You are on page 1of 13

International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)

Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org


Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Planning , Analyzing and Designing of Indoor


Stadium Building By Using STAAD Pro
T.Subramani1, P.Sankar2, K.Annadurai3, P.Jothikannan4, R.Raja5
1
Professor & Dean, Department of Civil Engineering, VMKV Engineering College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation
(Deemed to be University), Salem, India
2
Assistant Professor, Department of Civil Engineering, VMKV Engineering College, Vinayaka Missions Research
Foundation (Deemed to be University), Salem, India
3,4,5
UG Student, , Department of Civil Engineering, VMKV Engineering College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation
(Deemed to be University), Salem, India

ABSTRACT
Planning analysis and designing of indoor stadium is our project which is to propose at Salem. Stadium for badminton &
basket ball four court hall with 113 x 70 . Dimensions with ground floor only. The entire plan is about 7910 sq.m. There is
some space left around the building for parking of cars. The plan also gives details of arrangement of various furniture like
chairs, sofa etc. The indoor stadium consists of a Stage, Separate rest rooms for both , Separation of VIP BLOCK, Office ,Two
wheeler & four wheeler parking’s are providing in separate. Book shop & boutique shop, Gymnasium Practice hall. Drafting
method for design the plan is by AutoCAD. The framed type of construction is used for the construction and the designing of
structure is carried out by limit state method with the IS 456: 2000 code book. The plan and structural elements are designed
using staad pro and AutoCAD. This study explained about necessary and designing purpose of indoor stadium.
Keywords: Planning, Analysis, Designing and Indoor Stadium

1. INTRODUCTION
A modern stadium is a place or venue for (mostly) outdoor sports, concerts, or other events and consists of a field or
stage either partly or completely surrounded by a structure designed to allow spectators to stand or sit and view the
event. His first stadiums to be built in the modern era were basic facilities, designed for the single purpose of fitting as
many spectators in as possible.
2. SPECIFICATIONS
2.1 Planning of Indoor Stadium:
The proposed building with ground floor plan and reinforced concrete framed type of construction is adopted. The
proposed stadium is to accommodate 2500 persons.
2.2 Foundation
Earth work excavation for foundation for all column footings will be excavated and will be in cement concrete 1:1:2
mix, 3200 mm wide and 4800 mm thick laid at 2480 mm below ground level. The masonry footings will be in
brickwork in cement mortar 1:6. The footing size is 3200 x 4800 mm. The foundation concrete for framed structure, all
main wall and footing of cement concrete of 1:1:2 mix, will be provided.
2.3 Basement
The basement will be in 1st class brick work in cement mortar 1:5, and 300 mm thick above ground level for all walls.
The basement will be filled with clean sand to a depth of 300 mm. A damp proof course in cement mortar 1:3, 20 thick
will be provided for all walls at basement level.
2.4 Sand Filling in Basement
The basement filled up with clean sand to a depth of 300mm and it should be compacted with water as per standard
specifications.

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 137


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

2.5 Damp Proof Course


A Damp proof course using cement mortar 1:3 of 20mm thick will be Provide for all main walls at basement level
2.6 Flooring Concrete
The flooring concrete of 1:1:2 mix with suitable thick will be provided should be finished above the sand filling and it
by mosaic tiles.
2.7 Super Structure
All the walls will be in I class brick work in cement mortar 1:5, using first class bricks, and 300 mm thick. The
partition walls will be 150 mm thick in brick work in cement mortar 1:5, using first class brick. The height of all walls
will be 3500 mm above floor level. All the walls including basement will be plastered smooth with cement mortar 1:4
externally and 1:6 internally for 12.5 thick. Parapet walls 300 mm thick and 1m high will be provided all around.
2.8 Roofing
The roofing will be of R.C.C 1:1:2 mix, 300 mm thick flat slabs over all the rooms. A weathering course in brick jelly
lime concrete plastered with combination mortar 1:1:2 mix, 100 mm thick will be provided over the slab.
2.9 Plastering for Super Structure
All walls will be plastered smooth surface with cement Mortar 1:3, 12 mm thick.
2.10 Sound Proofing for Ceiling & Wall
In ceiling of all rooms and walls are soundproofed with latest type soundproofing material.
2.11 Weathering Course
A Weathering course using brick jelly concrete will be provided average75 mm thick over the slab and finished with
two course of hydraulic pressed Mangalore flat tiles using cement mortar 1:5 mixed with 10% of crude Oil.
2.12 White Washing
One primer coat and two coats of colour wash to be done for all plastered wall surface.
2.13 Column
Rectangular column 1:1:2 mix with 0.3 m x 0.6 m.
2.14 Beam
Square beam 1:1:2 concrete mix with 0.6 x 0.6 m consider as length & width dimensions.

