Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student’s Name
Institutional Affiliation
ASSESSMENT 2 2
Introduction
The following report provides an analysis of financial, capital structure, and dividend
decisions made during a six-week simulated stock market trading. In the six-week period, stocks
for five companies were bought. The goal was to make financial and purchase decisions that
would maximize profitability and shareholder return. At the beginning, the overall theme of the
trading was to identify long-term stocks that could provide guaranteed returns in the far future
and short-term stocks that could provide high returns in the present despite carrying significant
risks. While efforts were made to stick to the theme, the purchase decisions made largely failed
to yield the desired returns. Consequently, the this report seeks to analyze the trading activities
made during the period with the goal of explaining the decisions made and recommend future
decisions that would enable the company achieve high profitability and shareholder returns. The
analysis will take into account the operating environment of Iwi/Maori organizations and the
impact of corporate financial performance on the activities of such organizations. To begin with,
an overview of the trade carried out in the six-week period will be given. Secondly, there will be
three separate sections discussing financial, capital structure, and dividend decisions that can be
made to improve the company’s fortunes. The report will conclude with a highlight of major
lessons learned during the trading and how the said lessons will influence future business
decisions.
Trading started in the month of January and continued until early March. As earlier
pointed out, a theme had been selected for the trading to inform decisions that would be made
during the six-week period. The theme was influenced by the need to achieve high levels of
ASSESSMENT 2 3
profitability and increasing shareholder returns while bearing in mind that there was only a very
short period (six weeks) to achieve the said goal. The chosen theme targeted to meet two
objectives. Firstly, there was the need to trade in stocks that would provide long-term stability
and returns. Stocks of the said nature usually have lower risks. However, while the returns are
guaranteed for a considerable time in the future, there are minimal when weighed in the short-
term (Hill, Jones, & Schilling, 2014). In this regard, the goal was to purchase more of the long-
term stocks so that both the short-term and long-term gains can be high.
The second approach was to purchase stocks that would deliver high returns in the short-
term despite carrying significant risks. Companies that are trying to establish a footing in the
industry may usually have stocks with volatile prices (Hill, Jones, & Schilling, 2014). As the
companies try to achieve stability, their stocks also grow in price considerably. The purchase of
the said stocks guarantees high returns in the short-term (Windsor & Boatright, 2010). However,
due to the volatility, they also expose one to significant risks. Therefore, care is usually taken
when selecting such stocks to ensure that exposure to risks is minimal during the expected period
of returns. Another advantage of stocks that yield high short-term returns is that they cost
significantly less than stocks from other established companies (Windsor & Boatright, 2010).
Therefore, one can make a small investment and stand to benefit greatly in the future.
The identified theme was used as guide for trading during the six-week period. Care was
taken to balance between buying short-term and long-term stocks so that the desired returns
could be achieved. At the end of the period, the major stocks bought were that of Amazon Inc.,
Facebook Inc., Signature Bank, and Churchill Downs Inc. The stocks of Signature Bank, and
Churchill Downs Inc. were chosen for the short-term gains. On the other hand, the stocks for
Amazon Inc., and Facebook Inc. were chosen for their long-term gains. In the former category,
ASSESSMENT 2 4
Signature Bank, and Churchill Downs Inc were viewed as companies with a high potential for
growth in the short-term. The financial reports for the two companies showed that they had
achieved significant growth in the last three years and there was still the opportunity and
capacity for expansion. As a result, their stocks would yield high returns in the short-term as the
businesses exploit their existing growth potential and increase both their revenues and profits.
In the latter category, Amazon Inc., and Facebook Inc. were chosen for their long-term
gains. To begin with, the two are established companies that occupy a niche that is hard to fill. As
a result, they will remain to be present even in the future as the services they provide remain
valuable. Secondly, the said companies have a huge market capitalization and are considered
among the largest companies in the world. Due to their size, they are well equipped to weather
any difficult economic times and remain profitable in the future (Singh & Pattanayak, 2014).
