Biodiversity

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Some of the biodiversity of a coral reef

Rainforests are an example of biodiversity on the planet, and typically possess a great deal of species diversity. This is
the Gambia River in Senegal's Niokolo-Koba National Park.

Biodiversity is the degree of variation of life forms within a given ecosystem, biome, or an entire planet.
Biodiversity is one measure of the health ofecosystems. Life on Earth today consists of many millions of distinct
biological species. The United Nations declared the year 2010 as theInternational Year of Biodiversity.
Biodiversity is not uniform across the Earth. In terrestrial habitats, for example, tropical regions are typically rich
whereas polar regions support fewer species.

Rapid environmental changes typically cause extinctions.[1] 99.9 percent of species that have existed on Earth
are now extinct.[2] Since life began on Earth, five major mass extinctions have led to large and sudden drops in
Earthly biodiversity. The Phanerozoic eon (the last 540 million years) marked a rapid growth in biodiversity in
the Cambrian explosion—a period during which nearly every phylum of multicellular organisms first appeared.
The next 400 million years was distinguished by periodic, massive biodiversity losses classified as mass
extinction events. The Permo-Triassic Extinction, 251 million years ago was the worst, devastating life in the
sea and on land; vertebrate recovery took 30M years.[3]. The most recent, theCretaceous–Tertiary extinction
event, occurred 65 million years ago, and has attracted more attention than all others because it killed the
nonaviandinosaurs.[4]

The period since the emergence of humans has displayed an ongoing reduction in biodiversity. Named
the Holocene extinction, the reduction is caused primarily by human impacts, particularly the destruction of
plant and animal habitat. In addition, human practices have caused a loss ofgenetic diversity. Biodiversity's
impact on human health is a major international issue.[citation needed]

Contents
[hide]

• 1 Etymology

• 2 Definitions

• 3 Linking biodiversity levels

• 4 Distribution

• 5 Evolution

○ 5.1 Evolutionary diversification

• 6 Human benefits

○ 6.1 Agriculture

○ 6.2 Human health

○ 6.3 Business and Industry

○ 6.4 Other services

• 7 Leisure, cultural and aesthetic value

• 8 Number of species

• 9 Species loss rates

 • 10 Threats

○ 10.1 Habitat destruction

○ 10.2 Introduced invasive species

 10.2.1 Genetic pollution

○ 10.3 Overexploitation

○ 10.4 Hybridization, genetic pollution/erosion and

food security

○ 10.5 Climate Change

• 11 The Holocene extinction

• 12 Conservation

○ 12.1 Means

○ 12.2 Strategies

• 13 Legal status

• 14 Analytical limits

○ 14.1 Taxonomic and size bias

• 15 See also

• 16 References

• 17 Further reading

• 18 External links

○ 18.1 Documents

○ 18.2 Tools

○ 18.3 Resources

[edit]Etymology

The term was used first by wildlife scientist and conservationist Raymond F. Dasmann in the 1968 lay book A
Different Kind of Country[5] advocating conservation. The term was widely adopted only after more than a
decade, when in the 1980s it came into common usage in science and environmental policy. Use of the term
by Thomas Lovejoy, in the foreword to the book Conservation Biology,[6] introduced the term to the scientific
community. Until then the term "natural diversity" was common, introduced by The Science Division of The
Nature Conservancy in an important 1975 study, "The Preservation of Natural Diversity." By the early 1980s
TNC's Science program and its head, Robert E. Jenkins,[7] Lovejoy and other leading conservation scientists at
the time in America advocated the use of "biological diversity".

The term's contracted form biodiversity may have been coined by W.G. Rosen in 1985 while planning
the National Forum on Biological Diversity organized by the National Research Council (NRC) which was to be
held in 1986, and first appeared in a publication in 1988 when entomologist E. O. Wilson used it as the title of
the proceedings[8] of that forum.[9]

Since this period both the term and the concept have achieved widespread use among biologists,
environmentalists, political leaders, and concerned citizens. The term is sometimes used to reflect concern for
the natural environment and nature conservation. This use has coincided with the expansion of concern
over extinction observed in the last decades of the 20th century.

A similar concept in use in the United States is "natural heritage." Less scientific, it predates the others and is
more accepted by the wider audience interested in conservation. Unlike biodiversity, it includes geology and
landforms (geodiversity).

[edit]Definitions

A Sampling of fungi collected during summer 2008 in Northern Saskatchewan mixed woods, near LaRonge is an example
regarding the species diversity of fungi. In this photo, there are also leaflichens and mosses.

"Biological diversity" or "biodiversity" can have many interpretations and it is most commonly used to replace
the more clearly defined and long established terms, species diversity and species richness. Biologists most
often define biodiversity as the "totality of genes, species, and ecosystems of a region". An advantage of this
definition is that it seems to describe most circumstances and presents a unified view of the traditional three
levels at which biological variety has been identified:

 species diversity

 ecosystem diversity

 genetic diversity

But Professor Anthony Campbell at Cardiff University, UK and the Darwin Centre, Pembrokeshire, has defined
a fourth, and critical one: Molecular Diversity[10]

This multilevel conception is consistent with the early use of "biological diversity" in Washington, D.C. and
international conservation organizations in the late 1960s through 1970s, by Raymond F. Dasmann who
apparently coined the term and Thomas E. Lovejoy who introduced it to the wider conservation and science
communities. An explicit definition consistent with this interpretation was first given in a paper by Bruce A.
Wilcox commissioned by theInternational Union for the Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN)
for the 1982 World National Parks Conference in Bali[11] Wilcox's definition was "Biological diversity is the
variety of life forms...at all levels of biological systems (i.e., molecular, organismic, population, species and
ecosystem)..." Subsequently, the 1992 United Nations Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro defined "biological
diversity" as "the variability among living organisms from all sources, including, 'inter alia', terrestrial, marine,
and other aquatic ecosystems, and the ecological complexes of which they are part: this includes diversity
within species, between species and of ecosystems". This definition is used in the United Nations Convention
on Biological Diversity.

One textbook's definition is "variation of life at all levels of biological organization".[12]

[13]
For geneticists, biodiversity is the diversity of genes andorganisms. They study processes such
as mutations, gene transfer, and genome dynamics that generate evolution. Consistent with this, Wilcox also
stated "genes are the ultimate source of biological organization at all levels of biological systems..."[11]

[edit]Linking biodiversity levels

A complex relationship exists among the different diversity levels. Identifying one level of diversity in a group of
organisms does not necessarily indicate its relationship with other types of diversities. All types of diversity are
broadly linked and a numerical study investigating the link between tetrapod (terrestrial vertebrates) taxonomic
and ecological diversity shows a very close correlation between the two.[14]

[edit]Distribution
A conifer forest in the Swiss Alps (National Park).

Selection bias amongst researchers may contribute to biased empirical research for modern estimates of
biodiversity. In 1768 Rev. Gilbert Whitesuccinctly observed of his Selborne, Hampshire "all nature is so full, that
that district produces the most variety which is the most examined."[15]

Biodiversity is not evenly distributed. Flora and fauna diversity depends on climate, altitude, soils and the
presence of other species. Diversity consistently measures higher in the tropics and in other localized regions
such as Cape Floristic Province and lower in polar regions generally. In 2006 many species were formally
classified as rare or endangered or threatened species; moreover, many scientists have estimated that millions
more species are at risk which have not been formally recognized. About 40 percent of the 40,177 species
assessed using the IUCN Red Listcriteria are now listed as threatened with extinction—a total of 16,119.[16]

Even though biodiversity on land declines from the equator to the poles, this trend is unverified in aquatic
ecosystems, especially in marine ecosystems.[17] In addition, several cases demonstrate tremendous diversity
in higher latitudes.[citation needed] Generally land biodiversity is up to 25 times greater than ocean biodiversity.[18]

A biodiversity hotspot is a region with a high level of endemic species. Hotspots were first named in 1988 by
Dr. Norman Myers.[19][20] Dense human habitation tends to occur near hotspots. Most hotspots are located in
the tropics and most of them are forests.[citation needed]

Brazil's Atlantic Forest is considered one such hotspot, containing roughly 20,000 plant species, 1,350
vertebrates, and millions of insects, about half of which occur nowhere else. The island of Madagascar,
particularly the unique Madagascar dry deciduous forests and lowland rainforests, possess a high ratio
of endemism. Since the island separated from mainland Africa 65 million years ago, many species and
ecosystems have evolved independently.

