You are on page 1of 4

CASE REPORT Peter Andersen, MD, Section Editor

Pediatric odontogenic fibromyxoma of the mandible: Case report


and review of the literature

Grace C. Haser, BA,1* Henry K. Su, BA,1 Juan C. Hernandez–Prera, MD,2 Azita S. Khorsandi, MD,3 Beverly Y. Wang, MD,4 Mark L. Urken, MD1,5

1
Department of Otolaryngology, Thyroid, Head, and Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation, New York, New York, 2Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai, New York, New York,
3
Department of Radiology, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, 4Department of Pathology, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York, 5Department of Otolaryngology
– Head and Neck Surgery, Mount Sinai Beth Israel, New York, New York.

Accepted 14 April 2015


Published online 18 July 2015 in Wiley Online Library (wileyonlinelibrary.com). DOI 10.1002/hed.24090

ABSTRACT: Background. Odontogenic fibromyxoma is an uncommon Conclusion. A case of pediatric odontogenic fibromyxoma in the mandi-
benign tumor arising from the maxillofacial bones. Fibromyxomas are ble is described. Although rare in the pediatric population, odontogenic
rare in children under 10 years of age. Although this tumor is reported fibromyxomas should be included as a differential diagnostic considera-
most frequently in the mandible for the general population, it has rarely tion when evaluating tumors of the maxillofacial skeleton. Accurate path-
been reported in the mandible in children <10 years of age. ologic diagnosis is critical to ensure proper management. V C 2015 Wiley

Methods. We reviewed the 39 reported cases of odontogenic fibromyx- Periodicals, Inc. Head Neck 38: E25–E28, 2016
oma in children under the age of 10. We add 1 case to the literature.
KEY WORDS: odontogenic myxoma, odontogenic fibromyxoma, pedi-
Results. This case represents the seventh case of odontogenic fibromyx-
atric tumors, mandibular tumors, maxillary tumors
oma of the mandible in a child under the age of 10 years reported in the
English literature.

INTRODUCTION In this study, we describe a child who presented with


an odontogenic fibromyxoma in the mandible. Although
Odontogenic fibromyxoma is an uncommon benign tumor
this tumor is reported most frequently in the mandible
of mesenchymal origin. It predominantly arises from the
compared to the maxilla in the general population, it has
maxillofacial bones and has a greater predilection for the
rarely been reported in the mandible in children <10
mandible compared to the maxilla.1 It represents 3% to
years of age.
8% of odontogenic tumors and cysts.2 These fibromyxo-
mas occur most frequently during the second through
fourth decades of life and are rare in children under 10 MATERIALS AND METHODS
years of age.3 Most patients with odontogenic fibromyxo-
mas present with painless swelling; however, in some This study received exemption from our local institu-
cases, patients may present with one or more symptoms, tional review board. We reviewed all clinical, radiologic,
including loosening of the teeth, impacted teeth, maloc- and pathologic records associated with this case.
clusion,4 and paresthesias of the mandibular nerve.1 A literature review using the terms “myxoma,”
Numerous diagnostic pitfalls exist for this unusual “fibromyxoma,” “pediatric,” “maxilla,” “mandible,” and
entity. The radiologic appearance of odontogenic fibro- “jaws” were searched in PubMed. References from all
myxoma is variable and overlaps with that of head and identified studies were also cross referenced. All studies
neck malignancies.5 Histologically, odontogenic fibro- written in English that reported on odontogenic myxo-
myxomas may resemble other myxoid lesions,3 confound- mas/fibromyxomas in the head and neck region in chil-
ing pathologic diagnosis. dren under 10 years of age were included if they
Odontogenic fibromyxomas may behave in a locally specified age of patients, tumor location, management,
aggressive manner, and local recurrence after surgical and follow-up information.
treatment is a concern.3 The optimal management strategy
remains controversial, with some authors advocating for a Literature review
more conservative surgical approach.6
A literature review revealed 39 cases of odontogenic
myxoma or fibromyxoma in the maxillofacial bones in
children <10 years old, of which 6 were located in the
mandible7–11 (Table 1), 32 were located in the max-
*Corresponding author: G. C. Haser, Department of Otolaryngology, Thyroid
Head and Neck Cancer (THANC) Foundation, 10 Union Square East, Suite 5B, illa,6,7,12–30 and 1 was located in both the maxilla and the
New York, NY 10003. E-mail: ghaser@thancfoundation.org mandible.31

HEAD & NECK—DOI 10.1002/HED JANUARY 2016 E25


HASER ET AL.

