You are on page 1of 22

SCHOOL IMPROVEMENT PLAN

for

Middlesex Elementary
2009-2012

Approvals:
Date of Secret Ballot Election on
Results:
Which the Staff Approved Plan:

Principal’s Signature: Date:

School Improvement Chair’s


Signature: Date:

Parent’s Signature: Date:

1
Framework for Action Plan: Instructional Excellence and Alignment
2009-2012
Middlesex Elementary

Future Ready Students for the 21st Century


The guiding mission of the North Carolina State Board of Education is that every
public school student will graduate from high school, globally competitive for work
and postsecondary education and prepared for life in the 21st Century.

Goal 1: NC will produce globally competitive students.

Goal 2: NC will be led by 21st century professionals.

Goal 3: NC students will be healthy and responsible.

Goal 4: Leadership will guide innovation in NC.

2
Goal 5: NC will be governed and supported by 21st century
systems.
NRMPS Mission Statement

Nurture and educate every child,


Respect and value diversity,
Maximize learning potential,
Produce globally competitive students in a
Safe and orderly environment.

For every child, in every classroom, everyday.

NRMPS Beliefs
™ Students come first.
™ Education is hope, providing choices and expanding horizons.
™ Education is a shared responsibility among schools, families, and communities.
™ Students need high expectations for success.
™ Students learn best in a safe, nurturing environment.
™ Diversity is valued when all people are treated with dignity.
™ Learning is a life-long journey for all.

Middlesex Elementary - Vision Statement

As you walk through the doors of Middlesex Elementary, you will encounter enthusiastic self-motivated
students immersed in learning. In this safe, inspiring environment, each child’s work will reflect high

3
academic achievement while meeting his/her diverse needs. Flexibility, risk-taking, and creativity will be
evident throughout our learning environment. You will see students, staff and parents working together
to prepare for a global future.

School Team Members


Kim Kues Chairperson
Samantha Gillespie Administration Rep.
Kim Clarke Administration Rep.
Sandi Davis Exceptional Education Rep
Tina Melnyk Kindergarten Rep.
Lynn Gattis First Grade Rep.
Bettinia Zeincik-Garito Second Grade Rep.
Jennie Everett Third Grade Rep.
Mary Lacombe Fourth Grade Rep.
Kellie Glover Instructional Assistant Rep.
Ellen Brewer Special Area Rep.
Sulykeey Yebra ESL Rep.
Leigh Deans Parent Rep.
Anthony Davis Guidance Counselor

Middlesex Elementary School’s Leadership Team (which also serves as the School Improvement Team) is elected in the fall to serve
the current school year. Each academic area chooses a representation for the team. The Leadership team meets monthly, or more

4
often if needed, to assess our current status and to plan accordingly. In our assessment and reform process, we review available data
and other pertinent information. Statistics and trends from our school-community profile are noted and incorporated into our
planning. This information, along with our Title I plan, is shared during our annual PTO/Open House meeting. The data used in our
most recent assessment and reform cycle now follows.

Personnel Data

Certified Staff: Of the current staff, the majority are white (92%) and female (95%). The majority of the teachers have
fifteen plus years of experience. We currently have five mentor-trained certified staff. Advanced degrees are held by
37%, and one teacher has National Board Certification. One hundred percent of the current staff meets the highly
qualified standards of No Child Left Behind.

Additional Certified Staff Data 2008/09 2009/10 2010/11 2011/12


Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent

Mentor Trained 5 13%


Advanced Degrees 14 37%

National Board Certified 1 3%

Teacher Retention Rate 81%

Certified Data Years of Experience


0-4 years 5-10 years 11-15 years 16-25 years 26+ years

African American 0 1 0 0 1
Caucasian 7 11 0 7 10

5
Other 0 1 0 0 0

Ethnicity 2008/09 2009/10 20010/11 20011/12


Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
African American 2 5%

Caucasian 35 92%

Other 1 3%

Gender M 2 5%

F 36 95%

Classified Data (2008-2009)


Classified Staff: The number of classified personnel with two-year degrees has increased. Two of our teacher
assistants are currently enrolled in teacher education programs.

Classified Data Years of Experience


0-4 years 5-10 years 11-15 years 16-25 years 26+ years
African American 3 3
Caucasian 4 4 5 2 1
Other 1 1
Gender M 0 0 0 0 2
F 5 4 5 6 2

6
2-Year Degree 5
4-Year Degree 0

Test Data

Grades 3-5: Due to this being a year when Reading scale scores are being adjusted we are unable to report the growth
for Reading in 2007-2008. Both fourth and fifth grades have made high and expected growth in the last three years.
Fourth grade reading scores have also shown expected and high growth.

