You are on page 1of 6

Assignment 1

1.B 2.A 3.C 4.D 6.A 7.D 8.B 9.A 10.B 11.B 12.A 13.A 14.A 15.B

Assignment 2

1.A 2.B 3.D 4.B 5.A 6.C 7.C 8.D 9.A

Econometrics is about how we can use theory and data from economics, business, and the social
sciences, along with tools from statistics, to answer ‘‘how much’’ questions

– Data may be collected at various levels of aggregation: Micro or Macro

– Data may also represent a flow or a stock:

• Flow: measured over a period of time

• Stock: measured at a particular point in time

– Data may be quantitative or qualitative:

• Quantitative: expressed as numbers

• Qualitative: expressed as an ‘‘either-or’’ situation

– A time-series is data collected over discrete intervals of time

– The key feature of time-series data is that the same economic quantity is recorded at a
regular time interval

– A cross-section of data is collected across sample units in a particular time period

– The ‘‘sample units’’ are individual entities and may be firms, persons, households, states,
or countries

– A ‘‘panel’’ of data, also known as ‘‘longitudinal’’ data, has observations on individual micro-units
who are followed over time

– The key aspect of panel data is that we observe each micro-unit for a number of time
periods

– If we have the same number of time period observations for each micro-unit, we have a
balanced panel

– Usually the number of time series observations is small relative to the number of micro-
units, but not always


– Assumption SR (Simple Regressions)1

– The value of y, for each value of x, is:

SR2 is E(e)=0, SR3 is var(e)=var(y), SR4 is cov(ei,ej)=0

SR5 The variable x is not random, and must take at least two different values.(Otherwise, no variations.)

SR6 The values of e are normally distributed about their mean if the values of y are normally distributed,
and vice versa


var(b1 )  σ 2 
 xi2  var(b2 ) 
σ2  x 
cov(b1 , b2 )  σ 2  
 N   xi  x    x  x
2 2
   xi  x  
2
i

Gauss markov theorem

Under the assumptions SR1-SR5 of the linear regression model, the estimators b1 and b2 have the
smallest variance of all linear and unbiased estimators of b1 and b2. They are the Best Linear Unbiased
Estimators (BLUE) of b1 and b2

Central limit theorem

If assumptions SR1-SR5 hold, and if the sample size N is sufficiently large, then the least squares
estimators have a distribution that approximates the normal distributions shown in Eq. 2.17 and Eq.
2.18

An indicator variable is a binary variable that takes the values zero or one; it is used to represent a
nonquantitative characteristic, such as gender, race, or location

1 house is in Univers ity Town


UTOWN  
How to model it 0 house is in Golden Oaks

β1  β 2 if UTOWN  1
E  PRICE   
β1 if UTOWN  0

PRICE  b 1 b2UTOWN
 215.7325  61.5091UTOWN
277.2416 if UTOWN  1

215.7325 if UTOWN  0
It is also true that = c1b1 + c2b2 is the best linear unbiased estimator of λ = c1β1 + c2β2 because


E λ̂  E  c1b1  c2b2 
 c1 E  b1   c2 E  b2 
 c1β1  c2β 2
λ

Procedures of testing hypothesis

1. Determine the null and alternative hypotheses.

2. Specify the test statistic and its distribution if the null hypothesis is true.

3. Select α and determine the rejection region.

4. Calculate the sample value of the test statistic.

5. State your conclusion.

Example :

The null hypothesis is H0:β2 = 0

The alternative hypothesis is H1:β2 > 0

The test statistic is Eq. 3.7

– In this case c = 0, so t = b2/se(b2) ~ t(N – 2) if the null hypothesis is true

Select α = 0.05

– The critical value for the right-tail rejection region is the 95th percentile of the t-
distribution with N – 2 = 38 degrees of freedom, t(0.95,38) = 1.686.

– Thus we will reject the null hypothesis if the calculated value of t ≥ 1.686.