Many regions of high biodiversity and/or endemism arise from specialized habitats which require unusual
adaptations, for example alpine environments in high mountains, or Northern European peatbogs.
[edit]Evolution

Main article: Evolution

Apparent marine fossil diversity during the Phanerozoic[21]

Biodiversity is the result of 3.5 billion years of evolution. The origin of life has not been definitely established by
science, however some evidence suggests that life may already have been well-established only a few
hundred million years after the formation of the Earth. Until approximately 600 million years ago, all life
consisted of archaea, bacteria, protozoans and similar single-celled organisms.

The history of biodiversity during the Phanerozoic (the last 540 million years), starts with rapid growth during
the Cambrian explosion—a period during which nearly every phylum of multicellular organisms first appeared.
Over the next 400 million years or so, global diversity showed little overall trend, but was marked by periodic,
massive losses of diversity classified as mass extinction events. The worst was the Permo-Triassic extinction,
251 million years ago. Vertebrates took 30 million years to recover from this event.[3]

The fossil record suggests that the last few million years featured the greatest biodiversity in history. However,
not all scientists support this view, since there is considerable uncertainty as to how strongly the fossil record is
biased by the greater availability and preservation of recentgeologic sections. Corrected for sampling artifacts,
modern biodiversity may not be much different from biodiversity 300 million years ago.[22]Estimates of the
present global macroscopic species diversity vary from 2 million to 100 million, with a best estimate of
somewhere near 13–14 million, the vast majority arthropods.[23] Diversity appears to increase continually in the
absence of natural selection.[24]

[edit]Evolutionary diversification
The existence of a "global carrying capacity", limiting the amount of life that can live at once, is debated, as is
the question of whether such a limit would also cap the number of species. While records of life in the sea
shows a logistic pattern of growth, life on land (insects, plants and tetrapods)shows an exponential rise in
diversity. As one author states, "Tetrapods have not yet invaded 64 per cent of potentially habitable modes,
and it could be that without human influence the ecological and taxonomic diversity of tetrapods would continue
to increase in an exponential fashion until most or all of the available ecospace is filled."[14]

On the other hand, changes through the Phanerozoic correlate much better with the hyperbolic model (widely
used in population biology, demography and macrosociology, as well as fossil biodiversity) than with
exponential and logistic models. The latter models imply that changes in diversity are guided by a first-
order positive feedback (more ancestors, more descendants) and/or a negative feedbackarising from resource
limitation. Hyperbolic model implies a second-order positive feedback. The hyperbolic pattern of the world
population growth arises from a second-order positive feedback between the population size and the rate of
technological growth.[25] The hyperbolic character of biodiversity growth can be similarly accounted for by a
feedback between diversity and community structure complexity. The similarity between the curves of
biodiversity and human population probably comes from the fact that both are derived from the interference of
the hyperbolic trend with cyclical andstochastic dynamics.[26]

Most biologists agree however that the period since human emergence is part of a new mass extinction, named
the Holocene extinction event, caused primarily by the impact humans are having on the environment.[27] It has
been argued that the present rate of extinction is sufficient to eliminate most species on the planet Earth within
100 years.[28]

New species are regularly discovered (on average between 5–10,000 new species each year, most of
them insects) and many, though discovered, are not yet classified (estimates are that nearly 90% of
all arthropods are not yet classified).[23] Most of the terrestrial diversity is found in tropical forests.

[edit]Human benefits
Summer field in Belgium (Hamois). The blue flowers are Centaurea cyanus and the red are Papaver rhoeas.

Biodiversity supports a number of natural ecosystem processes and services.[29] Some ecosystem services that
benefit society are air quality,[30] climate (e.g., CO2 sequestration), water purification, pollination, and prevention
of erosion.[30]

Since the stone age, species loss has accelerated above the prior rate, driven by human activity. The exact
rate is uncertain, but it has been estimated that species are now being lost at a rate approximately 100 times as
fast as is typical in the fossil record, or perhaps as high as 10,000 times as fast.[31] Land is being transformed
from wilderness into agricultural, mining, lumbering and urban areas for humans.

Non-material benefits include spiritual and aesthetic values, knowledge systems and the value of education.

[edit]Agriculture

See also: Agricultural biodiversity

Amazon Rainforest in Brazil.

The reservoir of genetic traits present in wild varieties and traditionally grown landraces is extremely important
in improving crop performance.[citation needed] Important crops, such as the potato, bananaand coffee, are often
derived from only a few genetic strains.[citation needed] Improvements in crop species over the last 250 years have
been largely due to harnessing genes from wild varieties and species.[citation needed] Interbreeding crops strains
with different beneficial traits has resulted in more than doubling crop production in the last 50 years as a result
of the Green Revolution.[citation needed]

Crop diversity is also necessary to help the system recover when the dominant cultivar is attacked by a disease
or predator:

 The Irish potato blight of 1846 was a major factor in the deaths of one million
people and the emigration of another million. It was the result of planting only
two potato varieties, both of which proved to be vulnerable.

 When rice grassy stunt virus struck rice fields from Indonesia to India in the
1970s, 6,273 varieties were tested for resistance.[32] Only one was resistant,
an Indian variety, and known to science only since 1966.[32] This variety
formed a hybrid with other varieties and is now widely grown.[32]

 Coffee rust attacked coffee plantations in Sri Lanka, Brazil, and Central
America in 1970. A resistant variety was found in Ethiopia.[33] Although the
diseases are themselves a form of biodiversity.

Monoculture was a contributing factor to several agricultural disasters, including the European wine industry
collapse in the late 19th century, and the US Southern Corn Leaf Blight epidemic of 1970.[34]

Higher biodiversity also limits the spread of certain diseases, because pathogens may have to adapt to infect
different species.[citation needed]

Although about 80 percent of humans' food supply comes from just 20 kinds of plants,[citation needed] humans use at
least 40,000 species.[citation needed] Many people depend on these species for their food, shelter, and clothing.[citation
needed]
Earth's surviving biodiversity provides as little-tapped resources for increasing the range of food and other
products suitable for human use, although the present extinction rate shrinks that potential.[28]

[edit]Human health
The diverse forest canopy on Barro Colorado Island, Panama, yielded this display of different fruit

Biodiversity's relevance to human health is becoming an international political issue, as scientific evidence
builds on the global health implications of biodiversity loss.[35][36][37] This issue is closely linked with the issue of
climate change,[38] as many of the anticipated health risks of climate change are associated with changes in
biodiversity (e.g. changes in populations and distribution of disease vectors, scarcity of fresh water, impacts on
agricultural biodiversity and food resources etc.) Some of the health issues influenced by biodiversity include
dietary health and nutrition security, infectious diseases, medical science and medicinal resources, social and
psychological health.[39] Biodiversity is also known to have an important role in reducing disaster risk, and in
post-disaster relief and recovery efforts.[40][41]

One of the key health issues associated with biodiversity is that of drug discovery and the availability of
medicinal resources.[42] A significant proportion of drugs are derived, directly or indirectly, from biological
sources; At least 50% of the pharmaceutical compounds on the US market are derived from compounds found
in plants, animals, and microorganisms, while about 80% of the world population depends on medicines from
nature (used in either modern or traditional medical practice) for primary healthcare.[36] Moreover, only a tiny
proportion of the total diversity of wild species has been investigated for medical potential. Through the field
of bionics, considerable advancement has occurred which would not have occurred without rich biodiversity. It
has been argued, based on evidence from market analysis and biodiversity science, that the decline in output
from the pharmaceutical sector since the mid-1980s can be attributed to a move away from natural product
exploration ("bioprospecting") in favor of genomics and synthetic chemistry; meanwhile, natural products have
a long history of supporting significant economic and health innovation.[43][44] Marine ecosystems are of
particular interest in this regard,[45] although inappropriate bioprospecting has the potential to degrade
ecosystems and increase biodiversity loss, as well as impacting the rights of the communities and states from
which the resources are taken.[46][47][48]

[edit]Business and Industry

Agriculture production, pictured is atractor and a chaser bin.

