Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Student:
Date of birth:
Place of birth:
Permanent address:
Date:
Student: Mentor:
Program director:
“INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ON THE COMPANY'S
PERFORMANCE“ Commented [N.V.3]: The synopsis requires proofreading
(grammar revision – use British English).
Thay also said that “A firm’s survival and success depends on the ability of its managers to Commented [HN11]: Grammar.
create sufficient wealth and satisfaction for its primary stakeholders. Primary stakeholders Commented [HN12]: Do not use past tense when reviewing
the literature. Please use present tense instead.
of a firm include employees, shareholders, customers, suppliers, communities, and natural
environment. If any of the primary stake- holder groups withdraws its support to the firm, Formatted: Highlight
the firm’s operation is adversely affected. When stakeholders loose confidence in a firm’s Formatted: Highlight
performance, the firm loses its critical support structure and customer base. Customers stop
buying products or go for legal suits, share- holders sell their stocks, employees do not
perform, and environmental advocates sue, all of which directly affect firm performance.”
(Molina-Azorin, Tari, Claver-Cortes and Lopez-Gamero, 2009) said that “ Environmental Commented [N.V.13]: Wrong citation
management may affect firm performance positively. This positive effect may result from
the positive impact on firm cost and differentiation levels. Pollution prevention can allow
savings in input and energy consumption and increase the demand of environmentally
sensitive consumers.”
Environment Management System (EMS) is a tool for managing the impacts of an Commented [N.V.14]: Use small letters (except the first
one).
organisation's activities on the environment. It provides a structured approach to planning
Commented [HN15]: Reference is needed when you write
and implementing environment protection measures. definition – refer to the theoretical literature.
(Sarkis & Sroufe, 2004) said that “A general assumption is that most firms have some
version of an EMS in place with systems ranging from informal policies and practices to
formalised third-party certified systems that are widely publicised by the firm and integral
to their strategic direction. No matter what level and type of system a firm chooses,
practitioners and researchers alike wish to examine and better understand the extent to
which these systems are cross-functional, their impact on performance eval- uation, their
capability to monitor supply chains and the life-cycles of products and services and, most
central, whether these systems do contribute to better environmental performance.”
Another autors (Repetto Robert and Austin Duncan, 2000) explain that “investors and
companies have become increasingly aware of the many ways that environmental issues
affect their businesses, presenting both challenges and opportunities. Environmental issues
generate business risks that have to be carefully managed. Regulations aimed at protecting
human health and the environment constantly evolve and often create uncertainties for
firms with significant implications for their financial performance. Consumer reactions,
toxic torts, and other environmentally motivated litigation create serious non-regulatory
risks that may reduce a company’s markets or undermine its balance sheet. At the same
time, rich rewards are increasingly available to companies able to transform environmental
concern into market opportunity or competitive advantage. Some companies have
recognized new demands for “green” products and established new market niches. Some
companies find their reputations are enhanced and their earnings increased by adopting
cleaner production techniques or facilities. Companies have even made a changing
regulatory framework into a source of competitive advantage by pre-empting
environmental regulations and voluntarily going beyond compliance on their own terms,
knowing that rivals will likely be compelled to react later. In many different ways, the
environment is directly affecting the bottom line, often with very different consequences
for companies even within the same sector.”
By (Burnett, Hansen & Quintana) “Efficiency improvements are an important part of Commented [N.V.16]: There are 6 references in the
description of the problem. 10 references are required.
environmental management because they help eliminate nonvalue added activities and
increase the likelihood that the same or more good (intended) output is produced using
fewer inputs while simultaneously reducing bad (pollution) output.” Commented [HN17]: In the description of the problem you
have to mention what you are going to investigate with respect
to the EMS. You have just reviewed the literature, which is not
enough.
3. Research objectives
Making the final paper will be based on the available literature, published scientific
articles and other resource related to the environmental management. Research
methods include collection of primary and secondary data. Primary date will be Commented [N.V.28]: Grammar: data
collected by the survay. Secondary data will be collected by secondary sources like Commented [N.V.29]: Grammar: survey
report from enterprises by downloading important data from previously published
scientific research papers and downloading data from various publications about the
companies, environmental management, corporate social responsibility.
