Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Original paper
Keywords: Growth mechanism; atomic force microscopy; soap-free emulsion polymerization; poly
methylmethacrylate particle.
1. INTRODUCTION
Table 1.
Experimental conditions of the polymerization of methylmethacrylate
2. EXPERIMENTAL
2.1. Material
Methylmethacrylate (Tokyo Chemical Industry) and 2,2 -azobis(2-methylpropion-
amidine) dihydrochloride (Wako Pure Chemical), which is called V-50, were
used as monomer and radical initiator, respectively, without further purification.
This cationic initiator is employed to make all the synthesized polymers charged
positively, so that they are able to adsorb electrostatically on the negatively charged
mica surface when they are sampled. Pure water used here was purified as
follows. After the water was distilled and deionized by a distillation apparatus
(WGA-28; Yamato Scientific), it was further purified by a Milli-Q purification
system (Millipore). Finally, nitrogen gas was bubbled into the water for at least
2 h to remove the dissolved oxygen.
2.2. Polymerization
The soap-free emulsion polymerization of methylmethacrylate was performed in a
round-bottom reactor of 500 ml with four necks for stirring mechanically with a
Teflon turbine blade, condensing the reflux with cold water, purging with nitrogen
gas and sampling an aliquot of the solution with a pipet. The temperature of the
reactor was controlled by a water bath with a precision of ±0.1◦ C. The experimental
conditions of polymerization employed are shown in Table 1.
Polymerization experiments were carried out as follows. First, a given amount of
pure water was poured into the reactor under nitrogen atmosphere and heated to a
given temperature, agitating with an impeller speed of 185 r.p.m. Methylmethacry-
late monomer was added after the temperature and agitation were settled. Finally,
an aqueous solution of V-50 was added to start the polymerization.
Growth processes of PMMA by AFM 569
The size of particles was measured mainly by field emission (FE)-SEM (JSM-
6340FS; JEOL). SEM samples were prepared as follows. A small amount of
solution was sampled from the reactor at a given time and then a drop of the solution
was placed on the freshly cleaved mica plate. The excessive reactants and particles
in the drop were removed by rinsing with pure water. Then, the specimen was
freeze-dried following the usual procedure and coated with a thin gold film by the
chemical vapor deposition method. The particle size was determined by averaging
the data of around 200 particles.
2.4. AFM
Figure 2. SEM images of the PMMA particles at m = 28.3 g and various initiator concentrations:
(a and a ) w = 0.034, (b) 0.186 and (c) 0.305 g.
Figure 3. Growth curves of the particles at m = 14.2 g and various initiator concentrations.
572 T. Yamamoto and K. Higashitani
Figure 4. Changes of SEM images of the PMMA particles at m = 14.2 g and w = 0.034 g with
reaction time: (a) tr = 5, (b) 10, (c) 15, (d) 25, (e) 60 and (f) 120 min. The arrows indicate the
polymeric materials on the mica surface.
SEM images of the PMMA particles at w = 0.034 g and tr 120 min are
shown in Fig. 4. At tr = 5 and 10 min, monodisperse particles are formed, as
shown in Fig. 4(a and b). In Fig. 4(c and d), the color contrasts of the particles
at tr = 15 and 25 min may be classified into two types: most particles with
dark gray color and some particles with bright gray color, which indicates that the
former particles are flattened on the substrate probably because they are swollen
by absorbing monomers and extremely soft [8]. To examine whether the features
estimated above are appropriate or not, the force curves between the cantilever tip
and the particles were measured using the force-mode procedure.
Growth processes of PMMA by AFM 573
Figure 5. Changes of force curves between a probe tip and a particle top with reaction time: (a) tr = 5,
(b) 10, (c) 15, (d) 25, (e) 60 and (f) 120 min.
Figure 5 shows the approaching and separating force curves for the particles at
tr = 5, 10, 15, 25, 60 and 120 min. The following features are clarified. As for
Fig. 5(a and b), the approaching force curves at tr = 5 and 10 min become repulsive
at a small separation. Also, the approaching force curves at tr = 15 and 25 min
become repulsive at a larger separation, as shown in Fig. 5(c and d). These features
are typically found in force curves between a hard material, such as a cantilever tip,
and a soft domain, such as bubbles and an immiscible liquid drop [10, 11]. On the
574 T. Yamamoto and K. Higashitani
other hand, Fig. 5(e and f) shows that both the approaching and separating force
curves are always repulsive and short-ranged at smaller separations. This indicates
that the particles here are much more solid-like than the particles at tr = 15 and
25 min. It is found that the rigidity of the PMMA particles changes from soft to
hard with the reaction time, which is consistent with the estimation for the SEM
observations.