A wide range of industrial materials derive directly from biological resources. These include building materials,
fibers, dyes, rubber and oil. Further research into employing materials from other organisms is likely to improve
product cost and quality. Biodiversity is also important to the security of resources such as water quantity and
quality, timber, paper and fibre, food and medical resources.[49][50][51] As a result, biodiversity loss is increasingly
recognized as a significant risk factor in business development and a threat to long term economic
sustainability. Case studies recently compiled by the World Resources Institute demonstrate some of these
risks for specific industries.[52]

[edit]Other services
See also: Ecological effects of biodiversity
Eagle Creek, Oregon hiking

Biodiversity provides many ecosystem services that are often not readily visible. It plays a part in regulating the
chemistry of our atmosphere and water supply. Biodiversity is directly involved in water purification,
recyclingnutrients and providing fertile soils. Experiments with controlled environments have shown that
humans cannot easily build ecosystems to support human needs; for example insect pollination cannot be
mimicked, and that activity alone represents tens of billions of dollars in ecosystem services per year to
humankind.

Ecosystem stability is also positively related to biodiversity, protecting them ecosystem services from disruption
by extreme weather or human exploitation.
Polar bears on the sea ice of the Arctic Ocean, near theNorth Pole.

[edit]Leisure, cultural and aesthetic value

Many people derive value from biodiversity through leisure activities such as hiking, birdwatching or natural
history study. Biodiversity has inspired musicians, painters, sculptors, writers and other artists. Many culture
groups view themselves as an integral part of the natural world and show respect for other living organisms.

Popular activities such as gardening, fishkeeping and specimen collecting strongly depend on biodiversity. The
number of species involved in such pursuits is in the tens of thousands, though the majority do not enter
mainstream commerce.

The relationships between the original natural areas of these often exotic animals and plants and commercial
collectors, suppliers, breeders, propagators and those who promote their understanding and enjoyment are
complex and poorly understood. It seems clear, however, that the general public responds well to exposure to
rare and unusual organisms—they recognize their inherent value at some level. A family outing to the botanical
garden or zoo is as much an aesthetic and cultural experience as an educational one.

Philosophically it could be argued that biodiversity has intrinsic aesthetic and spiritual value to mankind in and
of itself. This idea can be used as a counterweight to the notion that tropical forests and other ecological realms
are only worthy of conservation because of the services they provide.

[edit]Number of species

Main article: Species

Undiscovered and discovered species

According to the Global Taxonomy Initiative[53] and the European Distributed Institute of Taxonomy,
the total number of species for some phyla may be much higher as what we know currently:

 10–30 million insects;[54] (of some 0,9 we know today [55])

  5–10 million bacteria;[56]

 1.5 million fungi;[57] (of some 0,4 million we know today [55])

 ~1 million mites[58]

 The number of microbial species is not reliably known, but the Global Ocean
Sampling Expedition dramatically increased the estimates of genetic diversity
by identifying an enormous number of new genes from near-surface plankton
samples at various marine locations, initially over the 2004-2006 period.[59] The
findings may eventually cause a significant change in the way science
defines species and other taxonomic categories.[60][61]

Due to the fact that we know but a portion of the organisms in the biosphere, we do not have a complete
understanding of the workings of our environment. To make matters worse, we are wiping out these species at
an unprecedented rate.[62] This means that even before a species has had the chance of being discovered,
studied and classified, it may already be extinct.

[edit]Species loss rates

During the last century, decreases in biodiversity have been increasingly observed. 30% of all natural species
will be extinct by 2050.[63] Of these, about one eighth of known plant species are threatened with extinction.
[64]
Some estimates put the loss at up to 140,000 species per year (based on Species-area theory) and subject
to discussion.[65] This figure indicates unsustainableecological practices, because only a small number of
species evolve each year. Almost all scientists acknowledge [64] that the rate of species loss is greater now than
at any time in human history, with extinctions occurring at rates hundreds of times higher than background
extinction rates.

[edit]Threats
Loss of old growth forest in the United States; 1620, 1850, 1920, and 1992 maps:
From William B. Greeley's, The Relation of Geography to Timber Supply, Economic Geography, 1925, vol. 1, p. 1–11.
Source of "Today" map: compiled by George Draffan from roadless area map in The Big Outside: A Descriptive Inventory of
the Big Wilderness Areas of the United States, by Dave Foreman and Howie Wolke (Harmony Books, 1992). These maps
represent only virgin forest lost. Some regrowth has occurred but not to the age, size or extent of 1620 due to population
increases and food cultivation.

Jared Diamond describes an "Evil Quartet" of habitat destruction, overkill, introduced species, and secondary
extensions.[citation needed] Edward O. Wilson prefers the acronym HIPPO, standing for Habitat destruction,Invasive
species, Pollution, Human Over Population, and Overharvesting.[66][67] The most authoritative classification in
use today is IUCN’s Classification of Direct Threats[68] which has been adopted by most major international
conservation organizations such as the US Nature Conservancy, the World Wildlife Fund, Conservation
International, and Birdlife International. The massive growth in the human population through the 20th century
has had more impact on biodiversity than any other single factor.[69] From 1950 to 2005, world population
increased from 2.5 billion to 6.5 billion.[70]

[edit]Habitat destruction
Deforestation and increased road-building in the Amazon Rainforest are a significant concern because of increased human
encroachment upon wild areas, increased resource extraction and further threats to biodiversity.

Main article: Habitat destruction

Most of the species extinctions from 1000 AD to 2000 AD are due to human activities, in particular destruction
of plant and animal habitats. Extinction is being driven by human consumption of organic resources, especially
related to tropical forest destruction.[71] While most threatened species are not food species, their biomass is
converted into human food when their habitat is transformed intopasture, cropland, and orchards.[72] It is
estimated that more than a third of biomass[73] is tied up in humans, livestock and crop species. Factors
contributing to habitat loss are: overpopulation,deforestation,[74] pollution (air pollution, water pollution, soil
contamination) and global warming or climate change.

The size of a habitat and the number of species it can support are systematically related. Physically larger
species and those living at lower latitudes or in forests or oceans are more sensitive to reduction in habitat
area.[75] Conversion to trivial standardized ecosystems (e.g., monoculturefollowing deforestation) effectively
destroys habitat for the more diverse species that preceded the conversion. In some countries lack of property
rights or access regulation to biotic resources necessarily leads to biodiversity loss (degradation costs having
to be supported by the community).[citation needed]

A 2007 study conducted by the National Science Foundation found that biodiversity and genetic diversity are
codependent—that diversity within a species is necessary to maintain diversity among species, and vice versa.
"If any one type is removed from the system, the cycle can break down, and the community becomes
dominated by a single species."[76]

At present, the most threathened ecosystems are found in fresh water, according to the Millennium Ecosystem
Assessment 2005, which was confirmed by the "Freshwater Animal Diversity Assessment", organised by
the biodiversity platform, and the French Institut de recherche pour le développement (MNHNP).[77]

[edit]Introduced invasive species

Male Lophura nycthemera (Silver Pheasant), a native of East Asia that has been introduced into parts ofEurope for
ornamental reasons.