If t < 1.686, we will not reject the null hypothesis

Using the food expenditure data, we found that b2 = 10.21 with standard error se(b2) = 2.09

– The value of the test statistic is:

– Since t = 4.88 > 1.686, we reject the null hypothesis that β2 = 0 and accept the
alternative that β2 > 0
– That is, we reject the hypothesis that there is no relationship between income and food
expenditure, and conclude that there is a statistically significant positive relationship
between household income and food expenditure
Pbk  tc sebk    k  tc  tc sebk   1  

bk   k
t ~ t N 2  for k  1,2
sebk 

Thus, we might also report an interval estimate

Interval estimates incorporate both the point estimate and the standard error of the estimate, which is
a measure of the variability of the least squares estimator

When the procedure we used is applied to many random samples of data from the same population,
then 95% of all the interval estimates constructed using this procedure will contain the true parameter

2.6* Asoda vendor at Louisiana State University football games observes that more sodas
are sold the warmer the temperature at game time is. Based on 32 home games
covering five years, the vendor estimates the relationship between soda sales and
temperature to be ^y ¼ _240 þ 8x, where y ¼ the number of sodas she sells and x ¼
temperature in degrees Fahrenheit,
(a) Interpret the estimated slope and intercept. Do the estimates make sense? Why,
or why not?
(b) On a day when the temperature at game time is forecast to be 808F, predict how
many sodas the vendor will sell.
(c) Below what temperature are the predicted sales zero?
(d) Sketch a graph of the estimated regression line

2.8^ Professor E.Z. Stuff has decided that the least squares estimator is too much trouble.
Noting that two points determine a line, Dr. Stuff chooses two points from a sample of
size N and draws a line between them, calling the slope of this line the EZ estimator
of b2 in the simple regression model. Algebraically, if the two points are ðx1; y1Þ
and ðx2; y2Þ, the EZ estimation rule is
bEZ ¼ y2 _ y1
x2 _ x1
Assuming that all the assumptions of the simple regression model hold:
(a) Show that bEZ is a ‘‘linear’’ estimator.
(b) Show that bEZ is an unbiased estimator.
(c) Find the variance of bEZ.
(d) Find the probability distribution of bEZ.
(e) Convince Professor Stuff that the EZ estimator is not as good as the least squares
estimator. No proof is required here.

3.2 The general manager of an engineering firm wants to know whether a technical artist’s
experience influences the quality of his or her work. A random sample of 24 artists
is selected and their years of work experience and quality rating (as assessed by
their supervisors) recorded. Work experience (EXPER) is measured in years and
quality rating (RATING) takes a value of 1 through 7, with 7 ¼ excellent and 1 ¼
poor: The simple regression model RATING ¼ b1 þ b2EXPER þ e is proposed.
The least squares estimates of the model, and the standard errors of the estimates, are
bRATING ¼ 3:204 þ 0:076 EXPER
ðseÞ ð0:709Þ ð0:044Þ
(a) Sketch the estimated regression function. Interpret the coefficient of EXPER.
(b) Construct a 95% confidence interval for b2, the slope of the relationship between
quality rating and experience. In what are you 95% confident?
(c) Test the null hypothesis that b2 is zero against the alternative that it is not using a
two-tail test and the a ¼ 0:05 level of significance. What do you conclude?
(d) Test the null hypothesis that b2 is zero against the one-tail alternative that it is
positive at the a ¼ 0:05 level of significance. What do you conclude?
(e) For the test in part (c), the p-value is 0.0982. If we choose the probability of a
Type I error to be a ¼ 0:05; do we reject the null hypothesis, or not, just based on
an inspection of the p-value? Show, in a diagram, how this p-value is computed

3.4 Consider a simple regression in which the dependent variable MIM ¼ mean income
of males who are 18 years of age or older, in thousands of dollars. The explanatory
variable PMHS ¼ percent of males 18 or older who are high school graduates. The
data consist of 51 observations on the 50 states plus the District of Columbia. Thus
MIM andPMHS are ‘‘state averages.’’ The estimated regression, along with standard
errors and t-statistics, is
bMIM¼ ðaÞ þ 0:180PMHS
ðseÞ ð2:174Þ ðbÞ
ðtÞ ð1:257Þ ð5:754Þ
(a) What is the estimated equation intercept? Show your calculation. Sketch the
estimated regression function.

4.1* (a) Supposing that a simple regression has quantities _ðyi _ yÞ2 ¼ 631:63 and
_^e2i
¼ 182:85, find R2.
(b) Suppose that a simple regression has quantities N ¼ 20, _y2i
¼ 5930:94,
y ¼ 16:035, and SSR ¼ 666:72, find R2.
(c) Suppose that a simple regression has quantities R2 ¼ 0:7911, SST ¼ 552:36, and
N ¼ 20, find ^s2.
10
20
30
40
50