Additionally, both companies have worked towards diversifying their operations, thereby,
reducing the risks of having only one income channel. Therefore, they are bound to remain
At the end of the period all of the stocks except that of Amazon Inc. had failed to yield
the desired returns. The stock for Churchill Downs Inc. experienced a fall and ended at a price
that was 224% less than the buying price. The stock of Facebook Inc. remained largely stagnant
with a growth of only 0.5%. The stock of Signature Bank also experienced a similar fate with a
growth of 0.32%. Amazon Inc. stock yielded considerable returns with a growth of 1.95%.
Failure to achieve high performance was attributed to market slowdown and decisions that
maximize on the utility of the best stocks during the short period of trading. In this regard, a
detailed analysis of the trading activities will follow together with the best decisions that could
Financing Decisions
In the six-week period, financial decisions were made based on the role of financing to
strategic decision making. As pointed out by Abor (2005), companies now rely on financial
decisions to support their strategy. Since cooperation’s strategies rely on where they are and
where they want to be, sound financial decisions act as a bridge to achieve the desired goals. In
this regard, the role of financing to strategic decision making was given a key focus during the
The first role of financing that was given key focus is the analysis of financial statements
financial position. Investors rely on such information to determine future profitability of the
company and whether shareholders would receive the desired returns (Alkaraan & Northcott,
2006). Additionally, they interpret such information to determine whether a company is able to
meet both its short-term and long-term obligations. Two key metrics were used during the six-
week trading period to determine the financial viability of chosen companies. Firstly, revenues
and profits were analyzed to determine how well the company has been performing in the recent
period. High revenues and profits indicate stability and high returns in the future. Secondly, debt
and liquidity rations were analyzed to determine how well a company could meet its short-term
High liquidity ratios indicate a good flow of cash. It is an indicator that a company has
managed its assets well and is in a good position to honor its short-term obligations (Saleem &
Rehman, 2011). Companies with high liquidity ratios can be expected to remain operational and
profitable in the foreseeable future. Therefore, it is prudent to purchase stocks from the said
companies. Debt ratios show whether a company has borrowed more than it would be able to pay
ASSESSMENT 2 6
in the future. Companies with high debt are usually unattractive to investors and lenders in the
long-term (Delen, Kuzey, & Uyar, 2013). They run the risk of failing to raise enough capital
when such is needed to expand operations and make more revenues. Additionally, the said
companies may have poor activities in the stock market since few investors will be interested in
their stock. Consequently, care was made to buy stocks from companies with a good debt ratio.
The companies would be able to honor their long-term obligations and remain operational.
Two stocks were purchased based on the liquidity and debt ratios of their companies. The
two stocks are Amazon Inc., Facebook Inc. The two companies had high liquidity ratios, thereby,
indicating that they had the means to meet short-term obligations. Additionally, high liquidity
ratios also enable a company to respond swiftly to market changes, such as the existence of new
opportunities, thereby, increasing the chances of having positive returns in the future. Amazon
Inc., Facebook Inc. stock were purchased with the goal of ensuring both long-term and short-
The second role of financing that was considered during the six-week trading period was
cost reduction. A company can achieve more success by delivering more with less. Financing can
be used to institute cost-control measures that will ensure that high operational efficiencies are
achieved (Uremadu & Efobi, 2012). The end result is that there will be more positive returns
despite minimal investments being made during the period. There are a number of ways that
companies can achieve cost-reduction through financing. They include investing in technologies
that improve efficiency by automating some activities and buying items in bulk so as to negotiate
for better prices. However, the strategy used during the six-week period was to purchase
affordable stock that had the potential for high returns so that the portfolio can earn high returns
Two stocks were purchased in line with the goal of reducing costs and achieving high
returns. They are the stocks of Signature Bank, and Churchill Downs Inc. The said stocks are
from companies that have vast potential for growth by virtue that they are still trying to establish
a niche in the market. While their prices have the risk of being volatile, they can also yield high
returns when the companies grow and increase their revenues and profits significantly.
The financial decisions made during the six-week trading period took into account the
operating environment of Iwi/Maori organizations and how business decisions can have an
unconventional impact on the said organizations. Iwi/Maori organizations are guided by a culture
that considers long-term sustainable returns to be of more value (Warriner, 2007). While the
organizations strive to be financially viable as any other business, wealth creation is deemed
important if it can be sustained for the future (Warriner, 2007). In this regard, the decision to
focus on stocks that could yield significant returns both in the short-term and in the long-term
were made in light of the Iwi/Maori organizations’ culture. The business would remain
financially viable for the foreseeable future by having high-risk stocks yielding high returns in
the short-term and low-risk stocks yielding low returns in the long-term.