3. STRUCTURAL DESIGN
3.1 Design of Slab
fck = 25 N/mm2
fy = 415 N/mm2
Room size = 20 x 3.6 m
Support = 300 mm
Thickness of slab =200mm
3.1.2 Type of Slab
ly /lx = 20/ 3.6 = 5.55>2
Hence designed as two way slab
3.1.3 Load Calculation
Consider 1m width of slab
Live load = 2 KN/m2
Self -weight of slab = 1 x b x D x unit weight
=1 x 1 x 0.20 x 25
= 5 KN/m2
Weight of floor finish =1x 1 x 0.05 x 20= 1.0 KN/m2
Total load = 8 KN/m

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 138


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Design load = 8 x 1.5 = 12 KN/m


3.1.4 Main Reinforcement
Mx = 0.87 fy Ast d ( 1- fyAst / fckbd)
26.79 x 106 = 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 180 ( 1- 415 x Ast / 25 x 1000 x 180)
5.99Ast2–64.98x103Ast+26.79 x 106 = 0
Ast min = 429.26mm2
3.1.5 Spacing
Assume 10 mm dia bars
S = ast/Ast x b = 78.54/429.26 x 1000= 190mm
3d = 3 x 180= 540 mm
300 mm c/c
Provide 10 mm dia bars @ spacing 240 mm c/c distance.
3.1.6 Distributor Reinforcement
Ast min = 0.12 / 100 x B x D
= 0.12 /100 x 1000 x 200
= 240 mm2
3.1.7 Spacing
Assume 8mm dia of distribution steel
S = ast /Astmin x b = (50.26/240) x 1000
= 210 mm
5d = 5 x 180 = 900 mm
450 mm
Provide 8 mm dia bars @ spacing 210 mm c/c
Figure 1 shows the Reinforcement detail of one way slab.

Figure 1 Reinforcement detail of one way slab

3.2 Design Of Beams


Center to center distance leff =20.3m
B =600mm
D =560mm
D =600mm (assumption)
fy =415N/mm2
fck =25N/mm2
Q =3.45
%Ast =1.197%
3.2.1 Load Calculation
Self-weight of beam =b x D x unit Weight
=0.6x0.6x 25=9KN/m
Slab floor finish (1) = perpendicular distance x tk x unit Weight
=1.8 x 0.05 x 20=1.8 KN/m

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 139


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Slab self Weight(1) =1.8 x 0.20 x 25=9 KN/m


Slab floor finish (2) = perpendicular distance x tk x unit Weight
=3 x 0.05 x 20=3 KN/m
Slab self Weight(2) =3 x 0.20 x 25=15 KN/m
Wall load =0.3x 3.6 x 19=20.52KN/m
Total load =58.32 SAY 60KN/M
Factored load =60 x 1.5 Fd=90KN/m
3.2.2 Type of Section
Mulim =Qubd2=3.45 x 600 x 13002
Mulim =3498.3×106 N.mm
Mulim<Mu
Hence the section shall be designed as doubly reinforced section
3.2.3 Reinforcement
Ast1 =Mulim/(0.87 x fy x (d-0.42 XuMaximum))
=3498.3 x 106/ (0.87 x 415 x (1260-0.42 x 0.48 x 1260)
Ast1 =9631.6mm2
Ast1 =MUA/(0.87 X fy x (d-d’))
=1137.7 x 106/(0.87 x415 x (1260-40))
2
Ast2 =2582.85mm
Total Ast =Ast1+Ast2
Ast =12214.45mm2
Provide 32mm dia bars
Ast =804.24mm2
NOS =Ast/ast=12214.45/804.24=16nos
Ast =16 x π x 322/4=12867.96mm2
Provide 16nos of 32mm dia bars as tension reinforcement
3.2.4 Area of Compression Reinforcement
d’/d =40/1260=0.03 for fsc=354 N/mm2
Asc = Mua/fsc(d-d’) = 1137.7 x 106/( 354 x (1260-40))
Asc =2634.29mm2
But min Asc =0.85bd/fy=0.85 x 600 x 1260/415=1548.43mm2
Provide 20mm dia bars
Asc =314.16 mm2
No’s =Asc/asc=1548.43/314.16=5nos
Asc =5 x π x 202/4=1570.79mm2
Provide 5nos of 20mm dia bars as compression reinforcement.
Figure 2 shows the Reinforcement detail of beams.