ABC’s Growth Status: 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08


(Yes or No) Expected High Growth Expected High Growth Expected High Growth
Grade
3 No No No No Na Na
Reading
4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Na Na
5 Yes No Yes No Na Na
Expected High Growth Expected High Growth Expected High Growth
Grade
3 Yes No No No Yes No
Math 4 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
5 Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes

Grades 3-8 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08


Performance Composite 79.3% 79.7% 77.7%
Grade 4 - Writing 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08
Percent Proficient 60.0% 69.0% 68.3%

7
AYP: Adequate Yearly Progress
Reading: Our subgroups have either met or surpassed the sate target goals in the last three years with the exception of
our Hispanic population in the 2007-08 test year. Our Hispanic subgroup met goals with a confidence interval.

Adequate Yearly 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08


Progress: Reading Target Percent Met Target Percent Met Target Percent Met
Goal Proficient AYP Goal Proficient AYP Goal Proficient AYP
Subgroups
All Students 76.7% 88.4% Met 76.7% 88.3% Met 43.2% 60.2% Met
American Indian 76.7% na 76.7% na 43.2% na
Asian 76.7% na 76.7% na 43.2% na
Black 76.7% 78.0% Met 76.7% 82.9% Met 43.2% na
Hispanic 76.7% na 76.7% na 43.2% 41.3% Met
Multi-Racial 76.7% na 76.7% na 43.2% na w/CI
White 76.7% 94.0% Met 76.7% 92.0% Met 43.2% 76.7%
Free/Reduced Lunch 76.7% 83.7% Met 76.7% 83.8% Met 43.2% 51.6% Met
Limited English Proficiency 76.7% na 76.7% na 43.2% na Met
Students With Disabilities 76.7% na 76.7% na 43.2% na
• = not calculated due to insufficient data (less than 40 students in the subgroup)

8
Math: During 05-06 and 06-07, all of our subgroups met the target goals with the exception of our black
population. They met with safe harbor. During the 07-08 school year, our Economically Disadvantaged
population met our math target goal with safe harbor.

Adequate Yearly Progress: 2005-06 2006-07 2007-08


Grades 3 – 5 Math
Target Percent Met AYP Target Percent Met AYP Target Percent Met AYP
Goal Proficient Goal Proficient Goal Proficient

Subgroups
All Students 65.8% 76.2% Met 65.8% 74.4% Met 77.2% 81.3% Met
American Indian 65.8% na 65.8% na 77.2% na
Asian 65.8% na 65.8% na 77.2% na
Black 65.8% 51.2% Met 65.8% 58.5% Met 77.2% na
Hispanic 65.8% na w/SH 65.8% na w/SH 77.2% 82.6 Met
Multi-Racial 65.8% na 65.8% na 77.2% na
White 65.8% 88.1% 65.8% 80.9% 77.2% 88.9% Met
Economically Disadvantaged 65.8% 71.2% Met 65.8% 67.6% Met 77.2% 76.2% Met
Limited English Proficiency 65.8% na Met 65.8% na Met 77.2% na w/SH
Students With Disabilities 65.8% na 65.8% na 77.2% na

9
Demographics
Student Data: Middlesex Elementary student population continues to grow. Our Hispanic population has grown 3%.

Student Data 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012


Ethnicity Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent Number Percent
Native American 0 0
Asian 1 .26
Hispanic 107 27.79
African Amercian 87 22.60
White 177 45.97
Multi-Racial 13 3.38
Total 385 100.00
Female 183
Male 202

Suspension Incidents:

Out of School Suspensions 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012
< 3 days 5 15 18
3-5 days 11 6 4
> 5 days
0 0 0
Long term
0 0 0
Violent Incidents 0 0 0

10
Completion Ratio

Promotion Percentages:

Student Promotion 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008 2008/2009 2009/2010 2010/2011 2011/2012


Kindergarten 96.36 95.38 92.98
1 88.57 83.58 82.35

2 98.39 91.67 94.83

3 96.77 95.16 93.75

100.00 100.00 98.41


4
100.00 98.18 98.41
5

11
School Community Profile

School Characteristics 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012


K-2 257
3-5 128
Total Enrollment – 20th Day 385

Our resource faculty and staff provide services in the following areas: art, developmentally delayed, guidance/counseling,
exceptional children, health services, media, music, physical education, computer lab, lightspan lab, speech, and talented
and gifted. The support staff that includes the custodians, child nutrition, and bus drivers/monitors all work together to
ensure that our student’s school experience is successful.