TABLE 1. Odontogenic myxoma/fibromyxoma of the mandible in children under 10 years of age.

Author (year) Patient age, y Sex Location of tumor Treatment Follow-up Recurrence
7
Ghosh (1973) 5 M Mandible Excision of tumor, hemimandibulectomy 25 y No
Ghosh (1973)7 2 M Mandible Excision of tumor, hemimandibulectomy 24 y No
Ataman (1993)8 7 M Mandible Curettage 1y No
Li (2006)9 7 M Mandible Enucleation and curettage 7y No
Shahoon (2009)10 8 M Mandible En bloc resection 3y No
Mauro (2013)11 6 M Mandible Enucleation and curettage 6 mo No

CASE REPORT fibromyxoid sarcoma. The biopsy was diagnostic for


myxoma/fibromyxoma.
A 6-year-old boy presented with a mass in the left
The patient underwent a hemimandibulectomy and
mandible with direct extension into the left neck, which
reconstruction with a fibular free flap. Because of the
had reportedly been growing for 6 months. The patient
location of the tumor, it was necessary to sacrifice the
had no complaints of pain, fever, chills, or loss of inferior alveolar nerve, which was grafted with a sural
appetite. nerve interposition graft. The submandibular gland was
An MRI of the neck revealed an expansile lesion of the removed as part of the specimen. The fibular free flap
left hemimandible, extending from the level of the sym- was held in place with a rigid fixation plate. The patient
physis to the body with involvement of the proximal por- tolerated the operation well.
tion of the left ramus of the mandible. The tumor The resection specimen showed a 5.8 cm well-
encompassed the course of the inferior alveolar nerve circumscribed, encapsulated mass arising from the mandib-
canal and extended into the left submandibular space ular bone (Figure 2). The mass exhibited a gelatinous trans-
without extension to the floor of the mouth. It remained lucent cut surface with focal white rubbery areas. The
deep to the platysma muscle. None of the lymph nodes histological sections showed a spindle-to-stellate shaped
identified in either side of the neck met the criteria for cell proliferation in a variable myxoid and collagenized
significant adenopathy (Figure 1). stroma. The morphology of the cells was bland and
An incisional biopsy was performed and showed a spin- revealed no significant nuclear pleomorphism or increased
dle cell proliferation in a myxoid background. The tumor mitotic activity. No tumor necrosis was present. Residual
cells lacked pleomorphism with no overt mitotic activity. bony trabeculae were observed. A small rest of the odonto-
Immunohistochemical stain showed that the tumor cells genic epithelium was identified, confirming the diagnosis
were negative for smooth muscle actin, desmin, S-100 of an odontogenic myxoma/fibromyxoma (Figure 3). Surgi-
protein, and CD34. Interphase fluorescence in situ hybrid- cal resection margins were negative for tumor.
ization studies were negative for FUS gene rearrange- The patient’s rigid fixation plate was scheduled to be
ment, excluding the differential diagnosis of low grade removed 3 months after the initial surgery to ensure

FIGURE 1. MRI. Axial T2-weighted (A) and coronal contrast-enhanced (B) fat-suppressed images demonstrate an expansile, septated, enhancing
lesion of the body, and symphysis of the mandible (arrows). This lesion is hyperintense on T2-weighted images and shows enhancement on
administration of contrast. Low signal septation of this lesion is noted.