Figure 2 Reinforcement detail of beam


3.3 Design of Rectangular Column
Size of column = 300 X 600mm
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 140
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

fck = 25 N/mm2
fy = 415 N/mm2
3.3.1 Load Calculation

3.3.1.1 Slab
Weight of slab (1) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 10 x 1.8 x 0.20 x 25 = 90 KN
Weight of slab ff (1) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 10 x 1.80 x 0.05 x 20 = 18 KN
Weight of slab (2) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 10 x 3 x 0.20 x 25 = 150 KN
Weight of slab ff (2) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 10 x 3 x 0.05 x 20 = 30 KN
Weight of slab (3) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 4.1 x 3 x 0.20 x 25 = 61.5 KN
Weight of slab ff (3) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 4.1 x 3 x 0.05 x 20 = 12.3 KN
Weight of slab (4) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 4.1 x 1.8 x 0.20 x 25 = 36.9 KN
Weight of slab ff (4) = L x B x D x unit Weight
= 4.1 x 1.8 x 0.05 x 20 = 7.38 KN
Live load (1) = 10 x 1.8 x 2.0 = 36 KN
Live load (2) = 10 x 3 x 2.0 = 60KN
Live load (3) = 4.1 x 3 x 2.0 = 24.6 KN
Live load (4) = 4.1 x 1.8 x 2.0 = 14.76 KN
3.3.1.2 Beam
Beam (1) = L x B x D x unit Weight
=10 x 0.6 x 1.30 x 25 = 195 KN
Beam (2) = 1.8 x 0.6 x 1.30 x 25 = 35.1 KN
Beam (3) = 3.0 x 0.6 x 1.30 x 25 = 58.5 KN
Beam (4) = 4.1 x 0.6 x 1.30 x 25 = 79.95 KN
3.3.1.3 Wall
Wall load (1) = L x B x H x unit Weight
= 10 x 0.3 x 3.6 x 19 = 205.2 KN
Wall load (2) = 1.8 x 0.3 x 3.6 x 19
= 36.93 KN
Wall load (3) = 3.0 x 0.3 x 3.6 x 19
=61.56 KN
Wall load (4) = 4.1 x 0.3 x 3.6 x 19
= 84.13 KN
3.3.1.4 Column
Self-weight of column = L x B x H x unit Weight
= 0.3 x 0.6 x 3.6 x 25=16.2 KN
Sum of all above loads = 1314.38 KN
No of floor consideration = 1320 x 2 =2640 KN
Say W = 2650 KN
3.3.1.5 Result
Size of column = 300 x 600 mm
Longitudinal reinforcement = 6nos of 22mm dia bars
Transverse reinforcement = 6mm dia at 300 mm c/c
Figure 3 shows the Reinforcement of R.C.C. Column.

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 141


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Figure 3 Reinforcement of R.C.C. Column

3.4 Design of Footing


Size of column =300 x 600mm
Safe bearing capacity =200 KN/m2
fck = 30 N/mm2
fy = 415 N/mm2
Axial load of footing = 2650 KN
Assume the self Weight of footing as10%of the column load
W1 =10/100 x 2650
= 265 KN
Total load on soil =2650+265=2915 KN
Area of footing required = total load /sbc
= 2915/200
= 14.57m2
Since it is a rectangular column
3.4.1 Tension Reinforcement

3.4.1.1 In Long Direction


MUL = 0.87 fy Ast d ( 1- fyAst / fckbd)
1312.84 x 106 = 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 640 (1- 415 x Ast / 30 x 3200 x 640)
1.56Ast2–231.07x103Ast+1312.84x106= 0
Provide 14 nos of 16mm dia bars in long direction at uniform spacing
3.4.1.2 In Shorter Direction
MUS = 0.87 fy Ast d ( 1- fyAst / fckbd)
904.64 x 106 = 0.87 x 415 x Ast x 640 (1- 415 x Ast / 30 x 4800 x 640)
1.04Ast2–231.07x103Ast+904.64x106= 0
AstL = 3986.53 mm2
Provide 20nos of 16mm dia bars at central band.
Figure 4 shows the Reinforcement details of footing.