All staff members have been trained in health and safety issues addressed in the public-school setting: asbestos, blood-
borne pathogens and other biological hazards, and critical incident response. We have 3 first responders on campus that
are fully trained in CPR/First Aid/Diabetic Care. Each year, our school staff and students participate in a mock
LOCKDOWN. The critical response kit is updated yearly to reflect new personnel.

Health and Safety 2008-2009 2009-2010 2010-2011 2011-2012


School Asbestos Issues No

Blood-borne Pathogens and Other Biological Hazards No

Crisis Handbook and Staff First Responders Yes

Volunteers 2005/2006 2006/2007 2007/2008


Number of Volunteers 18 18 20
Total Volunteer Hours 264 250 275

12
School Improvement Plan for the 2009-2012 Planning Cycle

LEA: Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System School: Middlesex Elementary

School Improvement Goal:


By the end of the 2010-2011 school year NRMPS will decrease the dropout rate 20% by addressing the needs of at-risk
students to produce globally competitive students. Middlesex Elementary will decrease their number of at-risk rising 6th
graders by 3%.

Rationale:
NRMPS presently has a dropout rate of 4.63 in grades 7-12.
Our students feed into Southern Nash High School. Their drop-out rate is .05357.
In our current 08-09 5th grade class, 8 students out of 60 were not proficient in one or both parts of their 4th grade math
and reading end of grade tests.
Evidence supports that students who graduate from high school are better prepared for work, postsecondary education,
and life in the 21st Century.

Goal Established by the State Board of Education: Globally Competitive Students 21st Century Professionals
st
Healthy, Responsible Students Leadership for Innovation 21 Century Systems

Title I Components: Needs Assessment Reform Strategies Highly Qualified Staff Professional Development
Attract HQ Teachers Teachers included in Decisions Regarding Assessment Use Parental Involvement
Pre-School and Transition Activities for Children Experiencing Difficulties Coordination of Federal, State, Local Services

SACS: Planning School Climate Staff Development Curriculum & Instruction Communication

13
Resource/ Person(s)
Strategy Timeline Evaluation
Budget Responsible
Increase opportunities for over age students to 2009-2012 State and Local CO Instructional Team Progress
access the Back On Track program Funding Teachers Reports
Report Cards
EOG/EOC
Tests

Pre- Kindergarten and Kindergarten teachers 2009-2010 State and Local MaryAnn Bell Attendance
will plan and coordinate transition activities for Funding Tina Melnyk Records
rising Kindergarten and first grade students Title I Stephanie Finney Speed-Dial
and their families prior to entering K or 1st Amanda Lancaster Scores
grade. Robyn Elmore Parent contacts
Maria Raymundo Minutes

5th grade teachers and counselors will plan 2009-2010 Local Funding Anthony Davis Attendance
and coordinate transition activities for 5th grade Title I Kim Kues Records
students going to middle school (middle General Fund Melinda Lamm Minutes
school 101, band introduction, parent nights, Addie Scarboro
SNMS visits) Brenda Pace

Counselors and 4th/5th grade teachers will January 2010 Local Funding Anthony Davis Discipline
identify at risk students and establish a “buddy – June 2010 General Fund Kim Kues Referrals
list” to monitor student progress and provide Addie Scarboro EOG scores
one on one assistance as needed to address Melinda Lamm Report cards
individual academic needs and assist students Cheri Bain Buddy List
in setting academic goals. Mary Lacombe Minutes from
Flo Johnson meeting with
students.

14
School Improvement Plan for the 2009-2012 Planning Cycle

LEA: Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System School: Middlesex Elementary

School Improvement Goal:


By 2010-2011 school year 95% of teachers will use effective instructional strategies to meet the needs of all types of
learners as documented by walkthroughs and observation data in order for NRMPS to be led by 21st Century
professionals.

Rationale:
2 schools out of 28 made Adequate Yearly Progress.
Over 200 studies (What Matters Most, 1996) have said that the most significant factor in improving student learning is
with a knowledgeable and skillful teacher.