E26 HEAD & NECK—DOI 10.1002/HED JANUARY 2016


PEDIATRIC ODONTOGENIC FIBROMYXOMA OF THE MANDIBLE

odontogenic in origin because of the near exclusive inci-


dence in tooth-bearing regions of the maxillofacial bones.3
Thus, odontogenic fibromyxoma most commonly arises in
the molar and premolar regions of the mandible or max-
illa,3 although it has been found in other areas and even
other bones, such as the lateral skull base.32 It is more com-
mon in the mandible than in the maxilla5; however, our
review of the literature found only 6 cases of mandibular
odontogenic fibromyxoma in pediatric patients under 10
years of age compared with 32 cases of maxillary odonto-
genic fibromyxoma in the same population (Table 1).
Hence, the current case represents the seventh case reported
in the English literature. There was additionally 1 case of a
patient with odontogenic fibromyxomas in both the mandi-
ble and the maxilla.31 Other authors have noted that odon-
togenic fibromyxomas have occurred exclusively in the
maxilla in infants21,30; however, the basis of this observa-
tion is unclear. Moreover, given the small sample size of
FIGURE 2. Lateral view of the resected left mandible. The mass is
this review, it is not possible to establish a trend.
well-circumscribed and encapsulated and arises from the man-
dibular bone.
Histologically, odontogenic fibromyxoma is composed
of randomly oriented, cytologically bland stellate-to-
spindle shaped cells embedded in the mucoid or myxoid
stroma. Some tumors exhibit a prominent collagenous
stoma and are designated as myxofibroma/fibromyxoma.
proper growth and development. The patient will undergo Nests of odontogenic epithelium may be present but are
placement of dental implants at that time. not required for establishing the diagnosis.33 On gross
pathology, fibromyxomas are generally gelatinous, unen-
capsulated, and well-delineated masses.3 The radiographic
DISCUSSION appearance is variable; however, most are radiolucent and
The incidence of odontogenic fibromyxoma is highest in multilocular with well-defined borders.5
the second, third, and fourth decades of life.3 Odontogenic Because odontogenic fibromyxomas are rare and may
fibromyxomas are rarely reported in children under 10 be misinterpreted as other benign myxoid tumors or as
years or adults over 50 years.3 In a review of 164 cases of malignant tumors, an accurate diagnosis is essential.
odontogenic fibromyxoma between 1965 and 1995, Kaffe Patients with odontogenic fibromyxoma generally present
et al5 reported only 12 cases (7.3%) in patients under 10 with painless swelling and/or deformity of the maxillofa-
years old. Some studies have found these tumors more fre- cial region.4 Occasionally, patients present with mild
quently in adult women than in men, although others have symptoms, most often involving dentition.4 This symp-
found roughly equal ratios.1 In a study of 10 pediatric tomatology mimics ameloblastoma, central giant cell
patients, Keszler et al2 could not establish a statistically sig- granuloma, and hemangioma.34
nificant sex distribution. This tumor is presumed to be There has been some debate about the surgical man-
agement for odontogenic fibromyxomas. Complete surgi-
cal resection is the standard approach for management of
this tumor, given the high recurrence rates after less
extensive procedures.3 However, Kansy et al6 have
argued for conservative approaches in children and
adults, except in incidences of recurrence. Because of the
aggressive nature of this tumor, a segmental mandibulec-
tomy with fibular free flap reconstruction was performed
in this case.
Although most clinically evident recurrences occur
within 2 years, in some patients, a recurrence was discov-
ered several years after surgery3; therefore, long-term fol-
low-up is recommended.

CONCLUSION
We have described a case of pediatric odontogenic
FIGURE 3. (A) Medium magnification of the mandibular mass fibromyxoma in the mandible. Although rare in the pedi-
shows a bland spindle cell proliferation in a myxoid background atric population, odontogenic fibromyxomas should be
(hematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification 3200). (B) A included as a differential diagnostic consideration when
focus of odontogenic epithelium rest surrounded by tumor cells evaluating tumors of the maxillofacial skeleton. Accurate
(hematoxylin-eosin stain, original magnification 3400).
pathologic diagnosis is critical to ensure proper
management.

HEAD & NECK—DOI 10.1002/HED JANUARY 2016 E27


HASER ET AL.