Figure 4 Reinforcement detail of Footing

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 142


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

4. STAAD REPORT
Figure 5 shows the whole structure of the building.

Y
X
Z L oad 1

Figure 5 Whole Structure

Figure 6 shows the 3D Rendering View.

Figure 6 3D Rendered view

Figure 7 shows the bending moment diagram.

Mz (k N- m)
20 19 15.4 20
10 10
1646
150 147
10 1000 2000 3000
3292 10
20 - 13 20

Figure 7 Bending Moment diagram

Figure 8 shows the shear force diagram.

Fy(N )
4000 0 3771 1 4000 0
2000 0 2000 0
150 147
2000 0 1000 2000 3000
3292 2000 0
4000 0 - 35529 4000 0

Figure 8 Shear Force Diagram

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 143


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Figure 9 shows the Maximum bending moment at critical beam.

Figure 9 Maximum bending moment at critical beam


4.1 B E A M N O .419 D E S I G N
M25 Fe415 (Main) Fe415 (Sec.)

LENGTH: 5399.9 mm SIZE: 400.0 mm X 400.0 mm COVER: 25.0 mm

SUMMARY OF REINF. AREA (Sq.mm)


--------------------------------------------------------
SECTION 0.0 mm 1350.0 mm 2700.0 mm 4049.9 mm 5399.9 mm
--------------------------------------------------------
TOP 507.50 0.00 0.00 0.00 392.32
REINF. (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm)

BOTTOM 0.00 302.31 327.88 302.31 0.00


REINF. (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm) (Sq. mm)
-------------------------------------------------------
SUMMARY OF PROVIDED REINF. AREA
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
SECTION 0.0 mm 1350.0 mm 2700.0 mm 4049.9 mm 5399.9 mm
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
TOP 7-10í 2-10í 2-10í 2-10í 5-10í
REINF. 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s)

BOTTOM 2-12í 3-12í 3-12í 3-12í 2-12í


REINF. 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s) 1 layer(s)

SHEAR 2 legged 8í 2 legged 8í 2 legged 8í 2 legged 8í 2 legged 8í


Figure 10 shows the Reinforcement details for beam.

Figure 10 Reinforcement Details for Beam

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 144


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Figure 11 shows the maximum bending moment at critical column.

Figure 11 Maximum bending moment at critical column


4.2 C O L U M N N O. 179 D E S I G N

M25 Fe415 (Main) Fe415 (Sec.)

LENGTH: 3500.0 mm CROSS SECTION: 300.0 mm X 600.0 mm COVER: 40.0 mm

** GUIDING LOAD CASE: 1 END JOINT: 49 SHORT COLUMN

REQD. STEEL AREA : 1061.66 Sq.mm.


REQD. CONCRETE AREA: 132706.95 Sq.mm.
MAIN REINFORCEMENT : Provide 12 - 12 dia. (0.75%, 1357.17 Sq.mm.)
(Equally distributed)
TIE REINFORCEMENT : Provide 8 mm dia. rectangular ties @ 190 mm c/c

SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT REQUIRED (KNS-MET)


---------------------------------------------------
Puz : 2343.50 Muz1 : 169.37 Muy1 : 79.95

INTERACTION RATIO: 0.26 (as per Cl. 39.6, IS456:2000)

SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED (KNS-MET)


----------------------------------------------------
WORST LOAD CASE: 1
END JOINT: 49 Puz : 2432.15 Muz : 187.42 Muy : 86.98 IR: 0.24
SECTION CAPACITY BASED ON REINFORCEMENT PROVIDED (KNS-MET)
------------------------------------------------------
WORST LOAD CASE: 1
END JOINT: 49 Puz: 2863.79 Muz : 0.00 Muy : 0.00 IR: 0.52
Figure 12 shows the reinforcement details for column.

