Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer, dr. Hilman Tadjoedin, Sp. PD, KHOM - Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine – Dharmais National Cancer Centre
Original Title
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer, dr. Hilman Tadjoedin, Sp. PD, KHOM - Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine – Dharmais National Cancer Centre
Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Early Stage Cervical Cancer, dr. Hilman Tadjoedin, Sp. PD, KHOM - Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, School of Medicine – Dharmais National Cancer Centre
Division of Hematology-Medical Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine,
School of Medicine – Dharmais National Cancer Centre
Presented at HUT – RSKD, Audiotorium RSKD, November 9th 2010
Introduction : • In the past 10 years : strategy of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (CT) → surgery +/- RT : great interest in cervical cancer (CC). • Cispatine-based CT previously untreated locally advanced CC : high response rate. • Few cases bulky early stage (IB - IIA ) : are included; long-term survival and complications are unknown due to short follow-up. Introduction :
• Sardi et al : interim analysis of a prospective (including :
sizable number of bulky stage IB). • Unfortunately the design has been criticized : 1. Criteria of bulky 2. Lack of stratification of prognostic factors 3. Using 2 or 3 modalities → concern of overtreatment • The course of PVB (cisplatin,vinblastin and bleomycin) is attractive in short recycling time → minimizing the possible accelerated repopulation of cancer cells. Percentage of total Dollars by scientific area spent on Cervical Cancer FY 2002 Cervical Cancer mortality rates by country : 1970 - 1998 • Between 1988-1991 : bulky mass CC, treated at CGMH, with PVB neoadjuvant CT. • Fifty-nine evaluable pts. : 51 (HT) vs 8 (definitive RT). • Overall clinical response : 81,4%, CR : 18,6%. • Clinical response to CT, not different by : stage, histologic type, tumor size, level of squamous cell antigen or DNA ploidy; but tumor with high DNA indices (DI) > 1,3 higher clinical response rate. • Five-year survival rate pts. with HT : 80,3%, 1 vs 8 survived; 7 pts. → poor clinical response : 2 node meta’s and 3 died; 4 pts. dettered HT for poor response died. • This study : the value of DNA flowcytometry in predicting chemosensitive. Discussion : • Confirmed preliminary results → high objective RR : 81,4% & acceptable acute toxicities. • In this series : clinical response to CT wasn’t different by : 1. stage : IB or IIA 2. histologic type : squamous / non 3. tumor size : 4-7 cm 4. level of SCC antigen 5. courses of CT 6. DNA ploidy • However : tumors with DI (DNA Index > 1,3 higher clinical RR, than with ≤ 1,3. Discussion : • Residual tumor size and grade of histological response : significantly related to clinical response, while : 1. Parametrial extension 2. Lymph node status weren’t. 3. Lymphatic permeation • Clinical estimation of residual tumor size is generally adequate, but those tumor cells in : 1. Lymphovascular space 2. Lymph node ˂CT sensitive vs primary site 3. Parametrium Discussion : • Combination CT : Cisplatin & 5-FU → applied at The Norwegian Radiumhospital for treatment of recurrent cervical carcinoma, overall RR : 49%. • Initial reports have demonstrated : short term results with surgical downstaging and improved resectability. • Median overall and DFS was not reached, actuarial 5 year survival rate : 73% vs 67%. • In our study : the number of pts. with LN (+) relatively low (bulky mass). • The occurrence of recurrent disease in the pelvis indicates that neoadjuvant CT is able to extinguish distant metastasis. Discussion : • To compare the efficacy and toxicity of NAC → HT with those RT alone with bulky early-stage CC (phase III). • DFS & OS : didn’t different significantly. • Overall clinical response (OCR) after NAC : 86,2% (24,6% CR & 61,6% PR) ; pathologic CR : 3 pts (4,6%). • Phase II : OCR → 24,2% CR & 60,6% PR; pathologic CR : 2 pts. • Hence : once NAC applied → definite surgical approach to radically remove should be undertaken as the first priority.