Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Mg-Mn
Structure; Experimental; #) 75Iwa: H. Iwasaki, "Effect of Pressure on the Long-Period Struc-
*69Picl: K.M. Pickwick, W.A. Alexander, and R.H. Gamble, ture of Alloys," Proc. 4th Int. Conf. High Pressure, O. Jiro,
"Constitution of Magnesium-Indium Alloys Containing 23 to Ed., Phys. Chem. Soc. Jpn., 331-334 (1975). (Pressure;
100 Atomic % Indium," Can. J. Chem., 47, 3417-3427 (1969). Experimental)
(Equi Diagram; Experimental; #) 75Kog: M. Kogachi and K. Katda, "Stability of the Long-Period
69Pic2: K. M. Pickwick and W. A. Alexander, "Kinetics of Trans- Stacking Order in Mg3In and Mg3Inl_yCdy Alloys," J. Phys.
formations in the Solid Solution of the Magnesium-Indium Sys- Chem. Solids, 36, 501-507 (1975). (Crys Structure; Theory)
tem," J. Less-Common Met., 19, 105-112(1969). (Equi Diagram; *75Watl: Y. Watanabe, "Constitution of the Magnesium-Indium
Experimental; #) System Near the Composition of Mg3In and Phase Transition of
70Neb: H. Nebell, "Thermodynamic Properties of Liquid fl~ Phase," Acta Metall., 23, 691-696 (1975). (Equi Diagram;
Magnesium-Lead, Magnesium-Indium and Magnesium- Experimental; #)
Gallium Alloys," Rev. Roum. Chim., 15, 59-65 (1970). (Thermo; 75Wat2" Y. Watanabe, "Composition Dependence of the Long-
Experimental) Period Layer Stacking Sequence in the Structure of the Ternary
71Hit: T. Hirata, "The Order-Disorder Transformation in Mg- Alloy Mg3In]_,Cd~," J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 38(1), 141-149 (1975).
25.7 at.% In Alloy," Trans. Jpn. Inst. Met., 12, 375-377 (1971). (Crys Structure; Experimental)
(Crys Structure; Experimental) *76Fes: P. Feschotte, "Le Systeme Binaire Magnesium-Indium,"
71Kog: M. Kogachi and Y. Matuso, "Phase Changes of the Disor- J. Less Common Met., 46, 51-54 (1976) in French. (Equi Dia-
dered In-Mg and AI-Mg Alloys," J. Phys. Chem. Solids, 32, gram; Experimental; #)
2393-2401 (1971). (Crys Structure; Theory; #) 77Mos: Z. Moser and R. Castanet, "EMF and Calorimetric Mea-
72Mro: E. Mrosan, W. John, and H. Eschrig, "Calculation of surements of the Mg-In Liquid Solutions," Czech. Conf. Cal-
the Structural Energy of the Intermetallic Compound MgIn," orimetry, Inst. Inorg. Chem., Czech. Acad. Sci. Prague, A 3, 1-4
Phys. Status Solidi (b), 51 (2), 793-800 (1972). (Crys Structure; (1977). (Thermo; Experimental)
Theory) 79Kin: V.V. Kinzhibalo and I.I. Zalutskiy, "Reactions Between
73Iwa: H. Iwasaki, Y. Watanabe, and S. Ogawa, "Pressure De- Magnesium and Metals of the Gallium Subgroup," Russ. Met-
pendence of the Long-Period Stacking Sequence in Mg3In Al- all., 5, 176-181 (1979). (Crys Structure; Experimental)
loy," J. Phys. Soc. Jpn., 35, 1265 (1973). (Pressure; Experi- 79Mos: Z. Moser and R. Castanet, "EMF and Calorimetric Mea-
mental) surements on the Mg-In Liquid Solutions," Metall. Trans. B.