Despite the financial decisions made during the period, the desired financial returns were
not achieved. The failure can be attributed to a slowdown in the market which led to poor growth
in most of the stocks that were purchased. In this regard, there are a number of financial
decisions that can be made in the future to avoid such an occurrence. To begin with, more
metrics should be used to analyze the financial position of companies before making the decision
to buy their stock. One key ratio that can be used is profitability ratios. The ratios provide a
picture of how efficiently a company is earning its income relative to its size and revenues. High
profitability ratios can be achieved even in companies with a lower market capitalization
ASSESSMENT 2 8
provided they are efficient enough in their practices. While Facebook reported significant profits
in its recent financial report, its profitability ratio pointed to a case of inefficiency. As a result,
low returns were achieved despite the fact that the company occupies a unique niche with the
Another key financial metric that should be considered is price to earnings ratio. The ratio
values the company based on how its per-share earnings compare to share price. A stock with a
historically-high price to earnings ratio indicates a company that has performed well consistently
and can deliver high returns in the short-term and in the long-term. The metric is especially
useful when comparing stocks from different companies especially when they differ greatly in
terms of market capitalization. Big companies may choose to plough back their earnings into the
business and pay a small amount to the investors. As a result, their price to earnings ratio will be
significantly lower. Therefore, it is prudent to invest in companies that show high price to
A capital structure determines where a company source the money it uses to finance its
operations. A sound capital structure provides a stable foundation for business growth since it
ensures that there will always be money to finance the operations of an entity (Uremadu, 2012).
At present, companies rely on two major capital structures to raise funds that will finance their
operations. The two methods are debt and equity. A company can choose to borrow money an
acquire debt to finance its operations. It can also choose to sell stock to investors and gain equity.
The implementation of both strategies goes a long way to ensuring that a company will meet its
goals.
ASSESSMENT 2 9
In the six-week period, capital structure decisions were made to facilitate trading and
increase the chances of achieving the desired objectives. For instance, there was a focus on
avoiding companies that were largely financed by debt since they face the risk of lacking
sufficient capital in the future to finance operations if they had not paid a significant portion of
their debt. However, based on the unimpressive trading outcomes for the six-week period, it is
clear that better capital structure decisions are to be made in the future in order to achieve better
results.
The first critical capital structure decision that should be made is to consider the benefits
and drawbacks of each financing methods before selecting to purchase stock from a company
based on the criteria (Covas & Den Haan, 2011). Equity and debt financing come with their fare
share of costs. In the case of equity financing, investors will expect dividends at the end of the
period for the money they have chosen to invest in the company. Dividends are a cost that come
with selling company shares to raise more funds to finance operations. A high rate of return to
investor indicates that there is a higher cost to financing the operations of a given company.
Therefore net profits will be significantly reduced. In the case of debt financing, companies have
to pay interest for money borrowed. The amount of interest that a given loan attracts is the cost
of acquiring such a loan. Historically, the cost incurred in taking loans has been significantly
lower than that incurred in issuing out dividends (Covas & Den Haan, 2011). However, interest
payments impact net profits significantly since they are an expense that should be deducted from
the income. Taking into account the merits and demerits of each capital structure will ensure that
better decisions are made when choosing which stock to buy or sell.
The second critical capital structure decision that should be considered in the future is the
fact that profitability is shared based on the capital structure of a business. An entity that relies
ASSESSMENT 2 10
heavily on debt ends up with more interest payments to meet at the end of a given period.
However, the said entity has fewer business owners to pay since it has relied on debt rather than
equity. Consequently, such companies may yield high returns when their stock is purchased
(Covas & Den Haan, 2011). Additionally, relying on debt for financing leaves a business with
extra funds in the short-term which can be used to expand operations by increasing capacity or
targeting new markets. Therefore, more returns can be achieved and help meet the intended
objectives.