REFERENCES 19. Fenton S, Slootweg PJ, Dunnebier EA, Mourits MP. Odontogenic myxoma
in a 17-month-old child: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2003;61:
1. Slootweg PJ, Wittkampf AR. Myxoma of the jaws. An analysis of 15 cases. 734–736.
J Maxillofac Surg 1986;14:46–52. 20. Wachter BG, Steinberg MJ, Darrow DH, McGinn JD, Park AH. Odonto-
2. Keszler A, Dominguez FV, Giannunzio G. Myxoma in childhood: an anal- genic myxoma of the maxilla: a report of two pediatric cases. Int J Pediatr
ysis of 10 cases. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 1995;53:518–521. Otorhinolaryngol 2003;67:389–393.
3. Brannon RB. Central odontogenic fibroma, myxoma (odontogenic myx- 21. Rotenberg BW, Daniel SJ, Nish IA, Ngan BY, Forte V. Myxomatous
oma, fibromyxoma), and central odontogenic granular cell tumor. Oral lesions of the maxilla in children: a case series and review of management.
Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am 2004;16:359–374. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2004;68:1251–1256.
4. Harder F. Myoxomas of the jaws. Int J Oral Surg 1978;7:148–155. 22. Prasannan L, Warren L, Herzog CE, Lopez–Camarillo L, Frankel L,
5. Kaffe I, Naor H, Buchner A. Clinical and radiological features of odonto- Goepfert H. Sinonasal myxoma: a pediatric case. J Pediatr Hematol Oncol
genic myxoma of the jaws. Dentomaxillofac Radiol 1997;26:299–303. 2005;27:90–92.
6. Kansy K, Juergens P, Krol Z, et al. Odontogenic myxoma: diagnostic and 23. King TJ III, Lewis J, Orvidas L, Kademani D. Pediatric maxillary odonto-
therapeutic challenges in paediatric and adult patients–a case series and genic myxoma: a report of 2 cases and review of management. J Oral Max-
review of the literature. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2012;40:271–276. illofac Surg 2008;66:1057–1062.
7. Ghosh BC, Huvos AG, Gerold FP, Miller TR. Myxoma of the jaw bones. 24. Iatrou IA, Theologie–Lygidakis N, Leventis MD, Michail–Strantzia C.
Cancer 1973;31:237–240. Sinonasal myxoma in an infant. J Craniofac Surg 2010;21:1649–1651.
25. Singaraju S, Wanjari SP, Parwani RN. Odontogenic myxoma of the max-
8. Ataman M, Sarioglu T, Ayas K. Myxoma of the mandible. Int J Pediatr
illa: a report of a rare case and review of the literature. J Oral Maxillofac
Otorhinolaryngol 1993;27:183–186.
Pathol 2010;14:19–23.
9. Li TJ, Sun LS, Luo HY. Odontogenic myxoma: a clinicopathologic study 26. Kaymakci M, Yazici S. Odontogenic myxoma of the maxilla. Clin Pract
of 25 cases. Arch Pathol Lab Med 2006;130:1799–1806. 2011;1:e136.
10. Shahoon H, Esmaeili M, Nikhalat M, Farokhi E. Odontogenic fibromyx- 27. Rıos Y Valles–Valles D, Vera–Torres AM, Rodrıguez–Martınez HA,
oma and odontogenic cyst in an eight year old boy: three-year follow-up. Rodrıguez–Reyes AA. Periocular myxoma in a child. Case Rep Ophthal-
J Dent Res Dent Clin Dent Prospects 2009;3:103–105. mol Med 2012;2012:739094.
11. Mauro A, Lipari L, Tortorici S, Leone A, Gerbino A, Buscemi M. Expres- 28. Chen HH, Streubel SO, Durairaj VD. Odontogenic myxoma with orbital
sion of MMP-2 and MMP-9 in odontogenic myxoma in a child: report of a involvement. Ophthal Plast Reconstr Surg 2013;29:e47–e49.
clinical case. Odontology 2013;101:233–238. 29. Zainine R, Mizouni H, El Korbi A, Beltaief N, Sahtout S, Besbes G. Maxil-
12. Dutz W, Stout AP. The myxoma in childhood. Cancer 1961;14:629–635. lary bone myxoma. Eur Ann Otorhinolaryngol Head Neck Dis 2014;131:
13. Canalis RF, Smith GA, Konrad HR. Myxomas of the head and neck. Arch 257–259.
Otolaryngol 1976;102:300–305. 30. Kadlub N, Mbou VB, Leboulanger N, et al. Infant odontogenic myxoma: a
14. Harris RJ, Garrow E, Spinnato G. Myxoma of the maxilla: report of case. specific entity. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 2014;42:2082–2086.
J Oral Surg 1977;35:70–73. 31. Kleiber GM, Skapek SX, Lingen M, Reid RR. Odontogenic myxoma of the
15. James DR, Lucas VS. Maxillary myxoma in a child of 11 months. A case face: mimicry of cherubism. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2014;72:2186–2191.
report. J Craniomaxillofac Surg 1987;15:42–44. 32. Klimo P Jr, Jha T, Choudhri AF, Joyner R, Michael LM 2nd. Fibromyxoma
16. Leiberman A, Forte V, Thorner P, Crysdale W. Maxillary myxoma in chil- of the lateral skull base in a child: case report. J Neurol Surg Rep 2013;74:
dren. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 1990;18:277–284. 105–110.
17. Ang HK, Ramani P, Michaels L. Myxoma of the maxillary antrum in chil- 33. Buchner A, Odell EW. Odontogenic myxoma/fibromyxoma. Lyon, France:
dren. Histopathology 1993;23:361–365. IARC Press; 2005.
18. Brewis C, Roberts DN, Malone M, Leighton SE. Maxillary myxoma: a rare 34. Landa LE, Hedrick MH, Nepomuceno–Perez MC, Sotereanos GC. Recur-
midfacial mass in a child. Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol 2000;56:207– rent myxoma of the zygoma: a case report. J Oral Maxillofac Surg 2002;
209. 60:704–708.

E28 HEAD & NECK—DOI 10.1002/HED JANUARY 2016

You might also like