Professional Documents
Culture Documents
Page 1 of 6
3. Obstructions in the storm drainage system- naturally
occurring and manmade- fallen trees, illegal dumping
( even grocery carts)
Some areas of the city are only affected by 2 out of the 3 causes.
But, because of its geography and heavy vegetation, Newmarket
Creek is highly susceptible to all three.
Page 2 of 6
[aerial slide ] Describe subwatershed boundaries- describe
canal system in this area, draining higher ground, how
development spread that way from downtown, and
distinguish with lower lying areas drainage.
This was the first project of its kind commissioned by the
city, using sophisticated computer modeling of the
watershed- this modeling inputs all of the topography,
drainage pipes, ditches and development in the area across
the entire watershed and it show how for various rainfall
intensities, where there will be bottlenecks in the drainage
system and the probable extent of the flooding. It can also
reveal how a modification in the drainage system, or a new
development, might affect the drainage in the rest of the
system.
The study identified a number of specific projects that would
improve the drainage in the watershed which are identified in
the full report- most of these involve the replacement of
undersized drainage pipes.
City is considering these drainage improvements in its capital
improvements planning.
Page 3 of 6
each subdivision designed to drain its own water w/o looking
at the bigger picture in the canal.
Study identified deficiencies in the canal that slowed the flow
of water- city has the corrective work done
Some areas still susceptible to backwater in a major storm
when the Newmarket Canal outfall becomes full of storm
water.
Study raises the question of doing future modeling of the
Newmarket canal watershed, perhaps by the Corps since the
watershed includes two cities
Page 4 of 6
hundreds of thousands of dollars (and hundreds of trees
lives). The Corps follows a very regimented, phased process
that results in an end product that is very thorough, it’s just
very tedious and expensive. Fortunately for Hampton, most
of the expense was federally funded.
[Aerial slide of shoreline]. The study began by looking at
the environmental impacts, probable costs and benefits of
improving Hampton’s shoreline along the Ches Bay in order
to increase the ability of the shoreline/ adjacent structures to
withstand damage from flood tides and wave action ( coast is
a mosaic of ownership, some areas are developed and some
undeveloped)
A number of public meetings were held to discuss the project
Corps primary criteria for funding actual improvements is the
benefit/cost ratio, and only a few areas had a benefit cost
ratio greater than 1, the public beach areas that had
development in the vicinity ( in order to have something to
protect)
Some areas opted out of the study due to not wanting to grant
public access, such as Malo Beach
Final report identified Buckroe Beach as an eligible project.
Council committed a cost share and, in 2005, the Corps
oversaw the pumping of sand on the beach from an offshore
source (which has a very large quantity of beach quality
sand) to provide more storm damage protection. Sand was
also pumped onto the Salt Ponds public beach at 100% local
expense.
Periodic beach nourishment is required as sand is constantly
drifting away- however, breakwaters have been added to
slow the movement of sand. One was in place at the time of
the Corps project, one was added last year and a third will be
constructed in a few months.
Page 5 of 6
7) Salt Ponds Inlet Study [Title slide]
Ken Dierks will talk about this one since he was involved in
the study
Questions?
Page 6 of 6