Professional Documents
Culture Documents
McKenna Bailey
Professor Goeller
Sooner or later, home owners will need to hire a contractor to make necessary repairs to
their home. Whether it’s to fix a leaky tap, remodel the interior, install new windows, rewire, or
to put siding on an existing or brand new house, everyone will need to hire a contractor at some
point to complete a task that one cannot do by themselves. Unfortunately, consumers have to
take a chance finding a reliable and honest contractor who will perform the work. Also, many
Homeowners have had to report unprofessional conduct or just plain awful work done by
contractors when the job is said and done. For example, stolen funds, shoddy and or unfinished
work are a few of the more common complaints in reference to contractors. In order to better
understand the conduct of contractors, one must ask the questions of “How are they able to get
away with things like this so easily?”, “What regulations are affecting these contractors that they
Bailey 2
aren’t held responsible?”, and “Should regulations be changed so that contractors are held
first group of contractors starting the job at the beginning of this year. Our siding was damaged
in a wind storm, and our homeowner’s insurance company had sent us a check to fund the
replacement of all of our siding since it had been out of production for five years. The initial
contractors were hired to install new siding, patch holes in the fiberboard on several spots, and
create a wood trim around each of the window. The primary contractors had subcontracted out
another group of people to do this job and we were not told that they would be coming until the
last minute. Regardless, we let them continue the work despite the miscommunication. As time
progressed it was hard to communicate our desired specification because there was a language
barrier between us and the workers doing the job. Ultimately, these contractors did sub-par work
and believed that the quality of their work was not wrong, and have charged us as if the job had
been completely finished and up to building code. Examples of their poor work include cutting
off all window frames which voided a warranty we had with a previous contractor, poor
installation of Tyvek (a moisture barrier) with areas of potential leaks, and installing the siding
Bailey 3
so tight, it began to warp. We were also treated badly by the co-owner of this company who had
lied about his position until almost halfway through the job. When confronted about the quality
of work being provided to our home, he was very rude to us, condescending to us, or tried to
discourage us in our efforts to provide help or ask questions. Shortly thereafter, we employed the
help of the contractors that originally installed our windows to reinstate our warranty after it was
voided by damages done by the original contractors. The contractors that completed the work
incorrectly were hired because a representative of the window company falsely told us that their
company did not handle insurance claims despite having a check already cashed out and ready
from the insurance company. After getting the runaround on several occasions, false information
regarding pricing and specifics of the job, and ultimately, cancellation of our siding job, we
settled on repair of our windows and the employment of a third contractor to finish the job. The
image above is our home which has been left unsided and unfinished for several months. We
have heard similar horror stories from other homeowners about contractors like this, and have
encountered many while we have tried to improve our home. We have since reviewed our
contract from the first and second contractor and have found that there is a hush clause that
prevents clients from saying anything negative about their company or their employees. How
can this be fair to the consumers that have been shorthanded on receiving adequate services?
This is not fair whatsoever when taking the homeowner into consideration.
Aside from ourselves, there have been numerous other contractors who have gotten off so
easily without any form of legal recourse. An example of this would be Brandy Teague, a
homeowner from North Carolina, who claimed her husband’s childhood home was left
unfinished and the contractor walked out with 90% of the budget in their pocket (WMFY.com).
Brandy was told that she did not have many options to take the contractor to court. Even if they
Bailey 4
are taken to court, there are no guarantees that the homeowner will be paid the money the
company was sued for once the case is settled. Therefore, what would the point of suing
someone who did wrong and stole from you if you aren’t assured the money that was taken from
you? According to WMFY, contractors are rarely taken to court due to the lack of many
regulations guaranteeing anything for wronged home owners. WMFY also shows a report from
Ohio in 2016 stating that contractors were the top complaint among residents, and no changes are
being made to alleviate the inconveniences. According to an interviewed homeowner “By the
time you sue and spend money to go to court, you will spend more money than you lost,” the
terminated our contract and no one wanted to touch the job.” So not only are contractors taking
money from people, they are leaving the homeowners in terrible situations in which no one
wants to help them for the fear that they could be held accountable for damages the original
contractor caused. This is because the government does not enforce or check regulations as often
as they should. The previously mentioned contractor, in regards to Brandy Teague, was later
found to not have all the licenses he needed for part of the work he had done. By not having the
proper licensure to complete the required duties adequately, he should have refused the work or
admitted he could not complete it. The contractor is being reported for not having a license to do
a fraction of the work required, but cannot be charged with anything based off of the terrible
work that was done to this woman’s home. Going off of this resolution, the contractor would
have gotten away with not completing the job, and collecting 90% of the job had they received
the licensing for what was required. Even if the homeowner would be aware of their licensure,
another way contractors can get away easily would be due to their lack of experience.