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 145


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Figure 12 Reinforcement Details for Column


4.3 Concrete Take Off
(FOR BEAMS AND COLUMNS DESIGNED ABOVE)

Total volume of concrete = 286.03 CU.METER

BAR DIA WEIGHT


(in mm) (in New)
-------- --------
8 57056.80
10 36495.50
12 45453.85
16 21321.43
20 5828.88
------------
TOTAL= 166156.48

5. DRAWING
Figure 13 shows the Blue print of the building.

Figure 13 Blue Print

6. CONCLUSION
This research concluded that combination of AutoCAD and STAAD Pro gave as a perfect & accurate design as well as
analysis report with low time consumption. Also we gave the advanced retrofitting technique for construction & and
economical usage of materials, because the available qualified materials only used for this study.
References
[1] T.Subramani., A.Arul, "Design And Analysis Of Hybrid Composite Lap Joint Using Fem" International Journal
of Engineering Research and Applications, Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 5), pp 289- 295, 2014.
[2] T.Subramani, D.Sakthi Kumar S.Badrinarayanan "Fem Modelling And Analysis Of Reinforced Concrete
Section With Light Weight Blocks Infill " International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications,
Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 6), pp 142 - 149, 2014.
[3] T.Subramani, S.Poongothai, S.Priyanka , " Analytical Study Of T Beam Column Joint Using FEM Software " ,
International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science (IJETTCS), Volume 6, Issue 3,
May - June 2017 , pp. 148-156 , ISSN 2278-6856
[4] T.Subramani, P.Babu, S.Priyanka , " Strength Study On Fibre Reinforced Concrete Using Palmyra Palm Fibre
Using Fem Software " , International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science
(IJETTCS), Volume 6, Issue 3, May - June 2017 , pp. 198-207 , ISSN 2278-6856.
[5] T.Subramani, S.Chitra, S.Priyanka & J.Karthick Rajan, Modeling And Analysis Of Concrete Filled Steel
Tubular Beams Using Finite Element Analysis, International Journal Of Mechanical And Production