73Kog: M. Kogachi, "Ordering Behaviors of the fcc and bcc Phase lOB, 483-487 (1979). (Thermo; Experimental)
Alloys in the In-Mg, Li-Mg, and A1-ZnSystems," J. Phys. Chem. 80MaL D. L. Martin, "Specific Heat of Ordered Equiatomic InMg,
Solids, 14, 67-75 (1973). (Crys Structure; Theory) CuPt, and CuAuI below 30 K," Can. J. Phys., 58, 164-167
74Iwa: H. Iwasaki, Y. Watanabe, and S. Ogawa, "Pressure- (1980). (Thermo; Experimental)
Induced Change in the Long-Period Stacking Sequence of the
Closed-Packed Layers in Mg3In." J. Appl. Crystallogr., 7, *Indicates key paper.
611-615 (1974). (Pressure; Experimental) #Indicates presence of a phase diagram.
In-Mgevaluation contributedby A. A. Nayeb-Hashemi and J. B. Clark, DepartmentofMetallurgicalEngineering,The University of Missouri-Rolla,Rolla,
MO, 65401, U.S.A. This work was supportedby AmericanSocietyfor Metals. Literature searched through 1984.Professor Clark is ASM/NBSData Program
Category Editor for binary magnesium alloys.
800
L + (flMn)
7OO 700~
0
~oOc ~ c ~ 0 . 9 9 e 653Oc L + (aMn)
"~ 600
q9
E
500-
400 -
300
0.5 1 1.5 2 ~5
M Atomic Percent Manganese
Weight P e r c e n t I~,lan~anese
2 3 4 5 6
900 ..~h I
800
L ~
~ o 9 E
• o
I O
700 ~ ~o
~5o~ ~,~ ~R L + (aMn)
o []
~ (Mg) j * ~ I 0 43Gro /
E- / - I * "~v" /
5oo ~7~ I • ~i~ /
0 ] v 57Pet i
300|~ . . . . . t . . . . r . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . ~ . . . . . . . . .
Table4 Mg-Mn Lattice Parameter Data from below the peritectic t e m p e r a t u r e (see Table 4).
[31Schl] (see also [31Sch2]) determined the lattice pa-
Homogeneity(a), Lattice parameters, nm rameters of several (Mg) alloys at room temperature.
Phase at.% Mn a c Reference
The alloys were prepared from 99.95% pure Mg. How-
(Mg) . . . . . . . . . . 0 0.32093 0.52107(b) [King1] ever, [Shunk] disputed the purity of the alloys (see
0.44 0.32045 0.52053(c) [50Bus] "Solid Solubility").
1.1 0.32038 0.52045(d) [31Sch2]
0 0.32072 0.52110(e) [63Var] [63Var] m e a s u r e d the lattice p a r a m e t e r s of super-
0.53 0.32056 0.52078 saturated Mg solid solutions. The alloys were quenched
1.17 0.32037 0.52041 from the liquid state at a rate of about 50 000 ~ [63Var]
1.53 0.32026 0.52020 reported that these metastable supersaturated solid solu-
2.04 0.32010 0.51979 tions decomposed when annealed at 250 to 350 ~ (see
2.46 0.31997 0.51969
(aMn) . . . . . . . . . 100 0.89219(b) ... [Kingl] Table 4).
(~Mn) . . . . . . . . . 100 0.63152 ..- [King2]
(TMn) . . . . . . . . . 100 0.38624 ... [King2] (Mn). Mn has four allotropic structures: ~Mn, ~Mn, ~/Mn,
(SMn) . . . . . . . . . 100 0.30806 ... [King2] and 8Mn. All of these forms are cubic, with A12-, A13-,
AI-, and A2-type structure, respectively (see Table 3).
(a)From the phase diagram. (b)Lattice parameters given at
25 ~ (c) Lattice parameters given at 25 ~ for the sample quenched [35Saw] reported a compound of Mg-Mn. However, this
from below peritectic temperature. (d)Lattice parameters given at was not confirmed by the X-ray analyses of [35Bakl],
room temperature for the sample quenched from 600 ~ (e)Lattice
parameters given at room temperature for the samples quenched from [35Bak2], and [50Sch].
melt. The lattice parameters were measured in supersaturated solid solu-
tions. [Pearson2]misread the compositionunit for Mn.