Homeowners will not be familiarized on concepts such as structural integrity of windows or how
Bailey 5
siding should be put up properly, so they hire the expertise of contractors with the intentions of
them carrying out their job. Sadly, this expertise can lead some contractors to taking advantage
Some contractors have begun to scare homeowners with the threat of putting a mechanics
lien on their home to get the money they believe they deserve. We have received a threat like this
as well, they wanted $7,000 of the original $12,000 because they said they believed they had
done at least 60% of the work. The threat of a lien was given to us only a few days after we told
the contractors to cease their work on our home. The lien would prevent us from getting a loan to
complete the job with another contractor. The threat is intended to scare the home owner into
giving into the contractor and giving them the money they want. Even though they had not fully
filed the lien they would have had sixty days to do so since our home is a one family residential
dwelling they would have seventy-five days otherwise. Oil and gas liens are allotted one hundred
and twenty days, the subject of the lien effects the amount of time the contractors are allowed to
To make sure they are not getting away with anything that may be questionable,
contractors have regulations that need to be followed in order to perform their duties properly
and be paid properly for the jobs they are tasked for. According to OSHA, “To the extent that a
subcontractor of any tier agrees to perform any part of the contract, he also assumes
responsibility for complying with the standards in this part with respect to that part. Thus, the
prime contractor assumes the entire responsibility under the contract and the subcontractor
assumes responsibility with respect to his portion of the work. With respect to subcontracted
work, the prime contractor and any subcontractor or subcontractors shall be deemed to have joint
responsibility.” In other words once a contractor or subcontractor has signed a contract they are
Bailey 6
obligated to complete their part of the work, but many people are getting left with incomplete
work or poorly done work. Depending on what is done contractors should be paid by the hour for
the work they do, and this is not the case (The Balance.com). In fact many independent
contractors will ask for a large sum of the money upfront. This is not what they should be doing,
as the work progresses they would receive payment that follows the amount of work done.
Contractors have supplies as well as employees that have to pay for, but this is not an excuse for
shoddy work or terrible communication between them and a homeowner. In the state of Ohio
many things are required before you can become a contractor such as, having preformed work in
a relevant trade for a minimum of five years prior or have worked as a registered engineer for a
minimum of three year in the trade of the license of choice, Take and pass trade exams, as well
The regulations above are just a few of the list of requirements necessary in order to
receive licensing in particular trades. However, there are ways they can slip through the cracks.
Thus, regulations should be changed as measure to prevent contractors from slipping through the
cracks, and create contractors that have skin in the game in regards to their expertise. As stated
before, one of the legal requirements would be that contractors must carry a legal minimum of
$500,000 in liability insurance. Instead, the legal minimum should be raised because not only
would it provide coverage in the event of multiple accidents throughout the time period of the
insurance, it would also require the contractor to pay a higher premium which would provide a
tighter barrier to entry. The other change in regulations towards contractors deals with the testing
procedures of licensure for particular trades. When contractors take their exams for licensure,
there should be multiple types bundled together rather than just one license that they are going
for. This creates an additional barrier to entry that not only creates more transactional costs, but it
Bailey 7
requires contractors to get an overall general knowledge of houses and how to retain their
structural integrity. This way when a contractor is presented with a job that they are unsure of,
they can be better prepared to handle the work rather than lying to the homeowner about their
on the job, rudeness and condescension, or just simply walking off with your money without
barely touching the job altogether. However, if the work is not done to the homeowner’s
standards something that should be asked is: “Did the homeowner elaborate on what they wanted
the contractors to do? Did they have it all planned out or just tell them the bare minimum?”
(NYT) These would be useful in figuring out if the homeowner has a reasoning for how upset
they are or if they just don’t like the work and want their money back. With our initial contractor,
the co-owner responsible for the construction aspect of the job argued that we were setting high
expectations, and the level of quality and attention to detail on the job was top notch. After
employing our second contractor, we became aggravated with their lack of follow-through, their
deceitful statements, additional charges for work we were lead to believe was covered in the
initial estimate, and having to settle for products different from what were ordered we tried to
negotiate a price reduction. We reached out to the president of the company he was not receptive
to our request to lower the price of the job as he concluded we were looking to simply stretch our
dollar at his expense. His justification was that the estimates that his salesmen provided were
below what the whole job should have been quoted for and compared it to, “…him paying us to
complete the siding job…” because it would not have worked in his favor. If you’re looking to
steer clear of these situations, one of the best solutions for these issues is to do research about
these contractors before they are hired to work on your premises. Contact the Better Business
Bailey 8
Bureau, the Chamber of Commerce in the community where there business resides, check out
reviews on sites such as Angie’s List, or attempt to get personal references from former clients.