Main articles: Introduced species and Invasive species

Barriers such as large rivers, seas, oceans, mountains and deserts encourage diversity by enabling
independent evolution on either side of the barrier. So-called "super-species" have evolved to fill many habitat
niches. Without the barriers such species would occupy those niches on a global basis, substantially reducing
diversity. Humans have helped these species circumvent these barriers, valuing them for food and other
purpose. This has occurred on a radically compressed time scale, unlike the eons that historically have been
required for a species to extend its range.

Some species introduced by humans to new areas are potentially invasive, and some are proved invasive. In
cases such as the zebra mussel, the invasion is inadvertent. In other cases, such as mongooses in Hawaii, the
introduction is deliberate but ineffective (the rats the diurnal mongoose were supposed to kill arenocturnal!). In
other cases, such as oil palms in Indonesia and Malaysia, the introduction produces substantial economic
benefits, but the benefits are accompanied by costly unintended consequences. Finally, an introduced species
may unintentionally injure a species that depends on the species it replaces. In Belgium, Prunus spinosa from
Eastern Europe leafs much sooner than its West European counterparts, disrupting the feeding habits of
the Thecla betulaebutterfly (which feeds on the leaves).Introducing new species often leaves endemic and
other local species unable to compete with the exotic species and unable to survive. The exotic organisms may
be either predators, parasites, or may simply outcompete indigenous species for nutrients, water and light.

At present, several countries have already imported so many exotic species, that the own indigenous
fauna/flora is greatly outnumbered. For example, in Belgium, only 5% of the indigenous trees remain.[78][79]

In 2004, an international team of scientists estimated that 10 percent of species would become extinct by 2050
because of global warming.[80] “We need to limit climate change or we wind up with a lot of species in trouble,
possibly extinct,” said Dr. Lee Hannah, a co-author of the paper and chief climate change biologist at the
Center for Applied Biodiversity Science at Conservation International.

[edit]Genetic pollution
Main article: Genetic pollution

Endemic species can be threatened with extinction[81] through the process of genetic pollution i.e.
uncontrolled hybridization, introgression and genetic swamping which leads to homogenization or replacement
of local genotypes as a result of either a numerical and/or fitness advantage of introduced plant or animal.
[82]
Nonnative species can hybridize and introgress either through purposeful introduction by humans or through
habitat modification, mixing previously isolated species. These phenomena can be especially detrimental
for rare species coming into contact with more abundant ones. The abundant species can interbreed with the
rare species, swamping its gene pool and creating hybrids, destroying native stock. This problem is not always
apparent from morphological(outward appearance) observations alone. Some degree of gene flowis a normal
adaptation process, and not all gene and genotype constellations can be preserved. However, hybridization
with or without introgression may, nevertheless, threaten a rare species' existence.[83][84]

[edit]Overexploitation

Main article: Overexploitation

There is a whole history of overexploitation in the form of overhunting. The overkill hypothesis explains why
the megafaunal extinctions occurred within a relatively short period of time. This can be traced with human
migration.[85] About 25% of world fisheries are now overexploited to the point where their current biomass is
less than the level that maximizes their sustainable yield.[86]

Joe Walston, director of the Wildlife Conservation Society’s Asian programs, called the illegal wildlife trade the
“single largest threat” to biodiversity in Asia.[87] The international trade of endangered species is second only to
drug trafficking.[88]

[edit]Hybridization, genetic pollution/erosion and food security

The Yecoro wheat (right) cultivar is sensitive to salinity, plants resulting from a hybrid cross with cultivar W4910 (left) show
greater tolerance to high salinity

See also: Food Security and Genetic erosion

In agriculture and animal husbandry, the green revolution popularized the use of conventional hybridization to
increase yield. Often hybridized breeds originated in developed countries and were further hybridized with local
varieties in the developing world to create high yield strains resistant to local climate and diseases. Local
governments and industry have been pushing hybridization. Formerly huge gene pools of various wild and
indigenous breeds have collapsed causing widespread genetic erosion and genetic pollution. This has resulted
in loss of genetic diversity and biodiversity as a whole.[89]

(GM organisms) have genetic material altered by genetic engineering procedures such as recombinant DNA
technology. GM crops have become a common source for genetic pollution, not only of wild varieties but also of
domesticated varieties derived from classical hybridization.[90][91][92][93][94]

Genetic erosion coupled with genetic pollution may be destroying unique genotypes, thereby creating a hidden
crisis which could result in a severe threat to our food security. Diverse genetic material could cease to exist
which would impact our ability to further hybridize food crops and livestock against more resistant diseases and
climatic changes.[89]

[edit]Climate Change
Main article: Effect of Climate Change on Plant Biodiversity

The recent phenomenon of global warming is also considered to be a major threat to global biodiversity.[citation
needed]
For example coral reefs -which are biodiversity hotspots- will be lost in 20 to 40 years if global warming
continues at the current trend.[95]

[edit]The Holocene extinction

Rates of decline in biodiversity in this sixth mass extinction match or exceed rates of loss in the five
previous mass extinction events recorded in the fossil record.[96][97][98][99][100] Loss of biodiversity results in the loss
of natural capital that supplies ecosystem goods and services. The economic value of 17 ecosystem services
for the entire biosphere (calculated in 1997) has an estimated average value of US$ 33 trillion (1012) per year.
[101]

[edit]Conservation

Main article: Conservation biology

A schematic image illustrating the relationship between biodiversity, ecosystem services, human well-being, and poverty.
[102]
The illustration shows where conservation action, strategies and plans can influence the drivers of the current
biodiversity crisis at local, regional, to global scales.

The retreat of Aletsch Glacier in the Swiss Alps (situation in 1979, 1991 and 2002), due to global warming.

Conservation biology matured in the mid-20th century as ecologists, naturalists, and other scientists began to
collectively research and address issues pertaining to global declines in biodiversity.[103][104][105] The conservation
ethic differs from the preservationist ethic, originally led by John Muir, that seeks protected areas devoid of
human exploitation or interference for profit.[104]

The conservation ethic advocates management of natural resources for the purpose of sustaining biodiversity
in species, ecosystems, the evolutionary process, and human culture and society.[96][103][105][106][107]

Conservation biology is reforming around strategic plans that include principles, guidelines, and tools for the
purpose of protecting biodiversity.[103][108][109]Conservation biology is crisis-oriented and multi-disciplinary,
including ecology, social organization, education, and other disciplines outside of biology.[103][105] Preserving
biodiversity is a global priority in strategic conservation plans that are designed to engage public policy and
concerns affecting local, regional and global scales of communities, ecosystems, and cultures.[110] Action plans
identify ways of sustaining human well-being, employing natural capital, market capital, and ecosystem
services.[111][112]

[edit]Means

Biodiversity banking involves placing a monetary value on biodiversity. One example is the Australian Native
Vegetation Management Framework. Gene banksare collections of specimens and genetic material. Some
banks intend to reintroduce banked species to the ecosystem (e.g. via tree nurseries)[113]

Exotic species removal is another approach. Exotic species that have become a pest can be identified
taxonomically (e.g. with Digital Automated Identification SYstem (DAISY), the barcode of life.[114][115] Removal is
practical only against large groups of individuals due to the econimic cost.

Reducing total pesticide use and/or more precisely targeting harmful pests is another technique.

However, these techniques are of less importance than preserving habitat and reintroducing eliminated
indigenous species. Once the preservation of the remaining native species in an area is assured, reintroduction
can be attempted. "Missing" species can be identified from databases such as the Encyclopedia of Life and
the Global Biodiversity Information Facility.