4.6 The fitted least squares line is ^yi ¼ b1 þ b2xi.


(a) Algebraically, show that the fitted line passes through the point of the means,
ðx; yÞ.
(b) Algebraically show that the average value of ^yi equals the sample average of y.
That is, show that ^y ¼ y; where ^y ¼ _^yi=N.
Ta b l e 1 Cumulative Probabilities for the Standard Normal Distribution
F(z) ¼ P(Z _ z)
z 0.00 0.01 0.02 0.03 0.04 0.05 0.06 0.07 0.08 0.09
0.0 0.5000 0.5040 0.5080 0.5120 0.5160 0.5199 0.5239 0.5279 0.5319 0.5359
0.1 0.5398 0.5438 0.5478 0.5517 0.5557 0.5596 0.5636 0.5675 0.5714 0.5753
0.2 0.5793 0.5832 0.5871 0.5910 0.5948 0.5987 0.6026 0.6064 0.6103 0.6141
0.3 0.6179 0.6217 0.6255 0.6293 0.6331 0.6368 0.6406 0.6443 0.6480 0.6517
0.4 0.6554 0.6591 0.6628 0.6664 0.6700 0.6736 0.6772 0.6808 0.6844 0.6879
0.5 0.6915 0.6950 0.6985 0.7019 0.7054 0.7088 0.7123 0.7157 0.7190 0.7224
0.6 0.7257 0.7291 0.7324 0.7357 0.7389 0.7422 0.7454 0.7486 0.7517 0.7549
0.7 0.7580 0.7611 0.7642 0.7673 0.7704 0.7734 0.7764 0.7794 0.7823 0.7852
0.8 0.7881 0.7910 0.7939 0.7967 0.7995 0.8023 0.8051 0.8078 0.8106 0.8133
0.9 0.8159 0.8186 0.8212 0.8238 0.8264 0.8289 0.8315 0.8340 0.8365 0.8389
1.0 0.8413 0.8438 0.8461 0.8485 0.8508 0.8531 0.8554 0.8577 0.8599 0.8621
1.1 0.8643 0.8665 0.8686 0.8708 0.8729 0.8749 0.8770 0.8790 0.8810 0.8830
1.2 0.8849 0.8869 0.8888 0.8907 0.8925 0.8944 0.8962 0.8980 0.8997 0.9015
1.3 0.9032 0.9049 0.9066 0.9082 0.9099 0.9115 0.9131 0.9147 0.9162 0.9177
1.4 0.9192 0.9207 0.9222 0.9236 0.9251 0.9265 0.9279 0.9292 0.9306 0.9319
1.5 0.9332 0.9345 0.9357 0.9370 0.9382 0.9394 0.9406 0.9418 0.9429 0.9441
1.6 0.9452 0.9463 0.9474 0.9484 0.9495 0.9505 0.9515 0.9525 0.9535 0.9545
1.7 0.9554 0.9564 0.9573 0.9582 0.9591 0.9599 0.9608 0.9616 0.9625 0.9633
1.8 0.9641 0.9649 0.9656 0.9664 0.9671 0.9678 0.9686 0.9693 0.9699 0.9706
1.9 0.9713 0.9719 0.9726 0.9732 0.9738 0.9744 0.9750 0.9756 0.9761 0.9767
2.0 0.9772 0.9778 0.9783 0.9788 0.9793 0.9798 0.9803 0.9808 0.9812 0.9817
2.1 0.9821 0.9826 0.9830 0.9834 0.9838 0.9842 0.9846 0.9850 0.9854 0.9857
2.2 0.9861 0.9864 0.9868 0.9871 0.9875 0.9878 0.9881 0.9884 0.9887 0.9890
2.3 0.9893 0.9896 0.9898 0.9901 0.9904 0.9906 0.9909 0.9911 0.9913 0.9916
2.4 0.9918 0.9920 0.9922 0.9925 0.9927 0.9929 0.9931 0.9932 0.9934 0.9936
2.5 0.9938 0.9940 0.9941 0.9943 0.9945 0.9946 0.9948 0.9949 0.9951 0.9952
2.6 0.9953 0.9955 0.9956 0.9957 0.9959 0.9960 0.9961 0.9962 0.9963 0.9964
2.7 0.9965 0.9966 0.9967 0.9968 0.9969 0.9970 0.9971 0.9972 0.9973 0.9974
2.8 0.9974 0.9975 0.9976 0.9977 0.9977 0.9978 0.9979 0.9979 0.9980 0.9981
2.9 0.9981 0.9982 0.9982 0.9983 0.9984 0.9984 0.9985 0.9985 0.9986 0.9986
3.0 0.9987 0.9987 0.9987 0.9988 0.9988 0.9989 0.9989 0.9989 0.9990 0.9990

You might also like