If you do not like their attitude towards you or around other workers, confront the contractor
about it in the moment and communicate the issues you are having with their attitude (Home
Advisor). However, many contractors do not care about the attitude of their subcontractors and
they just want their quality of work. Speaking directly to an employee for a subcontractor about
their attitude would more than likely make the issue more prominent.
In my personal opinion, contractors are a very vital resource to homeowners. They are
trained to complete projects that otherwise, many homeowners would be unable to handle for
themselves. This is crucial for everyone who needs to complete some type of remodel or simply
repair a basic issue in their home; such as plumbing, electric, or air. Because these people are
trained you would expect them to perform their job without hassle right? Well as stated before,
that is not always the case. Yes, there are good contractors who can complete the work without
issue as well as being very personable and friendly, not everyone is the same and at some point
we may get someone who is unpleasant who only complete sub-par work for their own benefit.
That is incredibly unfortunate for anyone on the receiving end of this behavior, it may cause a lot
of pain and heartache with all the money problems this will most likely put the homeowners
through. Many people suffer from money troubles as well as issue with their homes, it’s very sad
that many people are left stranded with bad work done on their home when no other contractor
will touch it in fear that they could be included in charges against the original contractors. This is
what happened to my family as well as Mrs. Teague, no one wanted to try to help us restore our
home because they did not want to be held accountable or be included in the current lawsuit with
the previous contractors who had done poor work on both our and Mrs. Teague’s homes. It is
Bailey 9
very unfair to homeowners to be left like this with no real way for us to receive help until we
have settled the claim with any other contractors. Overall, I believe there should be more
kindness expressed by contractors and homeowners alike to help each other when something has
happened, contractors could be a bit more generous and assist in fixing a home to the best of
their ability without repairing the home so that they cannot be included in any legal issues that
are occurring beforehand, and homeowners could be more clear with their wants to any
contractor they plan on hiring so there are no issues with how they conduct their business that
completed correctly, in full, and to their customer’s satisfaction. Mrs. Teague faced hardships
contractor who could not admit that the job was not right for him. The contractor, much like the
one we have struggled with decided to leave the home in utter disarray and take money from the
homeowners, believing nothing that they had done was incorrect. A majority of homeowners are
taken advantage of like this because of how easy it is for irresponsible and unprofessional
contractors to slip through cracks in the regulations that were set for their practices. In regards to
our situation I sincerely hope that the contractors have since learned their lesson and will refrain
from participating in questionable as well as rudimentary acts. Regulations should be air tight
and better enforced on contractors. Someone with basic construction knowledge could just as
easily print off business cards and claim to be a contractor to make a quick buck, instead of
actually taking the time to learn their trade of choice and give homeowners good quality work.
Not every contractor is bad or not trustworthy but communication and a large amount of research
should be put into the efforts when finding someone you can trust to repair or remodel your
Bailey 10
home. Contractors should be put through more intense testing to learn their trade and prove that
they do not have any unsavory intentions to use their position to take advantage of naïve or
uneducated homeowners. On the other hand many homeowners will not know everything about
how to install siding or fix a leaky window, so it would be wrong to critique their actions or
craftsmanship without actually knowing how it is done, if it is blatantly wrong and there is proof
of it then the homeowner would be correct to correct their work. Overall, regulations should be
improved to help homeowners and contractors to work together to complete necessary duties in
Works Cited
Abubey, Faith. “How State Laws (Don't) Protect Homeowners With Contractor Issues.”
to-know/how-state-laws-dont-protect-homeowners-with-contractor-issues/329405585
https://www.osha.gov/pls/oshaweb/owadisp.show_document?p_id=10605&p_table=STA
NDARDS
“General Contractor Problems and How To Deal With Them.” Home Improvement Tips &
problems/.
Jepsen, Thomas. “2019 Ohio Contractor Licenses: HVAC, Electrical, Plumbing, Search.” 2019
Kaysen, Ronda. “Being Ghosted By the Contractor.” The New York Times, The New York
the-contractor.html
Bailey 12
Murray, Jean. “Laws and Regulations Affecting Independent Contractors.” The Balance Small
and-regulations-affecting-independent-contractors-398603.
Serino, Danielle. “Why Ohio Is One of the Worst States When It Comes to Protecting
www.wkyc.com/article/money/why-ohio-is-one-of-the-worst-states-when-it-comes-to-
protecting-homeowners-from-bad-contractors/439997932.
https://constructionliens.uslegal.com/state-laws/ohio-construction-lien-law/
difference-between-an-independent-contractor-and-an-employee