Literature review will be made to access information and gather knowledge and
distribution on the subject by a search from the different website, internet search for
e-books, official journals and publication from academic institution in their respective
sites.
A questionnaire for the study would be framed for assessing the environmental
management in a certain company. Data collected will be reviewed and summarized. Commented [N.V.30]: Who will be the respondents? How
will you evaluate the effect fo the environmental management
Types of question would be based on the following pattern: on the performance of the company (financial data)?
1. Open-ended question, Commented [N.V.31]: Check the use of definite article (the)
2. Two-way question (having alternative response like ’yes’ or ’no’), and indefinite (a) in the whole thesis.
3. Multiple choice questions,
4. Ranking scale (respondent to rank a list of items).
To defend the thesis topic used general and specific scientific methods. From the Commented [N.V.32]: Grammar: To defend the thesis’ topic
general and specific methods will be used.
general scientific methods are used: analysis and synthesis, inductive and deductive
Commented [N.V.33]: Grammar: analysis and synthesis are
method, generalization, comparative method. From special scientific methods used used
method of modeling and survey methods.
Commented [N.V.34]: The explanation of which methods
will be used is inappropriate. You should explain for each
method in which part of your thesis will be used (according to
the structure). Just to name all methods is not enough.
Commented [N.V.35]: Grammar
5. Structure of the thesis Commented [N.V.36]: I would suggest to rethink the
structure of the thesis. Will chapters include some subchapters?
INTRODUCTION
1. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT
1.1. Environmental management models
1.2. The role of environmental management
1.3. Development of EM models
2. CONNECTION BETWEEN SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY AND COMPANY
PERFORMANCE
2.1. Corporate social responsibiliy
2.2. Environmental regulations
3. STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING
3.1. THE ROLE OF STRATEGIC ENVIRONMENTAL PLANNING Commented [N.V.38]: Only one subchapter is not allowed.
4. ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS
5. ORGANIZATIONS FOR ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION
6. INFLUENCE OF ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT ON COMPANY
PERFORMANCE IN “XX” COMPANY Commented [N.V.39]: Selected company instead of XX
company.
7. RECOMMENDATION
1. Ben Brik, A., Rettab, B. and Mellahi, K. Market Orientation, Corporate Social
Responsibility, and Business Performance. Journal of Business Ethics (2011) Commented [N.V.42]: Volume, issue missing
2. D. Burnett, R., R. Hansen, D. and Quintana, O. (n.d.) Eco-Efficiency: Achieving
Productivity Improvements through Environmental Cost Management. Accounting Commented [N.V.43]: Do not cite journal data bases.
and the Public Interest, Volume 7, 2007. Commented [N.V.44]: Correct citation:
3. D. Klassen, R. and P. McLaughlin, C. (1996). The Impact of Environmental Klassen, D., & McLaughlin, P. C. (1996). The Impact of
Environmental Management on Firm Performance. Management
Management on Firm Performance. Management Science; Aug 1996; 42, 8; Science;42 (8), 1199 – 1214.
ProQuest pg. 1199
4. D'Souza, C. (n.d.). ISO 14000 Standards: An environmental solution or a marketing Commented [N.V.45]: Do not cite journal data bases.
opportunity? Electronic Green Journal; Apr.2004, Issue 20 Commented [N.V.46]: Place of publication?
5. Darabaris, J. (2008). Corporate Environmental Management. Taylor & Francis Commented [N.V.47]: Correct citation: Darabaris, J.
Group, LLC (2007). Corporate Environmental Management. Boca Raton:
CRC Press.
(Comment: see
http://www.barnesandnoble.com/sample/read/9781420055467)
6. F. Molina-Azorin, J., Claver-Cortes, E., D. Lopez-Gamero, M. and J. Tari, J. Green
management and financial performance: a literature review. Management Decision
Vol. 47 No. 7, 2009 pp. 1080-1100 Emerald Group Publishing Limited
7. F. Molina-Azorín, J., J. Tarí, J., Claver- Cortés, E. and D. López-Gamero, M. (n.d).
Quality management, environmental management and firm performance: A review
of empirical studies and issues of integration. International Journal of Management
Reviews (2009)
8. Hanson, J., A. Melnyk, S. & J. Calantone, R. (2004). Greenleaf Publishing.
Michigan State University, USA Commented [N.V.48]: Title?
