Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Title: The correlation between family socioeconomic status and child development.
Introduction
levels and educational backgrounds, and establishing whether they fall under the
poverty line.
ii) Child development: the studies include in my annotated bibliography took several
different approaches to quantifying this concept. Many focused on testing the child's
language and vocabulary skill, while others involved IQ tests, math tests, and tests
b) An important tension is how the primary research articles differed in the degree of the
i) Some found strong relationships between these two factors, while others observed
weaker correlations, or correlations that were only apparent in certain groups or under
certain conditions.
a) Income disparities are pronounced in many parts of the world, and educational systems
around the world are in need of new and compelling strategies to best educate young
children.
b) Research on this relationship could help guide pedagogical approaches to help children
Main Analysis
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT 2
a) Studies that posit a strong relationship between family socioeconomic status and child
development.
Fernald et al. 2011, Najman et al. 2004, Rowe 2008, Sohr-Preston et al. 2013.
b) Studies that found weak or no evidence for relationship between family socioeconomic
i) Influence of other factors: some studies found that children with certain advantages
(2) Factors related to socioeconomic level, like parental interaction with children and
(1) Some studies observed that socioeconomic status improved child development
(a) Children with lower socioeconomic status demonstrated faster reading growth
between kindergarten and third grade, but those gains were reversed from
Kieffer 2011.
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT 3
(2) Family income did not predict cognitive change – in fact, a child’s cognitive score
(3) Socioeconomic status strongly influences where children start in development, but
Conclusion
socioeconomic status is associated with child developmental outcomes, the nature and
i) Some found very strong associations between socioeconomic status and child
b) Most studies also agree that socioeconomic disadvantage tended to be transmitted from
a) Lack of generalizability
i) Just about all the primary studies were limited in being drawn from samples not
representative of the general population. Most samples were mostly white and middle
class.
ii) Longitudinal studies also suffered from participants dropping over time.
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT 4
Kieffer 2011, Najman et al. 2014, Raffington et al. 2018, Rowe 2008, and Sohr-
b) Lack of causality
ethical experimental manipulation when the test subjects are human children.
ii) Possible manipulations include child developmental outcomes when a new law has
i) What differences exist in the development of boys versus girls? To what extent are
these differences due to nature and nurture? How do socioeconomic factors play into
i) How does poverty affect children in a community and country that is systematically
poor?
References
Duncan, Greg J., et al. (2017). Moving Beyond Correlations in Assessing the Consequences of
gradients and child development in a very low income population: Evidence from
Hassan, R., Mills, A. S., Day, K. L., Van Lieshout, R. J., Schmidt, L. A. (2019). Relations among
Developing Four-Year-Old Children. Journal of Child and Family Studies, pp. 1-9.
Kieffer, M. J. (2011). Before and after third grade: Longitudinal evidence for the shifting role of
socioeconomic status in reading growth. Reading and Writing, 25(7), pp. 1725-1746.
Letourneau, N. L., Duffett-Leger, L., Levac, L., Watson, B., Young-Morris, C. (2013).
Najman, J. M., Aird, R., Bor, W., O’Callaghan, M., Williams, G. M., Shuttlewood, G. J. (2004).
development and emotional health. Social Science & Medicine, 58(6), pp. 1147-1158.
Raffington, L., Prindle, J. J., Shing, Y. L. (2018). Income gains predict cognitive functioning
child development and child vocabulary skill. Journal of Child Language, 35(1), pp. 185-
205.
SOCIOECONOMIC STATUS AND CHILD DEVELOPMENT 6
Sohr-Preston, S. L., Scaramella, L. V., Martin, M. J., Neppl, T. K., Ontai, L., Conger, R. (2013).
A third‐generation test of the family investment model. Child Development, 84(3), pp.
1046-1062.