Emerson Avery Your Name Lesson Subject Area U.S. History
Specific Topic Parsing and constructing arguments concerning American
historical conflicts during the early Republic Appropriate 8.1.9.B: Compare the interpretation of historical events and Standards being sources, considering the use of fact versus opinion, multiple addressed perspectives, and cause and effect relationships
8.3.9.D: Interpret how conflict and cooperation among groups and
organizations have impacted the growth and development of the U.S.
CC.8.6.9-10.A: Write arguments focused on discipline-specific
content. Instructional At the end of this lesson the students will be able to: Objectives (Bloom 1. Discern the subject of a disagreement Level) 2. Characterize participants’ positions Minimum of three 3. Construct an argument on the subject at hand ENGAGE Modern argument: Pizza vs. burgers Activities Texts representing an argument for both sides are presented o Both of which are entertaining in their exaggerated polemics Students are responsible, in this first case, only for identifying the subject of the disagreement (Which is better: burgers or hot dogs?) and which argument each side is making EXPLORE Modern argument: PUBG vs. Fortnite Activities This time, only the text presenting a pro-PUBG argument is provided Students are responsible for inferring the other position on the basis of references in the provided text They are then to isolate and identify specific arguments in the pro-PUBG paragraph as well as offer three arguments for a pro-Fortnite side
Quality is never an accident. It is always the result of intelligent effort.
There must be a will to produce a superior thing. John Ruskin EXPLAIN Mini lecture: Activities Discussion of the fact that these arguments all turn on differing valuations of a single set of facts Except for those which are simply ad hominem attacks, which are present in both example arguments o Discussion of the fact that these arguments are valid, in the sense of potentially strong, but not legitimate: they do not address the factual basis of the argument
ELABORATE Modern argument: Cell phones in school
Activities Students are presented with an argument for having cell phones in school. They must: o identify the subject of the argument; o characterize the two sides involved; o isolate the arguments made for their presence; o and, finally, write a paragraph making the opposite argument This extends the previous activity in two regards: Most students do want to have their phones available, meaning that they must view the issue analytically rather than passionately in order to formulate their argument The argument must be in connected prose, rather than a series of bullet points Historical argument: Cabinet Battle #3 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MadmQvJezDA) Students are presented with the “arguments” offered by Jefferson and Hamilton in Lin Manuel Miranda’s “Cabinet Battle #3”, on the subject of slavery Here, both arguments are written out in connected prose already. Students are responsible for deconstruction this time: o Isolate both sides’ arguments o Indicate the shared factual basis from which they part o Write 3-5 sentences explaining which they feel is the better argument EVALUATE Historical position: Calhoun for Nullification Activities Student are confronted with their most complicated text Quality is never an accident. It is always the result of intelligent effort. There must be a will to produce a superior thing. John Ruskin yet: a primary source. Calhoun’s case for nullification, which we saw, briefly, during an earlier lesson on Andrew Jackson Using the skills learned during the lesson, students are tasked with generating a contrary case This writing will form part of the unit summative exam, given next class References Cabinet battle #3 link above Materials & Smartboard Equipment Class Chromebooks Handouts (attach) Graphic organizer: How to argue
Quality is never an accident. It is always the result of intelligent effort.
There must be a will to produce a superior thing. John Ruskin