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 146


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

Engineering Research And Development (IJMPERD), Vol. 8, Special Issue 2, Pp 429-436, Nov 2018, ISSN (P):
2249-6890; ISSN (E): 2249-8001
[6] T.Subramani, S.Vishnupriya, “Finite Element Analysis of a Natural Fiber (Maize) Composite Beam”,
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 1), pp 1 – 7, 2014,
[7] T.Subramani and M.Kavitha, “Analysis Of Reliability Of Steel Frame Systems With Semi-Rigid Connections
Using Numerical Method And Finite Element Analysis”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research
(IJAER), Volume 10, Number 38,Special Issues, pp.28240-28246, 2015.
[8] T.Subramani, A.Mohammed Ali, R.Karthikeyan, E.Panner Selvan , K.Periyasamy , " Analytical Study Of T-
Beam Using ANSYS " , International Journal of Emerging Trends & Technology in Computer Science
(IJETTCS), Volume 6, Issue 3, May - June 2017 , pp. 259-266 , ISSN 2278-6856.
[9] T.Subramani, Periasamy, “A. Study on Behaviour of Stud Type Shear Connector in Composite Beam Using
ANSYS”. International Journal of Engineering & Technology, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3.10, p. 54-58, july 2018. ISSN
2227-524X.
[10] T.Subramani, V. Sukumar, “Castellated Beam with and without Stiffners Using ANSYS”. International
Journal of Engineering & Technology, [S.l.], v. 7, n. 3.10, p. 94-97, july 2018. ISSN 2227-524X.
[11] T.Subramani, M.Piruntha, “Behaviour of CRP- Geopolymer Concrete Columns under Axial Loading using
ANSYS”, International Journal of Engineering & Technology, S.l.], v. 7,n (3.10), 203-206, july 2018. ISSN
2227-524X.
[12] T. Subramani, J. Balakrishnan, S. Priyanka & J. Karthick Rajan, Design And Analysis Of Stiffened Plate With
And Without Stiffener Using ANSYS, International Journal Of Mechanical And Production Engineering
Research And Development (IJMPERD), Vol. 8, Special Issue 2, Pp 461-468, Nov 2018, ISSN (P): 2249-6890;
ISSN (E): 2249-8001.
[13] T.Subramani, S.Subithabi, S.Priyanka & J.Karthick Rajan, Analysis Of Composite Shear Wall Using ANSYS,
International Journal Of Mechanical And Production Engineering Research And Development (IJMPERD), Vol.
8, Special Issue 2, pp 477-484, Nov 2018, ISSN (P): 2249-6890; ISSN (E): 2249-8001.
[14] T.Subramani and Athulya Sugathan, “Finite Element Analysis of Thin Walled- Shell Structures by ANSYS and
LS-DYNA”, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research,Vol.2, No.4, pp 1576-1587,2012.
[15] T.Subramani, A.Kumaresan., “ Advanced Cable Stayed Bridge Construction Process Analysis with ANSYS”,
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Volume. 4, Issue.6 (Version 1), pp 28-33, 2014,
[16] T.Subramani, R.Senthil Kumar, “Modelling and Analysis of Hybrid Composite Joint Using Fem in ANSYS”,
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6 (Version 1), pp 41- 46, 2014.
[17] T.Subramani., R.Manivannan, M.Kavitha, "Crack Identification In Reinforced Concrete Beams Using Ansys
Software" ,International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 6), pp
133 - 141, 2014.
[18] T.Subramani, M.Subramani, K.Prasath,"Analysis Of Three Dimensional Horizontal Reinforced Concrete
Curved Beam Using Ansys" International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Volume. 4, Issue.
6 (Version 6), pp 156 - 161, 2014.
[19] T.Subramani, K.Bharathi Devi, M.S.Saravanan , Suboth Thomas4, Analysis Of RC Structures Subject To
Vibration By Using Ansys,” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications Vol. 4, Issue
12(Version 5), pp.45-54, 2014
[20] T.Subramani, T.Krishnan, M.S.Saravanan , Suboth Thomas, “Finite Element Modeling On Behaviour Of
Reinforced Concrete Beam Column Joints Retrofitted With CFRP Sheets Using Ansys” International Journal of
Engineering Research and Applications Vol. 4, Issue 12(Version 5), pp.69 -76, 2014
[21] T.Subramani, S.Krishnan, Saravanan.M.S, Suboth Thomas “Analysis Of Retrofitting Non-Linear Finite
Element Of RCC Beam And Column Using Ansys” International Journal of Engineering Research and
Applications ,Vol. 4, Issue 12(Version 5), pp.77-87, 2014.
[22] T.Subramani, J.Jayalakshmi , " Analytical Investigation Of Bonded Glass Fibre Reinforced Polymer Sheets With
Reinforced Concrete Beam Using Ansys" , International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering &
Management (IJAIEM) , Volume 4, Issue 5, pp. 105-112 , 2015
[23] T.Subramani, M.S.Saravanan, “Analysis Of Non Linear Reinforced And Post Tensioned Concrete Beams Using
ANSYS”, International Journal of Applied Engineering Research (IJAER) International Journal of Applied
Engineering Research (IJAER), Volume 10, Number 38 Special Issues, pp.28247-28252, 2015
[24] T.Subramani, K.Balamurugan , " Finite Element Anaylsis Of Composite Element For FRP Reinforced Concrete
Slab By Using ANSYS" , International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management
(IJAIEM) , Volume 5, Issue 5, pp. 076-084 , 2016 .

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 147


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847

[25] T.Subramani, A.Kumaravel , " Analysis Of Polymer Fibre Reinforced Concrete Pavements By Using ANSYS" ,
International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM) , Volume 5, Issue
5, pp. 132-139 , 2016 .
[26] T.Subramani, M.Senthilkumar , " Finite Element Anaylsis Of RC Beams With Externally Bonded Simcon
Laminates By Using ANSYS" , International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering &
Management (IJAIEM) , Volume 5, Issue 5, pp. 148-155 , 2016 .
[27] T.Subramani, A.Selvam , " Studies On Economical Configuration Of RCC And Prestressed Shell Roofs By
Using ANSYS " , International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM) ,
Volume 5, Issue 5, pp. 182-191 , 2016 .
[28] T.Subramani, S.Sharmila, “Prediction of Deflection and Stresses of Laminated Composite Plate with Artificial
Neural Network Aid”, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Volume 4, Issue 6 (Version 1),
pp 51 -58, 2014.
[29] T.Subramani, K.Udhaya Kumar, “Damping Of Composite Material Structures with Riveted Joints”,
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 2), pp 1 – 5, 2014.
[30] T.Subramani, S.Sundar, M.Senthilkumar, “Investigation of the Behaviour for Reinforced Concrete Beam Using
Non Linear Three Dimensional Finite Elements”, International Journal of Modern Engineering Research,
Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 2), pp 13 -18, 2014,
[31] T.Subramani, and P.Shanmugam, “Seismic Analysis and Design of Industrial Chimneys By Using STAAD
PRO” International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Vol.2, Issue.4, pp 154-161, 2012.
[32] T.Subramani and D.Ponnuvel, “Seismic and stability Analysis of Gravity Dams Using STAAD Pro”
International Journal Of Engineering Research and Development, Vol.1, No.5, pp 44- 54, 2012.
[33] T.Subramani, B.Saravanan, J.Jayalakshmi, “Dynamic Analysis Of Flanged Shear Wall Using STAAD Pro",
International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications, Volume. 4, Issue. 6 (Version 6), pp 150 - 155,
2014.
[34] T.Subramani, K.Bharathi Devi, M.S.Saravanan, Suboth Thomas, “Analysis Of Seismic Performance Of Rock
Block Structures With STAAD Pro International Journal of Engineering Research and Applications Vol. 4, Issue
12(Version 5), pp.55- 68, 2014.

