Professional Documents
Culture Documents
-Derived from the Greek word “logike” or “logos” which means word, speech, discourse, argument, idea,
and plea, possessed of reason.
-The study of the methods and principles used to distinguish correct from incorrect reasoning.
-The science and art of correct thinking. As science it employs the same approach and attitude in
studying its object (arguments). It relies on careful observation, critical analysis and conclusive rational
proofs.
HISTORICAL BACKGROUND
-Traced back to the Greek Pre-Socratic philosophers starting with the Thales of Miletus around 585 B.C.
-Plato (428-347 B. C.)- At least began asking the veracity and validity of ideas and theories. It started a
way of seeing logic as an object of study. Later, logic became a branch of philosophy.
-Aristotle (384 B. C.)- He laid down the nature of reasoning. “Reasoning” is an argument in which certain
things being laid down, something other than necessary comes about through them.” SYLLOGISM.
ELEMENTS OF REASONING
1. Words
2. Statement
3. Argument
4. Judgement
DEDUCTIVE REASONING
Ex:
INDUCTIVE REASONING
Ex:
Socrates is mortal. (Particular statement)
- Word has a general meaning than term. Term is used to mean special words in particular fields
or subjects.
DEFINING A WORD
Arguments from definition- is an argument in which the conclusion is claimed to depend merely
upon the definition of some words or phrase used in the premises and conclusion.
Example Cases;
CLAIM OR STATEMENT- a sentence about which it makes sense to ask whether it is true or false. It has a
truth value.
KINDS OF SENTENCES:
1. Declarative : Asserting
2. Interrogative: Questioning
3. Imperative: Commanding
4. Exclamatory: Exclaiming
Ex. SCJ’s impeachment proceedings were closely Ex. PRRD is the president and Leni is the vice-
monitored by many people. president.
KINDS OF COMPOUNDS:
RULE:
- For any 2 statements “p” and “q”, the conjunction “p and q” is true when and only when both
component statement “p”, “q” are true. Otherwise it is false.
Ex: Pedro was found guilty in the criminal trial of physical injuries and he was held liable in the civil
trial to pay the damages resulted therein.
RULE:
- For any 2 statements p and q, the disjunction “p or q”, is false when and only when both
components p, q are false. Otherwise it is true.
Ex: 1. Either Atty. A cross-examined the witness or Atty. B cross examined the witness.
- These are formed with the form “ if p then q” where the symbols are filled by simple
statements.
- The 1st blank is called the antecedent and the 2nd blank is called the consequent of a conditional.
RULE:
- For any 2 statements p and q, the conditional “ if p then q” is false when and only when the
antecedent is true and the consequent is false. Otherwise it is true.
-these are also called “equivalence”, and they are formed with the expression “ if and only if”
RULE:
- For any 2 statements p and q, the biconditional “p if and only if q” is true when both p and q
have the same truth value.”
- The truth value of a negative statement depends on the truth value of the affirmative statement.
-it is formed with the word “not”, it is not the case that, or “it is false that”
-it is also formed with the expression “neither, nor”. (negation of a disjunction)
RULE:
- If the statement p is true, then not p is false, and if p is false then its negation not p is true.”
RELATIONS OF STATEMENTS
RULE:
-Two statements are equivalent if they have exactly the same truth value.
PATTERNS:
Ex. If Pedro committed the crime then he will go to prison, is equivalent to, If Pedro did not commit
the crime, then he will not go to prison.