[edit]Strategies

Strategically, focusing on areas of higher potential biodiversity promises greater return on investment than
spreading conservation resources evenly or in areas of little diversity but greater interest in the conservation. A
second strategy focuses on areas that retain most of their original diversity. These are typically non-urbanized,
non-agricultural areas. Tropical areas often fit both sets of criteria, given their natively high diversity and relative
lack of development.[116]

However, many animal species are migratory, meaning that focusing only on specific locations is
insufficient. Wildlife corridors can help support migration, and is considerably cheaper and easier than
clearing/preserving entirely new areas.[citation needed]

Some habitats may require restoration before standard conservation techniques can be effective.[citation needed]

[edit]Legal status
A great deal of work is occurring to preserve the natural characteristics of Hopetoun Falls, Australia while continuing to allow
visitor access.

Biodiversity is beginning to be taken into account in political and judicial decisions:

 The relationship between law and ecosystems is very ancient and has
consequences for biodiversity. It is related to private and public property
rights. It can define protection for threatened ecosystems, but also some rights
and duties (for example, fishing and hunting rights).

 Law regarding species is more recent. It defines species that must be

protected because they may be threatened by extinction. The
U.S.Endangered Species Act is an example of an attempt to address the "law
and species" issue.

 Laws regarding gene pools are only about a century old.[citation needed] While the
genetic approach is not new (domestication, plant traditional selection
methods), progress made in the genetic field in the past 20 years has led to
tighter laws. With the new genetic engineering technologies, gene patenting,
processes patenting, and a totally new concept of genetic resources are
emerging.[117] A very hot debate today seeks to define whether the resource is
the gene, the organism, or the DNA.[citation needed]

The 1972 UNESCO World Heritage convention established that biological resources, such as plants, were
the common heritage of mankind.

New global agreements (e.g., the Convention on Biological Diversity), now give sovereign national rights
over biological resources (not property). Dynamic conservation is replacing static conservation, through the
notion of resource and innovation.
The new agreements commit countries to conserve biodiversity, develop resources for
sustainability and share the benefits resulting from their use. Under new rules, it is expected that
biodiversity-rich countries allow bioprospecting or collection of natural products, in exchange for a share of the
benefits.

Sovereignty principles can rely upon what is better known as Access and Benefit Sharing Agreements (ABAs).
The Convention on Biodiversity implies informed consent between the source country and the collector, to
establish which resource will be used and for what, and to settle on a fair agreement on benefit sharing.
Bioprospecting can become a type of biopiracy when such principles are not respected.

Uniform approval for use of biodiversity as a legal standard has not been achieved, however. Bosselman
argues that biodiversity should not be used as a legal standard, claiming that the multiple layers of scientific
uncertainty inherent in the concept of biodiversity will cause administrative waste and increase litigation without
promoting preservation goals.[118]

[edit]Analytical limits
[edit]Taxonomic and size bias
Less than 1% of all species that have been described have been studied beyond simply noting their existence.
[119]
Biodiversity researcher Sean Nee points out that the vast majority of Earth's biodiversity is microbial, and
that contemporary biodiversity physics is "firmly fixated on the visible world" (Nee uses "visible" as a synonym
for macroscopic).[120] For example, microbial life is very much more metabolically and environmentally diverse
than multicellular life (see extremophile). Nee has stated: "On the tree of life, based on analyses of small-
subunit ribosomal RNA, visible life consists of barely noticeable twigs.

The size bias is not restricted to consideration of microbes. Entomologist Nigel Stork states, "to a first
approximation, all multicellular species on Earth are insects".[121] The extinction rate insects is high and
indicative of the general trend of this great extinction period.[122][123] Moreover, there are species co-extinctions,
such as plants and beetles, where the extinction or decline in one accompanies the other.[124]

[edit]See also
Earth sciences
portal

Ecology portal

Environment
portal

Biology portal
Sustainable
Development
portal

 2010  Habitat conservation  Mutation

Biodiversi  Habitat fragmentation  National Biodiversity Network
ty
 Holistic management  Natural environment
Indicators
Partnershi  Holocene extinction  Natural landscape

p event (Ongoing mass

 Nature
extinction of species)
 2010  NatureServe
Internatio  Insect biodiversity
 Nutritional biodiversity
nal Year  International Day for
 Reconciliation ecology
of Biological Diversity
Biodiversi  rECOrd (Local Biological Records Centre)
 Intermediate Disturbance
ty  Satoyama
Hypothesis
 Adaptatio  Seedbank
 International Institute of
n
Tropical Agriculture  Sustainability
 Agroecolo
 International Treaty on Plant  Sustainable biodiversity management
gical
Genetic Resources for Food
restoration  Sustainable development
and Agriculture
 Agricultur  Sustainable forest management
 IUCN
al  Unified neutral theory of biodiversity
 LifeWatch
biodiversit
 United States environmental law
y  List of biodiversity databases
 Wild Solutions
 Amazonia  List of environmental issues
 Wildlife preserve
n forest  List of environmental topics
 World Conservation Monitoring Centre
 Applied  Living Planet Index
ecology  World Conservation Union
 Megadiverse countries
 Biocompl  World Forestry Congress
 Millennium Ecosystem
exity  World Network of Biosphere Reserves
Assessment
 Biodiversi
 Millennium Seed Bank
ty banking
Project
 Biodiversi
 Monoculture
ty hotspot
 Biodiversi  Muir web
ty
informatic
s

 Biogeogra
phy

 Bioinform
atics

 Biorisk

 BioWeb

 Canadian
Biodiversi
ty
Informatio
n Network

 Conservati
on
Biology

 Conservati
on
Commons

 Conservati
on ethic

 Conventio
n on
Biological
Diversity

 Conferenc
e of
Parties to
the
Conventio
 n on
Biological
Diversity
(Nagoya,
2010)

 Diversity
index

 Ecological
economics

 Ecological
restoration

 Extinction

 Ecology

 Ecosystem
diversity

 Ethnic
diversity

 Ewens
sampling
formula

 Forest
farming

 GBIF

 Gene pool

 Genetic
erosion

 Genetic
pollution

 Global
200

 Global
 warming

 Green
Revolutio
n
[edit]References

1. ^ Drummond, A; Strimmer, K (Jul 2001), Frequently Asked Questions About

Evolution, "Evolution Library",Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) (WGBH

Educational Foundation) 17 (7): 662–3, ISSN 1367-4803,PMID 11448888,

retrieved 2008-01-23

2. ^ "Roundtable: Mass Extinction", Evolution: a journey into where we're from

and where we're going, WGBH Educational Foundation, 2001, retrieved

2008-01-23.

3. ^ a b Sahney, S. and Benton, M.J. (2008). "Recovery from the most profound
mass extinction of all time" (PDF).Proceedings of the Royal Society:

Biological 275 (1636):

759.doi:10.1098/rspb.2007.1370. PMID 18198148.PMC 2596898.

4. ^ Bambach, R.K.; Knoll, A.H.; Wang, S.C. (December 2004),"Origination,

extinction, and mass depletions of marine diversity", Paleobiology 30 (4):

522–42, doi:10.1666/0094-8373(2004)030<0522:OEAMDO>2.0.CO;2,

retrieved 2008-01-24

5. ^ Dasmann, R. F. 1968. A Different Kind of Country. MacMillan Company,

New York. ISBN 0-02-072810-7.

6. ^ M. E. Soulé and B. A. Wilcox. 1980. Conservation Biology: An Evolutionary-

Ecological Perspective. Sinauer Associates. Sunderland, Massachusetts.

7. ^ Robert E. Jenkins

8. ^ Edward O.Wilson, editor, Frances M.Peter, associate editor,Biodiversity,

National Academy Press, March 1988 ISBN 0-309-03783-2 ; ISBN 0-309-

03739-5 (pbk.), online edition

9. ^ Global Biodiversity Assessment. UNEP, 1995, Annex 6, Glossary. ISBN 0-

521-56481-6, used as source by"Biodiversity", Glossary of terms related to

the CBD, BelgianClearing-House Mechanism. Retrieved 2006-04-26.