The proposed capital structure decisions take into account the operating environment of
Iwi/Maori organizations and how such businesses can access capital despite being significantly
different from other organizations. To begin with, many Iwi/Maori organizations focus on a
diverse bottom line that goes beyond financial performance (Harmsworth, 2005). They also aim
for social, cultural, spiritual, and environmental goals. In this regard, balancing between debt and
equity as a way of accessing capital can help the organizations gain sufficient financing to pursue
goals beyond financial performance. Secondly, some Iwi/Maori organizations are set up to
further the interests of a select group of people or community who normally share certain
resources, such as land (Harmsworth, 2005). In such organization, the benefits of issuing equity
to raise finances can be exploited. The businesses will be able to maintain their goal of having a
community-owned enterprise while raising sufficient capital at the same time to pursue their
Dividend Decisions
dividends from net profits they have earned during a given period. Dividend decisions usually
aim to meet two objectives. Firstly, dividend payments attract more investors to a company (Gill,
ASSESSMENT 2 11
Biger, & Tibrewala, 2010). High payments indicate a high return on investment. A company
stock will then fetch high prices, thereby, increasing its value. Investors are usually attracted to
companies with high return on investments since they know their money will yield substantial
Secondly, dividend payment decisions are made based on a company’s need to reinvest
some of the money it has earned back to the business. Companies need to grow sustainably in
order to remain relevant in the future. Lack of growth will impede prospects of earning revenues
and profits in the future. One strategy that is used to sustain growth is to plough back some of the
earned profits into the business. For instance, some of the profits can be channeled into research
and development activities so that there can be more products and services to sell in the future.
The balance between giving investors good dividends and saving some of the returns for future
business investments underlies a good dividends strategy. Companies with the capability to
perform well both in the short-term and in the long-term balance between earning shareholders
significant returns and plowing back profits into the business to support future activities.
There are two key. The major dividend decision that can help in choosing a company
with the best stock to invest is to choose companies that employ a performance-based dividend
payout strategy. Companies that utilize the said strategy pay investors based on the performance
for a given period. The strategy yields two important outcomes. Firstly, it ensures that investors
earn a fair share of the returns since they have helped the business to raise funds that it has used
to support its operations (Skinner, 2008). When investors are paid well, the stock of a company
becomes attractive and increases in value. As a result, the company continues to increase in value
and stands a better chance of raising funds in the future to support operations. Secondly, a
performance-based payout guarantees that there will be funds left to re-invest in the business
ASSESSMENT 2 12
(Skinner, 2008). Therefore, a company will maintain its ability to grow and achieve more
Conclusion
The six-week trading period was a great learning experience on how companies make
financial, capital structure, and dividend decisions to maximize profitability and shareholder
returns. Two key lessons were learned during the period. To begin, it was found out that the stock
market was a volatile environment that required constant shifting of strategies to achieve the
desired outcomes. For instance, a stock bought today may require to be sold tomorrow to achieve
high returns. Therefore, an investors needs to remain open to new decisions and flexible enough
to address any market shifts. Secondly, a critical evaluation of a company’s various performance
metrics are required to purchase the right stock. Failure to perform a critical analysis will lead to
stocks that stagnate or fail. In this regard, future trading endeavors will take into account the said
References
Abor, J. (2005). The effect of capital structure on profitability: an empirical analysis of listed
Alkaraan, F., & Northcott, D. (2006). Strategic capital investment decision-making: A role for
Covas, F., & Den Haan, W. J. (2011). The cyclical behavior of debt and equity finance. American
Delen, D., Kuzey, C., & Uyar, A. (2013). Measuring firm performance using financial ratios: A
Gill, A., Biger, N., & Tibrewala, R. (2010). Determinants of dividend payout ratios: evidence
Hill, C. W., Jones, G. R., & Schilling, M. A. (2014). Strategic management: Theory & cases: An
Singh, P. K., & Pattanayak, J. K. (2014). Linking of customer satisfaction with shareholders’
Skinner, D. J. (2008). The evolving relation between earnings, dividends, and stock
Uremadu, S. O. (2012). Bank capital structure, liquidity and profitability evidence from the
Uremadu, S. O., & Efobi, R. U. (2012). The impact of capital structure and liquidity on corporate
Warriner, V. (2007). The importance of traditional Maori values for necessity and opportunity:
Windsor, D., & Boatright, J. R. (2010). Shareholder wealth maximization. Finance ethics: