Queen's Israel on campus censures Rector for disrespectful remarks. Rector abused his position, misquoted and misconstrued facts about Israel. Day's remarks detracted from solemnity and purpose of day.
Original Description:
Original Title
Queen’s Israel on Campus Statement re: Nick Day's Remembrance Day Remarks
Queen's Israel on campus censures Rector for disrespectful remarks. Rector abused his position, misquoted and misconstrued facts about Israel. Day's remarks detracted from solemnity and purpose of day.
Queen's Israel on campus censures Rector for disrespectful remarks. Rector abused his position, misquoted and misconstrued facts about Israel. Day's remarks detracted from solemnity and purpose of day.
Israel
on
Campus
Statement
re:
Nick
Day’s
Remembrance
Day
Remarks
I,
Mitchell
Rattner,
President
of
Queen’s
Israel
on
Campus,
speak
on
behalf
of
myself,
my
co-‐President,
Jacob
Martin,
and
our
executive
committee,
when
I
congratulate
Craig
Draeger,
a
member-‐at-‐large
of
the
Queen’s
Alma
Mater
Society
(AMS)
who
in
the
AMS
General
Assembly
meeting
of
November
11,
2010
put
forward
the
motion
that
the
‘AMS
Assembly,
in
order
to
preserve
the
political
neutrality
of
Remembrance
Day,
formally
censure
Rector
Nick
Day
for
his
disrespectful
comment
at
the
Remembrance
Day
ceremony
in
Grant
Hall
on
Nov.
11
2010.’
I
also
congratulate
the
AMS
on
passing
this
motion,
thus
formally
censuring
Nick
Day
for
his
blatant
lack
of
discretion
in
crafting
his
Remembrance
Day
remarks.
(A
full
transcript
of
his
speech
is
available
at
http://dl.dropbox.com/u/258629/Rector%20Remembrance%20Day.pdf.)
We
support
this
censure
of
Nick
Day
for
the
following
reasons.
First,
he
abused
his
position
and
the
podium.
Instead
of
adhering
to
the
decorum
and
spirit
of
Remembrance
Day
and
paying
tribute
to
our
Canadian
soldiers,
past
and
present,
who
have
served
and
died
for
our
country,
he
used
this
opportunity
to
argue
his
opinions
on
a
range
of
controversial
political
topics.
Second,
he
blatantly
misquoted
and
misconstrued
facts
about
Israel,
its
policies
and
its
history
in
order
to
provoke
anti-‐Israel
sentiment.
We
are
offended
by
his
glaring
deviation
from
the
traditional
ethos
of
Remembrance
Day.
Remembrance
Day
is
a
time
to
be
proud
of
being
Canadian,
to
embrace
our
heritage,
and
pay
tribute
to
our
soldiers.
His
words
detracted
from
the
solemnity
and
purpose
of
the
day.
Given
his
position
as
Rector
of
the
university
which
places
him
in
the
position
of
being
the
students’
representative
to
the
administration,
and
given
that
he
was
asked
to
speak
in
this
capacity
by
Rev.
Brian
Yealland,
Chaplain
of
Queen’s
University,
we
are
shocked
by
Nick
Day’s
lack
of
judgment,
sense
of
his
position,
and
overall
sensitivity
to
his
constituents.
He
alienated
and
offended
a
large
contingent
of
those
he
is
supposed
to
represent.
Additionally,
we,
the
IOC
executive,
support
the
censure
because
part
of
our
responsibility
is
to
advocate
for
accuracy
when
it
comes
to
issues
related
to
Israel.
To
quote
Nick
Day’s
speech:
“He
[Mr
Day’s
grandfather]
would
have
been
dismayed
by
the
following
order,
issued
by
the
Israeli
Defense
Force’s
central
command
to
its
soldiers:
‘when
our
forces
encounter
civilians
during
the
war
or
in
a
raid,
the
encountered
civilians
may,
and
even
must,
be
killed.
Under
no
circumstances
should
an
Arab
be
trusted,
even
if
he
gives
the
impression
of
being
civilized.
’”
Here
is
the
original
quote,
taken
from
chapter
2,
part
ii
of
Edward
Said’s
book
The
Question
of
Palestine.
The
differences
are
in
bold
font:
“When
our
forces
encounter
civilians
during
the
war
or
in
the
course
of
a
pursuit
or
a
raid,
the
encountered
civilians
may,
and
by
Halachic
standards
even
must
be
killed,
whenever
it
cannot
be
ascertained
that
they
are
incapable
of
hitting
us
back.
Under
no
circumstances
should
an
Arab
be
trusted,
even
if
he
gives
the
impression
of
being
civilized.”
Nick
Day’s
omissions
betray
his
intent
to
condemn
Israel
and
inspire
anti-‐Israel
sentiment,
even
at
the
cost
of
false
misrepresentation.
From
Mr.
Day’s
presentation,
one
might
logically
conclude
that
this
quotation
reflects
current
official
government
policy,
but
this
is
utterly
untrue.
To
provide
accurate
context,
this
quotation
was
published
in
a
theological
pamphlet
during
the
1973
Yom
Kippur
War.
The
quote
was
originally
issued
by
Rabbi
Abraham
Avidan,
an
army
chaplain
for
the
Israel
Defense
Forces,
not
a
combat
officer
or
politician.
As
consequence,
this
quote
is
therefore
not
government
policy;
rather,
it
is
a
rabbinic
interpretation
of
wartime
Halacha
(Jewish
law).
Lastly,
following
a
condemnation
of
the
pamphlet
by
Mapam
(an
Israeli
political
party),
it
was
retracted.
Nick
Day’s
decision
not
to
provide
any
historical
background
further
emphasizes
his
desire
to
misconstrue
‘fact’.
Although
we
do
congratulate
the
AMS
on
its
decision,
the
vote
of
14
yes,
10
no,
and
11
abstentions,
indicates
that
there
is
a
need
for
greater
awareness
of
Nick
Day’s
error.
As
students
of
Queen’s
university,
we
have
lost
faith
in
the
judgement
and
the
abilities
of
our
Rector
to
represent
the
student
body
as
a
whole.
This
issue
must
be
resolved
by
the
Queen’s
community.
Mitchell
Rattner
President,
Queen’s
Israel
on
Campus
If
you
have
questions
or
comments,
please
contact
Mitchell
Rattner
or
Jacob
Martin
at
iocqueens@gmail.com
LINCOLN – Complete 7 Volume Edition: Biographies, Speeches and Debates, Civil War Telegrams, Letters, Presidential Orders & Proclamations: Including the Introduction by Theodore Roosevelt & 3 Biographies: The Every-day Life of the President, Lincoln by Carl Shurz and Abraham Lincoln by Joseph H. Choate