Goal Established by the State Board of Education: Globally Competitive Students 21st Century Professionals
Healthy, Responsible Students Leadership for Innovation 21st Century Systems

Title I Components: Needs Assessment Reform Strategies Highly Qualified Staff Professional Development
Attract HQ Teachers Teachers included in Decisions Regarding Assessment Use Parental Involvement
Pre-School and Transition Activities for Children Experiencing Difficulties Coordination of Federal, State, Local Services

SACS: Planning School Climate Staff Development Curriculum & Instruction Communication

15
Resource/ Person(s)
Strategy Timeline Evaluation
Budget Responsible
School leadership team members will 2009-Ongoing State and Local Samantha Deans Minutes
coordinate and facilitate PLC’s through grade Funding Kim Clarke Attendance
level collaboration and cross grade level Title I School Leadership Team Records
vertical planning sessions MES Staff Lesson Plans
Schedule
Title I Notebook
Walkthroughs
Observations
Administrators will develop and implement 2009-Ongoing State and Local Samantha Deans Evaluation
schedules for PLC’s, classroom observations Funding Kim Clarke Documents
and walkthroughs to ensure effective Grade Level Teams Lesson Plans
instructional strategies in all classrooms Observation
Schedule
PLC Minutes

Principal, assistant principals, and other 2009-2010 State and Local CO Instructional Certificate of
school leaders will complete Facilitative Funding Department Completion
Leadership program. Samantha Deans Agendas
Kim Clarke Minutes

16
School Improvement Plan for the 2009-2012 Planning Cycle

LEA: Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System School: Middlesex Elementary

School Improvement Goal:


Teachers in NRMPS (Middlesex Elementary) will improve the learning of all students by 5% on EOG and EOC
assessments using disaggregated student data to determine learning priorities, monitor progress, and sustain continuous
improvement.

Rationale:
Middlesex met AYP with safe harbor in the following areas: MATH (Economically Disadvantaged Subgroup)
Middlesex met AYP with a confidence interval in the following area: READING(Hispanic Subgroup)
Teachers use 21st Century assessment systems to inform instruction and demonstrate evidence of students’ 21st Century
knowledge, skills, performance, and dispositions.

Goal Established by the State Board of Education: Globally Competitive Students 21st Century Professionals
st
Healthy, Responsible Students Leadership for Innovation 21 Century Systems

Title I Components: Needs Assessment Reform Strategies Highly Qualified Staff Professional Development
Attract HQ Teachers Teachers included in Decisions Regarding Assessment Use Parental Involvement
Pre-School and Transition Activities for Children Experiencing Difficulties Coordination of Federal, State, Local Services

SACS: Planning School Climate Staff Development Curriculum & Instruction Communication

17
Resource/ Person(s)
Strategy Timeline Evaluation
Budget Responsible
Administrators and teachers will develop and 2009-2010 State and Local Samantha Deans ClassScape
utilize six-week benchmark assessments using Funding Kim Clarke Reports
ClassScape to drive instructional decisions Title I Nancy Burnette Lab Schedule
NCSCOS Grade Level Teams Lesson Plans
NRMPS pacing Team minutes
guides

Kindergarten through fifth grade teachers will 2009-2010 State and Local Kim Clarke – Academic PLC Minutes
analyze TPRI and DIBELS data to provide Meet bi- Funding Coach Lesson Plans
interventions and differentiation through small monthly to Title I Grade Level Teams Observations
group instruction (TPRI interventions, reading analyze data EC teams PEP’s
groups, workshop, Great Leaps, progress IEP’s
monitoring) Schedules for
intervention

Administrators, academic coach, and 3-5 August 2009- State and Local Samantha Deans PLC Minutes
teachers will disaggregate and analyze December Funding Kim Clarke – Academic Tutoring Lists
EVASS data to target students for 2010 Title I Coach Title I Notebook
differentiation. Evaas Data 3rd-5th grade teachers PEP’s
IEP’s
Evaas Data
results

18
School Improvement Plan for the 2009-2012 Planning Cycle

LEA: Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System School: Middlesex Elementary

School Improvement Goal:


By the end of 2009-2010 school year, the School Improvement Team will examine formal assessments and systems and
address three areas from the Working Conditions Survey to ensure continuous improvement.

Rationale:
Building on the schools’ core values and beliefs and developing pathways to reach expected goals, results in successful
schools and globally competitive students.