10. ^ Campbell, AK (2003). "Save those molecules: molecular biodiversity and
life". Journal of Applied Ecology 40 pp=193-203.

11. ^ a b Wilcox, Bruce A. 1984. In situ conservation of genetic resources:

determinants of minimum area requirements. In National Parks, Conservation

and Development, Proceedings of the World Congress on National Parks,,

J.A. McNeely and K.R. Miller, Smithsonian Institution Press, pp. 18-30.

12. ^ Kevin J. Gaston & John I. Spicer. 2004. "Biodiversity: an introduction",

Blackwell Publishing. 2nd Ed., ISBN 1-4051-1857-1(pbk.)

13. ^ [1]

14. ^ a b Sahney, S.; Benton, M.J.; Ferry, Paul (2010). "Links between global
taxonomic diversity, ecological diversity and the expansion of vertebrates on

land". Biology Letters (The Royal Society).

15. ^ White, The Natural History of Selborne, letter xx 8 October 1768.

16. ^ "Endangered Species List Expands to 16,000". Retrieved 2007-11-13.

17. ^ "Moustakas, A. & I. Karakassis. How diverse is aquatic biodiversity

research?, Aquatic Ecology, 39, 367-375"(PDF).

18. ^ Benton, M. J. (2001) Biodiversity on land and in the seaGeological

Journal, 36: 211–230. doi: 10.1002/gj.877

19. ^ Myers N. (1988), "Threatened biotas: 'hot spots' in tropical

forests", Environmentalist, 8, 187–208.

20. ^ Myers N. (1990), "The biodiversity challenge: expanded hot-spots

analysis", Environmentalist, 10, 243–256.

21. ^ Rosing, M.; Bird, D.; Sleep, N.; Bjerrum, C. (2010). "No climate paradox
under the faint early Sun". Nature 464 (7289): 744–

747. doi:10.1038/nature08955. PMID 20360739. edit

22. ^ J. Alroy, C.R. et al.2001. Effect of sampling standardization on estimates of

Phanerozonic marine diversification. Proceedings of the National Academy of

Science, USA 98: 6261–6266

23. ^ a b "Mapping the web of life". Unep.org. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

24. ^ Okasha, S. (2010). "Does diversity always grow?". Nature466:

318. doi:10.1038/466318a. edit
25. ^ See, e.g., Markov A., Korotayev A. Hyperbolic growth of marine and
continental biodiversity through the Phanerozoic and community evolution //

Journal of General Biology. Volume 69, 2008. N 3, pp. 175–194.

26. ^ Markov A., Korotayev A.Phanerozoic marine biodiversity follows a

hyperbolic trend // Palaeoworld. Volume 16, Issue 4, December 2007, Pages

311-318; Markov A., Korotayev A.Hyperbolic growth of marine and

continental biodiversity through the Phanerozoic and community evolution //

Journal of General Biology. Volume 69, 2008. N 3, pp. 175–194.

27. ^ National Survey Reveals Biodiversity Crisis American Museum of Natural

History

28. ^ a b Edward O. Wilson (2002). The Future of Life. New York: Alfred A. Knopf.

29. ^ Springerlink.com

30. ^ a b Nature.com

31. ^ Hassan, Rashid M.; Robert Scholes, Neville Ash (2006).Ecosystems and
human well-being: current state and trends : findings of the Condition and

Trends Working Group of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. Island

Press. pp. 105.ISBN 1559632283, 9781559632287.

32. ^ a b c "Rice Grassy Stunt Virus". Lumrix.net. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

33. ^ GM Wahl, BR de Saint Vincent and siddharth, Effect of chromosomal

position on amplification of transfected genes in animal cells, Nature

307:516–520

34. ^ "Southern Corn Leaf Blight". Retrieved 2007-11-13.

35. ^ Reports of the 1st and 2nd International Conferences on Health and
Biodiversity. See also: Website of the UN COHAB Initiative

36. ^ a b Chivian E. & Bernstein A. (eds), 2008. Sustaining Life: How Human
Health Depends on Biodiversity

37. ^ Corvalan C. et al., 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-being: Health

Synthesis. A report of the Millennium Ecosystem Assessment

38. ^ (2009) “Climate Change and Biological Diversity” Convention on Biological

Diversity Retrieved November 5, 2009, From http://www.cbd.int/climate/
39. ^ Fuller R.A. Irvine K.N. Devine-Wright P. Warren P.H. Gaston
K.J. ,Psychological benefits of greenspace increase with biodiversity in

Biology Letters, 2007

40. ^ "COHAB Initiative: Biodiversity and Human Health - the issues".

Cohabnet.org. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

41. ^ World Wildlife Fund (WWF): "Arguments for Protection" website[dead link]

42. ^ (2006) “Molecular Pharming” GMO Compass Retrieved November 5,

2009, GMOcompass.org

43. ^ Harvey L., 2008. Natural products in drug discovery. Drug Discovery Today

44. ^ Hawkins E.S. & Reich M.R., 1992 Japanese-originated pharmaceutical

products in the United States from 1960 to 1989: an assessment of

innovation. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 51:1-11

45. ^ Roopesh J. et al., 2008 Marine organisms: Potential Source for Drug
Discovery Current Science, Vol. 94, No. 3, 10 Feb 2008

46. ^ Bioprospecting: Effects on Environment and Development

47. ^ Home (2005-07-16). "Looking for new compounds in sea is endangering

ecosystem". Bmj.com.doi:10.1136/bmj.330.7504.1350-d. Retrieved 2009-06-

21.

48. ^ "COHAB Initiative - on Natural Products and Medicinal Resources".

Cohabnet.org. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

49. ^ IUCN, WRI, WBCSD, Earthwatch Inst. 2007 Business and Ecosystems:
Ecosystem Challenges and Business Implications

50. ^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment 2005 Ecosystems and Human Well-

being: Opportunities and Challenges for Business and Industry

51. ^ "Business and Biodiversity webpage of the U.N. Convention on Biological

Diversity". Cbd.int. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

52. ^ WRI Corporate Ecosystem Services Review. See also:Examples of

Ecosystem-Service Based Risks, Opportunities and Strategies

53. ^ Global taxonomy initiative stating that only 50 of anthropods and 5% of

protozoa are already described
54. ^ "Encyclopedia Smithsonian: Numbers of Insects". Si.edu. Retrieved 2009-
06-21.

55. ^ a b Le Monde newspaper article

56. ^ Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Census of Marine Life

(CoML) News.BBC.co.uk

57. ^ David L. Hawksworth, "The magnitude of fungal diversity: the 1•5 million
species estimate revisited" Mycological Research (2001), 105: 1422–1432

Cambridge University PressCambridge.org

58. ^ "Acari at University of Michigan Museum of Zoology Web Page".

Insects.ummz.lsa.umich.edu. 2003-11-10. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

59. ^ "Fact Sheet - Expedition Overview" (pdf). J. Craig Venter Institute.

Retrieved August, 2010.

60. ^ Mirsky, Steve (March 21, 2007). "Naturally Speaking: Finding Nature's
Treasure Trove with the Global Ocean Sampling Expedition". Scientific

American.

61. ^ [2]

62. ^ Discovery of new species and extermination at high rate

63. ^ 30% of all species lost by 2050

64. ^ a b "Reid Reversing loss of Biodiversity". Ag.arizona.edu. Retrieved 2009-

06-21.

65. ^ S.L. Pimm, G.J. Russell, J.L. Gittleman and T.M. Brooks, The Future of
Biodiversity, Science 269: 347–350 (1995)

66. ^ Jim Chen (2003). "Across the Apocalypse on Horseback: Imperfect Legal
Responses to Biodiversity Loss". The Jurisdynamics of Environmental

Protection: Change and the Pragmatic. Environmental Law Institute.

p. 197.ISBN 1585760714.