AUTHOR
Prof. Dr. T. Subramani Working as Professor and Dean of Civil Engineering in Vinayaka Missions
Kirupananda Variyar Engineering College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation (Deemed to be
University), Salem, Tamilnadu, India. Having more than 28 years of Teaching experience in Various
Engineering Colleges. He is serving as reviewer for many International Journals and also published 250
papers in International Journals. He has presented more than 100 papers in conferences, especially 70 in
International and 30 National Level. He has authored 07 books. Guided more than 259 students in PG
projects. Currently he is guiding 03 Ph.D., Research Scholars. He is serving as examiner and Valuer for
B.E & M.E Degree Theory and Practical Examinations for Madras University, Periyar University, Anna
University, Annamalai University and Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation [Deemed to be University].
He is Question paper setter and Valuer for UG and PG Courses of Civil Engineering in number of
Universities. He is serving as Chairman of Board Of Studies (Civil Engineering), Vinayaka Missions
Research Foundation [Deemed to be University], also a member of Board of studies in Periyar University.
He is Life Fellow in Institution of Engineers (India) and Institution of Valuers. Life member in number of
Technical Societies and Educational bodies like MISTE, MIGS, MIRC,ISRMTT, UWA, Salem District
Small and Tiny Association (SADISSTIA), SPC – Salem Productivity Council. He has delivered much
technical talk in various field. He is a Chartered Civil Engineer and Approved Valuer for many banks. He
is a Licensed Building Surveyor in Salem City Municipal Corporation-Salem, and Licensed Civil Engineer
in Salem Local Planning Authority- Salem. He is the recipient of many prestigious awards.

P. Sankar Completed his Master of Engineering in the branch of Structural Engineering at Government College
of Engineering, Salem, Anna University. Currently he is working as a Assistant Professor at V.M.KV.
Engineering College at Salem-308. Tamil Nadu, India. His work focus specifically on the flexural behaviour of
cold formed steel beams. His hobbies such as Swimming, Music, drawing, Reading books.

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 148


International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM)
Web Site: www.ijaiem.org Email: editor@ijaiem.org
Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 ISSN 2319 - 4847
K.Annadurai has completed his diploma in the branch of Civil Engineering in T.P.E.V.R Government
polytechnic, vellore, Tamilnadu, India. He is persuing B.E undergraduate degree in V.M.K.V Engineering
College, Vinayaga Missions Research Foundation, Deemed to be University, Salem, Tamilnadu, India. He has
well knowledge in estimating and experienced in building structures. His hobbies are cricket and volleyball.

P.Jothikannan is persuing B.E Under graduate in the branch of Civil Engineering at V.M.K.V.
Engineering College, Vinayaka missions Research Foundation, Deemed to be University, Salem,
Tamilnadu, India. His hobbies are playing Volleyball, drawing, Reading books

R.Raja has completed his Diploma in the branch of civil engineering in Imayam polytechnic College in 2011,
Kannanur, Tamilnadu, India.He is persuing B.E Under graduate in the branch of Civil Engineering at V.M.K.V.
Engineering College, Vinayaka Missions Research Foundation, Deemed to be University, Salem, Tamilnadu,
India. He has well knowledge in AUTOCAD drawing, Experienced in Building Structures. His hobbies are
playing Football, Kabadi and Cricket.

Volume 8, Issue 3, March 2019 Page 149

You might also like