Professional Documents
Culture Documents
11-26-18
Nicholas Adler
Written
Expression
With the current state of politics in America, our country is seeing a level of divide never
experienced before. Our political party system, enormous gaps between the rich and the poor,
and arguably unconventional leaders have created a chaotic political nightmare. Our nation is
still fighting against countless problems such as racism, poverty, homeless veterans, and wage
gaps.
These issues have many Americans frustrated as they go about their everyday lives. Why
can’t we just have normal politics that work to create a better country for all individuals? Well,
we can. But for centuries our current political and economic systems have failed to solve
problems such as equal pay, poverty, homelessness, healthcare epidemics, and equality for all
who work hard. So, if our current system has failed us for so long, and no solution is seeming to
socialism. Socialism is a complex idea, but it has the potential to end poverty, inequality,
homelessness, and racism altogether. In a socialist society, everyone would be equal in the
sense that we work to fulfill the needs of others instead of for a paycheck. No single person
For example, in a socialist society, a farmer would grow food for a doctor, and the
doctor would provide service to the farmer when needed in return. If we now add an architect
into the picture, the farmer still grows the food for the doctor and architect, and the doctor
provides medical services to both. The architect is in charge of building and maintaining their
homes. In this way of life, everyone is equal in the sense that they have no monetary worth.
They all have the same access to the same resources as long as they work. Essentially, they
exchange their services instead of money and are all dependent on each other. If everyone
This may sound like a simple, mindless solution, but it is not. There are many problems
with socialism that we have to dig into deeper to understand. One of which is the idea that if
everyone is equal with no potential to earn more, what will drive them to innovate and provide
better service? In the current world, making more money is what gives us incentive to provide
to customers. But in a socialist society, we will have no incentive to provide more than what is
needed because there is no better reward. This will lead to mediocre service and innovation will
People always want more and never seem to be satisfied. We want more money, better food,
expensive cell phones, and any product that makes our life better. Socialism would take away
the privilege of having access to any products that we want. This could have devastating
consequences if we take into account human greed. People could end up stealing and
committing more crimes than ever before. As Gandhi famously stated, “Earth provides enough
to satisfy every man’s needs, but not every man’s greed’s.” According to scientist Annie
Leonard, the United States makes up 5% of the global population but consumes over 30% of
global resources. This shows that cultures such as the U.S. are fundamentally greedy and take
more than their share when they can. This is why we almost all own more than one pair of
shoes, over 10 separate outfits, 3 bathing suits, the list goes on and on. We all have more than
we need, we have what we want. And socialism is about needs, not wants. This is something
However, if we set aside all greed and what currently makes us happy, socialism could
be achievable if looked at different. If we all have the desire to live peacefully and equally,
there is essentially nothing stopping us. We could be happy from interacting with our
community, sharing resources, and enjoying nature. As long as everyone is on board, there
socialism could potentially work if we change the way we distribute resources. A singular
government would not be able to efficiently distribute all vital resources to its entire
population. In order for socialism to succeed, people would have to distribute resources
One of which is that no one would want difficult jobs if they are valued the same. For
example, no one wants to be a heart surgeon if they are paid the same as a fast food employee,
and both are in demand. It is mindless to flip burgers all day compared to save people lives by
performing precise organ transplants. Many people will argue that the surgeon deserves more
than the burger flipper. Research published by time magazine stated that humans are wired to
be lazy in every way possible. Whether leftover genetics from the nomads to lay down
whenever possible and save energy for the next hunt, or simply to rest your brain whenever
possible, simply because it gives us pleasure which wires us to do so, humans will always
abolishing the value of material goods is also dangerous on its own. With no way to measure
the value of a product in a socialist society, how do we decide who gets what? What if one
person wants extra carrots instead of salmon? How can we know what is worth what? We
would not be able to. People would constantly be fighting over items because money would not
be there to decide who can own what. This is why socialism would fail according to Boettke.
While everyone has different opinions on socialism, research can help shed light on
arguments as well as be able to portray ideas so that the everyday reader can understand,
everyone happy, we need to explore the idea to see if we can create a utopian society. We will
not know for sure until we try. History may prove socialism wrong but perhaps the system can
I believe that socialism is possible but that it would take a long and hard journey to
perfect. It would need to be something that humans really want to succeed. The political and
economic futures of America are a mystery, and one that keeps many people on edge. The
future will be faced with protests, riots, and rallies like we have never seen before- some of
which may have to do with the idea of socialism. Once we get used to the idea of socialism and
References
Friedman, S. (2017). What Kind of Society Might Actually Work? Creating a Socialism
that Meets Needs. Against the Current, 31(6), 32-36.
Boettke, P, Leeson, P. (2005). Still Impossible After All These Years: Reply to Caplan. Astoria.
17(1/2), 155-170.
Birzer, B.J. 2015. How Socialism Fails. American Conservative. 14(4), 54-55.
Bardhan, P. Roemer, J.E. 1994. On the Workability of Market Socialism. The Journal of
Economic Perspectives, 8(2), 177-181.