Goal Established by the State Board of Education: Globally Competitive Students 21st Century Professionals
st
Healthy, Responsible Students Leadership for Innovation 21 Century Systems

Title I Components: Needs Assessment Reform Strategies Highly Qualified Staff Professional Development
Attract HQ Teachers Teachers included in Decisions Regarding Assessment Use Parental Involvement
Pre-School and Transition Activities for Children Experiencing Difficulties Coordination of Federal, State, Local Services

SACS: Planning School Climate Staff Development Curriculum & Instruction Communication

19
Resource/ Person(s)
Strategy Timeline Evaluation
Budget Responsible
The School Improvement Team will review August 2009- State and Local SIP Team Meeting
assessment and grading practices aligned January 2010 Funding Samantha Deans Minutes
with a rigorous curriculum and high Rubrics Formal
expectations. Subject area Assessments
adoptions Teacher
Working
Conditions
Survey
Teachers will be a part of determining the September 09 State and Local MES Staff Meeting
content of in-service professional development Funding Samantha Deans Minutes
for each school year according to the grade Teacher Surveys Kim Clarke – Academic TWC Survey
level academic areas of need. Coach Professional
Development
Survey
SIP
Teachers will be included in the interview June 09 – State and Local SIP Team Interview
process in hiring new teachers. December 09 Funding Samantha Deans questions with
Kim Clarke -Academic a rating scale
Coach

20
School Improvement Plan for the 2009-2012 Planning Cycle

LEA: Nash-Rocky Mount Public School System School: Middlesex Elementary

School Improvement Goal:


Kindergarten, first and second grade classes will increase their percent of proficient students by 10% in reading
comprehension, mathematics, and writing each year.

Rationale:
Current Reading, Math and Writing scores for grades Kindergarten through Second.
G ra d e R e a d in g - T P R I M a th - 4 th Q u a r te r /S u m m a tiv e W r itin g
0 7 /0 8 K in d e rg a rte n P A -4 1 % , G K -8 8 % ,C -6 1 % 7 0 .1 0 % 5 0 .9 0 %
0 7 /0 8 F irs t G ra d e P A -6 8 % ,G K -7 8 % ,C -6 9 % 6 9 .5 5 % 68%
0 7 /0 8 S e c o n d G ra d e G K -7 2 % , C - 7 9 % 6 5 .0 0 % 63%

*Reading-TPRI = PA – Phonemic Awareness, GK – Grapho-phonemic Knowledge, C-Comprehension (all parts of the K/1 TPRI assessment)

Goal Established by the State Board of Education: Globally Competitive Students 21st Century Professionals
st
Healthy, Responsible Students Leadership for Innovation 21 Century Systems

Title I Components: Needs Assessment Reform Strategies Highly Qualified Staff Professional Development
Attract HQ Teachers Teachers included in Decisions Regarding Assessment Use Parental Involvement
Pre-School and Transition Activities for Children Experiencing Difficulties Coordination of Federal, State, Local Services

SACS: Planning School Climate Staff Development

21
Resource/ Person(s)
Strategy Timeline Evaluation
Budget Responsible
Teachers will collaborate on best practices 2009-2010 State and Local Bell Billings Handouts for
with math manipulative kits to provide a Finney Murray each lesson
hands-on learning experience for the students Melnyk Clarke and activity
to learn through the concrete to the abstract Gattis Davis PLC minutes
model. Britt Yebra Meeting
Klein minutes
Z
Data cards will be created to track the 2009-2010 State and Local Bell Billings Data Cards
progress of students with the use of TPRI Finney Murray Meeting
data, math assessment data, and writing Melnyk Clarke Minutes
benchmarks in K-2 classes Gattis Davis Strategies used
Britt Yebra Individual
Klein student data
Z
K-2 teachers will collaborate to plan 2009-2011 State and Local Bell Billings Lesson Plans
differentiated activities to be implemented NRMPS pacing Finney Murray Grade level
during workshop/center time in order to guides Melnyk Clarke minutes
address areas of need for each individual child NCSCOS Gattis Davis
as evidenced by TPRI, math benchmark DPI K-2 Benchmark Britt Yebra
assessments, and writing benchmarks. Assessments Klein
Z
Study Island will be utilized as a tool in second 2009-2010 State and Local Clarke
grade to review and monitor progress on Z Study Island
objectives in preparedness for 3rd grade EOG Billings results
testing Murray
S. Davis
Yebra

22

You might also like