Cited References
2 7 R u h : J. Ruhrmann, "Magnesium-Manganese Alloys," quoted
There is no general agreement as to the identity of the as private communication by W. Schmidt, Z. Metallkd., 19(11),
phase in equilibrium with the (Mg) solid solution. 455 (1927) in German. (Equi Diagram; Experimental; #)
[35Bakl], [46Now], and [64Dri], from their X-ray analysis, 29Bak: H.E. Bakken and R. T. Wood,American Society for Steel
Treating Handbook, The ASM for Steel Treating, Cleveland,
showed that the phase in equilibrium with (Mg) is (flMn), OH (1929). (Equi Diagram; Review)
but the X-ray analysis of [46Hei, 50Sch, 66Del, 73Muk] 2 9 G a n : J.A. Gann, "Treatment and Structure of Magnesium Al-
and the electron diffraction study of [46Hei] showed that loys," Trans. Met. Soc. AIME, 83, 309-332 (1929). (Equi Dia-
the phase in equilibrium with (Mg) is (aMn). [59Dri], in gram; Review)
their X-ray analysis of the particles extracted electro- 3 0 P e a : G.W. Pearson, "Magnesium-Manganese Alloys," Ind.
lytically from Mg-0.67 at.% Mn, found mixtures of aMn Eng. Chem., 22(4), 367-370 (1930). (Equi Diagram; Experi-
and flMn. The results of [73Muk] suggested that Fe con- mental)
tamination promoted formation of (flMn). Because, at tem- 3 1 M a n : W. Mannehen, "Heat Conductivity, Electric Conduc-
peratures below 700 ~ aMn is more stable than flMn, the tivity and Lawrence Number of Light Alloys," Z. Metallkd., 23,
193-196 (1931) in German. (Thermo; Experimental)
aMn is the phase in equilibrium with (Mg), as shown in 31Schl: E. Schmid, ~'Contribution to the Physics and Metal-
Fig. 1. [Hansen], [59Ray], [60Rob], [80Bra], and [Metals lography of Magnesium," Z. Elektrochem., 37(8/9), 447-459
Handbook] showed in their assessments (aMn) as the (1931) in German. (Crys Structure; Experimental; #)
phase in equilibrium with (Mg). 31Sch2: E. Schmid and G. Siebel, "Determination of Solid Solu-
bility of Mn in Mg by X-ray Analysis," Metallwirtschaft, 10(49),
The extent of solubility of Mg in (Mn) has not been estab- 923-925 (1931) in German. (Equi Diagram; Experimental; #)
lished. [45Tin] estimated it to be 42.97 at.% Mg, whereas 35Bakl: E.F. Bakhmetev and I. M. Golovchinev, "DoesThere Ex-
[50Sch] suggested it to be less than 2.23 at.% Mg. [59Dri], ist a Homogeneous Intermetallic Phase in the Magnesium-
by X-ray analysis of (Mn) particles extracted from a Mg- Manganese System," Acta Physicochim. U.R.S.S., 2, 571-574
0.67 at.% Mn alloy, showed that the solid solubility of Mg (1935). (Crys Structure; Experimental)
in (Mn) is negligible, because the particles were almost 35Bak2: E.F. Bakhmetev and J. M. Golovchinev, "Is an Interme-
pure Mn. tallic Homogeneous Phase Formed in the System Magnesium-
Manganese," Zh. Fiz. Khim., 6(5), 597-600 (1935). (Crys
Structure; Experimental)
Crystal Structure and Lattice Parameters 35Saw: H. Sawamoto, "Equilibrium Diagram of Magnesium-
Rich Magnesium-Manganese Binary System," Suiyokwai-Shi,
(Mg). The (Mg) phase has the hexagonal, A3-type struc- 8, 763-768 (1935) in Japanese. (Equi Diagram; Experimen-
ture (see Table 3). [50Bus] determined the lattice parame- tal; #)
ters of (Mg) at 25 ~ containing 0.44 at.% Mn, quenched 37Got: M. Goto, M. Nito, and H. Asada, "Einige Eigenschaften