9. Hitchens, D., Thankappan, S., Trainor, M., Clausen, J. and De Marchi, B.
(2004). Environmental performance, competitiveness and managemenet of
small businesses in Europe. Blackwell Publishing Ltd., Oxford, UK.
10. I. Kassinis, G. and C. Soteriou, A. (2002). Greening the service profit chain: The
impact of environmental management practices. Production and operations
management. Vol. 12, No. 3, Fall 2003
11. J. Bourgeois, III J. Strategy and Environment: A Conceptual Integration. The
Academy of Management Review, Vol. 5, No. 1. (Jan., 1980), pp. 25-39
12. J. Foley, A., Gutierrez, S. and D. Hecht, A. (2005). Sustainability Research
Strategy. Office of Research and Development U.S. Environmental Protection
Agency Washington, D.C.
13. J. Stapleton, P. and A. Glover, M. (2001). Environmental Management Systems: An
Implementation Guide for Small and Medium-Sized Organizations. Glover-
Stapleton Associates, Inc., Grasonville
14. Kim, H., Lee, M., Lee, H. & Kim, N. (2010). Corporate Social Responsibility and
Employee–Company Identification. Journal of Business Ethics (2010)
15. Kolk, A. and Mauser, A. (2001). The evolution of Environmental Management:
From stage models to performance evaluation. Business Strategy and the
Environment, 11, (2002)
16. L. Hass, J. Environmental (Green) Management Typologies: An evaluation,
operationalization and empirical development. Business Strategy and the
Environment, Vol. 5, 59-68 (1996)
17. Lankoski, L. (2000). Determinants Of Environmental Profit; An analysis of the
firm-level relationship between environmental performance and economic
performance. Helsinki University of Technology Institute of Strategy and
International Business. Finland
18. M. Rugman, A. & Verbeke, A. (1998). Corporate Strategies and Environmental
Regulations: An Organizing Framework. Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 19,
No. 4, Special Issue: Editor's Choice. (1998), pp. 363-375.
19. Maier, S. & Vanstone, K. (2005). Do good environmental management systems
lead to good environmental performance?. Ethical Investment Research Services
(EIRIS) Ltd. London, England
20. Mishra, S. & Suar, D. (n.d.). Does Corporate Social Responsibility Influence Firm
Performance of Indian Companies?. Indian Institute of Technology Kharagpur,
Kharagpur, India
21. OECD (2001). OECD Environmental Strategy for the First Decade of the 21st
Century. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (sine loco)
22. Oktem, U., Lewis, P., Donovan, D., R. Hagan, J. and Pace, T. (2004). EMS and
Sustainable Development; A Model and Comparative Studies of Integration.
Greenleaf Publishing, 2005.
23. Oliviera Matias, J. and A. Coelho, D. (2002). The integration of the standards
systems of quality management, environmental management and occupational
health and safety management. Int. J. Prod. Res., 2002, vol. 40, no. 15
24. Paulikova, A. and Kopilcakova, L. (2009). Indoor Environmental Management.
Pollution Engineering, July 2009
25. Repetto, R. & Austin, D. (2000). Pure Profit: The Financial Implications Of
Environmental Performance. World Resources Institute.Washington, DC
26. Sarkis, J. and Sroufe, R. (2004). Strategic Sustainability: The State of the
Art In Corporate Environmental Management Systems. Greenleaf Publishing
(2005)
27. T. Lucas, M. and A. Wilson, M. (2008). Tracking the relationship between
environmental management and financial performance in the service industry.
Springer-Verlag 2008
28. Watson, K., Klingenberg, B., Polito, T. and G. Geurts, T. (n.d.). Impact of
Environmental Management System implementation on financial performance.
Management of Environmental Quality; 2004; 15, 6; ABI/INFORM Complete pg.
622
29. Wikipedia, (2011). Corporate social responsibility. Available at: Commented [N.V.49]: Avoid Wikipedia for definitions of
terms (like corporate social responsibility).
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility (Accesed at
20.04.2011)
See the Guidelines:
Feminism. (n.d.) In Encyclopædia Britannica online. Retrieved March 16, 2009, from
http://www.britannica.com
Corrected version:
Corporate social responsibility. (n.d.) In Wikipedia. Retrieved April 20, 2011, from
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Corporate_social_responsibility