67. ^ "Hippo dilemma". Windows on the Wild: Science and Sustainabiliy. New
Africa Books. 2005. ISBN 1869283805.

68. ^ IUCN's Classification of Direct Threats

69. ^ "Population Bomb Author's Fix For Next Extinction: Educate

Women". Scientific American. August 12, 2008.
70. ^ "World Population Growth, 1950–2050". Population Reference Bureau.

71. ^ Paul Ehrlich and Anne Ehrlich, Extinction, Random House, New York
(1981) ISBN 0-394-51312-6

72. ^ Laurance WF. et al., 1999 Relationship between soils and Amazon forest
biomass: a landscape-scale study. Forest Ecology and Management.

118:127-138.

73. ^ "Astrobio paper on biomass Distribution". Astrobio.net. 2002-03-15.

Retrieved 2009-06-21.

74. ^ C.Michael Hogan. 2010. Deforestation Encyclopedia of Earth. ed.

C.Cleveland. NCSE. Washington DC

75. ^ Drakare S, Lennon J.L., Hillebrand H., 2006 The imprint of the
geographical, evolutionary and ecological context on species-area

relationships Ecology Letters 9 (2), 215–227

76. ^ "Study: Loss Of Genetic Diversity Threatens Species Diversity". Enn.com.

2007-09-26. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

77. ^ Science Connection 22 (July 2008)

78. ^ Belgium only having 5% of indiginous tree population, as stated by Kristine

Vander Mijnsbrugge

79. ^ Belgium having 5% of indiginous trees

80. ^ Brown, Paul (2004-01-08). "An unnatural disaster". The Guardian (London).
Retrieved 2009-06-21.

81. ^ Hybridization and Introgression; Extinctions; from "The evolutionary impact

of invasive species; by H. A. Mooney and E. E. Cleland" Proc Natl Acad Sci U

S A. 8 May 2001; 98(10): 5446–5451. doi:10.1073/pnas.091093398. Proc

Natl Acad Sci U S A, v.98(10); May 8, 2001, The National Academy of

Sciences. PMID 33232

82. ^ "Glossary: definitions from the following publication: Aubry, C., R. Shoal
and V. Erickson. 2005. Grass cultivars: their origins, development, and use

on national forests and grasslands in the Pacific Northwest. USDA Forest

Service. 44 pages, plus appendices.; Native Seed Network (NSN), Institute

for Applied Ecology, 563 SW Jefferson Ave, Corvallis, OR 97333, USA".

Nativeseednetwork.org. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

83. ^ Extinction by hybridization and introgression; by Judith M. Rhymer,
Department of Wildlife Ecology, University of Maine, Orono, Maine 04469,

USA; and Daniel Simberloff, Department of Biological Science, Florida State

University, Tallahassee, Florida 32306, USA; Annual Review of Ecology and

Systematics, November 1996, Vol. 27, Pages 83–109 (doi:

10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.27.1.83), JSTOR.org

84. ^ RIRDC.gov.au, Genetic Pollution from Farm Forestry using!! eucalypt

species and hybrids; A report for the RIRDC/L&WA/FWPRDC; Joint Venture

Agroforestry Program; by Brad M. Potts, Robert C. Barbour, Andrew B.

Hingston; September 2001; RIRDC Publication No 01/114; RIRDC Project No

CPF - 3A; ISBN 0-642-58336-6; ISSN 1440-6845; Australian Government,

Rural Industrial Research and Development Corporation[dead link]

85. ^ Burney, D. A.; Flannery, T. F. (July 2005). "Fifty millennia of catastrophic

extinctions after human contact". Trends in Ecology &

Evolution (Elsevier) 20 (7): 395–

401.doi:10.1016/j.tree.2005.04.022. PMID 16701402. Retrieved 2009-06-12.

[dead link]

86. ^ Grafton RQ, Kompas T and Hilborn RW (2007) "Economics of

Overexploitation Revisited" Science, 318 (5856): 1601.

87. ^ "Vietnam Raids Restaurants Selling Exotic Meats" The New York Times.
September 3, 2010

88. ^ "Will traditional Chinese medicine mean the end of the wild tiger?". San
Francisco Chronicle. November 11, 2007.

89. ^ a b “Genetic Pollution: The Great Genetic Scandal”;

90. ^ Pollan, Michael (2001-12-09). "The year in ideas: A TO Z.; Genetic

Pollution; By Michael Pollan, The New York Times, December 9, 2001". New

York Times. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

91. ^ Ellstrand, Norman C. (2003). "Dangerous Liaisons? When Cultivated Plants

Mate with Their Wild Relatives". The Johns Hopkins University

Press. Reviewed in Strauss, Steven H; DiFazio, Stephen P (2004-01-01).

"Hybrids abounding". Nature

Biotechnology (Nature.com) 22. doi:10.1038/nbt0104-29.

92. ^ Zaid, A. et al. (1999). "“Genetic pollution: Uncontrolled spread of genetic
information (frequently referring to transgenes) into the genomes of

organisms in which such genes are not present in nature.”". Fao.org.

Retrieved 2009-06-21.

93. ^ “Genetic pollution: Uncontrolled escape of genetic information (frequently

referring to products of genetic engineering) into the genomes of organisms

in the environment where those genes never existed before.” Searchable

Biotechnology Dictionary, University of Minnesota, Boku.ac.at

94. ^ "The many facets of pollution". Bologna University. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

95. ^ "Coral reefs to be destroyed in 20-40 years". Mnn.com. 2008-12-10.

Retrieved 2009-06-21.[dead link]

96. ^ a b D. B. Wake and V. T. Vredenburg (2008). "Are we in the midst of the

sixth mass extinction? A view from the world of amphibians". Proceedings of

the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 105:

11466–11473.PNAS.org

97. ^ L. P. Koh, R. R. Dunn, N. S. Sodhi, R. K. Colwell, H. C. Proctor, and V. S.

Smith. (2004). Species coextinctions and the Biodiversity Crisis. 305, 1632-

1634 [3]

98. ^ M. L. McCallum. (2007). Amphibian Decline or Extinction? Current Declines

Dwarf Background Extinction Rate. Journal of Herpetology, 41(3): 483–

491.Herpconbio.org

99. ^ J. B. C. Jackson. (2008). Ecological extinction and evolution in the brave

new ocean. PNAS 2008 105:11458-11465. [4]

100.^ R. R. Dunn. (2005). Modern Insect Extinctions, the Neglected Majority.

Conservation Biology, 19(4): 1030 -1036NCSU.edu

101.^ Costanza, R.; d'Arge, R.; de Groot, R.; Farberk, S.; Grasso, M.; Hannon,
B.; et al. (1997). "The value of the world’s ecosystem services and natural

capital.". Nature 387: 253–260.

102.^ Millennium Ecosystem Assessment (2005). Ecosystems and Human

Well-being: Biodiversity Synthesis. World Resources Institute, Washington,

DC. [5]
103.^ a b c d M. E. Soule (1986). "What is conservation biology?".BioScience,
35(11): 727-734

104.^ a b P. Davis (1996). Museums and the Natural Environment. Leicester

University Press.

105.^ a b c F. van Dyke (2008). Conservation Biology: Foundations, Concepts,

Applications, 2nd ed. Springer Verlag. pp. 478. ISBN 978-1-4020-6890-

4 (hc).

106.^ Hunter, M. L. (1996). Fundamentals of Conservation Biology. Blackwell

Science Inc., Cambridge, Massachusetts. ISBN 0-86542-371-7.

107.^ B. W. Bowen (1999). "Preserving genes, species, or ecosystems?

Healing the fractured foundations of conservation policy". Molecular Ecology,

8:S5-S10.

108.^ M. E. Soule (ed.) (1986). Conservation Biology: The science of scarcity

and diversity. Sinauer Associates Inc.