The growth of particles at tr 25 min is considered to be attributable mainly to
particle swelling by absorbing monomers from the bulk. The growth at tr 25 min
is due to the deposition of the polymeric materials, as the white arrows indicate in
Fig. 4(d), in the bulk on the particle surface and their simultaneous swelling by
monomers in the bulk. Then, the particles are composed of the core solidified by
their polymerization. In the present study, the nucleation process is not discussed
and the details are given elsewhere [4, 8]. Comparing the growth processes of
PMMA particles at m = 28.3 and 14.2 g with those of the polystyrene particles
in our previous research [5, 6], no remarkable difference is found.
Figure 6. SEM images of the particles at m = 2.83 g and various initiator concentrations:
(a) w = 0.0006, (b) 0.003 and (c) 0.034 g.
Growth processes of PMMA by AFM 575
Figure 7. AFM height images of the surrounding area of the final particles at m = 2.83 g and various
initiator concentrations: (a) w = 0.0006, (b) 0.003 and (c) 0.034 g. This figure is published in color
on http://www.ingenta.com
576 T. Yamamoto and K. Higashitani
Figure 8. Schematic drawing for the possible processes of the growth of PMMA particles in soap-free
emulsion polymerization. This figure is published in color on http://www.ingenta.com
when the monomer conversion reaches 1.0; in other words, the deposition of the
polymeric materials in the bulk on the particle surface is least likely to occur at
low monomer concentration. Hence, the final particle size becomes smaller as the
initiator concentration increases.
The above discussion is summarized to procedure a schematic representation
about the growth process of PMMA particle, as shown in Fig. 8.
4. CONCLUSIONS
The following conclusions are drawn for the PMMA particles prepared by soap-
free emulsion polymerization according to the experimental conditions as shown in
Table 1 from the molecular-scale observations using SEM and AFM.
(i) At high monomer concentrations, such as the experimental conditions of m =
28.3 and 14.2 g in Table 1, as the initiator concentration increases, the final
particle size increases. The reason is because the polymeric materials are
generated in the bulk continuously and contribute to the growth process. This
growth mechanism is the same as that of the polystyrene particle [6].
(ii) At low monomer concentrations, such as the experimental condition of m =
2.83 g in Table 1, as the initiator concentration increases, the final particle
Growth processes of PMMA by AFM 577
size decreases. The polymeric materials are not born in the bulk continuously
because of the small amount of monomers. Hence, an increase of the initiator
concentration does not enable the particles to grow. The growth processes are
explained by the LaMer diagram.
REFERENCES
1. W. D. Harkins, A general theory of the mechanism of emulsion polymerization, J. Am. Chem.
Soc. 69, 1428–1444 (1947).
2. W. V. Smith and R. W. Ewart, Kinetics of emulsion polymerization, J. Chem. Phys. 16, 592–599
(1948).
3. M. Arai, K. Arai and S. Saito, Polymer particle formation in soapless emulsion polymerization,
J. Polym. Sci., Polym. Chem. Ed. 17, 3655–3665 (1979).
4. T. Yamamoto, Y. Kanda and K. Higashitani, Molecular-scale observation of formation of nuclei
in soap-free polymerization of styrene, Langmuir 20, 4400–4405 (2004).
5. T. Yamamoto, T. Fukushima, Y. Kanda and K. Higashitani, Molecular-scale observation of the
surface of polystyrene particles by AFM, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 292, 392–396 (2005).
6. T. Yamamoto, M. Nakayama, Y. Kanda and K. Higashitani, Growth mechanism of soap-free
polymerization of styrene investigated by AFM, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 297, 112–121 (2006).
7. T. Yamamoto, Y. Kanda and K. Higashitani, Initial growth process of polystyrene particle
investigated by AFM, J. Colloid Interface Sci. 299, 493–496 (2006).
8. T. Yamamoto, Y. Kanda and K. Higashitani, Nucleation and growth process of polystyrene
particle investigated by AFM, J. Chem. Eng. Jpn. 39, 596–603 (2006).
9. A. L. Weisenhorn, P. K. Hansma, T. R. Albrecht and C. F. Quate, Forces in atomic force
microscopy in air and water, Appl. Phys. Lett. 54, 2651–2653 (1989).
10. M. Preuss and H.-J. Butt, Direct measurement of particle-bubble interactions in aqueous
electrolyte: dependence on surfactant, Langmuir 14, 3164–3174 (1998).
11. M. Sakamoto, Y. Kanda, M. Miyahara and K. Higashitani, Origin of long-range attractive force
between surfaces hydrophobized by surfactant adsorption, Langmuir 18, 5713–5719 (2002).
12. V. K. LaMer and R. H. Dinegar, Theory, production and mechanism of formation of monodis-
persed hydrosols, J. Am. Chem. Soc. 72, 4847–4854 (1950).