of flooding and effect of flooding in IBB flood catchment area

A B C D E F G H I J K L M N O
A 1.000
B 1.000 1.000
C 1.000 1.000 1.000
D .907 .905 .914 1.000
E 1.000 1.000 .999 .898 1.000
F .998 .997 .998 .935 .996 1.000
 G .995 .994 .997 .944 .993 1.000 1.000
H .999 .999 .998 .887 1.000 .993 .990 1.000
1 .999 .999 .998 .887 1.000 .993 .990 1.000 1.000
J .999 .999 .998 .889 1.000 .994 .990 1.000 1.000 1.000
K .921 .919 .927 .999 .913 .947 .955 .903 .903 .904 1.000
L .970 .969 .974 .982 .965 .985 .989 .958 .958 .959 .988 1.000
M .977 .975 .980 .976 .972 .990 .993 .966 .966 .967 .983 1.000 1.000
N .949 .947 .954 .994 .942 .969 .975 .933 .933 .935 .997 .997 .994 1.000
O .998 .999 .997 .881 .999 .992 .988 1.000 1.000 1.000 .897 .954 .962 .928 1.000

Rotated Component Matrixa

VARIABLES FACTORS
1 2
Ill-aligned drains,
poor/uncoordinated storm .817 .576
drains
High intensity rainstorms,
.821 .571
prolong rain events
Poor waste management .808 .589
Relief /Topography .499 .867
Concrete road median,
paved surface, low or zero .830 .558
soil infiltration
Poor flood risk assessment,
.774 .633
monitory and management
Unplanned urbanization,
dense roofed
.757 .654
development/increased in
paved surfaces
inundation of farmlands .843 .539
prolonged travel time .843 .538
destruction of public
.841 .541
facilities
settlement relocation .529 .849
outbreak of water borne
.653 .757
diseases
pollution of water sources .675 .738
destruction of household
.593 .805
properties
loss of income .850 .527
Total variance explained

Factor Eigen value Percentage of Cumulative

variance explained %age explained

1 14.592 97.280 97.280

11 0.408 2.720 100

Total 15.0 100 100