109.^ C. R. Margules & R. L. Pressey (2000). "Systematic conservation

planning". Nature, 405: 243-253.Ryerson.ca

110.^ Example: Gascon, C., Collins, J. P., Moore, R. D., Church, D. R., McKay,
J. E. and Mendelson, J. R. III (eds) (2007).Amphibian Conservation Action

Plan. IUCN/SSC Amphibian Specialist Group. Gland, Switzerland and

Cambridge, UK. 64pp. Amphibians.org, see

alsoMilleniumassesment.org, Europa.eu

111.^ G. W. Luck, G. C. Daily and P. R. Ehrlich (2003). Population diversity and

ecosystem services. 18, (7): 331-336 [6]

112.^ Millenniumassessment.org

113.^ Belgium creating 45 "seed gardens"; gene banks with intent to

reintroduction

114.^ Barcode of Life

115.^ Eradication of exotic animals (camels) in Australia

116.^ Economics of biodiversity

117.^ "Gene Patenting". Ornl.gov. Retrieved 2009-06-21.

 118.^ Fred Bosselman, A Dozen Biodiversity Puzzles, 12 N.Y.U. Environmental
Law Journal 364 (2004)

119.^ Edward O. Wilson. 2000. On the Future of Conservation Biology.

Conservation Biology, 14(1): 1-3

120.^ Nee S. (2004), "More than meets the eye",Nature, 429, 804–805.

121.^ N. E. Stork 2007. Biodiversity: world of insects. Nature 448, 657–658 (9

August 2007)

122.^ J. A. Thomas, M. G. Telfer, D. B. Roy, C. D. Preston, J. J. D. Greenwood,

J. Asher, R. Fox, R. T. Clarke, J. H. Lawton. (2004) Comparative Losses of

British Butterflies, Birds, and Plants and the Global Extinction Crisis. Science,

303(5665): 1879 - 1881 Sciencemag.org

123.^ R. R. Dunn. (2005). Modern Insect Extinctions, the Neglected Majority.

Conservation Biology, 19(4): 1030 - 1036. [R. R. Dunn. (2005). Modern Insect

Extinctions, the Neglected Majority. Conservation Biology, 19(4): 1030 -

1036]

124.^ L. P. Koh, R. R. Dunn, N. S. Sodhi, R. K. Colwell, H. C. Proctor, V. S.

Smith. (2004). Species Coextinctions and the Biodiversity Crisis. Science,

305(5690):1632-4. NCSU.edu

[edit]Further reading
 Leveque, C. & J. Mounolou (2003) Biodiversity. New York: John Wiley. ISBN
0-470-84957-6

 Margulis, L., Dolan, Delisle, K., Lyons, C. Diversity of Life: The Illustrated
Guide to the Five Kingdoms. Sudbury: Jones & Bartlett Publishers. ISBN 0-
7637-0862-3

 Alexander V. Markov, and Andrey V. Korotayev (2007) "Phanerozoic marine

biodiversity follows a hyperbolic trend" Palaeoworld 16(4): pp. 311–318.

 Moustakas, A. & I. Karakassis (in press). A geographic analysis of the

published aquatic biodiversity research in relation to the ecological footprint of
the country where the work was done. Stochastic Environmental Research
and Risk Assessment, Doi: 10.1007/s00477-008-0254-2.

 Novacek, M. J. (ed.) (2001) The Biodiversity Crisis: Losing What Counts. New
York: American Museum of Natural History Books. ISBN 1-56584-570-6
  D+C-Interview with Achim Steiner, UNEP: "Our generation's responsibility
[edit]External links
 A collection of articles from the David Suzuki Foundation on Protecting
Biodiversity

 How many species on Earth?

 ECNC-European Centre for Nature Conservation

 The WILD Foundation and CEMEX Collaborate on International Wilderness

and Biodiversity Conservation in Mexico

 COHAB Initiative: The importance of biodiversity to human health and well-

being

 NatureServe: This site serves as a portal for accessing several types of

publicly available biodiversity data

 Internet sources about biodiversity (presented for the International Year of

Biodiversity 2010 by vifabio)

 The Canine Diversity Project

 Biodiversity research in agriculture, Swiss Agricultural Research Station

Agroscope
[edit]Documents

 Biodiversity Synthesis Report (PDF) by the Millennium Ecosystem

Assessment (MA, 2005)

 Convention on Biological Diversity Text of the Convention

 Conservation International hotspot map

 Biological Diversity and Strategic Environmental Assessment

[edit]Tools

 GLOBIO, an ongoing programme to map the past, current and future impacts
of human activities on biodiversity

 World Map of Biodiversity an interactive map from the United Nations

Environment Programme World Conservation Monitoring Centre
[edit]Resources

 Automatic acoustic Monitoring and Inventorying of BIOdiversity

  Biodiversity Heritage Library - Open access digital library of taxonomic
literature.

 Biodiversity of Altai-Sayan Ecoregion.

 Biodiversity at the Open Directory Project

 Encyclopedia of Life - Documenting all species of life on earth.

 Tree of Life - Relationships & characteristics of all life on earth.

 National Biodiversity Network - NBN Gateway.

 Microdocs, Diversity.

 Economics of Species protection & Management NOAA Economics

[hide]
v•d•e
Zoos, Aquaria and Aviaries

Animal sanctuary · Animal Theme Park · Aquarium · Aviary · Bear pit · Butterfly zoo · Dolphinarium · Herpetarium · Insectarium · Natu
Types of zoos
park ·Oceanarium · Petting zoo · Reptile centre · Serpentarium · Vivarium · Zoo

Conservation Biodiversity · Endangered species · Extinction · Ex-situ conservation · In-situ conservation

Lists Aquaria · Conservation topics · Dolphinariums · Zoos · Zoo associations

Animals Amphibian · Bird · Fish · Invertebrate · Mammal · Reptile

Other topics Animals in captivity · Animal training · Behavioral enrichment · Captive breeding · Frozen zoo · Immersion exhibit · Nocturnal house · W

Categories: Biodiversity | Environmental science | Biology terminology | Habitat (ecology)

terminology | Millennium Development Goals

• New features

• Log in / create account

• Article
• Discussion
• Read
• Edit
• View history
Top of Form

Bottom of Form
• Main page
• Contents
• Featured content
• Current events
• Random article
• Donate
Interaction
• Help
• About Wikipedia
• Community portal
• Recent changes
• Contact Wikipedia
Toolbox
Print/export
Languages
• Afrikaans
• ‫العربية‬
• Azərbaycanca
• Bosanski
• Български
• Català
• Česky
• Cymraeg
• Dansk
• Deutsch
• Eesti
• Ελληνικά
• Español
• Esperanto
• Euskara
• ‫فارسی‬
• Français
• Galego
• 한국어
• िहनदी
• Hrvatski
• Bahasa Indonesia
• Íslenska
• Italiano
• ‫עברית‬
• ಕನನಡ
• Kreyòl ayisyen
• Latina
• Latviešu
• Lietuvių
• Magyar
• മലയാളം
• Malti
• मराठी
• Nederlands
• नेपाली
• 日本語
• Norsk (bokmål)
• Norsk (nynorsk)
• Novial
• Occitan
• Polski
• Português
• Română
• Русский
• Shqip
• Simple English
• Slovenščina
• Српски / Srpski
• Suomi
• Svenska
• தமிழ்
• తలుగు
• ไทย
• Türkçe
• Українська
• ‫اردو‬
• Tiếng Việt
• 中文

• This page was last modified on 15 November 2010 at 00:37.

• Text is available under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License; additional

terms may apply. See Terms of Use for details.

Wikipedia® is a registered trademark of the Wikimedia Foundation, Inc., a non-profit
organization.
• Contact us

• Privacy policy

• About Wikipedia

• Disclaimers