Professional Documents
Culture Documents
KPI
Background
The term KPI has become one of the most over-used and little understood terms
in business development and management. In theory it provides a series of
measures against which internal managers and external investors can judge the
business and how it is likely to perform over the medium and long term.
Regrettably it has become confused with metrics – if we can measure it, it is a
KPI. Against the growing background of noise created by a welter of such KPI
concepts, the true value of the core KPI becomes lost.
The KPI when properly developed should be provide all staff with clear goals and
objectives, coupled with an understanding of how they relate to the overall
success of the organisation. Published internally and continually referred to, they
will also strengthen shared values and create common goals.
Obviously KPI's cannot operate in a vacuum. One cannot establish a KPI without
a clear understanding of what is possible – so we have to be able to set upper
and lower limits of the KPI in reference to the market and how the competition is
performing (or in the absence of competition, a comparable measurement from a
number of similar organisations). This means that an understanding of
benchmarks is essential to make KPI's useful (and specific to the organisation),
as they put the level of current performance in context – both for start ups and
established enterprises – though they are more important for the latter.
Benchmarks also help in checking what other successful organisations see as
crucial in building and maintaining competitive advantage, as they are central to
any type of competitive analysis.
For each monitoring module, one can then establish what the current level of
performance is in a measurable and understandable way. This is the current
performance. From industry sources, the benchmark level can normally be
introduced (getting to benchmarks is often a difficult process and one requiring a
mixture of low cunning and/or sophisticated analysis). Then a target level of
achievement can be entered. Let us take an example of a financial management
module for an established manufacturing company and what it will tell us.
We can gain an enormous amount of information and control from such a chart,
but obviously not all components will meet the criteria of being a KPI – otherwise
we are back into the problem of measuring everything and not concentrating on a
limited number of core criteria.
An example from the same knowledge centre would look like this:
However, one can set some guidelines. The most rapid way to establish the KPI
within any set of monitoring information is to work through the three criteria in
sequence.
Gross profit is one key measure to the success of the organisation. Research
shows that survival rates are linked to levels of gross profit; gross profit margins
above that of the competition provide clear evidence of competitive advantage.
Z score is a measure of the liquidity of the enterprise and clearly defines positive
or negative trends.
It would be the Ibis argument that the other components of the chart are not key
– they are valuable items of information but are not make or break aspects of
company management (unless they are grotesquely different from benchmark
values).
Are these performance measures – can we quantify them and influence them?
Yes
Yes
The conclusion from this analysis is that in financial reporting the company
should concentrate on gross profit, return on capital employed and Z scores as
their key performance indicators. Both gross profit and return on capital
employed are part of the “model” balanced scorecard for overall objectives that
Ibis propose for the majority of enterprises as part of their planning platform.
Other components within the financial reporting module that might be considered
as KPI's are factors such as the levels of gearing (debt/ equity ratio – DER),
project success rates, bad debt rates, and free cash flow (FCF). Including time,
budget and specification to project reporting would also be a natural addition.
Thus the choices of KPI determine what will drive that part of the enterprise and
what information must be collected to analyse and manage it. Such information
gathering or software choices create information networks that are relevant and
provide data which is used specifically for operational purposes, reducing
information overload and information for information sake.
The KPI is central to a number of other elements in the planning platform which
provides the basis for answering the three crucial planning questions:
They set priorities for investment appraisal, and the choice of emphasis that
should be given to the main strategies within the golden circle, consolidation
(including cost cutting), market penetration, ,market development and product
development.
More information on the way in which Ibis can contribute to your business
plan development is provided at Advantage Ibis